DOCSLIB.ORG

Distribution and Ecology of Certain Bottcm-Living

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Distribution and Ecology of Certain Bottcm-Living DISTRIBUTION AND ECOLOGY OF CERTAIN BOTTCM-LIVING INVERTEBRATES OF THE ii'/ESTERN BaSIN OF IAKE ERIE DISSERTATION Presented in partial fulfillm ent of the requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State U n iv e r s ity by Kenneth George Wood, B.A., M.A. The Ohio State University 1953 «4 * ** Approved by* » i * ♦ , t • • < ■ i « A d v is e r i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 1 ACKNOiYlE DC M EN TS....................................................................................................... 2 METHODS ............... 2 S a m p l i n g............................................................................................................ 2 Analysis of sediments ............................................................................... 9 Organic matter content ................................................................ 9 Particle size com position...................................................... 10 Moisture content ....... ............................................. 11 S tatistical representation ...................................................... 11 PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE L a KE ....................................................... lU MorphoroetQr .................................. 1U G e o l o g y.................................................................................................................. 15 D r a i n a g e ............................................................................................................ 16 T u r b i d i t y ............................................................................................................. 19 Temperature....................................................................................................... 19 Chemical fa c to rs ......................................................................................... 20 CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SEDIMENTS................................................................ 20 Organic m a tte r .............................................................................................. 20 Distribution in the lak e ........................................................... 20 Relation to currents ..................................................................... 22 Relation to p o llu tio n ................................................................ 23 Comparison with other la k e s .................................................. 23 Particle size composition..................................................................... 25 MMAlMf MW* Distribution in the lak e ........................................................... 25 A 0 3 8 5 3 i i Page Relation to currents ..................................................................... 26 THE BOTTOM—LIVING g r ^ T E B R A T E S ................................................................ 33 Distribution of the total w eig h t ................................................. 33 Total weight in relation to that of other lakes ...» 39 Distribution of the fauna in relation to bottom sediments 39 HOLLUSCA. ........................................................................................................................... b$ FEIiiCYPOIA .............................................. ^ ............................................................... kS Nomenclature .................................................................................................. U5 U nio n ! d a e ............................................................................................................ U6 Previous Lake Erie records ...................................................... I46 Collections at Put-in-B ay....................................................... k l General distribution ..................................................................... 50 Distribution in relation to depth of water and to shore 52 Distribution in relation to bottom sediments . 5U U n i o n i n a e .............................................................................................. 56 Quadrula quadrula ................................................................ 56 Quadrula pustulosa............................................................ 56 Amblema co atata ........................ 56 Pleurobema cor datum coccineum ................................... 53 Fusconaia flava ..................................................................... 53 B lliptio dilatatus ............................................................ 60 Anodontinae ......................................................................................... 61 Strophitus rugosus........................................................... 61 Anodonta grandls ................................................................. 61 Lasmigona co stata ................................................................. 62 i i i Page Lamps!11nae ....... 62 Obliquaria reflexa ........................................................... 62 Proptera alata ..................................................................... 63 Obovarla subrotunda ........................................................... 63 Carunculina parva................................................................ 61* Leptodea fragills ................................................................ 61* Llgumla re c ta .......................................................................... 66 Ligumla nasuta ..................................................................... 66 Mlcromya fa b a lis ................................................................ 68 lamps ills siliquoidea . • • ........................................ 70 Lamps ills v en trico sa ........................................................ 71 Truncilla truncate * ...... 72 Trune ilia donacif o m iis .................................................. 72 Dysnomia triquetra ................... 73 Sphaeriidae ......... ....... 73 Sphaerium striatin u m ..................................................... 76 Sphaerium corneum................................................................. 76 Sphaerium (Musculium) transversum......................... 79 P is id iu m .................. 81 G&STROFODfL...................................................................................................................... 81 General distribution .................................................................... 81 Distribution in relation to bottom sediments . 81* Ctenobranchiata .............................................................................................. 81* V a l v a t i d a e ............................................................................................ 81* Valvata tricarinata .................................................. 31* XV Page V. sine e r a .......................................................................... 85 V. l e w i s i i .............................................................................. 35 V. bicarinata ....................................... .................................. 85 V iviparidae ........................................................................................ 38 Campeloma decisum................................................................ 88 Am nicolidae .................................. ..................................................... 88 Amnicola lustrica ................................................................ 88 A . I n t e g r a ............................................................................... 88a A • limosa ..................................................... 33a A. binneyana .......................................................................... 90 Soma to gyrus subglobosus ................................................ 90 Bull miis t e ntaculatus ........................................ 92 P le u r o c e r id a e .................................................................... 96 Pleurocera acutum ............................................................... 96 Goniobasis livescens • 97 P u lx n o n a ta .......................................................... 97 Planorbidae ....................................................................................... 97 Helisotna triv o lv is ........................................................... 97 H. anceps percarinatum................................................. 98 P h y s i d a e..................................................... 98 F hysa s p....................................................................................... 98 ANNELIDA............................................................................................................................ 100 CHAETOFOEfci OLIGOCHAETA.................................................................................... 100 HIRUDINEA ...................................................................................................................... 102 G lossiphoniidae............................................................................... 102 V Page Helobdella stagnalis * 102 H* nepheloidea .................................................................. 10U Glossiphonia complanata . 10U Placobdella m ontifera .................................................... 106 Erpobdellidae ................................................................................ 108 Srpobdella punctata
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Research Report110
    ~ ~ WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES A Survey of Rare and Endangered Mayflies of Selected RESEARCH Rivers of Wisconsin by Richard A. Lillie REPORT110 Bureau of Research, Monona December 1995 ~ Abstract The mayfly fauna of 25 rivers and streams in Wisconsin were surveyed during 1991-93 to document the temporal and spatial occurrence patterns of two state endangered mayflies, Acantha­ metropus pecatonica and Anepeorus simplex. Both species are candidates under review for addition to the federal List of Endang­ ered and Threatened Wildlife. Based on previous records of occur­ rence in Wisconsin, sampling was conducted during the period May-July using a combination of sampling methods, including dredges, air-lift pumps, kick-nets, and hand-picking of substrates. No specimens of Anepeorus simplex were collected. Three specimens (nymphs or larvae) of Acanthametropus pecatonica were found in the Black River, one nymph was collected from the lower Wisconsin River, and a partial exuviae was collected from the Chippewa River. Homoeoneuria ammophila was recorded from Wisconsin waters for the first time from the Black River and Sugar River. New site distribution records for the following Wiscon­ sin special concern species include: Macdunnoa persimplex, Metretopus borealis, Paracloeodes minutus, Parameletus chelifer, Pentagenia vittigera, Cercobrachys sp., and Pseudiron centra/is. Collection of many of the aforementioned species from large rivers appears to be dependent upon sampling sand-bottomed substrates at frequent intervals, as several species were relatively abundant during only very short time spans. Most species were associated with sand substrates in water < 2 m deep. Acantha­ metropus pecatonica and Anepeorus simplex should continue to be listed as endangered for state purposes and receive a biological rarity ranking of critically imperiled (S1 ranking), and both species should be considered as candidates proposed for listing as endangered or threatened as defined by the Endangered Species Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of a Hydropeaking Dam on River Health and Benthic Macroinvertebrate Secondary Production in a Northern Great Plains Rive
    EFFECTS OF A HYDROPEAKING DAM ON RIVER HEALTH AND BENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATE SECONDARY PRODUCTION IN A NORTHERN GREAT PLAINS RIVER A Thesis Submitted to the College of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Environment and Sustainability in the School of Environment and Sustainability University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon By Jordan Edward Mihalicz © Copyright Jordan Edward Mihalicz, January 2018. All rights reserved. PERMISSION TO USE In presenting this thesis in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a Postgraduate degree from the University of Saskatchewan, I agree that the Libraries of this University may make it freely available for inspection. I further agree that permission for copying of this thesis in any manner, in whole or in part, for scholarly purposes may be granted by the professors who supervised my thesis work or, in their absence, by the Head of the Department or the Dean of the College in which my thesis work was done. It is understood that any copying or publication or use of this thesis or parts thereof for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. It is also understood that due recognition shall be given to me and to the University of Saskatchewan in any scholarly use that may be made of any material in my thesis. Requests for permission to copy or make other uses of materials in this thesis, in whole or in part, should be addressed to: Head, School of Environment and Sustainability University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 5A8 Canada OR Dean College of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies University of Saskatchewan 116 Thorvaldson Building, 110 Science Place Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 5C9 Canada i ABSTRACT Hydroelectric dams represent an ever-growing portion of the global energy grid, and the number of operations practicing hydropeaking is on the rise.
    [Show full text]
  • Microsoft Outlook
    Joey Steil From: Leslie Jordan <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2018 1:13 PM To: Angela Ruberto Subject: Potential Environmental Beneficial Users of Surface Water in Your GSA Attachments: Paso Basin - County of San Luis Obispo Groundwater Sustainabilit_detail.xls; Field_Descriptions.xlsx; Freshwater_Species_Data_Sources.xls; FW_Paper_PLOSONE.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S1.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S2.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S3.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S4.pdf CALIFORNIA WATER | GROUNDWATER To: GSAs We write to provide a starting point for addressing environmental beneficial users of surface water, as required under the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA). SGMA seeks to achieve sustainability, which is defined as the absence of several undesirable results, including “depletions of interconnected surface water that have significant and unreasonable adverse impacts on beneficial users of surface water” (Water Code §10721). The Nature Conservancy (TNC) is a science-based, nonprofit organization with a mission to conserve the lands and waters on which all life depends. Like humans, plants and animals often rely on groundwater for survival, which is why TNC helped develop, and is now helping to implement, SGMA. Earlier this year, we launched the Groundwater Resource Hub, which is an online resource intended to help make it easier and cheaper to address environmental requirements under SGMA. As a first step in addressing when depletions might have an adverse impact, The Nature Conservancy recommends identifying the beneficial users of surface water, which include environmental users. This is a critical step, as it is impossible to define “significant and unreasonable adverse impacts” without knowing what is being impacted. To make this easy, we are providing this letter and the accompanying documents as the best available science on the freshwater species within the boundary of your groundwater sustainability agency (GSA).
    [Show full text]
  • Beiträge Zur Bayerischen Entomofaunistik 13: 67–207
    Beiträge zur bayerischen Entomofaunistik 13:67–207, Bamberg (2014), ISSN 1430-015X Grundlegende Untersuchungen zur vielfältigen Insektenfauna im Tiergarten Nürnberg unter besonderer Betonung der Hymenoptera Auswertung von Malaisefallenfängen in den Jahren 1989 und 1990 von Klaus von der Dunk & Manfred Kraus Inhaltsverzeichnis 1. Einleitung 68 2. Untersuchungsgebiet 68 3. Methodik 69 3.1. Planung 69 3.2. Malaisefallen (MF) im Tiergarten 1989, mit Gelbschalen (GS) und Handfänge 69 3.3. Beschreibung der Fallenstandorte 70 3.4. Malaisefallen, Gelbschalen und Handfänge 1990 71 4. Darstellung der Untersuchungsergebnisse 71 4.1. Die Tabellen 71 4.2. Umfang der Untersuchungen 73 4.3. Grenzen der Interpretation von Fallenfängen 73 5. Untersuchungsergebnisse 74 5.1. Hymenoptera 74 5.1.1. Hymenoptera – Symphyta (Blattwespen) 74 5.1.1.1. Tabelle Symphyta 74 5.1.1.2. Tabellen Leerungstermine der Malaisefallen und Gelbschalen und Blattwespenanzahl 78 5.1.1.3. Symphyta 79 5.1.2. Hymenoptera – Terebrantia 87 5.1.2.1. Tabelle Terebrantia 87 5.1.2.2. Tabelle Ichneumonidae (det. R. Bauer) mit Ergänzungen 91 5.1.2.3. Terebrantia: Evanoidea bis Chalcididae – Ichneumonidae – Braconidae 100 5.1.2.4. Bauer, R.: Ichneumoniden aus den Fängen in Malaisefallen von Dr. M. Kraus im Tiergarten Nürnberg in den Jahren 1989 und 1990 111 5.1.3. Hymenoptera – Apocrita – Aculeata 117 5.1.3.1. Tabellen: Apidae, Formicidae, Chrysididae, Pompilidae, Vespidae, Sphecidae, Mutillidae, Sapygidae, Tiphiidae 117 5.1.3.2. Apidae, Formicidae, Chrysididae, Pompilidae, Vespidae, Sphecidae, Mutillidae, Sapygidae, Tiphiidae 122 5.1.4. Coleoptera 131 5.1.4.1. Tabelle Coleoptera 131 5.1.4.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Saginaw Bay Lake Huron
    Final Report to Michigan Great Lakes Protection Fund Office of Great Lakes Michigan Department of Environmental Quality Development of Indices of Biotic Integrity for Great Lakes Coastal Wetlands Thomas M. Burton1,2 and Donald G. Uzarski3 Departments of Zoology1 and Fisheries and Wildlife2 Michigan State University East Lansing, MI 48824 and Annis Water Resources Institute3 Grand Valley State University Lake Michigan Center 740 West Shoreline Drive Muskegon, MI 49441 This research was made possible with funding from the Office of Great Lakes through the Great Lakes Protection Fund July 2003 Table of Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................ 1 Objectives .............................................................................................................. 2 Methods ................................................................................................................. 2 Site Selection ................................................................................................ 2 Sampling Procedures .................................................................................... 2 Results ................................................................................................................... 5 Invertebrates - Drowned River Mouth Wetlands ......................................... 6 Invertebrates - Fringing Wetlands ................................................................ 7 Fish Results .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomy of Micronectidae (Heteroptera: Nepomorpha) from Vietnam, with Descriptions of 11 New Species
    European Journal of Taxonomy 756: 1–82 ISSN 2118-9773 https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2021.756.1407 www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu 2021 · Ha T.N. & Tran A.D. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0). Monograph urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:4A60FB62-20D7-4DC9-A4EA-BCE633730111 Taxonomy of Micronectidae (Heteroptera: Nepomorpha) from Vietnam, with descriptions of 11 new species Tuyet Ngan HA 1 & Anh Duc TRAN 2,* 1,2 Faculty of Biology, VNU University of Science, Vietnam National University, Hanoi, 334 Nguyen Trai, Thanh Xuan, Hanoi, Vietnam. * Corresponding author: [email protected] 1 Email: [email protected] 1 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:568A022B-D36D-4147-8B0D-FB35B2A4D197 2 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:3CB36F17-D917-4600-B888-C33B1C04259F Abstract. The taxonomy of Micronectidae in Vietnam is reviewed. Based on our cumulative collections during 2001–2020, 11 new species of Micronecta Kirkaldy, 1897 are documented and described in this study: M. acuminata sp. nov., M. arcuata sp. nov., M. caperata sp. nov., M. clavata sp. nov., M. cultellata sp. nov., M. fulvopicta sp. nov., M. nieseri sp. nov., M. pingae sp. nov., M. sinuata sp. nov., M. undulata sp. nov., and M. vietnamica sp. nov. Nine species are recorded from Vietnam for the fi rst time: M. decorata Lundblad, 1933, M. drepani Nieser, 2000, M. erythra Nieser, Chen & Yang, 2005, M. fugitans Breddin, 1905, M. johorensis Fernando, 1964, M. melanochroa Nieser, Chen & Yang, 2005, M. ornitheia Nieser, Chen & Yang, 2005, M. sahlbergi (Jakovlev, 1881), and M. tuwanoni Nieser, Chen, Leksawasdi, Thanyakam & Duangsupa, 2004.
    [Show full text]
  • M.Sc Final Thesis
    INDICATOR INVERTEBRATES: DETERMINING CHANGE IN BENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATE COMMUNITIES DUE TO DEPOSITED SEDIMENT IN THE NORTHERN GREAT PLAINS A Thesis Submitted to the College of Graduate Studies and Research In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Master of Science In the Department of Biology University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon By Brittney Marie Hoemsen Copyright Brittney Marie Hoemsen, April, 2015. All rights reserved. Permission to Use In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for a Postgraduate degree from the University of Saskatchewan, I agree that the Libraries of this University may make it freely available for inspection. I further agree that permission for copying of this thesis in any manner, in whole or in part, for scholarly purposes may be granted by the professor or professors who supervised my thesis work or, in their absence, by the Head of the Department or the Dean of the College in which my thesis work was done. It is understood that any copying or publication or use of this thesis or parts thereof for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. It is also understood that due recognition shall be given to me and to the University of Saskatchewan in any scholarly use which may be made of any material in my thesis. Requests for permission to copy or to make other use of material in this thesis in whole or part should be addressed to: Head of the Department of Biology University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon, Saskatchewan (S7N 5E2) i ABSTRACT Excessive sedimentation is a major stressor to ecosystem health in freshwater systems globally.
    [Show full text]
  • Aquatic Invertebrate Fauna of a Northern Prairie Stream: Range Extensions and Water Quality Characteristics
    Western North American Naturalist Volume 68 Number 2 Article 5 6-10-2008 Aquatic invertebrate fauna of a northern prairie stream: range extensions and water quality characteristics Iain D. Phillips Stewardship Division, Saskatchewan Watershed Authority, Saskatchewan, Canada Dale Parker AquaTax Consulting, Saskatchewan, Canada Glen McMaster Stewardship Division, Saskatchewan Watershed Authority, Saskatchewan, Canada Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/wnan Recommended Citation Phillips, Iain D.; Parker, Dale; and McMaster, Glen (2008) "Aquatic invertebrate fauna of a northern prairie stream: range extensions and water quality characteristics," Western North American Naturalist: Vol. 68 : No. 2 , Article 5. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/wnan/vol68/iss2/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Western North American Naturalist by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Western North American Naturalist 68(2), © 2008, pp. 173–185 AQUATIC INVERTEBRATE FAUNA OF A NORTHERN PRAIRIE STREAM: RANGE EXTENSIONS AND WATER QUALITY CHARACTERISTICS Iain D. Phillips1, Dale Parker2, and Glen McMaster3 ABSTRACT.—The benthic macroinvertebrate fauna of southern Saskatchewan, Canada, has received little attention relative to other regions of western North America. Therefore, little is known of the related aquatic ecosystem health and biogeography of regional aquatic insects. Here we present the results of an aquatic macroinvertebrate survey for the Pipestone Creek watershed in southeastern Saskatchewan. We qualitatively sampled aquatic macroinvertebrates in 5 sites on 4 dates through spring, summer, and fall 2006.
    [Show full text]
  • Aquatic Invertebrates of the Moose River Basin · an Initial Characterization of Aquatic Invertebrate Community :~Tructure in the Moose River Basin, Ontario
    AQUATIC INVERTEBRATES OF THE MOOSE RIVER BASIN · AN INITIAL CHARACTERIZATION OF AQUATIC INVERTEBRATE COMMUNITY :~TRUCTURE IN THE MOOSE RIVER BASIN, ONTARIO by CATRIEN WILLEMINA BOUWMAN, B.A. A Thesis Submitted to the School ofGraduate Studies in Partial Fulfillment ofthe Requirements for the Degree Master ofScience McMaster University ©Copyright by Catrien Willemina Bouwman, Aprill996. MASTER OF SCIENCE (1996) McMaster University (Biology) Hamilton, Ontario TITLE: Aquatic Invertebrate Community Structure in the Moose ruver Basin. AUTHOR: Catrien W. Bouwman, B.A. (McMaster University) SUPERVISOR: Dr. Jurek Kolasa NUMBER OF PAGE~:: xi, 96 ii Abstract The Moose River Basin in northern Ontario is an important large river system, however very little is known about its aquatic invertebrate community. As macroinvertebrates are an integral part ofriver ecosystems, I conducted an initial assessment ofthe aquatic invertebrate community structure in the Moose River Basin, at both a fine, and a basin-wide, scale. The fine scale study used invertebrate data collected at five reaches within~. 30km stretch ofthe Groundhog River. The examination ofthe invertebrate community at a basin-wide scale was accomplished using meta-analysis techniques on twenty-two studies conducted on various rivers within the Basin. The effect ofthe following factors on community structure were examined: i) the use of different sampling devices, ii) water depth, iii) substrate type, iv) sampling in two consecutive years, and v) spatial scale. I found that the use ofvarious sampling devices resulted in significantly different estimates ofcommunity structure. This strongly suggests that consistent sampling protocols are necessary to effectively compare results within, and among, studies. The etfect ofwater depth on community structure was inconclusive, as too few samples were ,:ollected to overcome the confounding effects of substrate type.
    [Show full text]
  • Patterns of Freshwater Species Richness, Endemism, and Vulnerability in California
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Patterns of Freshwater Species Richness, Endemism, and Vulnerability in California Jeanette K. Howard1☯*, Kirk R. Klausmeyer1☯, Kurt A. Fesenmyer2☯, Joseph Furnish3, Thomas Gardali4, Ted Grantham5, Jacob V. E. Katz5, Sarah Kupferberg6, Patrick McIntyre7, Peter B. Moyle5, Peter R. Ode8, Ryan Peek5, Rebecca M. Quiñones5, Andrew C. Rehn7, Nick Santos5, Steve Schoenig7, Larry Serpa1, Jackson D. Shedd1, Joe Slusark7, Joshua H. Viers9, Amber Wright10, Scott A. Morrison1 1 The Nature Conservancy, San Francisco, California, United States of America, 2 Trout Unlimited, Boise, Idaho, United States of America, 3 USDA Forest Service, Vallejo, California, United States of America, 4 Point Blue Conservation Science, Petaluma, California, United States of America, 5 Center for Watershed Sciences and Department of Wildlife Fish and Conservation Biology, University of California Davis, Davis, California, United States of America, 6 Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, United States of America, 7 Biogeographic Data Branch, California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Sacramento, California, United States of America, 8 Aquatic Bioassessment Laboratory, California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Rancho Cordova, California, United States of America, 9 School of Engineering, University of California Merced, Merced, California, United States of America, 10 Department of Biology, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, Hawaii, United States of America ☯ OPEN ACCESS These authors contributed equally to this work. * [email protected] Citation: Howard JK, Klausmeyer KR, Fesenmyer KA, Furnish J, Gardali T, Grantham T, et al. (2015) Patterns of Freshwater Species Richness, Abstract Endemism, and Vulnerability in California. PLoS ONE 10(7): e0130710. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0130710 The ranges and abundances of species that depend on freshwater habitats are declining Editor: Brian Gratwicke, Smithsonian's National worldwide.
    [Show full text]
  • Heteroptera Or True Bugs of Ecuador: a Partial Catalog
    Heteroptera or True Bugs of Ecuador: A Partial Catalog RICHARD C. FROESCHNER m wtu. SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO ZOOLOGY • NUMBER 322 SERIES PUBLICATIONS OF THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION Emphasis upon publication as a means of "diffusing knowledge" was expressed by the first Secretary of the Smithsonian. In his formal plan for the Institution, Joseph Henry outlined a program that included the following statement: "It is proposed to publish a series of reports, giving an account of the new discoveries in science, and of the changes made from year to year in all branches of knowledge." This theme of basic research has been adhered to through the years by thousands of titles issued in series publications under the Smithsonian imprint, commencing with Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge in 1848 and continuing with the following active series: Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology Smithsonian Contributions to Astrophysics Smithsonian Contributions to Botany Smithsonian Contributions to the Earth Sciences Smithsonian Contributions to the Marine Sciences Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology Smithsonian Studies in Air and Space Smithsonian Studies in History and Technology In these series, the Institution publishes small papers and full-scale monographs that report the research and collections of its various museums and bureaux or of professional colleagues in the world cf science and scholarship. The publications are distributed by mailing lists to libraries, universities, and similar institutions throughout the world. Papers or monographs submitted for series publication are received by the Smithsonian Institution Press, subject to its own review for format and style, only through departments of the various Smithsonian museums or bureaux, where the manuscripts are given substantive review.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Als PDF
    Dieses PDF wird von der Arbeitsgemeinschaft bayerischer Entomologen e.V.für den privaten bzw. wissenschaftlichen Gebrauch zur Verfügung gestellt. Die kommerzielle Nutzung oder die Bereitstellung in einer öffentlichen Bibliothek oder auf einer website ist nicht gestattet. Beiträge zur bayerischen Entomofaunistik 13:67–207, Bamberg (2014), ISSN 1430-015X Grundlegende Untersuchungen zur vielfältigen Insektenfauna im Tiergarten Nürnberg unter besonderer Betonung der Hymenoptera Auswertung von Malaisefallenfängen in den Jahren 1989 und 1990 von Klaus von der Dunk & Manfred Kraus Inhaltsverzeichnis 1. Einleitung 68 2. Untersuchungsgebiet 68 3. Methodik 69 3.1. Planung 69 3.2. Malaisefallen (MF) im Tiergarten 1989, mit Gelbschalen (GS) und Handfänge 69 3.3. Beschreibung der Fallenstandorte 70 3.4. Malaisefallen, Gelbschalen und Handfänge 1990 71 4. Darstellung der Untersuchungsergebnisse 71 4.1. Die Tabellen 71 4.2. Umfang der Untersuchungen 73 4.3. Grenzen der Interpretation von Fallenfängen 73 5. Untersuchungsergebnisse 74 5.1. Hymenoptera 74 5.1.1. Hymenoptera – Symphyta (Blattwespen) 74 5.1.1.1. Tabelle Symphyta 74 5.1.1.2. Tabellen Leerungstermine der Malaisefallen und Gelbschalen und Blattwespenanzahl 78 5.1.1.3. Symphyta 79 5.1.2. Hymenoptera – Terebrantia 87 5.1.2.1. Tabelle Terebrantia 87 5.1.2.2. Tabelle Ichneumonidae (det. R. Bauer) mit Ergänzungen 91 5.1.2.3. Terebrantia: Evanoidea bis Chalcididae – Ichneumonidae – Braconidae 100 5.1.2.4. Bauer, R.: Ichneumoniden aus den Fängen in Malaisefallen von Dr. M. Kraus im Tiergarten Nürnberg in den Jahren 1989 und 1990 111 5.1.3. Hymenoptera – Apocrita – Aculeata 117 5.1.3.1. Tabellen: Apidae, Formicidae, Chrysididae, Pompilidae, Vespidae, Sphecidae, Mutillidae, Sapygidae, Tiphiidae 117 5.1.3.2.
    [Show full text]