DOCSLIB.ORG

Lonjsko Polje Nature Park Bulletin

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

ISSN: 1332-0688 UDK: 502.4 ISSN: 1332-0688 UDK: 502.4 1/2 1/2 Broj/Num Broj/Num 2 2 Godina/Vol. Godina/Vol. Godina/Vol. Godina/Vol. BILTENBILTENPPARKAARKAPRIRODEPRIRODENATURENATUREPPARKARKBULLETINBULLETIN Bilten parka prirode Lonjsko Polje Nature Park Bulletin VOL.2/NO. 1/2, 2000. “Ovaj projekt je izraen uz pomoÊ LIFE financijskog instrumenta Europske unije” “This project has been carried out with the contribution of the LIFE financial instrument of the Europenan Community. Nakladnik / Published by: Javna ustanova “Park prirode Lonjsko polje” Lonjsko Polje Nature Park Public Service HR-44324 Jasenovac, Trg kralja Petra SvaËiÊa bb / Hrvatska / Croatia Glavni i odgovorni urednik / Editor in chief: Goran GugiÊ Uredniπtvo / Editorial board: Darko KovaËiÊ, Radenko DeæeliÊ, Martin Sdchneider-Jacoby Tajnica uredniπtva / Administarative secretary: Marija Kuπina Adresa uredniπtva / Adress of the Editorial Board: Javna ustanova “Park prirode Lonjsko polje” Bilten, HR-44324 Jasenovac, Trg kralja Petra SvaËiÊa bb, HRVATSKA / CROATIA Tel/fax: ++385 (0)44 672 080; E-mail: [email protected] Prijevod / Translation: Graham McMaster Lektor / Lecturer: Ivan Jindra Oblikovanje / Design: Kratis d.o.o. Izlazi dva puta godiπnje The Bulletin appears twice yearly Naklada: 2000 primjeraka 2 Bilten parka prirode Lonjsko polje Nature Park Bulletin Vol.2/No. 1, 2000. SADRÆAJ - CONTENTS: UVOD / INTRODUCTION MASTER PLAN TURIZMA - REGIONALNI KONCET ZA LONJSKO POLJE - POSAVINA/ MASTER PLAN FOR TOURISM - REGIONAL CONCEPT FOR THE LONJSKO POLJE NATURE PARK - POSAVINA 1 CILJEVI KONCEPTA / OBJECTIVES OF THE CONCEPT 1.1 Masterplan za Hrvatsku / The Master Plan for Croatia .................................................................................... 7 1.2 Perspektive zapoπljavanja i blagostanja / The outlook for employment and prosperity .................................... 9 1.3 Odræivost i razvoj / Sustainability and development ........................................................................................ 9 1.4 Put do proizvoda Posavina / The way to the Posavina product ...................................................................... 10 1.5 Menadæment i privatne inicijative / Management and private initiatives ...................................................... 12 2 PODRU»JE PROJEKTA / THE AREA OF THE PROJECT 2.1 Srediπnje podruËje: poplavno podruËje Save / The central area: the Sava flood plain .................................. 16 2.2 Susjedne regije / Neighbouring regions .......................................................................................................... 16 2.3 Zagreb / Zagreb ................................................................................................................................................ 17 2.4 Srediπnje podruËje kao jezgra / The central area as core ................................................................................ 17 3 POSTOJE∆E STANJE / THE EXISTING SITUATION 3.1 Klima srediπnjega podruËja / The climate of the central area .......................................................................... 19 3.2 Infrastruktura / Infrastructure .......................................................................................................................... 19 3.3 Razvoj turizma / Development of tourism ........................................................................................................ 21 3.4 Regionalno gospodarstvo / The regional economy .......................................................................................... 23 3.5 Strukture stanovniπtva / Population structure .................................................................................................. 24 4 TURISTI»KI POTENCIJALI / TOURIST POTENTIALS 4.1 U srediπnjem podruËju / In the central area .................................................................................................... 25 4.2 Povijest graniËnoga podruËja / History of the border area .............................................................................. 33 4.3 Rijeke, ribnjaci, topli izvori / Rivers, fishponds, hot springs .......................................................................... 38 5 USP (UNIQUE SELLING POINT) U EUROPSKOJ USPOREDBI / THE USP (UNIQUE SELLING POINT) IN EUROPEAN COMPARISONS 5.1 Lonjsko polje ‡ jedinstveni park prirode na Mediteranu / Lonjsko Polje Naure Park - one of a kind in the Mediterranean .................................................................... 41 5.2 Vaæan element identiteta / An important element of the identity .................................................................... 41 5.3 TuristiËka privlaËnost / Tourist attractiveness .................................................................................................. 41 5.4 Mozaik s doæivljajnim potencijalom / A mosaic with experiential potential .................................................. 42 5.5 TuristiËki plan / The tourist plan ...................................................................................................................... 42 6 POTENCIJALNE ZAPREKE / POTENTIAL OBSTACLES 6.1 Prostorno ureenje / Land planning and zoning .............................................................................................. 43 6.2 Sukobi ciljeva / Conflicts of objectives ............................................................................................................ 43 6.3 Industrijski ureaji / Industrial plant ................................................................................................................ 45 6.4 Arhitektonske strukture / Architectural structures............................................................................................ 46 Bilten parka prirode 3 Lonjsko polje Nature Park Bulletin Vol.2/No. 1, 2000. 7 TRÆI©TA I CILJNE SKUPINE / MARKETS AND TARGET GROUPS 7.1 Tri kljuËna træiπta / Three key markets ............................................................................................................ 47 7.2 Motivacije ciljnih skupina / Motivations of target groups .............................................................................. 47 7.3 Prirodni turisti (ekoturisti) / Nature tourists (or eco-tourists) ........................................................................ 49 8 TURISTI»KI KONCEPT / TOURIST CONCEPT 8.1 Ciljevi / Objectives .......................................................................................................................................... 50 8.2 Stupovi ponude / The pillars of the product range .......................................................................................... 53 9PRVAFAZA REALIZACIJE / THE FIRST PHASE OF IMPLEMENTATION 9.1 UkljuËivanje javnosti / Involvement of the public ............................................................................................ 61 9.2 TuristiËka ponuda / The tourist product .......................................................................................................... 61 9.3 Promidæba i plasman / Promotion and sales .................................................................................................... 64 9.4 Edukacija / Education ...................................................................................................................................... 65 9.5 Financiranje / Financing .................................................................................................................................. 65 9.6 Koordinacija / Coordination ............................................................................................................................ 65 10 OGLEDNI PROJEKTI / MODEL PROJECTS 10.1 Sisak / Sisak ...................................................................................................................................................... 66 10.2 Usmjeravanje posjetitelja u parku prirode Lonjsko polje / Directing visitors in the Lonjsko Polje Nature Park ........................................................................................ 68 10.3 Posavska sela ‡ svako selo unikat / Posavina villages - every village is a one-off ........................................ 72 10.4 U gostima u posavskoj kuÊi / Staying in a Posavina house ............................................................................ 73 10.5 Model doæivljaja prirode‡ Mlaka u Mokrom polju / A model for the experience of nature - Mlaka, in Mokro Polje ...................................................................... 78 10.6 Ribnjaci ‡ neizbjeæna sastavnica krajolika rijeËne doline / Fishponds - an inseparable part of this landscape .......................................................................................... 82 11 APENDIKS / APPENDIX 11.1 Procjena sela s aspekta zaπtite spomenika / Evaluation ofthe contryside from the point of view of the protectin of monuments ........................................ 84 11.2 Potencijal drvenih kuÊa / The potential of the wooden houses ........................................................................ 84 11.3 Zaπtita od visokih voda u projektnom podruËju / Protection against high waters in the project area .......... 86 11.4 Susjedna podruËja - Potencijalni rezervat biosfere - Srediπnja Posavina Neighbouring areas Potential biosphere reserve, Central Posavina .............................................................. 88 11.5 Ugroæene, privlaËne vrste ptica u susjednom podruËju / Endangered but attractive bird species in the neighbouring area .................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Mediterranei Edited by Mitja Guštin

    Mediterranei Edited by Mitja Guštin

    Univerzitet u Beogradu, Filozofski fakultet MEDI TERRA NE I Univerza na Primorskem, Znanstveno-raziskovalno središče Koper, Založba Annales Analles Mediterranei Edited by Mitja Guštin The Eastern Celts The Communities between the Alps and the Black Sea Edited by Mitja Guštin Institute for Mediterranean Heritage, Science and Research Centre Koper, University of Primorska Miloš Jevtić Department of Archaeology, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Belgrade Reviews: Acad. prof. Nikola Tasić, PhD; Acad. prof. Biba Teržan, PhD Secretary: Marija Ljuština, Petra Vojaković, Andrej Preložnik Translating and proof-reading: Vesna Pintarič Kocuvan Cover design: Andrej Preložnik Print: Littera picta d.o.o. Printed in 300 copies Publisher Univerza na Primorskem, Znanstveno-raziskovalno središče Koper, Založba Annales Cover: Kantharos from Beograd – Karaburma, grave 34 (original in Belgrade City Museum). CIP - Kataložni zapis o publikaciji Narodna in univerzitetna knjižnica, Ljubljana 903(4)‘638’(082) The EASTERN Celts : the communities between the Alps and the Black Sea / edited by Mitja Guštin and Miloš Jevtić ; [translating Vesna Pintarič Kocuvan]. - Koper : Univerza na Primorskem, Znanstveno-raziskovalno središče, Univerzitetna založba Annales, 2011. - (Knjižnica Annales Mediterranei) ISBN 978-961-6862-00-4 1. Guštin, Mitja, 1947- 257456384 THE EAS T ERN CEL T S THE CoMMUNITIES BETwEEN THE ALPS AND THE BLACK SEA Edited by Mitja GUŠTIN, Miloš JEVTIć Koper–Beograd 2011 C o n t e n t s Mitja GUŠTIN, Miloš JEVTIć From treasure of objects to treasure
  • Castle Studies Kaštelologija

    Castle Studies Kaštelologija

    148 PROSTOR 1[61] 29[2021] Book Review Marin Duić Castle Studies Publishers: UPI-2M PLUS and the Faculty of Architecture, Anti-Turkish Castles in Banovina University of Zagreb, Zagreb, 2020 th at the End of the 15 and the Beginning 181 pages, preface, catalogue, literature, th about the author of the 16 Century [26´21 cm, b/w, paperback, Croatian] Kaštelologija Reviewers: Zlatko Karač, Milan Kruhek, Ariana Štulhofer Editor: Ariana Štulhofer Protuturski kašteli na Banovini Design: Saša Stubičar krajem 15. i početkom 16. stoljeća Proofreader: Mira Pavlica-Stojčević ISBN 978-953-7703-48-6 Zorislav Horvat CIP 001065766 [NSK Zagreb] At the end of the 15th century, due to the ap- number of fortifications were built and im- purposes of this publication. In those seven pearance of gunpowder and artillery, the pre- proved. Those fortifications are mostly ne- chapters, the author thematically deals with vious ways of warfare with cold weapons glected today, but they still convey the iden- individual sites (such as Hrastovica and cas- were abandoned. New types of fortifications, tity of previously mentioned border areas. tles on the northern slopes of Zrinska gora or th now designed for active defence against in- All these changes in fortification buildings castles of the Zrinski family in the late 15 th vaders, were built. The fall of the Kingdom of are described in Zorislav Horvat’s new book and 16 centuries in the Pounje region), peo- Bosnia in 1463, and the impending Ottoman called “Castle studies - Anti-Turkish Castles ple (such as the fortifications of Bernardin aggression on Croatian lands coincided with in Banovina at the End of the 15th and the Be- Frankopan), or types of building (such as new fortification needs and constructions, ginning of the 16th Century”.
  • DIKTAS Country Report

    DIKTAS Country Report

    Protection and Sustainable Use of the Dinaric Karst Transboundary Aquifer System Country Report (Regional Aspect) - Croatia http://diktas.iwlearn.org Protection and Sustainable Use of the Dinaric Karst Transboundary Aquifer System Contents HYDROGEOLOGICAL OVERVIEW 1. Introduction 1.1. Project task and role of WG1 1.2. General on karst – term, distribution. Importance 1.3. Histrical review of karst researches 2. Physiography and climate 2.1. Geographic position and boundaries 2.2. Vegetation and land cover 2.3. Rainfall regime 2.4. Air temperature 2.5. Other climate elements 3. Hydrology 3.1. Hydrographic network 3.2. Stream-flow regime 3.3. Controlling streamflow – dams and reservoirs 4. Geological pattern 4.1. Paleogeography of Dinaric region 4.2. Dinaric Carbonate Platform (External Dinarides) - litostratigraphic units 4.3. Tectonic 5. Geomorphology and karstification 5.1. Karstification process 5.2. Karstic features 5.2.1. Surface karstic features 5.2.2. Potholes and caves 6. Aquifer systems 6.1. Aquifers classification and distribution 7. Groundwater basins 7.1. Regional groundwater direction 7.2. Grounwater bodies ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC OVERVIEW 1. Administrative boundaries 2. Population and demography 3. Tourism 4. Land use 5. Sources of income 6. Agriculture 7. Roads 8. Industries 9. Mining sites 10. Solid waste disposal 11. Wastewater treatment Protection and Sustainable Use of the Dinaric Karst Transboundary Aquifer System 12. Dams and Hydropower Plants 13. Protected areas 14. Karstic caves 15. Groundwater dependent ecosystems 16. Water use 17. Surface water quality LEGAL AND INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK AND POLICY 1. Introduction 2. Updated report on legal, institutional and policy framework in Croatia 3.
  • Sava River Basin Project

    Sava River Basin Project

    Protection of Biodiversity of the Sava River Basin Floodplains International (WI) with technical support from Orbicon (DK) have jointly initiated the Protection of Biodiversity of the Sava River Basin Floodplains project to support the Sava Basin countries in identifying, designating and managing the biological and landscape diversity along the Sava River and in supporting the implementation of the EU Birds and Habitats Directives. The proposed project will demonstrate innovative protection and management schemes that seek to combine viable land use practices, biodiversity protection and management and flood management. Du{ka Dimovi} Donors and Partners The project is financially supported by the LIFE-Third countries programme and the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation. The international project applicant responsible for Lonjsko polje Nature Park, Croatia / Park, Croatia Lonjsko polje Nature executing the project is IUCN Regional The Sava River found in the central Sava basin with a Office for Europe. Throughout the mosaic of natural floodplains and project, the IUCN together with the WI The Sava River is the second largest cultural landscapes formed by will be responsible for the project tributary to the Danube River and is of traditional land-use patterns typical to management, while the partner institu- biological significance because of its the river valleys of Central Europe in the tions from the Sava countries - the outstanding biological and landscape past. The Sava River is considered by Center for Ecology and Natural diversity. It hosts the largest complex of nature conservationists and scientists to Resources of the Faculty of Science in alluvial floodplain wetlands in the be one of the “Crown Jewels” of Sarajevo, the Agricultural Institute of Danube basin and the largest lowland European nature and has been selected Republic of Srpska, the State Institute forests.
  • Evaluation of Wetlands and Floodplain Areas in the Danube River Basin Final Report May 1999

    Evaluation of Wetlands and Floodplain Areas in the Danube River Basin Final Report May 1999

    DANUBE POLLUTION REDUCTION PROGRAMME EVALUATION OF WETLANDS AND FLOODPLAIN AREAS IN THE DANUBE RIVER BASIN FINAL REPORT MAY 1999 Programme Coordination Unit UNDP/GEF Assistance prepared by WWF Danube-Carpathian-Programme and WWF-Auen-Institut (Germany) DANUBE POLLUTION REDUCTION PROGRAMME EVALUATION OF WETLANDS AND FLOODPLAIN AREAS IN THE DANUBE RIVER BASIN FINAL REPORT MAY 1999 Programme Coordination Unit UNDP/GEF Assistance prepared by WWF Danube-Carpathian-Programme and WWF-Auen-Institut (Germany) Preface The "Evaluation of Wetlands and Flkoodplain Areas in the Danube River Basin" study was prepared in the frame of the Danube Pollution Reduction Programme (PRP). The Study has been undertaken to define priority wetland and floodplain rehabilitation sites as a component of the Pollution reduction Programme. The present report addresses the identification of former floodplains and wetlands in the Danube River Basin, as well as the description of the current status and evaluation of the ecological importance of the potential for rehabilitation. Based on this evaluation, 17 wetland/floodplain sites have been identified for rehabilitation considering their ecological importance, their nutrient removal capacity and their role in flood protection. Most of the identified wetlands will require transboundary cooperation and represent an important first step in retoring the ecological balance in the Danube River Basin. The results are presented in the form of thematic maps that can be found in Annex I of the study. The study was prepared by the WWF-Danube-Carpathian-Programme and the WWF-Auen-Institut (Institute for Floodplains Ecology, WWF-Germany), under the guidance of the UNDP/GEF team of experts of the Danube Programme Coordination Unit (DPCU) in Vienna, Austria.
  • Vina Croatia

    Vina Croatia

    Wines of CROATIA unique and exciting Croatia as a AUSTRIA modern country HUNGARY SLOVENIA CROATIA Croatia, having been eager to experience immediate changes, success and recognition, has, at the beginning of a new decade, totally altered its approach to life and business. A strong desire to earn quick money as well as rapid trade expansion have been replaced by more moderate, longer-term investment projects in the areas of viticulture, rural tourism, family hotels, fisheries, olive growing, ecological agriculture and superior restaurants. BOSNIA & The strong first impression of international brands has been replaced by turning to traditional HERZEGOVINA products, having their origins in a deep historic heritage. The expansion of fast-food chains was brought to a halt in the mid-1990’s as multinational companies understood that investment would not be returned as quickly as had been planned. More ambitious restaurants transformed into centres of hedonism, whereas small, thematic ones offering several fresh and well-prepared dishes are visited every day. Tradition and a return to nature are now popular ITALY Viticulture has been fully developed. Having superior technology at their disposal, a new generation of well-educated winemakers show firm personal convictions and aims with clear goals. The rapid growth of international wine varietals has been hindered while local varietals that were almost on the verge of extinction, have gradually gained in importance. Not only have the most prominent European regions shared their experience, but the world’s renowned wine experts have offered their consulting services. Biodynamic movement has been very brisk with every wine region bursting with life.
  • Nature Parks in the Republic of Croatia

    Nature Parks in the Republic of Croatia

    Cigrovski-Detelić B., Tutić D., Udovičić D. (2010). Nature Parks in the Republic of Croatia. In: D. Kereković (ed.). Space, Heritage & Future. Croatian Information Technology Association – GIS Forum, University of Silesia, Zagreb, 82-92. NATURE PARKS IN THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA Brankica Cigrovski-Detelić, Dražen Tutić, Dino Udovičić University of Zagreb, Faculty of geodesy Kačićeva 26, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia Abstract Environmental protection, the preservation of biological and landscape diversity, and rational usage of natural resources and energy in the most convenient way are the basic conditions of healthy life and the fundament of a sustainable development of every country. The nature and natural values are of great interest for the Republic of Croatia, and they are particularly protected, which is also legally regulated. There are altogether 11 nature parks in the Republic of Croatia: Biokovo, Kopački rit, Lonjsko polje, Medvednica, Papuk, Telašćica, Velebit, Vranko Lake and Učka. The paper presents the particularities and geographic position of all Croatian nature parks. Key words: Nature Park, natural resources, environmental protection 1. INTRODUCTION Nature Park is, according to the Environmental Protection Act of the Republic of Croatia (National Gazette 162/03) regionally natural or partly cultivated land and/or sea area with ecological properties of international or national significance, with emphasized landscape, educational, cultural and historical, and tourist and recreation values. In the Republic of Croatia there are altogether 11 nature parks: Nature Park Biokovo, Nature Par Kopački rit, Nature Park Lonjsko polje, Nature Park Medvednica, Nature Park Papuk, Nature Park Telaščica, Nature Park Velebit, Nature Park Vransko Lake, Nature Park Učka, Nature Park Žumberak – Samobor Mountains and Nature Park Lastovo islands.
  • Park Prirode Velebit

    Park Prirode Velebit

    Park prirode Velebit Dužina: 145 km, Vratnik – okuka Zrmanje Širina: Prosječna 14 km, max. 30 km, min. 10km. Površina 2 270 km2 Vrhova: 130 prosječne visine 1370 m. Sjeverni Velebit - vrhovi dosežu gotovo 1700 m (Mali Rajinac 1699 m), Srednji Velebit - vrhovi prelaze 1600 m (Šatorina 1624 m, Ograđenik 1604 m, Ograđenica 1614 m), Južni Velebit - vrhovi 1700 - 1758 m (Babin vrh 1723 m, Vaganski vrh 1757 m, Segestin 1715 m, Malovan 1709 m, Sveto brdo 1751 m) Park prirode Velebit • Ostala zaštićena područja unutar Parka prirode „Velebit“ temeljem upisnika zaštićenih područja Ministarstva kulture: • Kategorija zaštite Lokalitet • Strogi rezervati: Hajdučki i Rožanski kukovi (unutar granica NP "Sjeverni Velebit") • Botanički rezervati: Zavižan – Balinovac – Zavižanska kosa Visibaba (unutar granica NP "Sjeverni Velebit") • Rezervat šumske vegetacije: Šuma Štirovača na Srednjem Velebitu • Posebni geomorfološki rezervat: Cerovačke špilje kod Gračaca • Spomenici prirode: Velnačka glavica (paleontološki) • Značajni krajobraz: Zaljev Zavratnica (geomorfološki) Park prirode Velebit • KLIMA • Primorska padina – submediteranska • Kontinentalna padina – kontinentalna • Oborina • Vršni dio – max. južni Velebit > 3000 mm, • Podnožje – primorska padina prosječno 1188mm lička padina prosječno 1884 mm • Broj dana s maglom – 187 • Broj dana sa snijegom iznad 30 cm; • Primorska padina 0 • Lička padina 20-40 • Vršni dio 70 • Najviši vrhovi >100 Park prirode Velebit • Velebit – područje Nacionalne ekološke mreže – Važna područja za divlje svojte i stanišne tipove 31. Klepina duliba • 1. Cerovačka špilja donja 32. Ramino korito • 2. Cerovačka špilja gornja 33. Sadikovac • 3.Čavle špilja 34. Visočica • 4. Ivina jama 35. Veliki i Mali Kozjak • 5. Jama II kod Velikih Brisnica 36. Borov vrh • 6. Jama iznad Kugine kuće 37. Rončević dolac • 7.
  • Ana Kurbalija PREGLED ENTOMOFAUNE MOČVARNIH

    Ana Kurbalija PREGLED ENTOMOFAUNE MOČVARNIH

    SVEUČILIŠTE JOSIPA JURJA STROSSMAYERA U OSIJEKU I INSTITUT RUĐER BOŠKOVI Ć, ZAGREB Poslijediplomski sveučilišni interdisciplinarni specijalisti čki studij ZAŠTITA PRIRODE I OKOLIŠA Ana Kurbalija PREGLED ENTOMOFAUNE MOČVARNIH STANIŠTA OD MEĐUNARODNOG ZNAČENJA U REPUBLICI HRVATSKOJ Specijalistički rad Osijek, 2012. TEMELJNA DOKUMENTACIJSKA KARTICA Sveučilište Josipa Jurja Strossmayera u Osijeku Specijalistički rad Institit Ruđer Boškovi ć, Zagreb Poslijediplomski sveučilišni interdisciplinarni specijalisti čki studij zaštita prirode i okoliša Znanstveno područje: Prirodne znanosti Znanstveno polje: Biologija PREGLED ENTOMOFAUNE MOČVARNIH STANIŠTA OD ME ĐUNARODNOG ZNAČENJA U REPUBLICI HRVATSKOJ Ana Kurbalija Rad je izrađen na Odjelu za biologiju, Sveučilišta Josipa Jurja Strossmayera u Osijeku Mentor: izv.prof. dr. sc. Stjepan Krčmar U ovom radu je istražen kvalitativni sastav entomof aune na četiri močvarna staništa od me đunarodnog značenja u Republici Hrvatskoj. To su Park prirode Kopački rit, Park prirode Lonjsko polje, Delta rijeke Neretve i Crna Mlaka. Glavni cilj specijalističkog rada je objediniti sve objavljene i neobjavljene podatke o nalazima vrsta kukaca na ova četiri močvarna staništa te kvalitativno usporediti entomofau nu pomoću Sörensonovog indexa faunističke sličnosti. Na području Parka prirode Kopački rit utvrđeno je ukupno 866 vrsta kukaca razvrstanih u 84 porodice i 513 rodova. Na području Parka prirode Lonjsko polje utvrđeno je 513 vrsta kukaca razvrstanih u 24 porodice i 89 rodova. Na području delte rijeke Neretve utvrđeno je ukupno 348 vrsta kukaca razvrstanih u 89 porodica i 227 rodova. Za područje Crne Mlake nije bilo dostupne literature o nalazima kukaca. Velika vrijednost Sörensonovog indexa od 80,85% ukazuje na veliku faunističku sličnost između faune obada Kopačkoga rita i Lonjskoga polja. Najmanja sličnost u fauni obada utvrđena je između močvarnih staništa Lonjskog polja i delte rijeke Neretve, a iznosi 41,37%.
  • Trajectories of Croatian Jesuit Historiography Brnardic, Teodora Shek

    Trajectories of Croatian Jesuit Historiography Brnardic, Teodora Shek

    From Acceptance to Animosity: Trajectories of Croatian Jesuit Historiography Brnardic, Teodora Shek Teodora Shek Brnardić [email protected] Last modified: March 2018 Introduction The emergence of a Croatian historiography of the Society of Jesus took place in the often virulently anti-Jesuit and anti-clerical atmosphere that was prevalent in Croatia in the second half of the nineteenth and first half of the twentieth century. This period represented a historical crisis for the Jesuit order in Croatia, one that provoked controversies that were largely absent in the pre-suppression period, unlike in many other countries where such disputes had existed ever since the sixteenth century. In 1932, Miroslav Vanino, S.J. (1879–1965) launched a scholarly journal entitled Vrela i prinosi: Zbornik za povijest isusovačkog reda u hrvatskim krajevima (Sources and contributions: Collected papers on the history of the Jesuit order in the Croatian lands),1 which marked a turning point in the creation of a Croatian Jesuit historiography. In doing so, Vanino intended to revise the prevailing view of the pre-suppression Jesuits, who were often accused of behaving in an “anti-national” way. This latter view had become widespread among the educated Croatian elite, particularly during the Austro-Hungarian fin-de-siècle. Vanino’s journal accordingly sought to correct this politically biased interpretation of the Jesuits’ role in Croatian history with articles written by both Jesuit and non-Jesuit contributors.2 The journal would provide the foundation for a source-based, critical history of the Society of Jesus in the Croatian lands and of its relations with the Croats.
  • Distribution of the Invasive Bivalve Sinanodonta Woodiana (Lea, 1834) in Croatia

    Distribution of the Invasive Bivalve Sinanodonta Woodiana (Lea, 1834) in Croatia

    Aquatic Invasions (2011) Volume 6, Supplement 1: S119–S124 doi: 10.3391/ai.2011.6.S1.027 Open Access © 2011 The Author(s). Journal compilation © 2011 REABIC Aquatic Invasions Records Distribution of the invasive bivalve Sinanodonta woodiana (Lea, 1834) in Croatia Jasna Lajtner* and Petar Crnčan Department of Zoology, Division of Biology, Faculty of Science, University of Zagreb, Rooseveltov trg 6, HR-10000 Zagreb, Croatia E-mail: [email protected] (JL), [email protected] (PC) *Corresponding author Received: 7 June 2011 / Accepted: 29 September 2011 / Published online: 12 October 2011 Abstract The Chinese pond mussel Sinanodonta woodiana is an invasive bivalve species present in the flowing and standing waters of most of Europe. Field research conducted from 2007 to 2011 indicated that this species has colonised the entire eastern part of Croatia, and that its spread westward is continuing. During our study, S. woodiana was recorded at 54 localities. Key words: Chinese pond mussel, Sinanodonta woodiana, Unionidae, invasive species, Croatia 2009), and most recently in the United States Introduction (Bogan et al. 2011). It is believed that the primary pathway of The Chinese pond mussel Sinanodonta woodiana introduction of this species to Europe was with (Lea, 1834) is a species native to East and Asian fish species, such as silver carp (Hypo- South–East Asia. Some authors have placed this phthalmichthys molitrix Valenciennes, 1844), species within the order Anodonta though newer bighead carp (Aristichthys nobilis Ricardson, taxonomic research has placed it in the order 1844) and grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella Sinanodonta (Bogatov and Sayenko 2002). In Valenciennes, 1844), primarily introduced to Europe it was first discovered in Romanian fish regulate aquatic vegetation in fish ponds farms at Cefa-Oradea in 1979 (Sàrkàny-Kiss (Paunovic et al.
  • Procjena Dobrobiti Zaštićenih Područja (PA-BAT) U Hrvatskoj SADRŽAJ Fan Widstrand

    Procjena Dobrobiti Zaštićenih Područja (PA-BAT) U Hrvatskoj SADRŽAJ Fan Widstrand

    REPORT ADRIA 2017 Procjena dobrobiti zaštićenih područja (PA-BAT) u Hrvatskoj SADRŽAJ fan Widstrand UVOD 4 METODOLOGIJA 4 REZULTATI I RASPRAVA 7 GLAVNE EKONOMSKE VRIJEDNOSTI 12 TURIZAM 14 VODA 17 Promatranje ptica sve je češća turistička atrakcija u zaštićenim područjima © Staf RADNA MJESTA I ZAŠTITA PRIRODE 18 ŠUMARSTVO 21 TIJEK PRIHODA DIONICIMA 22 ZAŠTIĆENIH PODRUČJA GLAVNI POTENCIJALI 24 VAŽNOST DIJALOGA S DIONICIMA 27 IZAZOVI 28 ZAKLJUČAK 38 Izdavač: WWF Adria, Budmanijeva 5, 10 000 Zagreb, Hrvatska Za izdavača: Martin Šolar, direktor WWF Adria Autorice: Andrea Štefan i Kasandra-Zorica Ivanić Fotografija na naslovnoj stranici: Nacionalni park Kornati © Novena d.o.o. Dizajn: Ivan Antunović Kontakt: [email protected] [email protected] Tiskano na ekološki prihvatljivom papiru Veljača, 2017. Uvod Vizija je WWF-a1 osigurati da valjana procjena vrijednosti zaštićenih Sudionici radionica uz pomoć te metodologije ocjenjuju ekonomske područja rezultira većim interesom, kvalitetnijim investicijama i i neekonomske/egzistencijalne vrijednosti (zadovoljavanje osnovnih boljom očuvanosti prirodnih vrijednosti. Procjena usluga ekosusta- životnih potreba) u smislu njihovih dobrobiti za razne dionike/kori- va koje pružaju zaštićena područja dugoročno je važna za lokalno i snike. Dobrobiti se ocjenjuju na šest mogućih razina: nema dobrobiti, nacionalno gospodarstvo. Potrebne su godine rada na utvrđivanju mala ili značajna egzistencijalna dobrobit, mala ili značajna ekonomska vrijednosti, uključivanju ključnih donositelja odluka, promjeni dobrobit i potencijalna dobrobit. politika i razvoja gospodarskih modela u čije su razvojne planove uključene prirodne vrijednosti. WWF je izradio procjenu koja može PA-BAT je osmišljen kako bi ga koristili upravljači zaštićenih područja pružiti početnu informaciju o stavu dionika o stvarnim i potencijal- te kako bi u suradnji s ostalim dionicima odredili važne vrijednosti i nim vrijednostima zaštićenih područja, a s ciljem što skorije integra- dobrobiti koje one donose dionicima.