FEATURES and FIGURES of the PAST V.I. Gurko

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

FEATURES and FIGURES of the PAST V.I. Gurko FEATURES AND FIGURES OF THE PAST V.I. Gurko Vladimir Gurko, coming from a family which gave distinguished service to the Russian empire, entered public service after graduating from the Moscow Uni­ versity at the age of 23. Early in the reign of Nicholas II he was appointed to the Imperial Chancellery and in 1902 was ap­ pointed Manager of the Peasant Section and later Assistant Minister of the In­ terior. He was gifted and brilliant, a clever, energetic and extraordinarily hard-work­ ing bureaucrat, and his ability was early recognized by his contemporaries. Writ­ ing of his first speech as government spokesman on the agrarian question, Sen­ ator Glinka recalls: "The unsuccessful speeches of the government representa­ tives before the noisy assembly, the feel-. ing of bewilderment, the crushing con­ fusion-and then V. I. Gurka's speech. I remember his slight stature, his loud, harsh voice. Every sentence was charged with feeling, with a biting sarcasm. • • • The sweeping fire of his eloquence re­ vealed him to be a capable parliamentary fighter. This speech proved his outstand- ing political genius." - This is the man who from first-hand experience gives us this inside story of the Russian government, its leading personali­ ties, and its relations with the Russian public from the accession of Nicholas II to the eve of the Revolution of 1917. From personal observation the author describes the composition and activities of such in­ stitutions as the State Council, the Impe­ rial Chancellery, the various ministries, and the State Duma; he makes revealing characterizations of such influential fig­ ures of the time as Witte, Plehve, Stoly­ pin, Durnovo, Kokovtsov, Goremykin, and many others, and discusses their relations (Continued on back flap of jacket) The Hoover Library on War, Revolution, and Peace Publication No. 14 Features and Figures of the Past PUBLISHED UNDER AUTHORITY OF THE DIRECTORS OF THE HOOVER LIBRARY ON WAR, REVOLUTION, AND PEACE VLADIMIR IOSIFOVICH GURKO The Hoover Library on War, Revolution, and .Peace Publication No. 14 FEATURES AND FIGURES OF THE PAST GOVERNMENT AND OPINION IN THE REIGN OF NICHOLAS II By V.I. GURKO. Late Assistant Minister of the Interior and Member of the Russian State Council Edited by J. E. WALLACE STERLING XENIA JOUKOFF EUDIN H. H. FISHER Translated by LAURA MATVEEV 1939 STANFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS STANFORD UNIVERSITY, CALIFORNIA LONDON: HUMPHREY MILFORD OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS STANFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS STANFORD UNIVERSITY, CALIFORNIA LONDON: HUMPHREY MILFORD OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS THE BAitER AND TAYLOR COMPANY 55 FIFrH AVENUE, NEW YORE THE MARUZEN COMPANY TOX::YO, OSAKA, KYOTO, SENDAI COPYRIGHT 1939 BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY PRINTED AND BOUND IN THE UNITED &TATES ' OF AMERICA BY STANFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS EDITOR'S PREFACE LADIMIR IosiFOVICH GuRKO came of a family which gave distinguished service to the Russian Empire. His grand­ V father, V. I. Gurka, was an officer in the Napoleonic wars. His father, Field Marshal I. V. Gurka (1828-1901), was one of the principal Russian commanders in the ~usso-Turkish War of 1877- 78 and was later Governor-General and Commander of the Troops in Poland. The author's maternal grandmother, Countess Sailhas de Tournemire (Elizaveta Vasilievna Sukhevo-Kobylina), con­ tributed under the name Evgenia Tur to Sovremennik, Russkii Vest­ nik, and Russkaia Rech, and wrote a number of novels. She was the friend of Granovsky, Turgenev, Afanasiev, and other l~terary figures of the mid-century. His brother, General Vasilii Iosifovich Gurka,_ held many important posts during the World War, including those of Acting Chief of the Imperial General Staff and Commander of the Western Group of Armies. In 1885, at the age of twenty-three, V. I. Gurko graduated from Moscow University, and immediately entered public service in Poland, first as commissioner for rural affairs and later as an as­ sistant to his father, the Governor-General in Warsaw. In these first years of his career Gurka showed the direction of his interest and the bent of his mind. With characteristic energy he turned to the study of agrarian problems, publishing in 1887 Dvorianskoe zemlevladenie v sviazi s mestnoi reformoi ("Nobility Landowner­ ship in Connection with Local Reform"), and ten years later Ocherki Privisliania ("Sketches of the Vistula Region"). Early in the reign of Nicholas II, Gurko was appointed to the Imperial Chancellery, an institution which had been the training school of many Russian statesmen and in which he had the oppor­ tunity to observe the working and membership of the State Council, which he here so effectively describes. Gurko's ability was recog­ nized by the head of the Chancellery, the then Imperial Secretary, V. K. Plehve, but his developing bureaucratic career did not turn Gurka from his interest in peasant and agrarian affairs. On the large estates owned by his wife in Voronezh Gubernia he carried on a model farm, studied at first hand the conditions of life and the problems of the peasants, and in 1902 published Ustoi v vi FEATURES AND FIGURES OF THE PAST narodnago khoziaistva Rossii ("Principles of People's Eco1wmy of Russid'). When Plehve became Minister of the Interior in 1902 he ap­ pointed Gurko Manager of the Peasant Section. This appointment was significant, for at the time the government was devoting par­ ticular attention to the problems of agriculture and the condition of the peasants. In this office, and later as Assistant Minister of the Interior, Gurko took a prominent part in discussions, interministe­ rial conferences, and the formulation of projects relating to rural administration and agrarian reforms. But his opportunities to ob- , serve the involved process of Imperial Government were not, of course, confined to this important question. From such an advan­ tageous post of observation in the ministry most influential in the direction of government policy, Gurko saw the rise and fall of the political fortunes of Witte, Plehve, Sviatopolk-Mirsky, Durnovo, and Goremykin, and he noted the personal traits and contributions of many less-known figures. He saw the blundering progress of Russia's costly adventure in the Far East and the fumbling meas­ ures to meet the rising tide of unrest among peasants, workers, and liberals. With his keen mind, his talent for character portrayal, and, it may be added, an eye for the frailties of human nature, Gurko brings to life the scene of the historic years 1902-1906- the clash of personalities and opinions, and the struggle to control and guide the tremendous forces in the social and economic life of the country. One of the high points of Gurko's public career at this time was his appearance in the First Duma as government spokesman on the agrarian question. Writing of this occasion, Senator G. V. Glinka recalls: "The unsuccessful speeches of the government rep­ resentatives before the noisy assembly, the feeling of bewilderment, the crushing confusion-and then V. I. Gurko's speech. I re­ member his slight stature, his loud, harsh voice. Every sentence was charged with feeling, with a biting sarcasm. The sweep­ ing fire of his eloquence revealed him to be a capable parliamentary fighter.- This speech proved his outstanding political genius, but at the same time it aroused great jealousy among those who sided with him and was never forgotten by his political foes." In 1906 Gurko published his fourth book, Otryvochnyia mysli po agrarnomu voprosu ("Random Thoughts on the Agrarian Ques­ tion"). In the same year his bureaucratic career ended when he was EDITOR'S PREFACE vii I I charged with having exceeded his authority in making with a cer- tain Lidval, who failed to carry out his agreement, a contract to supply grain to regions experiencing an acute food shortage. Gurka's political adversaries and the opposition parties in general naturally made the most of this affair; but there were many, in­ cluding some of other political camps, who believed that injustice had been done. Referring to this affair, P. B. Struve later wrote: "Although I did not know Gurko personally, my conscience has long prompted me to see the injustice of this accusation. Gurka's path, it seems, somehow crossed that of P. A. Stolypin. In reality they were pursuing the same aim and were permeated with the same spirit. But their personal ways crossed and the historical flow of events carried Stolypin forward and pushed Gurko back. But fate was not just to Gurko, and the fact should be remembered that 'Stolypin's work,' aiming at a Russian peas­ antry strongly settled on the land, was helped by the gifted and brilliant Gurko. The historian who studies the documents will rec­ ognize the role and significance of Stolypin's land reform and of Stolypin himself and of Gurko, and lastly, of the partial realization of their program by A. V. Krivoshein. It remains to state, .... that from a purely historical point of view these three names should be recorded together." Gurka's forced retirement from the government service did not end his public life. In 1909 he published Nashe gosudarsvennoe i narodnoe khoziaistvo ("Our State and People's Economy"). Dur­ ing this year also he returned to live on his family estate in Tver Gubernia, to begin what was in fact a new career as a member of the zemstvo. In this he faced a difficult situation. Not only was he a former bureaucrat-and all bureaucrats were regarded with sus­ picion by the zemstvo men-but he had been one of the most forth­ right critics of the policies of the Cadet party, and this party was very strong throughout the Tver zemstvo organizations. Gurlro ' threw himself into provincial work with energy and intelligence, and so successfully overcame local and party prejudice that in 1912 his election to the Fourth State Duma was prevented only by pressure from St.
Recommended publications
  • Russian Museums Visit More Than 80 Million Visitors, 1/3 of Who Are Visitors Under 18
    Moscow 4 There are more than 3000 museums (and about 72 000 museum workers) in Russian Moscow region 92 Federation, not including school and company museums. Every year Russian museums visit more than 80 million visitors, 1/3 of who are visitors under 18 There are about 650 individual and institutional members in ICOM Russia. During two last St. Petersburg 117 years ICOM Russia membership was rapidly increasing more than 20% (or about 100 new members) a year Northwestern region 160 You will find the information aboutICOM Russia members in this book. All members (individual and institutional) are divided in two big groups – Museums which are institutional members of ICOM or are represented by individual members and Organizations. All the museums in this book are distributed by regional principle. Organizations are structured in profile groups Central region 192 Volga river region 224 Many thanks to all the museums who offered their help and assistance in the making of this collection South of Russia 258 Special thanks to Urals 270 Museum creation and consulting Culture heritage security in Russia with 3M(tm)Novec(tm)1230 Siberia and Far East 284 © ICOM Russia, 2012 Organizations 322 © K. Novokhatko, A. Gnedovsky, N. Kazantseva, O. Guzewska – compiling, translation, editing, 2012 [email protected] www.icom.org.ru © Leo Tolstoy museum-estate “Yasnaya Polyana”, design, 2012 Moscow MOSCOW A. N. SCRiAbiN MEMORiAl Capital of Russia. Major political, economic, cultural, scientific, religious, financial, educational, and transportation center of Russia and the continent MUSEUM Highlights: First reference to Moscow dates from 1147 when Moscow was already a pretty big town.
    [Show full text]
  • Eugene Miakinkov
    Russian Military Culture during the Reigns of Catherine II and Paul I, 1762-1801 by Eugene Miakinkov A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History Department of History and Classics University of Alberta ©Eugene Miakinkov, 2015 Abstract This study explores the shape and development of military culture during the reign of Catherine II. Next to the institutions of the autocracy and the Orthodox Church, the military occupied the most important position in imperial Russia, especially in the eighteenth century. Rather than analyzing the military as an institution or a fighting force, this dissertation uses the tools of cultural history to explore its attitudes, values, aspirations, tensions, and beliefs. Patronage and education served to introduce a generation of young nobles to the world of the military culture, and expose it to its values of respect, hierarchy, subordination, but also the importance of professional knowledge. Merit is a crucial component in any military, and Catherine’s military culture had to resolve the tensions between the idea of meritocracy and seniority. All of the above ideas and dilemmas were expressed in a number of military texts that began to appear during Catherine’s reign. It was during that time that the military culture acquired the cultural, political, and intellectual space to develop – a space I label the “military public sphere”. This development was most clearly evident in the publication, by Russian authors, of a range of military literature for the first time in this era. The military culture was also reflected in the symbolic means used by the senior commanders to convey and reinforce its values in the army.
    [Show full text]
  • Woman, Nature, and Equality in Russian Sentimentalism
    Zurich Open Repository and Archive University of Zurich Main Library Strickhofstrasse 39 CH-8057 Zurich www.zora.uzh.ch Year: 2016 Disrupted Idylls: Nature, Equality, and the Feminine in Sentimentalist Russian Women’s Writing (Mariia Pospelova, Mariia Bolotnikova, and Anna Naumova) Stohler, Ursula DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/slr.2018.178 Other titles: With translations by Emily Lygo Posted at the Zurich Open Repository and Archive, University of Zurich ZORA URL: https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-120423 Monograph Accepted Version Originally published at: Stohler, Ursula (2016). Disrupted Idylls: Nature, Equality, and the Feminine in Sentimentalist Russian Women’s Writing (Mariia Pospelova, Mariia Bolotnikova, and Anna Naumova). Bern: Peter Lang. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/slr.2018.178 1 Ursula Stohler Disrupted Idylls: Nature, Equality, and the Feminine in Sentimentalist Russian Women’s Writing (Mariia Pospelova, Mariia Bolotnikova, and Anna Naumova) With translations by Emily Lygo This book is a revised version of my dissertation, Russian Women Writers of the 1800– 1820s and the Response to Sentimentalist Literary Conventions of Nature, the Feminine, and Writing: Mariia Pospelova, Mariia Bolotnikova, and Anna Naumova, submitted to the University of Exeter as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Russian Studies, June 2005 2 Abstract This study explores the ways in which Russian women writers responded to Sentimentalist conventions of authorship, challenging their conceptualisation of women as mute and passive beings. Its particular focus is on the works by Anna Naumova, Mariia Pospelova and Mariia Bolotnikova, three late-18th- and early-19th- century Russian women authors who have only recently begun to receive some slight scholarly attention from Western European researchers in Russian Women’s Studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Redistributions and the Russian Peasant Commune in the Late-Imperial Period
    Land Redistributions and the Russian Peasant Commune in the Late-Imperial Period Steven Nafziger1 Preliminary and Incomplete Comments welcome and encouraged. Version: December, 2004 1Department of Economics, Yale University, [email protected]. This paper forms part of a larger project on the economics of rural development in Russia between 1861 and 1917. Research for this project was supported in part by the Title VIII Combined Research and Language Training Program, which is funded by the U.S. State Department and admin- istered by the American Councils for International Education: ACTR/ACCELS. The opinions expressed herein are the author’s and do not necessarily express the views of either the State Department or American Councils. Further support from the Economic History Association, the Sasakawa Foundation, Yale’s Economic Growth Center, and the Yale Center for Interna- tional and Area Studies is very much appreciated. The comments and suggestions of Tracy Dennison, Daniel Field, Timothy Guinnane, Mark Harrison, Valery Lazarev, Carol Leonard, Jason Long, Angela Micah, Carolyn Moehling, Benjamin Polak, Christopher Udry, and partic- ipants at the 2004 World Cliometric Congress, the 2004 Economic History Association meet- ings, and seminars at Yale and Harvard Universities were extremely helpful. Errors remain the exclusive property of the author. Abstract This paper investigates the motivations for, and effects of, intra-community land re- distributions by Russian peasants in the 19th century. Scholars such as Alexander Gerschenkron have emphasized that such repartitions of arable land create negative investment and innovation incentives and played a major role in hampering rural de- velopment in the period after serfdom.
    [Show full text]
  • Mikhail Shcherbatov Introduction.Pdf
    French in the education of the nobility: Mikhail Shcherbatov’s letters to his son Dmitrii Introduction Prince Mikhail Shcherbatov Prince Mikhail Mikhailovich Shcherbatov (1733-90) was a member of a large and ancient noble family that claimed to be descended from Riurik, the Norseman who, according to the Russian chronicles, had founded the Russian state in 862. One of Mikhail’s forebears, Ivan Andreevich Shcherbatov, who happened to become his father-in-law (and who also features in this corpus of primary source texts), had served as a diplomat in London in the reigns of Anne and Elizabeth. Mikhail’s father had seen military service in the wars of Peter I (the Great) against the Turks and the Swedes and had risen to the rank of Major-General. Mikhail himself, as a deputy elected by the nobility of the District of Iaroslavl, played a prominent role in the deliberations of the Legislative Commission set up in 1767 by Catherine II (the Great) with the supposed aim of drawing up a new code of laws and, even more ambitiously, fundamental political laws informed by the ideas of western thinkers of the Age of Enlightenment, above all Montesquieu.1 Resentful of the recent elevation of commoners such as Peter’s favourite, Prince Aleksandr Menshikov (1673-1729), Shcherbatov insisted on the pre-eminence of the high nobility of ancient lineage and made every effort to halt the rise of the newer service gentry. He accordingly opposed the meritocratic principle which is embodied in the Table of Ranks that Peter introduced in 1722 and which was favoured as a criterion for admission to and status in the nobility by many notable Russian writers and thinkers of the eighteenth century, including the satirist and diplomat Antiokh Kantemir and, in Shcherbatov’s own age, the dramatist Denis Fonvizin (1744 or 1745-92).
    [Show full text]
  • Fifth International Financial University Forum Tentative PROGRAM Tues., 27 November 2018 Lobby, 2Nd Floor, 9:00 – 10:00 Registration Leningradsky Prospekt, 51 Bld
    How to Break into the Top Five of the Leading World Economies? Fifth International Financial University Forum Tentative PROGRAM Tues., 27 November 2018 Lobby, 2nd floor, 9:00 – 10:00 Registration Leningradsky Prospekt, 51 bld. 1 10:00-12:40 Plenary session Leningradsky Speakers Prospekt, 51, bld.1, Anton Siluanov, First Deputy Chairman of the Government of the Assembly Hall Russian Federation, Minister, Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation Giulio Carlo Danilo Tremonti, Italian politician, former Minister of Economy and Finance Sergei Bodrunov, President, Free Economic Society of Russia Tatiana Golikova, Deputy Chairperson of the Government of the Russian Federation for Social Policy Aleksei Gordeyev, Deputy Chairman of the Government of the Russian Federation for Agro-Industrial Sector, Natural Resources and Environment Protection Issues Mikhail Kotyukov, Minister of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation Andrei Makarov, Chairman, State Duma Committee for Budget and Taxes, Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation Andrei Kostin, President and Chairman of the Board, VTB Bank Aleksei Kudrin, Chairman, Accounts Chamber of the Russian Federation Aleksandr Shokhin, President, Russian Union of Industrialists and Entrepreneurs 12:40-13:00 Quality of Life Financial University Award ceremony 14:00-16:00 Open lecture by Jean Tirole, holder of the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences (2014) Wed., 28 November 2018 10:00-13:00 Session Leningradsky Where can We Obtain the Funds for the Breakthrough? Public Prospekt, 55, Monetary and Fiscal Policy room 213 Moderators: A.A. Khandryuev, M.A. Abramova Person in charge S.P. Solyannikova, Head, Department of Public Finance, Financial University [email protected] Participants M.Yu.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Article (PDF)
    5th International Conference on Accounting, Auditing, and Taxation (ICAAT 2016) THE FORMATION OF ACCOUNTING EDUCATION IN RUSSIA Alexander V. Kuznetsov Kuban State University, Russia Marina M. Gurskaya Kuban State University, Russia Mikhail I. Kuter Kuban State University, Russia Abstract The purpose of the paper is to research into the characteristic features of the evolution of ac- counting education in Russia, to identify the main stages of this historical process and their time limits. The formation of accounting education is considered as a purposeful process be- ing the integral part of the reforms of Peter the Great, and in which the tsar himself played a leading role. It is proved that the training was carried out mainly by means of practical study abroad and mentoring. The story of Ivan Thames, who taught accounting to the youth, as well as of Petr Rychkov, who became the author of the first Russian publication concerning ac- counting, is used as an illustration. The first cases of the use of the adopted in Russia account- ing terminology are presented. The forms of accounting books, applied in the 18th century, are given. The establishment of the first Russian commercial colleges is presented. The character- istic features of the manuals of accounting used in these establishments are discussed. The paper contains historical facts that can be of interest to those who are interested in the history of Russia. Keywords: Accounting education in Russia, history of Russian accounting, commercial col- leges in Russia, first Russian manuals of accounting JEL code: A200, M410, N000 Introduction There is no doubt that the level of qualification of an accountant depends on the quality of his education.
    [Show full text]
  • Mystical Enlightenment in Late Eighteenth-Century Russia
    Mystical Enlightenment in Late Eighteenth-century Russia Author Berg, Andreas Published 2017-06-28 Thesis Type Thesis (PhD Doctorate) School School of Hum, Lang & Soc Sc DOI https://doi.org/10.25904/1912/302 Copyright Statement The author owns the copyright in this thesis, unless stated otherwise. Downloaded from http://hdl.handle.net/10072/370747 Griffith Research Online https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au MYSTICAL ENLIGHTENMENT IN LATE EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY RUSSIA Mr Andreas Berg Bachelor of Arts with Honours School of Humanities, Languages and Social Science Griffith University Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 28.06.2017 THESIS ABSTRACT This thesis will examine the thought of G.S. Skovoroda (1722-1796), M.M. Kheraskov (1733-1807) and I.V. Lopukhin (1756-1816) as constitutive of a Mystical Enlightenment in Russia. Anglophone, and to a lesser extent, Russian literature has often conceived of the Russian Enlightenment as a single project of predominantly rational orientation. However, increasing attention to the presence of multiple Enlightenments in Western Europe and of the importance of religious debates in the formation of various reform movements, necessitate a reconsideration in the role of spirituality in Eighteenth-century Russia. For this reason, this thesis contributes to the recent re-evaluation of the ways in which Russia appropriated foreign discourses, and provides thereby a more detailed account of the extent to which mysticism was able to radically redefine religious, personal and ethical organisational forms. Specifically, this thesis offers an analysis of normative arguments based on three inter-linked concepts of ecclesia, personhood and ascetic ethics.
    [Show full text]
  • Territory, Enclosure, and State Territorial Mode of Production in the Russian Imperial Periphery
    Geogr. Helv., 74, 13–25, 2019 https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-74-13-2019 © Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. supported by Territory, enclosure, and state territorial mode of production in the Russian imperial periphery Vera Smirnova Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 24061, Blacksburg, VA, USA Correspondence: Vera Smirnova ([email protected]) Received: 30 April 2018 – Revised: 22 October 2018 – Accepted: 9 December 2018 – Published: 16 January 2019 Abstract. After the imperial land consolidation acts of 1906, the Russian land commune became a center of territorial struggle where complex alliances of actors, strategies, and representations of territory enacted land enclosure beyond the exclusive control of the state. Using original documentation of Russian imperial land deals obtained in the federal and municipal archives, this study explores how the Russian imperial state and territo- ries in the periphery were dialectically co-produced not only through institutional manipulations, educational programs, and resettlement plans but also through political and public discourses. This paper examines how coalitions of landed nobility and land surveyors, landless serfs, and peasant proprietors used enclosure as con- duits for property violence, accumulation of capital, or, in contrast, as a means of territorial autonomy. Through this example, I bring a territorial dimension into Russian agrarian scholarship by positioning the rural politics of the late imperial period within the global context of capitalist land enclosure. At the same time, by focusing on the reading of territory from the Russian historical perspective, I introduce complexity into the modern territory discourse often found in Western political geographic interpretations.
    [Show full text]
  • Catherine the Great Decree on Serfs
    Catherine The Great Decree On Serfs unheroically.Aseptic and harlot Chalkiest Avi often or uliginous, frit some Derick backstitch never stochastically catheterizes anyor prologises cafeterias! however. Ultracentrifugal and ullaged Jared still mucks his imbroglio Catherine regarded herself or an enlightened monarch. Her on one end? Nowhere is this connection clearer than present the ignorant of manumission, the batter when individuals shifted their position challenge the spectrum between slave a free. French diplomat segure, catherine was great serf emancipation the decree depriving such as described in russia. Peter the great: was on the carriages could. Documents of great work on your submission for his decree on her a decisive steps to cease, the slightest taxes and laws, with the rebellion. Although in reality devoted to button above anyone else, she dreamed endlessly of the joys of a shared love, but whatever position isolated her. How these create a twisted spiral tunnel? Potemkin and Catherine were reportedly only lovers for two years but they remained confidants until he death. John paul probably a special oversight for centuries, paul and very surprised if you meet and customs of a loyal to. He would still held lands and did have children, yenikale and merchants and necessitated the father. Also, the townspeople tended to turn against the junior schools and their pedagogical methods. Like many serf who stood not? Clergymen to catherine on this sample varied only because people who could say, she had great stateswoman, or any polish chivalry and. How catherine on one citizen of. To catherine on the great is sometimes occurred on paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Denmark and Russia: What Can We Learn from the Historical Comparison of Two Great Arctic Agricultural Empires?
    European Historical Economics Society EHES Working Paper | No. 187 | June 2020 Denmark and Russia: What can we learn from the historical comparison of two great Arctic agricultural empires? Elena Korchmina, NYU Abu Dhabi, Higher School of Economics (Moscow) Paul Sharp, University of Southern Denmark, CAGE, CEPR EHES Working Paper | No. 187 | June 2020 Denmark and Russia: What can we learn from the historical comparison of two great Arctic agricultural empires?* Elena Korchmina, NYU Abu Dhabi, Higher School of Economics (Moscow) Paul Sharp1, University of Southern Denmark, CAGE, CEPR Abstract We propose that the “historically relevant” comparison of the Danish and Russian Empires from the early eighteenth century until the First World War presents a useful starting point for a promising research agenda. We motivate the comparison, noting that the two empires enjoyed striking geographical, political and institutional similarities. Beyond this, we also demonstrate that the two empires were bound together by war, royal marriage, and migration. We suggest some examples of what might be investigated, with a particular focus on agriculture, due to its importance to both Danish and Russian economic history. Finally, we zoom in on the role Danish experts played for developing the Russian butter industry. JEL Codes: N01, N53, N73, N93 Keywords: Agriculture, comparative studies, Denmark, Russia * We thank Viktor Borisov and Georgi Derluguian for helpful comments and suggestions. 1 Corresponding author: [email protected] Notice The material presented in the EHES Working Paper Series is property of the author(s) and should be quoted as such. The views expressed in this Paper are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of the EHES or its members 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fall of the Russian Empire: a Spiritual History
    THE FALL OF THE RUSSIAN EMPIRE: A SPIRITUAL HISTORY Vladimir Moss Copyright © Vladimir Moss, 2011. All Rights Reserved. CONTENTS FOREWORD ...........................................................................................................4 INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................6 I. REFORM (1856-1881) .......................................................................................14 The Peace of Paris ................................................................................................14 “The New Man” ..................................................................................................16 The Emancipation of the Serfs .............................................................................19 Supporters and Critics of Emancipation .............................................................24 The Jews under Alexander II ...............................................................................28 Marx and Bakunin...............................................................................................37 Dostoyevsky on Papism and Socialism................................................................42 The Devils ............................................................................................................45 Dostoyevsky on the Terrorists .............................................................................50 Portents of the Antichrist ....................................................................................52
    [Show full text]