Natural Gas and Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Bureau Joint d’audiences Review Panel publiques sur l’environnement Report 230 Cacouna Energy LNG Terminal Project TRANSLATION Inquiry and Public Hearing Report November 2006 The notion of the environment In a perspective of sustainable development, the commissions of the Bureau d’audiences publiques sur l’environnement review projects submitted to them by applying the notion of the environment retained by higher courts, which encompasses biophysical, social, economic, and cultural aspects. Acknowledgements The Panel thanks the people and organizations who collaborated with it, as well as the personnel of the Bureau d’audiences publiques sur l’environnement and the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency who provided the necessary support to produce this report. Publication and Distribution Bureau d’audiences publiques sur l’environnement: Édifice Lomer-Gouin Telephone: 418 643-7447 575, rue Saint-Amable, bureau 2.10 (toll-free): 1 800 463-4732 Québec, Quebec G1R 6A6 Website: www.bape.gouv.qc.ca Email: [email protected] Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency: Place Bell Canada Telephone: 613 957-0700 160, Elgin Street, 22nd floor Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0H3 Website: www.ceaa-acee.gc.ca Email: [email protected] Documentation on the Panel’s work is available at the Bureau d’audiences publiques sur l’environnement and at the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency. Legal Deposit – Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec, 2006 ISBN-13: 978-2-550-48538-4 (print version) Édition originale: ISBN-13: 978-2-550-48327-4 ISBN-10: 2-550-48538-6 (print version) Édition originale: ISBN-10: 2-550-48327-8 ISBN-13: 978-2-550-48539-1 (PDF) ISBN-10: 2-550-48539-4 (PDF) Quebec, November 1st, 2006 Mr. Claude Béchard Minister of Sustainable Development, Environment and Parks Marie-Guyart Building, 30th floor 675, René-Lévesque Boulevard East Quebec, QC G1R 5V7 Dear Minister Béchard: I am pleased to submit to you the report of the Bureau d’audiences publiques sur l’environnement (BAPE) concerning the Cacouna Energy Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) Terminal Project. The commission mandated to hold an inquiry and public hearings, which began on May 8, 2006, was chaired by Mr. Michel Germain, assisted by Mr. John Haemmerli. As a result of its work, the commission considers that the project would satisfy part of the demand for natural gas anticipated in Quebec, Ontario and the north-eastern United States. However, it would only marginally increase the security of Quebec’s supply, primarily in the event of a major break in the pipeline system transporting gas from the west, since the North American natural gas market is integrated. I wish to note that the commission reiterates a position taken by other BAPE commissions, namely, that an essential component like the gas pipeline that will be required to connect the project to the North American natural gas system should be reviewed at the same time as the main project, in this case the LNG terminal. Since participants in the current public review have already raised concerns about the gas pipeline the commission considers that any government authorizations to begin work on the LNG terminal should be conditional on a public environmental review of the gas pipeline project leading to a favourable decision by government. Yours sincerely, William J. Cosgrove President Édifice Lomer-Gouin 575, rue Saint-Amable, bureau 2.10 Québec (Québec) G1R 6A6 Téléphone : 418 643-7447 (sans frais) : 1 800 463-4732 Télécopieur : 418 643-9474 [email protected] www.bape.gouv.qc.ca Quebec, October 30, 2006 Mr. William J. Cosgrove President Bureau d’audiences publiques sur l’environnement Lomer-Gouin Building 575, Saint-Amable Street, Suite 2.10 Quebec, QC G1R 6A6 Dear Mr. President: I am pleased to submit to you the review and public hearing report of the commission mandated to review the Cacouna Energy Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) Terminal Project. Based on its analysis, the commission has concluded that the development of Petro- Canada and TransCanada PipeLines Limited’s project would contribute to maintaining, even slightly increasing, the share of natural gas in the North American market in comparison to other fossil fuels known to emit more greenhouse gases. However, the project has no market outlet since the pipeline needed to connect it to the North American market has not yet been delineated and subject to an environmental assessment. The LNG terminal would be built on federal land that is zoned industrial, but located adjacent to a human environment that is essentially rural and recreational, as well as a natural coastal environment that has high terrestrial and marine biodiversity values. The development of this major industrial facility would confirm the industrial orientation of the Municipality of Cacouna; but could constitute an impediment to local tourism and resort development. The commission, in addition to the proponent and government authorities, has suggested certain mitigation measures. Diligent implementation of these measures, along with appropriate monitoring and follow-up by government agencies, should reduce the significance of environmental effects to an acceptable level. …2 Édifice Lomer-Gouin 575, rue Saint-Amable, bureau 2.10 Québec (Québec) G1R 6A6 Téléphone : 418 643-7447 (sans frais) : 1 800 463-4732 Télécopieur : 418 643-9474 [email protected] www.bape.gouv.qc.ca 2 However, uncertainties remain in relation to the effectiveness of some measures, such as those to attenuate noise or protect birdlife. Careful follow-up therefore appears necessary in order to apply additional measures if necessary. To conclude, allow me to acknowledge the excellent work of the commission team and to express my thanks to them. Michel Germain BAPE Commission Chairman Quebec, November 1st, 2006 The Honourable Rona Ambrose Mr. Claude Béchard Minister of the Environment Minister of Sustainable Development, House of Commons Environment and Parks Ottawa, ON K1A 0A6 Marie-Guyart Building, 30th Floor 675, René-Lévesque Boulevard East Quebec, QC G1R 5V7 Dear Minister Ambrose Dear Minister Béchard: The Joint Review Panel for the Cacouna Energy Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) Terminal Project has completed its review in accordance with the mandate it received on April 7, 2006. As chair of the Joint Review Panel, I am pleased to submit our report to you. Please note that the BAPE commission and the Joint Review Panel agreed to prepare a common report. The Joint Review Panel assessed the project in the context of sustainable development, applying the concept of environment held by the higher courts which includes biophysical, social, economic and cultural aspects. In addition, the Panel ensured the requirements of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act and the Quebec Environment Quality Act were satisfied, as stipulated in the Canada-Quebec Agreement on Environmental Assessment Cooperation. I wish to express my gratitude to my colleagues John Haemmerli and Jean-Thomas Bernard, as well as to the team that assisted the Panel throughout the process. Finally, on behalf of the Joint Review Panel members, I would like to acknowledge the significant contribution of the participants in the public hearings. Yours sincerely, Michel Germain Chair, Joint Review Panel Agence canadienne d’évaluation environnementale Bureau d’audiences publiques sur l’environnement Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency Édifice Lomer-Gouin Place Bell Canada, 22e étage 575, rue Saint-Amable, bureau 2.10 160, rue Elgin Québec (Québec) G1R 6A6 Ottawa (Ontario) K1A 0H3 [email protected] Table of contents Recommendations...................................................................................................................xv Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 1 Chapter 1 Concerns and opinions of participants......................................................... 11 Two development visions................................................................................................... 11 Opponents to the LNG terminal project......................................................................... 11 Project supporters ......................................................................................................... 12 A community divided ..................................................................................................... 13 The environmental assessment process............................................................................ 13 An impact assessment methodology that was criticized ............................................... 13 Exclusion of the gas pipeline and transmission line ...................................................... 14 A generic hearing on LNG terminals ............................................................................. 14 The purpose of the project ................................................................................................. 15 The demand for energy ................................................................................................. 15 A company not yet created............................................................................................ 17 Site selection ................................................................................................................. 17 Local gas delivery.........................................................................................................