Copyright by Julie Alynn George 2005 the Dissertation Committee for Julie Alynn George Certifies That This Is the Approved Version of the Following Dissertation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Copyright by Julie Alynn George 2005 the Dissertation Committee for Julie Alynn George Certifies That This Is the Approved Version of the Following Dissertation Copyright by Julie Alynn George 2005 The Dissertation Committee for Julie Alynn George certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: Separatism or Federalism? Ethnic Conflict and Resolution in Russia and Georgia Committee: Robert G. Moser, Supervisor John Higley Zoltan Barany Harrison Wagner Kenneth Greene Charles King Separatism or Federalism? Ethnic Conflict and Resolution in Russia and Georgia by Julie Alynn George, B.A., M.A. Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Texas at Austin August 2005 Dedication To my father, Paul Richard George, and my mothers, Jean S. George and Patricia Aulbach Acknowledgements I owe many debts to those who offered support and guidance during the dissertation process. I have been lucky to have a superb dissertation advisor and mentor in Rob Moser, who tirelessly offered support and advice throughout my graduate career, in particular its culmination in this project. My dissertation committee has been active throughout the process. Zoltan Barany, Ken Greene, John Higley, Charles King, and Harrison Wagner offered cogent suggestions that bettered the finished project. The deficiencies that remain are the results of my own limitations, and not theirs. I am grateful to the many organizations that funded my dissertation research and writing, and language acquisition. A Fulbright IIE grant funded ten months in Georgia. The Government Department at the University of Texas at Austin sponsored a summer of research in Russia with the MacDonald Summer Internship. My second summer in Russia was financed by the George Mitchell Co-op Research Award and a scholarship offered by the Austin Chapter of the American Association of University Women. My dissertation research and writing also benefited from two academic year fellowships: the William Livingstone University Continuing Fellowship, and the Foreign Language/Area Studies (FLAS) academic year scholarship, administered by the Center for Russian, Eurasian, and East European Studies at UT. The latter scholarship also provided tuition for continued Russian language training. I also benefited from Georgian language training. The Social Science Research Council funded an intensive summer program at Bloomington University, and FLAS provided aid for a similar program at the Center for Kartvelian Studies at Tbilisi State University in Georgia. I appreciate the generosity of all these organizations and institutions, and am humbled by their investments in my work. v In Spring 2003, I participated in two symposia designed to improve graduate student projects. The SSRC Dissertation Workshop for Issues of Governance in Eurasia (2003) and the IREX Policy Symposium on Central Asia and the Caucasus (2003) provided mechanisms for me to meet junior and senior scholars who did similar work, as well as a forum to elicit advice from peers and future colleagues. In particular, I’d like to thank Cynthia Buckley, Peter Colton, Paula Garb, Edward Lazzarini, Gerard Liberadian, Neema Noori, Erik Scott, and Christoph Stefes for their insight. I presented sections of this project in several conferences and received valuable suggestions from Bruno Coppieters, Eka Metreveli, Eric McGlinchey, and Amanda Wooden. Jeremy Teigen read drafts of chapters and offered critical feedback. Throughout my time researching in the field, I enjoyed the hospitality for which Eurasia is famed. Public officials of regional governments in Russia and Georgia generously spent hours of their time discussing their experiences and goals. Within Georgia, central government officials on every level helped me a great deal, as did the members of previous governments. Their openness strengthened this project’s data collection, and I appreciate their willingness to share their views. Many people provided support for my work. In Georgia, Alex Rondeli and Timuri Yakobashvili of the Georgian Foundation for Strategic and International Studies opened their office to me for ten months. In Tbilisi, I am grateful to Ghia Nodia, Shota Utiashvili, Giorgi Tugushi, Giorgi Katcharava, Mark Mullen, Marc Behrendt, John Lewis, and Otar Babunashvili. Natella Akaba helped smooth my way in Abkhazia. Vladimir Gel’man, Dmitry Gorenburg, Leokadiya Drobezheva, and Alexei Titkov helped put me in touch with regional government leaders. In Tatarstan, I am grateful for the help of Gulnaz Sharafutdinova. In Bashkortostan, I am indebted to Ildar Gabdrafikov and Rushan vi Gallyamov. In both countries, I had superb assistants who helped on every level: Salome Tsereteli in Georgia, Rosa Hakim and Alsu Sharipova in Russia. I owe a debt to several professors along the way. Walter Clemens at Boston University gave me this idea and the necessary push. Dodona Kiziria introduced me to the complex but wonderful Georgian language. Elena Mikhailovna Lifshitz has been the best Russian language professor I have ever encountered. Many friends and colleagues gave me moral support and kept me sane during the research and writing process. Johanna Petersson, Tim Blauvelt, Thomas Legge, Merlijn de Smit, Angela Hawken, Elizabeth Eagan, Brooks Ballard, and Giorgi Gogia made my stay in Tbilisi seem way too short. Eka, Devi, Eke, and Levan Metreveli became my Georgian family in Tbilisi. In Russia, the families of Alsu Sharipova and Rosa Hakim welcomed me into their homes and fed me fabulous cuisine. At the University of Texas, I was lucky to find some of the most generous, supportive, and genuinely good people I have ever met in the form of my graduate student colleagues. Many thanks to Neal Allen, Brian Arbour, Dana Baker, Greg Brown, Brian Brox, Darin Foster, Allison Martens, Mark McKenzie, Bobby Parks, Natasha Sugiyama, Mike Unger, Musseref Yetim, and Don Zinman. I appreciate the camaraderie of the Russia crew: Oksan Bayulgen, Jenny Suchland, Chris Speckhard, Frank Thames, Patricia Ryan, and Mike Dennis. My greatest debt is to my family, which has been so supportive during this process. I met my husband, Jeremy Teigen, in graduate school in Austin, and he visited me during my months in Tbilisi, and accompanied me to Russia. He read my dissertation chapters even as he wrote his own. Throughout my academic career, my parents offered support, insight, and interest in my work. My father has been my advocate in everything I do. My mothers, both of whom earned doctorates, have been my role models throughout the past decades. vii Separatism or Federalism? Ethnic Conflict and Resolution in Russia and Georgia Publication No._____________ Julie Alynn George, Ph.D. The University of Texas at Austin, 2005 Supervisor: Robert G. Moser Ethnic conflicts have accounted for most of the world’s wars in recent decades. My dissertation, based on research on ethno-federal regions in Russia and Georgia, analyzes the factors that cause some ethnic mobilization movements to become violent while others find negotiated settlements or never become politically conflictual. Contrary to recent ethnicity literature, which emphasizes the role of ethnic group wealth, intergroup political dynamics, and historical oppression, my findings indicate that although such factors are important, central-regional elite networks and state capacity are the crucial factors that affect violent or non-violent regional strategies. Elite networks open pathways for negotiation and patronage politics. Failed states enhance the likelihood for conflict: they not only provide incentives for ethnic mobilization by enterprising regional ethnic elites, but are often unable to offer credible negotiation deals to regional groups. viii Table of Contents List of Tables ......................................................................................................... xi List of Figures....................................................................................................... xii Introduction..............................................................................................................1 Outline of the project ......................................................................................5 Chapter 1................................................................................................................10 Ethnic Separatism: Assessing Major Theories in the Former Soviet Union 11 Chapter 2: An Explanation of Ethnic Separatism..................................................39 Introduction...................................................................................................39 Theoretical Framework.................................................................................40 Methods: Case selection, data collection, and measurement........................61 Conclusion ....................................................................................................68 Chapter 3: National Territorialization in the Soviet Union ...................................69 National territories and the Successor States................................................97 Conclusion: The Power and Limits of the Institutional Explanation............99 Chapter 4: Violent Secession from Russia and Georgia......................................101 Betraying Patrons and Punishing Upstarts: The Chechen Wars.................103 Georgia: South Ossetia and Abkhazia ........................................................132 South Ossetia: Autonomy denied, independence seized.............................132
Recommended publications
  • The Role of the United Nations in the Georgian-Abkhazian Conflict
    The Role of the United Nations in the Georgian-Abkhazian Conflict SUSAN STEWART The Mannheim Centre for European Social Research, University of Mannheim, Germany Issue 2/2003 EUROPEAN CENTRE FOR MINORITY ISSUES (ECMI) Schiffbrücke 12 (Kompagnietor Building) D-24939 Flensburg Germany ( +49-(0)461-14 14 9-0 fax +49-(0)461-14 14 9-19 e-mail: [email protected] internet: http://www.ecmi.de The Role of the United Nations in the Georgian-Abkhazian Conflict* SUSAN STEWART The Mannheim Centre for European Social Research, University of Mannheim, Germany This article analyses UNOMIG efforts at stabilization and mediation in the Georgian-Abkhazian conflict, arguing that while progress in both realms has been slight, there is reason to conclude that stabilization attempts have been more successful than those of mediation. The author contends that difficulties in the mediation sphere can largely be attributed to UN insistence on Georgian territorial integrity and on a comprehensive settlement including continued substantial progress on the question of Abkhazia’s political status. While coordination between the CIS peacekeepers and the UN has proceeded smoothly, the multidimensional involvement of the Russian Federation has complicated the constellation of actors surrounding the conflict. Owing to these external as well as other internal factors, the author concludes that the outlook for Georgian-Abkhazian negotiations in the short to medium term appears bleak, but that the conclusions drawn from the role of the UN in the Georgian-Abkhazian conflict can be useful for understanding difficulties the UN is likely to encounter in similar interventions. I. Introduction The recent war in Iraq has again called into question the potential role of the United Nations in world affairs.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Rights and Democratization in the Republic of Georgia
    HUMAN RIGHTS AND DEMOCRATIZATION IN THE REPUBLIC OF GEORGIA HEARING BEFORE THE COMMISSION ON SECURITY AND COOPERATION IN EUROPE ONE HUNDRED FOURTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION MARCH 28, 1995 Printed for the use of the Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe [CSCE 104-1-3] Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.csce.gov HUMAN RIGHTS AND DEMOCRATIZATION IN THE REPUBLIC OF GEORGIA TUESDAY, MARCH 28, 1995 COMMISSION ON SECURITY AND COOPERATION IN EUROPE, WASHINGTON, DC. The Commission met, pursuant to notice, at 2:10 p.m., in room 106, Dirksen Senate Office Building, Washington, DC., Hon. Christopher Smith, Chairman, presiding. Commissioners Present: Hon. Christopher Smith, Chairman; Hon. Alfonse D'Amato, Co-chairman; and Hon. Frank R. Wolf, Commissioner. Witnesses: Hon. Tedo Japaridze, Dr. Eduard Gudava, Ms. Erika Dailey, and Dr. Stephen F. Jones. OPENING STATEMENT OF CHAIRMAN SMITH Chairman Smith. I want to thank all of you for coming to this hear- ing, which to my knowledge is the first hearing in the history of the U.S. Congress focused exclusively on Georgia. This is the latest in a series of Helsinki Commission hearings that examine the state of de- mocratization and human rights in individual countries and regions of the former Soviet Union. In the late 1980's, Georgians began to organize politically to undo communism and to gain independence. They lived through a very excit- ing period, although a key element in the chronicle of the liberation movement was tragic, the April 1989 killings of peaceful protesters in Tbilisi by Soviet forces. Since then, however, Georgia has endured very difficult times.
    [Show full text]
  • Georgia/Abkhazia
    HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH ARMS PROJECT HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH/HELSINKI March 1995 Vol. 7, No. 7 GEORGIA/ABKHAZIA: VIOLATIONS OF THE LAWS OF WAR AND RUSSIA'S ROLE IN THE CONFLICT CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY, RECOMMENDATIONS............................................................................................................5 EVOLUTION OF THE WAR.......................................................................................................................................6 The Role of the Russian Federation in the Conflict.........................................................................................7 RECOMMENDATIONS...............................................................................................................................................8 To the Government of the Republic of Georgia ..............................................................................................8 To the Commanders of the Abkhaz Forces .....................................................................................................8 To the Government of the Russian Federation................................................................................................8 To the Confederation of Mountain Peoples of the Caucasus...........................................................................9 To the United Nations .....................................................................................................................................9 To the Organization on Security and Cooperation in Europe..........................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Museums Visit More Than 80 Million Visitors, 1/3 of Who Are Visitors Under 18
    Moscow 4 There are more than 3000 museums (and about 72 000 museum workers) in Russian Moscow region 92 Federation, not including school and company museums. Every year Russian museums visit more than 80 million visitors, 1/3 of who are visitors under 18 There are about 650 individual and institutional members in ICOM Russia. During two last St. Petersburg 117 years ICOM Russia membership was rapidly increasing more than 20% (or about 100 new members) a year Northwestern region 160 You will find the information aboutICOM Russia members in this book. All members (individual and institutional) are divided in two big groups – Museums which are institutional members of ICOM or are represented by individual members and Organizations. All the museums in this book are distributed by regional principle. Organizations are structured in profile groups Central region 192 Volga river region 224 Many thanks to all the museums who offered their help and assistance in the making of this collection South of Russia 258 Special thanks to Urals 270 Museum creation and consulting Culture heritage security in Russia with 3M(tm)Novec(tm)1230 Siberia and Far East 284 © ICOM Russia, 2012 Organizations 322 © K. Novokhatko, A. Gnedovsky, N. Kazantseva, O. Guzewska – compiling, translation, editing, 2012 [email protected] www.icom.org.ru © Leo Tolstoy museum-estate “Yasnaya Polyana”, design, 2012 Moscow MOSCOW A. N. SCRiAbiN MEMORiAl Capital of Russia. Major political, economic, cultural, scientific, religious, financial, educational, and transportation center of Russia and the continent MUSEUM Highlights: First reference to Moscow dates from 1147 when Moscow was already a pretty big town.
    [Show full text]
  • Strong Men, Weak State: Power Ministry Officials and the Federal
    Strong Men, Weak State Power Ministry Officials and the Federal Districts PONARS Policy Memo 284 Brian D. Taylor University of Oklahoma October 2002 Vladimir Putin's KGB past, strong state rhetoric, and specific policy decisions (Chechnya, the attacks on media oligarchs Boris Berezovskii and Vladimir Gusinskii, etc.) have heightened fears of the return to a police state in Russia. The creation of seven federal districts in May 2000, five of which were headed by police and military generals, seemed to provide further evidence of this authoritarian drift. Two and one half years later, we can now draw some conclusions about the extent to which Putin's federal reforms are based on the use of military and police power. Although some of the nightmare scenarios have not materialized, the degree to which power ministry officials dominate federal district structures is striking. Paradoxically, however, the presence of so many officers in these positions will ultimately weaken, rather than strengthen, Putin's efforts to build a strong state. In the twenty-first century, effective state administration relies as much on horizontal ties as on vertical ones. As a general rule, Russian officers lack the political skills and training required to create these ties. Russia's strong men are likely to create a weak state. Coloring the Regions Khaki "Power ministries" or "power structures" (silovie strukturi, or siloviki for personnel from these structures) are the catchall terms used to describe Russian government bodies whose personnel carry weapons or wear uniforms. There are more than a dozen such agencies in Russia. The three most important are generally considered to be the Armed Forces, the Ministry of Internal Affairs (MVD), and the Federal Security Service (FSB).
    [Show full text]
  • Georgian Country and Culture Guide
    Georgian Country and Culture Guide მშვიდობის კორპუსი საქართველოში Peace Corps Georgia 2017 Forward What you have in your hands right now is the collaborate effort of numerous Peace Corps Volunteers and staff, who researched, wrote and edited the entire book. The process began in the fall of 2011, when the Language and Cross-Culture component of Peace Corps Georgia launched a Georgian Country and Culture Guide project and PCVs from different regions volunteered to do research and gather information on their specific areas. After the initial information was gathered, the arduous process of merging the researched information began. Extensive editing followed and this is the end result. The book is accompanied by a CD with Georgian music and dance audio and video files. We hope that this book is both informative and useful for you during your service. Sincerely, The Culture Book Team Initial Researchers/Writers Culture Sara Bushman (Director Programming and Training, PC Staff, 2010-11) History Jack Brands (G11), Samantha Oliver (G10) Adjara Jen Geerlings (G10), Emily New (G10) Guria Michelle Anderl (G11), Goodloe Harman (G11), Conor Hartnett (G11), Kaitlin Schaefer (G10) Imereti Caitlin Lowery (G11) Kakheti Jack Brands (G11), Jana Price (G11), Danielle Roe (G10) Kvemo Kartli Anastasia Skoybedo (G11), Chase Johnson (G11) Samstkhe-Javakheti Sam Harris (G10) Tbilisi Keti Chikovani (Language and Cross-Culture Coordinator, PC Staff) Workplace Culture Kimberly Tramel (G11), Shannon Knudsen (G11), Tami Timmer (G11), Connie Ross (G11) Compilers/Final Editors Jack Brands (G11) Caitlin Lowery (G11) Conor Hartnett (G11) Emily New (G10) Keti Chikovani (Language and Cross-Culture Coordinator, PC Staff) Compilers of Audio and Video Files Keti Chikovani (Language and Cross-Culture Coordinator, PC Staff) Irakli Elizbarashvili (IT Specialist, PC Staff) Revised and updated by Tea Sakvarelidze (Language and Cross-Culture Coordinator) and Kakha Gordadze (Training Manager).
    [Show full text]
  • Film Education (Levan Koghuashvili, Maia Gugunava, Tato Kotetishvili) 139 1001 Ingredients for Making Films from Nana Jorjadze 146
    ~ editors letter ~ The year of 2015 started with our becoming members of the Creative Europe, while by the end of the year, with the purpose of supporting the cinema industry, Geor- gian government introduced a cash rebate system, we have been working on since 2009. I believe both of these initiatives will make a huge contribution to the develop- ment of our industry. 1 In 2016, movies of different genres will be released. It is notable that three feature films among those are directed by women. Projects we are currently working on are very important. We have announced new types of competitions on script development, including comedy and children’s movies, adaptation of Georgian prose of the 21st century, scripts dedicated to the 100th anniver- sary of Georgia’s independence, and animation. Winners are given long- term work- shops by European script doctors, so 2016 will be dedicated to the script development. The young generation has become active in the field: we had premieres of six short films and a short film by Data Pirtskhalava “Father” was the winner of the main prize in this category at Locarno International Film Festival. Other films – “Ogasavara”, “Fa- ther”, “Exit”, “Preparation”, “The First Day” – are also participating at different festivals. Masters of Georgian cinema are also making films side-by-side with the young genera- tion. I have to mention a film by Rezo Esadze “Day as a Month” with its extraordinary nar- rative structure and visualaspect, which will take its noteworthy place in our film collection. One of the most important goals this year will be to return Georgian cinema heritage from archives in Moscow and design a suitable storage facility for it.
    [Show full text]
  • 15 Transformation of the System of Bilingual Education in The
    Journal of Social Studies Education Research Sosyal Bilgiler Eğitimi Araştırmaları Dergisi 2017:8 (2),15-38 www.jsser.org Transformation of the System of Bilingual Education in the Republic of Tatarstan: Crossover Ethnolinguistic Controversies Olga Maximova1, Vladimir Belyaev2, Olga Laukart-Gorbacheva3 Abstract The relevance of the problem range addressed in the study is conditioned by the system of education functioning under multiculturalism in modern polyethnic societies and their social stability much depending on the balanced use of languages of ethnoses that reside in the region as well as on the respectful attitude to their representatives in daily life. Thus, the system of education has to take into account the ethnic and religious, political, social and cultural requirements of the society offering high- quality education to the consumers according to their expectations. The objective of the paper consists in revealing the topical problems of regional educational reforms aimed at implementing the principle of bilingualism in polyethnic and polyreligious region of Russia – the Republic of Tatarstan. The representative mass survey of population of the Republic of Tatarstan and a series of in-depth narrative interviews with representatives of various generations of Tatarstan citizens as the main methods used in the research. Based on the sociological survey conducted within the research project "Dynamics of real and conventional generations in information polyethnic and polyreligious society (a case study of the Republic of Tatarstan)", the following findings have been made. Scientific justification of the language policy being implemented in the republic and of the methodological support of bilingual educational programs are of poor level. A higher education system segregated according to the information carrier language prevails.
    [Show full text]
  • Forimmediate Release
    FFOROR IIMMEDIATMMEDIATE RRELEASEELEASE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY ART MUSEUM AND PACIFIC FILM ARCHIVE Media Contact: Karen Larsen [email protected] (415) 957-1205 Discovering Georgian Cinema A COPRESENTATION WITH THE MUSEUM OF MODERN ART BAM/PFA AND MOMA COLLABORATE ON THE LARGEST RETROSPECTIVE OF GEORGIAN CINEMA EVER IN THE US; SERIES FEATURES APPROXIMATELY FIFTY FILMS AND SPANS MORE THAN A CENTURY OF FILMMAKING; BERKELEY PRESENTATION OPENS IN LATE SEPTEMBER AND CONTINUES THROUGH SPRING 2015 August 25, 2014, Berkeley, CA – The University of California, Berkeley Art Museum and Pacific Film Archive (BAM/PFA) and The Museum of Modern Art (MoMA) are proud to present Discovering Georgian Cinema, the largest retrospective of Georgian film ever mounted in North America. A collaboration between BAM/PFA and MoMA, the series spans more than a Giorgi Shengelaia’s Pirosmani (1969) century of filmmaking, from 1907 through 2014. The retrospective demonstrates a dazzling range of stylistic approaches and thematic concerns, from antibureaucratic satires of the Soviet system to philosophical studies rooted in a humanist tradition and lyrical depictions of Georgia’s spectacular landscape. BAM/PFA and MoMA will run concurrent programs this fall. The exhibition is organized by BAM/PFA Senior Film Curator Susan Oxtoby and Jytte Jensen, Curator, Department of Film, MoMA. Mailing Address: 2625 Durant Avenue #2250 Berkeley, California 94720-2250 bampfa.berkeley.edu The BAM/PFA presentation gets underway on September 26 and continues through spring 2015. Including approximately fifty programs, the series showcases the strength of BAM/PFA’s own Soviet Georgian collection, as well as rare prints from international archives. Screenings at the PFA Theater will feature special guests, including filmmakers and authorities on Georgian cinema and culture.
    [Show full text]
  • Representation of Political Forces in the Legislative Body of Georgia in the Period Between 1990 and 2016
    Representation of Political Forces in the Legislative Body of Georgia in the period between 1990 and 2016 Since 1990, parliamentary elections have taken place nine times in Georgia. The ones held in 2016 resulted in election of the Parliament of the 9th convocation by ​ the population of Georgia. 2016 parliamentary elections brought along concerns whether concentration of the constitutional majority in a single party in the legislative body is well justified or vice versa, whether diversity of political parties can lead to positive outcomes for the country. According to the Election Code of Georgia, a subject which represents a registered party, an election bloc, an initiative group of voters or independent candidate to majoritarian membership is entitled to run for elections. Transparency International – Georgia explored representation of political forces in the legislative body of Georgia in the period between 1990 and 2016 as well as number of elected members and election threshold stipulated by the law. ● The 2nd convocation of Parliament (1992-1995), with 24 parties overcoming ​ the election threshold, was the one with the greatest number of political ​ subjects. ​ ● In terms of the number of MPs, the Supreme Council with 247 members was the most numerous. ​ ● 2% represented the lowest election threshold, whereas 7% - the highest. ​ ​ ● The parliament of the 8th convocation (2012-2016) included just two ​ ​ election subjects, though the bloc “Georgian Dream” was comprised of six parties. th ● Since 1990, including the parliament of the 8 c​ onvocation, the legislative ​ body has had 1216 members ​ ● The following members were most frequently represented in different convocations of the Parliament: Akaki Bobokhidze (member of six convocations) and Giorgi Baramidze (member of five convocations) Number of MPs in the legislative body and the election threshold Number of elected MPs as well as the election threshold have experienced a number of changes over time along with amendments to the law.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Individuals Recognised As Political Prisoners by MEMORIAL
    List of Individuals Recognised as Political Prisoners by MEMORIAL Human Rights Centre and Persecuted in connection with the Realisation of Their Right to Freedom of Religion 30 october 2020 We consider political prisoners to be individuals who are serving a prison sentence, as well as those being held in custody or under house arrest as a form of pre-trial detention. We reckon among political prisoners individuals who are being persecuted in connection with the realisation of their legitimate rights as well as those who are being unlawfully or disproportionately persecuted by the authorities for political reasons. We do not regard as political prisoners those individuals who used violence against the person or called for violence on the grounds of religion, nationality, race etc. All the criteria for considering individuals as political prisoners are published on our website. As individuals persecuted in connection with the realisation of the right to freedom of religion make up more than a half of the total number of political prisoners in Russia, and as their cases of persecution have much in common, their names are compiled in a separate list. None of the individuals on the list used violence, called for violence or planned violent acts. There are 297 names in the present list. Now, it contains almost exclusively the names of Muslims, a majority of whom have been accused of participating in the organisation of Hizb ut-Tahrir al-Islami, as well as followers of Turkish theologian Bediüzzaman Said Nursî, who have been accused of participating in the inexistent organisation of Nurdjular. Jehovah’s Witnesses have become another target of persecutions for religious reasons after their organisations were groundlessly labelled extremist and banned in Russia in 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • The Russian Federation
    The Russian Federation Marat Salikov Geographically, Russia is the world's largest country, with a land area of 17,075,200 square kilometres. It dominates northern Eurasia, stretching northward to the Arctic Ocean, eastward to the Pacific Ocean, and westward to Central Europe, and it is bordered by (among other countries) Azerbaijan, Belarus, China, Poland, and the Ukraine. Russia’s population numbers about 145 million. Russians comprise the most numerous ethnic group (81.5 percent of the population), and Russian is the predominant language. However, Russia includes a variety of other ethnic groups, including Tatars (3.8 percent of the population), Ukrainians (3.0 percent), Chuvash (1.2 percent), and Bashkirs (0.9 percent). These groups tend to be geographically concentrated, and some groups retain their own language. The main religion is Russian Orthodox, although there is a substantial Muslim population and some representation of other religions. As of 2000 the per capita income was US$4,200. Russia has not only the world's largest national land area, but also one of its most complex federal systems. The Russian Federation combines both ethno-federalism and territorial federalism. Its 89 constituent units, typically referred to as "subjects of the federation," are divided into six different types -- republics, autonomous areas, one autonomous region, territories, regions, and federal cities -- although the asymmetrical features of this division have been muted since the adoption of the 1993 federation Constitution. This Constitution also gives federal constitutional status to local governments. In addition, it authorizes the president of the federation to enter into treaties with the executives of constituent units, further particularizing the allocation of power between the national government and the various subjects of the federation.
    [Show full text]