DOCSLIB.ORG

Result of Roll-Call Votes of 2 April 2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Result of Roll-Call Votes of 2 April 2019 COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT RESULT OF ROLL-CALL VOTES OF 2 APRIL 2019 Table of Contents 1. Establishing rules on support for strategic plans to be drawn up by Member States under the Common agricultural policy (CAP Strategic Plans) and financed by the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) ................................................................................4 1.1. Final vote ..................................................................................................................4 2. Amendment 449 (CAP Strategic Plans) ...................................................................5 3. Compromise amendment 1 (CAP Strategic Plans) .................................................6 4. Compromise amendment 2 (CAP Strategic Plans) .................................................7 5. Compromise amendment 3 (CAP Strategic Plans) .................................................8 6. Compromise amendment 4 (CAP Strategic Plans) .................................................9 7. Compromise amendments 5 and 6 (CAP Strategic Plans) ...................................10 8. Compromise amendment 7 (CAP Strategic Plans) ...............................................11 9. Compromise amendment 8 (CAP Strategic Plans) ...............................................12 10. Compromise amendment 9 (CAP Strategic Plans) ...........................................13 11. Compromise amendment 10 (CAP Strategic Plans) .........................................14 12. Compromise amendment 11 (CAP Strategic Plans) .........................................15 13. Compromise amendment 12 (CAP Strategic Plans) .........................................16 14. Compromise amendment 13 (CAP Strategic Plans) .........................................17 15. Amendment 1800 (CAP Strategic Plans)............................................................18 16. Compromise amendment 15 (CAP Strategic Plans) .........................................19 17. Compromise amendment 18 (CAP Strategic Plans) .........................................20 18. Compromise amendment 19 (CAP Strategic Plans) .........................................21 19. Alternative compromise amendment 3 (CAP Strategic Plans) ........................22 20. Compromise amendments 22 and 23 (CAP Strategic Plans) ...........................23 21. Compromise amendment 25 (CAP Strategic Plans) .........................................24 22. Compromise amendment 26 (CAP Strategic Plans) .........................................25 23. Compromise amendment 28 (CAP Strategic Plans) .........................................26 24. Compromise amendment 29-31 (CAP Strategic Plans) ....................................27 25. Compromise amendment 39 (CAP Strategic Plans) .........................................28 26. Compromise amendment 40 (CAP Strategic Plans) .........................................29 27. Compromise amendment 41 (CAP Strategic Plans) .........................................30 28. Compromise amendment 42 (CAP Strategic Plans) .........................................31 1 29. Compromise amendment 43 (CAP Strategic Plans) .........................................32 30. Compromise amendment 44 (CAP Strategic Plans) .........................................33 31. Compromise amendment 46 (CAP Strategic Plans) .........................................34 32. Compromise amendments 48-50 (CAP Strategic Plans)...................................35 33. Compromise amendment 51 (CAP Strategic Plans) .........................................36 34. Compromise amendment 52 (CAP Strategic Plans) .........................................37 35. Compromise amendment 53 (CAP Strategic Plans) .........................................38 36. Compromise amendments 59-63 (CAP Strategic Plans)...................................39 37. Compromise amendment 64 (CAP Strategic Plans) .........................................40 38. Compromise amendment 65 (CAP Strategic Plans) .........................................41 39. Compromise amendment 66 (CAP Strategic Plans) .........................................42 40. Compromise amendment 67 (CAP Strategic Plans) .........................................43 41. Compromise amendment 68 (CAP Strategic Plans) .........................................44 42. Compromise amendment 68a (CAP Strategic Plans) .......................................46 43. Compromise amendment 68b (CAP Strategic Plans) .......................................46 44. Compromise amendment 69 (CAP Strategic Plans) .........................................47 45. Compromise amendment 70 (CAP Strategic Plans) .........................................48 46. Compromise amendment 71 (CAP Strategic Plans) .........................................49 47. Compromise amendment 72 (CAP Strategic Plans) .........................................50 48. Compromise amendment 72a (CAP Strategic Plans) .......................................51 49. Compromise amendments 73-78 (CAP Strategic Plans)...................................52 50. Alternative compromise amendment 7 (CAP Strategic Plans) ........................53 51. Compromise amendment 79 (CAP Strategic Plans) .........................................55 52. Compromise amendment 80 (CAP Strategic Plans) .........................................56 53. Compromise amendment 81 (CAP Strategic Plans) .........................................57 54. Compromise amendment 82 (CAP Strategic Plans) .........................................58 55. Compromise amendment 83 (CAP Strategic Plans) .........................................59 56. Compromise amendment 85 (CAP Strategic Plans) .........................................59 57. Compromise amendment 86 (CAP Strategic Plans) .........................................60 58. Amendment 4142 (CAP Strategic Plans)............................................................62 59. Alternative compromise amendment 9 (CAP Strategic Plans) ........................62 60. Compromise amendment 87 (CAP Strategic Plans) .........................................63 61. Compromise amendment 88 (CAP Strategic Plans) .........................................64 62. Compromise amendment 89 (CAP Strategic Plans) .........................................65 63. Compromise amendment 90 (CAP Strategic Plans) .........................................66 64. Compromise amendment 91 (CAP Strategic Plans) .........................................67 65. Compromise amendment 92 (CAP Strategic Plans) .........................................68 66. Compromise amendment 93 (CAP Strategic Plans) .........................................69 67. Compromise amendment 94 (CAP Strategic Plans) .........................................70 68. Compromise amendment 95 (CAP Strategic Plans) .........................................71 69. Compromise amendment 96 (CAP Strategic Plans) .........................................72 70. Compromise amendment 97 (CAP Strategic Plans) .........................................73 71. Compromise amendment 98 (CAP Strategic Plans) .........................................74 72. Compromise amendment 99 (CAP Strategic Plans) .........................................75 73. Compromise amendment 100 (CAP Strategic Plans) .......................................76 74. Compromise amendment 102 (CAP Strategic Plans) .......................................77 2 75. Compromise amendment 103 (CAP Strategic Plans) .......................................78 76. Compromise amendment 104 (CAP Strategic Plans) .......................................79 77. Compromise amendment 106 (CAP Strategic Plans) .......................................80 78. Compromise amendment 107 (CAP Strategic Plans) .......................................81 79. Compromise amendment 108 (CAP Strategic Plans) .......................................82 80. Compromise amendment 109 (CAP Strategic Plans) .......................................83 81. Compromise amendment 110 (CAP Strategic Plans) .......................................84 82. Compromise amendment 110a (CAP Strategic Plans) .....................................85 83. Compromise amendment 111 (CAP Strategic Plans) .......................................86 84. Compromise amendment 112 (CAP Strategic Plans) .......................................87 85. Compromise amendment 113 (CAP Strategic Plans) .......................................89 86. Compromise amendment 114 (CAP Strategic Plans) .......................................90 87. Compromise amendment 115 (CAP Strategic Plans) .......................................90 88. Compromise amendment 116 (CAP Strategic Plans) .......................................91 89. Compromise amendment 118 (CAP Strategic Plans) .......................................92 90. Compromise amendment 119 (CAP Strategic Plans) .......................................93 91. Compromise amendment 120 (CAP Strategic Plans) .......................................94 92. Compromise amendment 121 (CAP Strategic Plans) .......................................95 93. Compromise amendment 122 (CAP Strategic Plans) .......................................96 94. Compromise amendment 123 (CAP Strategic Plans) .......................................98 95. Compromise amendment 124 (CAP Strategic Plans) .......................................99 96. Compromise amendment 125 (CAP Strategic Plans) .....................................100 97. Compromise amendment 126 (CAP Strategic Plans) .....................................101
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Green Deal – the Coordinators
    Green Deal – The Coordinators David Sassoli S&D ”I want the European Green Deal to become Europe’s hallmark. At the heart of it is our commitment to becoming the world’s first climate-neutral continent. It is also a long-term economic imperative: those who act first European Parliament and fastest will be the ones who grasp the opportunities from the ecological transition. I want Europe to be 1 February 2020 – H1 2024 the front-runner. I want Europe to be the exporter of knowledge, technologies and best practice.” — Ursula von der Leyen Lorenzo Mannelli Klaus Welle President of the European Commission Head of Cabinet Secretary General Chairs and Vice-Chairs Political Group Coordinators EPP S&D EPP S&D Renew ID Europe ENVI Renew Committee on Europe Dan-Ştefan Motreanu César Luena Peter Liese Jytte Guteland Nils Torvalds Silvia Sardone Vice-Chair Vice-Chair Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator the Environment, Public Health Greens/EFA GUE/NGL Greens/EFA ECR GUE/NGL and Food Safety Pacal Canfin Chair Bas Eickhout Anja Hazekamp Bas Eickhout Alexandr Vondra Silvia Modig Vice-Chair Vice-Chair Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator S&D S&D EPP S&D Renew ID Europe EPP ITRE Patrizia Toia Lina Gálvez Muñoz Christian Ehler Dan Nica Martina Dlabajová Paolo Borchia Committee on Vice-Chair Vice-Chair Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator Industry, Research Renew ECR Greens/EFA ECR GUE/NGL and Energy Cristian Bușoi Europe Chair Morten Petersen Zdzisław Krasnodębski Ville Niinistö Zdzisław Krasnodębski Marisa Matias Vice-Chair Vice-Chair
    [Show full text]
  • Power Ranking of Meps in the Agricultural Committee of the European Parliament
    Who has the critical vote? Power ranking of MEPs in the Agricultural Committee of the European Parliament A. Kovacs¹; I. Fertő²; L. Kóczy²; B. Sziklai²; A.A. Nás² 1: Tec de Monterrey, Department of International Business, Mexico, 2: Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Economics, Hungary Corresponding author email: [email protected] Abstract: We analyze the voting power of the members of the agricultural committee of the European Parliament using a spatial Banzhaf power index. Using a novel dataset of roll-call votes in the current EP-term, we identify critical members whose votes are necessary to form winning coalitions. We found that committee members with formal positions, EP group coordinators as well as German, French, Italian and British members are powerful actors. Nevertheless, rapporteurs are not necessarily influential. We also concluded that members with moderate ideological position but from Member States with extreme agricultural importance are the most powerful ones. Acknowledegment: JEL Codes: C71, A12 #1419 Who has the critical vote? Power ranking of MEPs in the Agricultural Committee of the European Parliament Abstract We analyze the voting power of the members of the agricultural committee of the European Parliament using a spatial Banzhaf power index. Using a novel dataset of roll-call votes in the current EP-term, we identify critical members whose votes are necessary to form winning coalitions. We found that committee members with formal positions, EP group coordinators as well as German, French, Italian and British members are powerful actors. Nevertheless, rapporteurs are not necessarily influential. We also concluded that members with moderate ideological position but from Member States with extreme agricultural importance are the most powerful ones.
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast
    Briefing May 2019 European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast Austria – 18 MEPs Staff lead: Nick Dornheim PARTIES (EP group) Freedom Party of Austria The Greens – The Green Austrian People’s Party (ÖVP) (EPP) Social Democratic Party of Austria NEOS – The New (FPÖ) (Salvini’s Alliance) – Alternative (Greens/EFA) – 6 seats (SPÖ) (S&D) - 5 seats Austria (ALDE) 1 seat 5 seats 1 seat 1. Othmar Karas* Andreas Schieder Harald Vilimsky* Werner Kogler Claudia Gamon 2. Karoline Edtstadler Evelyn Regner* Georg Mayer* Sarah Wiener Karin Feldinger 3. Angelika Winzig Günther Sidl Petra Steger Monika Vana* Stefan Windberger 4. Simone Schmiedtbauer Bettina Vollath Roman Haider Thomas Waitz* Stefan Zotti 5. Lukas Mandl* Hannes Heide Vesna Schuster Olga Voglauer Nini Tsiklauri 6. Wolfram Pirchner Julia Elisabeth Herr Elisabeth Dieringer-Granza Thomas Schobesberger Johannes Margreiter 7. Christian Sagartz Christian Alexander Dax Josef Graf Teresa Reiter 8. Barbara Thaler Stefanie Mösl Maximilian Kurz Isak Schneider 9. Christian Zoll Luca Peter Marco Kaiser Andrea Kerbleder Peter Berry 10. Claudia Wolf-Schöffmann Theresa Muigg Karin Berger Julia Reichenhauser NB 1: Only the parties reaching the 4% electoral threshold are mentioned in the table. Likely to be elected Unlikely to be elected or *: Incumbent Member of the NB 2: 18 seats are allocated to Austria, same as in the previous election. and/or take seat to take seat, if elected European Parliament ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• www.eurocommerce.eu Belgium – 21 MEPs Staff lead: Stefania Moise PARTIES (EP group) DUTCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY FRENCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY GERMAN SPEAKING CONSTITUENCY 1. Geert Bourgeois 1. Paul Magnette 1. Pascal Arimont* 2. Assita Kanko 2. Maria Arena* 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Results of the FINAL Votes
    24 February 2021 at 17:24 Results of the FINAL VOTEs 24 February AGRI Voting session Concerned AM Tabled by Remarks Rapp Vote text 2019 COM discharge - AGRi opinion (Milazzo) Final vote – Draft as amended (Roll-call vote) + 33/8/4 Opinion - European leadership in the digital age and an EU approach to artificial intelligence (Ivo Hristov) Final vote – Draft as amended (Roll-call vote) + 40/5/0 Early non objection to DA on F&V Wine temporary exceptional measures Covid-19 (Norbert Lins) Single vote – (Roll-call vote) + 40/5/0 Early non objection on DA on the financial contribution in the apiculture sector (Norbert Lins) Single vote – (Roll-call vote) + 45/0/0 RESULTS BY ROLL-CALL Roll-call: 2019 COM discharge - AGRi opinion – Final vote 33 + ECR Mazaly Aguilar, Krzysztof Jurgiel, Bert-Jan Ruissen, Veronika Vrecionová ID Mara Bizzotto, Angelo Ciocca PPE Daniel Buda, Salvatore De Meo, Herbert Dorfmann, Jarosław Kalinowski, Norbert Lins, Colm Markey, Anne Sander, Petri Sarvamaa, Simone Schmiedtbauer, Annie Schreijer-Pierik, Juan Ignacio Zoido Álvarez Renew Atidzhe Alieva-Veli, Martin Hlaváček, Alin Mituța S&D Clara Aguilera, Eric Andrieu, Attila Ara-Kovács, Carmen Avram, Adrian- Dragoş Benea, Isabel Carvalhais, Paolo De Castro, Maria Noichl, Juozas Olekas, Pina Picierno The Left Luke Ming Flanagan, Petros Kokkalis, Chris MacManus 8 - ID Ivan David, Gilles Lebreton, Maxette Pirbakas Verts/ALE Benoît Biteau, Martin Häusling, Pär Holmgren, Bronis Ropė, Sarah Wiener 4 0 NI Dino Giarrusso Renew Asger Christensen, Elsi Katainen, Ulrike Müller Roll-call:
    [Show full text]
  • Európai Parlament 2014-2019
    Európai Parlament 2014-2019 Állampolgári Jogi, Bel- és Igazságügyi Bizottság, Nőjogi és Esélyegyenlőségi Bizottság CJ01_PV(2017)0711_1 JEGYZŐKÖNYV a 2017. július 11-én, 18.10–18.30 között tartott ülésről BRÜSSZEL Az ülést 2017. július 11-én, kedden, 18.22-kor Claude Moraes (elnök) elnökletével nyitják meg. 1. A napirend elfogadása CJ01_OJ (2017)0711_1 A napirendet elfogadják. *** Elektronikus szavazás *** 3. Közös bizottsági ülés (55. cikk) Az Európai Uniónak az Európa Tanács nőkkel szembeni erőszak és a kapcsolati erőszak elleni küzdelemről és azok megelőzéséről szóló Egyezményéhez történő csatlakozása CJ01/8/06786 *** 2016/0062(NLE) COM(2016)0109 Előadók Christine Revault D'Allonnes Bonnefoy (S&D) PR – PE601.176v01-00 Anna Maria Corazza Bildt (PPE) AM – PE603.111v02-00 Illetékes: LIBE, FEMM Vélemények: JURI – Jiří Maštálka (GUE/NGL) AD – PE601.097v02-00 AM – PE602.913v01-00 Jelentéstervezet elfogadása Az elnök bevezető megjegyzéseket tesz. A jelentéstervezetet 58 igen szavazattal, 12 ellenében, 4 tartózkodás mellett elfogadják. PV\1132540HU.docx PE609.498v01-00 HU Egyesülve a sokféleségben HU A következő módosításokat elfogadják: COMP 1, COMP 2, COMP 2A, COMP 3, COMP 4, COMP 5, COMP 6, COMP 7, COMP 8, COMP 9, COMP 10, COMP 11, COMP 12, COMP 13, COMP 14, COMP 15, COMP 16, COMP 1 (preambulumbekezdések), COMP 2 (preambulumbekezdések), COMP 3 (preambulumbekezdések), COMP 4 (preambulumbekezdések), COMP 5 (preambulumbekezdések), COMP 6 (preambulumbekezdések), COMP 7 (preambulumbekezdések), COMP 8 (preambulumbekezdések), COMP 9 (preambulumbekezdések),
    [Show full text]
  • Manufacturing Discontent: the Rise to Power of Anti-TTIP Groups
    ECIPE OCCASIONAL PAPER • 02/2016 Manufacturing Discontent: The Rise to Power of Anti-TTIP Groups By Matthias Bauer, Senior Economist* *Special thanks to Karen Rudolph (Otto-Friedrich-University Bamberg) and Agnieszka Smiatacz (Research Assistant at ECIPE) for research support all along the process of the preparation of this study. ecipe occasional paper — no. 02/2016 ABSTRACT Old beliefs, new symbols, new faces. In 2013, a small group of German green and left- wing activists, professional campaign NGOs and well-established protectionist organisations set up deceptive communication campaigns against TTIP, the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership between the European Union and the United States. Germany’s anti-TTIP NGOs explicitly aimed to take German-centred protests to other European countries. Their reasoning is contradictory and logically inconsistent. Their messages are targeted to serve common sense protectionist demands of generally ill-informed citizens and politicians. Thereby, anti-TTIP communication is based on metaphoric messages and far-fetched myths to effectively evoke citizens’ emotions. Together, these groups dominated over 90 percent of online media reporting on TTIP in Germany. Anti-TTIP protest groups in Germany are not only inventive; they are also resourceful. Based on generous public funding and opaque private donations, green and left-wing political parties, political foundations, clerical and environmental groups, and well-established anti-globalisation organisations maintain influential campaign networks. Protest groups’ activities are coordinated by a number of former and current green and left-wing politicians and political parties that search for anti-establishment political profiles. As Wallon blockage mentality regarding CETA, the trade and investment agreement between the European Union and Canada, demonstrates, Germany’s anti-TTIP groups’ attempts to undermine EU trade policy bear the risk of coming to fruition in other Eurpean countries.
    [Show full text]
  • 12.5.2021 A9-0116/28 Amendment 28 Tiemo Wölken, Alex Agius Saliba
    12.5.2021 A9-0116/28 Amendment 28 Tiemo Wölken, Alex Agius Saliba, Rasmus Andresen, Eric Andrieu, Maria Arena, Katarina Barley, Gabriele Bischoff, Udo Bullmann, Delara Burkhardt, Anna Cavazzini, Anna Deparnay-Grunenberg, Pascal Durand, Bas Eickhout, Engin Eroglu, Ismail Ertug, Niels Fuglsang, Claudia Gamon, Evelyne Gebhardt, Giorgos Georgiou, Anja Hazekamp, Hannes Heide, Petra Kammerevert, Dietmar Köster, Constanze Krehl, Bernd Lange, Liudas Mažylis, Ulrike Müller, Maria Noichl, Jutta Paulus, Sándor Rónai, Christel Schaldemose, Andreas Schieder, Joachim Schuster, Günther Sidl, Birgit Sippel, Vera Tax, Kathleen Van Brempt, Marianne Vind, Angelika Winzig, Carlos Zorrinho Report A9-0116/2021 Jens Geier European Strategy for Hydrogen (2020/2242(INI)) Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 Motion for a resolution Amendment 4. Is convinced that hydrogen 4. Is convinced that hydrogen produced from renewable sources is key to produced from renewable sources is key to the EU’s energy transition, as only the EU’s energy transition, as only renewable hydrogen can sustainably renewable hydrogen can sustainably contribute to achieving climate neutrality contribute to achieving climate neutrality in the long term and avoid lock-in effects in the long term and avoid lock-in effects and stranded assets; notes with concern and stranded assets; notes with concern that renewable hydrogen is not yet that renewable hydrogen is not yet competitive; therefore urges the competitive; therefore urges the Commission and the Member States to Commission and the Member
    [Show full text]
  • 070723/EU XXV. GP Eingelangt Am 26/06/15
    070723/EU XXV. GP Eingelangt am 26/06/15 Council of the European Union General Secretariat Brussels, 26 June 2015 CM 3154/15 OJ CRP1 COMMUNICATION NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROVISIONAL AGENDA Contact: [email protected] Tel./Fax: 0032.2.2816167/8100 Subject: 2548th meeting of the PERMANENT REPRESENTATIVES COMMITTEE (Part 1) Date: 30 June 2015 Time: 9.30 Venue: COUNCIL JUSTUS LIPSIUS BUILDING Rue de la Loi 175, 1048 BRUSSELS I (1) - Replies to written questions put to the Council by Members of the European Parliament (+) a) P-004211/2015 - Elena Valenciano (S&D) and Iratxe García Pérez (S&D) Rape within marriage 10202/15 PE-QE 321 b) E-004531/2015 - Siôn Simon (S&D) Male and female staff involved in the EU police mission for the Palestinian territories (EUPOL COPPS) 9555/15 PE-QE 285 CM 3154/15 1 EN www.parlament.gv.at c) E-005209/2015 - Bas Eickhout (Verts/ALE) and Eva Joly (Verts/ALE) Tax evasion by Eldorado 10236/15 PE-QE 323 d) E-005598/2015 - Soraya Post (S&D), Benedek Jávor (Verts/ALE), Anna Hedh (S&D), Nicola Caputo (S&D), Jutta Steinruck (S&D), Marc Tarabella (S&D), Péter Niedermüller (S&D), Nessa Childers (S&D), Tibor Szanyi (S&D), Christine Revault D'Allonnes Bonnefoy (S&D), Michela Giuffrida (S&D), Eider Gardiazabal Rubial (S&D), Kashetu Kyenge (S&D), Tanja Fajon (S&D), Juan Fernando López Aguilar (S&D), Brando Benifei (S&D), Maria Noichl (S&D), -RVp%ODQFR/ySH] 6 ' .U\VW\QDà\EDFND 6 ' .DWKOHHQ9DQ%UHPSW 6 ' Eric Andrieu (S&D), Afzal Khan (S&' 'DPLDQ'UăJKLFL 6 ' 0DOLQ%M|UN *8(1*/ %RGLO&HEDOORV 9HUWV$/( &HFLOLD:LNVWU|P
    [Show full text]
  • Helena Dalli, European Commissioner for Equality
    Members of the European Parliament’s Intergroup on LGBTI Rights Intergroup on Children’s Rights To: Helena Dalli, European Commissioner for Equality Brussels, 20 March 2020 Subject: Protection of rainbow families and their children as regards their freedom of movement Honorable Commissioner, Freedom of movement is a fundamental right and needs to be guaranteed for all EU citizens, regardless of their sexual orientation or gender identity. Especially children in rainbow families must be fully protected from a situation of legal uncertainty and emotional limbo created by the interpretation and application of uneven rules across the European Union. EU citizens and their family members have the right to move freely and live in another EU country1. This very same right is appallingly denied to rainbow families and their children in some member states, where national and local authorities refuse to recognise their family status – as this has already legally been established in another EU Member State – and deprive them of their fundamental rights which they derive from EU law. This legal patchwork creates a situation in which same-sex spouses and their children are less protected than different-sex spouses regarding parental rights, the citizenship of their children, tax credits, access to health care, parental leave and inheritance. Differences in legal gender recognition also negatively impact on trans parents moving to Member States without similar mechanisms, resulting in difficulties or impossibility to recognise their parenthood. In some cases, these parents and their children receive no protection and their families are not even recognised to exist. We believe that every family should continue to exist when crossing EU borders.
    [Show full text]
  • 5.9.2018 A8-0245/131 Amendment 131 Tiemo Wölken, Catherine
    5.9.2018 A8-0245/131 Amendment 131 Tiemo Wölken, Catherine Stihler, Josef Weidenholzer, Kati Piri, Yana Toom, Monika Beňová, Tamás Meszerics, Sylvia-Yvonne Kaufmann, Kerstin Westphal, Arne Lietz, Dietmar Köster, Adam Gierek, Krystyna Łybacka, Martina Werner, Bernd Lange, Peter Simon, Brando Benifei, Constanze Krehl, Jo Leinen, Jens Geier, Karoline Graswander-Hainz, Ulrike Rodust, Petra Kammerevert, Momchil Nekov, Daniele Viotti, Arndt Kohn, Michael Detjen, Gabriele Preuß, Maria Noichl, Iris Hoffmann, Ismail Ertug, Joachim Schuster, Paul Tang, Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg, Nessa Childers, Birgit Sippel, Evelyn Regner, Eugen Freund, Michel Reimon, Thomas Waitz, Monika Vana, Martin Sonneborn, Igor Šoltes, Jakop Dalunde, Cornelia Ernst, Molly Scott Cato, Alyn Smith, Max Andersson, Bodil Valero, Linnéa Engström, Martina Michels Report A8-0245/2018 Axel Voss Copyright in the Digital Single Market COM(2016)0593 – C8-0383/2016 – 2016/0280(COD) Proposal for a directive Recital 38 – paragraph 1 a (new) Text proposed by the Commission Amendment In accordance with Article 11(2), the responsibility of information society service providers pursuant to Article 13 should not extend to acts of hyperlinking in respect of press publications. Or. en AM\P8_AMA(2018)0245(131-136)_EN.docx PE624.050v01-00 EN United in diversity EN 5.9.2018 A8-0245/132 Amendment 132 Tiemo Wölken, Catherine Stihler, Josef Weidenholzer, Kati Piri, Yana Toom, Monika Beňová, Tamás Meszerics, Sylvia-Yvonne Kaufmann, Kerstin Westphal, Arne Lietz, Dietmar Köster, Adam Gierek,
    [Show full text]
  • B-8-2018-0484 EN.Pdf
    European Parliament 2014-2019 Plenary sitting B8-0484/2018 17.10.2018 MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION further to Question for Oral Answer B8-0410/2018 pursuant to Rule 128(5) of the Rules of Procedure on animal welfare, antimicrobial use and the environmental impact of industrial broiler farming (2018/2858(RSP)) Anja Hazekamp, Stefan Eck, Kateřina Konečná, Patrick Le Hyaric, Dimitrios Papadimoulis, Merja Kyllönen, Stelios Kouloglou, Marisa Matias, Maria Lidia Senra Rodríguez, Paloma López Bermejo on behalf of the GUE/NGL Group Keith Taylor, Thomas Waitz, Maria Heubuch, Martin Häusling, Yannick Jadot, Marco Affronte, Michèle Rivasi, Pascal Durand, Philippe Lamberts, Karima Delli, Eva Joly, Linnéa Engström, Jakop Dalunde, Margrete Auken, Sven Giegold, Ska Keller, Igor Šoltes, Florent Marcellesi, Bart Staes, Tilly Metz, Bronis Ropė, Ana Miranda, Jordi Solé, Heidi Hautala, Bodil Valero, Julia Reda, Judith Sargentini, Molly Scott Cato, Michel Reimon, Klaus Buchner, Bas Eickhout on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group Karin Kadenbach, Pavel Poc, Jytte Guteland, Maria Noichl, Miriam Dalli, Jeppe Kofod, David Martin, Julie Ward, Kathleen Van Brempt, Miltiadis Kyrkos on behalf of the S&D Group Eleonora Evi, Marco Zullo, Piernicola Pedicini, Rosa D’Amato, Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Agea on behalf of the EFDD Group RE\1166294EN.docx PE624.175v01-00 EN United in diversity EN PE624.175v01-00 2/8 RE\1166294EN.docx EN B8-0484/2018 European Parliament resolution on animal welfare, antimicrobial use and the environmental impact of industrial broiler farming (2018/2858(RSP))
    [Show full text]
  • 1 EU Commissioner for Home Affairs Ylva Johansson Brussels, 30
    EU Commissioner for Home Affairs Ylva Johansson Brussels, 30 October 2020 Dear Commissioner Johansson, It has been nearly two months since the fire in Moria left more than 12,000 persons destitute and the response from Greece, the EU and member states has been pitiful. Whilst responding to urgent needs warranted setting up a temporary camp on Lesvos, we now risk seeing this temporary solution turning into a permanent one. But, based on the account of refugees themselves and experienced service providers, the conditions in the new camp are worse than the conditions in Moria. Almost 8,000 people – mostly families with children – have been forced to live in tents and face dire living conditions. Rapid protection assessments1 carried out at the end of September identified numerous risks to the people living in the camp. These include limited access to food with reports of residents fainting out of hunger, inadequate measures against Covid-19 as well as no drainage nor sewerage system on site, with only one toilet being shared by twenty people and no access for persons with physical disabilities. Due to a lack of running water, residents are forced to wash themselves in the sea – this raises a risk to children who could drown. This lack of sanitary facilities coupled with the insufficient lighting exposes women to an increased risk of sexual and gender-based violence. Residents are unable to access health services or legal aid. Children have no access to education and truly risk becoming a lost generation. We are increasingly concerned that the camp, located by the beach, will not withstand the against adverse weather conditions, such as strong wind and rain.
    [Show full text]