DOCSLIB.ORG

Proposed Wharf and Dredging Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Proposed Wharf and Dredging Project PROPOSED WHARF AND DREDGING PROJECT RESOURCE CONSENT APPLICATIONS AND DESCRIPTION AND ASSESSMENT OF EFFECTS ON THE ENVIRONMENT: VOLUME 1 PREPARED FOR PORT OF NAPIER LTD NOVEMBER 2017 PROPOSED WHARF AND DREDGING PROJECT RESOURCE CONSENT APPLICATIONS AND DESCRIPTION AND ASSESSMENT OF EFFECTS ON THE ENVIRONMENT PREPARED FOR PORT OF NAPIER LTD NOVEMBER 2017 – VOLUME 1 Allan Planning and Research Ltd QUALITY STATEMENT Project Manager: Michel de Vos, Port of Napier Ltd Document Prepared By: Sylvia Allan, Allan Planning and Research Ltd Grant Russell, Stantec New Zealand Reviewed By: Napier Port Programme Steering Group Lara Blomfield – Sainsbury, Logan & Williams Paul Majurey – Atkins, Holm, Majurey Allan Planning and Research Ltd Napier Port Proposed Wharf and Dredging Project – VOLUME 1 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................................................................. I Proposal .................................................................................................................................................................. i Proposed New Wharf (Wharf 6) .............................................................................................................................. i Proposed Dredging .................................................................................................................................................. i Proposed Disposal Area ......................................................................................................................................... ii Summary of Consents Sought ................................................................................................................................ ii Summary of Effects on the Environment ............................................................................................................... v Policy Analysis ....................................................................................................................................................... vi Conditions ............................................................................................................................................................ vii PART I: APPLICATIONS ............................................................................................................................................ 1 APPLICATION SUMMARY TABLE............................................................................................................................... 2 RESOURCE CONSENT APPLICATION FORMS ............................................................................................................. 3 PART II: DESCRIPTION AND ASSESSMENT OF EFFECTS ON THE ENVIRONMENT ................................................... 21 1. INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................................... 22 1.1. Purpose ..................................................................................................................................................... 22 1.2. Structure of the Report ............................................................................................................................. 23 1.3. Context and Background ........................................................................................................................... 24 2. EXISTING NAPIER PORT ................................................................................................................................... 27 2.1. Approach Channel and the Main Breakwater ............................................................................................ 27 2.2. Fairway, Channels and Swinging Basin ...................................................................................................... 27 2.3. Berths and Inner Harbour .......................................................................................................................... 27 2.4. Ownership and Status of Land/Seabed ..................................................................................................... 28 2.5. Port Activities ............................................................................................................................................ 28 3. PROJECT DESCRIPTION.................................................................................................................................... 33 3.1. General ...................................................................................................................................................... 33 3.2. Wharf No.6 Description ............................................................................................................................. 33 3.3. Wharf Construction Methodology ............................................................................................................. 38 3.4. Capital Dredging ........................................................................................................................................ 43 3.5. Disposal of Material from Capital Dredging .............................................................................................. 48 3.6. Maintenance Dredging .............................................................................................................................. 50 4. REASONS FOR THE PROJECT ........................................................................................................................... 51 4.1. Background ............................................................................................................................................... 51 4.2. Increased Vessel Size ................................................................................................................................. 51 Napier Port – Proposed Wharf and Dredging Project November 2017 4.3. Berth Utilisation and Operational Capacity ............................................................................................... 54 4.4. Inner Swinging Basin limitations ............................................................................................................... 55 4.5. Aging Assets .............................................................................................................................................. 56 4.6. Conclusion ................................................................................................................................................. 56 5. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED ........................................................................................................................... 58 5.1. Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 58 5.2. Wharf Options ........................................................................................................................................... 58 5.3. Design Development – Channel and Swinging Basin ................................................................................. 60 5.4. Disposal of Dredged Material .................................................................................................................... 61 5.5. Summary ................................................................................................................................................... 65 6. STATUTORY FRAMEWORK .............................................................................................................................. 66 6.1. RMA Context ............................................................................................................................................. 66 6.2. Hawke’s Bay Regional Coastal Environment Plan ...................................................................................... 71 6.3. Napier City District Plan ............................................................................................................................ 76 6.4. Summary of Resource Consent Requirements .......................................................................................... 77 6.5. Other Matters ........................................................................................................................................... 78 7. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT, SPECIALIST STUDIES UNDERTAKEN AND APPROACH TO THE ASSESSMENT OF EFFECTS ............................................................................................................................... 80 7.1. Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 80 7.2. Geographical Setting ................................................................................................................................. 80 7.3. Access to the Port ..................................................................................................................................... 81 7.4. The Coast in the Vicinity of Port Napier .................................................................................................... 82 7.5. The Coastal Marine Area in the Vicinity of the Port .................................................................................. 82 7.6. Climate and Weather ...............................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • V. Inland Ports Planningand Cargos Handling Opera Tion*
    V. INLAND PORTS PLANNINGAND CARGOS HANDLING OPERA TION* Inland Ports Planning General The term inland waterway port or an inland waterway terminal conveys the idea of an end point. Indeed, traditionally, ports were perceived as end points of the transport system whereby water transport of cargoeswas either originated or terminated. However, from a broader point of view, the one encompassingthe so-called "c~ain of transport", ports or terminals are neither starting nor ending points; they are simply the intermediate points where cargoesare transferred between the links in the transport chain. The emphasis on the transfer function in this introductory section is made since: (a) Ports' main function is to move the cargo and to avoid accumulating and damaging it; (b) In order to efficiently fulfill their transfer function, ports or terminals have to possess convenient access(rail and road) to the connecting modes of transport. broader definition ora port seems especially appropriate for our discussion on inland waterway transportation (IWT). IWT is part of the domestic transportation system which also includes rail and road transpiration. IWT, unlike rail and road transportation, can oQly connectpoints which are locatea on the waterway network. Consequently, in most caSes othercomplementary land transportation modes are required for the entire origin-to-destinationtransport. In other words, since in most casesthe IWT cargo does not originate or terminate atthe port site itself, the main function of the inland port is to transfer the cargo between IWTvessels, trains, and trucks. The inland ports are important for the economic development of a country. The inland port, therail, the road and the seaport are equally important.
    [Show full text]
  • Potomac River Transporation Plan.Indd
    Potomac River Transportation Framework Plan Washington DC, Virginia, Maryland Water transportation is the most economical, energy effi cient and environmentally friendly transportation that exists for major cities today. The vast river network that was the original lifeblood of the Washington, DC region remains underutilized. The Potomac River Transportation Framework Plan is a comprehensive master plan outlining a water based transportation network on the Potomac and Anacostia Rivers in Washington, DC, Maryland and Virginia, for commuters, tourists and the federal government (defense and civilian evacuations). This plan outlines an enormous opportunity to expand the transportation network at a fraction of the cost (both in dollars and environmental impact) of other transportation modes. The plan includes intermodal connections to the existing land based public transportation system. See Detail Plan GEORGETOWN REGIONAL PLAN KENNEDY CENTER RFK STADIUM NATIONAL MALL THE WHARF BASEBALL The plan to the left GEORGETOWN STADIUM NAVY YARD PENTAGON BUZZARD POINT/ SOCCER STADIUM POPLAR POINT illustrates the reach of FORT MCNAIR JBAB the transporation plan KENNEDY CENTER that includes Virginia, NATIONAL AIRPORT RFK STADIUM JBAB / ST. ELIZABETHS SOUTH Maryland, and the DAINGERFIELD ISLAND NATIONAL MALL GENON SITE District of Columbia, CANAL CENTER ROBINSON TERMINAL NORTH fully integrated with THE OLD TOWN- KING STREET existing land based WHARF ROBINSON TERMINAL SOUTH BASEBALL PENTAGON STADIUM NAVY YARD JONES POINT transporation. NATIONAL HARBOR POPLAR POINT BUZZARD POINT/SOCCER STADIUM FORT MCNAIR JBAB A TERMINAL ‘A’ Both Plans illustrate B TERMINAL ‘B’ C TERMINAL ‘C’ potential routes and landings for D TERMINAL ‘D’ MOUNT VERNON FORT WASHINGTON Commuters, Tourists NATIONAL AIRPORT and the Federal JBAB / ST.
    [Show full text]
  • Marinas of Anne Arundel County
    Marina Inventory Of Anne Arundel County 2018 Office of Planning & Zoning Long Range Planning Division Marina Inventory Of Anne Arundel County July 2018 Anne Arundel County Office of Planning and Zoning Long Range Planning Division ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Office of Planning and Zoning Philip R. Hager, Planning and Zoning Officer Lynn Miller, Assistant Planning and Zoning Officer Project Team Long Range Planning Division Cindy Carrier, Planning Administrator Mark Wildonger, Senior Planner Patrick Hughes, Senior Planner Andrea Gerhard, Planner II Special Thanks to VisitAnnapolis.org for the use of the cover photo showing Herrington Harbor. Table of Contents Background Marinas Commercial Marinas Community Marinas Impacts of Marinas Direct Benefit Census Data and Economic Impact Other Waterfront Sites in the County Appendix A – Listing of Marinas in Anne Arundel County, 2018 Appendix B – Location Maps of Marinas in Anne Arundel County, 2018 Office of Planning & Zoning Long Range Planning Division Marinas of Anne Arundel County Background Anne Arundel County has approximately 533 miles of shoreline along the Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries. This resource provides the opportunity for the marine industry to flourish, providing services to the commercial and recreational boaters. In 1980, the first Boating and Marina Study was completed in the County. At that time, the County had 57 marinas and 1,767 boat slips.1 Since that time the County has experienced significant growth in all aspects of its economy including the marine industry. As of June 2018, there are a total of 303 marinas containing at total of 12,035 boat slips (Table 1). This report was prepared as an update to the 1997 and 2010 marina inventories2 and includes an updated inventory and mapping of marinas in the County.
    [Show full text]
  • Auckland Strike
    THE MARCH 2018 TRANSPORThe journal of the RMTU – NZ'sT largest WORKER specialist transport union Auckland strike 2 CONTENTS EDITORIAL ISSUE 1 • march 2018 "On page 14 there is reference to Saida Abad, WHOLE BODY VIBRATION the first female loco 7 engineer in Morocco. I found this billboard with her very moving quote whilst in London recently." Tana Umaga lends a hand to campaign to overcome WBV among LEs. Wayne Butson 10 HISTORIC FIRST General secretary RMTU The entire KiwiRail board made an historic first visit to Hutt workshops Is this the year the recently. MORROCAN CONFERENCE dog bites back? 14 ELCOME to the first issue ofThe Transport Worker magazine for 2018 which, as always, is packed full of just some of the things that your RMTU Union does in the course of its organising for members. delegate Last year ended with a change of Government which should Christine prove to be good news for RMTU members as the governing partners and their sup- Fisiihoi trav- portW partners all have policies which are strongly supportive of rail, ports and the elled all the transport logistics sectors. way to According to the Chinese calendar, 2018 is the year of the dog. However, in my Marrakech view, 2018 is going to be a year of considerable change for RMTU members. We have and was seen Transdev Auckland alter from being a reasonable employer who we have been blown away! doing business with since 2002 to one where dealing with most items has become combative and confrontational. Transdev Wellington is an employer with much less of a working history but we COVER PHOTOGRAPH: Auckland RMTU were able to work with them on the lead up to them taking over the Wellington members pledging solidarity outside Britomart Metro contract and yet, from almost the get go after they took over the running of Place.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual-Report-2017-Stepping-Ahead.Pdf
    STEPPING AHEAD ANNUAL REPORT 2017: PART 1of 2 Napier Port is stepping ahead. We’re investing now to build a bright future for our customers, our staff, the economy and our community. CONTENTS CHAIRMAN’S REPORT 2 CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S REPORT 4 YEAR’S HIGHLIGHTS 6 STEPPING UP 9 FUTURE-PROOFING OUR PORT 10 BUILDING OUR FUTURE 12 A STANDING OVATION 16 OPERATIONAL PERFORMANCE 18 FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE 22 SENIOR MANAGEMENT TEAM 23 BETTER PEOPLE 24 BETTER ANSWERS 26 HEALTH & SAFETY 28 COMMUNITY 30 ENVIRONMENT 32 END OF AN ERA 34 ANNUAL REPORT 2017: PART 1 of 2 • 1 CHAIRMAN’S REPORT It has been a remarkable year for Napier Port. The efforts of staff and the strong leadership of the senior management team enabled Napier Port to respond swiftly to the disruption in the national supply chain caused by the Kaikoura earthquake. Our people and culture are our most important taonga and investing in them has created a stronger company. The health and safety of every person on and significant investment will be required port is the board’s top priority. Reflecting in order to ensure the port can handle this this, the Health and Safety Committee growth in our cargo base. transitioned to a whole-of-board function Napier Port operates in a global this year, emphasising that every director environment and we must sustain our is accountable when it comes to safety. relevance for both shippers and shipping All directors are now spending time in the lines. Having the right infrastructure in operational environment to strengthen place is critical to ensuring shipping lines our understanding of the risks and continue to take our high-value products safety challenges presented by a port to the world at competitive rates.
    [Show full text]
  • Our People Your Growth
    OUR PEOPLE YOUR GROWTH PORT OF NAPIER LIMITED ANNUAL REPORT 2014 CONTENTS RETIRING CHAIRMAN, JIM SCOTLAND 4 CHAIRMAN DESIGNATE, ALASDAIR MACLEOD 5 CENTRAL NEW ZEALAND’S LEADING INTERNATIONAL SEA PORT 6 Napier is Central New Zealand’s leading A DAY IN THE LIFE OF AN EXTENDED international sea port. SUPPLY CHAIN 10 Our customer base extends well beyond FINANCIALS 17 Hawke’s Bay, into the furthest corners of INVESTING FOR THE FUTURE 18 Central New Zealand. BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT 22 This year we feature an example of an extended supply chain, one that originates BETTER PEOPLE, BETTER ANSWERS 23 in Karioi, near Ohakune. HEALTH AND SAFETY 28 A partnership between our customer SUSTAINABILITY 29 WPI, KiwiRail and Napier Port… STAKEHOLDER AND COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT 30 A GENERATION ON 31 BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND MANAGEMENT TEAM 34 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE 36 DIRECTORS’ REPORT 38 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 41 INCOME STATEMENT 42 STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME 42 STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY 43 STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION 44 STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS 45 RECONCILIATION OF SURPLUS AFTER TAXATION TO CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES 46 NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 47 AUDITOR’S REPORT 63 Cover: Hughe Ede, Senior Operator, WPI Night Crew Chace Rodda, Launch/Tugmaster 2 PORT OF NAPIER LIMITED ANNUAL REPORT 2014 PORT OF NAPIER LIMITED ANNUAL REPORT 2014 3 RETIRING CHAIRMAN, JIM SCOTLAND “It has been a privilege to Chair the Board of increasingly competitive and dynamic environment. Napier Port over a turbulent and challenging period. The results over the past 10 years are clearly shown Notwithstanding major changes in cargo handled and in the table below.
    [Show full text]
  • Maritime Transportation Research and Education Center Tier 1 University Transportation Center U.S. Department of Transportation
    MARITIME TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH AND EDUCATION CENTER TIER 1 UNIVERSITY TRANSPORTATION CENTER U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Transit-Oriented Development and Ports: National Analysis across the United States and a Case Study of New Orleans Project Start Date: October 2013 Project End Date: September 2017 Principal Investigator: John L. Renne, Ph.D., AICP Director and Associate Professor, Center for Urban and Environmental Solutions School of Urban and Regional Planning Florida Atlantic University Building 44, Room 284 777 Glades Road Boca Raton, Florida 33431 561-297-4281 [email protected] Honorary Research Associate Transport Studies Unit, School of Geography and the Environment University of Oxford Final Report Date: November 2017 FINAL RESEARCH REPORT Prepared for: Maritime Transportation Research and Education Center University of Arkansas 4190 Bell Engineering Center Fayetteville, AR 72701 479-575-6021 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT This material is based upon work supported by the U.S. Department of Transportation under Grant Award Number DTRT13-G-UTC50. The work was conducted through the Maritime Transportation Research and Education Center (MarTREC) at the University of Arkansas. In partnership with and as a member of the MarTREC consortium, this project was funded through the University of New Orleans Transportation Institute, where Dr. John L. Renne was employed until the end of 2015. Dr. Renne would like to acknowledge Tara Tolford and Estefania Mayorga for their efforts on the data analysis and assistance with the report. He is grateful to all of the interviewees who donated their time for the benefit of this study. Finally, Dr. Renne wishes to thank James Amdal for his expertise and assistance on this project.
    [Show full text]
  • Feasibility Analysis
    Utah Inland Port - Feasibility Analysis prepared for World Trade Center - Utah Utah Governor's Office of Economic Development prepared by Cambridge Systematics, Inc Global Logistics Development Partners, Inc www.camsys.com report Utah Inland Port - Feasibility Analysis prepared for World Trade Center - Utah & Utah Governor's Office of Economic Development prepared by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. 115 South LaSalle Street, Suite 2200 Chicago, IL 60603 Global Logistics Development Partners 14362 N. Frank Lloyd Wright Blvd. Suite 1000 Scottsdale, AZ 85260 USA date December 29, 2017 Utah Inland Port - Feasibility Analysis Table of Contents Executive Summary ..................................................................................................... 2-7 Summary of Recommendations: .............................................................. 2-8 1.0 Introduction ....................................................................................................... 2-14 2.0 Inland Port Typology ....................................................................................... 2-17 2.1 What is an Inland Port?............................................................................ 2-17 2.2 Where are Existing Inland Ports? ........................................................... 2-17 Inland Port Types ..................................................................................... 2-17 Port Profile: DuisburgPort ....................................................................... 2-19 Port Profile: CentrePort Canada
    [Show full text]
  • Port of Houston Authority
    Port of Houston Authority Tariff No. 14 January 1, 2020 Additional Rates, Rules, and Regulations Governing the Fentress Bracewell Barbours Cut Container Terminal EXECUTIVE OFFICES: 111 East Loop North - Houston, Texas 77029 USA P. O. Box 2562 - Houston, Texas 77252-2562 Phone (713) 670-2400 - Fax (713) 670-2564 Barbours Cut Container Terminal 1515 East Barbours Cut Boulevard – La Porte, Texas 77571 Phone (281) 470-1800 - Fax (281) 470-5580 PORT OF HOUSTON TARIFF NO. 14 Page No. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION ONE: DEFINITIONS AND ABBREVIATIONS SUBJECT SUBRULE PAGE NO. Abbreviations ............................................................................................................ 048 ......................................... 11 Agent or Vessel Agent .............................................................................................. 001 .......................................... 6 Baplie ....................................................................................................................... 002 ........................................... 6 Berth ......................................................................................................................... 003 ........................................... 6 Bonded Storage ....................................................................................................... 004 ........................................... 6 Checking .................................................................................................................. 005
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Maritime Transport 2012
    UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE ON TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT OF MARITIME TRANSPORT 2012 UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE ON TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT OF MARITIME TRANSPORT 2012 New York and Geneva, 2012 ii REVIEW OF MARITIME TRANSPORT 2012 NOTE The Review of Maritime Transport is a recurrent publication prepared by the UNCTAD secretariat since 1968 with the aim of fostering the transparency of maritime markets and analysing relevant developments. Any factual or editorial corrections that may prove QHFHVVDU\EDVHGRQFRPPHQWVPDGHE\*RYHUQPHQWVZLOOEHUHƅHFWHGLQDFRUULJHQGXPWREHLVVXHGVXEVHTXHQWO\ * * * 6\PEROVRI8QLWHG1DWLRQVGRFXPHQWVDUHFRPSRVHGRIFDSLWDOOHWWHUVFRPELQHGZLWKƄJXUHV8VHRIVXFKDV\PEROLQGLFDWHVD reference to a United Nations document. * * * The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. * * * 0DWHULDOLQWKLVSXEOLFDWLRQPD\EHIUHHO\TXRWHGRUUHSULQWHGEXWDFNQRZOHGJHPHQWLVUHTXHVWHGZLWKUHIHUHQFHWRWKHGRFXPHQW QXPEHU VHHEHORZ $FRS\RIWKHSXEOLFDWLRQFRQWDLQLQJWKHTXRWDWLRQRUUHSULQWVKRXOGEHVHQWWRWKH81&7$'VHFUHWDULDWDWWKH following address: Palais des Nations, CH-1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland. UNCTAD/RMT/2012 UNITED NATIONS PUBLICATION Sales no. E.12.II.D.17 ISBN 978-92-1-112860-4 e-ISBN 978-92-1-055950-8 ISSN 0566-7682 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Review of Maritime Transport
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report Summary
    Te whakapakari tahi i tō tātau taiao. Enhancing our environment together. 2019-2020 Annual Report Summary hbrc.govt.nz hbrc.govt.nz We continue to drive progress toward a healthy environment. 2019-2020 SUMMARY ANNUAL REPORT Part 1 – Introduction | Kupu Whakataki 4 Part 2 – Groups of Activities | Ngā Whakaroputanga Kaupapa 16 Part 3 – Financials | Pūronga Pūtea 36 Audit – Independent Auditor’s Report | He Ripoata Arotake Pūtea 40 ISBN Print: 978-0-947499-40-2 ISBN Digital: 978-0-947499-40-2 HBRC Publication Number 5545 Adapting to change~ Three key impacts set the background for the 2019-20 financial year – the global COVID-19 pandemic, a severe drought and the ongoing threat of climate change. [email protected] | +64 6 835 9200 159 Dalton Street. Napier 4110 Private Bag 6006, Napier 4142 hbrc.govt.nz INTRODUCTION KUPU WHAKATI Introduction MESSAGE FROM THE CHAIR & CHIEF EXECUTIVE HE KUPU NĀ TE TOIHAU ME TE KAIWHAKAHAERE MATUA Adapting to change “ Three key impacts set the background for the 2019-20 financial year – the global COVID-19 pandemic, a severe drought and the ongoing threat of climate change.” Kia ora koutou It has been an extraordinary year on many levels, The sharemarket float of Napier Port on the New one in which we relied more heavily on technology Zealand Stock Exchange in August 2019 concluded than ever before, for essential service delivery and the Regional Council’s lengthy process to enable to support our own staff forced to work remotely the future-proofing of our Port, releasing the during the COVID-19 lockdown.
    [Show full text]
  • Gpm Demolition
    Sheet 7 of 11 MONTH 11 - 40 GPM DEMOLITION 525 11 PHASE 1 B COMPLETE A 6 7 8 9 10 THE TERRACE WATERFRONT 1 2 PARK C 3 C B A GANGPLANK MARINA CAPITAL RECREATION YACHT CLUB PIER Y X Z WHARF MARINA OPERATIONS ACTIVITY 1. Management Office: The Terrace A. Excavation of P9 & P10 Garage 2. Shower, Laundry, and Mail: The Terrace B. Site Prep and Excavation of P6 – P8 Garage 3. Slip Access: Waterfront Park C. Demolition of A-C Docks (Month 12) 4. Marina Parking: Offsite ZONING COMMISSION District of Columbia Case No. 11-03J ZONING COMMISSION District of Columbia CASE NO.11-03J EXHIBITDeleted NO.82A2 Sheet 8 of 11 MONTH 11 - 40 PH 2 CONSTRUCTION 525 11 PHASE 1 C COMPLETE A 6 7 8 9 10 THE TERRACE WATERFRONT 1 2 PARK 3 B GANGPLANK MARINA CAPITAL RECREATION YACHT CLUB PIER Y X Z WHARF MARINA OPERATIONS ACTIVITY 1. Management Office: The Terrace A. Construction of P9 & P10 Garage & Buildings 2. Shower, Laundry, and Mail: The Terrace B. Construction of West Wharf Marina 3. Slip Access: Waterfront Park C. Excavation/Construction of P6 – P8 Garage & Buildings 4. Marina Parking: Offsite Sheet 9 of 11 MONTH 40 P9 & P10 COMPLETION 525 11 PHASE 1 A 9 COMPLETE 6 7 8 3 10 THE TERRACE WB1 WB2 4 3 WATERFRONT 1 2 C PARK B GANGPLANK MARINA CAPITAL RECREATION PIER YACHT CLUB V W Y X Z WHARF MARINA OPERATIONS ACTIVITY 1. Management Office: WB2 A. Construction of P6-P8 & Buildings 2. Shower, Laundry, and Mail: WB2 B.
    [Show full text]