DOCSLIB.ORG

The Battle of Dunbar Author(S): C

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Battle of Dunbar Author(S): C The Battle of Dunbar Author(s): C. H. Firth Source: Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, New Series, Vol. 14 (1900), pp. 19- 52+304 Published by: Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal Historical Society Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3678146 Accessed: 27-06-2016 07:22 UTC Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://about.jstor.org/terms JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Cambridge University Press, Royal Historical Society are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Transactions of the Royal Historical Society This content downloaded from 131.247.112.3 on Mon, 27 Jun 2016 07:22:03 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms THE BATTLE OF DUNBAR BY C. H. FIRTH, WI.A. Read Lov. I6, I899 THE battle of Dunbar has been so often described, that it is a bold undertaking to attempt to describe it again. My only excuse is that a careful study of the old evidence on which the accounts of the battle are based, and the discovery of a new piece of evidence, have led me to believe that the battle was fought in rather a different way, and that the two armies were posted in rather a diff^erent position, from rhat is generally supposed. And, having carefully examined the ground and turned over the evidence again and again, I am the more confirmed in the view which I wish to lay before you. Whether I can suc- ceed in proving my theory or not, it is for historians to judge, but at all events it is sufficientl new to be worth stating. The orthodox or received view of the battle may be briefly stated as follows: That the English army was posted on the Dunbar side of the Brock or Brocksburn, arranged in battle order, as Carlyle says, 'along tne left bank of the Brocksburn and its grassy glen.' That the Scottish army was arrayed along the opposite bank or Berwick side of the burn. That the battle consisted in CromwellXs forcing his way across the stream and ravine in face of the opposition of the Scots. And finally that the real battle, or what Carlyle terms ' the brunt or essential agony of the battle of Dunbaj,' took place just where the London road now crosses the stream. The view put forward in tluis paper is: That the fighting c 2 This content downloaded from 131.247.112.3 on Mon, 27 Jun 2016 07:22:03 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms 2O TR,XNSACTIONS OM' THE ROVAL HISTORICAL SOCIETY which took place at the crossing of the stream was merely a preliminary to the real battle: That in the real battle which followed the two armies were posted at right angles to the stream; both were on the Berwick side of the stream, the English right resting on it, and the Scottish left resting on it; the English with their backs to the sea, the Scots with their backs to the hill: Lastly, that the real site of the ' cssential agony of the battle of Dunbar ' is a mile or so from the place where the London road crosses the stream, an(l is somewhere between the road and the hill. I*he new piece of evidence I have to bring forward is a contemporary plan or picture of the battle, something like the picture-plan of the battle of Naseby given in Rushworth's Col lections and in Sprigge's Snglia Rediviva. Picture-platls of this kind are common in the accounts of seventeenth-century wars, both English and foreign, and in the absence of battle-plans of the modern type they are often of great value. This plan of Dunbar is preserved in the Sutherland ( Clarendon X in the Bodleian Library, but has not been noticed or not sufficiently studied by historians. At first I was inclined to regard it as a mere fancy picture, curiolls and interesting, but of no particular authority. On examination it appeared that a number of details it contained did represent incidents and movements which actuallyoccurred in the battle, and it became a question whether its represen- tation of the general position of the two armies was aIso correct. For it represented the two armies as drawn up, not in the position which modern accounts of the battle had accepted as correct, but in the very different position described aboveo Next came the question who was the author of the map, and what knowledge he possessed of the history ofthe battle. The map is dedicated to the Lord 13rotector Oliver Cromu ell, and a long Latin inseription is printed at the top of it, in which the author gives his name as F. F. This F. F. was undoubtedly a certain Payne Fisher, or, as he preferred to call himself, Fitz- Payne Fisher. Fither was educated at Hart Hall, Oxford, This content downloaded from 131.247.112.3 on Mon, 27 Jun 2016 07:22:03 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms THE BATTLFw OF DUNBAR 2I and at Magdalene College, Cambridge. He then became a soldier of fortune in the Netherlands, served afterwards in the army raised by Charles I. against the Scots, and in the army raised to put down the Irish rebellion. He fought on the King's side at the battle of Marston Moor. After the great civil war was oser Fisher maintained him- self as best he could by his pen, and, abandoning his royalist principles, began to celebrate the victories of the opposite party. Having a great facility in writing Latin verses, he wrote a poem in four books on the battle of Marston Moor, besides panegyrics or congratulatory verses addressed to Crom- well, Ireton, Bradshaw, Ludlow, and other republican leaders. In I 652 a new idea occurred to Fisher. Thomas May, the historiographer of the Long Parliament, was dead, and the Government was looking out for someone to continue his work. It occurred to Fisher to turn historian, and he undertook to write an account of the victories of the republican arms, and in particular of the conquest of Scotland. The Council of State welcomed the idea, granted him a hundred pounds, and recommended him to the commander-in-chief in Scotland.l When Fisher arrived in Scotland he presented a t)etition to the commander-in-chief there, saying that, in accordance with the wishes of the Council and in obedience to his own sense of duty to his country, he was ' determined to write and faithfully transmit to posterity the transactions and matchless achievements of your armie in tllis last expedition.' In order that he might be able to write ' the exact truth of those transactions,' he asked the commander-in-chief to in- struct the officers in Scotland to assist him by supplying the necessary information. He suggested that orders should be given to every regiment ' to draw up a compendious abstract of all the military remarkable passages that have occurred in each respective regiment, from their first advance in this country to this instant.' In addition he requested: ' That froln every regiment a topographical description be drawn (either with ink or black lead) of the most eminent ' Cal. Sfate Eapers, Dom. I65I-2, p. 366. This content downloaded from 131.247.112.3 on Mon, 27 Jun 2016 07:22:03 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms 22 TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL HISTORICAL SOCIETY castles, citadels, forts, with their several situations, as also a slight draught or representation of the chiefest battailes; to the end that they may be afterward more lively engraven in coppe1, to be placed between the divisions of each Idilia or section, that thence the History may be illustrated with more perspicuity, being soe set forth and made visibly obvious to all spectatours.' Fisher obtained his wish.l The commander-in-chief re- commended him to the colonels of the different regiments quartered in Scotland, telling them to give him information about ' such military passages as haa come under your ob- servation,' and also to give him ' free and liberal encourage- ment' of a pecuniary kind to enable him to finish his history. But though Fisher got free quarters, some subscriptions, and probably plenty of information, he never finished his history. The only trace of it in existence is this 'slight draught or representation ' of the battle of Dunbar, which was to have been one of the illustrations of the history.2 At some period during the Protectorate he had it engraved and presented it to Cromwell, no doubt on one of the anniversaries of the battle, or at one of the annual celebrations of the inauguration of Cromwell as Protector. The bearing of these facts on the question of the authority to be attached to this picture-plan is obvious. In the first place, though Fi.sher was a contemptible scribbler, yet, having been a soldier, he was not likely to produce a plan which had no relation to the actual facts of the battle. In the second place, he had access to the best possible information which could be obtained about the battle - namely, the recollections of the men who actually took part in the battle, and that within two years of the event.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Short Note: Mistress Rutherford and Ulster in the Summer of 1634
    Scottish Reformation Society Historical Journal, 1 (2011), 267-271 ISSN 2045-4570 ______ Short Note: Mistress Rutherford and Ulster in the Summer of 1634 D OUGLAS W. B. SOMERSET he spiritual experiences of “Mistress Rutherford” were first published in the Miscellany XIII of the Scottish History Society in 2004.T 1 The exact identity of “Mistress Rutherford” is not known, but she was a niece by marriage to John Muir, laird of Anniston. She was born at the beginning of the seventeenth century, lost her mother at the age of four and her father at the age of nine, and was then brought up by relatives. At the age of fourteen she was sent to Bethia Aird’s school for girls in Edinburgh. Bethia Aird was the daughter of William Aird, who had been minister of St Cuthbert’s in Edinburgh. Her brother John Aird was minister of Newbattle and she was one of Samuel Rutherford’s correspondents. The young “Mistress Rutherford” was thus brought into the heart of Presbyterian religious society in Edinburgh at a critical time when James VI was bent on conforming the Scottish Church to the practices of the Church of England. She was present, for instance, at the communion in the West Kirk, Edinburgh, on Sabbath 7th March 1619 when the minister Richard Dickson administered the Lord’s Supper to sitting communicants, after the Presbyterian manner; for which he was deprived and imprisoned in Dumbarton Castle.2 Mistress Rutherford’s account of her life was written at an unspecified time after the events. She begins at the age of ten and goes through her schooling in Edinburgh, her marriage, her settling in Ulster 1 D.
    [Show full text]
  • Scotland's Greatest
    SCOTLAND’S GREATEST Revival The Second Reformation in Scotland was not only There were strong bonds of fellowship between the dean who was reading Laud’s liturgy. “Villain!”, a national movement of reform in the Church and those who opposed unbiblical practice. They often she said, “Do you say mass in my lug [ear]?” Nation. It was also a period of intense and sus- met for united prayer. John Livingstone tells us that tained religious revival. It was the greatest period there were “great meltings of heart” among the This led to the signing of the National Covenant by of revival in Scotland’s history for the following people of God at that time. The presence of the the leading figures of Church and Nation at Grey- reasons. Holy Spirit was greatly evident. James Wood was friars Kirkyard in 1638. The movement began with a resolute episcopalian who was converted after “but few, and these not honourable”. Alexander 01 It arose out of prayer attending one such meeting. Henderson believed this showed that it was God’s The Stuart kings imposed unbiblical practices on work. the worship and government of the Church of Scot- There were also notable revivals in Ulster, Kirk of land. This intensified particularly in the years follow- Shotts and Ayrshire. In 1628 there was a solemn fast ing 1618. Those who resisted these changes faced across the land in response to the many reasons “Oh, let the King come! increasing persecution. Church members suffered for humbling themselves before God as a nation. for refusing to receive communion in an idolatrous The Holy Spirit was manifest in great power at that Oh, let His kingdom come!” posture.
    [Show full text]
  • Dictionary of National Biography
    Blair 160 Blair ' (4to). He casually names a cosen Blague i. 427, ii. 116). He defended Kames, his ' the surgeon' as attending on the wounded.' intimate friend, when Kames's 'Essays on ' their author to a Neve's i. Abbot Wood's Morality exposed charge [Le Fasti, 577 ; Reg. ; of and answer Fasti, ii. 184; Reg. Whitgift, 3, 269; Keg. infidelity, brought Campbell's to Hume's Miracles under the G-rindall et Bancroft, Kennet; "Wood's Fasti, i. essay upon communications from Dean of notice of Hume i. 222, 227 ; present (TYTLER'S Kames, 198, Rochester, rectors of Bangor, Ewelme, Great 266). He was intimate with Henry Dundas, ii. &c. &c. Newcourt's , afterwards Lord and Braxted, ; Repertorium, Melville, through him 91-2.] A. B. G-. had some influence upon Scotch patronage. He declined to use it in order to succeed BLAIR, HUGH (1718-1800), divine, Robertson as principal of the university, but was born in Edinburgh 7 April 1718. His is said to have been annoyed at being passed father, John Blair, was an Edinburgh mer- over in favour of Dr. Baird. Blair encouraged chant, son of Hugh and grandson of Robert MacPherson to publish the 'Fragments of ' Blair, 1593-1666 [q.v.], chaplain to Charles I. Ancient Poetry in 1760, and eulogised their Hugh Blair was educated at Edinburgh, and merits with more zeal than discretion in ' A entered the university in 1730. An essay irepl Critical Dissertation on the Poems of Ossian, rot) KCI\OV, written whilst he was a student, the son of Fingal,' 1763.
    [Show full text]
  • The Way to Otranto: Gothic Elements
    THE WAY TO OTRANTO: GOTHIC ELEMENTS IN EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY ENGLISH POETRY, 1717-1762 Vahe Saraoorian A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate School of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY December 1970 ii ABSTRACT Although full-length studies have been written about the Gothic novel, no one has undertaken a similar study of poetry, which, if it may not be called "Gothic," surely contains Gothic elements. By examining Gothic elements in eighteenth-century poetry, we can trace through it the background to Horace Walpole's The Castle of Otranto, the first Gothic novel. The evolutionary aspect of the term "Gothic" itself in eighteenth-century criticism was pronounced, yet its various meanings were often related. To the early graveyard poets it was generally associated with the barbarous and uncouth, but to Walpole, writing in the second half of the century, the Gothic was also a source of inspiration and enlightenment. Nevertheless, the Gothic was most frequently associated with the supernatural. Gothic elements were used in the work of the leading eighteenth-century poets. Though an age not often thought remark­ able for its poetic expression, it was an age which clearly exploited the taste for Gothicism, Alexander Pope, Thomas Parnell, Edward Young, Robert Blair, Thomas and Joseph Warton, William Collins, Thomas Gray, and James Macpherson, the nine poets studied, all expressed notes of Gothicism in their poetry. Each poet con­ tributed to the rising taste for Gothicism. Alexander Pope, whose influence on Walpole was considerable, was the first poet of significance in the eighteenth century to write a "Gothic" poem.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Scot's Worthies
    SSOOMMEE SSCCOOTTSS WWOORRTTHHIIEESS FROM WIISHART TO RENWIICK J.R.BroomeJ.R.Broome Scots Worthies from George Wishart to James Renwick J.R. Broome 2009 Gospel Standard Trust Publications 12(b) Roundwood Lane Harpenden Hertfordshire AL5 3BZ © J.R. Broome 2010 ISBN: 978-1-89-783797-9 Cover picture: Edinburgh Castle Printed by Blissett Group Roslin Road London W3 8DH Contents Preface ..................................................................... 4 George Wishart (died 1546)................................... 11 John Knox (1505-1572)......................................... 18 Robert Bruce (1554-1631) ..................................... 53 Alexander Henderson (1583-1646)........................ 59 Robert Blair (1593-1666)....................................... 64 Samuel Rutherford (1660-1661)............................ 71 John Livingstone (1603-1672)............................... 79 William Guthrie (1620-1665) ................................ 86 Captain John Paton (Executed May 9th 1684)....... 92 Alexander Peden (1626-1686) ............................... 99 John Nisbet (1627-1685)...................................... 106 Richard Cameron (1648-1680) ............................ 113 James Renwick (1662-1688)................................ 119 Preface In Scotland, the years from the death of George Wishart at the stake in 1546 until the Glorious Revolution in 1688 were an era of political turmoil and religious persecution. Yet, in the midst of it, the gospel prospered under a divine hand. The Lord raised up a body of able Reformers
    [Show full text]
  • The Westminster Confession of Faith
    John 5:39 "...search the Scriptures..." search search Home Newsletter Puritan Theology Puritan History Puritan Study Puritan Shop Email Us The Westminster Confession of Faith A List of the Members of the Assembly Attendees of the Westminster Assembly and their writings online and off. The Promise and Vow taken by every member admitted to sit in the Assembly: I [NAME] do seriously promise and vow, in the presence of Almighty God, that in this Assembly, whereof I am a member, I will maintain nothing in point of doctrine, but what I believe to be most agreeable to the word of God; nor in point of discipline, but what may make most for God’s glory, and the peace and good of this Church. Admitted to sit and hear in October 1644, the Prince Elector Palatine, and on one occasion permitted to speak. Peers: Algernon, Earl of Northumberland. William, Earl of Bedford. Philip, Earl of Pembroke and Montgomery. William, Earl of Salisbury. Henry, Earl of Holland. Edward, Earl of Manchester. William, Lord Viscount Say and Seale. Edward, Lord Viscount Conway. Philip, Lord Wharton. Edward, Lord Howard of Escrick. Basil, Earl of Denbigh. Oliver, Earl of Bolingbroke. William, Lord Grey of Warkey vice Bedford, Holland, and Conway. Robert, Earl of Essex, Lord General. Robert, Earl of Warwick, Lord High Admiral. Members of the House of Commons: John Selden, Esq. Francis Rous, Esq. Edmund Prideaux, Esq. Sir Henry Vane, Knt., senior. John Glynn, Esq., Recorder of London. John White, Esq. Bouldstrode Whitlocke, Esq. Humphrey Salloway, Esq. Mr. Serjeant Wild. Oliver St. John, Esq., His Majesty’s Solicitor.
    [Show full text]
  • Letters of Samuel Rutherford
    Chapel Library • 2603 West Wright St. • Pensacola, Florida 32505 USA Sending Christ-centered materials from prior centuries worldwide Worldwide: please use the online downloads worldwide without charge. In North America: please write for a printed copy of the 48-page abridgment sent completely without charge. Chapel Library does not necessarily agree with all the doctrinal positions of the authors it publishes. We do not ask for donations, send promotional mailings, or share mailing lists. © Copyright 2005 Chapel Library: annotations. THE LETTERS OF SAMUEL RUTHERFORD (1600-1661) Contents Rutherford’s Life....................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Lady Kenmure........................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 God’s Inexplicable Dealings with His People Well-Ordered,Lack of Ordinances John Kennedy............................................................................................................................................................................................ 4 Deliverance from Shipwreck and Death, Prepare for Death, Use of Trials Robert Cunningham ................................................................................................................................................................................ 5 Consolation to
    [Show full text]
  • 126613760.23.Pdf
    irs PUBLICATIONS OF THE SCOTTISH HISTORY SOCIETY THIRD SERIES VOLUME XXXIV DIARY OF SIR ARCHIBALD JOHNSTON OF WARISTON VOL. Ill 1940 DIARY OF SIR ARCHIBALD JOHNSTON OF WARISTON VOLUME III 1655-1660 Edited from the Original Manuscript, with Notes and Introduction by JAMES D. OGILVIE EDINBURGH Printed at the University Press by T. and A. Constable Ltd. for the Scottish History Society Printed in Great Britain CONTENTS PAGE INTRODUCTION vii DIARY— xiv. 17 April to 10 June 1655 .... 1 xv. 30 July to 10 Sept. 1655 . .5 xvi. 17 Nov. to 26 Dec. 1655 . .11 xvii. 27 Dec. 1655 to 15 Jan. 1656 ... 21 xvm. 16 Jan. to 2 March 1656 .... 24 xix. 3 March to 5 April 1656 .... 27 xx. 5 May to 5 June 1656 ..... 29 xxi. 6 June to 1 July 1656 ..... 34 xxn. 1 July to 27 July 1656 ..... 40 xxm. 1 Sept, to 7 Oct. 1656 ..... 41 xxiv. 8 Oct. to 3 Nov. 1656 ..... 45 xxvi. 4 Nov. to 16 Dec. 1656 ..... 53 xxvii. 10 Feb. to 19 Mar. 1657 .... 57 xxvin. 7 June to 12 July 1657 ..... 76 xxix. 13 July to 8 Sept. 1657 ..... 91 xxx. 20 May to 1 Aug. 1658 ..... 101 xxxi. 24 Aug. to 8 Nov. 1658 ..... 101 xxxn. 9 Nov. 1658 to 23 Jan. 1659 . .103 xxxm. 29 April to 12 June 1659 .... 106 xxxiv. 13 June to 27 Aug. 1659 . .119 xxxv. 28 Aug. to 13 Oct. 1659 .... 134 xxxvi. 14 Oct. to 6 Dec. 1659 . .145 vi WARISTON’S DIARY xxxvn. 7 Dec. to 30 Dec. 1659 155 xxxvm.
    [Show full text]
  • The Arrest and Trial of Archbishop William Laud
    THE ARREST AND TRIAL OF ARCHBISHOP WILLIAM LAUD By NICHOLAS ROBERT CHARLES FORWARD A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham For the degree of MASTER OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Modern History School of Historical Studies College of Arts and law University of Birmingham March 2012 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. Archbishop William Laud was arrested on 18 December 1640, and specific treason charges were brought forward early in 1641. However he did not stand trial until 1644. This study aims to assess the charges; consider the reasons for the significant delay between the arrest and trial; review the law of treason pertaining at the time and how this was applied to Laud; analyse the condemnatory and often vindictive views of Laud within the public sphere as reflected in the pamphlets and newsbooks of the period; and assess in detail the trial itself. Along with Thomas Wentworth, earl of Strafford, Laud was a principle counsellor to the king and a major hate figure for parliament who considered the two men responsible for leading the king astray during the period of the personal rule.
    [Show full text]
  • Receiving Christ Better: the Eucharistic Theology of Robert Bruce
    REFORMED THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY RECEIVING CHRIST BETTER: THE EUCHARISTIC THEOLOGY OF ROBERT BRUCE Thesis Paper Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Course 0CE751 Integrative Thesis by Jeffrey T. Hamling March 2006 To my wife Annmaire, who daily helps me to receive Christ better. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ………………………………………………………………. 2 CHAPTERS 1. Four Views of the Lord’s Supper ……………………………………...… 11 2. The Modern Reformed Church and The Mystery of the Lord’s Supper …. 14 3. The Calvinistic Historical Context of Robert Bruce …………………….. 25 4. Definition of a Sacrament ……………………………………………….. 34 5. The Sacramental Union and Presence of Christ ……………………….... 44 6. The Relationship between the Word and the Sacrament ……………...… 70 CONCLUSION ………………………………………………………………….. 85 APPENDIX: Pastoral Considerations …………………….……………………... 87 BIBLIOGRAPHY ……………………………………………………………….. 108 2 INTRODUCTION The Reverend Robert Bruce, at the age of seventy-seven, had just completed his normal helping of breakfast at his home in Edinburgh, Scotland, when he called to his youngest daughter Martha to bring him another egg. 1 After musing in silence for a minute or two, he suddenly called out, “Hold, daughter, hold; my Master calleth me.” 2 Next, according to historian D. C. MacNicol, He asked that the Bible should be brought, the large house Bible, but his sight failed him, and he could not read. “Cast me up the 8 th of Romans,” cried he, and he repeated much of the latter portion of this scripture, till he came to the last two verses, “I am persuaded that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor principalities, nor powers, nor things present, not things to come, nor height, nor depth, nor any other creature, shall be able to separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord.” “Set my finger on these words,” said the blind dying man: “God be with you my children.
    [Show full text]
  • Truth Before Consequences
    Truth Before Consequences Ian Hamilton 2000 CFOP 003 | Truth Before Consequences The Rutherford Centre for Reformed Theology (www.rcrt.scot), formerly ‘Rutherford House’, had its roots in the Crieff Fellowship, and was named after Samuel Rutherford. CFOP 003 | Truth Before Consequences Truth Before Consequences —Samuel Rutherford (1600–1661) Introduction By any accounts Samuel Rutherford was an extraordinary and remarkable man. The following comment by a contemporary does not overly exaggerate the high esteem in which Rutherford was held by many of his contemporaries: “I have known many great and good ministers in this Church, but for such a piece of clay as Mr Rutherford was, I never knew one in Scotland like him, to whom so many great gifts were given, for he seemed to be altogether taken up with everything good and excellent and useful. He seemed to be always praying, always preaching, always visiting the sick, always catechising, always writing and studying... Many times I thought he would have flown out of the pulpit when he came to speak of Jesus Christ. He was never in his right element but when he was commending him. He would have fallen asleep in bed speaking of Christ.” However idealised a picture of Rutherford this is, there is no doubting or denying that he was one of Scotland’s “spiritual giants.” The early decades of the 17th century were marked by the Crown, through compliant bishops, seeking to bring the Reformed Church under its authority. The heady days of Presbyterian supremacy were an increasingly distant memory. Men like Andrew Melville had been first imprisoned and then exiled by James.
    [Show full text]
  • George Gillespie and the Westminster Assembly: the Defence of Presbyterianismi W.D.J
    GEORGE GILLESPIE AND THE WESTMINSTER ASSEMBLY: THE DEFENCE OF PRESBYTERIANISMI W.D.J. MCKA Y, AGHADOWEY, COLERAINE, NORTHERN IRELAND Introduction George Gillespie is frequently referred to as one of the most prominent of the Scottish Commissioners at the Westminster Assembly, yet in comparison to Samuel Rutherford and Alexander Henderson, Gillespie has received little scholarly attention. In his short life, 2 however, he made a significant contribution to Presbyterian ecclesiology, in addition to his active participation in the Assembly debates ( 167 speeches, cf. Rutherford, 148 speeches, Henderson, 83- by November 1644). This study will consider Gillespie's writings against the background of the Assembly.3 Gillespie was born in Kirkcaldy, in Fife, probably in 1613, a son of the Revd John Gillespie who was minister in the town. Wodrow gives his date of birth as 21 January, but the Session Register of Births and Baptisms for the relevant period has been lost, so certainty is impossible. This material was first given as a lecture to the Presbyterian Historical Society of Ireland on 18 November 1993. A full consideration of Gillespie's views of church government will be found in the author's Church Government in the Writings of George Gillespie: An Ecclesiastical Republic (forthcoming). 2 For an outline of Gillespie's life see William Hetherington's 'Memoir' in The Works of George Gillespie, in The Presbyterian's Armoury, 2 volumes (Edinburgh, 1846). All quotations are taken from this edition. 3 Standard works on the Assembly are: W.M. Hetherington, History of the Westminster Assembly of Divines (Edinburgh, 1856); A.F. Mitchell, The Westminster Assembly, its History and Standards (Edinburgh, 1883); and B.B.
    [Show full text]