DOCSLIB.ORG

Truth Before Consequences

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Truth Before Consequences Ian Hamilton 2000 CFOP 003 | Truth Before Consequences The Rutherford Centre for Reformed Theology (www.rcrt.scot), formerly ‘Rutherford House’, had its roots in the Crieff Fellowship, and was named after Samuel Rutherford. CFOP 003 | Truth Before Consequences Truth Before Consequences —Samuel Rutherford (1600–1661) Introduction By any accounts Samuel Rutherford was an extraordinary and remarkable man. The following comment by a contemporary does not overly exaggerate the high esteem in which Rutherford was held by many of his contemporaries: “I have known many great and good ministers in this Church, but for such a piece of clay as Mr Rutherford was, I never knew one in Scotland like him, to whom so many great gifts were given, for he seemed to be altogether taken up with everything good and excellent and useful. He seemed to be always praying, always preaching, always visiting the sick, always catechising, always writing and studying... Many times I thought he would have flown out of the pulpit when he came to speak of Jesus Christ. He was never in his right element but when he was commending him. He would have fallen asleep in bed speaking of Christ.” However idealised a picture of Rutherford this is, there is no doubting or denying that he was one of Scotland’s “spiritual giants.” The early decades of the 17th century were marked by the Crown, through compliant bishops, seeking to bring the Reformed Church under its authority. The heady days of Presbyterian supremacy were an increasingly distant memory. Men like Andrew Melville had been first imprisoned and then exiled by James. Rutherford grew up, then, in a Church increasingly compromised and subject to the prelatic and episcopal views of James. CFOP 003 | Truth Before Consequences Life & Ministry Conversion Rutherford was born, most probably, in 1600 in the village of Nisbet in Roxburghshire, the son of comfortably off parents. In 1617 he went to Edinburgh University where he excelled in Latin and Greek. Like John Calvin before him, Rutherford makes almost no mention of his conversion, neither its timing nor its circumstances. There are possibly only two references to his conversion in his writings. In a letter to Robert Stuart ( June 17, 1637), he writes, “Ye have gotten a great advantage in the way of heaven, that ye have started to the gate in the morning. Like a fool, as I was, I suffered my sun to be high in the heaven, and near afternoon, before I ever took the gate by the end.” The second reference, which enables us somewhat to narrow down at least the timing of his conversion, occurs in a letter to Lady Kenmuir ( July 28, 1636): “... That honour that I have prayed for these 16 years, with submission to my Lord’s will, my kind Lord hath now bestowed upon me, even to suffer for my royal and princely King Jesus, and for His kingly crown, and the freedom of His Kingdom that His Father hath given Him.” It would be reasonable to assume, then, that Rutherford was around twenty years of age when he was brought to saving faith. It is perhaps no bad thing that we know so little about the particulars of Rutherford’s conversion. At the least, we are being reminded that the vital thing about conversion is not when it happens, or how it happens, but the fact that it happens and shows itself in a transformed, Christ-centred, gladly obedient life! CFOP 003 | Truth Before Consequences Ordination In 1627 Rutherford was ordained and inducted to the charge with which his name is inseparably connected, Anwoth by the Solway. The fact that he was inducted “without giving engagement to the Bishop”, that is without having to acknowledge episcopal authority, provides the first striking example of a principle which ran like a golden thread through Rutherford’s life: “Truth before consequences!!” In a day when evangelicals have too easily accommodated biblical truth to ecclesiastical consensus, Rutherford’s example reminds us of the unyielding faithfulness that God seeks from his servants. It is not for us to play the game of ‘ecclesiastical statesmanship’, in the hope that evangelical influence can be promoted via the altar of ecclesiastical compromise. Like Rutherford, and more importantly like Daniel and the apostles before him, we must always choose to “obey God rather than men”. For the next 10 years, Rutherford ministered happily and effectively in Anwoth. During this time, Rutherford’s first wife died after a long and sore illness. He was no stranger to personal grief and suffering; the comfort his ministry and letters brought to others was forged in the crucible of personal affliction. After Thomas Sydserff became Bishop of Galloway in 1635, Rutherford came increasingly under pressure to conform to episcopal authority. He was conscious that failure to do so could result in his being removed from Anwath. In a letter to Lady Kenmuir (18 January 1636) he writes: “I expect our new prelate shall try my sitting. I hang by a thread, but it is (if I may speak so) of Christ’s spinning. There is no quarrel more honest or honourable than to suffer for truth.” In another letter to Lady Kenmuir on 8 June, 1636, Rutherford wrote, “Our prelate will have us either to swallow our light over and digest it contrary to our stomachs, howbeit we should vomit our conscience ... or then he will try if deprivation can convert us to the ceremonial faith.” CFOP 003 | Truth Before Consequences Exile On 27 July 1636, Rutherford was removed from his charge and exiled to Aberdeen (It might seem strange to us that Aberdeen was considered a suitable place of exile; it was, however, strongly committed to episcopacy, and vigorously opposed the Reformed Presbyterianism so beloved by Rutherford). However much he loved the people of Anwoth and cherished his ministry there, he chose to suffer the consequences of faithfulness to God’s truth, rather than “conform” to ecclesiastical principles that were contrary to Scripture. Rutherford’s cause was not helped by his recently published Exercitationes Apologeticae pro Divina gratia. This substantial defence of the doctrines of grace so “cut the sinews of Arminianism, and galled the Episcopal clergy to the very quick”, that Rutherford’s fate was sealed. [Stevenson’s History Vol 1, 149]. Rutherford was deeply affected by his removal from Anwoth: “Next to Christ, I had but one joy, the apple of the eye of my delights, to preach Christ my Lord, and they have violently plucked that away from me” [to his Parishoners, July 13, 1637]. But while Rutherford’s exile was a sore trial to him, it was used by God to be the means of bringing blessing and comfort to multitudes. During his near two years of exile, Rutherford wrote 220 of his 365 extant letters! If Satan had intended to silence Rutherford by this exile, he found that God’s sovereign wisdom turned for good what he intended for evil! John Macleod described Rutherford’s “Letters” as “The most remarkable series of devotional letters that the literature of the Reformed Church can show”. Even Richard Baxter, one of Rutherford’s most trenchant critics, could write, “Hold off the Bible, such a book of Mr Rutherford’s letters the world never saw the like.” What is remarkable is that Rutherford wrote his letters during a time of great personal trial. His letters flowed from a heart deeply wounded by the sorest of trials. When he wrote, “I find it most true that the greatest temptation out of hell is to live without CFOP 003 | Truth Before Consequences temptations; if my waters would stand they would rot. Faith is the better for the free air and the sharp winter-storm in its face; grace withereth without adversity,” Rutherford was describing his own experience. His trials were great, but the comforts and consolations of Christ were greater: “I never knew before that his love was such in such a measure ... I have a fire within me; I defy all the devils in hell and all the prelates in Scotland to cast water on it.” Rutherford’s greatest trial was his separation from his flock at Anwoth. His letters to them reveal how tenderly and anxiously he cared for them: “my day-thoughts and my night-thoughts are of you: while ye sleep I am afraid of your souls ... My witness is above; your heaven would be two heavens to me, and the salvation of you all as two salvations to me.” (July 13, 1637) During this period Rutherford’s letters throb with the praise of Christ: “I find that my extremity hath sharpened the edge of His love and kindness, as that He seemeth to devise new ways of expressing the sweetness of His love to my soul ... (to John Nevay, minister of Newmilns in the parish of Loudoun, June 15, 1637). It was during this time of exile that Rutherford entertained the idea of going to New England to escape persecution. Some of his friends believed he could find a sphere of useful service on the Continent. Robert Baillie wrote to Reverend William Spang, “Always I take .... [Rutherford] to be among the most learned and best ingynes of our nation. I think he were very able for some profession in your colleges of Utrecht, Groningen, or Rotterdam ... If you could quietly procure him a calling, I think it were a good service to God to relieve one of his troubled ministers; and good to the place he came to, for he is both godly and learned; yea, I think by time he might be an ornament to our nation.” (16th January, 1637) While Rutherford was tempted to leave Scotland, he could never fully contemplate taking such a step.
Recommended publications
  • Humanism and Calvinism for My Parents Humanism and Calvinism

    Humanism and Calvinism for My Parents Humanism and Calvinism

    Humanism and Calvinism For my parents Humanism and Calvinism Andrew Melville and the Universities of Scotland, 1560–1625 STEVEN J. REID University of Glasgow, UK First published 2011 by Ashgate Publishing Published 2016 by Routledge 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN 711 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017, USA Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business Copyright © Steven J. Reid 2011 Steven J. Reid has asserted his moral right under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act, 1988, to be identified as the author of this work. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. Notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used only for identification and explanation without intent to infringe. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Reid, Steven J. Humanism and Calvinism : Andrew Melville and the universities of Scotland, 1560–1625. – (St Andrews studies in Reformation history) 1. Melville, Andrew, 1545–1622–Influence. 2. Universities and colleges – Scotland – History – 16th century. 3. Universities and colleges – Scotland – History – 17th century. 4. Church and college – Scotland – History – 16th century. 5. Church and college – Scotland – History – 17th century. 6. Reformation – Scotland. 7. Humanism – Scotland – History – 16th century. 8. Humanism – Scotland – History – 17th century. 9. University of St. Andrews – History. 10. Education, Higher – Europe – History. I. Title II.
  • Short Note: Mistress Rutherford and Ulster in the Summer of 1634

    Short Note: Mistress Rutherford and Ulster in the Summer of 1634

    Scottish Reformation Society Historical Journal, 1 (2011), 267-271 ISSN 2045-4570 ______ Short Note: Mistress Rutherford and Ulster in the Summer of 1634 D OUGLAS W. B. SOMERSET he spiritual experiences of “Mistress Rutherford” were first published in the Miscellany XIII of the Scottish History Society in 2004.T 1 The exact identity of “Mistress Rutherford” is not known, but she was a niece by marriage to John Muir, laird of Anniston. She was born at the beginning of the seventeenth century, lost her mother at the age of four and her father at the age of nine, and was then brought up by relatives. At the age of fourteen she was sent to Bethia Aird’s school for girls in Edinburgh. Bethia Aird was the daughter of William Aird, who had been minister of St Cuthbert’s in Edinburgh. Her brother John Aird was minister of Newbattle and she was one of Samuel Rutherford’s correspondents. The young “Mistress Rutherford” was thus brought into the heart of Presbyterian religious society in Edinburgh at a critical time when James VI was bent on conforming the Scottish Church to the practices of the Church of England. She was present, for instance, at the communion in the West Kirk, Edinburgh, on Sabbath 7th March 1619 when the minister Richard Dickson administered the Lord’s Supper to sitting communicants, after the Presbyterian manner; for which he was deprived and imprisoned in Dumbarton Castle.2 Mistress Rutherford’s account of her life was written at an unspecified time after the events. She begins at the age of ten and goes through her schooling in Edinburgh, her marriage, her settling in Ulster 1 D.
  • English Radicalism and the Struggle for Reform

    English Radicalism and the Struggle for Reform

    English Radicalism and the Struggle for Reform The Library of Sir Geoffrey Bindman, QC. Part I. BERNARD QUARITCH LTD MMXX BERNARD QUARITCH LTD 36 Bedford Row, London, WC1R 4JH tel.: +44 (0)20 7297 4888 fax: +44 (0)20 7297 4866 email: [email protected] / [email protected] web: www.quaritch.com Bankers: Barclays Bank PLC 1 Churchill Place London E14 5HP Sort code: 20-65-90 Account number: 10511722 Swift code: BUKBGB22 Sterling account: IBAN: GB71 BUKB 2065 9010 5117 22 Euro account: IBAN: GB03 BUKB 2065 9045 4470 11 U.S. Dollar account: IBAN: GB19 BUKB 2065 9063 9924 44 VAT number: GB 322 4543 31 Front cover: from item 106 (Gillray) Rear cover: from item 281 (Peterloo Massacre) Opposite: from item 276 (‘Martial’) List 2020/1 Introduction My father qualified in medicine at Durham University in 1926 and practised in Gateshead on Tyne for the next 43 years – excluding 6 years absence on war service from 1939 to 1945. From his student days he had been an avid book collector. He formed relationships with antiquarian booksellers throughout the north of England. His interests were eclectic but focused on English literature of the 17th and 18th centuries. Several of my father’s books have survived in the present collection. During childhood I paid little attention to his books but in later years I too became a collector. During the war I was evacuated to the Lake District and my school in Keswick incorporated Greta Hall, where Coleridge lived with Robert Southey and his family. So from an early age the Lake Poets were a significant part of my life and a focus of my book collecting.
  • Scotland's Greatest

    Scotland's Greatest

    SCOTLAND’S GREATEST Revival The Second Reformation in Scotland was not only There were strong bonds of fellowship between the dean who was reading Laud’s liturgy. “Villain!”, a national movement of reform in the Church and those who opposed unbiblical practice. They often she said, “Do you say mass in my lug [ear]?” Nation. It was also a period of intense and sus- met for united prayer. John Livingstone tells us that tained religious revival. It was the greatest period there were “great meltings of heart” among the This led to the signing of the National Covenant by of revival in Scotland’s history for the following people of God at that time. The presence of the the leading figures of Church and Nation at Grey- reasons. Holy Spirit was greatly evident. James Wood was friars Kirkyard in 1638. The movement began with a resolute episcopalian who was converted after “but few, and these not honourable”. Alexander 01 It arose out of prayer attending one such meeting. Henderson believed this showed that it was God’s The Stuart kings imposed unbiblical practices on work. the worship and government of the Church of Scot- There were also notable revivals in Ulster, Kirk of land. This intensified particularly in the years follow- Shotts and Ayrshire. In 1628 there was a solemn fast ing 1618. Those who resisted these changes faced across the land in response to the many reasons “Oh, let the King come! increasing persecution. Church members suffered for humbling themselves before God as a nation. for refusing to receive communion in an idolatrous The Holy Spirit was manifest in great power at that Oh, let His kingdom come!” posture.
  • Protestant Experience and Continuity of Political Thought in Early America, 1630-1789

    Protestant Experience and Continuity of Political Thought in Early America, 1630-1789

    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School July 2020 Protestant Experience and Continuity of Political Thought in Early America, 1630-1789 Stephen Michael Wolfe Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the Political History Commons, Political Theory Commons, Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Wolfe, Stephen Michael, "Protestant Experience and Continuity of Political Thought in Early America, 1630-1789" (2020). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 5344. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/5344 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. PROTESTANT EXPERIENCE AND CONTINUITY OF POLITICAL THOUGHT IN EARLY AMERICA, 1630-1789 A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of Political Science by Stephen Michael Wolfe B.S., United States Military Academy (West Point), 2008 M.A., Louisiana State University, 2016, 2018 August 2020 Acknowledgements I owe my interest in politics to my father, who over the years, beginning when I was young, talked with me for countless hours about American politics, usually while driving to one of our outdoor adventures. He has relentlessly inspired, encouraged, and supported me in my various endeavors, from attending West Point to completing graduate school.
  • Johnston of Warriston

    Johnston of Warriston

    F a m o u s Sc o t s S e r i e s Th e following Volum es are now ready M S ARLYLE H ECT O R . M C HERSO . T HO A C . By C A P N LL N R M Y O L H T SM E T O . A A A SA . By IP AN A N H U GH MI R E T H LE SK . LLE . By W. K I A H K ! T LOR INN Es. JO N NO . By A . AY R ERT U RNS G BR EL SET OUN. OB B . By A I L D O H GE E. T H E BA L A I ST S. By J N DDI RD MER N Pro fe sso H ER KLESS. RICH A CA O . By r SIR MES Y SI MPSON . EV E L T R E S M SO . JA . By B AN Y I P N M R P o fesso . G R E BLA I KIE. T HOMAS CH AL E S. By r r W A D N MES S ELL . E T H LE SK. JA BO W . By W K I A I M L E OL H T SME T O . T OB AS S O L T T . By IP AN A N U G . T O MON D . FLET CHER O F SA LT O N . By . W . R U P Sir GEOR E DO L S. T HE BLACKWOOD G O . By G UG A RM M LEOD OH ELL OO .
  • The Great Seal of the United States of America Design Began 1776 – Design Completed 1782

    The Great Seal of the United States of America Design Began 1776 – Design Completed 1782

    The Great Seal of The United States of America Design Began 1776 – Design Completed 1782 E Pluribus Unum – ‘Out of Constellation – Denotes a new State Many, One’: the union of the Obverse taking its place and rank among other thirteen original states sovereign powers (with thirteen stars) Eagle – Symbol of strength and Chief (upper part of shield) – power and always turned to Represents Congress unifying the the olive branch as preferring original thirteen states peace; clutching our national symbol— ‘E Pluribus Unum’ Pieces – In alternating colors representing the original thirteen Olive Branch – Represents states all joining in one solid peace; Thirteen leaves and compact supporting the Chief Thirteen olives Thirteen Arrows – Power of war Blue – Signifies vigilance, prepared to defend Liberty which perseverance and justice power is vested in Congress White – Signifies purity Escutcheon (shield) – Protecting the and Innocence American Eagle without any other support to hold the shield; America Red – Signifies hardiness ought to rely on its own virtue and valor for the preservation of the union through Congress Reverse (Often referred to as the Spiritual side of the Shield) The Eye of Providence – Alludes Glory – The light of God, the to the many signal interpositions Providence shining on a new nation of God in favor of the based on God-given unalienable American cause rights Annuit Coeptis – ‘He’ (God) has Pyramid – Symbol of strength favored our undertakings and duration Thirteen layers of an unfinished 1776 – The year of America’s
  • Evening Study -- (1649-1660)

    Evening Study -- (1649-1660)

    Reformed Presbyterian Church History: The Commonwealth to the Westminster RPC Restoration of Charles II (1647-1661) September 13, 2009 Monarchy to Commonwealth to Monarchy 1643-1649 Westminster Assembly 1647 The CoS adopted the Westminster Confession of Faith 1648 The Engagement: Scottish nobles agreed to reestablish Charles I. In return, Charles I promised to support the covenants and establish Presbyterianism for 3 years. In July, The CoS General Assembly met to condemn the Engagement. 1648/1649 Charles I was condemned for treason and executed by Oliver Cromwell. Cromwell became the “Protector of the Commonwealth.” His reign between kings was called the Interrregnum. He was a military dictator. He was an independent, and he put an end to the Presbyterian church government in the Church of England. 1649 The “Act of Classes:” excluded “Engagers” from service in either the government or army. This was passed by the Parliament. They would not allow covenant breakers in the government. Scotland was a Christian and Reformed nation; therefore, this religious filter was necessary. Some thought that the Act of Classes was too harsh, and it began a division within the covenanting movement, which ultimately led to the failure of the covenanters. 1650 The “Protectorate:” • After the death of Charles II, Scottish nobles, such as the Marquis of Argyle and James Guthrie, attempted to make Charles II king. They made Charles II publicly renounce Popery and Prelacy, and He had to profess adherence to the Solemn League and Covenant. He lied to Scotland and agreed to these terms. • Oliver Cromwell invaded Scotland and defeated the Scottish army at the Battle of Dunbar.
  • Calvin Theological Seminary Covenant In

    Calvin Theological Seminary Covenant In

    CALVIN THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY COVENANT IN CONFLICT: THE CONTROVERSY OVER THE CHURCH COVENANT BETWEEN SAMUEL RUTHERFORD AND THOMAS HOOKER A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF CALVIN THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY BY SANG HYUCK AHN GRAND RAPIDS, MICHIGAN MAY 2011 CALVIN THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY 3233 Burton SE • Grand Rapids, Michigan. 49546-4301 800388-6034 Jax: 616957-8621 [email protected] www.calvinserninary.edu This dissertation entitled COVENANT IN CONFLICT: THE CONTROVERSY OVER THE CHURCH COVENANT BETWEEN SAMUEL RUTHERFORD AND THOMAS HOOKER written by SANG HYUCK AHN and submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy has been accepted by the faculty of Calvin Theological Seminary upon the recommendation ofthe undersigned readers: Carl R Trueman, Ph.D. David M. Rylaarsda h.D. Date Acting Vice President for Academic Affairs Copyright © 2011 by Sang Hyuck Ahn All rights reserved To my Lord, the Head of the Church Soli Deo Gloria! CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ix ABSTRACT xi CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 1 I. Statement of the Thesis 1 II. Statement of the Problem 2 III. Survey of Scholarship 6 IV. Sources and Outline 10 CHAPTER 2. THE HISTORICAL CONTEXT OF THE RUTHERFORD-HOOKER DISPUTE ABOUT CHURCH COVENANT 15 I. The Church Covenant in New England 15 1. Definitions 15 1) Church Covenant as a Document 15 2) Church Covenant as a Ceremony 20 3) Church Covenant as a Doctrine 22 2. Secondary Scholarship on the Church Covenant 24 II. Thomas Hooker and New England Congregationalism 31 1. A Short Biography 31 2. Thomas Hooker’s Life and His Congregationalism 33 1) The England Period, 1586-1630 33 2) The Holland Period, 1630-1633: Paget, Forbes, and Ames 34 3) The New England Period, 1633-1647 37 III.
  • Restoration, Religion, and Revenge Heather Thornton Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College

    Restoration, Religion, and Revenge Heather Thornton Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College

    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Master's Theses Graduate School 2005 Restoration, religion, and revenge Heather Thornton Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Thornton, Heather, "Restoration, religion, and revenge" (2005). LSU Master's Theses. 558. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses/558 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Master's Theses by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. RESTORATION, RELIGION AND REVENGE A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in The Department of History By Heather D. Thornton B.A., Lousiana State University, 1999 M. Div., Golden Gate Baptist Theological Seminary, 2002 December 2005 In Memory of Laura Fay Thornton, 1937-2003, Who always believed in me ii Acknowledgements I would like to thank many people who both encouraged and supported me in this process. My advisor, Dr. Victor Stater, offered sound criticism and advice throughout the writing process. Dr. Christine Kooi and Dr. Maribel Dietz who served on my committee and offered critical outside readings. I owe thanks to my parents Kevin and Jorenda Thornton who listened without knowing what I was talking about as well as my grandparents Denzil and Jo Cantley for prayers and encouragement.
  • The Percival J. Baldwin Puritan Collection

    The Percival J. Baldwin Puritan Collection

    The Percival J. Baldwin Puritan Collection Accessing the Collection: 1. Anyone wishing to use this collection for research purposes should complete a “Request for Restricted Materials” form which is available at the Circulation desk in the Library. 2. The materials may not be taken from the Library. 3. Only pencils and paper may be used while consulting the collection. 4. Photocopying and tracing of the materials are not permitted. Classification Books are arranged by author, then title. There will usually be four elements in the call number: the name of the collection, a cutter number for the author, a cutter number for the title, and the date. Where there is no author, the cutter will be A0 to indicate this, to keep filing in order. Other irregularities are demonstrated in examples which follow. BldwnA <-- name of collection H683 <-- cutter for author O976 <-- cutter for title 1835 <-- date of publication Example. A book by the author Thomas Boston, 1677-1732, entitled, Human nature in its fourfold state, published in 1812. BldwnA B677 <-- cutter for author H852 <-- cutter for title 1812 <-- date of publication Variations in classification scheme for Baldwin Puritan collection Anonymous works: BldwnA A0 <---- Indicates no author G363 <---- Indicates title 1576 <---- Date Bibles: BldwnA B524 <---- Bible G363 <---- Geneva 1576 <---- Date Biographies: BldwnA H683 <---- cuttered on subject's name Z5 <---- Z5 indicates biography R633Li <---- cuttered on author's name, 1863 then first two letters of title Letters: BldwnA H683 <----- cuttered
  • Dictionary of National Biography

    Dictionary of National Biography

    Blair 160 Blair ' (4to). He casually names a cosen Blague i. 427, ii. 116). He defended Kames, his ' the surgeon' as attending on the wounded.' intimate friend, when Kames's 'Essays on ' their author to a Neve's i. Abbot Wood's Morality exposed charge [Le Fasti, 577 ; Reg. ; of and answer Fasti, ii. 184; Reg. Whitgift, 3, 269; Keg. infidelity, brought Campbell's to Hume's Miracles under the G-rindall et Bancroft, Kennet; "Wood's Fasti, i. essay upon communications from Dean of notice of Hume i. 222, 227 ; present (TYTLER'S Kames, 198, Rochester, rectors of Bangor, Ewelme, Great 266). He was intimate with Henry Dundas, ii. &c. &c. Newcourt's , afterwards Lord and Braxted, ; Repertorium, Melville, through him 91-2.] A. B. G-. had some influence upon Scotch patronage. He declined to use it in order to succeed BLAIR, HUGH (1718-1800), divine, Robertson as principal of the university, but was born in Edinburgh 7 April 1718. His is said to have been annoyed at being passed father, John Blair, was an Edinburgh mer- over in favour of Dr. Baird. Blair encouraged chant, son of Hugh and grandson of Robert MacPherson to publish the 'Fragments of ' Blair, 1593-1666 [q.v.], chaplain to Charles I. Ancient Poetry in 1760, and eulogised their Hugh Blair was educated at Edinburgh, and merits with more zeal than discretion in ' A entered the university in 1730. An essay irepl Critical Dissertation on the Poems of Ossian, rot) KCI\OV, written whilst he was a student, the son of Fingal,' 1763.