Supplementary Lenders Information Package (SLIP) in Complement of Environmental and Social

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Supplementary Lenders Information Package (SLIP) in Complement of Environmental and Social [Double-click to import picture] Supplementary Lenders Information Package (SLIP) in complement of Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Energética I Wind Farm Project (Tornquist, Argentina) 28 June 2019 Project No.: 0511793 The business of sustainability Document details The details entered below are automatically shown on the cover and the main page footer. PLEASE NOTE: This table must NOT be removed from this document. Document title Supplementary Lenders Information Package (SLIP) in complement of Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Document subtitle Energética I Wind Farm Project (Tornquist, Argentina) Project No. 0511793 Date 28 June 2019 Version Final Author ERM Client Name AES ARGENTINA Document history ERM approval to issue Version Revision Author Reviewed by Name Date Comments Final 01 ERM Camille Maclet Leonardo Fantin 28/06/2019 - www.erm.com Version: Final Project No.: 0511793 28 June 2019 Signature Page 28 June 2019 Supplementary Lenders Information Package (SLIP) in complement of Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Energética I Wind Farm Project (Tornquist, Argentina) Camille Maclet Leonardo Fantin Partner Business Unit Managing Partner ERM Argentina S.A. Av. Cabildo 2677, Piso 6º (C1428AAI) 46 Buenos Aires, Argentina © Copyright 2019 by ERM Worldwide Group Ltd and / or its affiliates (“ERM”). All rights reserved. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form, or by any means, without the prior written permission of ERM www.erm.com Version: Final Project No.: 0511793 28 June 2019 SUPPLEMENTARY LENDERS INFORMATION PACKAGE (SLIP) IN CONTENTS COMPLEMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT Energética I Wind Farm Project (Tornquist, Argentina) CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................... 8 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION ...................................................................................................... 12 2. LEGAL & ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK ......................................................................... 15 2.1 Overview of the Legal and Institutional Organization ................................................... 15 2.2 National vs. Provincial Regulatory Setting ................................................................... 16 2.2.1 Environmental and Health and Safety Regulations ....................................... 16 2.3 Authorities .................................................................................................................. 16 2.4 Federal Regulations ................................................................................................... 17 2.4.1 National Constitution .................................................................................... 17 2.4.2 Human Rights .............................................................................................. 17 2.4.3 Environmental Framework Law .................................................................... 18 2.4.4 Other Relevant Environmental Regulations .................................................. 18 2.4.5 Health and Safety Regulations ..................................................................... 20 2.5 Buenos Aires Province Regulations ............................................................................ 20 2.5.1 Renewable Energies Regulations ................................................................ 20 2.5.2 Environmental Impact Assessment and Environmental License ................... 20 2.5.3 Other Environmental Regulations ................................................................ 22 2.6 International Treaties and Agreements ....................................................................... 23 2.7 International Requirements ......................................................................................... 23 2.7.1 FC Guidelines, Standards and Policies ........................................................ 24 2.7.2 World Bank Policies ..................................................................................... 26 2.7.3 Equator Principles ....................................................................................... 28 2.7.4 Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights ..................................... 28 3. PROJECT ALTERNATIVES ................................................................................................... 30 3.1 Overall Project context ............................................................................................... 30 3.2 Site selection .............................................................................................................. 30 3.2.1 Alternative Locations and Design for Wind Turbines..................................... 31 3.3 “No Project” Alternative .............................................................................................. 32 3.4 References ................................................................................................................. 32 4. LAND ACQUISITION ............................................................................................................. 32 4.1 Land Acquisiton Process and Agreement ................................................................... 33 5. AREAS OF INFLUENCE ........................................................................................................ 35 5.1 DIRECT AREA OF INFLUENCE ................................................................................. 36 5.2 INDIRECT AREA OF INFLUENCE ............................................................................. 37 6. BASELINES ........................................................................................................................... 42 6.1 Biodiversity ................................................................................................................. 42 6.1.1 Environmental setting overview.................................................................... 42 6.1.2 Methodology ................................................................................................ 44 6.1.3 Criteria used to select vulnerable species .................................................... 46 6.1.4 Results ........................................................................................................ 47 6.1.5 Habitat of importance ................................................................................... 47 6.1.6 Potentially distributed species ...................................................................... 51 6.2 Socioeconomic Baseline and Stakeholder Mapping .................................................... 60 6.2.1 Introduction ................................................................................................. 60 6.2.2 Governance and Administration ................................................................... 62 6.2.3 Government and Territorial distribution ........................................................ 63 6.2.4 Land Use and Spatial Planning .................................................................... 63 www.erm.com Version: Final Project No.: 0511793 Client: AES ARGENTINA 28 June 2019 Page 1 SUPPLEMENTARY LENDERS INFORMATION PACKAGE (SLIP) IN CONTENTS COMPLEMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT Energética I Wind Farm Project (Tornquist, Argentina) 6.2.5 Population ................................................................................................... 63 6.2.6 Migration ..................................................................................................... 64 6.2.7 Education .................................................................................................... 65 6.2.8 Economics and Livelihoods.......................................................................... 66 6.2.9 Labor Force ................................................................................................. 67 6.2.10 Industrial Sector........................................................................................... 67 6.2.11 Agriculture Sector ........................................................................................ 68 6.2.12 Tourism and Recreation Sector.................................................................... 68 6.2.13 Roads and Transportation Means ................................................................ 71 6.2.14 Poverty in the Study Area ............................................................................ 71 6.2.15 Potential Vulnerable Groups Identified ......................................................... 73 6.3 Sociocultural .............................................................................................................. 73 6.3.1 Religion ....................................................................................................... 73 6.3.2 Indigenous People and Culture .................................................................... 73 6.4 Community Health ...................................................................................................... 75 6.4.1 Public Health Facilities and Personnel ......................................................... 75 6.4.2 Key Community Diseases ............................................................................ 76 6.4.3 Water, Hygiene and Sanitation..................................................................... 76 6.5 Community Safety and Security .................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Diversity and Structure of Bird and Mammal Communities in the Semiarid Chaco Region: Response to Agricultural Practices and Landscape Alterations
    Diversity and structure of bird and mammal communities in the Semiarid Chaco Region: response to agricultural practices and landscape alterations Julieta Decarre March 2015 A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Division of Ecology and Evolution, Department of Life Sciences Imperial College London 2 Imperial College London Department of Life Sciences Diversity and structure of bird and mammal communities in the Semiarid Chaco Region: response to agricultural practices and landscape alterations Supervised by Dr. Chris Carbone Dr. Cristina Banks-Leite Dr. Marcus Rowcliffe Imperial College London Institute of Zoology Zoological Society of London 3 Declaration of Originality I herewith certify that the work presented in this thesis is my own and all else is referenced appropriately. I have used the first-person plural in recognition of my supervisors’ contribution. People who provided less formal advice are named in the acknowledgments. Julieta Decarre 4 Copyright Declaration The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and is made available under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives licence. Researchers are free to copy, distribute or transmit the thesis on the condition that they attribute it, that they do not use it for commercial purposes and that they do not alter, transform or build upon it. For any reuse or redistribution, researchers must make clear to others the licence terms of this work 5 “ …and we wandered for about four hours across the dense forest…Along the path I could see several footprints of wild animals, peccaries, giant anteaters, lions, and the footprint of a tiger, that is the first one I saw.” - Emilio Budin, 19061 I dedicate this thesis To my mother and my father to Virginia, Juan Martin and Alejandro, for being there through space and time 1 Book: “Viajes de Emilio Budin: La Expedición al Chaco, 1906-1907”.
    [Show full text]
  • Lista Roja De Las Aves Del Uruguay 1
    Lista Roja de las Aves del Uruguay 1 Lista Roja de las Aves del Uruguay Una evaluación del estado de conservación de la avifauna nacional con base en los criterios de la Unión Internacional para la Conservación de la Naturaleza. Adrián B. Azpiroz, Laboratorio de Genética de la Conservación, Instituto de Investigaciones Biológicas Clemente Estable, Av. Italia 3318 (CP 11600), Montevideo ([email protected]). Matilde Alfaro, Asociación Averaves & Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de la República, Iguá 4225 (CP 11400), Montevideo ([email protected]). Sebastián Jiménez, Proyecto Albatros y Petreles-Uruguay, Centro de Investigación y Conservación Marina (CICMAR), Avenida Giannattasio Km 30.5. (CP 15008) Canelones, Uruguay; Laboratorio de Recursos Pelágicos, Dirección Nacional de Recursos Acuáticos, Constituyente 1497 (CP 11200), Montevideo ([email protected]). Cita sugerida: Azpiroz, A.B., M. Alfaro y S. Jiménez. 2012. Lista Roja de las Aves del Uruguay. Una evaluación del estado de conservación de la avifauna nacional con base en los criterios de la Unión Internacional para la Conservación de la Naturaleza. Dirección Nacional de Medio Ambiente, Montevideo. Descargo de responsabilidad El contenido de esta publicación es responsabilidad de los autores y no refleja necesariamente las opiniones o políticas de la DINAMA ni de las organizaciones auspiciantes y no comprometen a estas instituciones. Las denominaciones empleadas y la forma en que aparecen los datos no implica de parte de DINAMA, ni de las organizaciones auspiciantes o de los autores, juicio alguno sobre la condición jurídica de países, territorios, ciudades, personas, organizaciones, zonas o de sus autoridades, ni sobre la delimitación de sus fronteras o límites.
    [Show full text]
  • Wild Patagonia & Central Chile
    WILD PATAGONIA & CENTRAL CHILE: PUMAS, PENGUINS, CONDORS & MORE! NOVEMBER 1–18, 2019 Pumas simply rock! This year we enjoyed 9 different cats! Observing the antics of lovely Amber here and her impressive family of four cubs was certainly the highlight in Torres del Paine National Park — Photo: Andrew Whittaker LEADERS: ANDREW WHITTAKER & FERNANDO DIAZ LIST COMPILED BY: ANDREW WHITTAKER VICTOR EMANUEL NATURE TOURS, INC. 2525 WALLINGWOOD DRIVE, SUITE 1003 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78746 WWW.VENTBIRD.COM Sensational, phenomenal, outstanding Chile—no superlatives can ever adequately describe the amazing wildlife spectacles we enjoyed on this year’s tour to this breathtaking and friendly country! Stupendous world-class scenery abounded with a non-stop array of exciting and easy birding, fantastic endemics, and super mega Patagonian specialties. Also, as I promised from day one, everyone fell in love with Chile’s incredible array of large and colorful tapaculos; we enjoyed stellar views of all of the country’s 8 known species. Always enigmatic and confiding, the cute Chucao Tapaculo is in the Top 5 — Photo: Andrew Whittaker However, the icing on the cake of our tour was not birds but our simply amazing Puma encounters. Yet again we had another series of truly fabulous moments, even beating our previous record of 8 Pumas on the last day when I encountered a further 2 young Pumas on our way out of the park, making it an incredible 9 different Pumas! Our Puma sightings take some beating, as they have stood for the last three years at 6, 7, and 8. For sure none of us will ever forget the magical 45 minutes spent observing Amber meeting up with her four 1- year-old cubs as they joyfully greeted her return.
    [Show full text]
  • Grasses Plant List
    Grasses Plant List California Botanical Name Common Name Water Use Native Aristida purpurea purple three-awn Very Low X Arundinaria gigantea cane reed Low Bothriochloa barbinodis cane bluestem Low X Bouteloua curtipendula sideoats grama Low X Bouteloua gracilis, cvs. blue grama Low X Briza media quaking grass Low Calamagrostis x acutiflora cvs., e.g. Karl feather reed grass Low Foerster Cortaderia selloana cvs. pampas grass Low Deschampsia cespitosa, cvs. tufted hairgrass Low X Distichlis spicata (marsh, reveg.) salt grass Very Low X Elymus condensatus, cvs. (Leymus giant wild rye Low X condensatus) Elymus triticoides (Leymus triticoides) creeping wild rye Low X Eragrostis elliottii 'Tallahassee Sunset' Elliott's lovegrass Low Eragrostis spectabilis purple love grass Low Festuca glauca blue fescue Low Festuca idahoensis, cvs. Idaho fescue Low X Festuca mairei Maire's fescue Low Helictotrichon sempervirens, cvs. blue oat grass Low Hordeum brachyantherum Meadow barley Very Low X Koeleria macrantha (cristata) June grass Low X Melica californica oniongrass Very Low X Melica imperfecta coast range onion grass Very Low X Melica torreyana Torrey's melic Very Low X Muhlenbergia capillaris, cvs. hairy awn muhly Low Muhlenbergia dubia pine muhly Low Muhlenbergia filipes purply muhly Low Muhlenbergia lindheimeri Lindheimer muhly Low Muhlenbergia pubescens soft muhly Low Muhlenbergia rigens deer grass Low X Nassella gigantea giant needle grass Low Panicum spp. panic grass Low Panicum virgatum, cvs. switch grass Low Pennisetum alopecuroides, cvs.
    [Show full text]
  • Introductory Grass Identification Workshop University of Houston Coastal Center 23 September 2017
    Broadleaf Woodoats (Chasmanthium latifolia) Introductory Grass Identification Workshop University of Houston Coastal Center 23 September 2017 1 Introduction This 5 hour workshop is an introduction to the identification of grasses using hands- on dissection of diverse species found within the Texas middle Gulf Coast region (although most have a distribution well into the state and beyond). By the allotted time period the student should have acquired enough knowledge to identify most grass species in Texas to at least the genus level. For the sake of brevity grass physiology and reproduction will not be discussed. Materials provided: Dried specimens of grass species for each student to dissect Jewelry loupe 30x pocket glass magnifier Battery-powered, flexible USB light Dissecting tweezer and needle Rigid white paper background Handout: - Grass Plant Morphology - Types of Grass Inflorescences - Taxonomic description and habitat of each dissected species. - Key to all grass species of Texas - References - Glossary Itinerary (subject to change) 0900: Introduction and house keeping 0905: Structure of the course 0910: Identification and use of grass dissection tools 0915- 1145: Basic structure of the grass Identification terms Dissection of grass samples 1145 – 1230: Lunch 1230 - 1345: Field trip of area and collection by each student of one fresh grass species to identify back in the classroom. 1345 - 1400: Conclusion and discussion 2 Grass Structure spikelet pedicel inflorescence rachis culm collar internode ------ leaf blade leaf sheath node crown fibrous roots 3 Grass shoot. The above ground structure of the grass. Root. The below ground portion of the main axis of the grass, without leaves, nodes or internodes, and absorbing water and nutrients from the soil.
    [Show full text]
  • Richness of Plants, Birds and Mammals Under the Canopy of Ramorinoa Girolae, an Endemic and Vulnerable Desert Tree Species
    BOSQUE 38(2): 307-316, 2017 DOI: 10.4067/S0717-92002017000200008 Richness of plants, birds and mammals under the canopy of Ramorinoa girolae, an endemic and vulnerable desert tree species Riqueza de plantas, aves y mamíferos bajo el dosel de Ramorinoa girolae, una especie arbórea endémica y vulnerable del desierto Valeria E Campos a,b*, Viviana Fernández Maldonado a,b*, Patricia Balmaceda a, Stella Giannoni a,b,c a Interacciones Biológicas del Desierto (INTERBIODES), Av. I. de la Roza 590 (O), J5402DCS Rivadavia, San Juan, Argentina. *Corresponding author: b CIGEOBIO, UNSJ CONICET, Universidad Nacional de San Juan- CUIM, Av. I. de la Roza 590 (O), J5402DCS Rivadavia, San Juan, Argentina, phone 0054-0264-4260353 int. 402, [email protected], [email protected] c IMCN, FCEFN, Universidad Nacional de San Juan- España 400 (N), 5400 Capital, San Juan, Argentina. SUMMARY Dominant woody vegetation in arid ecosystems supports different species of plants and animals largely dependent on the existence of these habitats for their survival. The chica (Ramorinoa girolae) is a woody leguminous tree endemic to central-western Argentina and categorized as vulnerable. We evaluated 1) richness of plants, birds and mammals associated with the habitat under its canopy, 2) whether richness is related to the morphological attributes and to the features of the habitat under its canopy, and 3) behavior displayed by birds and mammals. We recorded presence/absence of plants under the canopy of 19 trees in Ischigualasto Provincial Park. Moreover, we recorded abundance of birds and mammals and signs of mammal activity using camera traps.
    [Show full text]
  • First Record of the Austral Negrito (Aves: Passeriformes) from the South Shetlands, Antarctica
    vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 297–304, 2015 doi: 10.1515/popore−2015−0018 First record of the Austral Negrito (Aves: Passeriformes) from the South Shetlands, Antarctica Piotr GRYZ 1,2, Małgorzata KORCZAK−ABSHIRE 1* and Alina GERLÉE 3 1 Zakład Biologii Antarktyki, Instytut Biochemii i Biofizyki PAN, ul. Pawińskiego 5a, 02−106 Warszawa, Poland *corresponding author <[email protected]> 2 Instytut Paleobiologii PAN, ul. Twarda 51/55, 00−818 Warszawa, Poland <[email protected]> 3 Zakład Geoekologii, Wydział Geografii i Studiów Regionalnych, Uniwersytet Warszawski, ul. Krakowskie Przedmieście 30, 00−927 Warszawa, Poland <[email protected]> Abstract: The order Passeriformes is the most successful group of birds on Earth, however, its representatives are rare visitors beyond the Polar Front zone. Here we report a photo− −documented record of an Austral Negrito (Lessonia rufa), first known occurrence of this species in the South Shetland Islands and only the second such an observation in the Antarc− tic region. This record was made at Lions Rump, King George Island, part of the Antarctic Specially Protected Area No. 151 (ASPA 151). There is no direct evidence of how the indi− vidual arrived at Lions Rump, but ship assistance cannot be excluded. Key words: Antarctica, King George Island, avifauna monitoring, Lessonia rufa, vagrant birds. Introduction Monitoring of the avifauna in Admiralty and King George Bays on King George Island (South Shetland Islands, Antarctica; Fig. 1) is an important part of the Polish Antarctic research, and has been conducted since 1977 (Jabłoński 1986; Trivelpiece et al. 1987; Sierakowski 1991; Lesiński 1993; Korczak−Abshire et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Adaptations for Food-Getting in the American Blackbirds
    THE AUK A QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ORNITHOLOGY VOL. 68 OCTOBER,1951 No. 4 ADAPTATIONS FOR FOOD-GETTING IN THE AMERICAN BLACKBIRDS BY WILLIAM J. BEECI-IER A careful study of the American blackbird family (Icteridae) during the past severalyears revealsthat its membershave invaded virtually every food niche exploitedby passerinebirds. The presentinvestiga- tion of the functional modificationsof skull, bill, and jaw musculature in the 38 generasuggests that this successstems initially from a general pre-adaptation permitting an entirely new method of feeding. This paper describesfirst the individual feeding adaptations, then their convergent re-appearancein each of the three major icterid lines. Although the graphic comparisonof the genera is presented in the form of a morphologicaltree of relationshipsin Figures 7 to 10, the full evidencefor these relationshipsis not offered here. The present paper confinesitself rather strictly to the nature of the adaptations themselves. METHODS AND MATERIAL Primarily, the method of investigation has been one of attempting to establish valid correlations between skull structure and known feeding functionsin the various genera. The diet of North American specieswas determined from the stomach analyses made by the Bio- logical Survey under suchmen as Judd, Beal, and McAtee (1900-1910). For Central and South American speciesthe field notes of Wetmore (1916, 1926), Wetmore and Swales (1931), and a few other careful observerswere invaluable. Functionally, the method of feedingis of even greater importance than the kind of food taken, and very close observation of birds in field and captivity has been necessary. I am deeply indebted to its designer,Mr. Victor Carbonara, for the use of a Sard 6x 20 binocular, invaluable at ranges down to four feet.
    [Show full text]
  • Museum Receives National Medal, Accreditation 2014 Volunteer of the Year in the Footsteps of Dinosaurs What's in a Name? Hungr
    TracksSummer 2014 Newsletter Vol. 26, No. 2 IN THIS ISSUE Museum Receives National Medal, Accreditation 2014 Volunteer of the Year In the Footsteps of Dinosaurs What’s in a Name? Hungry Planet: What the World Eats Formed in Stone: The Natural Beauty of Fossils TRACKS, SPRING 2014: VOLUME 26 NO. 1 MUSEUM INFORMATION OUR MISSION TRACKS The Sam Noble Museum at the Editor-in-Chief: Michael A. Mares Address University of Oklahoma inspires Managing Editor: Pam McIntosh Sam Noble Museum minds to understand the world Associate Editor: Jen Tregarthen The University of Oklahoma through collection-based research, Layout: Jen Tregarthen 2401 Chautauqua Ave. interpretation and education. Norman, OK 73072-7029 This publication is printed on paper OUR VISION containing 30% post consumer recycled Telephone: (405) 325-4712 As one of the finest museums, we are at fiber. Please recycle. Email: [email protected] the heart of our community, collectively This publication, printed by the Sam Noble Museum, Web: www.SamNobleMuseum.org working to inspire understanding, is issued by the University of Oklahoma. 1,500 copies appreciation and stewardship of have been prepared and distributed at a cost of $2,381 the earth and its peoples. to the taxpayers of the state of Oklahoma. The University of Oklahoma in compliance with all applicable federal and state laws and regulations does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, sexual orientation, genetic information, sex, age, religion, disability, political beliefs, or status as a veteran in any of its policies, practices or procedures. This includes but is not limited to admissions, employment, financial aid and educational services.
    [Show full text]
  • Bat Rabies and Other Lyssavirus Infections
    Prepared by the USGS National Wildlife Health Center Bat Rabies and Other Lyssavirus Infections Circular 1329 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Front cover photo (D.G. Constantine) A Townsend’s big-eared bat. Bat Rabies and Other Lyssavirus Infections By Denny G. Constantine Edited by David S. Blehert Circular 1329 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Suzette M. Kimball, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2009 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Constantine, D.G., 2009, Bat rabies and other lyssavirus infections: Reston, Va., U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1329, 68 p. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Constantine, Denny G., 1925– Bat rabies and other lyssavirus infections / by Denny G. Constantine. p. cm. - - (Geological circular ; 1329) ISBN 978–1–4113–2259–2 1.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Nicaragua Mammal Report
    Nicaragua Mammal Extravaganza, Feb 4-17, 2015 Led by Fiona Reid and Jose Gabriel Martinez, with Mike Richardson and Paul Carter. Photos by Fiona except where noted. Feb 04, Laguna del Apoyo (LA) Our trip officially started on Feb 5, but we all landed a day early, with Paul arriving in the late morning. I asked Jose to see if he could get some help setting up nets and still find time to collect me and Mike from the airport at 9 p.m. We met up with Paul and two friends of Jose’s at a location near our hotel on the Laguna just after 10 p.m. They had caught 7 species of bats, including Common Vampire and Central American Yellow Bat. Of note Paul had also seen 3 Southern Spotted Skunks, a Vesper Rat, Common Opossum and a Central Southern Spotted Skunk (Paul Carter) American Woolly Opossum (last of which obligingly stayed around for me and Mike). We were off to a great start! Feb 05, Apoyo and Montibelli (MB) We spent the morning at Apoyo, where Mantled Howlers and Variegated Squirrel are easily seen. In the afternoon we went to Montibelli Private Reserve. We located roosting Lesser White-lined Bats on a tree trunk and some Jamaican Fruit-eating Bats hidden in leaves of a Dracaena plant (we caught both these species later too). After seeing a Jamaican Fruit-eating Bat, good variety of dry forest birds stained yellow with pollen and our first Central American Agouti, we set up a few nets and caught Greater and Pale Spear-nosed Bats along with various other common species (see list).
    [Show full text]
  • Breeding Biology of the White-Winged Nightjar (Eleothreptus Candicans) in Eastern Paraguay
    Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia, 22(2), 219-233 ARTICLE June 2014 Breeding biology of the White-winged Nightjar (Eleothreptus candicans) in eastern Paraguay Robert G. Pople Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EJ, UK. Email: [email protected] Current address: BirdLife International, Wellbrook Court, Girton Road, Cambridge, CB3 0NA, UK. Received on 03 September 2013. Accepted on 02 October 2013. ABSTRACT: Breeding biology of the White-winged Nightjar (Eleothreptus candicans) in eastern Paraguay. I present the first detailed description of the breeding biology of the White-winged Nightjar (Eleothreptus candicans), based on data collected over three breeding seasons during 1998-2001 at Aguará Ñu, Canindeyú, eastern Paraguay. Male nightjars defended small territories situated on the upper slopes of ridgelines. Each territory contained one or more “display arenas” at which the male performed nuptial display flights. Aggregation indices confirmed that the primary display arenas of males were significantly clustered within the survey area. Within their territories, males apparently selected display arenas on the basis of their structural characteristics: mounds used as arenas were significantly lower and broader than random mounds. Males engaged in display activity from late August to early January. On average, males performed 0.54 ± 0.04 display flights per minute during nocturnal focal watches, but there was considerable intra-male variation in display rate. Following a burst of activity immediately after their arrival at display arenas at dusk, male display rate was best explained by ambient levels of moonlight. Males produced a previously undescribed insect-like “tik tik” call when inactive on their territories.
    [Show full text]