DOCSLIB.ORG

Sip-SPRING-2020.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sip-SPRING-2020.Pdf SCIENCE IN PARLIAMENT The Journal of the Parliamentary and Scientific Committee – All-Party Parliamentary SPRING 2020 Group sip This is not an official publication of the House of Commons or the House of Lords. It has not been approved by either House or its THE POWER OF Committees. All-Party Groups are informal groups of members of both Houses with a common interest in INNOVATION particular issues. The views expressed in this Journal are those of the Group. This Journal is funded by the members of the Parliamentary and Scientific Committee (All-Party Parliamentary Group). CAN... STEM FOR BRITAIN 2020 SEE SPECIAL FEATURE ON PAGES 24-37 WINNERS ALL! Mathematical Sciences and Physical Sciences (Chemistry and Physics) Exhibitions Florence Gregson (Gold, Chemistry); Gemma Smith (Bronze, Chemistry); Fabienne Bachtiger (Silver, Chemistry); Damian Galante (Bronze, Maths); Maeve Madigan (Bronze, Physics); Luisa Mihaela Paun (Gold, Maths); Graham Bruce (Silver, Physics); Adrien Lefauve (Silver, Maths); Lui Terry (Gold, Physics), joined at the back by Stephen Metcalfe MP, Chairman, STEM for Britain and Dr Stephen Benn, Vice-President, Parliamentary & Scientific Committee, Biomedical and Biological Sciences and Engineering Exhibitions Sarah Houston (Gold, Biosciences and Westminster Medal Winner); Karolina Tuomela (Silver, Biosciences); Benjamin Fletcher (IEEE Communications Society Prize, Engineering); Ted Roberts (Bronze, Biosciences); Benjamin Cerfontaine (Bronze, Engineering); Stephen Metcalfe MP, Chairman, STEM for Britain; Tomas Ysehak Abay (Gold, Engineering); Dr Stephen Benn, Vice-President, Parliamentary & Scientific Committee; Elisa Roccia (Silver, Engineering); Egzona Morina (The Physiological Society Prize, Biosciences); Andres Rivero Bracho (The Dyson Award); and George Firth (The Nutrition Society Prize, Biosciences) aspects of the COVID-19 crisis As ever, STEM for Britain would that we will need to think not have been possible without SCIENCE IN PARLIAMENT through and learn from. the help of all the major Learned As we look forward we can take Societies involved in its heart from the fact that the organisation, and those who public and Parliamentary generously supported the event appreciation of science and including the Clay Mathematics technology has grown greatly Institute, Warwick Manufacturing sip over these past difficult weeks Group, UK Research and Innovation, Dyson Ltd, and we should take the The Journal of the Parliamentary and opportunity to breathe new life Biotherapy Services Ltd, the Scientific Committee (All-Party Parliamentary Group). Stephen Metcalfe MP into the work and activity of the Institute of Biomedical Science, Chairman, Parliamentary & Scientific P&SC. the Heilbronn Institute for Committee (All-Party Parliamentary Mathematical Research, The Group) If there is one lesson we can all Physiological Society, the agree on it is that science and Nutrition Society, the Biochemical technology has never been more Society, IEEE Communications vital to the life of the country and Society, the Comino Foundation Welcome to Spring 2020 the planet. and the Society for Chemical edition of Science in It seems quite some time ago Industry. I thank them all, Parliament now, but on the 9th March I was together with the competition It is a matter of great frustration delighted to once again host Judges and the STEM Organising that at the very time when STEM for Britain and welcome Team. Parliament is most interested in early career researchers from In addition to our feature on – and most needs – access to universities and research STEM for Britain, we have a scientific expertise, advice and institutions from around the Science in Parliament has two main wonderful series of articles for objectives: discussion the Coronavirus Crisis country to Westminster. This you in this issue, and I am very 1. to inform the scientific and has closed down normal annual competition is an grateful to each of our industrial communities of activities Parliamentary life and hence important date in the distinguished contributors for within Parliament of a scientific parliamentary calendar as it gives nature and of the progress of prevented the Parliamentary & sparing the time, particularly in relevant legislation; MPs an opportunity to speak Scientific Committee from the current situation, to bring us 2. to keep Members of Parliament meeting. directly to a wide range of the the benefit of their expertise and abreast of scientific affairs. UK’s best young researchers. This is a matter of great regret to experience on a variety of topics, These early career engineers, including COVID-19, smart me as Chair not least because mathematicians and scientists energy, acoustics, mathematical our recent meetings over the are the architects of our future data, cancer research, and past few months have been and STEM for Britain is the best innovation. packed to the hilt and we have opportunity for politicians meet had some excellent them and understand their work. Stay safe and well. presentations and discussions. I am pleased to say that over 70 We have many more planned – parliamentary colleagues were and that will undoubtedly feature present at this year’s event. CONTENTS The Journal of the Parliamentary and Scientific Committee (All-Party Parliamentary Group). CORONAVIRUS 2 UNLOCKING A MORE SUSTAINABLE FUTURE PARLIAMENTARY OFFICE OF Professor Arne Akbar WITH AI 14 SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (POST) 41 Maria McKavanagh THE POWER OF INNOVATION CAN… 4 HOUSE OF COMMONS SELECT COMMITTEES 42 Professor Sa’ad Sam Medhat CAN THE OFFSHORE ENERGY SECTOR BE TRANSFORMED TO HELP THE UK BECOME A HOUSE OF COMMONS LIBRARY 43 SCIENCE IS CHALLENGING CANCER USING THE NET-ZERO NATION? 16 SCIENCE DIRECTORY 44 UK’S SYNCHROTRON 6 Gioia Falcone Lorna Campbell SCIENCE DIARY 53 THE SKILLS GAP – RECRUITMENT INTO THE MATHEMATICS, NUMBERS AND DATA IN DAILY ACOUSTICAL ENGINEERING INDUSTRY 21 LIFE: A HIDDEN CRISIS AT THE BASE OF THE Professor Chris Barlow PYRAMID 9 Professor Chris Linton STEM FOR BRITAIN 2020 24 SMART ENERGY: THINKING ABOUT OUTCOMES, NOISE, SOUND AND ACOUSTICS DIGITAL INFRASTRUCTURE, AND PEOPLE 11 AN OVERVIEW AND CURRENT POLICY Rebecca Ford CHALLENGES 38 Stephen Turner Science in Parliament | Vol 76 No 1 | Spring 2020 1 CORONAVIRUS It is impossible today to be unaware of the Coronavirus pandemic that has swept across the world since the beginning of 2020. Just over one hundred years on from the ‘Spanish flu’ of 1918-1920, the world faces similar challenges from the COVID-19 disease at a time when we enjoy much more advanced medical treatments and practices but have also enabled the spread of the disease through greater global connectivity. SARS-CoV-2 is the virus that samples from hospitalised disease, preventing its causes the disease, COVID-19. patients were analysed at the transmission through that Professor Arne Akbar The coronavirus family includes Wuhan Institute of Virology population. This can be achieved President of the British Society for Immunology and Professor of a number of viruses which cause where the virus was later either through vaccination or Immunology at UCL a range of illnesses from the isolated and identified as a novel when enough people in the common cold to the Severe coronavirus. China officially population have built up Acute Respiratory Syndrome notified the WHO of cases of antibodies by fighting the (SARS) epidemic in 2002. There pneumonia with an unknown pathogen directly. However, this are also hundreds of other aetiology on 31 December. latter strategy only works to strains of Coronaviruses which reduce serious disease if, when Spread of the virus has been infect non-human species, building that immunity, rapid. The first COVID-19 case notably bats. Like humans, bats vulnerable individuals are outside China was announced in live in close quarters, so easily protected from contracting the South Korea on 8 January. By 31 spread pathogens between each virus. If not, the consequences January, the first UK case was other, and as humans begin to could be severe. As SARS-CoV-2 confirmed. Four weeks later, on encroach on their habitats, this is a novel virus in humans, it is makes cross-species 28 February, we documented not yet known how long the transmission a particular risk. the first case of infection immunity built up would last for. Whilst the genetic makeup of transmitted within the UK; all Some other viruses in the SARS-CoV-2 points towards the previous cases had been Coronavirus family that cause original virus being bat-borne, infected abroad. Within one common colds build immunity evidence suggests that it may month, there had been over that only lasts for a few months, have been transmitted to 22,000 cases and 1,408 deaths but this may be related to their 2 humans via an intermediate in the UK . During this time, co-evolution with the human species 1. In 2016, following the other regional epicentres of immune system. Given the Ebola epidemic, the World disease have emerged, uncertainty of the characteristics Health Organization (WHO) noticeably Italy, Spain and the of this novel virus and how it identified the SARSr-COV virus USA. In mid-March, the UK would interact with the human family as having potential for a Government began to shepherd immune system, the current future epidemic and the largest expansion of state strategy which will allow herd recommended research into power outside of wartime immunity to be built up slowly diagnostic tests, vaccines and through Parliament, legislating to together with avoiding exposure medicines. restrict the movement of the UK of overly vulnerable parts of the population and ensure they population, such as the elderly The origin of the novel remained at home except for or the immunocompromised, is Coronavirus is Wuhan in China, essential work, exercise, or to be welcomed. with a population of over 11 shopping for food or medicine. million people. The first This new strategy includes a confirmed case was recorded on This came as the Government ‘delay’ phase to slow the spread 1 December 2019, but it is moved away from a policy of of COVID-19 after containment speculated that the real first case building herd immunity.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Forensic Science and Beyond: Authenticity, Provenance and Assurance
    Edinburgh Research Explorer ‘Notions of purity Citation for published version: Bray, F 2015, '‘Notions of purity: an anthropological perspective’' Annual Report of the Government Chief Scientific Adviser 2015. Forensic Science and Beyond: Authenticity, Provenance and Assurance. , pp. 120- 122. <https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/forensic-science-and-beyond> Link: Link to publication record in Edinburgh Research Explorer Document Version: Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Published In: Annual Report of the Government Chief Scientific Adviser 2015. Forensic Science and Beyond: Authenticity, Provenance and Assurance. Publisher Rights Statement: Open Government Licence v3.0 General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Edinburgh Research Explorer is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The University of Edinburgh has made every reasonable effort to ensure that Edinburgh Research Explorer content complies with UK legislation. If you believe that the public display of this file breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 04. Oct. 2021 FORENSIC SCIENCE AND BEYOND: AUTHENTICITY, PROVENANCE AND ASSURANCE EVIDENCE AND CASE STUDIES l l l l l l l Annual Report of the Government Chief Scientific Adviser 2015 Forensic Science and Beyond: Authenticity, Provenance and Assurance Evidence and Case Studies This volume comprises chapters which form the evidence for the Government Chief Scientific Adviser’s Annual Report 2015, together with illustrative case studies.
    [Show full text]
  • A Short History of the Royal Aeronautical Society
    A SHORT HISTORY OF THE ROYAL AERONAUTICAL SOCIETY Royal Aeronautical Society Council Dinner at the Science Museum on 26 May 1932 with Guest of Honour Miss Amelia Earhart. Edited by Chris Male MRAeS Royal Aeronautical Society www.aerosociety.com Afterburner Society News RAeS 150th ANNIVERSARY www.aerosociety.com/150 The Royal Aeronautical Society: Part 1 – The early years The Beginning “At a meeting held at Argyll Lodge, Campden Hill, Right: The first Aeronautical on 12 January 1866, His Grace The Duke of Argyll Exhibition, Crystal Palace, 1868, showing the presiding; also present Mr James Glaisher, Dr Hugh Stringfellow Triplane model W. Diamond, Mr F.H. Wenham, Mr James Wm. Butler and other exhibits. No fewer and Mr F.W. Brearey. Mr Glaisher read the following than 77 exhibits were address: collected together, including ‘The first application of the Balloon as a means of engines, lighter- and heavier- than-air models, kites and ascending into the upper regions of the plans of projected machines. atmosphere has been almost within the recollection A special Juror’s Report on on ‘Aerial locomotion and the laws by which heavy of men now living but with the exception of some the exhibits was issued. bodies impelled through air are sustained’. of the early experimenters it has scarcely occupied Below: Frederick W Brearey, Wenham’s lecture is now one of the aeronautical Secretary of the the attention of scientific men, nor has the subject of Aeronautical Society of Great classics and was the beginning of the pattern of aeronautics been properly recognised as a distinct Britain, 1866-1896.
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence Synthesis on the EU-UK Relationship on Research and Innovation January 2018
    Evidence synthesis on the EU-UK relationship on research and innovation January 2018 1. Introduction The Royal Society and the Wellcome Trust have undertaken a rapid evidence synthesis on the EU-UK research and innovation relationship as part of their Future Partnership Project. Organisations and individuals were invited to submit evidence and analyses for inclusion. Evidence was also gathered through internet searches to ensure an inclusive approach. The Annex is a summary of the methods. Two questions were used in gathering evidence and in determining the material in scope: 1. What incentives, infrastructure and mechanisms can be accessed by research and innovation organisations, funders and individuals in Member States to support collaborations? 2. How do Member States currently use and benefit from these and how might they be affected by Brexit? This paper is a synthesis of the evidence and covers funding, infrastructures, mobility, collaboration and regulation, with a focus on links between the EU and the UK. 2. Overview of the evidence base A few major reports were of particular relevance; the Royal Society’s three reports on the role of the EU in UK research and innovation and two reports commissioned from Technopolis Group by UK organisations, on the role of EU funding in UK research and innovation and the impact of collaboration: the value of UK medical research to EU science and health1,2. These documents were often referenced in other submissions. A report from the Lords Science and Technology Committee’s inquiry on EU Membership and UK Science also summarises many sources of evidence relevant to this synthesis.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Acronyms Engineers SOE Society of Operations Engineers Licensed Members TWI the Welding Institute BCS the Chartered Institute for IT
    SEE Society of Environmental Common Acronyms Engineers SOE Society of Operations Engineers Licensed Members TWI The Welding Institute BCS The Chartered Institute for IT BINDT British Institute of Non-Destructive Testing Professional Affiliates CIBSE Chartered Institution of Building ACostE Association of Cost Engineers Services Engineers APM Association for Project CIHT Chartered Institution of Highways Management and Transportation CABE Chartered Association of Building CIPHE Chartered Institute of Plumbing and Engineers Heating Engineering CQI Chartered Quality Institute CIWEM Chartered Institution of Water and IAEA Institute of Automotive Engineer Environmental Management Assessors EI Energy Institute IAT Institute of Asphalt Technology IAgrE Institution of Agricultural Engineers ICES Chartered Institution of Civil ICE Institution of Civil Engineers Engineering Surveyors IChemE Institution of Chemical Engineers ICorr Institute of Corrosion ICME Institute of Cast Metals Engineers ICT Institute of Concrete Technology IED Institution of Engineering IDE Institute of Demolition Engineers Designers IDGTE Institution of Diesel and Gas IET Institution of Engineering and Turbine Engineers Technology IExpE Institute of Explosives Engineers IFE Institution of Fire Engineers IMA Institute of Mathematics and its IGEM Institution of Gas Engineers and Applications Managers IMF Institute of Materials Finishing IHE Institute of Highway Engineers INCOSE UK International Council on Systems Engineering (UK Chapter) IHEEM Institute of Healthcare Engineering
    [Show full text]
  • Wellcome Trust Annual Report and Financial Statements 2018 Is © the Wellcome Trust and Is Licensed Under Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 UK
    Annual Report and Financial Statements 2018 Table of contents Report from Chair 3 Report from Director 4 Trustee’s Report 5 What we do 6 Review of Charitable Activities 7 Review of Investment Activities 18 Financial Review 28 Structure and Governance 33 Social Responsibility 38 Risk Management 40 Remuneration Report 42 Nomination Committee Report 44 Remuneration Committee Report 45 Investment Committee Report 46 Audit and Risk Committee Report 47 Independent Auditor’s Report 49 Financial Statements 59 Consolidated Statement of Financial Activities 60 Consolidated Balance Sheet 61 Statement of Financial Activities of the Trust 62 Balance Sheet of the Trust 63 Consolidated Cash Flow Statement 64 Notes to the Financial Statements 65 Reference and Administrative Details 116 2 Table of Contents Wellcome Trust Annual Report 2018 Report from Chair In March 2018, the Board of Governors and I year, driven by the performance of the investment decided to reappoint Jeremy Farrar as Director portfolio, which returned 13.4%, or 10.7% after of Wellcome for a further five years. Under his inflation. This year has seen a return of market leadership, Wellcome is ambitious, innovative and volatility as the economic cycle has matured. willing to take risks in pursuit of our mission of Central Banks, led by the US Federal Reserve, have improving health by helping great ideas to thrive. begun to raise interest rates and remove the prop to Wellcome’s work is underpinned by the financial asset prices previously provided by quantitative strength we derive from our £25.9 billion investment easing. Uncertainties about Brexit have generated portfolio.
    [Show full text]
  • Royal Society, 1985
    The Public Understanding of Science Report of a Royal Society adhoc Group endorsed by the Council of the Royal Society The Royal Society 6 Carlton House Terrace London SWlY 5AG CONTENTS Page Preface 5 Summary 6 1. Introduction 7 2. Why it matters 9 3. The present position 12 4. Formal education 17 5. The mass media 2 1 6. ' The scientific community 24 7. Public lectures, children's activities, museums and libraries 27 8. Industry 29 9. Conclusions and recommendations 31 Annexes A. List of those submitting evidence B. Visits and seminars C. Selected bibliography PREFACE This report was prepared by an ad hoc group under the chairmanship of Dr W.F. Bodmer, F.R.S.; it has been endorsed by the Council of the Royal Society. It deals with an issue that is important not only, or even mainly, for the scientific community but also for the nation as a whole and for each individual within it. More than ever, people need some understanding of science, whether they are involved in decision-making at a national or local level, in managing industrial companies, in skilled or semi-skilled employment, in voting as private citizens or in making a wide range of personal decisions. In publishing this report the Council hopes that it will highlight this need for an overall awareness of the nature of science and, more particularly, of the way that science and technology pervade modern life, and that it will generate both debate and decisions on how best they can be fostered. The report makes a number of recommendations.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidance for Applicants
    Guidance for applicants The British Academy, Royal Academy of Engineering and A full list of the disciplines covered by the Academies can the Royal Society are three of five Designated Competent be found in the ‘Guidance on Policy for UK visas under Tier Bodies (DCBs) appointed by the Home Office to assess 1 (Exceptional Talent)’ document available on the Home applications for the Research and Innovation Talent Visa Office website. under the Home Office Tier 1 (Exceptional Talent) Visa route. Holders of a Research and Innovation Talent Visa that were As DCBs, the Academies are responsible for considering endorsed through Exceptional Talent are eligible to apply whether an individual who makes an application for settlement (Indefinite Leave to Remain) after three years. is demonstrably ‘exceptionally talented’ or has Holders endorsed through Exceptional Promise are eligible ‘exceptional promise’. after five years. Tier 1 (Exceptional Talent) is subject to a limit of 2,000 visas per year (beginning on 6 April one year and ending on 5 April the following year). The Academies assess applications in the following areas and are allocated a minumum number of endorsements by the Home Office from the total annual pool. • The British Academy – for humanities and social sciences (150 endorsements); • The Royal Society – for natural sciences and medical science research (250 endorsements); • The Royal Academy of Engineering – for engineering (150 endorsements). TIER 1 APPLICATION GUIDANCE 1 Overview of the application process The application for a Research & Innovation Talent visa Should the decision be upheld then the process ends here. (Tier 1 Exceptional Talent) is in two stages: You can still apply via another visa route or re-apply to this route with revised supporting evidence.
    [Show full text]
  • Uk Plant Science Research Strategy a Green Roadmap for the Next Ten Years Contents
    UK PLANT SCIENCE RESEARCH STRATEGY A GREEN ROADMAP FOR THE NEXT TEN YEARS CONTENTS Foreword . 1 Introduction . 3 Context . 4 Deliverables . .5 1 Securing. a Pipeline of Transformative Discoveries . 5 2 Strategic. Research to Solve Grand Challenges . .8 3 Innovation. 11 4 Diverse. People and Skills . .18 5 National. Infrastructure . 20 6 International. Landscape . .21 List of Recommendations . 23 Appendix 1: List of people consulted . .25 FOREWORD In many ways the idea of a national strategy I also held a workshop with twenty independent is counterintuitive – science is global and research fellows . I am extremely grateful to more than ever we need to be working across everyone who gave their time and thoughtful national boundaries to solve the enormous input during a very challenging period of environmental and societal challenges that we national lockdown . The issues we discussed face . However, to collaborate more effectively in revolved around what plant science research the international arena we first need increased can and should contribute to society, and what investment and better co-ordination across the mechanisms are needed to ensure effective UK . In April 2020, following discussions with delivery of those contributions . After the colleagues, I proposed a community-driven consultation, I distilled many pages of informal approach to develop a plant science research notes into a two page summary of the core strategy for the UK . I engaged with no personal messages that would underpin the strategy . In or professional agenda, no vested interest and the second phase, this summary was circulated an open mind1 . Melanie Welham, Executive to all consultees, with a request to consult more Chair of the UK Biotechnology and Biological widely within their local constituency and to Sciences Research Council (BBSRC), part feedback any further comments .
    [Show full text]
  • Chemistry for All Reducing Inequalities in Chemistry Aspirations and Attitudes
    Chemistry for All Reducing inequalities in chemistry aspirations and attitudes Institute of Education 2 Chemistry for All Reducing inequalities in chemistry aspirations and attitudes Findings from the Chemistry for All research and evaluation programme November 2020 Authors Dr Tamjid Mujtaba Dr Richard Sheldrake Professor Michael J. Reiss UCL Institute of Education, University College London Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank the students and staff from across the participating schools. The authors would also like to thank the Chemistry for All programme delivery teams and members of the programme steering group. The research was conducted independently by the UCL Institute of Education with funding from the Royal Society of Chemistry. For further information For further information on the Chemistry for All project, including requests for related publications or the next phase of the work, please contact Dr Tamjid Mujtaba ([email protected]). 3 1. Executive summary 5 9.3. Results for science as of Year 11 82 1.1. Background and context 6 9.3.1. Predicting students’ science aspirations 1.2. Chemistry for All programme 7 (A-Level, university, jobs) as of Year 11 82 1.3. Research and evaluation programme 7 9.3.2. Predicting students’ science aspirations for A-Level as of Year 11 85 CONTENTS 1.4. Research results and insights 8 1.4.1. Insights into students’ changing attitudes and aspirations 8 9.3.3. Predicting students’ science aspirations for careers as of Year 11 86 1.4.2. Insights into students’ attitudes and views 9 9.3.4. Predicting students’ science aspirations for university 1.4.3.
    [Show full text]
  • Quadram Institute Newsletter
    Autumn 2019 Welcome to the newsle�er of the Quadram Ins�tute. This issue highlights recent research breakthroughs at the We con�nue to build our team and are pleased to welcome Quadram Ins�tute (QI) that could have posi�ve impacts on Professor Cynthia Whitchurch to the QI. Cynthia is se�ng public health. Working with clinicians our researchers have up a research group inves�ga�ng bacterial lifestyles, and shown how the latest sequencing technologies can aid in how these make them more infec�ous or resistant to diagnos�cs and surveillance. Coupling these techniques an�microbials. Cynthia joins us from the ithree ins�tute at with ‘Big Data’ analy�cal approaches will be vital to the University of Technology Sydney. Her research led to addressing 21st century popula�on health challenges, and the discovery that extracellular DNA is required for biofilm the QI aims to be a leader in this area. development. Big Data in the NHS was the topic of a roundtable We con�nue to welcome visitors to our new building to discussion I a�ended with Patricia Hart at the policy share our vision to understand how food and microbes development think tank Reform. This roundtable was interact to promote health and prevent disease. In June, we sponsored by QI and explored how universi�es and industry had the honour of hos�ng His Excellency Simon Smits, can work with government to realise poten�al applica�ons Ambassador of the Netherlands to the UK. The Ambassador of Big Data. The event was chaired by Baroness Blackwood, visited the Norwich Research Park as part of an Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department of interna�onal trade delega�on to East Anglia to learn about Health and Social Care (DHSC) and included senior the region’s world-leading life sciences research and trade policy-makers, public service prac��oners, academics and opportuni�es.
    [Show full text]
  • Principles for UK Research Institutes May 2018
    Principles for UK Research Institutes May 2018 The UK has a strong history of excellence in science and research, and a wide variety of kinds of research endeavours have contributed to this. Research institutes have played a valuable role, with their different models and functions increasing the diversity of the research landscape. In recent years a number of institutes have been established as a result of collaborations between multiple funders and universities, to advance the UK’s capacity in particular areas of research. The creation of UKRI presents an opportunity to consider how this model fits into the wider landscape of institutes, and what key principles, based on previous experience, can support the establishment of future institutes.1 The history of research institutes There is a wide variety of research institutions that can be seen as ‘institutes’, and their typical functions have evolved over time. National facilities have long been in existence, with the British Geological Survey dating back to 1835 and the National Physical Laboratory to 1900. Over the 20th century, a number of institutes were established to advance research in a particular field; these were typically either standalone or research council-funded institutes or were based at a university. Following this, in the early 21st century, institutes with other, strategic functions have been developed: those with coordinating functions (such as the National Cancer Research Institute) and Catapult Centres, funded by Innovate UK, which have more applied functions, in line with the Government’s focus on the economic potential of research. More recently, in the last few years, there have been a number of collaborations between multiple universities and funders to pool their resources and bring talented researchers together (physically or virtually) through the creation of institutes (for example the Alan Turing Institute and Henry Royce Institute).
    [Show full text]
  • The Case for a Gender Lens in STEM THROUGH BOTH Eyes: the Case for a Gender Lens in STEM ‘Think of a Gender Lens As Putting on Spectacles
    THE CASE FOR A GENDER LENS IN STEM THROUGH BOTH eyes: The case for a gender lens in STEM ‘Think of a gender lens as putting on spectacles. Out of one lens of the spectacles, you see the participation, needs and realities of women. Out of the other lens, you see the participation, needs and realities of men. Your sight or vision is the combination of what each eye sees.’ 2 contents Contents EXECUTive summary 4 1.0 introduction 7 2.0 Challenges 8 3.0 Solutions 23 Sir Peter Luff MP: A Call to Action 49 References 50 Authorship & Credits 51 ‘The country urgently needs more young people with STEM qualifications, which means we have to get more girls and women involved. This should be at the heart of education and skills policy – it isn’t an optional extra left to a few passionate enthusiasts. We have to make it everyone’s business’ Helen Wollaston, Director WISE ‘Our research shows that it is harder for girls to balance, or reconcile, their interest in science with femininity. The solution won’t lie in trying to change girls. The causes are rooted in, and perpetuated by, wider societal attitudes and social structures. We also need to think about the whole structure of our education system in England, which essentially channels children into narrow ‘tracks’ from a young age’ Professor Louise Archer, Director of ASPIRES, ‘The lack of girls and women in STEM blights lead coordinatior of TISME our society and our economy. There is no single solution, which is why I am glad to see that Sciencegrrl have come forward with a wide range of recommendations covering education, careers and the broader cultural challenges’ Chi Onwurah, MP for Newcastle upon Tyne ‘We are working to maximise employer engagement to help put science and maths in a careers context.
    [Show full text]