Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication (82Nd, New Orleans, Louisiana, August 3-8, 1999)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication (82Nd, New Orleans, Louisiana, August 3-8, 1999) , DOCUMENT RESUME ED 433 551 CS 510 132 TITLE Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication (82nd, New Orleans, Louisiana, August 3-8, 1999). Miscellaneous. INSTITUTION Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication. PUB DATE 1999-08-00 NOTE 178p.; For other sections of this proceedings, see CS 510 132-153. PUB TYPE Collected Works Proceedings (021) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC08 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Ethics; Foreign Countries; Higher Education; *Information Processing; Journalism Education; Journalism Research; *News Reporting; Professional Associations; Research Needs IDENTIFIERS *Environmental Reporting; India; Iowa; News Sources; *Risk Communication ABSTRACT The Miscellaneous section of the Proceedings contains the following 6 papers: "The Effect of Membership in the Society of Environmental Journalists on Inclusion of Enabling Information in Stories on Water Quality" (Michelle M. Tedford); "Press, Privacy and Presidential 'Proceedings': Moral Judgments and the Clinton-Lewinsky Affair" (Jennifer L. Lambe, Christina L. Fiebich, and Darcia Narvaez); "A Research Agenda for Establishing a Grounding for Journalistic Ethics" (Dan Shaver); "Framing an Environmental Controversy in India's English-Language Press: A Study of Text in Context" (Elizabeth Burch); "The Sources Iowans Trust: The Impact of Involvement on Credibility Perceptions and Channels Used for Environmental Issues" (Sunae Jo and Lulu Rodriguez); and "The Relationship of Risk Information Processing to Consideration of Behavioral Beliefs" (Robert J. Griffin, Kurt Neuwirth, James Giese, and Sharon Dunwoody). (RS) ******************************************************************************** Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. ******************************************************************************** Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication (82nd, New Orleans, Louisiana, August 3-8, 1999): Miscellaneous. Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication. 1999-08 (1 PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE AND U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION BEST COPY AVAILABLE DISSEMINATE THIS MATERIAL HAS Office of Educational Research and Improvement BEEN GRANTED BY EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC) This document has been reproduced as received from the person or organization originating it. Minor changes have been made to improve reproduction quality. TO THE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES ./1 INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC) Points of view or opinions stated in this 1 document do not necessarily represent official OERI position or policy. The effect of membership in the Society of Environmental Journalists on inclusion of enabling information in stories on water quality Michelle M. Tedford masters student, Ohio University E. W. Scripps School of Journalism 6798 Hoover Ave. Dayton, OH 45427 937-837-7021 [email protected] Submitted for consideration to the Graduate Education Interest Group of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication National Conference, August 1999. The effect of membership in the Society of Environmental Journalists on inclusion of enabling information in stories on water quality ABSTRACT This study builds on Rossow and Dunwoody's finding that enabling information in environmental stories is tied to editors' concerns for the issues. If membership is an indicator of concern, stories by SEJ members should include more enabling information from different sources, include more graphics, and influence the story's placement. In a look at water quality stories from 1993, none of these differences was found to correspond with membership when comparing member and non-member groups. 1 The effect of membership 1 The effect of membership in the Society of Environmental Journalists on inclusion of enabling information in stories on water quality In 1993, over 100,000 people were sickened from contamination to the municipal water supply in Milwaukee, Wisconsin.' It was an event heavily covered by national as well as local media. This contamination incident is only one of countless environmental risk issues being covered in daily newspapers throughout the country. Environmental risk communication informs the public of the danger, probability of occurrence/recurrence, causes and preventions of the risk in question. The effectiveness of risk communication holds implications for society, since the information can be used by the public to put demands on business or government to alleviate the risk to the community.2 One type of information is called "enabling" or "mobilizing" information. This is information that would be useful for readers trying to get more information about or to act on the reported issues. Environmental concern has been growing since the 1950s. In a 1994 public opinion poll, 61.1% of respondents believed that the government was "spending too little" to solve environmental problems.3 Since 1970 the year of the first Earth Day celebration media 1 Associated Press, "Milwaukee water suspect in illness," Capital Times; April 8, 1993: 1A. 2 Kandice L. Salomone, Michael R. Greenberg, Peter M. Sandman and David B. Sachsman, "A Question of Quality: How Journalists and News Sources Evaluate Coverage of Environmental Risk," Journal of Communication 40 (4): 117 (Autumn 1990). 3 James Shanahan and Katherine McComas, "Television's Portrayal of the Environment: 1991-1995," Journalism Quarterly 74 (1):150 (Spring 1997). The effect of membership 2 coverage of the environment has also increased.4 A need to improve the quality of this reporting was identified in the 1980s, and the Society of Environmental Journalists was founded in 1990. The society recognized that "the public is largely uninformed about environmental issues, and much of what it does know stems from mass media."5 The mission of SEJ, through programs and services, is to "advance public understanding of environmental issues by improving the quality, accuracy, and visibility of environmental reporting....SEJ acts to raise awareness among editors and other key decision makers in the media on the basic importance of environmental reporting."6 The purpose of this study is to determine whether membership in the Society of Environmental Journalists has a quantifiable impact on the product the environmental risk communication story. Following the pattern of a previous study by Rossow and Dunwoody,7 which found that editor concern for environmental issues increases the inclusion of enabling information, this study will compare enabling information by SEJ members and non-members by looking at water quality stories around the time of the Milwaukee water contamination. If reporter concern for the environment equates with membership in SEJ, then a similar increase in enabling information should be found. The effects of membership on journalists' stories has 4 C.R. Ader, "A longitudinal study of agenda setting for the issue of environmental pollution," Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 72 (2): 301 (Summer 1995). 5 Society of Environmental Journalists, "About SEJ," <http://www.sej.org/env_sej.htm>. 6Society of Environmental Journalists, "About SEJ." 7 Marshal D. Rossow and Sharon Dunwoody, "Inclusion of 'Useful' Detail in Newspaper Coverage ofa High Level Nuclear Waste Siting Controversy," Journalism Quarterly 68: 87-100 (Spring/Summer 1991). The effect of membership 3 not been widely researched, and this.study will not be able to indicate if concern led to membership, or membership led to concern. But if journalist concern furnishes the public with a better product that is, more useful information then their is a need to identify factors leading to a better product. LITERATURE REVIEW Need for Enabling Information The need for enabling information, while not called such, was voiced by environmental writer Bill McKibben in his 1992 book. He said we are living in an "age of missing information" about environmental issues.8 Since elites are considered to have an established connection to sources of influence, it can be surmised that the mass public is most at loss in the decision-making process when enabling information is missing.9 While missing information can lead to ignorance, enabling information can help bridge that gap between the elites and the public by providing an easy link between knowledge and action. The inclusion of mobilizing information, such as a phone number, address or details on a meeting, can increase public participation in the issue by reducing the time and resources the public must exert to follow up on an issue. The mobilizing effect can be further enhanced if the reader brings to the story concern for the issues being discussed.1° The finding that over half the 8 Shanahan and McComas, "Television's Portrayal of the Environment," 147. 9 Steven E. Hungerford and James B. Lemert, "Covering the Environment: A New 'Afghanistanism'?" Journalism Quarterly 50: 477 (Autumn 1973). 10 Carl R. Bybee, "Mobilizing Information and Reader Involvement: An Empirical Test," Journalism Quarterly 59: 399-400 (Autumn 1982). The effect of membership 4 respondents to an opinion poll believe the government is spending too little on environmental issues could signal such a predisposed motivation. Mobilizing information can also enhance a person's sense of responsibility or lessen fears that action on the issue would be inappropriate or inconsequentia1.II local Environmental Information This study looks specifically
Recommended publications
  • Photojournalism Photojournalism
    Photojournalism For this section, we'll be looking at photojournalism's impact on shaping people's opinions of the news & world events. Photojournalism From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Photojournalism is a particular form of journalism (the collecting, editing, and presenting of news material for publication or broadcast) that employs images in order to tell a news story. It is now usually understood to refer only to still images, but in some cases the term also refers to video used in broadcast journalism. Photojournalism is distinguished from other close branches of photography (e.g., documentary photography, social documentary photography, street photography or celebrity photography) by complying with a rigid ethical framework which demands that the work be both honest and impartial whilst telling the story in strictly journalistic terms. Photojournalists create pictures that contribute to the news media, and help communities connect with one other. Photojournalists must be well informed and knowledgeable about events happening right outside their door. They deliver news in a creative format that is not only informative, but also entertaining. Timeliness The images have meaning in the context of a recently published record of events. Objectivity The situation implied by the images is a fair and accurate representation of the events they depict in both content and tone. Narrative The images combine with other news elements to make facts relatable to audiences. Like a writer, a photojournalist is a reporter, but he or she must often make decisions instantly and carry photographic equipment, often while exposed to significant obstacles (e.g., physical danger, weather, crowds, physical access).
    [Show full text]
  • How to Fund Investigative Journalism Insights from the Field and Its Key Donors Imprint
    EDITION DW AKADEMIE | 2019 How to fund investigative journalism Insights from the field and its key donors Imprint PUBLISHER RESPONSIBLE PUBLISHED Deutsche Welle Jan Lublinski September 2019 53110 Bonn Carsten von Nahmen Germany © DW Akademie EDITORS AUTHOR Petra Aldenrath Sameer Padania Nadine Jurrat How to fund investigative journalism Insights from the field and its key donors Sameer Padania ABOUT THE REPORT About the report This report is designed to give funders a succinct and accessible introduction to the practice of funding investigative journalism around the world, via major contemporary debates, trends and challenges in the field. It is part of a series from DW Akademie looking at practices, challenges and futures of investigative journalism (IJ) around the world. The paper is intended as a stepping stone, or a springboard, for those who know little about investigative journalism, but who would like to know more. It is not a defense, a mapping or a history of the field, either globally or regionally; nor is it a description of or guide to how to conduct investigations or an examination of investigative techniques. These are widely available in other areas and (to some extent) in other languages already. Rooted in 17 in-depth expert interviews and wide-ranging desk research, this report sets out big-picture challenges and oppor- tunities facing the IJ field both in general, and in specific regions of the world. It provides donors with an overview of the main ways this often precarious field is financed in newsrooms and units large and small. Finally it provides high-level practical ad- vice — from experienced donors and the IJ field — to help new, prospective or curious donors to the field to find out how to get started, and what is important to do, and not to do.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Models of Cooperative Journalism
    COMPARATIVE MODELS OF COOPERATIVE JOURNALISM by Mercedes N . Rodriguez Journalism Department California Polytechnic State University San Luis Obispo 2012 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE I. Research Question ................................................................................................... 3 II . Literature Review ................................................................................................... 6 II . Methodology ........................................................................................................ 17 IV . Discussion .......................................................................................................... 19 V. Conclusion …....................................................................................................... 27 Bibliography ................................................................................ 28 2 Research Question: What are the advantage and disadvantages of cooperative journalism between professional journalists? Between established newsrooms and journalism students? Between citizen reporters and journalists from an established media outlet? And finally , what can be gained from cooperation between non-journalism professionals and professional journalists? Purpose Statement: The purpose of this study is to define the varying forms of cooperative journalism , its political implications , current uses , and potential ethical problems , and to determine if it is a viable option to counteract the decline of the traditional newsroom . Variables
    [Show full text]
  • ***Thesis Manuscript for Pr Uricchio
    A Proposal for a Code of Ethics for Collaborative Journalism in the Digital Age: The Open Park Code by Florence H. J. T. Gallez B.A. English and Russian The University of London, 1996 M.S. Journalism Boston University, 1999 Submitted to the Program in Comparative Media Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Comparative Media Studies at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology June 2012 © 2012 Florence Gallez. All rights reserved The author hereby grants to MIT permission to reproduce publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole or in part in any medium now known or hereafter created. Signature of Author: __________________________________________________ Program in Comparative Media Studies June 2012 Certified by: ________________________________________________________ David L. Chandler Science Writer MIT News Office Accepted by: ________________________________________________________ William Charles Uricchio Professor of Comparative Media Studies Director, Comparative Media Studies 1 A Proposal for a Code of Ethics for Collaborative Journalism in the Digital Age: The Open Park Code by Florence H. J. T. Gallez Submitted To The Program in Comparative Media Studies in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Comparative Media Studies ABSTRACT As American professional journalism with its established rules and values transitions to the little-regulated, ever-evolving world of digital news, few of its practitioners, contributors
    [Show full text]
  • Inclusive Management and Citizen Journalism: Journalists Supported by Citizens
    Inclusive Management and Citizen journalism: journalists supported by citizens Excerpt from the Methodology of Inclusive Management Intellectual Output, currently being designed and tested as part of the Erasmus+ project RTV - Key Competences in Media production for Radio, Film and Television By summarizing up the best definitions identified (“inclusive as the action or state of including, or of being included, within a group or structure in a constant exchange - among participants - of competences, skills, experiences, etc.” and “management as a guide to a group of people working in the organization and coordinating their efforts, towards the attainment of the common objective”), it is possible to define inclusive management as “a guide to a group of people working in the organization and coordinating their efforts, towards the attainment of the common objective. This guide is achieved also through the inclusion, within the mentioned group, of new people providing the group itself with their competences, skills, experiences and – above all – their personal perspective”1. The context in which the inclusive management’ methodology is well exploited is the labour world, where inclusive management becomes a pattern of practices by public managers that facilitate the inclusion of public employees, experts, the public, and politicians in collaboratively addressing public problems or concerns of public interest. Applying the inclusive management’ approach within the mass media industry means listing different approaches: collaborative learning: teachers involving learners; participation of experts: schools involving professional journalists; Citizen journalism: journalists supported by citizens. One way in which Inclusive management is adjusted to the mass media industry is represented by the citizen journalism (also renamed after open source journalism, street journalism, grassroots journalism, participatory journalism and democratic journalism).
    [Show full text]
  • What Is Collaborative Journalism?
    State + art of journalism collaborations What it is, what successful projects look like and how they work Presented by Stefanie Murray Center for Cooperative Media Montclair State University What is collaborative journalism? News organizations working together, and with non-news entities, to produce journalism. collaborativejournalism.org In a field that has focused on But ... competition over the last 50 years, not everyone agrees. Associated Press in 1846 JOAs in 1970s New America Media in 1990s History J-Lab in 2009 CPB funding in 2009 in the U.S. Pew: “New era of interest in partnerships” in 2014 Panama Papers, Pulitzers in 2016 Note: Longtime partnerships between ethnic + community media State of collaboration Common, widely accepted Becoming more sophisticated Studied as its own approach to journalism Awards Annual conference Expanding to include more non-news collaborativejournalism.org Why collaboration is common Industry contraction Business model changes Rise of nonprofit news Funding The competitor has changed collaborativejournalism.org Public Media Nonprofits Independent media Who is Alternative news media collaborating? News startups Formal cooperatives International media Legacy media Who is collaborating? collaborativejournalism.org Who isn’t Commercial television Newspapers (although this is collaborating? changing) Newspapers are joining in collaborativejournalism.org Why collaborate? ● More resources ● Diversity ● Expertise ● Reach ● Access ● Influence ● Attention collaborativejournalism.org Commons ways collaborations start $ Photo by Mstyslav Chernov via Wikimedia Commons collaborativejournalism.org Models of collaboration Time: ● Temporary ● Ongoing Models Level of integration: ● Separately creating content ● Creating content together ● Full integration Important projects Resolve Philadelphia Colorado Media Project Granite State News Wichita Journalism Collab Your Voice Ohio CrossCheck/First Draft FinCEN Files Great Lakes Now Several INN-led projects Lots and lots more ….
    [Show full text]
  • Building a Tool Set for Journalism Collaborations by Heather Bryant
    Building a tool set for journalism collaborations By Heather Bryant A collaborative journalism guide from the Center for Cooperative Media at Montclair State University 1 About the Center for Cooperative Media The mission of the Center for Cooperative Media at Montclair State University is to grow and strengthen local journalism, and in doing so, serve New Jersey citizens. The Center does that through the use of partnerships, collaborations, training, product development, research and communication. It works with more than 270 partners throughout the Garden State as part of a network known as the NJ News Commons, which is its flagship project. The network includes hyperlocal digital publishers, public media, newspa- pers, television outlets, radio stations, multimedia news organizations and independent journalists. The Center is also a national leader in the study of collaborative journalism. It believes that collaboration is a key compo- nent of the future success of local news organizations and healthy news ecosystems. The Center is a grant-funded organization based at Montclair State University’s School of Communication and Media. The Center is supported with funding from Montclair State University, the Geraldine R. Dodge Foundation, Democracy Fund, the New Jersey Local News Lab (a partnership of the Geraldine R. Dodge Foundation, Democracy Fund, and Community Foundation of New Jersey), and the Abrams Foundation. For more information, visit CenterforCooperativeMedia.org. About the author Heather Bryant is the founder and director of Project Facet, an open source infrastructure project that supports newsroom collaboration with tools to manage the logistics of creating, editing and distributing collaborative content, managing projects, facilitating collaborative relationships and sharing the best practices of collaborative journalism.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative Content Analysis of Environmental News Coverage in Time and the Eekw Ly Review Saritdet Marukatat Iowa State University
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 1991 A comparative content analysis of environmental news coverage in Time and The eekW ly review Saritdet Marukatat Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Part of the Environmental Education Commons, Environmental Indicators and Impact Assessment Commons, Journalism Studies Commons, and the Natural Resources Management and Policy Commons Recommended Citation Marukatat, Saritdet, "A comparative content analysis of environmental news coverage in Time and The eW ekly review" (1991). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 16827. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/16827 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A comparative content analysis of environmental news coverage in Time and The Weekly Review by Saritdet Marukatat A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Major: Journalism and Mass Communication Signatures have been redacted for privacy Iowa State University Ames, Iowa 1991 ii TABLE 01" COHTERTS Page INTRODUCTION 1 Statement of Problem 1 Purpose of Study 3 About the Magazines Studied
    [Show full text]
  • Sharing the News: Journalistic Collaboration As Field Repair
    International Journal of Communication 9(2015), 1966–1984 1932–8036/20150005 Sharing the News: Journalistic Collaboration as Field Repair LUCAS GRAVES1 University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA MAGDA KONIECZNA Temple University, USA Organized journalism in every era offers examples of news sharing: cooperative practices by which rival news outlets work together to produce or distribute news. Today, this behavior is being institutionalized by certain emergent news organizations. To understand news sharing, we argue, requires attention to how these journalists seek to not only practice but repair the field of journalism. This article analyzes news sharing as a form of field repair, drawing on ethnographic studies of investigative news nonprofits and professional fact-checking groups. We argue that journalism’s “high- modern” era, with its broad alignment of economic and professional goals, highlighted competitive rather than collaborative elements of newswork. As that alignment unravels, journalists are engaging in explicit news sharing in pursuit of two intertwined goals: to increase the impact of their own reporting and to build institutional resources for public- affairs journalism to be practiced more widely across the field. Keywords: public affairs journalism, news nonprofits, fact-checking, collaboration Introduction Journalism is usually seen as a competitive occupation, defined by the rivalry among individual reporters and among news organizations. This is not without reason. Journalists guard their sources and stories jealously, sometimes even from peers in the same newsroom. Covering a story first or best brings professional rewards, while being beaten by a rival is a badge of shame for reporter and news outlet alike. Most important, almost all news organizations—even noncommercial ones—depend for their survival on attracting loyal audiences.
    [Show full text]
  • Hearken–Curious City
    HEARKEN–CURIOUS CITY AN INNOVATIVE MODEL FOR “PUBLIC-POWERED” JOURNALISM Local That Works: Public Radio Case Study No. 2 By Richard Tait and Mark Fuerst October 2016 LOCAL THAT WORKS The premise of these four case studies, prepared for the Eastern Region Public Media PUBLIC RADIO SUPER-REGIONAL CONFERENCE (Oct. 25–27, 2016): stations need and want to be “more local." The evidence we have collected suggests they will succeed in doing so by filling gaps in local news coverage and playing a larger role in the daily life of their communities. It is safe to assume that all stations would do more of this—except for the fact that "being local" takes a good deal of money and staff. In an era of declining tax support, rural and small-market stations are getting squeezed. Through no fault of their own, their long-term prospects are being eroded by a combination of forces, including the inherent financial limits of a small local audience and small local economies; increasing ease of access to national program material; and increasing costs associated with multiplatform service. This is not a new problem. The "large/small" divide has permeated system politics. Meanwhile, the growing "capacity gap" between smaller and larger stations—in membership, staffing and digital tools—has been well documented by the PUBLIC MEDIA FUTURES FORUM. If public broadcasting is to retain its NEAR-UNIVERSAL REACH, the system will have to develop ways to sustain the service of small-market, especially rural, stations, and find ways to empower them to be both sustainable and more local.
    [Show full text]
  • Cross-Border Collaborative Journalism: Why Journalists and Scholars Should Talk About an Emerging Method’, Journal of Applied Journalism & Media Studies 5: 2, Pp
    NOTE: This is the final accepted version upon inclusion of peer-review comments etc. as submitted by the author to the copy-editor. This version is thus not the final published version and may include syntax mistakes, typos and so forth. You find the final version at http://www.ingentaconnect.com/contentone/intellect/ajms/2016/00000005/00000002 /art00008, suggested quotation: Alfter, B. (2016), ‘Cross-border collaborative journalism: Why journalists and scholars should talk about an emerging method’, Journal of Applied Journalism & Media Studies 5: 2, pp. 301–315, doi: 10.1386/ajms.5.2.301_1 Cross-border collaborative journalism: Why journalists and scholars should talk about an emerging method By Brigitte Alfter, Editor Europe at Journalismfund.eu Abstract When politics, business and crime cross borders, journalism has to do the same in order to provide adequate coverage. Based upon this simple logic journalists have experimented with cross-border collaborative journalism for decades but more intensely so since the late 1990ies. Especially investigative journalists are establishing networks, while mainstreaming of networked journalism only emerges slowly. In this article I argue that it is time to attempt a methodology of cross-border collaborative journalism in order to more systematically develop the model, to share it with peers and the next generation and to open it for scholars to analyse and criticise it. The article is a practitioner’s contribution based upon own experience and a series of interviews with cross-border journalism
    [Show full text]
  • Cross-Border Journalism As a Method ”Cross-Border Journalism Isn’T Global Migration, Climate Change, Transnational Crime
    Cross-border Journalism as a Method ”Cross-border journalism isn’t Global migration, climate change, transnational crime. Today, many stories have effects around the just for superstars. It can be globe. Journalists need to collaborate across borders learned and practiced by any if they want to fulfill the watchdog function of the press. journalist interested in the method.“ The ”Panama Papers“ investigation is a great example of how cross-border journalism holds the powerful to account. One year after the investigation into tax-eva- sion practices of the global elite, the publication had historic global effects: States collected a total of 100 million dollars in taxes and initiated at least 150 inqui- ries, audits or investigations by police, tax authorities, mafia prosecutors, etc. in 80 countries.* Based on her own journalistic experience as a Brus- sels correspondent, ICIJ member and cross-border pioneer, investigative journalist Brigitte Alfter devel- oped a step-by-step guide to teaching the method of cross-border journalism. Brigitte Alfter Journalist and author of ‘Cross- Border Collaborative Journalism: A Step-By-Step Guide’ @hackette7 * https://panamapapers.sueddeutsche.de/ articles/e329109/ ”Cross-border journalism This booklet summarizes the basics of Brigitte Alfter’s method and gives an overview of the seven is a process.“ process steps of cross-border journalism: — says Brigitte Alfter Research Research Plan Research Team 6 Publication Story Idea 7 Networking Follow-up What is cross-border Journalists from different countries … journalism? … collaborate to research a shared theme or story. They compile, mutually cross-check and merge their findings in order to … … fact check and tell these findings to their individual audiences on a national, regional or local level.
    [Show full text]