DOCSLIB.ORG

Athens at War : the Peloponnesian War

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Athens at War : the Peloponnesian War Athens at War : The Peloponnesian War . Gillian Shepherd Gillian Shepherd Thucydides: • Athenian general in 424 BC • I.e. at least 30 yrs old then – born between 460-55? • Probably related to Kimon • Probably died c. 400 • Author of a history of the Peloponnesian War in 8 books (incomplete) • I.E. the war between Athens and Sparta and their respective allies between 431-404 BC • Complicated writing style • Caught plague at some point between 430-27, but recovered (Thuc. 2.48) • Exiled in 424 for failure to save Amphipolis (northern Greece) from the Image Source Page: Spartan Brasidas h0p://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Thucydides_pushkin01.jpg Cast of a bust of Thucydides, Pushkin Museum I lived through the whole of [the war], being of an age to understand what was happening, and I put my mind to the subject so as to get an accurate view of it. It happened, too, that I was banished from my country for twenty years after my command at Amphipolis; I saw what was being done on both sides, particularly on the Peloponnesian side, because of my exile, and this leisure gave me rather exceptional facilities for looking into things Thucydides 5.26.5 Thucydides (I. 22) describes his method: In this history I have made use of set speeches some of which were delivered just before and others during the war. I have found it difficult to remember the precise words used in the speeches which I listened to myself and my various informants have experienced the same difficulty; so my method has been, while keeping as closely as possible to the general sense of the words that were actually used, to make the speakers say what, in my opinion, was called for by each situation And with regard to my factual reporting of the events of the war I have made it a principle not to write down the first story that came my way, and not even to be guided by my own general impressions; either I was present myself at the events I have described, or else I heard of them from eye-witnesses whose reports I have checked with as much thoroughness as possible. Not that even so the truth was easy to discover: different eye-witnesses give different accounts of the same events, speaking out of partiality for one side or the other or else from imperfect memories Of all the legitimate [children of Peisistratos] it is only in the case of Hippias that there is a record of any children being born, as is shown by the altar [in the Pythium] and by a pillar set up on the Athenian acropolis to commemorate the crimes of the dictator. On this pillar no child of Thessalos or Hipparchos is mentioned, but there are five children of Hippias… and on the same pillar his name comes next after the name of his father, which again is the natural thing, since he was the next oldest to him and he held the dictatorship. Thucydides 6.55 Thucydides the Athenian wrote the history of the war fought between Athens and Sparta, beginning the account at the very outbreak of the war, in the belief that I was going to be a great war and more worth writing about than any of those which had taken place in the past… this was the greatest disturbance in the history of the Hellenes, affecting also a large part of the non-Hellenic world, and indeed, I might almost say, the whole of mankind. For though I have found it impossible, because of its remoteness in time, to acquire a really precise knowledge of the distant past or even of the history preceding our own period, yet, after looking back into it as far as I can, all the evidence leads me to conclude that these periods were not great periods either in warfare or in anything else. Thucydides 1.1 And it may well be that my history will seem less easy to read because of the absence in it of a romantic element. It will be enough for me, however, if these words of mine are judged useful by those who want to understand clearly the events which happened in the past and which (human nature being what it is) will, at some time or other and in much the same ways, be repeated in the future. My work is not a piece of writing designed to meet the taste of an immediate public, but was done to last forever (ktema es aei). Thuc. 1.22 Perikles: • C. 495-29, an Alkmaeonid • An aristocrat, but became a highly influential figure in democratic Athens • Impressive orator • Heavily involved in Athens’ public building programme of the 440s-30s • Caught the plague and died in 429 BC • Was responsible for the introduction of a number of measures including: • Pay for citizens doing jury service (possibly also theoric pay, ie grants to enable poor citizens to attend the theatre), c. 454 • The citizenship law of 451, ie a citizen had to have an Athenian mother as well as an Athenian father Image source page: h0p://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Pericles_Pio-ClemenCno_Inv269.jpg “Perikles, son of Xanthippos, an Athenian” Roman copy of a Greek original of c. 430 BC The Peloponnesian War (431-404 BC) • Fought between Athens and her allies (the Delian League: cf. Thuc. 1.99)… • And Sparta and her allies (the Peloponnesian League) • Competing powers: according to Thucydides, Spartan unrest at increasing power of Athens • Phase I: the “Archidamian” or “Ten years war” • Ended with the “Peace of Nicias” in 421 • Treaty did not last long – only about 7 years before hostilities reopened • Phase II: the ‘Ionian’ War, 415-404 • Athens surrendered to Sparta in 404 BC Image source page: h0p://www.utexas.edu/courses/introgreece/pel_war_map_1.jpg Our constitution is called a democracy because the power is in the hands not of a minority but of the whole people…No one, so long as he has it in him to be of service to the state, is kept in political obscurity because of poverty… We regard wealth as something to be properly used, rather than as something to boast about. As for poverty, no one need be ashamed to admit it: the real shame is in not taking practical measures to escape from it. Thuc. 2.34 ff (Perikles’ funeral oration) Conjectured location of the demosion sema Cf. Thuc. 2.34: The coffins are laid in the public sepulchre (demosion sema)which is situated in the most beautiful suburb of the city; there they always bury those fallen in war, except indeed those who fell at Marathon… See also Pausanias 1.29 Image Source Page: h0p://www.greece-athens.com/page.php?page_id=60 Excavations of the site identified as the demosion sema (Salaminos St, Athens) NB: polyandria Image source page: h0p://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Pelopennesian_War,_Walls_ProtecCng_the_City,_431_B.C..JPG People in perfect health suddenly began to have burning feelings in the head; their eyes became red and inflamed; inside their mouths there was bleeding from the throat and tongue, and the breath became unnatural and unpleasant… the skin was rather reddish and livid, breaking out into small pustules and ulcers… inside there was a feeling of burning, so that people could not bear the touch of even the lightest linen clothing… and indeed most of all would have liked to plunge into cold water. Many of the sick who were uncared for actually did so, plunging into the water tanks in an effort to relieve a thirst that was unquenchable… then the disease descended to the bowels, producing violent ulcerations and uncontrollable diarrhoea, so that most of them died later as a result of the weakness caused by this… Thuc. II.49 Image Source Page: h0p://3.bp.blogspot.com/_7QpFAh-lss8/S9M7teAA3vI/AAAAAAAAApY/cLRqw1PhDpY/s1600/Kerameikos.jpg Kerameikos metro station site Greek settlements in Sicily and Southern Italy Image source: http://www.utexas.edu/courses/greeksahoy!/maps.html At the time when the first ambassadors from Athens had come to look into the question of the money, the Segestans had deceived them by the following plan. They took the Athenians to the Temple of Aphrodite at Eryx and showed them the treasure laid up there in offerings – bowls, goblets, censers and much else, which, being silver, looked imposing to the eye even though the value in money was comparatively small. They also entertained the ships’ crews in their private houses, and did this by collecting together all the cups of gold and silver in Segesta itself, borrowing others from the neighbouring cities, Phoenician or Hellenic, and then letting each host produce them at the banquets as if they were his own property. All used pretty much the same articles and everywhere there was a great abundance of them, so the Athenians from the ships were astonished at it and, when they got back to Athens, told everyone of the vast quantities of valuable objects which they had seen. Thuc. 6.46 Image Source Page: h0p://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Segesta-Temple01.JPG The Greek Temple at Segesta (Elymian), late 5th cent. BC The Sicilian Expedition (415-413 BC) • Athens sends 134 triremes initially • i.e. 5,100 hoplites; also archers, light troops, slingers and cavalry and 130 supply ships • Commanded by generals Nicias, Alcibiades and Lamachas (later killed in action) • Nicias reluctant and had attempted to dissuade the Athenians from the expedition • Alcibiades in favour of it, but was recalled to Athens to answer a charge of impiety (mutiliation of the herms) • Athens sent reinforcements in 414 Image Source Page: • Gylippus (Spartan commander) h0p://www.trentu.ca/faculty/rfitzsimons/AHCL3958H/Calendar.htm gained Sicilian allies advised the Syracusans under Hermocrates to engage Athens at sea Image Source Page: h0p://library.thinkquest.org/06aug/00336/greek_ships.htm The trireme “Olympias” Image Source Page: h0p://galeri.uludagsozluk.com/r/trireme-179863/ Image Source Page: h0p://www.utexas.edu/courses/introgreece/lecture_27.html The Great Harbour, Syracuse, Sicily .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Fleet of Syracuse (480-413 BCE)
    ANDREAS MORAKIS The Fleet of Syracuse (480-413 BCE) The Deinomenids The ancient sources make no reference to the fleet of Syracuse until the be- ginning of the 5th century BCE. In particular, Thucydides, when considering the Greek maritime powers at the time of the rise of the Athenian empire, includes among them the tyrants of Sicily1. Other sources refer more precisely to Gelon’s fleet, during the Carthaginian invasion in Sicily. Herodotus, when the Greeks en- voys asked for Gelon’s help to face Xerxes’ attack, mentions the lord of Syracuse promising to provide, amongst other things, 200 triremes in return of the com- mand of the Greek forces2. The same number of ships is also mentioned by Ti- maeus3 and Ephorus4. It is very odd, though, that we hear nothing of this fleet during the Carthaginian campaign and the Battle of Himera in either the narration of Diodorus, or the briefer one of Herodotus5. Nevertheless, other sources imply some kind of naval fighting in Himera. Pausanias saw offerings from Gelon and the Syracusans taken from the Phoenicians in either a sea or a land battle6. In addition, the Scholiast to the first Pythian of Pindar, in two different situations – the second one being from Ephorus – says that Gelon destroyed the Carthaginians in a sea battle when they attacked Sicily7. 1 Thuc. I 14, 2: ὀλίγον τε πρὸ τῶν Μηδικῶν καὶ τοῦ ∆αρείου θανάτου … τριήρεις περί τε Σικελίαν τοῖς τυράννοις ἐς πλῆθος ἐγένοντο καὶ Κερκυραίοις. 2 Hdt. VII 158. 3 Timae. FGrHist 566 F94= Polyb. XII 26b, 1-5, but the set is not the court of Gelon, but the conference of the mainland Greeks in Corinth.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient History Sourcebook: 11Th Brittanica: Sparta SPARTA an Ancient City in Greece, the Capital of Laconia and the Most Powerful State of the Peloponnese
    Ancient History Sourcebook: 11th Brittanica: Sparta SPARTA AN ancient city in Greece, the capital of Laconia and the most powerful state of the Peloponnese. The city lay at the northern end of the central Laconian plain, on the right bank of the river Eurotas, a little south of the point where it is joined by its largest tributary, the Oenus (mount Kelefina). The site is admirably fitted by nature to guard the only routes by which an army can penetrate Laconia from the land side, the Oenus and Eurotas valleys leading from Arcadia, its northern neighbour, and the Langada Pass over Mt Taygetus connecting Laconia and Messenia. At the same time its distance from the sea-Sparta is 27 m. from its seaport, Gythium, made it invulnerable to a maritime attack. I.-HISTORY Prehistoric Period.-Tradition relates that Sparta was founded by Lacedaemon, son of Zeus and Taygete, who called the city after the name of his wife, the daughter of Eurotas. But Amyclae and Therapne (Therapnae) seem to have been in early times of greater importance than Sparta, the former a Minyan foundation a few miles to the south of Sparta, the latter probably the Achaean capital of Laconia and the seat of Menelaus, Agamemnon's younger brother. Eighty years after the Trojan War, according to the traditional chronology, the Dorian migration took place. A band of Dorians united with a body of Aetolians to cross the Corinthian Gulf and invade the Peloponnese from the northwest. The Aetolians settled in Elis, the Dorians pushed up to the headwaters of the Alpheus, where they divided into two forces, one of which under Cresphontes invaded and later subdued Messenia, while the other, led by Aristodemus or, according to another version, by his twin sons Eurysthenes and Procles, made its way down the Eurotas were new settlements were formed and gained Sparta, which became the Dorian capital of Laconia.
    [Show full text]
  • Excavating Classical Amphipolis & on the Lacedaemonian General
    Adelphi University Adelphi Digital Commons Anthropology Faculty Publications Anthropology 12-1-2002 Excavating Classical Amphipolis & On the Lacedaemonian General Brasidas Chaido Koukouli-Chrysanthaki Anagnostis P. Agelarakis Adelphi University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.adelphi.edu/ant_pubs Part of the Anthropology Commons Repository Citation Koukouli-Chrysanthaki, Chaido and Agelarakis, Anagnostis P., "Excavating Classical Amphipolis & On the Lacedaemonian General Brasidas" (2002). Anthropology Faculty Publications. 12. https://digitalcommons.adelphi.edu/ant_pubs/12 This Journal Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Anthropology at Adelphi Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Anthropology Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Adelphi Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 3 Excavating Classical Amphipolis Chaido Koukouli -Chrysanthaki The excavations carried out by D. Lazaridis between discovered and excavated;5 there is strong evidence 1956 and 1984 uncovered part of the ancient city of that the city's theatre was located next to it. 6 Amphipolis and its cemeteries, 1 [fig. 1] namely the external walls, the acropolis and, within the walls, In the northern part of the city were discovered: the remains of public and private buildings. On the sanctuary of Klio/ founded during the earliest years acropolis, the Early Christian basilicas destroyed the of the colony; further to the west, a small sanctuary city's important sanctuaries - those of Artemis of Attis dating to the Hellenistic and Early Roman Tauropolos,2 Athena3 and Asclepios4 - which literary periods;8 and, outside the north wall, a small sanctu­ sources and fragmentary votive inscriptions locate ary of a nymph.
    [Show full text]
  • A-Level Classical Civilisation Mark Scheme Unit
    AS-LEVEL Classical Civilisation CIV2D Athenian Imperialism Mark scheme 2020 June 2015 Version 1.0 Final Mark Scheme Mark schemes are prepared by the Lead Assessment Writer and considered, together with the relevant questions, by a panel of subject teachers. This mark scheme includes any amendments made at the standardisation events which all associates participate in and is the scheme which was used by them in this examination. The standardisation process ensures that the mark scheme covers the students’ responses to questions and that every associate understands and applies it in the same correct way. As preparation for standardisation each associate analyses a number of students’ scripts. Alternative answers not already covered by the mark scheme are discussed and legislated for. If, after the standardisation process, associates encounter unusual answers which have not been raised they are required to refer these to the Lead Assessment Writer. It must be stressed that a mark scheme is a working document, in many cases further developed and expanded on the basis of students’ reactions to a particular paper. Assumptions about future mark schemes on the basis of one year’s document should be avoided; whilst the guiding principles of assessment remain constant, details will change, depending on the content of a particular examination paper. Further copies of this mark scheme are available from aqa.org.uk Copyright © 2015 AQA and its licensors. All rights reserved. AQA retains the copyright on all its publications. However, registered schools/colleges for AQA are permitted to copy material from this booklet for their own internal use, with the following important exception: AQA cannot give permission to schools/colleges to photocopy any material that is acknowledged to a third party even for internal use within the centre.
    [Show full text]
  • Athens' Domain
    Athens’ Domain: The Loss of Naval Supremacy and an Empire Keegan Laycock Acknowledgements This paper has a lot to owe to the support of Dr. John Walsh. Without his encouragement, guid- ance, and urging to come on a theoretically educational trip to Greece, this paper would be vastly diminished in quality, and perhaps even in existence. I am grateful for the opportunity I have had to present it and the insight I have gained from the process. Special thanks to the editors and or- ganizers of Canta/ἄειδε for their own patience and persistence. %1 For the Athenians, the sea has been a key component of culture, economics, and especial- ly warfare. The Peloponnesian War (431-404 BC) displayed how control of the waves was vital for victory. This was not wholly apparent at the start of the conflict. The Peloponnesian League was militarily led by Sparta who was the greatest land power in Greece; to them naval warfare was excessive. Athens, as the head of the Delian League, was the greatest sea power in Greece whose strengths lay in their navy. However, through a combination of factors, Athens lost control of the sea and lost the war despite being the superior naval power at the war’s outset. Ultimately, Athens lost because they were unable to maintain strong naval authority. The geographic position of Athens and many of its key resources ensured land-based threats made them vulnerable de- spite their naval advantage. Athens also failed to exploit their naval supremacy as they focused on land-based wars in Sicily while the Peloponnesian League built up a rivaling navy of its own.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Balkans Cradle of Aegean Culture
    ANTONIJE SHKOKLJEV SLAVE NIKOLOVSKI - KATIN PREHISTORY CENTRAL BALKANS CRADLE OF AEGEAN CULTURE Prehistory - Central Balkans Cradle of Aegean culture By Antonije Shkokljev Slave Nikolovski – Katin Translated from Macedonian to English and edited By Risto Stefov Prehistory - Central Balkans Cradle of Aegean culture Published by: Risto Stefov Publications [email protected] Toronto, Canada All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system without written consent from the author, except for the inclusion of brief and documented quotations in a review. Copyright 2013 by Antonije Shkokljev, Slave Nikolovski – Katin & Risto Stefov e-book edition 2 Index Index........................................................................................................3 COMMON HISTORY AND FUTURE ..................................................5 I - GEOGRAPHICAL CONFIGURATION OF THE BALKANS.........8 II - ARCHAEOLOGICAL DISCOVERIES .........................................10 III - EPISTEMOLOGY OF THE PANNONIAN ONOMASTICS.......11 IV - DEVELOPMENT OF PALEOGRAPHY IN THE BALKANS....33 V – THRACE ........................................................................................37 VI – PREHISTORIC MACEDONIA....................................................41 VII - THESSALY - PREHISTORIC AEOLIA.....................................62 VIII – EPIRUS – PELASGIAN TESPROTIA......................................69
    [Show full text]
  • Thucydides, Sicily, and the Defeat of Athens Tim Rood
    Thucydides, Sicily, and the Defeat of Athens Tim Rood To cite this version: Tim Rood. Thucydides, Sicily, and the Defeat of Athens. KTÈMA Civilisations de l’Orient, de la Grèce et de Rome antiques, Université de Strasbourg, 2017, 42, pp.19-39. halshs-01670082 HAL Id: halshs-01670082 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01670082 Submitted on 21 Dec 2017 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Les interprétations de la défaite de 404 Edith Foster Interpretations of Athen’s defeat in the Peloponnesian war ............................................................. 7 Edmond LÉVY Thucydide, le premier interprète d’une défaite anormale ................................................................. 9 Tim Rood Thucydides, Sicily, and the Defeat of Athens ...................................................................................... 19 Cinzia Bearzot La συμφορά de la cité La défaite d’Athènes (405-404 av. J.-C.) chez les orateurs attiques .................................................. 41 Michel Humm Rome, une « cité grecque
    [Show full text]
  • Athenian Empire 478To 404B.C. Formation Of
    ATHENIAN EMPIRE 478 TO 404 B.C. FORMATION OF DELIAN LEAGUE TO FALL OF ATHENS ERA SUMMARY – ATHENIAN EMPIRE In the years following the Persian War, Athens was rebuilt and the Greek navy expanded its domination of the Aegean Sea. Further naval victories over Persia resulted in the freeing of several Ionian Greek colonies from the Persian yoke and the increased prestige of Greece as a sea power. Athenian control of the Greek navy was made possible the by creation of the Delian league, a group of Greek colonies located in the Aegean Sea united for defense. Although this league was nominally a confederation, it was dominated by Athens, and eventually became the foundation of the Athenian Empire. Athens became very wealthy due both to its domination of trade in the region and also to the inflow of tribute that had to be paid to Athens in return for protection from Persia. The most important statesmen in Athens in the years immediately after the Persian War, were Cimon, son of Miltiades, and Aristides. Both were involved in the organization of the Delian league and the rebuilding of Athens, including the construction of a fortified wall around the city to protect it from future invasions. Sparta opposed the building of walled cities, lest they fall into enemy hands, but the Athenians insisted and eventually a great wall was built from Athens to the sea, wide enough to drive two Chariots abreast. During the same period, great temples and state houses were built, funded mostly from the Delian league tributes, on a scale never before seen on the continent of Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • The Experience of Battle in the Sicilian Expedition: from the Great Harbour to the River Assinarus
    Western University Scholarship@Western Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository 4-22-2013 12:00 AM The Experience of Battle in the Sicilian Expedition: From the Great Harbour to the River Assinarus Frank D. D'Earmo The University of Western Ontario Supervisor Dr. Bernd Steinbock The University of Western Ontario Graduate Program in Classics A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree in Master of Arts © Frank D. D'Earmo 2013 Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd Part of the Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons Recommended Citation D'Earmo, Frank D., "The Experience of Battle in the Sicilian Expedition: From the Great Harbour to the River Assinarus" (2013). Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository. 1231. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/1231 This Dissertation/Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Western. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Western. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE EXPERIENCE OF BATTLE IN THE SICILIAN EXPEDITION: FROM THE GREAT HARBOUR TO THE RIVER ASSINARUS Monograph by Frank D’Earmo Graduate Program in Classical Studies A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts The School of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies The University of Western Ontario London, Ontario, Canada © Frank D’Earmo 2013 Abstract Drawing on John Keegan’s Face of Battle approach, this MA thesis reconstructs the soldiers’ experience during the final phase of the Athenians’ Sicilian Expedition (415- 413 BC).
    [Show full text]
  • Nicias and the Sicilian Expedition
    Copyright © Heritage History 2010 Some rights reserved This text was produced and distributed by Heritage History, an organization dedicated to the preservation of classical juvenile history books, and to the promotion of the works of traditional history authors. The books which Heritage History republishes are in the public domain and are no longer protected by the original copyright. They may therefore be reproduced within the United States without paying a royalty to the author. The text and pictures used to produce this version of the work, PREFACE however, are the property of Heritage History and are subject to certain restrictions. These restrictions are imposed for the purpose of protecting the integrity of the work, for preventing plagiarism, and for helping to The ultimate, it might be said, the only authority for assure that compromised versions of the work are not widely the military and political facts given in this narrative, is disseminated. Thucydides. These facts have been admirably expounded In order to preserve information regarding the origin of this and arranged by Grote, to whom everyone interested in text, a copyright by the author, and a Heritage History distribution date Greek history must be under obligations which cannot be are included at the foot of every page of text. We require all electronic adequately expressed. I have to acknowledge specially my and printed versions of this text to include these markings, and that indebtedness to the maps which accompany the sixth users adhere to the following restrictions. volume of his history. In writing this little book I have also 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Hippeis the Aristocrats of Athens Hippeis the Aristocrats of Athens
    hippeis The aristocrats of Athens hippeis The aristocrats of Athens The use of the horse with military chariots is known to go back at least as far as the 16th carved, they were a display of the wealth and power of their dedicators. century BC. In the 2nd millennium BC, the significance of horses is marked by the practice of The earliest and most well-known of these statues is the ‘Rampin Horseman’ (550 BC), whose burying them along with their owners. In the Trojan War, the Greeks conquered Troy by offer- head is in the Louvre Museum (Fig. 1). He wears a victory wreath of oak or celery leaves, ing their enemies a ‘gift’ in the form of the infamous Trojan horse (‘Doureios hippos’). which is associated with a victory in the Nemean or the Isthmian games. Owning and maintaining a horse was an expensive matter. According to literary sources, in Another unique statue is the ‘Persian’ or ‘Scythian’ horseman (520 BC) (Fig. 2). He wears 421 BC, a horse cost 1200 silver Attic drachmae. This was a vast amount of money, afford- an eastern costume with diamond and palmette decoration, similar to that on a plate in able only by the aristocrats, and thus the horse was a symbol of power, wealth and social Oxford, bearing the inscription ‘Μιλτιάδης καλός’ (‘Miltiades is good-looking’). This has led status. In the 6th century BC, many aristocratic families flaunted their superiority by selecting to the suggestion that this statue may in fact be a representation of the military general names that began or ended with the word ‘hippos’ (meaning horse; e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Inference & Expectation in Thuc. 5.6-10 Joseph A. Ponczoch
    Inference & Expectation in Thuc. 5.6-10 Joseph A. Ponczoch (University of Texas, Austin) Thucydides’ portrayal of the “Second Battle of Amphipolis” (422 BC) distinctly focuses on the perspectives and agency of Cleon and Brasidas. Focalization and intratextual references reveal how much the two generals know about each other, how other individuals characterize them, and how this episode compares with the “First Battle of Amphipolis” (424 BC) or the Athenian success at Pylos (425 BC). This paper will discuss how Thuc. 5.6–10 attributes numerous inferences and expectations to both Brasidas and Cleon as a vital means of revealing their contrasting demeanor and military competency. Much in this episode is affected, for example, by the striking claims that Thucydides attributes to Cleon’s own soldiers regarding their general and his opponent. The soldiers state, in effect, that they fear both Cleon’s ineptitude and Brasidas’ expertise; and they maintain further that Cleon is cowardly while Brasidas is daring. These comments appear in the second chapter of this five-chapter episode; they appear early and they residually affect the reader’s attitude toward Brasidas and Cleon to the extent that even a rather neutral description of one or the other bears ill for Cleon and speaks well of Brasidas. What’s more, when Cleon attempts to appease these dissatisfied soldiers, he actually leads them into Brasidas’ trap. Each attribution of motive exposes Cleon’s naiveté, while underscoring Brasidas’ careful tactics; and such is generally consistent with earlier depictions of these two men. But the effect here cannot simply be to further undermine Cleon by asserting his personal responsibility for this Athenian loss, or to further praise Brasidas for saving Amphipolis and winning over the Amphipolitans to the Spartan cause.
    [Show full text]