DOCSLIB.ORG

Mark Scheme F393 Greek History

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mark Scheme F393 Greek History GCE Classics: Ancient History Unit F393: Greek History: conflict and culture Advanced GCE Mark Scheme for June 2016 Oxford Cambridge and RSA Examinations OCR (Oxford Cambridge and RSA) is a leading UK awarding body, providing a wide range of qualifications to meet the needs of candidates of all ages and abilities. OCR qualifications include AS/A Levels, Diplomas, GCSEs, Cambridge Nationals, Cambridge Technicals, Functional Skills, Key Skills, Entry Level qualifications, NVQs and vocational qualifications in areas such as IT, business, languages, teaching/training, administration and secretarial skills. It is also responsible for developing new specifications to meet national requirements and the needs of students and teachers. OCR is a not-for-profit organisation; any surplus made is invested back into the establishment to help towards the development of qualifications and support, which keep pace with the changing needs of today’s society. This mark scheme is published as an aid to teachers and students, to indicate the requirements of the examination. It shows the basis on which marks were awarded by examiners. It does not indicate the details of the discussions which took place at an examiners’ meeting before marking commenced. All examiners are instructed that alternative correct answers and unexpected approaches in candidates’ scripts must be given marks that fairly reflect the relevant knowledge and skills demonstrated. Mark schemes should be read in conjunction with the published question papers and the report on the examination. OCR will not enter into any discussion or correspondence in connection with this mark scheme. © OCR 2016 F393 Mark Scheme June 2016 Annotations used in the detailed Mark Scheme (to include abbreviations and subject-specific conventions) Annotation Meaning AO1 Related to Assessment Objective 1 AO2 Related to Assessment Objective 2 EVAL Evaluation of evidence ^ Omission IRRL Irrelevant material SEEN A section of text has been SEEN by an examiner Highlighter Examiner is drawing attention to a detail in an answer BP A blank page which the examiner has checked as such - Answers must be marked using the level descriptors in the marking grids and a mark awarded for each Assessment Objective. - The following points are indicative and offer question specific guidance. - They should not provide an exhaustive list and any relevant points should be credited. - The maximum mark for the paper is 100. - Use annotations above to indicate points in the scripts. 3 F393 Mark Scheme June 2016 Q Answer Marks Guidance Indicative Content Content Levels of Response 1 AO1 20 Marking grids to be used for response to the AO1 = 20 Answers should show a detailed knowledge of the Ionian specific question. In response to the question Level 5 18-20 Revolt, the events which led up to it and its conclusion. They [To what extent did lack of organisation Level 4 14-17 might include Aristagoras’ request for help from the Spartans among the Greek states lead to the failure of Level 3 9-13 and then the Athenians; the various disputes that arose the Ionian Revolt?]: Level 2 5-8 between the different parties in the Ionian states; the refusal Level 1 0 – 4 of Sparta to become involved in the Ionian Revolt; the burning Answers should provide: of Sardis, its aftermath and Darius’ response (including the - Specific factual knowledge and evidence ‘slave’ reminding him about the Athenians). Preparations for about the Ionian Revolt and the causes of the fighting in the Ionian Revolt, including the roles of its failure Aristagoras and Histiaeus; Cyprus and the discussions with - Detailed knowledge of the period the Ionians (Herodotus 5.109ff); relations between other - Partial coverage for level 3 Ionian states. Knowledge of the outcome of the Ionian Revolt, - Detailed knowledge of the relevant including the battle of Lade and the detail of the chaos at this sections of Herodotus as well as battle. Knowledge of Herodotus’ account of the establishment knowledge of Diodorus’ account of this of democracy in Ionia also should be credited. period AO2 30 The evaluation in the answer should be AO2 = 30 Candidates will need to discuss the extent to which lack of focused on the issues raised by the question Level 5 26-30 organisation amongst the Greek states led to the failure of ‘to what extent did lack of organisation Level 4 20-25 the Ionian revolt. They might include consideration of: among the Greek states lead to the failure of Level 3 14-19 - What is meant by lack of unity amongst the Greek states; the Ionian Revolt’, the nature of the sources Level 2 6-13 - In what senses (and whether) the Ionian Revolt failed; and the specific issue of the organisation of Level 1 0 – 5 - Discussion of other factors which led to the failure of the the Greek states led to the failure of the revolt – e.g. the role of key leaders in the revolt and its Ionian Revolt. Answers should include: outcome, Persian response or economic pressures in - A thorough analysis/balanced argument Ionia. about the nature of the sources and our - Whether Herodotus’ close connection with the Ionian ability to know about/understand the Greeks and his ability to understand their affairs in greater degree of organisation or lack thereof depth give us an accurate picture of the events; amongst the Ionians and other Greeks. - Whether Herodotus is reliable in his portrayal of these - Level 3 answers should present some events, and in particular whether he places too much attempt at interpretation and evaluation of emphasis on the relationships between leaders in his the sources in the terms outlined above. account of the Ionian Revolt. 4 F393 Mark Scheme June 2016 Q Answer Marks Guidance Indicative Content Content Levels of Response 2 AO1 20 Marking grids to be used for response to the Candidates should give a clear outline of Herodotus’ account specific question. In response to the question AO1 = 20 of the causes of the conflict between the Greeks and the [How far does Herodotus succeed in Level 5 18-20 Barbarians. explaining why the Greeks and the Persians Level 4 14-17 Key examples (from Herodotus, unless otherwise stated) came into conflict with one another?] answers Level 3 9-13 might include: should provide: Level 2 5-8 - The early mythical stories in book 1, including the mutual - Specific factual knowledge and evidence Level 1 0 – 4 woman-snatching; about the causes of the conflict between - The growth of the power of the Persian Empire, including the Greeks and the Persians the expansion into Egypt and the attempts on Scythia; - Detailed knowledge of the period - The early attempts by the Persians to look ‘for earth and - Partial coverage for level 3 water’ from the Greeks and their outcomes; - Detailed knowledge of the relevant - The Ionian Revolt and its role (according to Herodotus) in sections of Herodotus and his statements causing the Athenians to take hostile action against the of his aims. Persians; - Knowledge of relevant Persian - The Persian desire for revenge against the Athenians; inscriptions. - The view of the Persian king and his desire for the expansion of the empire as reflected in Persian inscriptions. - The opening of Book seven: the various conversations which Xerxes had, and the role of dreams in encouraging him to act. AO2 Candidates should consider carefully the question of ‘how far’ 30 The evaluation in the answer should be AO2 = 30 Herodotus succeeded in his stated aim of giving an account focused on the issues raised by the question Level 5 26-30 of the causes of the conflict. They should present a well- ‘how far’, the nature of the sources and the Level 4 20-25 argued case, which might include some of the following: specific issue of his presentation of the Level 3 14-19 - Does Herodotus focus too much on the idea of revenge? causes of the conflict between the Greeks Level 2 6-13 - Is there too much emphasis on the role of individuals in and the Barbarians. Answers should include: Level 1 0 – 5 Herodotus’ account (e.g. Histiaeus, Aristagoras, Darius, - A thorough analysis/balanced argument Xerxes, Hippias, Mardonius)? about the nature of Herodotus’ - Does Herodotus underplay the significance of internal presentation of the causes of conflict politics in Ionia, Athens and Sparta? and his aims. 5 F393 Mark Scheme June 2016 Q Answer Marks Guidance Indicative Content Content Levels of Response - Does Herodotus fail to understand the growth of the - Level 3 answers should present some Persian Empire and the need for a king to conquer new attempt at interpretation and evaluation territory? of the sources in the terms outlined - To what extent did Herodotus have access to the court above. records and thinking of those in power in Persia? 6 F393 Mark Scheme June 2016 Q Answer Marks Guidance Indicative Content Content Levels of Response 3 AO1 20 Marking grids to be used for response to the Answers should give details of the key individuals and their specific question. In response to the question AO1 = 20 abilities as presented in the sources. These might include the [‘The strengths and abilities of individual Greek Level 5 18-20 following: leaders ensured that the Persians were Level 4 14-17 - The strengths and abilities of Miltiades and Callimachus defeated.’ To what extent do the sources Level 3 9-13 at the battle of Marathon. support this view of the outcome of the conflict Level 2 5-8 - The heroism of Leonidas and the Spartans; between Greece and Persia in this period?] Level 1 0 – 4 - The strengths and abilities of Themistocles at the battle of answers should provide: Salamis as presented by Herodotus and Aeschylus, in - Specific factual knowledge and evidence particular his tricking the Persians into battle; about the role of key individuals in the - Eurybiades’ role at Artemisium and Salamis; conflict.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Fleet of Syracuse (480-413 BCE)
    ANDREAS MORAKIS The Fleet of Syracuse (480-413 BCE) The Deinomenids The ancient sources make no reference to the fleet of Syracuse until the be- ginning of the 5th century BCE. In particular, Thucydides, when considering the Greek maritime powers at the time of the rise of the Athenian empire, includes among them the tyrants of Sicily1. Other sources refer more precisely to Gelon’s fleet, during the Carthaginian invasion in Sicily. Herodotus, when the Greeks en- voys asked for Gelon’s help to face Xerxes’ attack, mentions the lord of Syracuse promising to provide, amongst other things, 200 triremes in return of the com- mand of the Greek forces2. The same number of ships is also mentioned by Ti- maeus3 and Ephorus4. It is very odd, though, that we hear nothing of this fleet during the Carthaginian campaign and the Battle of Himera in either the narration of Diodorus, or the briefer one of Herodotus5. Nevertheless, other sources imply some kind of naval fighting in Himera. Pausanias saw offerings from Gelon and the Syracusans taken from the Phoenicians in either a sea or a land battle6. In addition, the Scholiast to the first Pythian of Pindar, in two different situations – the second one being from Ephorus – says that Gelon destroyed the Carthaginians in a sea battle when they attacked Sicily7. 1 Thuc. I 14, 2: ὀλίγον τε πρὸ τῶν Μηδικῶν καὶ τοῦ ∆αρείου θανάτου … τριήρεις περί τε Σικελίαν τοῖς τυράννοις ἐς πλῆθος ἐγένοντο καὶ Κερκυραίοις. 2 Hdt. VII 158. 3 Timae. FGrHist 566 F94= Polyb. XII 26b, 1-5, but the set is not the court of Gelon, but the conference of the mainland Greeks in Corinth.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient History Sourcebook: 11Th Brittanica: Sparta SPARTA an Ancient City in Greece, the Capital of Laconia and the Most Powerful State of the Peloponnese
    Ancient History Sourcebook: 11th Brittanica: Sparta SPARTA AN ancient city in Greece, the capital of Laconia and the most powerful state of the Peloponnese. The city lay at the northern end of the central Laconian plain, on the right bank of the river Eurotas, a little south of the point where it is joined by its largest tributary, the Oenus (mount Kelefina). The site is admirably fitted by nature to guard the only routes by which an army can penetrate Laconia from the land side, the Oenus and Eurotas valleys leading from Arcadia, its northern neighbour, and the Langada Pass over Mt Taygetus connecting Laconia and Messenia. At the same time its distance from the sea-Sparta is 27 m. from its seaport, Gythium, made it invulnerable to a maritime attack. I.-HISTORY Prehistoric Period.-Tradition relates that Sparta was founded by Lacedaemon, son of Zeus and Taygete, who called the city after the name of his wife, the daughter of Eurotas. But Amyclae and Therapne (Therapnae) seem to have been in early times of greater importance than Sparta, the former a Minyan foundation a few miles to the south of Sparta, the latter probably the Achaean capital of Laconia and the seat of Menelaus, Agamemnon's younger brother. Eighty years after the Trojan War, according to the traditional chronology, the Dorian migration took place. A band of Dorians united with a body of Aetolians to cross the Corinthian Gulf and invade the Peloponnese from the northwest. The Aetolians settled in Elis, the Dorians pushed up to the headwaters of the Alpheus, where they divided into two forces, one of which under Cresphontes invaded and later subdued Messenia, while the other, led by Aristodemus or, according to another version, by his twin sons Eurysthenes and Procles, made its way down the Eurotas were new settlements were formed and gained Sparta, which became the Dorian capital of Laconia.
    [Show full text]
  • A-Level Classical Civilisation Mark Scheme Unit
    AS-LEVEL Classical Civilisation CIV2D Athenian Imperialism Mark scheme 2020 June 2015 Version 1.0 Final Mark Scheme Mark schemes are prepared by the Lead Assessment Writer and considered, together with the relevant questions, by a panel of subject teachers. This mark scheme includes any amendments made at the standardisation events which all associates participate in and is the scheme which was used by them in this examination. The standardisation process ensures that the mark scheme covers the students’ responses to questions and that every associate understands and applies it in the same correct way. As preparation for standardisation each associate analyses a number of students’ scripts. Alternative answers not already covered by the mark scheme are discussed and legislated for. If, after the standardisation process, associates encounter unusual answers which have not been raised they are required to refer these to the Lead Assessment Writer. It must be stressed that a mark scheme is a working document, in many cases further developed and expanded on the basis of students’ reactions to a particular paper. Assumptions about future mark schemes on the basis of one year’s document should be avoided; whilst the guiding principles of assessment remain constant, details will change, depending on the content of a particular examination paper. Further copies of this mark scheme are available from aqa.org.uk Copyright © 2015 AQA and its licensors. All rights reserved. AQA retains the copyright on all its publications. However, registered schools/colleges for AQA are permitted to copy material from this booklet for their own internal use, with the following important exception: AQA cannot give permission to schools/colleges to photocopy any material that is acknowledged to a third party even for internal use within the centre.
    [Show full text]
  • Thucydides, Sicily, and the Defeat of Athens Tim Rood
    Thucydides, Sicily, and the Defeat of Athens Tim Rood To cite this version: Tim Rood. Thucydides, Sicily, and the Defeat of Athens. KTÈMA Civilisations de l’Orient, de la Grèce et de Rome antiques, Université de Strasbourg, 2017, 42, pp.19-39. halshs-01670082 HAL Id: halshs-01670082 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01670082 Submitted on 21 Dec 2017 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Les interprétations de la défaite de 404 Edith Foster Interpretations of Athen’s defeat in the Peloponnesian war ............................................................. 7 Edmond LÉVY Thucydide, le premier interprète d’une défaite anormale ................................................................. 9 Tim Rood Thucydides, Sicily, and the Defeat of Athens ...................................................................................... 19 Cinzia Bearzot La συμφορά de la cité La défaite d’Athènes (405-404 av. J.-C.) chez les orateurs attiques .................................................. 41 Michel Humm Rome, une « cité grecque
    [Show full text]
  • The Experience of Battle in the Sicilian Expedition: from the Great Harbour to the River Assinarus
    Western University Scholarship@Western Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository 4-22-2013 12:00 AM The Experience of Battle in the Sicilian Expedition: From the Great Harbour to the River Assinarus Frank D. D'Earmo The University of Western Ontario Supervisor Dr. Bernd Steinbock The University of Western Ontario Graduate Program in Classics A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree in Master of Arts © Frank D. D'Earmo 2013 Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd Part of the Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons Recommended Citation D'Earmo, Frank D., "The Experience of Battle in the Sicilian Expedition: From the Great Harbour to the River Assinarus" (2013). Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository. 1231. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/1231 This Dissertation/Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Western. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Western. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE EXPERIENCE OF BATTLE IN THE SICILIAN EXPEDITION: FROM THE GREAT HARBOUR TO THE RIVER ASSINARUS Monograph by Frank D’Earmo Graduate Program in Classical Studies A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts The School of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies The University of Western Ontario London, Ontario, Canada © Frank D’Earmo 2013 Abstract Drawing on John Keegan’s Face of Battle approach, this MA thesis reconstructs the soldiers’ experience during the final phase of the Athenians’ Sicilian Expedition (415- 413 BC).
    [Show full text]
  • Nicias and the Sicilian Expedition
    Copyright © Heritage History 2010 Some rights reserved This text was produced and distributed by Heritage History, an organization dedicated to the preservation of classical juvenile history books, and to the promotion of the works of traditional history authors. The books which Heritage History republishes are in the public domain and are no longer protected by the original copyright. They may therefore be reproduced within the United States without paying a royalty to the author. The text and pictures used to produce this version of the work, PREFACE however, are the property of Heritage History and are subject to certain restrictions. These restrictions are imposed for the purpose of protecting the integrity of the work, for preventing plagiarism, and for helping to The ultimate, it might be said, the only authority for assure that compromised versions of the work are not widely the military and political facts given in this narrative, is disseminated. Thucydides. These facts have been admirably expounded In order to preserve information regarding the origin of this and arranged by Grote, to whom everyone interested in text, a copyright by the author, and a Heritage History distribution date Greek history must be under obligations which cannot be are included at the foot of every page of text. We require all electronic adequately expressed. I have to acknowledge specially my and printed versions of this text to include these markings, and that indebtedness to the maps which accompany the sixth users adhere to the following restrictions. volume of his history. In writing this little book I have also 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Marinatos a Note on the Theiasmos
    A NOTE ON THE THEIASMOS OF NICIAS IN THUCYDIDES By Nanno Marinatos Summary: Thucydides criticises Nicias for being too partial to divination (7.50.4). It is suggested here through the examination of the linguistic nuances of θειασμός and the verb προσκείμενος, that Thucydides assessed him negatively primarily because he took the side of the army-seers. Yet, this criticism ought not to be blown out of proportion. Thucydides’ portrait differs significantly from Plutarch’s who describes Nicias as a diffi- dent man easily gripped by fear and addicted to prophecies. Consequently, Thucydides’ criticism is a small parenthesis in his overall presentation of the Athenian general’s ca- reer whose decisions were based on skill, rational criteria and experience (5.16.1). καὶ ὁ Νικίας (ἦν γάρ τι καὶ ἄγαν θειασμῷ τε καὶ τῷ τοιούτῳ προσκείμενος) οὐδ᾽ ἂν διαβουλεύσασθαι ἔτι ἔφη πρίν, ὡς οἱ μάντεις ἐξηγοῦντο, τρὶς ἐννέα ἡμέρας μεῖναι, ὅπως ἂν πρότερον κινηθείη (Thuc. 7.50.4). And Nicias (who was a bit too partial to theiasmos and the like), said he would not consider moving before they stayed still for three times nine days as the seers advised. In this often-cited passage, Thucydides is clearly somewhat critical of Ni- cias. The purpose of this note is to assess the nuances of his reproach by examining the broader context of the passage and the connection be- tween theiasmos and the verb πρόσκειμαι. It will be argued that Nicias is not criticized because of his personal theological beliefs but because of his softness towards the seers, the ones who undertook to interpret the divine will.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Background 3 Approach 3 Ancient Sources 4 the Athenian
    Winchester 2 Table of Contents Chapter One: Historical Background 3 ● Approach 3 ● Ancient sources 4 ● The Athenian commanders 7 a. Alcibiades 7 b. Nicias 9 c. Lamachus 10 ● The Spartan commanders 11 a. Gylippus 11 Chapter Two: Background on governmental customs and military customs 12 ● Athens 12 ● Sparta 15 ● Sicily 17 Chapter Three: The Sicilian Expedition 19 ● Thucydides’ perspective as an Athenian 19 ● Athens: The conflict between the generals and the Assembly 19 ● Maps of Sicily and the Greek world 24 ● Sicily: The consequences of division and confusion 25 ● The Syracusan side of the war 28 Chapter Four: Analysis 32 ● Consequences of Athenian and Spartan political systems 32 ● Conclusion: Alcibiades and Athens 35 Appendix: Chronology of the Sicilian Expedition 37 Bibliography 38 Winchester 3 Chapter One: Historical Background Approach In this thesis, I will examine the dynamics of power between the Athenian assembly and the three generals assigned to positions of command in the Sicilian Expedition – Alcibiades, Nicias, and Lamachus – and attempt to contextualize Alcibiades’ defecting from Athens to Sparta. I focus on the Sicilian Expedition narrative in Thucydides’ History of the Peloponnesian War Books 6 and 7, but also use Plutarch’s Life of Alcibiades and Life of Nicias, plus the Life of Coriolanus. In the first chapter, after discussing the sources, I examine the personal history of the commanders involved (the Athenians Alcibiades, Lamachus, and Nicias, and the Spartan Gylippus). In my second chapter, I then turn to the governmental structures and military customs of Athens, Sparta, and Sicily, zeroing in on the Athenian Assembly and its military role.
    [Show full text]
  • Battles of Carthage Versus Syracuse, 480-276 B.C. Module Design by Daniel A
    Tyrant Alexander Deluxe Module tyrant Battles of Carthage versus Syracuse, 480-276 B.C. Module Design by Daniel A. Fournie GBoH Series Editor of C3i Magazine T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S INTRODUCTION ....................................................... 2 CRIMISSOS RIVER, 341 B.C. ................................... 19 GENERAL INFORMATION ...................................... 3 ABOLUS RIVER, 338 B.C. ........................................ 23 TYRANT MODULE SPECIAL RULES..................... 3 MOUNT ECNOMUS, 311 B.C. .................................. 25 HIMERA, 480 B.C. ..................................................... 4 WHITE TUNIS, 310 B.C. ............................................ 27 SECOND HIMERA, 409 B.C. .................................... 7 TUNIS, 307 B.C. ......................................................... 29 AKRAGAS, 406 B.C. .................................................. 9 LILYBAEUM, 276 B.C. .............................................. 32 GELA, 405 B.C............................................................ 12 Epilogue ....................................................................... 35 CABALA, 377 B.C. ..................................................... 14 Credits .......................................................................... 35 CRONIUM, 376 B.C. .................................................. 17 Sources ......................................................................... 36 GMT GAMES P.O. Box 1308, Hanford, CA 93232-1308 www.GMTGames.com Contains Simple GBoH Versions!
    [Show full text]
  • Greek in Early Hellenistic Magna Graecia: Dialect Contact and Change in South Italy
    Greek in Early Hellenistic Magna Graecia: Dialect Contact and Change in South Italy Livia Tagliapietra St John’s College, Cambridge This dissertation is submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy January 2018 Greek in Early Hellenistic Magna Graecia: Dialect Contact and Change in South Italy Livia Tagliapietra Summary This doctoral thesis investigates dialect contact, identity and change in the ancient Greek colonies of Magna Graecia in the fourth and third centuries BC, as evidenced in the surviving epigraphic sources. South Italy is an area of the ancient Greek-speaking world in which a comprehensive investigation of the linguistic evidence has not previously been attempted. By considering linguistic questions within their broader socio-historical environment, I propose a radical redrawing of the dialect map of this area. I first present the historical context, the linguistic evidence and the methodological framework of my research in the introduction. In the first chapter I reject previous hypotheses about dialect contact in South Italy around 300 BC on the basis of both historical and linguistic arguments. I then propose a new and empirically better supported explanation for the development of the ‘severior’ long- vowel system in the dialect of the southern city of Locri, which previous studies have generally attributed to influence from the dialect of the important northern city of Taras and taken as evidence for Taras’ linguistic influence over the rest of Magna Graecia, and possibly also for the existence of a local Doric koina (i.e. a common dialect). In the second chapter I offer a new analysis of the inscriptional record from Locri and show that, in the absence of compelling evidence for influence from the dialect of Taras, a high level of prestige remained attributed to the traditional local dialect until at least the mid-third century.
    [Show full text]
  • The Military and Political Role of the Allies of Sparta in the Peloponnesian War
    THE MILITARY AND POLITICAL ROLE OF THE ALLIES OF SPARTA IN THE PELOPONNESIAN WAR BY PANAYIOTIS KATSIVARDELOS Thesis Presented for the Degree of the Master of Letters GLASGOW 1992 © Panayiotis Katsivardelos 1992 ProQuest Number: 13815419 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 13815419 Published by ProQuest LLC(2018). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States C ode Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 GLASGOW UNIVERSITY LIBRARY PARENTIBUS CARISSIMIS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to express my gratitude to my supervisor Dr. Knox for his understanding, cooperation, constructive criticism and especially for drawing my attention to numerous points throughout this work. Special thanks to Prof. MacDowell whose influences have helped in various direct and indirect ways. I owe particular debts of gratitude to my family, for their moral support and constant encouragement during all these years. Finally I would like to extend my thanks to my colleagues and friends in Glasgow, for their contribution which aided me in improving parts throughout my work and especially to C. Arvanitis & A. Fragos. I would also like to extend my sincere appreciation to J.
    [Show full text]
  • An Island Too Far (The Athenian Expedition to Sicily, 415 B.C.)
    An island too far (The Athenian expedition to Sicily, 415 B.C.) Prologue A bridge too far is the title of a book of the journalist and writer Cornelius Ryan(1920- 1974). It reports Allies’ failed attempt to enter Germany through the Netherlands during the WW II. The bridge mentioned in the title is Arnhem bridge, reached but not conquered by the allied paratroopers. This failure compromised the whole operation, coded as Market- Garden . But in English, A bridge too far has got also a different meaning. According to the Oxford Dictionary, it means “ A step or act that is regarded as being too drastic to take ” or “Something that is very difficult to achieve ”. And the act taken by the army and the navy of a Great Power many centuries before Market-Garden , in 415 B.C, is very similar to “ an act that is regarded as being too drastic to take ”. If Cornelius Ryan had lived in 415 B.C., he would have titled his own work, “ An island too far ”, alluding, from one side, to a real island, and, from the other side, to the gamble connected with the fact of bringing the war thousands kilometres far from the homeland. Sicily is that real island; Athens and the Athenians are those who made the gamble. Segesta’s lies. After the so-called “Peace of Nikias”( 421 B.C.) that ends the Peloponnesian War temporally, Athens, having its hands free, cultivates the idea of expanding westwards, towards Sicily. Some years before(427 B.C), Athens had tried to do it, but its intervention in favour of the town of Leontini ( today Lentini) had failed.
    [Show full text]