1. Einleitung

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

1. Einleitung View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Hochschulschriftenserver - Universität Frankfurt am Main INHALT 1. EINLEITUNG ........................................................................................................................................................ 1 2. DESKRIPTIVITÄT UND VERWANDTE KONZEPTE ................................................................................... 2 2.1. ANNÄHERUNG AN DEN BEGRIFF: ENTWICKLUNG EINER ARBEITSDEFINITION ..... 2 2.1.1. EIN ÜBERBLICK ÜBER DEN BEGRIFF IN DER LITERATUR ............................................................ 2 2.1.1.1. Amerikanistik: Sapir, Mithun. ...................................................................................................... 2 2.1.1.2. Indogermanistik: Gamkrelidze & Ivanov ..................................................................................... 4 2.1.1.3. Ethnobiologie / linguistische Anthropologie: Berlin, Brown ....................................................... 4 2.1.2. ARBEITSDEFINITION ......................................................................................................................... 5 2.2. „DESKRIPTIVITÄT“ IN ANDEREN ZUSAMMENHÄNGEN ...................................................... 6 2.3. DESKRIPTIVITÄT IN DER SEILERSCHEN TRADITION ........................................................... 6 2.3.1. DER DESKRIPTIVITÄTSBEGRIFF VON SEILER (1975) ................................................................... 6 2.3.2. DAS MESSEN VON DESKRIPTIVITÄT : ULTAN (1975, 1976); MOSHINSKY (1976) .................... 8 2.4. VERWANDTE KONZEPTE ................................................................................................................. 9 2.4.1.A RBITRARITÄT UND RELATIVE MOTIVIERTHEIT DES SPRACHLICHEN ZEICHENS ...................... 9 2.4.2. TRANSPARENZ UND OPAZITÄT ..................................................................................................... 10 2.4.3. KOMPOSITIONALITÄT UND FORM -BEDEUTUNGS -ISOMORPHISMUS ......................................... 10 2.4.4. ABWEICHUNGEN VOM KOMPOSITIONALITÄTSPRINZIP : SEMANTISCHE LEXIKALISIERUNG UND IDIOMATISIERUNG ................................................................................................................. 11 2.4.5. METAPHORIK , METONYMIE UND KONZEPTUALISIERUNG – KOGNITIVE ASPEKTE ................ 14 2.4.6. DER ZUSAMMENHANG ZUR LEXIKONORGANISATION UND LEXIKONERWEITERUNG ............ 17 2.5. ABGRENZUNGSPROBLEME ........................................................................................................... 18 2.5.1. DESKRIPTIVITÄT VS . ONOMATOPOIIE .......................................................................................... 18 2.5.2. DESKRIPTIVITÄT VS . POLYSEMIE ................................................................................................. 19 2.5.3. DESKRIPTIVITÄT UND DERIVATION ............................................................................................. 20 2.6. VORSCHLAG EINER DEFINITION ................................................................................................ 22 2.7. TYPOLOGIE DESKRIPTIVER AUSDRÜCKE ............................................................................... 24 2.7.1. FORMAL ........................................................................................................................................... 24 2.7.2. FUNKTIONAL ................................................................................................................................... 26 2.8. DAS MESSEN DES DESKRIPTIVITÄTSGRADS EINER SPRACHE ....................................... 26 2.8.1. AUSWAHL DER ZU UNTERSUCHENDEN SPRACHEN ..................................................................... 27 2.8.2.G RUNDWORTSCHATZ ...................................................................................................................... 27 2.8.2.1. Festsetzung der zu ermittelnden Formen ................................................................................... 27 2.8.2.2. Vorgehensweise bei der Ermittlung der Daten .......................................................................... 28 2.8.2.3. Methodische Probleme bei der Zuweisung des Deskriptivitätsstatus ........................................ 30 2.8.2.3.1. Semantische Lexikalisierung……………………………………………………………………30 2.8.2.3.2. Produktivität….. ................................................................................................................ 31 2.8.2.3.3. Fehlen freier zugrundeliegender lexikalischer Einheiten…... ........................................... 31 2.8.2.3.4. Weitere kleinere Fragen…… ............................................................................................. 32 2.8.2.4. Ergebnisse .................................................................................................................................. 32 2.8.3. TEXTFREQUENZ .............................................................................................................................. 33 2.8.3.1. Verwendete Texte ....................................................................................................................... 33 2.8.3.2. Methodisches ............................................................................................................................. 34 2.8.3.2.1. Type- /Token-Unterscheidung…… ..................................................................................... 34 2.8.3.2.2. Polysynthetische Probleme…… ......................................................................................... 35 2.8.3.3. Ergebnisse .................................................................................................................................. 37 2.8.5. AUSWERTUNG ................................................................................................................................. 38 3. DESKRIPTIVITÄT ALS VARIABLE DES SPRACHWANDELS ................................................................ 39 3.1. RELEVANTE SPRACHWANDELPROZESSE AUS THEORETISCHER SICHT .................... 39 3.1.1. LEXIKALISIERUNG .......................................................................................................................... 39 3.1.1.1. Ein Überblick über den Begriff .................................................................................................. 39 3.1.1.2. Lexikalisierung in der historischen Linguistik ........................................................................... 40 3.1.1.2.1. Reguläre Wortbildungsprozesse als Lexikalisierung. ........................................................ 40 3.1.1.2.2. Lexikalisierung als Nichvorhersagbarkeit eines Lexems nach allgemeinen Regeln .......... 41 3.1.1.2.3. Lexikalisierung als Demorphologisierung und Demotivation ............................................ 42 3.1.2. SPRACHKONTAKT : LEHNWÖRTER , LEHNÜBERSETZUNGEN , SUBSTRATEINFLUSS .................. 43 3.1.3. VOLKSETYMOLOGIE ....................................................................................................................... 45 3.1.4. KULTURELLE GRÜNDE ................................................................................................................... 45 3.1.5. SPRACHINTERNE GRÜNDE / TYPOLOGICAL SHIFTS ..................................................................... 46 3.2. PRAKTISCHE ANWENDUNG .......................................................................................................... 47 3.2.1. WEGEN MANGELNDER DATEN NICHT WEITER UNTERSUCHBARE FÄLLE ................................. 47 3.2.2. SICH NEUTRAL VERHALTENDE FÄLLE ......................................................................................... 47 3.2.3. DESKRIPTIVITÄT DEZIMIERENDE PROZESSE ............................................................................... 47 3.2.3.1. Onomasiologischer Wandel ....................................................................................................... 47 3.2.3.2. Entlehnung, Sprachkontakt ........................................................................................................ 48 3.2.3.3. Ausfall der Ableitungstechnik oder des zugrundeliegenden Lexems .......................................... 48 3.2.3.4. Lexikalisierung ........................................................................................................................... 48 3.2.4. DESKRIPTIVITÄT GENERIERENDE PROZESSE ............................................................................... 50 3.2.4.1. Onomasiologischer Wandel ....................................................................................................... 50 3.2.4.2. Explizitheitsmaximierung ........................................................................................................... 50 3.2.5. GESAMTENTWICKLUNG ................................................................................................................. 50 4. EXKURS ............................................................................................................................................................... 51 4.1. DESKRIPTIVITÄT UND LEXIKALISIERUNG IN DER TOPONYMIE ................................... 51 4.2. DESKRIPTIVITÄT UND LEXIKALISIERUNG BEI DER GENESE VON KREOLSPRACHEN ..................................................................................................................................... 51 5. ZUSAMMENFASSUNG UND AUSBLICK – UNIVERSALE
Recommended publications
  • A World Revealed by Language: a New Seri Dictionary and Unapologetic Speculations on Seri Indian Deep History
    A World Revealed by Language: A New Seri Dictionary and Unapologetic Speculations on Seri Indian Deep History JIM HILLS AND DAVID YETMAN Comcáac quih Yaza quih Hant Ihíip hac: Diccionario Seri-Español- Ingles, compiled by Mary Beck Moser and Stephen A. Marlett. Illustrated by Cathy Moser Marlett. Published by Plaza y Valdés Editores, Mexico City. 947 pages. ISBN: 970–722–453–3. The philosopher Ludwig Wittgenstein once mentioned that to imagine a language was to imagine a form of life (Wittgenstein 1953: 19). A comprehensive dictionary of any language exemplifies Wittgenstein’s point, but none more than the trilingual dictionary of the Seri language compiled by Mary Beck Moser and Steven Marlett. The work represents more than fifty years of research and over thirty years of living with the Seris in El Desemboque, Sonora, Mexico, in connection with the Summer Institute of Linguistics of the Wycliffe Bible Translators. The entries are in Seri, Spanish, and English, making the work of value to speakers of all three languages. The roughly six hundred Seris are already using the dictionary. Outsiders visiting them would be well advised to use it as well. The authors included Seri consultants at every step of the compilation. Seris reviewed the entries, suggesting changes and additions. Part of the dictionary’s usefulness lies in its incorporation not merely of single-word or phrase translations, but also of sentences or short paragraphs typically generated by Seris. This is critically important, since meanings are frequently so complex that a simple word-by-word translation simply will not do. As Moser and Marlett have realized, JIM HILLS is a longtime Seri hand and trader in Tucson, Arizona.
    [Show full text]
  • Sonny Bono Salton Sea National Wildlife Refuge Complex
    Appendix J Cultural Setting - Sonny Bono Salton Sea National Wildlife Refuge Complex Appendix J: Cultural Setting - Sonny Bono Salton Sea National Wildlife Refuge Complex The following sections describe the cultural setting in and around the two refuges that constitute the Sonny Bono Salton Sea National Wildlife Refuge Complex (NWRC) - Sonny Bono Salton Sea NWR and Coachella Valley NWR. The cultural resources associated with these Refuges may include archaeological and historic sites, buildings, structures, and/or objects. Both the Imperial Valley and the Coachella Valley contain rich archaeological records. Some portions of the Sonny Bono Salton Sea NWRC have previously been inventoried for cultural resources, while substantial additional areas have not yet been examined. Seventy-seven prehistoric and historic sites, features, or isolated finds have been documented on or within a 0.5- mile buffer of the Sonny Bono Salton Sea NWR and Coachella Valley NWR. Cultural History The outline of Colorado Desert culture history largely follows a summary by Jerry Schaefer (2006). It is founded on the pioneering work of Malcolm J. Rogers in many parts of the Colorado and Sonoran deserts (Rogers 1939, Rogers 1945, Rogers 1966). Since then, several overviews and syntheses have been prepared, with each succeeding effort drawing on the previous studies and adding new data and interpretations (Crabtree 1981, Schaefer 1994a, Schaefer and Laylander 2007, Wallace 1962, Warren 1984, Wilke 1976). The information presented here was compiled by ASM Affiliates in 2009 for the Service as part of Cultural Resources Review for the Sonny Bono Salton Sea NWRC. Four successive periods, each with distinctive cultural patterns, may be defined for the prehistoric Colorado Desert, extending back in time over a period of at least 12,000 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring the Function of Lake Cahuilla Fish Traps
    UC Merced Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology Title Fish Traps on Ancient Shores: Exploring the Function of Lake Cahuilla Fish Traps Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1hk9f8px Journal Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology, 29(2) ISSN 0191-3557 Authors White, Eric S. Roth, Barbara J. Publication Date 2009 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology | Vol. 29, No. 2 (2009) | pp. 183–193 REPORT Fish Traps on Ancient Shores: California and occupied the Salton Trough. Today’s Salton Sea occupies the same geographic location, but is Exploring the Function of much smaller (Fig. 1). The lake formed when the deltaic Lake Cahuilla Fish Traps activity of the Colorado River caused a shift in its course, causing it to flow northward into the Salton Trough ERIC S. WHITE and creating a large freshwater lake. Lake Cahuilla was K6-75, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, six times the size of the Salton Sea, measuring at its PO Box 999, Richland, WA 99352 maximum 180 km. in length and 50 km. in width, making Barbara J. Roth it one of the largest Holocene lakes in western North Department of Anthropology, University of Las Vegas, Las Vegas, Nevada 89154-5003 America. The Colorado Desert is one of the most arid regions in the West, so the presence of a large freshwater This paper examines the use of V-style fish traps on the lake would have been a significant environmental feature western recessional shorelines of ancient Lake Cahuilla.
    [Show full text]
  • The Salton Sea California's Overlooked Treasure
    THE SALTON SEA CALIFORNIA'S OVERLOOKED TREASURE by Pat Laflin Canoeing off Date Palm Beach, Salton Sea TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I BEFORE THE PRESENT SEA Page Chapter 1 The Salton Sea-Its Beginnings 3 Chatpter 2 Lost Ships of the Desert 9 Chapter 3 The Salt Works 11 Chapter 4 Creating the Oasis 13 Chapter 5 The Imperial Valley is Born 17 Chapter 6 A Runaway River 21 PART II LIVING WITH THE SEA Chapter 7 Remembering the Salton Sea's First 31 Years Chapter 8 Mudpots, Geysers and Mullet Island 33 Chapter 9 Sea of Dreams 37 Chapter 10 Speedboats in the Desert 45 Chapter 11 Fishing the Salton Sea 51 Chapter 12 Where Barnacles Grow on the 53 Sage PART III WHAT ABOUT THE FUTURE? Chapter 13 Restoring the Salton Sea 57 Bibliography 58 Postscript 59 THE SALTON SEA CALIFORNIA'S OVERLOOKED TREASURE PART I BEFORE THE PRESENT SEA Chapter 1 THE SALTON SEA -- ITS BEGINNINGS The story of the Salton begins with the formation of a great shallow depression, or basin which modem explorers have called the Salton Sink. Several million years ago a long arm of the Pacific Ocean extended from the Gulf of California though the present Imperial and Coachella valleys, then northwesterly through the Sacramento and San Joaquin valleys. Mountain ranges rose on either side of this great inland sea, and the whole area came up out of the water. Oyster beds in the San Felipe Mountains, on the west side of Imperial Valley are located many hundreds of feet above present sea level.
    [Show full text]
  • SANDSTONE FEATURES ADJACENT to LAKE CAHUILLA Stephanie
    SANDSTONE FEATURES ADJACENT TO LAKE CAHUILLA and Stephanie Rose and Cheryl Bowden-Renna the KEA Environmental, Inc. surr 1420 Kettner Blvd, Ste. 620 qu ie San Diego, CA 92101 insic two arc~ the ABSTRACT and that Recent investigations at the Salton Sea Test Base revealed a number of features, including 110 this hearths or fire-affected rock clusters, 22 fish traps, and 198 rock enclosures. All of these features are located at very low elevations, ranging from 20 to 225 feet below sea level. Excavations in and around these features provided information on their structure and composition, as well as their possible function. as Ie Although little was recovered from the hearths and fish traps, units excavated at the rock enclosures ft le\ contained fish bone, sometimes in substantial quantities. OCCl was bo n ~ INTRODUCTION together at 16 sites, and a single site consisted of lake a hearth feature with no visible associated cultural Investigations at Salton Sea Test Base material. Subsurface examinations were (S STB) , on the west side of the Salton Sea, conducted in 40 hearths. Only about 30% of recorded 170 archaeological sites. These sites these had positive results, generally consisting of contained a total of 336 prehistoric features, a thin layer of charcoal flecks and a small amount of including 110 hearths, 22 rock constructions fish bone. Little additional cultural material was foun interpreted as fish traps, and 198 sandstone rock recovered subsurface. of tl­ enclosures. Subsurface data were provided by east. 135 shovel test pits and 25 units, placed at 159 of featL the features.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Linkchapter
    Index [Italic page numbers indicate major references] Abajo Mountains, 382, 388 Amargosa River, 285, 309, 311, 322, Arkansas River, 443, 456, 461, 515, Abort Lake, 283 337, 341, 342 516, 521, 540, 541, 550, 556, Abies, 21, 25 Amarillo, Texas, 482 559, 560, 561 Abra, 587 Amarillo-Wichita uplift, 504, 507, Arkansas River valley, 512, 531, 540 Absaroka Range, 409 508 Arlington volcanic field, 358 Acer, 21, 23, 24 Amasas Back, 387 Aromas dune field, 181 Acoma-Zuni scction, 374, 379, 391 Ambrose tenace, 522, 523 Aromas Red Sand, 180 stream evolution patterns, 391 Ambrosia, 21, 24 Arroyo Colorado, 395 Aden Crater, 368 American Falls Lava Beds, 275, 276 Arroyo Seco unit, 176 Afton Canyon, 334, 341 American Falls Reservoir, 275, 276 Artemisia, 21, 24 Afton interglacial age, 29 American River, 36, 165, 173 Ascension Parish, Louisana, 567 aggradation, 167, 176, 182, 226, 237, amino acid ash, 81, 118, 134, 244, 430 323, 336, 355, 357, 390, 413, geochronology, 65, 68 basaltic, 85 443, 451, 552, 613 ratios, 65 beds, 127,129 glaciofluvial, 423 aminostratigraphy, 66 clays, 451 Piedmont, 345 Amity area, 162 clouds, 95 aggregate, 181 Anadara, 587 flows, 75, 121 discharge, 277 Anastasia Formation, 602, 642, 647 layer, 10, 117 Agua Fria Peak area, 489 Anastasia Island, 602 rhyolitic, 170 Agua Fria River, 357 Anchor Silt, 188, 198, 199 volcanic, 54, 85, 98, 117, 129, Airport bench, 421, 423 Anderson coal, 448 243, 276, 295, 396, 409, 412, Alabama coastal plain, 594 Anderson Pond, 617, 618 509, 520 Alamosa Basin, 366 andesite, 75, 80, 489 Ash Flat, 364 Alamosa
    [Show full text]
  • The California Deserts: an Ecological Rediscovery
    3Pavlik-Ch1 10/9/07 6:43 PM Page 15 Rediscovery Copyrighted Material 3Pavlik-Ch1 10/9/07 6:43 PM Page 16 Copyrighted Material 3Pavlik-Ch1 10/9/07 6:43 PM Page 17 Indians first observed the organisms, processes, and history of California deserts. Over millennia, native people obtained knowledge both practical and esoteric, necessitated by survival in a land of extremes and accumulated by active minds recording how nature worked. Such knowledge became tradition when passed across generations, allowing cul- tural adjustments to the changing environment. The depth and breadth of their under- standing can only be glimpsed or imagined, but should never be minimized. Indians lived within deserts, were born, fed, and raised on them, su¤ered the extremes and uncertainties, and passed into the ancient, stony soils. Theirs was a discovery so intimate and spiritual, so singular, that we can only commemorate it with our own 10,000-year-long rediscov- ery of this place and all of its remarkable inhabitants. Our rediscovery has only begun. Our rediscovery is not based upon living in the deserts, despite a current human pop- ulation of over one million who dwelling east of the Sierra. We do not exist within the ecological context of the land. We are not dependant upon food webs of native plants and [Plate 13] Aha Macav, the Mojave people, depicted in 1853. (H. B. Molhausen) REDISCOVERY • 17 Copyrighted Material 3Pavlik-Ch1 10/9/07 6:43 PM Page 18 Gárces 1776 Kawaiisu Tribal groups Mono Mono Tribe Lake Aviwatha Indian place name Paiute Inyo Owens Valley
    [Show full text]
  • Fishingin the DESERT
    AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL TIME C APSULE • MYSTERIOUS, MAGNIFICENT C AHOKIA american archaeologyWINTER 2000–2001 american archaeologyVol. 4 No. 4 a quarterly publication of The Archaeological Conservancy FishingIN THE DESERT When a lake came and went, the Cahuilla people had to adapt. Archaeologists are learning how they did it. $3.95 american archaeology a quarterly publication of The Archaeological Conservancy Vol. 4 No. 4 winter 2000–2001 C O VER F EATURE FISHING IN THE DESERT 20 BY RICK DOWER When a vast lake suddenly formed in their desert and then gradually evaporated, the Cahuilla people were forced to adapt. 12 DISCOVERING AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL TIME CAPSULE BY LANCE TAPLEY Archaeologist Jeffrey Brain is excavating Popham Colony, an undisturbed site as old as Jamestown and in some ways more important. 27 OF MOUNDS AND MYSTERIES BY JOHN G. CARLTON AND WILLIAM ALLEN Archaeologists have been working for years at Cahokia Mounds State Historic Site to better understand the 2 Lay of the Land remarkable Mississippians. 3 Letters 34 A CULTURAL AFFILIATION CONTROVERSY 5 Events BY JOANNE SHEEHY HOOVER 7 In the News Chaco Culture National Historical Park has determined the The Slow Process of Navajo are culturally affiliated with the Anasazi. Some Repatriation • Native Americans and archaeologists strongly disagree. Archaeologists Rediscover Ancient 38 new acquisition: Maya Center • LEARNING ABOUT THE TATAVIAM Shipwreck Appears to Be Blackbeard’s The Conservancy’s acquisition of Lannan Ranch may Queen Anne’s Revenge provide important information about a little-known people. 40 new acquisition: 42 Field Notes HISTORY ON THE SHORES OF BIG LAKE 44 Expeditions Once the traditional homesite of Passamaquoddy Indian 46 Reviews chiefs, Governor’s Point in Maine is the Conservancy’s northeastern-most preserve.
    [Show full text]
  • Eagle Mountain Pumped Storage Project No. 13123 Final License Application Technical Appendices for Exhibit E, Applicant Prepared Environmental Impact Statement
    PUBLIC Eagle Mountain Pumped Storage Project No. 13123 Final License Application Technical Appendices for Exhibit E, Applicant Prepared Environmental Impact Statement. Volume 3 of 6 Palm Desert, California Submitted to: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Submitted by: Eagle Crest Energy Company Date: June 22, 2009 GEI Project No. 080473 ©2009 Eagle Crest Energy Company 12 Appendix C – Technical Memoranda 12.9 Class I Cultural Resources Investigation for the Proposed Eagle Mountain Pumped Storage Project. A CLASS I CULTURAL RESOURCES INVESTIGATION for the PROPOSED EAGLE MOUNTAIN PUMPED STORAGE PROJECT, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Prepared for: Eagle Crest Energy Company 1 El Paseo West Building, Suite 204 74199 El Paseo Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 Prepared by: Jerry Schaefer ASM Affiliates, Inc. 2034 Corte del Nogal Carlsbad, California 92011 PN 14011 Keywords: USGS 7.5-minute Corn Springs, Desert Center, East of Victory Pass, and Victory Pass quads; Chuckwalla Valley, Eagle Mountain Mine, Riverside County; Desert Training Center, Camp Desert Center, World War II, Historic Trash Scatters; Class III Field Inventory. April 2009 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page MANAGEMENT SUMMARY .................................................................iii 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION..............................................................1 2. ENVIRONMENTAL AND CULTURAL CONTEXT .............................5 NATURAL SETTING .............................................................................. 5 Geomorphology and Geology
    [Show full text]
  • Review and Annotated Bibliography of Ancient Lake Deposits (Precambrian to Pleistocene) G-I in the Western States As Jz;
    o 00 o H Review and Annotated Bibliography of Ancient Lake Deposits (Precambrian to Pleistocene) g-i in the Western States as Jz; GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1080 02 O PH O z eq P S3 Review and Annotated Bibliography of Ancient Lake Deposits (Precambrian to Pleistocene) in the Western States By JOHN H. FETH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1080 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1964 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director The U.S. Geological Survey Library catalog card for this publication appears after page 119. For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 CONTENTS Page Abstract_________._.______-___--__--_---__-_-_------.--_-_-_-__ 1 Introduction.________________________----_-_-____--__-__---._-___- 2 Definitions__ _ _____________--__-_-_--__--_--___-___-___---______ 13 Maps.._____-_______--_-__--------------------------------------- 13 Criteria for the recognition of lake deposits. __-_______.___-_-__.-_____ 17 Definitive criteria____ _ _____-____-__-________---_-___-----_._ 17 Fossils. _-_--____---__-_.---_-------_-----__-_------_. 17 Evaporite deposits..._-_------_------_-------_--------_---. 20 Shore features_________---__-_-------__-_---_-_-_--_-_--_ 21 Suggestive criteria.______.-_-_--___-____---_.-____-__-____.--_. 21 Regional relations._.._-_..-____-..--...__..._..._._.._.... 21 Local evidence.___-__---_--------_--__---_-----_--------__ 22 Grain size, bedding, and lamination...._._.____.___.___.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeological Investigations of Two Lake Cahuilla Associated Rockshelters in the Toro Canyon Area, Riverside County, California
    ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS OF TWO LAKE CAHUILLA ASSOCIATED ROCKSHELTERS IN THE TORO CANYON AREA, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Drew Pallette and Jerry Schaefer Brian F. Mooney Associates 9903-B Businesspark Ave San Diego, California 9213 1 ABSTRACT Excavations at two rockshelters located at the base of the Martinez Mountain Rock slide and 600 meters west of the Lake Cahuilla relict shoreline, provided substantial information on Late Prehistoric activities from the period of the last major lacustral interval. Both sites were interpreted to be temporary camps that were used primarily during times offishing along the lake shore and plant and animal procurement in the surrounding desert. This was indicted by several lines of evidence including fish and mammal bone, lithic and ceramic types, cached flakes from the Wonderstone quarry source, and bedrock milling features. A reconstructed regional settlement model was based on the morphology, ceramic types, local topography, and Cahuilla ethnohistory. INTRODUCTION Environmental Setting The study area is located along the western Project Description margin of the Coachella Valley, in southwestern This paper presents the results of a data re­ Riverside County, California. The valley is the covery program conducted at RlV-1331 and RlV­ northwestern portion of the Salton Trough, 1349, located adjacent to Toro Canyon at the base bounded on the northeast by the Little San Ber­ ofthe Martinez Mountain Rock Slide, in central nardino Mountains, on the southwest by the San Riverside County, California (Figure 1). The two Jacinto and Santa Rosa Mountains, and on the sites are situated in southern Coachella Valley, east by the Mecca Hills and Chocolate Mountains.
    [Show full text]
  • Lakes B of the United States
    Principal Lakes B of the United States Mi GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CIRCULAR 476 Principal Lakes of the United States By Conrad D. Bue GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CIRCULAR 476 Washington 1963 United States Department of the Interior ROGERS C. B. MORION, Secretary Geological Survey V. E. McKelvey, Director First printing 1963 Second printing 1964 Third printing 1965 Fourth printing 1967 Fifth printing 1970 Sixth printing 1973 Free on application to the U.S. Geological Survey, Washington, D.C. 20244 CONTENTS Page Page Abstract.____________________________ 1 Depth oflakes_______________________ 11 Introduction__________________________ 1 Amount of water in lakes_____________ 11 Acknowledgments.____________________ 2 Saline lakes ________________________ 12 Origin of natural lakes ________________ 2 Artificial reservoirs ________________ 17 The Great Lakes _____________________ 5 Selected bibliography ______________ 21 Natural fresh-water lakes _____________ 6 ILLUSTRATIONS Page Figure 1. Photograph of Crater Lake, Oregon._________________________________________ 3 2. Photograph of Wallowa Lake, Oregon ________________________________________ 4 3. Schematic section of Great Lakes ___________________________________________ 5 4. Sketch map of Utah, showing outline of Lake Bonneville and Great Salt Lake______ 13 5. Photograph of Lake Mead at marina in National Recreation Area_______________ 20 TABLES Page Table 1. Statistical data on the Great Lakes________________________________________ 6 2. Natural fresh-water lakes of 10 square miles or more, excluding the
    [Show full text]