Download File

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Download File The Partisan’s Violence, Law and Apartheid: The Assassination of Matthew Goniwe and the Cradock Four Suren Pillay Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2011 © 2011 Suren Pillay All rights reserved ABSTRACT The Partisan’s Violence, Law and Apartheid: The Assassination of Matthew Goniwe and the Cradock Four Suren Pillay This dissertation is a study of an instance of political violence that took place during 1985 in the Eastern Cape province of South Africa, but which had a wider resonance across the country. It involved the killing of four prominent anti-apartheid activists, known as the Cradock Four, by a state security death squad. It is an instance of political violence that allows us to ask ontological questions about the relationship between law, rights and violence; colonial violence and the Cold War, as well as questions about the epistemologies that surround violence in relation to questions of justice. Revisiting this violence, as mediated through the Truth and Reconciliation Commission, this study asks: how does this violence relate to the law itself, since apartheid was after all explicit in its claim to being the product of a legal regime? It argues that we need to think about how this violence against the Cradock Four, committed by a ‘death squad’—and therefore orphaned through denial by both law and an official political narrative—related to the constitution of a South African political community, a political community we also have to remind ourselves, which had a colonial genealogy. To answer these questions I have traced the figures of Matthew Goniwe and his political comrades in two ways. The first half of the dissertation is a study of how they are fashioned in legal discourse – over time mainly as victims of human rights abuses through the Truth and Reconciliation Commission. The second half of the dissertation is a study of their constitution in political discourse, where they become transformed from activists to absolute enemies of the state. In my discussion of this latter transformation, I trace and wish to recover what has become a subaltern narrative: thinking about these activists as instantiations of the forms of what I have called ‘the natives revolt’, and therefore apartheid’s concrete enemy: they are reluctant urban native subjects; neither properly rural and neither properly urban. It is this subject which I argue, finally disrupts the colonial ambitions of apartheid. Table of Contents Acknowledgments……………………………………………………………….ii Chapter One Introduction The Cradock Four: Between Memories of Violence on the Right and Wrong Side of History……………………………………………. 1 Chapter Two Mediations of Pain and Suffering and the Production of Apartheids’ Victim………………………………………………. 45 Chapter Three The juridical life after death of the Cradock Four…………………………………….. 108 Chapter Four The Partisan and the Political …………………………………………………………. 153 Chapter Five Apartheid’s Predicament: The Native as Insurgent……………………………………. 221 Chapter Six From Victims to Enemies………………………………………………………………… 262 Epilogue…………………………………………………………………………………. 286 Bibliography……………………………………………………………………… 295 i Acknowledgements I have realized that the good fortune of a protracted period of being a student and of study, first at the University of the Western Cape in South Africa, and then later at Columbia, has not been that I have found answers to questions that I might have arrived at these institutions with. Rather it has been that I have had the privilege of being able to read and be in the company of a few individuals who have taught me that the question precedes the answer, and that the formulation of a worthy question is a far more challenging proposition than finding the answer to an inconsequential question. I would not be the first to note that in the solitary process of writing we find ourselves conducting internal dialogues with a few people who come to be our primary interlocutors, whose thoughts, and reactions we find ourselves thinking in relation to. Whilst I spent time away from New York City and Columbia University, conducting fieldwork and writing in far away South Africa, the intimate proximity of these interlocutors remained constant. Foremost among them is my dissertation advisor, Mahmood Mamdani. The encounter with Mahmood in Cape Town, and his work, before he took up a Chair at Columbia, fundamentally altered the lenses through which I view South Africa and view the African continent from the vantage point of South Africa. He has altered, by his own example rather than prescription, my notion of what scholarly work might look like. From him I have had the illuminating insight of seeing writing produced that is aware of its location but is not circumscribed by that location. I have also learnt from his ethical disposition the imperative to write about the social worlds we traverse as critical beings, but also as accountable beings. ii This dissertation is largely written in relation to questions that Mahmood laid open and made possible to ask through in his own writing. I am deeply indebted to him for his unconditional and unquestioning support throughout. Two other interlocutors who’s imaginary questions and even raised eye brows often hovered in my mind’s eye when formulating an idea or a sentence, are my dissertation committee members David Scott and Partha Chatterjee. I wish to thank both for their patience and for their generosity of being, and for sharing their thoughts in the seminar room and outside. I have had the good fortune, but I confess, also the quite daunting proposition, of writing with such careful and nuanced readers in mind. It was from David in particular that I learnt to think more about ‘the question’, and to always ask, ‘what might be the upshot?’! At Columbia I was also fortunate enough to have had the quietly unstinting encouragement and support of Nicholas Dirks, and Brinkley Messick, both of whom as Chair’s of the Department, were equally generous with making resources available at crucial moments that enabled the commencement and completion of the dissertation. The external members of my dissertation committee, Peter Vale of the University of Johannesburg, and Sean Jacobs of the New School for Social Research deserve special mention. Both have been invaluable sources of support and critical engagement, and Peter endured with aplomb a dissertation defense conducted over Skype in what were the early hours of the morning for him! iii Much of this dissertation is based on archival research made possible by a generous pre-dissertation fieldwork grant from the Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research. My travel to South Africa, to visit research sites, and to be able to ‘go home’ periodically, was also enabled by a Scheldon Scheps Travel Grant from Columbia University. For those who know what archival work entails, it will not be news that an archive is not a straightforward proposition. A novice like myself had to learn this the hard way, and had to learn that without the clarifying presence of a guide, one could easily enter the labyrinth and come out empty handed. I was shown paths I would not otherwise have seen by librarians and archivists whom I hold in high esteem. At the South African History Archive Sam Jacobs was an eager and efficient guide. At Cullen Library at the University of Witwatersand it was Michelle Pickover whom seem to be able to make things appear from nowhere. I am deeply thankful to the archivists of the Documentation Center of the Department of Defence Archives, Pretoria. And at Cory Library and Rhodes University, Victor Gacuna further entrenched my respect and debt to those who manage the records of the Goniwe Trial. I am also thankful to Bavusile Brown Maaba, then with the Disa Project, UKZN, who shared valuable information with me from the archives on covert agencies of the apartheid government. One of the salutary aspects of immersing oneself in a scholarly community is that scholarly relations can often translate into friendships, and that institutions can become places where we not only find an office, a computer, or a library, but that we also find community. I have found community with a number of institutions over the iv course of this project, all of whom have enabled, and shaped the work and left their imprint on me as a person in one way or another. My first forays into the questions that I have written about started at the University of the Western Cape. In the Department of Political Studies at University of the Western I benefited from the guidance and discussions with Willem van Vuuren, the late Sipho Maseko, Thiven Reddy, Chris Tapscott, Cheryl Hendricks, Bettina von Lieres, Mark Hoskins, Keith Gottschalk, and Joelien Pretorius. A special note of thanks must go to the persistence of Pieter Le Roux. At UWC, it was in the seminars of the History Department and Center for Humanities Research that I also benefited both from deep friendships, encouragement, and more critical expectations! The fertile space created by Premesh Lalu has been crucial to sustaining a lively debate on the ‘presents of the past’, and recurrent ‘deaths’. It has been quite formative to me to have as a community Ciraj Rassool, Leslie Witz, Patricia Hayes, Michael Neocosmos, Heidi Grunebaum, Paulo Israel, Annachiara Forte, Jade Gibson, Brian Raftopolous, Riedwaan Moosage and Lameez Lalkhen. When I mentioned in casual conversation that I needed a quiet place to write, it was Harry Garuba, director of the Center for African Studies at the University of Cape Town, who warmly and instantly offered me a little perch on the hill, as Visiting Research Fellow at the Centre. I was also able to benefit whilst there from discussions with Lungisile Ntsebeza, and I am deeply appreciative of the thoughts and experiences he shared with me about the Eastern Cape, and memories of Mathew Goniwe.
Recommended publications
  • Calvinism in the Context of the Afrikaner Nationalist Ideology
    ASIAN AND AFRICAN STUDIES, 78, 2009, 2, 305-323 CALVINISM IN THE CONTEXT OF THE AFRIKANER NATIONALIST IDEOLOGY Jela D o bo šo vá Institute of Oriental Studies, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Klemensova 19, 813 64 Bratislava, Slovakia [email protected] Calvinism was a part of the mythic history of Afrikaners; however, it was only a specific interpretation of history that made it a part of the ideology of the Afrikaner nationalists. Calvinism came to South Africa with the first Dutch settlers. There is no historical evidence that indicates that the first settlers were deeply religious, but they were worshippers in the Nederlands Hervormde Kerk (Dutch Reformed Church), which was the only church permitted in the region until 1778. After almost 200 years, Afrikaner nationalism developed and connected itself with Calvinism. This happened due to the theoretical and ideological approach of S. J.du Toit and a man referred to as its ‘creator’, Paul Kruger. The ideology was highly influenced by historical developments in the Netherlands in the late 19th century and by the spread of neo-Calvinism and Christian nationalism there. It is no accident, then, that it was during the 19th century when the mythic history of South Africa itself developed and that Calvinism would play such a prominent role in it. It became the first religion of the Afrikaners, a distinguishing factor in the multicultural and multiethnic society that existed there at the time. It legitimised early thoughts of a segregationist policy and was misused for political intentions. Key words: Afrikaner, Afrikaner nationalism, Calvinism, neo-Calvinism, Christian nationalism, segregation, apartheid, South Africa, Great Trek, mythic history, Nazi regime, racial theories Calvinism came to South Africa in 1652, but there is no historical evidence that the settlers who came there at that time were Calvinists.
    [Show full text]
  • Transnational Resistance Strategies and Subnational Concessions in Namibia's Police Zone, 1919-1962
    Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports 2021 “Remov[e] Us From the Bondage of South Africa:” Transnational Resistance Strategies and Subnational Concessions in Namibia's Police Zone, 1919-1962 Michael R. Hogan West Virginia University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd Part of the African History Commons Recommended Citation Hogan, Michael R., "“Remov[e] Us From the Bondage of South Africa:” Transnational Resistance Strategies and Subnational Concessions in Namibia's Police Zone, 1919-1962" (2021). Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports. 8264. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/8264 This Dissertation is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by the The Research Repository @ WVU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Dissertation in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you must obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Dissertation has been accepted for inclusion in WVU Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports collection by an authorized administrator of The Research Repository @ WVU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. “Remov[e] Us From the Bondage of South Africa:” Transnational Resistance Strategies and Subnational Concessions in Namibia's Police Zone, 1919-1962 Michael Robert Hogan Dissertation submitted to the Eberly College of Arts and Sciences at West Virginia University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy In History Robert M.
    [Show full text]
  • Have You Heard from Johannesburg?
    Discussion Have You Heard from GuiDe Johannesburg Have You Heard Campaign support from major funding provided By from JoHannesburg Have You Heard from Johannesburg The World Against Apartheid A new documentary series by two-time Academy Award® nominee Connie Field TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 3 about the Have you Heard from johannesburg documentary series 3 about the Have you Heard global engagement project 4 using this discussion guide 4 filmmaker’s interview 6 episode synopses Discussion Questions 6 Connecting the dots: the Have you Heard from johannesburg series 8 episode 1: road to resistance 9 episode 2: Hell of a job 10 episode 3: the new generation 11 episode 4: fair play 12 episode 5: from selma to soweto 14 episode 6: the Bottom Line 16 episode 7: free at Last Extras 17 glossary of terms 19 other resources 19 What you Can do: related organizations and Causes today 20 Acknowledgments Have You Heard from Johannesburg discussion guide 3 photos (page 2, and left and far right of this page) courtesy of archive of the anti-apartheid movement, Bodleian Library, university of oxford. Center photo on this page courtesy of Clarity films. Introduction AbouT ThE Have You Heard From JoHannesburg Documentary SEries Have You Heard from Johannesburg, a Clarity films production, is a powerful seven- part documentary series by two-time academy award® nominee Connie field that shines light on the global citizens’ movement that took on south africa’s apartheid regime. it reveals how everyday people in south africa and their allies around the globe helped challenge — and end — one of the greatest injustices the world has ever known.
    [Show full text]
  • The Quest for Liberation in South Africa: Contending Visions and Civil Strife, Diaspora and Transition to an Emerging Democracy
    Scientia Militaria, South African Journal of Military Studies, Vol 30, Nr 2, 2000. http://scientiamilitaria.journals.ac.za The Quest for Liberation in South Africa: Contending Visions and Civil Strife, Diaspora and Transition to an Emerging Democracy Ian Liebenberg Introduction: Purpose of this contribution To write an inclusive history of liberation and transition to democracy in South Africa is almost impossible. To do so in the course of one paper is even more demanding, if not daunting. Not only does "the liberation struggle" in South Africa in its broadest sense span more than a century. It also saw the coming and going of movements, the merging and evolving of others and a series of principled and/or pragmatic pacts in the process. The author is attempting here to provide a rather descriptive (and as far as possible, chronological) look at and rudimentary outline to the main organisational levels of liberation in South Africa since roughly the 1870' s. I will draw on my own 2 work in the field lover the past fifteen years as well as other sources • A wide variety of sources and personal experiences inform this contribution, even if they are not mentioned here. Also needless to say, one's own subjectivities may arise - even if an attempt is made towards intersubjecti vity. This article is an attempt to outline and describe the organisations (and where applicable personalities) in an inclusive and descriptive research approach in See Liebenberg (1990), ldeologie in Konjlik, Emmerentia: Taurus Uitgewers; Liebenberg & Van der Merwe (1991), Die Wordingsgeskiedenis van Apartheid, Joernaal vir Eietydse Geskiedenis, vol 16(2): 1-24; Liebenberg (1994), Resistance by the SANNC and the ANC, 1912 - 1960, in Liebenberg et al (Eds.) The Long March: The Story of the Struggle for Liberation in South Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • University of the Witwatersrand
    UNIVERSITY OF THE WITWATERSRAND AFRICAN STUDIES INSTITUTE African Studies Seminar Paper to be presented in RW 4.00pm MARCH 1976 Title: Liberalism and Ethnicity in South African Politics, 1921-1948 by: Paul Rich No. 040 Liberalism and ethnicity in South African politics. 1921-1948 One of the main problems confronting liberal ideology in the South African context is the nature and role of group identities. This has been no small question because liberal theorists have tended to be hide-bound by a reliance on the inherent rationality of a free market that specifically excludes the role of group interests from its sphere of operations. Thus, while twentieth century liberalism has made a number of important revisions in the classical laissez-faire model of the nineteenth century (I), it still places a considerable emphasis on the free market sector even though, as Professor John Kenneth Galbraith has observed, this now typifies only a minority sector in western capitalist economies (2). It is this dependency on the free- market model, however, that restricts the liberal view of rationality to one of economics. The most rational figure in this view remains the classic homo economicus. the child of the Eighteenth Century Enlightenment, who buys in the cheapest market and sells in the dearest. The implications of this model are far-reaching in terms of J social values. If the basis of society is seen to rest on free- floating individuals motivated by a high degree of psychological hedonism then the basis of society's values rests on individual ones to the neglect of the wider community.
    [Show full text]
  • Cradock Four
    Saif Pardawala 12/7/2012 TRC Cradock Four Amnesty Hearings Abstract: The Amnesty Hearing of the Truth and Reconciliation show the connection between the South African Apartheid state and the mysterious disappearances of four Cradock political activists. The testimonies of members of the security police highlight the lengths the apartheid state was willing to go to suppress opposition. The fall of Apartheid and the numerous examples of state mandated human rights abuses against its opponents raised a number of critical questions for South Africans at the time. Among the many issues to be addressed, was the need to create an institution for the restoration of the justice that had been denied to the many victims of apartheid’s crimes. Much like the numerous truth commissions established in Eastern Europe and Latin America after the formation of democracy in those regions, the Truth and Reconciliation Commission was founded with the aims of establishing a restorative, rather than punitive justice. The goal of the TRC was not to prosecute and impose punishment on the perpetrators of the state’s suppression of its opposition, but rather to bring closure to the many victims and their families in the form of full disclosure of the truth. The amnesty hearings undertaken by the TRC represent these aims, by offering full amnesty to those who came forward and confessed their crimes. In the case of Johan van Zyl, Eric Taylor, Gerhardus Lotz, Nicholas van Rensburg, Harold Snyman and Hermanus du Plessis; the amnesty hearings offer more than just a testimony of their crimes. The amnesty hearings of the murderers of a group of anti-apartheid activists known as the Cradock Four show the extent of violence the apartheid state was willing to use on its own citizens to quiet any opposition and maintain its authority.
    [Show full text]
  • Download This Report
    Military bases and camps of the liberation movement, 1961- 1990 Report Gregory F. Houston Democracy, Governance, and Service Delivery (DGSD) Human Sciences Research Council (HSRC) 1 August 2013 Military bases and camps of the liberation movements, 1961-1990 PREPARED FOR AMATHOLE DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY: FUNDED BY: NATIONAL HERITAGE COUNCI Table of Contents Acronyms and Abbreviations ..................................................................................................... ii Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................... iii Chapter 1: Introduction ...............................................................................................................1 Chapter 2: Literature review ........................................................................................................4 Chapter 3: ANC and PAC internal camps/bases, 1960-1963 ........................................................7 Chapter 4: Freedom routes during the 1960s.............................................................................. 12 Chapter 5: ANC and PAC camps and training abroad in the 1960s ............................................ 21 Chapter 6: Freedom routes during the 1970s and 1980s ............................................................. 45 Chapter 7: ANC and PAC camps and training abroad in the 1970s and 1980s ........................... 57 Chapter 8: The ANC’s prison camps ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Gordian Knot: Apartheid & the Unmaking of the Liberal World Order, 1960-1970
    THE GORDIAN KNOT: APARTHEID & THE UNMAKING OF THE LIBERAL WORLD ORDER, 1960-1970 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of the Ohio State University By Ryan Irwin, B.A., M.A. History ***** The Ohio State University 2010 Dissertation Committee: Professor Peter Hahn Professor Robert McMahon Professor Kevin Boyle Professor Martha van Wyk © 2010 by Ryan Irwin All rights reserved. ABSTRACT This dissertation examines the apartheid debate from an international perspective. Positioned at the methodological intersection of intellectual and diplomatic history, it examines how, where, and why African nationalists, Afrikaner nationalists, and American liberals contested South Africa’s place in the global community in the 1960s. It uses this fight to explore the contradictions of international politics in the decade after second-wave decolonization. The apartheid debate was never at the center of global affairs in this period, but it rallied international opinions in ways that attached particular meanings to concepts of development, order, justice, and freedom. As such, the debate about South Africa provides a microcosm of the larger postcolonial moment, exposing the deep-seated differences between politicians and policymakers in the First and Third Worlds, as well as the paradoxical nature of change in the late twentieth century. This dissertation tells three interlocking stories. First, it charts the rise and fall of African nationalism. For a brief yet important moment in the early and mid-1960s, African nationalists felt genuinely that they could remake global norms in Africa’s image and abolish the ideology of white supremacy through U.N.
    [Show full text]
  • Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa Report: Volume 2
    VOLUME TWO Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa Report The report of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission was presented to President Nelson Mandela on 29 October 1998. Archbishop Desmond Tutu Ms Hlengiwe Mkhize Chairperson Dr Alex Boraine Mr Dumisa Ntsebeza Vice-Chairperson Ms Mary Burton Dr Wendy Orr Revd Bongani Finca Adv Denzil Potgieter Ms Sisi Khampepe Dr Fazel Randera Mr Richard Lyster Ms Yasmin Sooka Mr Wynand Malan* Ms Glenda Wildschut Dr Khoza Mgojo * Subject to minority position. See volume 5. Chief Executive Officer: Dr Biki Minyuku I CONTENTS Chapter 1 Chapter 6 National Overview .......................................... 1 Special Investigation The Death of President Samora Machel ................................................ 488 Chapter 2 The State outside Special Investigation South Africa (1960-1990).......................... 42 Helderberg Crash ........................................... 497 Special Investigation Chemical and Biological Warfare........ 504 Chapter 3 The State inside South Africa (1960-1990).......................... 165 Special Investigation Appendix: State Security Forces: Directory Secret State Funding................................... 518 of Organisations and Structures........................ 313 Special Investigation Exhumations....................................................... 537 Chapter 4 The Liberation Movements from 1960 to 1990 ..................................................... 325 Special Investigation Appendix: Organisational structures and The Mandela United
    [Show full text]
  • Early Childhood Development Knowledge Building Seminar 4 to 5 December 2014
    Early Childhood Development Knowledge Building Seminar 4 to 5 December 2014 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS A special word of thanks to: All the speakers who made their knowledge and time available for the benefit of all working in early childhood development. A complete list of speakers are available at the back of this report. Zanele Twala, Marie-Louise Samuels, Linda Biersteker, Hasina Ebrahim and Andries Viviers who acted aptly as session chairpersons throughout the ECD Knowledge Building Seminar. Lucky Howard from UNICEF for assistance in the logistical arrangements for the ECD Knowledge Building Seminar. Report compiled under contract by: Ms Pam Picken. This report provides an overview of the presentations and the discussions that took place in the subsequent dialogues. Where references occur in the text it is linked to a particular presenter’s presentation and a full list of references is not provided. All speakers were provided with the opportunity to review the text of their presentations in this publications. © UNICEF All care has been taken to ensure that the information is correct. The opinions expressed herein and any statements represented as fact do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of UNICEF, Department of Basic Education, Department of Social Development and the National Planning Commission nor should they be assumed to do so. With proper identification of the source, the document may be freely quoted, reviewed, abstracted, reproduced and translated, in part or in whole, but not for sale nor for use in conjunction with commercial purposes. Original sources should be acknowledged where indicated in the publication. Suggested citation: UNICEF.
    [Show full text]
  • Sitting(Link Is External)
    1 THURSDAY, 10 MAY 2018 PROCEEDINGS OF THE WESTERN CAPE PROVINCIAL PARLIAMENT The sign † indicates the original language and [ ] directly thereafter indicates a translation. The House met at 14:15 The Deputy Speaker took the Chair and read the prayer. The DEPUTY SPEAKER: You may be seated. [Interjections.] Order! I see the Chief Whip first. (Notice of Motion) Mr M G E WILEY: Thank you, Mr Deputy Speaker. I give notice that I shall move: That, notwithstanding the provisions of Rule 198, precedence be given to the Subject for Discussion. Thank you. The DEPUTY SPEAKER: Thank you. No objection to that? Agreed to. 2 We will then start with the Subject for Discussion in the name of the hon member Gillion. I see the hon Gillion. †Mnr Q R DYANTYI: Hoor-hoor! [Mr Q R DYANTYI: Hear-hear!] Ms M N GILLION: Mr Deputy Speaker, 2018 marks the tail -end of this administration’s term and the DA’s decade of misrule is representative of a period of regression in service delivery for the poor. Reality is that th is protracted period of disservice to our people has been marked by the deteriorating living conditions for the poor and marginalised, which forced thousands of people to take to the streets on Freedom Day, calling on the DA Government to break with the past and focus on service delivery. The most pressing challenges faced by the people in this province include inadequate living conditions, crime, poverty, dread diseases and unemployment. These challenges seem to be colour -conscious as they affect the black majority, while the minority is well taken care of.
    [Show full text]
  • Anti·Apartheid
    FREE anti·apartheid iACTION! October 1985 BAY AREA FREE SOUTH AFRICA MOVEMENT No.4 BAFSAM Opposes Trade With Apartheid On October 8, the Bay Area Free South Africa Movement (BAFSAM) met with the Oakland Port Commission to demand that the Port of Oakland forbid the handling of both incoming and outgoing trade with South Africa. The struggle to get the Port Commis­ sioners to agree to this demand is part and parcel of an international call to break all diplomatic, economic and cul­ tural ties with the apartheid (racially­ segregated) regime. The call for breaking these ties with South Africa has been made by the South African Congress of Trade Unions (SACTU) and other black trade unions. It has been endorsed by the International Confederation of Free Trade Unions (ICFTU), the World Fed­ eration of.Trade Unions (WFTU) and the International Labor Organization of the United Nations (!LO). Given that the United States is South Africa's number one trading partner, the BAFSAM has always stressed the importance of cutting off trade relations with the South African regime. the BAFSAM joins with the workers and community activists of New Orleans, Vancouver, B.C., Los Angeles, Tacoma, and Vancouver in Washington state, and picket line at the Oakland offices of the SAM, along with representatives from San Francisco who have refused to Pacific Maritime Association, and mon­ 20 other community organizations and unload or have delayed unloading itored and picketed other incoming trade unions, attended the West Coast South African car_go. ofteh risking vio­ ships laden with South African goods. Meeting to Stop South African Trade.
    [Show full text]