ՊԱՏՄՈՒԹՅԱՆ ՏԵՍՈՒԹՅՈՒՆ Albert A. Stepanian, Doctor of History
[email protected] SAPIENTIA ILLUSTRIS HISTORIAE An Attempt of Revising the Texts by Eghishē and Moses Khorenatsi* Key words - Eghishē, Moses Khorenatsi, Golden Age, Hellenistic Christianity, Zoroastrianism, Great Revolt, epical perception of history, tragic history, synthetic history, reverse perspective, historian, advanced reader. Introduction With Hellenistic cultural influence, the western canon of historiography – tragic and pragmatic histories – were introduced in Greater Armenia. The eminent intellectu- als Methrodor of Scepsis and Artavazd II were the pioneers of this innovation. How- ever, we have no evidence that this theoretic comprehension was developed by the subsequent historians – Mar Aba Katina, Priest Olymp, Bardetsan. Most probably, they compiled chronographies on events of the past and present of Armenian history1. The new wave of Hellenism generated cultural revival spurred by Christianization of Greater Armenia (301) and invention of the Armenian script system by St. Mesrop Mashtots (405). It gave birth to various genres of intellectual activity – theology and philosophy, rhetoric and poetry, linguistics and hermeneutics, history and geography.2 Historiography occupied a central position in the new cultural paradigm. Its best representatives saw their task in shaping the perspective of history combining Hellenistic, Christian (and even Iranian) values with those of national epic tales and historical chronicles.3 In time, a steady concept was thought out on the early medieval *Հոդվածն ընդունվել է տպագրության 20. 11. 2016։ 1 Sargsyan, 1966, 239 -241; Sargsyan, 1969, 107 – 115. 2 About the new paradigm of Armenian mentality based on the inner (Christian) and outer (pagan) intellectual experience համահայկական հանդես Ը (ԺԴ) տարի, թիվ 4 (56), հոկտեմբեր-դեկտեմբեր, 2016 Ը (ԺԴ) տարի, թիվ 4 (56), հոկտեմբեր-դեկտեմբեր, համահայկական հանդես see Inglisian, 1963, 158 – 165; Thomson, 1999, 218 – 226; Shirinian, 2005, 189 - 194.