DOCSLIB.ORG

Telangana Issue After Holding Consultations with Leaders from Telangana, Rayalaseema and Coastal Andhra Regions for Over Two Months

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Telangana Issue After Holding Consultations with Leaders from Telangana, Rayalaseema and Coastal Andhra Regions for Over Two Months Telangana What is Telangana? Telangana refers broadly to the parts of the state that formed the erstwhile Hyderabad state. Telangana is a region in the present state of Andhra Pradesh, India and formerly was part of Hyderabad state which was ruled by Nizam. It is bordered with the states of Maharashtra on the north and north-west, Karnataka on the west, Chattisgarh on the north-east and Orissa to the east. Andhra Pradesh State has three main cultural regions of which Telengana is one part and others include Coastal Andhra region on the east and Rayalaseema region on the south. The Telangana region has an area of 114,840 square kilometres (44,340 sq mi), and a population of 35,286,757 (2011 census) which is 41.6% of Andhra Pradesh state population. The Telangana region comprise of 10 districts: Adilabad, Hyderabad, Khammam, Karimnagar, Mahbubnagar, Medak, Nalgonda, Nizamabad, Rangareddy, and Warangal. The Musi River, Krishna and Godavari rivers flow through the region from west to east. Historical Perspective The ruler of India’s largest princely state, Mir Osman Ali Khan, the seventh Nizam of Hyderabad, was not willing to acede either to India or Pakistan in 1947. Then the Telangana Rebellion started, which was a peasant revolt which was later supported by the Communists. It took place in the former princely state of Hyderabad between 1946 and 1951. This was led by the Communist Party of India. The revolt began in the Nalgonda district and quickly spread to the Warangal and Bidar districts. Peasant farmers and labourers revolted against the local feudal landlords (jagirdars and deshmukhs) and later against the Osman Ali Khan, Asif Jah VII. The initial aims were to do away with illegal and excessive exploitation meted out by these feudal lords in the name of bonded labour (Vetti Chakiri). The most strident demand was for all debts of the peasants to be written off. [7] [8] When India became independent from the British Empire in 1947, the Nizam of Hyderabad did not want to merge with Indian Union and wanted to remain independent under the special provisions given to princely states. He even asked for a corridor, a passage from India. Rebellion had started throughout the state against the Nizam's rule and his army, known as the Razakars. The Government of India annexed Hyderabad State on 17 September 1948, in an operation by the Indian Army called Operation Polo. When India became independent, Telugu-speaking people were distributed in about 22 districts, 9 of them in the former Nizam's dominions of the princely state of Hyderabad, 12 in the Madras Presidency (Northern Circars), and one in French-controlled Yanam. The Central Government appointed a civil servant, M. K. Vellodi, as First Chief Minister of Hyderabad State on 26 January 1950. He administered the state with the help of bureaucrats from Madras State and Bombay State. In 1952, Dr. Burgula Ramakrishna Rao was elected Chief minister of Hyderabad State in the first democratic election. During this time there were violent agitations by some Telanganites to send back bureaucrats from Madras state, and to strictly implement rule by natives of Hyderabad. Meanwhile, Telugu-speaking areas in the Northern Circars and Rayalaseema regions were carved out of the erstwhile Madras state on the fast unto death by Potti Sri Ramulu to create Andhra State in 1953, with Kurnool as its capital. Nehru chose to ignore Sriramulu’s fast. On the 56th day of his fast unto death, Sriramulu died and violence erupted.In December 1953, the States Reorganization Commission was appointed to study the creation of states on linguistic basis.[16] The States Reorganisation Commission (SRC) was not in favour of an immediate merger of Telangana region with Andhra state, despite their common language.Paragraph 382 of the States Reorganisation Commission Report (SRC) said "opinion in Andhra is overwhelmingly in favour of the larger unit; public opinion in Telangana has still to crystallize itself. Important leaders of public opinion in Andhra themselves seem to appreciate that the unification of Telangana with Andhra, though desirable, should be based on a voluntary and willing association of the people and that it is primarily for the people of Telangana to take a decision about their future".The people of Telangana had several concerns. The region had a less-developed economy than Andhra, but with a larger revenue base (mostly because it taxed rather than prohibited alcoholic beverages), which people of Telangana feared might be diverted for use in Andhra. They feared that planned irrigation projects on the Krishna and Godavari rivers would not benefit Telangana proportionately, even though people of Telangana controlled the headwaters of the rivers. It was feared that the people of Andhra, who had access to higher standards of education under the British rule, would have an unfair advantage in seeking government and educational jobs.The commission proposed that the Telangana region be constituted as a separate state with a provision for unification with Andhra state, after the 1961 general elections, if a resolution could be passed in the Telangana state assembly with a two-thirds majority. The Chief Minister of Hyderabad State, Burgula Ramakrishna Rao, expressed his view that a majority of Telangana people were against the merger. He supported the Congress party's central leadership decision to merge Telangana and Andhra despite opposition in Telangana. Andhra state assembly passed a resolution on 25 November 1955 to provide safeguards to Telangana. The resolution said, "Assembly would further like to assure the people in Telangana that the development of that area would be deemed to be special charge, and that certain priorities and special protection will be given for the improvement of that area, such as reservation in services and educational institutions on the basis of population and irrigational development." Telangana leaders did not believe the safeguards would work. With lobbying from Andhra Congress leaders and with pressure from the Central leadership of Congress party, an agreement was reached between Telangana leaders and Andhra leaders on 20 February 1956 to merge Telangana and Andhra with promises to safeguard Telangana's interests. Prime minister Jawaharlal Nehru initially was skeptical of merging Telangana with Andhra State, fearing a "tint of expansionist imperialism" in it. He compared the merger to a matrimonial alliance having "provisions for divorce" if the partners in the alliance cannot get on well. Following the Gentlemen's agreement, the central government established a unified Andhra Pradesh on November 1, 1956. The agreement provided reassurances to Telangana in terms of power-sharing as well as administrative domicile rules and distribution of expenses of various regions. Anti-Nehru politics emerged with the repression of the Telengana movement; many within the Congress Party extended their hands to leftists. But within a few years, Andhra Pradesh was rocked by political turmoil. Between 1969 and 1972, the state witnessed two separate movements- ‘ Jai Telangana’ and ‘Jai Andhra’. The Telangana leaders accused Andhra leaders of flouting the gentlemen’s agreement. Andhra leaders retaliated by saying the ‘Mulkis’ policy was discrimination against them. In 1919’ the Nizam had issued a decree stating that only ‘Mulkis’, that is people born in the state or those who had lived there for atleast 15 years, were eligible for public appointment in the state. Domiciled ‘Mulkis’ were also required to have an affidavit that they would never return to their native places. After the merger, the people of Hyderabad wanted this rule to be observed, while the people of coastal Andhra and other parts of the state were against it. The movement which started with the demands of safeguarding the interests of the people of the erstwhile Hyderabad state soon started demanding a separate state. On January 10, 1973, president’s rule was imposed, but soon the matter was resolved for the time being. What are the grievances of the people of Telangana and why they want it to be a separate state? 1.The government has discriminated against the region by providing a huge chunk of aid to private colleges (Junior as well as Degree) in coastal Andhra and Rayalaseema with very little to the private colleges in Telangana. A clarification was sought by the Committee about the basis for deciding grants to private colleges. The response from the Higher Education Department, Government of Andhra Pradesh is given in Appendix 3.16. It confirms that the aid to the private colleges in Telangana is much less than that in coastal Andhra and Rayalaseema. 2.Another issue brought up here is regarding the distribution of the location of the state universities/institution facilities region-wise. While state level institutions are spread out in many districts of coastal Andhra and Rayalaseema, in Telangana region they are located only in the capital city Hyderabad. It is pointed out that JNTU originally proposed to be located in Warangal was shifted to Hyderabad and Dr. B. R. Ambedkar Open University located in Nalgonda district was also shifted within two months to Hyderabad. The reason given was that state level universities should be located in the state capital; however, this principle was not followed in the case of many state level universities/institutions that were started in coastal Andhra and Rayalaseema regions. The new IIT was proposed to be setup in the temple town of Basar in Adilabad district but later shifted to Medak district near Hyderabad. It is asserted that indirect benefits in terms of employment and development of the area around a state level institute/university are denied to the 9 districts of Telangana while 4 state level institutions have been located in one town (Tirupati) of district Chittoor in Rayalaseema region.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 03404349.Pdf
    UA MIGRATION AND DEVELOPMENT STUDY GROUP Jagdish M. Bhagwati Nazli Choucri Wayne A. Cornelius John R. Harris Michael J. Piore Rosemarie S. Rogers Myron Weiner a ........ .................. ..... .......... C/77-5 INTERNAL MIGRATION POLICIES IN AN INDIAN STATE: A CASE STUDY OF THE MULKI RULES IN HYDERABAD AND ANDHRA K.V. Narayana Rao Migration and Development Study Group Center for International Studies Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139 August 1977 Preface by Myron Weiner This study by Dr. K.V. Narayana Rao, a political scientist and Deputy Director of the National Institute of Community Development in Hyderabad who has specialized in the study of Andhra Pradesh politics, examines one of the earliest and most enduring attempts by a state government in India to influence the patterns of internal migration. The policy of intervention began in 1868 when the traditional ruler of Hyderabad State initiated steps to ensure that local people (or as they are called in Urdu, mulkis) would be given preferences in employment in the administrative services, a policy that continues, in a more complex form, to the present day. A high rate of population growth for the past two decades, a rapid expansion in education, and a low rate of industrial growth have combined to create a major problem of scarce employment opportunities in Andhra Pradesh as in most of India and, indeed, in many countries in the third world. It is not surprising therefore that there should be political pressures for controlling the labor market by those social classes in the urban areas that are best equipped to exercise political power.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Description of the Module Items Description of the Module Subject
    Description of the Module Items Description of the Module Subject Name Sociology Paper Name Agrarian Relations and Social Structure in India Module Name/Title Telangana Movement Objectives This module introduces you to the nature of the peasant mobilization through the case study of Telngana movement. It focuses on the agrarian structure of the region during the insurgency, and oulinesthe structural coordinates of feudal exploitation in Telangana. Key words Feudal Exploitation, Land Tenure System, Agrarian Economy. Module Structure TelanganaMovement Introduction,The Historical Setting,Types of Land Tenure, Feudal Exploitation, Economic and Caste Hierarchy, Agrarian Economy, The Andhra Conference, the Beginning and Growth of the insurrection, Salient Features of the movement, Decline of the Movement, Principal Participants, Causes for Withdrawal, Comments on the success and failure of the movement, Conclusion. Role Name Affiliation Principal Invesigator Prof Sujata Patel Dept. of Sociology, University of Hyderabad Paper Coordinator Dr Manish K Thakur IIM Calcutta Content Writer A Chandrashekar Reddy Dept. of Sociology, University of Hyderabad Content Reviewer Manish Thakur IIM Calcutta Language Editor Manish Thakur IIM Calcutta 1 Introduction: Social movements have always been an inseparable part of social progress. Through collective action, organizedprotests and resisting the structures of domination,peasant movements have historically paved the way for new thoughts and actions that revitalizes the process of social change (Singha Roy, 2004). TelanganaMovement was one such movement in the 20th century India which had ended the feudalistic oppression of landlords and the autocratic Nizam rule in the Telangana.The Telangana movement of the mid-1940s and the early 1950s was unparalleled in the 20th century history of India for its intensity, participants’ militancy and the height of revolutionism they ascended.
    [Show full text]
  • South Asia Multidisciplinary Academic Journal, 22 | 2019, “Student Politics in South Asia” [Online], Online Since 15 December 2019, Connection on 24 March 2021
    South Asia Multidisciplinary Academic Journal 22 | 2019 Student Politics in South Asia Jean-Thomas Martelli and Kristina Garalyté (dir.) Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/samaj/5852 DOI: 10.4000/samaj.5852 ISSN: 1960-6060 Publisher Association pour la recherche sur l'Asie du Sud (ARAS) Electronic reference Jean-Thomas Martelli and Kristina Garalyté (dir.), South Asia Multidisciplinary Academic Journal, 22 | 2019, “Student Politics in South Asia” [Online], Online since 15 December 2019, connection on 24 March 2021. URL: http://journals.openedition.org/samaj/5852; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/samaj. 5852 This text was automatically generated on 24 March 2021. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Generational Communities: Student Activism and the Politics of Becoming in South Asia Jean-Thomas Martelli and Kristina Garalytė Student Politics in British India and Beyond: The Rise and Fragmentation of the All India Student Federation (AISF), 1936–1950 Tom Wilkinson A Campus in Context: East Pakistan’s “Mass Upsurge” at Local, Regional, and International Scales Samantha Christiansen Crisis of the “Nehruvian Consensus” or Pluralization of Indian Politics? Aligarh Muslim University and the Demand for Minority Status Laurence Gautier Patronage, Populism, and Protest: Student Politics in Pakistani Punjab Hassan Javid The Spillovers of Competition: Value-based Activism and Political Cross-fertilization in an Indian Campus Jean-Thomas Martelli Regional Charisma: The Making of a Student Leader in a Himalayan Hill Town Leah Koskimaki Performing the Party. National Holiday Events and Politics at a Public University Campus in Bangladesh Mascha Schulz Symbolic Boundaries and Moral Demands of Dalit Student Activism Kristina Garalytė How Campuses Mediate a Nationwide Upsurge against India’s Communalization.
    [Show full text]
  • Operation Polo - Hyderabad's Accession to India
    Operation Polo - Hyderabad's accession to India Description: History, as we know, is told by the winning side, in the way they'd choose to. During Indian independence, the military action Operation Polo annexed the princely state of Hyderabad to India, against the communists and the Nizam rule. This part of history is often not spoken about as much as we speak of the freedom movement or the partition. Yunus Lasania, in his two-part episode on Operation Polo, tells the story of the Hyderabad rebellion through the people who lived through that time. In this episode, Burgula Narsing Rao, the nephew of the first chief minister of Hyderabad state before the creation of Joint Andhra Pradesh Burgula Ramakrishna Rao shares his memories and view of the Hyderabad rebellion during the last phase of Nizam's rule. Hello everyone! This episode is going to be very special. All the episodes that we will release this month will be important, as they relate with one part of Hyderabad’s history, which is suppressed since independence. In 2017, India celebrated 70 years of its independence. Funnily, the independence day back in 1947 didn’t mean anything to Hyderabad. Hyderabad was a princely state until 1948. It comprised parts of Maharashtra, Karnataka and Telangana, had 16 districts ( 8 in Telangana and 8 in Maharashtra). The present-day Andhra and Rayalaseema areas were with the British. During/after 15 August 1947, most princely states Joined the Indian union, but, Hyderabad was one among the handful that refused to join. The state of Hyderabad was ruled by the last Nizam- Mir Osman Ali Khan.
    [Show full text]
  • A Perspective on Bhimireddy Narsimha Reddy's
    Vol.2 No. 3 April 2018 E-ISSN: 2456-5571 A PERSPECTIVE ON BHIMIREDDY NARSIMHA REDDY’S ROLE IN TELANGANA ARMED STRUGGLE (1946-51) Dr. Gugulothu Ravi Lecturer, Department of History, Acharya Degree College, Warangal, Telangana, India Abstract Comrade Bhimireddy Narsimha Reddy was a freedom fighter and a leader of the Telangana Rebellion, fighting for the liberation of the Telangana region of Hyderabad State from the oppressive rule of the Nizam. He belonged to Suryapet district of today's Telangana. B.N.Reddy, as he was known, fought the Razakars during the Nizam’s rule for six years by being underground. He escaped 10 attempts on his life, prominent among them being an attack against him, his wife and infant son by the Razakars near Mahbubabad in Warangal district. Narsimha Reddy broke the army cordon while exchanging fire and escaped. He also carried out struggles against feudal oppression and bonded labour. Renowned across Telangana with his simple name of BN, he is none other than Bhimireddy Narsimha Reddy. Those were the days during which the poor people of Telangana suffered inexplicable exploitation at the hand of the Landlords and toiled as slaves without an iota of freedom He thought that socialism was the ultimate system for the safety of mankind. With the entry into armed struggle he fought against the Nizam’s rule and in a free society he aspired to provide food, shelter, employment for the poor people of Telangana. Keywords: Bhimireddy Narsimha Reddy’s role in Telangana Armed Struggle Introduction atrocities of the Nizam and need for a struggle against his Telangana Armed Struggle was a historical and a tyranny.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Imbalance in the Indian State of Andhra Pradesh with Special Reference to Telengana
    REGIONAL IMBALANCE IN THE INDIAN STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO TELENGANA A Dissertation submitted to the Tilak Maharashtra University Towards the Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF PHILOSOPHY IN POLITICAL SCIENCE Submitted by: Supervised by: Robinson. Undrasi (Rg. No: 2207012987) Dr. Manik Sonawane Principal, (SDA) Head, Dept.of Political science, Mumbai Central. T.M.V. Sadashiv Peth, Pune DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE TILAK MAHARASHTRA UNIVERSITY SADASHIV PETH, PUNE 411031 JANUARY 2013 DECLARATION BY THE CANDIDATE I, Robinson Undrasi declare on oath that the references and literature which are quoted in my dissertation entitle “Regional imbalance in the Indian state of Andhra Pradesh with special reference to Telangana” are from original sources and are acknowledged at the appropriate place in the dissertation. I declare further that I have not used this information for any purpose other than my research. Place : Mumbai Date : January, 2013 (Robinson Undrasi) Dr. Manik D. Sonawane Post-Graduate Dept. of Political M.A., M.Phil, Ph.d. Science and Public Administration, Head of the Department Tilak Maharashtra Vidya Peeth Sadashiv Peth, Pune. 411030 Ph. 020-24454866 ==================================================== CERTIFICATE BY GUIDE This is Certified that the work incorporated in his ‘M.Phil’ dissertation “Regional imbalance in the Indian state of Andhra Pradesh with special reference to Telangana” submitted by Robinson Undrasi was carried out under my supervision. Such material as obtained from other sources has been duly acknowledged in the dissertation. Date: / / Dr. Manik D. Sonawane ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I express my sincere gratitude to my guide Dr. Manik Sonawane, Head of Department of Political Science Tilak Maharashtra Vidyapeth for his valuable guidance, critical comments, encourage and constent inspiration throughout this course of investigation.
    [Show full text]
  • Locating the Movement for Telangana's Statehood: a Critical Inquiry
    Vol 6 Issue 10 July 2017 ISSN No : 2249-894X ORIGINAL ARTICLE Monthly Multidisciplinary Research Journal Review Of Research Journal Chief Editors Ashok Yakkaldevi Ecaterina Patrascu A R Burla College, India Spiru Haret University, Bucharest Kamani Perera Regional Centre For Strategic Studies, Sri Lanka Welcome to Review Of Research RNI MAHMUL/2011/38595 ISSN No.2249-894X Review Of Research Journal is a multidisciplinary research journal, published monthly in English, Hindi & Marathi Language. All research papers submitted to the journal will be double - blind peer reviewed referred by members of the editorial Board readers will include investigator in universities, research institutes government and industry with research interest in the general subjects. Regional Editor Dr. T. Manichander Advisory Board Kamani Perera Delia Serbescu Mabel Miao Regional Centre For Strategic Studies, Sri Spiru Haret University, Bucharest, Romania Center for China and Globalization, China Lanka Xiaohua Yang Ruth Wolf Ecaterina Patrascu University of San Francisco, San Francisco University Walla, Israel Spiru Haret University, Bucharest Karina Xavier Jie Hao Fabricio Moraes de AlmeidaFederal Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), University of Sydney, Australia University of Rondonia, Brazil USA Pei-Shan Kao Andrea Anna Maria Constantinovici May Hongmei Gao University of Essex, United Kingdom AL. I. Cuza University, Romania Kennesaw State University, USA Romona Mihaila Marc Fetscherin Loredana Bosca Spiru Haret University, Romania Rollins College, USA Spiru Haret University, Romania Liu Chen Beijing Foreign Studies University, China Ilie Pintea Spiru Haret University, Romania Mahdi Moharrampour Nimita Khanna Govind P. Shinde Islamic Azad University buinzahra Director, Isara Institute of Management, New Bharati Vidyapeeth School of Distance Branch, Qazvin, Iran Delhi Education Center, Navi Mumbai Titus Pop Salve R.
    [Show full text]
  • Colonialism and Patterns of Ethnic Conflict in Contemporary India By
    Colonialism and Patterns of Ethnic Conflict in Contemporary India by Ajay Verghese B.A. in Political Science and in French, May 2005, Temple University A Dissertation submitted to The Faculty of Columbian College of Arts and Sciences of The George Washington University in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy January 31st, 2013 Dissertation directed by Emmanuel Teitelbaum Associate Professor of Political Science and International Affairs The Columbian College of Arts and Sciences of The George Washington University certifies that Ajay Verghese has passed the Final Examination for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy as of August 22nd, 2012. This is the final and approved form of the dissertation. Colonialism and Patterns of Ethnic Conflict in Contemporary India Ajay Verghese Dissertation Research Committee: Emmanuel Teitelbaum, Associate Professor of Political Science and International Affairs, Dissertation Director Henry E. Hale, Associate Professor of Political Science and International Affairs, Committee Member Henry J. Farrell, Associate Professor of Political Science and International Affairs, Committee Member ii © Copyright 2012 by Ajay Verghese All rights reserved iii Acknowledgements Completing a Ph.D. and writing a dissertation are rather difficult tasks, and it pleases me to now finally have the opportunity to thank the numerous individuals who have provided support one way or another over the years. There are unfortunately too many people to recognize so I apologize in advance for those I may have forgotten. Foremost, I benefited immensely from a stellar dissertation committee. My greatest thanks go to Manny Teitelbaum, my dissertation chair. Most of what I know about being a scholar I learned from Manny.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Paper VARIOUS FACETS of TELANGANA STATE Journal Of
    Journal of Global Biosciences ISSN 2320-1355 Volume 5, Number 9, 2016, pp. 4585-4589 Website: www.mutagens.co.in E-mail: [email protected] [email protected] Research Paper VARIOUS FACETS OF TELANGANA STATE Kavitha Toran Department of Geoinformatics PG Centre, Bhiknoor Telangana University Telangana State. INTRODUCTION Telangana is one of the 31 states in India, located in the southern India. Telangana has an area of 114,840 square kilometres (44,340 sq mi), and a population of 35,193,978 (2011 census), making it the twelfth largest state in India, and the twelfth most populated state in India. Its major cities include Hyderabad, Warangal, Nizamabad, Khammam and Karimnagar. Telangana is bordered by the states of Maharashtra to the North and North-West, Chhattisgarh to the North, Karnataka to the West, and Andhra Pradesh to the East and South. Telangana acquired its identity as the Telugu speaking region of the princely state of Hyderabad, ruled by the Nizam of Hyderabad, joining the Union of India in 1948. In 1956, the Hyderabad state was dissolved as part of the linguistic reorganisation of states and Telangana was merged with former Andhra State to form Andhra Pradesh, following a movement for separation. Journal of Global Biosciences Vol. 5(9), 2016 pp. 4585-4589 ISSN 2320-1355 HISTORY During its history, Telangana was governed by many rulers, including the Satavahana dynasty (230 BCE to 220 CE), the Kakatiya Dynasty (1083–1323), the Musunuri Nayaks (1326–1356) the Delhi Sultanate, the Bahmani Sultanate (1347–1512), Qutb Shahi dynasty (1512–1687), Mughal Empire (1687–1724) and Asaf Jahi Dynasty (1724–1948) When India became independent from the British Empire in 1947, the Nizam of Hyderabad did not want to merge with the Indian Union and wanted to remain independent.
    [Show full text]
  • Kavitha Cherupally* Original Research Paper History
    Original Research Paper Volume - 10 | Issue - 11 | November - 2020 | PRINT ISSN No. 2249 - 555X | DOI : 10.36106/ijar History THE ROLE WOMEN IN TELANGANA ARMED STRUGGLE Kavitha Asst, Prof. of History GDC.Zcharla, H-No.22-581, Vinayakahills, Phase.3. Road No.2. Almasguda (village), Balapur (Mandal), Rangareddy (District),Pin-500058.Telangana Cherupally* State. *Corresponding Author KEYWORDS : INTRODUCTION that area. The peasants in these areas were nothing but bonded - slaves The “Telangana Armed Struggle” occupies a unique place, not only on or total serfs under the Nizam. Even whatever little rights existed in the history of India but also in the history of the people's Liberation the diwani area was denied to them. struggle of the World. During the Second half of 18 Th Century the Burgeousice (middle class) industrial workers and peasants fought The Jagir areas constituted 30 percent of the total states. In these areas, liberation struggle throughout the Europe against the Monarchism and Paigas, Samasthanams, Jagirdars, Ijavdars, Banjardars, Muktedars, Feudal Desports under the slogans of “Liberty, Equality and Inamdars, or Agraharams were the various kinds of feudal complexes. Fratiernity”. Some of these used to have their own revenue ofcers to collect the taxes they used to impose.4 Some of these Jagirs,Paigas and Women Participation In Telangana Armed Struggle samsthanams especially the biggest ones had their own separate The 1940's mark a new phase in the politics of Hyderabad state. The police, revenue, civil and criminal systems. They were subfeudatory struggle, issues raised and the ideology that supported this all heralded states, under the Nizam's state of Hyderabad which was itself a strong a new and radical phase.Moving from demands for freedom of social native state under the British princely states.
    [Show full text]
  • Civilian Participation in Politics and Violent Revolution: Ideology, Networks, and Action in Peru and India
    CIVILIAN PARTICIPATION IN POLITICS AND VIOLENT REVOLUTION: IDEOLOGY, NETWORKS, AND ACTION IN PERU AND INDIA A Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences of Georgetown University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Government By Devin M. Finn, M.A. Washington, DC May 25, 2016 Copyright 2017 by Devin M. Finn All Rights Reserved ii CIVILIAN PARTICIPATION IN POLITICS AND VIOLENT REVOLUTION: IDEOLOGY, NETWORKS, AND ACTION IN PERU AND INDIA Devin Finn, M.A. Thesis Advisor: Charles King, Ph.D. ABSTRACT How and why do ordinary people in democratic states participate in violent revolution? This dissertation explores variation in the confluence of civilians’ participation in status quo politics – through electoral channels and civil society action – and in violent insurgencies that seek to conquer the state. Through a comparative juxtaposition of Peru’s Shining Path and the Naxalite movement in India, I argue that an insurgency’s particular ideological interpretations and conceptions of membership shape civilian support by influencing everyday social relations between rebels and civilians and changing networks of participation. During war, civilians are agents of political mobilization, and rebels exploit social networks, which draw on historical forms of organization and activism and a long trajectory of political ideas about race, citizenship, and class. I examine people’s varied participation in violent politics in three settings: the regions of Ayacucho and Puno, Peru (1960-1992), and Telangana, a region of southern India (1946-51). Where communities in Peru drew on existing political resources – diverse networks that expressed peasants’ demands for reform and representation, and which emphasized commitment to democratic contestation over armed struggle – people could choose to resist rebels’ mobilizing efforts.
    [Show full text]
  • The Reorganization of Political Power 2
    Contents Preface xxv Acknowledgments xxix A Note on Transliteration xxxi Chronology xxxiii Thematic Table of Contents xli List of Maps lvii 1. The Eighteenth Century: Ferment and Change 1 The Reorganization of Political Power 2 Aurangzeb: Letters to His Sons 4 Shah Wali-Allah: The Urgency of Political Instability 5 Iradat Khan: Decay at the Center of the Empire 7 Rebelling Against the Mughals: The Sikhs 8 Muhammad Qasim on Banda Bahadur’s Sikh Army 9 The Sikh Religious Code: Lives of Discipline and Devotion 10 Marathas: Courtiers, Rebels, Raiders, and State Builders 11 The History of Khafi Khan and the Story of Tara Bai 12 Ahilya Bai Holkar: A Maratha Woman Ruler 13 vi Contents The Marathas as Raiders: A Bengali Perspective 14 Forts and War: The Essential Features of Any Kingdom 15 The Reality of War for a Common Soldier 16 The Chronicle of Bhausahib: Defeat in 1761 of the Marathas at Panipat 16 Tipu Sultan: Visionary Ruler of Mysore 18 The Infl uence of Commerce 20 Bankers and Traders: The Powers Behind the Thrones 21 “Business Men are the Glory and Ornament of the Kingdom” 22 Ananda Ranga Pillai: Merchant and Agent of the French 23 Ghulam Husain Khan: The Nawab of Bengal, the Marathas, and the Jagat Seths 24 Abu Talib: Cultural Comparisons, India Versus the West 26 On the Margins of Power 27 The Sannyasi Uprising 28 Himmat Bahadur, the People’s Hero 29 Religious Expressions, Devotional and Intellectual 30 Ramprasad Sen: Singing to the Goddess in Bengal 31 The Poetry of Nagaridas: Krishna Devotion in Vrindavan 33 Tyagaraja: Telegu Composer
    [Show full text]