Morphology Is Not a Reliable Taxonomic Tool for the Genus Lernaea: Molecular Data and Experimental Infection Reveal That L

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Morphology Is Not a Reliable Taxonomic Tool for the Genus Lernaea: Molecular Data and Experimental Infection Reveal That L Hua et al. Parasites Vectors (2019) 12:579 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-019-3831-y Parasites & Vectors RESEARCH Open Access Morphology is not a reliable taxonomic tool for the genus Lernaea: molecular data and experimental infection reveal that L. cyprinacea and L. cruciata are conspecifc Cong J. Hua1,2, Dong Zhang1,3, Hong Zou1, Ming Li1, Ivan Jakovlić4, Shan G. Wu1, Gui T. Wang1,3 and Wen X. Li1* Abstract Background: Species belonging to the genus Lernaea are cosmopolitan parasites that can infect many diferent freshwater fsh hosts. Due to a high degree of morphological intraspecifc variability and high levels of interspecifc similarities, their classifcation is extremely difcult and controversial. Although the suitability of the shape of cephalic horns has been questioned decades ago by some experimental infection studies, this character still plays the central role in the identifcation of Lernaea spp. Methods: We used the nominal species Lernaea cyprinacea and Lernaea cruciata to test the hypothesis that the shape of the anchor can exhibit host-induced morphological variability, and that the two taxa may be synonymous. Results: We examined 517 wild or farmed specimens of fve host fsh species (four cyprinids and a mosquitofsh), and found that all 16 parasite specimens collected from mosquitofsh could be morphologically identifed as L. cruciata, whereas the remaining 25 parasite specimens were all identifed as L. cyprinacea. We experimentally infected goldfsh and mosquitofsh specimens with ofspring (copepodids) of a single L. cyprinacea specimen: the adult parasites from goldfsh were morphologically identifed as L. cyprinacea, and those from mosquitofsh as L. cruciata. We then used molecular data to corroborate that all these specimens are conspecifc. Conclusions: Our results suggest that L. cyprinacea and L. cruciata may be synonyms, misidentifed as diferent species as a result of host-induced morphological variation. Given the current shortage of molecular data for the genus Lernaea, in order to resolve the taxonomy of this genus (determine the exact number of species), future studies should aim to sequence as much molecular data as possible, and conduct further experimental infections. Keywords: Lernaea, Parasitic copepods, Phenotypic plasticity, Molecular taxonomy Background [1–3], causing lernaeosis, a disease that can cause serious Cosmopolitan parasitic copepods belonging to the pathogenic efects on their hosts. Te taxonomy of this genus Lernaea Linnaeus, 1758 (Cyclopoida: Lernaei- genus is still largely unresolved due to the existence of dae) can infect many diferent freshwater fsh species an exceptionally large number (109) of recorded nominal species [4], a small number of morphological traits useful for species identifcation, a high degree of intraspecifc *Correspondence: [email protected] morphological variability, and a lack of clear morphologi- 1 Key Laboratory of Aquaculture Disease Control, Ministry of Agriculture, cal distinction between some species [5–8]. As a result, and State Key Laboratory of Freshwater Ecology and Biotechnology, Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430072, almost half (48) of the nominal species are believed to be People’s Republic of China synonymous [4]. Full list of author information is available at the end of the article © The Author(s) 2019. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creat iveco mmons .org/licen ses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creat iveco mmons .org/publi cdoma in/ zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. Hua et al. Parasites Vectors (2019) 12:579 Page 2 of 13 Te shape of the cephalic anchors, also known as the a single sufciently reliable tool for the identifcation of “horns” or “antlers”, and their processes, has been tra- Lernaea species at disposal. ditionally used as the most reliable characteristics for Lernaea cruciata Lesueur, 1824, frst reported from taxonomic identifcation of Lernaea spp. [9, 10]. How- the body surface of the rock bass Cichla aenea [17], has ever, experimental infection studies put a major question been subsequently reported from more than a dozen fsh mark over the validity of the prevailing taxonomy of the species [18]. Te anchor of this species is X-shaped, with genus by showing that the anchor exhibits high intraspe- four simple and short arms approximately equal in size. cifc variation [5, 11]. For example, Harding [6] and Fryer Lernaea cyprinacea is the most widely distributed spe- [7] have shown that the growth and orientation of the cies of the genus [19], which also exhibits very low host anchor are afected by the anatomy of the host. As dis- specifcity, infecting a wide range of freshwater fshes, cussed by Fryer [7], Yashouv [12] collected larvae from as well as some amphibians [19, 20], but its anchoring adults settled on one host and then successfully infected apparatus is much more complex. It also has two pairs another fsh species (host not specifed by Fryer) and of arms [21], but the dorsal pair is larger than the ven- tadpoles with these larvae; most of the specimens from tral pair, it branches out into pairs of processes at the tip; carp and bufalo fsh were assignable to L. cyprinacea, but hence, some studies refer to it as the T- or Y-shaped dor- specimens from Gambusia were morphologically notably sal ramifed pair, or as “antlers” [5, 21–23]. For instance, diferent from L. cyprinacea. A subsequent study of Pod- experimental infection trials on Gambusia sp. infected dubnaya (1973) even further casted the shadow of doubt with L. cyprinacea showed a signifcant change in the over the usefulness of the anchor for species identifca- shape of the anchor. In this case, the anchor of L. cypri- tion: when diferent hosts were infected by larvae from nacea specimens developed into the adults which were a single batch of L. elegans (a synonym of L. cyprinacea) similar to those described for L. gobioptera [24] and/or eggs, adult parasites exhibited diferent anchor charac- L. cruciata [17, 25], and not the typical form of L. cypri- teristics, some of which corresponded to other described nacea. However, despite the fact that the evidence for its species of Lernaea [13]. Finally, a recent study [10], used extreme variability was presented several decades ago, 18S and 28S gene fragments to identify four Lernaea perhaps due to the absence of other morphological fea- specimens, which could be assigned to diferent spe- tures that could be used for this purpose, the shape of cies on the basis of their morphology (the authors did the anchor remains commonly used as the most useful not indicate which species), and found that the speci- morphological trait, for the identifcation of Lernaea spe- mens shared a similar genotype, so all were identifed as cies [10, 11, 16, 26–29]. Te issue of reliability of this trait L. cyprinacea. Tese results clearly demonstrate that the has not been revisited in decades, and it has never been anchor characteristics are often merely structural adap- studied using a combination of experimental infection tations of a single parasitic specimen to a diferent host and molecular tools. Our working hypothesis was that L. species, and therefore have very limited reliability for tax- cyprinacea and L. cruciata are synonyms, but the shape onomic purposes. of the anchor is prone to host-induced morphological Although molecular data (partial sequences of 18S and variability, which results in taxonomic misidentifcation. 28S rRNA) have been used in the identifcation of Ler- Tis would also prove that this morphological trait is naea species [10, 11, 14–16], their availability remains not a reliable tool for the identifcation of (at least these extremely limited. To illustrate this, in December 2018 two) Lernaea species. In a preliminary survey, specimens there were only 21 sequences for just two genes (18S and morphologically (anchor) corresponding to L. cyprinacea 28S), and a mitochondrial genome sequence, all belong- were found on four cyprinid fsh species, whereas speci- ing to a single species, L. cyprinacea, available in the mens morphologically corresponding to L. cruciata were GenBank database (Additional fle 1: Table S1). found only on Gambusia holbrooki (the eastern mos- Te reliability of the two single gene-based molecular quitofsh, referred to as mosquitofsh henceforth). To test markers (18S and 28S) that have been traditionally used our hypothesis, and the taxonomic validity of L. cruciata, in the identifcation and phylogenetic studies of Lernaea we infected diferent host species with these specimens, species remains questionable, or at least unconfrmed, and used molecular data to corroborate the identity of largely due to a limited number of studies and limited specimens collected from diferent hosts. amount of molecular data publicly available [10, 16]. Te DNA barcode marker, cox1, has not been used in Methods the identifcation or phylogenetic studies. Terefore, we Sample collection and identifcation of Lernaea cyprinacea can conclude that due to the shortage of molecular data and L. cruciata from wild fshes and the shortcomings of the anchor as a tool for taxon- In 2016 and 2017, we collected 517 fsh specimens omy and identifcation, scientists currently do not have belonging to 5 species (Carassius auratus, Cyprinus Hua et al.
Recommended publications
  • A Global Assessment of Parasite Diversity in Galaxiid Fishes
    diversity Article A Global Assessment of Parasite Diversity in Galaxiid Fishes Rachel A. Paterson 1,*, Gustavo P. Viozzi 2, Carlos A. Rauque 2, Verónica R. Flores 2 and Robert Poulin 3 1 The Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, P.O. Box 5685, Torgarden, 7485 Trondheim, Norway 2 Laboratorio de Parasitología, INIBIOMA, CONICET—Universidad Nacional del Comahue, Quintral 1250, San Carlos de Bariloche 8400, Argentina; [email protected] (G.P.V.); [email protected] (C.A.R.); veronicaroxanafl[email protected] (V.R.F.) 3 Department of Zoology, University of Otago, P.O. Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +47-481-37-867 Abstract: Free-living species often receive greater conservation attention than the parasites they support, with parasite conservation often being hindered by a lack of parasite biodiversity knowl- edge. This study aimed to determine the current state of knowledge regarding parasites of the Southern Hemisphere freshwater fish family Galaxiidae, in order to identify knowledge gaps to focus future research attention. Specifically, we assessed how galaxiid–parasite knowledge differs among geographic regions in relation to research effort (i.e., number of studies or fish individuals examined, extent of tissue examination, taxonomic resolution), in addition to ecological traits known to influ- ence parasite richness. To date, ~50% of galaxiid species have been examined for parasites, though the majority of studies have focused on single parasite taxa rather than assessing the full diversity of macro- and microparasites. The highest number of parasites were observed from Argentinean galaxiids, and studies in all geographic regions were biased towards the highly abundant and most widely distributed galaxiid species, Galaxias maculatus.
    [Show full text]
  • Zootaxa,Crustacean Classification
    Zootaxa 1668: 313–325 (2007) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2007 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) Crustacean classification: on-going controversies and unresolved problems* GEOFF A. BOXSHALL Department of Zoology, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, United Kingdom E-mail: [email protected] *In: Zhang, Z.-Q. & Shear, W.A. (Eds) (2007) Linnaeus Tercentenary: Progress in Invertebrate Taxonomy. Zootaxa, 1668, 1–766. Table of contents Abstract . 313 Introduction . 313 Treatment of parasitic Crustacea . 315 Affinities of the Remipedia . 316 Validity of the Entomostraca . 318 Exopodites and epipodites . 319 Using of larval characters in estimating phylogenetic relationships . 320 Fossils and the crustacean stem lineage . 321 Acknowledgements . 322 References . 322 Abstract The journey from Linnaeus’s original treatment to modern crustacean systematics is briefly characterised. Progress in our understanding of phylogenetic relationships within the Crustacea is linked to continuing discoveries of new taxa, to advances in theory and to improvements in methodology. Six themes are discussed that serve to illustrate some of the major on-going controversies and unresolved problems in the field as well as to illustrate changes that have taken place since the time of Linnaeus. These themes are: 1. the treatment of parasitic Crustacea, 2. the affinities of the Remipedia, 3. the validity of the Entomostraca, 4. exopodites and epipodites, 5. using larval characters in estimating phylogenetic rela- tionships, and 6. fossils and the crustacean stem-lineage. It is concluded that the development of the stem lineage concept for the Crustacea has been dominated by consideration of taxa known only from larval or immature stages.
    [Show full text]
  • Review and Meta-Analysis of the Environmental Biology and Potential Invasiveness of a Poorly-Studied Cyprinid, the Ide Leuciscus Idus
    REVIEWS IN FISHERIES SCIENCE & AQUACULTURE https://doi.org/10.1080/23308249.2020.1822280 REVIEW Review and Meta-Analysis of the Environmental Biology and Potential Invasiveness of a Poorly-Studied Cyprinid, the Ide Leuciscus idus Mehis Rohtlaa,b, Lorenzo Vilizzic, Vladimır Kovacd, David Almeidae, Bernice Brewsterf, J. Robert Brittong, Łukasz Głowackic, Michael J. Godardh,i, Ruth Kirkf, Sarah Nienhuisj, Karin H. Olssonh,k, Jan Simonsenl, Michał E. Skora m, Saulius Stakenas_ n, Ali Serhan Tarkanc,o, Nildeniz Topo, Hugo Verreyckenp, Grzegorz ZieRbac, and Gordon H. Coppc,h,q aEstonian Marine Institute, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia; bInstitute of Marine Research, Austevoll Research Station, Storebø, Norway; cDepartment of Ecology and Vertebrate Zoology, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Lodz, Łod z, Poland; dDepartment of Ecology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia; eDepartment of Basic Medical Sciences, USP-CEU University, Madrid, Spain; fMolecular Parasitology Laboratory, School of Life Sciences, Pharmacy and Chemistry, Kingston University, Kingston-upon-Thames, Surrey, UK; gDepartment of Life and Environmental Sciences, Bournemouth University, Dorset, UK; hCentre for Environment, Fisheries & Aquaculture Science, Lowestoft, Suffolk, UK; iAECOM, Kitchener, Ontario, Canada; jOntario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, Peterborough, Ontario, Canada; kDepartment of Zoology, Tel Aviv University and Inter-University Institute for Marine Sciences in Eilat, Tel Aviv,
    [Show full text]
  • By the Copepod Lernaea Cyprinacea (Crustacea) – Some Ecological Aspects
    Travaux du Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle © 30 Juin Vol. LIV (1) pp. 63–68 «Grigore Antipa» 2011 DOI: 10.2478/v10191-011-0004-4 INFESTATION OF THE PUMPKINSEED LEPOMIS GIBBOSUS (TELEOSTEI: CYPRINIDAE) BY THE COPEPOD LERNAEA CYPRINACEA (CRUSTACEA) – SOME ECOLOGICAL ASPECTS MALA-MARIA STAVRESCU-BEDIVAN, OANA P. POPA, FLORIN T. AIOANEI, LUIS O. POPA Abstract. The copepod Lernaea cyprinacea Linnaeus, 1758 is known by the large spectrum of fish hosts which it infests, and to which it can cause haemorrhages and ulcerations. The paper focuses on some aspects of the relation between the Pumpkinseed sunfish and this copepod: infestation parameters, preferred attaching situs, relationship between the host size and parasitisation degree, as well as the visible effects of this parasite left on the fish body, in the Moara Domneascã Lake, Romania. Résumé. Le copépode Lernaea cyprinacea Linnaeus, 1758 est connu pour son grand spectre de poissons qu’il infeste et auxquels il peut produire des hémorragies ainsi que des ulcérations. Ce travail se concentre sur quelques aspects de la relation entre la perche arc-en-ciel et ce copépode: les paramètres de l’infestation, les sites d’attachement préférés, la relation entre les dimensions du poisson et le degré d’infestation par le parasite, ainsi que les effets visibles provoqués par ce parasite sur la surface du corps du poisson provenant du Lac Moara Domneascã (Roumanie). Key words: infestation, attachment site, Lepomis gibbosus, Lernaea cyprinacea, Moara Domneascã Lake. INTRODUCTION The present study was performed in the frame of a project aimed at the evaluation of the diversity of some ectoparasitic metazoans on the prevalent fish species of the lentic ecosystem from Moara Domneascã.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary Report of Freshwater Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in U.S
    Summary Report of Freshwater Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 4—An Update April 2013 Prepared by: Pam L. Fuller, Amy J. Benson, and Matthew J. Cannister U.S. Geological Survey Southeast Ecological Science Center Gainesville, Florida Prepared for: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Southeast Region Atlanta, Georgia Cover Photos: Silver Carp, Hypophthalmichthys molitrix – Auburn University Giant Applesnail, Pomacea maculata – David Knott Straightedge Crayfish, Procambarus hayi – U.S. Forest Service i Table of Contents Table of Contents ...................................................................................................................................... ii List of Figures ............................................................................................................................................ v List of Tables ............................................................................................................................................ vi INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 1 Overview of Region 4 Introductions Since 2000 ....................................................................................... 1 Format of Species Accounts ...................................................................................................................... 2 Explanation of Maps ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • UCLA UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UCLA UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Macroparasite Study of Cypriniform fishes in the Santa Clara Drainage Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3kp0q16j Author Murray, Max DeLonais Publication Date 2019 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Macroparasite Study of Cypriniform fishes in the Santa Clara Drainage A thesis submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Master of Science in Biology by Max DeLonais Murray 2019 © Copyrite by Max DeLonais Murray 2019 ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS Macroparasite Study of Cypriniform fishes in the Santa Clara Drainage by Max DeLonais Murray Master of Science in Biology University of California, Los Angeles, 2019 Professor Donald G. Buth, Chair Several species of fishes have been introduced into the Santa Clara River system in southern California, including Catostomus santaanae (Santa Ana sucker), Catostomus fumeiventris (Owens sucker), Gila orcutti (arroyo chub), and Pimephales promelas (fathead minnow). These species are known to inhabit similar ecological niches but little is known about their associated parasite fauna. Two C. fumeiventris, 35 C. santaanae, 63 hybrid catostomids, 214 G. orcutti, and 18 P. promelas were collected and necropsied in the summers of 2017 and 2018. Nine macroparasite taxa were harvested including seven native, and two nonnative parasites Schyzocotyle acheilognathi (Asian fish tapeworm) and Lernaea cyprinacea (anchor worm). Prevalence and intensity of parasites were not related to the genetic history of these catostomids. This is the first host-association record for G. orcutti with Gyrodactylus sp., S. acheilognathi, ii diplostomid metacercariae, Rhabdochona sp, Contracaecum sp., and larval acuariid cysts and for P.
    [Show full text]
  • Lernaea Cyprinacea (Copepoda, Lernaeidae) in Argentina
    Bull. Eur. Ass. Fish Pathol., 30(2) 2010, 65 Distribution of the exotic parasite, Lernaea cyprinacea (Copepoda, Lernaeidae) in Argentina S. E. Plaul1,2*, N. García Romero1 and C. G. Barbeito1,2 1 Servicio de Patología de Organismos Acuáticos y Acuicultura. Cátedra de Patología General. Fac. Cs. Veterinarias, UNLP; 2 Cátedra de Histología y Embriología. Fac. Cs. Veterinarias, UNLP. Calle 60 y 118, 1900. La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina Abstract Lernaea cyprinacea Linnaeus is an ectoparasitic copepod that infects the gills and skin of various freshwater fishes and amphibians tadpoles. It is capable of infecting fish at high levels, with high pathogenicity and mortality, mainly during the summer season. Besides the effects of penetration, haemorrhages and ulcerations are also caused. The objective of this study was to investigate the presence of L. cyprinacea in natural bodies of water of Argentina in the provinces of Buenos Aires, Mendoza and Río Negro; the finding of the parasite in Choele-Choel, in the province of Río Negro, is the most austral distribution of its presence. In our study, infections with L. cyprinacea showed a low host specific and they were adapted to a large variety of habitats. Introduction Lernaea cyprinacea Linnaeus (Copepoda, stage (Grabda, 1963; Hoffman, 1999). AVer Lernaeidae), the anchor worm, is an male and female adults mate on the fish host, ectoparasitic copepod that generally infects copulation occurs during the fourth copepodid the gills and skin of various freshwater fishes stage. When the copulation was realized the (Stoskopf, 1993), amphibian tadpoles (Martins males presumably dying while the females and Souza, 1996; Alcalde and Batistoni, 2005) metamorphose and insert the anterior region and the larval stage of axolotl (Carnevia et al., of the body into the host tissue and then 2003).
    [Show full text]
  • Kenai National Wildlife Refuge Species List, Version 2018-07-24
    Kenai National Wildlife Refuge Species List, version 2018-07-24 Kenai National Wildlife Refuge biology staff July 24, 2018 2 Cover image: map of 16,213 georeferenced occurrence records included in the checklist. Contents Contents 3 Introduction 5 Purpose............................................................ 5 About the list......................................................... 5 Acknowledgments....................................................... 5 Native species 7 Vertebrates .......................................................... 7 Invertebrates ......................................................... 55 Vascular Plants........................................................ 91 Bryophytes ..........................................................164 Other Plants .........................................................171 Chromista...........................................................171 Fungi .............................................................173 Protozoans ..........................................................186 Non-native species 187 Vertebrates ..........................................................187 Invertebrates .........................................................187 Vascular Plants........................................................190 Extirpated species 207 Vertebrates ..........................................................207 Vascular Plants........................................................207 Change log 211 References 213 Index 215 3 Introduction Purpose to avoid implying
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Species Delimitation and Biogeography of Canadian Marine Planktonic Crustaceans
    Molecular Species Delimitation and Biogeography of Canadian Marine Planktonic Crustaceans by Robert George Young A Thesis presented to The University of Guelph In partial fulfilment of requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Integrative Biology Guelph, Ontario, Canada © Robert George Young, March, 2016 ABSTRACT MOLECULAR SPECIES DELIMITATION AND BIOGEOGRAPHY OF CANADIAN MARINE PLANKTONIC CRUSTACEANS Robert George Young Advisors: University of Guelph, 2016 Dr. Sarah Adamowicz Dr. Cathryn Abbott Zooplankton are a major component of the marine environment in both diversity and biomass and are a crucial source of nutrients for organisms at higher trophic levels. Unfortunately, marine zooplankton biodiversity is not well known because of difficult morphological identifications and lack of taxonomic experts for many groups. In addition, the large taxonomic diversity present in plankton and low sampling coverage pose challenges in obtaining a better understanding of true zooplankton diversity. Molecular identification tools, like DNA barcoding, have been successfully used to identify marine planktonic specimens to a species. However, the behaviour of methods for specimen identification and species delimitation remain untested for taxonomically diverse and widely-distributed marine zooplanktonic groups. Using Canadian marine planktonic crustacean collections, I generated a multi-gene data set including COI-5P and 18S-V4 molecular markers of morphologically-identified Copepoda and Thecostraca (Multicrustacea: Hexanauplia) species. I used this data set to assess generalities in the genetic divergence patterns and to determine if a barcode gap exists separating interspecific and intraspecific molecular divergences, which can reliably delimit specimens into species. I then used this information to evaluate the North Pacific, Arctic, and North Atlantic biogeography of marine Calanoida (Hexanauplia: Copepoda) plankton.
    [Show full text]
  • Rationales for Animal Species Considered for Species of Conservation Concern, Sequoia National Forest
    Rationales for Animal Species Considered for Species of Conservation Concern Sequoia National Forest Prepared by: Wildlife Biologists and Biologist Planner Regional Office, Sequoia National Forest and Washington Office Enterprise Program For: Sequoia National Forest June 2019 In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992.
    [Show full text]
  • Lernaeid Copepod Parasitic on the Freshwater Fishes of Godavari River, Rajahmundry, Andhra Pradesh, India with Description of a New Species, Lernaea Notopteri N.Sp
    Journal of Applied Life Sciences International 9(3): 1-13, 2016; Article no.JALSI.30123 ISSN: 2394-1103 SCIENCEDOMAIN international www.sciencedomain.org Lernaeid Copepod Parasitic on the Freshwater Fishes of Godavari River, Rajahmundry, Andhra Pradesh, India with Description of a New Species, Lernaea notopteri n.sp. from Notopterus notopterus Anu Prasanna Vankara 1*, Mani Gudivada 2 and Vijayalakshmi Chikkam 3 1Department of Zoology, Yogi Vemana University, Kadapa, 516 003, India. 2Department of Zoology, Maharajah College, Vizianagaram-535 002, India. 3Department of Zoology, Andhra University, Visakhapatnam, 530 003, India. Authors’ contributions This work was carried out in collaboration between all authors. Author APV designed the study, collected the host samples from sampling sites, carried out dissections, collected the parasites and managed the literature searches. Authors MG and VC helped in processing the parasites and preparing the first and final draft of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Article Information DOI: 10.9734/JALSI/2016/30123 Editor(s): (1) Martin Koller, University of Graz, Research Management and Service, c/o Institute of Chemistry, Austria. Reviewers: (1) Asifa Wali, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, India. (2) Daniel Guerreiro Diniz, Universidade Federal do Pará, Brasil. (3) Mauricio Laterça Martins, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Brazil. Complete Peer review History: http://www.sciencedomain.org/review-history/17016 Received 18 th October 2016 Accepted 18 th November 2016 Short Research Article th Published 24 November 2016 ABSTRACT Lernaeid copepods are one of the most detrimental and ubiquitous ectoparasites of cultured and wild variety freshwater fishes. River Godavari offers a dynamic habitat to a wide variety of fishes which are in turn infected by endo and ectoparasites.
    [Show full text]
  • Worms, Germs, and Other Symbionts from the Northern Gulf of Mexico CRCDU7M COPY Sea Grant Depositor
    h ' '' f MASGC-B-78-001 c. 3 A MARINE MALADIES? Worms, Germs, and Other Symbionts From the Northern Gulf of Mexico CRCDU7M COPY Sea Grant Depositor NATIONAL SEA GRANT DEPOSITORY \ PELL LIBRARY BUILDING URI NA8RAGANSETT BAY CAMPUS % NARRAGANSETT. Rl 02882 Robin M. Overstreet r ii MISSISSIPPI—ALABAMA SEA GRANT CONSORTIUM MASGP—78—021 MARINE MALADIES? Worms, Germs, and Other Symbionts From the Northern Gulf of Mexico by Robin M. Overstreet Gulf Coast Research Laboratory Ocean Springs, Mississippi 39564 This study was conducted in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Commerce, NOAA, Office of Sea Grant, under Grant No. 04-7-158-44017 and National Marine Fisheries Service, under PL 88-309, Project No. 2-262-R. TheMississippi-AlabamaSea Grant Consortium furnish ed all of the publication costs. The U.S. Government is authorized to produceand distribute reprints for governmental purposes notwithstanding any copyright notation that may appear hereon. Copyright© 1978by Mississippi-Alabama Sea Gram Consortium and R.M. Overstrect All rights reserved. No pari of this book may be reproduced in any manner without permission from the author. Primed by Blossman Printing, Inc.. Ocean Springs, Mississippi CONTENTS PREFACE 1 INTRODUCTION TO SYMBIOSIS 2 INVERTEBRATES AS HOSTS 5 THE AMERICAN OYSTER 5 Public Health Aspects 6 Dcrmo 7 Other Symbionts and Diseases 8 Shell-Burrowing Symbionts II Fouling Organisms and Predators 13 THE BLUE CRAB 15 Protozoans and Microbes 15 Mclazoans and their I lypeiparasites 18 Misiellaneous Microbes and Protozoans 25 PENAEID
    [Show full text]