Lernaeid Copepod Parasitic on the Freshwater Fishes of Godavari River, Rajahmundry, Andhra Pradesh, India with Description of a New Species, Lernaea Notopteri N.Sp

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Lernaeid Copepod Parasitic on the Freshwater Fishes of Godavari River, Rajahmundry, Andhra Pradesh, India with Description of a New Species, Lernaea Notopteri N.Sp Journal of Applied Life Sciences International 9(3): 1-13, 2016; Article no.JALSI.30123 ISSN: 2394-1103 SCIENCEDOMAIN international www.sciencedomain.org Lernaeid Copepod Parasitic on the Freshwater Fishes of Godavari River, Rajahmundry, Andhra Pradesh, India with Description of a New Species, Lernaea notopteri n.sp. from Notopterus notopterus Anu Prasanna Vankara 1*, Mani Gudivada 2 and Vijayalakshmi Chikkam 3 1Department of Zoology, Yogi Vemana University, Kadapa, 516 003, India. 2Department of Zoology, Maharajah College, Vizianagaram-535 002, India. 3Department of Zoology, Andhra University, Visakhapatnam, 530 003, India. Authors’ contributions This work was carried out in collaboration between all authors. Author APV designed the study, collected the host samples from sampling sites, carried out dissections, collected the parasites and managed the literature searches. Authors MG and VC helped in processing the parasites and preparing the first and final draft of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Article Information DOI: 10.9734/JALSI/2016/30123 Editor(s): (1) Martin Koller, University of Graz, Research Management and Service, c/o Institute of Chemistry, Austria. Reviewers: (1) Asifa Wali, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, India. (2) Daniel Guerreiro Diniz, Universidade Federal do Pará, Brasil. (3) Mauricio Laterça Martins, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Brazil. Complete Peer review History: http://www.sciencedomain.org/review-history/17016 Received 18 th October 2016 Accepted 18 th November 2016 Short Research Article th Published 24 November 2016 ABSTRACT Lernaeid copepods are one of the most detrimental and ubiquitous ectoparasites of cultured and wild variety freshwater fishes. River Godavari offers a dynamic habitat to a wide variety of fishes which are in turn infected by endo and ectoparasites. In a copepod parasitic survey on various species of freshwater fishes of River Godavari, Rajahmundry from 2007-2009, a total of 5 freshwater fishes were parasitized by copepods of the genus Lernaea . Four different adult species of Lernaea were found clinging to the skin of Channa punctatus , Catla catla , Barbus sp. , Macrognathus aculeatus and Notopterus notopterus i.e., Lernaea bengalensis Gnanamuthu, [17], _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ *Corresponding author: E-mail: [email protected], [email protected]; Vankara et al.; JALSI, 9(3): 1-13, 2016; Article no.JALSI.30123 Lernaea cyprinacea Linnaeus, 1758, Lernaea cyprinacea mastacembeli Hu, [13] and a new species, Lernaea notopteri n.sp. The new lerneaid copepod, Lernaea notopteri was reported from Notopterus notopterus showed variations in cephalic arms, antenna, maxillipede and Leg-V from the other closely related species and hence was designated as new species. Keywords: Crustacea; lernaeidae; India; River Godavari; fresh water fish; descriptions; n. sp (new species). 1. INTRODUCTION collected and fixed in 10% formalin. The parasites were identified by keeping them in Ectoparasites in particular, lernaeids are deemed cavity blocks with a few drops of lactic acid for to be one of the most harmful and prevalent 12-24 hrs for clearing. Parasites were observed, ectoparasites of cultured fishes [1]. Lernaeids identified and captured in photographs under commonly known as ‘anchor worms’ are the Lynx trinocular microscope (N-800M). For crustacean copepod parasites infecting a wide detailed study, one parasite from each group was variety of wild caught and pond-raised freshwater dissected; mouthparts and appendages were fishes. Approximately, 110 lernaeid species have separated to draw line diagrams with the been reported under the genus [2]. Damage aid of attached drawing tube in the caused by Lerneids is very severe and can result microscope. Measurements are given in in “Lernaeosis” outbreak infecting major parts of millimetres (mm) with ocular micrometer unless the body such as skin, eyes, gills, fins, mouth otherwise stated. and tissues of infected fishes and results in the mortality of the young fishes [3-6]. Female 3. RESULTS lernaeids are known to be more parasitic in nature as they attack body surface of fish and In the present survey, only 5 freshwater fish were penetrates deep into the tissues after eating fish infected with the copepods of the genus Lernaea . scales forming a deep wounds which in turn Out of four adult species of Lernaea , i.e Lernaea invite secondary microbial infections [7-12]. Many bengalensis Gnanamuthu, [17] from Channa scientists all over world focused on the severity, punctatus , Lernaea cyprinacea Linnaeus, 1758 pathogenicity and diversity of lernaeid parasites from Catla catla and Barbus sp. , Lernaea infesting various freshwater fishes [2,3,13-32]. cyprinacea mastacembeli Hu, [13] from Also, few scientists added a note on the life- Macrognathus aculeatus are redescriptions while history of lernaeid parasites [15,33-35]. River Lernaea notopteri n. sp. found adhered to the Godavari is known for its dynamic environment, skin of Notopterus notopterus is reported as new enriched by the nutrients proved to be a highly species and is described in detail. The diversity productive and prospective field to accomplish parameters of each lernaeid species is detailed fishery research. Godavari River inhabits a in Table 5. diversified array of teleostean fauna which in turn offer a diversified range of habitat to the Family : Lernaeidae Cobbold, 1879 metazoan parasitic fauna. This study aims to Genus : Lernaea Linnaeus, [38] analyse the lernaeid copepods keeping the severity of the infection in view caused by these Lernaea bengalensis Gnanamuthu, [17] parasites on the freshwater fishes of River (Plate-1: Figs. 1-10; Tables 1 and 5) Godavari, Rajahmundry. Host: Channa punctatus Bloch 2. MATERIALS AND METHODS Site of infection: skin of the fish near dorsal, anal Fish were collected from fishery locations and and pectoral fins local markets near River Godavari, Rajahmundry, Andhra Pradesh during 2007-2009 Locality: Godavari River, Rajahmundry, Andhra and were brought to the laboratory for thorough Pradesh examination of skin and gills. The skin and gill filaments were carefully washed and teased, and Description (based on 38 specimens): the contents were observed under a stereo microscope (LM-52-3621 Elegant). Standard Body (4.52-5.11) elongate, cylindrical, straight. protocols were followed to preserve and identify Body well-marked into head, neck, trunk and the parasites [36,37]. Copepod parasites were abdomen. Head (0.21-0.28) covered by sub- 2 Vankara et al.; JALSI, 9(3): 1-13, 2016; Article no.JALSI.30123 elliptical lobe, fused all around. Mouth parts Host: Catla catla ., Barbus sp. covered by lobe. First thoracic segment fused with the head and is the broadest part of the Site of infection: Skin body, extends laterally into four unbranched, simple cephalic arms which appear as ‘X’ when Locality: Godavari River, Rajahmundry, Andhra viewed from the front. Anterior arms shorter than Pradesh posterior. Cephalic arms 1.18-2.01. Posterior region of first segment with first pair of legs Description (based on 12 specimens): curved towards each other. Neck uniformly slender, cylindrical and bears second and third Total body 4.58-4.78. Head circular, projects out pair of legs. Trunk (3.42-3.56) is the longest part from the body in the form of a protruberance. of the body, broadens posteriorly and bulges to Head (0.17-0.18 x 0.15-0.16) fused all around. form genital region and bears fourth and First thoracic segment fused with cephalon and fifth legs. Two large round swellings pressed is the broadest part of the body, extending together form ‘heel’ known as pregenital laterally into four bifid cephalic arms. Cephalic prominces lodge the egg sacs. Abdomen arms in the form of ‘X’ when viewed from the (0.85-0.98) cylindrical, squarish or slightly front. Anterior arms (0.30-0.45 x 0.20) shorter round bears two anal laminae. Lamina than posterior arms (0.50 x 0.20). Posterior (0.21-0.25) two segmented, basal, naked; distal region of the first segment bears first pair of legs with three short spines and a long seta. First which curve towards each other between the two antenna : 5-segmented; basal short with one seta ventro-lateral arms. Neck or free thorax slender, on the outer distal corner, second segment with a cylindrical bearing second and third pairs of legs. long seta and few short setae on the outer Behind the third pair starts the trunk, to form margin; third segment naked; fourth with a long, genital region and bears fourth and fifth pair of blunt seta on the distal margin and distal legs. Abdomen (0.52-0.55 x 0.34-0.36) with three setae on the inner margin and few cylindrical. Posterior tip of abdomen bears to setae apically. Second antenna : 3-segmented, elongated, small, conical anal laminae. Each basal short and naked; middle longer than lamina (0.20-0.22) with a long seta and two short basal and naked and distal curved to a blunt spine like setae. First antenna : 4-segmented, terminal claw and with setae apically. Maxillule : basal naked, second segment large and broad First maxilla not clearly visible. Maxilla: 2- with numerous setae scattered on the outer segmented, basal broad and short; distal curved margin; third segment with one seta on the inner to a blunt claw. Maxilliped : Two-segmented, distal margin; distal with one seta on the outer basal short, naked and distal long, with five margin, three setae on the inner margin and a terminal claws, a blunt process and a conical tuft of setae apically. Second antenna : Three- process with short setae on the inner medial segmented; basal and second segment naked, margin. Legs I to IV biramous; with three- distal long and slender terminally curved to a segmented exopod and endopod. Of the four blunt spine with three setae on the inner margin pairs of thoracic legs, the first pair occurs on the and few setae apically. Maxillule : First maxilla not first thoracic segment fused with head, while the clearly visible.
Recommended publications
  • A Global Assessment of Parasite Diversity in Galaxiid Fishes
    diversity Article A Global Assessment of Parasite Diversity in Galaxiid Fishes Rachel A. Paterson 1,*, Gustavo P. Viozzi 2, Carlos A. Rauque 2, Verónica R. Flores 2 and Robert Poulin 3 1 The Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, P.O. Box 5685, Torgarden, 7485 Trondheim, Norway 2 Laboratorio de Parasitología, INIBIOMA, CONICET—Universidad Nacional del Comahue, Quintral 1250, San Carlos de Bariloche 8400, Argentina; [email protected] (G.P.V.); [email protected] (C.A.R.); veronicaroxanafl[email protected] (V.R.F.) 3 Department of Zoology, University of Otago, P.O. Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +47-481-37-867 Abstract: Free-living species often receive greater conservation attention than the parasites they support, with parasite conservation often being hindered by a lack of parasite biodiversity knowl- edge. This study aimed to determine the current state of knowledge regarding parasites of the Southern Hemisphere freshwater fish family Galaxiidae, in order to identify knowledge gaps to focus future research attention. Specifically, we assessed how galaxiid–parasite knowledge differs among geographic regions in relation to research effort (i.e., number of studies or fish individuals examined, extent of tissue examination, taxonomic resolution), in addition to ecological traits known to influ- ence parasite richness. To date, ~50% of galaxiid species have been examined for parasites, though the majority of studies have focused on single parasite taxa rather than assessing the full diversity of macro- and microparasites. The highest number of parasites were observed from Argentinean galaxiids, and studies in all geographic regions were biased towards the highly abundant and most widely distributed galaxiid species, Galaxias maculatus.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Health Better Management Practices for Murray Cod Farming. (Version 1.0)
    Fish Health Better Management Practices for Murray Cod farming. (Version 1.0) Brett Ingram, Geoff Gooley, Tracey Bradley, Huiking Ho, Shari Cohen August 2012 Fisheries Victoria Technical Report Series 76 Murray Cod Fish Health BMP If you would like to receive this Printed by DPI Queenscliff, Victoria information/publication in an Published by the Department of Primary accessible format (such as large Industries. print or audio) please call the Copies are available from the website: Customer Service Centre on: www.dpi.vic.gov.au/fishing 136 186, TTY: 1800 122 969, General disclaimer This publication may be of assistance to you but or email the State of Victoria and its employees do not [email protected] guarantee that the publication is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your Copyright © The State of Victoria, Department of particular purposes and therefore disclaims all Primary Industries, 2012. liability for any error, loss or other consequence which may arise from you relying on any This publication is copyright. No part may be information in this publication reproduced by any process except in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. The information contained in this publication is for general information only. The State of Preferred way to cite: Victoria does not expressly or impliedly Ingram B, Gooley G, Bradley T, Ho H, Cohen S guarantee that the proposed chemical treatments (2012). Fish health better management practices contained within this publication will be wholly for Murray cod farming. Version 1.0. Fisheries appropriate for your situation. The proposed Victoria Technical Report No.
    [Show full text]
  • Review and Meta-Analysis of the Environmental Biology and Potential Invasiveness of a Poorly-Studied Cyprinid, the Ide Leuciscus Idus
    REVIEWS IN FISHERIES SCIENCE & AQUACULTURE https://doi.org/10.1080/23308249.2020.1822280 REVIEW Review and Meta-Analysis of the Environmental Biology and Potential Invasiveness of a Poorly-Studied Cyprinid, the Ide Leuciscus idus Mehis Rohtlaa,b, Lorenzo Vilizzic, Vladimır Kovacd, David Almeidae, Bernice Brewsterf, J. Robert Brittong, Łukasz Głowackic, Michael J. Godardh,i, Ruth Kirkf, Sarah Nienhuisj, Karin H. Olssonh,k, Jan Simonsenl, Michał E. Skora m, Saulius Stakenas_ n, Ali Serhan Tarkanc,o, Nildeniz Topo, Hugo Verreyckenp, Grzegorz ZieRbac, and Gordon H. Coppc,h,q aEstonian Marine Institute, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia; bInstitute of Marine Research, Austevoll Research Station, Storebø, Norway; cDepartment of Ecology and Vertebrate Zoology, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Lodz, Łod z, Poland; dDepartment of Ecology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia; eDepartment of Basic Medical Sciences, USP-CEU University, Madrid, Spain; fMolecular Parasitology Laboratory, School of Life Sciences, Pharmacy and Chemistry, Kingston University, Kingston-upon-Thames, Surrey, UK; gDepartment of Life and Environmental Sciences, Bournemouth University, Dorset, UK; hCentre for Environment, Fisheries & Aquaculture Science, Lowestoft, Suffolk, UK; iAECOM, Kitchener, Ontario, Canada; jOntario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, Peterborough, Ontario, Canada; kDepartment of Zoology, Tel Aviv University and Inter-University Institute for Marine Sciences in Eilat, Tel Aviv,
    [Show full text]
  • By the Copepod Lernaea Cyprinacea (Crustacea) – Some Ecological Aspects
    Travaux du Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle © 30 Juin Vol. LIV (1) pp. 63–68 «Grigore Antipa» 2011 DOI: 10.2478/v10191-011-0004-4 INFESTATION OF THE PUMPKINSEED LEPOMIS GIBBOSUS (TELEOSTEI: CYPRINIDAE) BY THE COPEPOD LERNAEA CYPRINACEA (CRUSTACEA) – SOME ECOLOGICAL ASPECTS MALA-MARIA STAVRESCU-BEDIVAN, OANA P. POPA, FLORIN T. AIOANEI, LUIS O. POPA Abstract. The copepod Lernaea cyprinacea Linnaeus, 1758 is known by the large spectrum of fish hosts which it infests, and to which it can cause haemorrhages and ulcerations. The paper focuses on some aspects of the relation between the Pumpkinseed sunfish and this copepod: infestation parameters, preferred attaching situs, relationship between the host size and parasitisation degree, as well as the visible effects of this parasite left on the fish body, in the Moara Domneascã Lake, Romania. Résumé. Le copépode Lernaea cyprinacea Linnaeus, 1758 est connu pour son grand spectre de poissons qu’il infeste et auxquels il peut produire des hémorragies ainsi que des ulcérations. Ce travail se concentre sur quelques aspects de la relation entre la perche arc-en-ciel et ce copépode: les paramètres de l’infestation, les sites d’attachement préférés, la relation entre les dimensions du poisson et le degré d’infestation par le parasite, ainsi que les effets visibles provoqués par ce parasite sur la surface du corps du poisson provenant du Lac Moara Domneascã (Roumanie). Key words: infestation, attachment site, Lepomis gibbosus, Lernaea cyprinacea, Moara Domneascã Lake. INTRODUCTION The present study was performed in the frame of a project aimed at the evaluation of the diversity of some ectoparasitic metazoans on the prevalent fish species of the lentic ecosystem from Moara Domneascã.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary Report of Freshwater Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in U.S
    Summary Report of Freshwater Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 4—An Update April 2013 Prepared by: Pam L. Fuller, Amy J. Benson, and Matthew J. Cannister U.S. Geological Survey Southeast Ecological Science Center Gainesville, Florida Prepared for: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Southeast Region Atlanta, Georgia Cover Photos: Silver Carp, Hypophthalmichthys molitrix – Auburn University Giant Applesnail, Pomacea maculata – David Knott Straightedge Crayfish, Procambarus hayi – U.S. Forest Service i Table of Contents Table of Contents ...................................................................................................................................... ii List of Figures ............................................................................................................................................ v List of Tables ............................................................................................................................................ vi INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 1 Overview of Region 4 Introductions Since 2000 ....................................................................................... 1 Format of Species Accounts ...................................................................................................................... 2 Explanation of Maps ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Lernaea Cyprinacea (Copepoda, Lernaeidae) in Argentina
    Bull. Eur. Ass. Fish Pathol., 30(2) 2010, 65 Distribution of the exotic parasite, Lernaea cyprinacea (Copepoda, Lernaeidae) in Argentina S. E. Plaul1,2*, N. García Romero1 and C. G. Barbeito1,2 1 Servicio de Patología de Organismos Acuáticos y Acuicultura. Cátedra de Patología General. Fac. Cs. Veterinarias, UNLP; 2 Cátedra de Histología y Embriología. Fac. Cs. Veterinarias, UNLP. Calle 60 y 118, 1900. La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina Abstract Lernaea cyprinacea Linnaeus is an ectoparasitic copepod that infects the gills and skin of various freshwater fishes and amphibians tadpoles. It is capable of infecting fish at high levels, with high pathogenicity and mortality, mainly during the summer season. Besides the effects of penetration, haemorrhages and ulcerations are also caused. The objective of this study was to investigate the presence of L. cyprinacea in natural bodies of water of Argentina in the provinces of Buenos Aires, Mendoza and Río Negro; the finding of the parasite in Choele-Choel, in the province of Río Negro, is the most austral distribution of its presence. In our study, infections with L. cyprinacea showed a low host specific and they were adapted to a large variety of habitats. Introduction Lernaea cyprinacea Linnaeus (Copepoda, stage (Grabda, 1963; Hoffman, 1999). AVer Lernaeidae), the anchor worm, is an male and female adults mate on the fish host, ectoparasitic copepod that generally infects copulation occurs during the fourth copepodid the gills and skin of various freshwater fishes stage. When the copulation was realized the (Stoskopf, 1993), amphibian tadpoles (Martins males presumably dying while the females and Souza, 1996; Alcalde and Batistoni, 2005) metamorphose and insert the anterior region and the larval stage of axolotl (Carnevia et al., of the body into the host tissue and then 2003).
    [Show full text]
  • Rationales for Animal Species Considered for Species of Conservation Concern, Sequoia National Forest
    Rationales for Animal Species Considered for Species of Conservation Concern Sequoia National Forest Prepared by: Wildlife Biologists and Biologist Planner Regional Office, Sequoia National Forest and Washington Office Enterprise Program For: Sequoia National Forest June 2019 In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992.
    [Show full text]
  • Aquatic Nuisance Species Management Plan
    NORTH CAROLINA ria ut N e Mystery er Prim es S Wat ros in na e Ch il Aquatic ish F on Nuisance Li rn Sna Species Nor the kehead Marbled Cray fish Hydrill a h Spo fis tted Jelly MANAGEMENT PLAN NORTH CAROLINA AQUATIC NUISANCE SPECIES MANAGEMENT PLAN Prepared by the NC Aquatic Nuisance Species Management Plan Committee October 1, 2015 Approved by: Steve Troxler, Commissioner North Carolina Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services Donald R. van der Vaart, Secretary North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Gordon Myers, Executive Director North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements Executive Summary I. Introduction .....................................................................................................................................................................................................................1 The difference between Aquatic Invasive Species (AIS) and Aquatic Nuisance Species (ANS) ................................................................5 Plan Purpose, Scope and Development ............................................................................................................................................................................. 5 Aquatic Invasive Species Vectors and Impacts ............................................................................................................................................................... 6 Interactions with Other Plan ................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • And Argulus Sp
    生物圏科学 Biosphere Sci. 54:71-74 (2015) Lernaea cyprinacea (Copepoda: Lernaeidae) and Argulus sp. (Branchiura: Argulidae) parasitic on the freshwater goby Rhinogobius sp. TO endemic to Japan 1) 2) Kazuya NAGASAWA * and Ryo-ichi TORII 1) Graduate School of Biosphere Science, Hiroshima University, 1-4-4 Kagamiyama, Higashi-Hiroshima, Hiroshima 739-8528, Japan 2) Mikawa Freshwater Life Network, B101 Plaza Verde, 1-3-1 Fudaki, Hekinan, Aichi, 447-0088, Japan Abstract The freshwater goby, Rhinogobius sp. TO, is endemic to Japan and occurs only in the Tokai District, central Honshu, Japan. The lernaeid copepod, Lernaea cyprinacea Linnaeus, 1758, and the argulid branchiuran, Argulus sp., were collected from specimens of this goby in Aichi Prefecture. These crustaceans are the first parasites found from Rhinogobius sp. TO. Key words: Argulus sp., Branchiura, Copepoda, fish parasite, Lernaea cyprinacea, Rhinogobius sp. TO INTRODUCTION The genus Rhinogobius (Perciformes: Gobioidei) is a specious gobiid group and currently consists of 17 valid species in Japan (Akihito et al., 2013). Some species of this genus, however, have not yet been identified at specific level, and tentative scientific names have been used for them. Rhinogobius sp. TO is an example of such use, and “TO” is used because the distribution of the species is restricted to the Tokai District, central Honshu (Suzuki and Sakamoto, 2005), where it occurs in four prefectures (Gifu, Mie, Aichi, and Shizuoka) (Suzuki and Mukai, 2010; Akihito et al., 2013). To date, no parasite has been reported from this goby. Recently, two species of crustacean parasites, Lernaea cyprinacea Linnaeus, 1758 (Copepoda: Lernaeidae) and Argulus sp.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishery Bulletin of the Fish and Wildlife Service V.62
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, Stewart L. Udall, Secretary FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, Clarence F. Pautzke, Commissioner BUREAU OF COMMERCIAL FISHERIES, Donald L. McKernan, Director BIBLIOGRAPHY ,ON THE BIOLOGY 'OF THE COD Gadus morhua AND RELATED SPECIES By JOHN P. WISE FISHERY BULLETIN 215 From Fishery Bulletin ~f the Fish and Wildlife Service VOLUME 62 Published by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service _ Washinl1ton Printed at the U.S. Government PrlntlnQ Office _ WashinQton,1963 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government PrlntlnQ Office, WashlnQton 25, D.C. - Price 40 cents Created in 1849, the Department of the Interior-America's Department of Nattu'nl Resources-is eoncerned with the management, eonservation, and development of the Nation's water, fish, wildlife, mineral, forest, and park and reereational resotu'ces. It also has rililjor responsibilities for Indian and Territorial affairs. As the Nation's principal conservation ageney, the Department works to assure that nonrenewable resow'ces fire developed and used wisely, that park and reCl'eational resources n.re conserved for the future, and that renewable resources mn.ke their full contribution to the progress, prosperity, and security of the United States-now and in the future, II CONTENTS Page Introduction_______________________________________________________________ 483 Bibliography_______________________________________________________________ 484 Index by subjects ~________________________________ 535 Index by geographical areas__ ____ _______ ____ _____________ ____________________ 537 AddClldum __ - ._______ ____ ___ ___ _ 538 III ABSTRACT A bibliography of 1,020 references on the biology of the cod, Gadu8 morhua L., and related species of North American members of the genus Gadu8 whichis reasonably complete through 1959.
    [Show full text]
  • Juvenile Lost River and Shortnose Sucker Year Class Strength
    Juvenile Lost River and Shortnose Sucker Year Class Strength, Survival, and Growth in Upper Klamath Lake, Oregon, and Clear Lake Reservoir, California: 2016 Monitoring Report Open-File Report 2018–1066 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover: Photograph showing Upper Klamath Lake, Oregon in July with a cyanobacterial bloom. Photograph taken from Modoc Rim on the eastern shore looking to the northwest. Photograph from U.S. Geological Survey. Juvenile Lost River and Shortnose Sucker Year Class Strength, Survival, and Growth in Upper Klamath Lake, Oregon, and Clear Lake Reservoir, California—2016 Monitoring Report By Summer M. Burdick, Carl O. Ostberg, and Marshal S. Hoy Open-File Report 2018–1066 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior RYAN K. ZINKE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey William H. Werkheiser, Deputy Director exercising the authority of the Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2018 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit https://www.usgs.gov/ or call 1–888–ASK–USGS (1–888–275–8747). For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit https://store.usgs.gov. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text. Permission to reproduce copyrighted items must be secured from the copyright owner.
    [Show full text]
  • New Host Records for Lernaea Cyprinacea (Copepoda), a Parasite of Freshwater Fishes, with a Checklist of the Lernaeidae in Japan (1915-2007)
    J. Grad. Sch. Biosp. Sci. Hiroshima Univ. (2007), 46:21~33 New Host Records for Lernaea cyprinacea (Copepoda), a Parasite of Freshwater Fishes, with a Checklist of the Lernaeidae in Japan (1915-2007) Kazuya Nagasawa, Akiko Inoue, Su Myat and Tetsuya Umino Graduate School of Biosphere Science, Hiroshima University 1-4-4 Kagamiyama, Higashi-Hiroshima, Hiroshima 739-8528, Japan Abstract The lernaeid copepod Lernaea cyprinacea Linnaeus, 1758, was found attached to three species of freshwater fishes, the barbell steed Hemibarbus labeo (Pallas) (Cyprinidae), the dark chub Zacco temminckii (Temminck and Schlegel) (Cyprinidae), and the Amur catfish Silurus asotus Linnaeus (Siluridae) from Hiroshima Prefecture in Japan. The findings from Hemibarbus labeo and Zacco temminckii represent new host records for L. cyprinacea, while Silurus asotus is a new host in Japan. Based on the literature published for 93 years from 1915 to 2007, a checklist of three species of lernaeid copepods (Lernaea cyprinacea, Lernaea parasiluri, Lamproglena chinensis) from Japan is given, including information on the synonym(s), host(s), site(s) of infection, and distribution. The checklist shows that in Japan L. cyprinacea has been reported from 33 or 34 species and subspecies of fishes belonging to 17 families in 10 orders and also from 2 species of amphibians from 2 families in 2 orders. Key words: Lamproglena chinensis; Lernaea cyprinacea; Lernaea parasiluri; Lernaeidae; parasites; new hosts INTRODUCTION The lernaeid copepod Lernaea cyprinacea Linnaeus, 1758, often called the anchor worm, is a parasite of freshwater fishes in various regions of the world (Kabata, 1979; Lester and Hayward, 2006). The anterior part of the body of metamorphosed adult female is embedded in the host tissue, whereas the remaining body protrudes in the water.
    [Show full text]