DOCSLIB.ORG

Fish Health Better Management Practices for Murray Cod Farming. (Version 1.0)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fish Health Better Management Practices for Murray Cod Farming. (Version 1.0) Fish Health Better Management Practices for Murray Cod farming. (Version 1.0) Brett Ingram, Geoff Gooley, Tracey Bradley, Huiking Ho, Shari Cohen August 2012 Fisheries Victoria Technical Report Series 76 Murray Cod Fish Health BMP If you would like to receive this Printed by DPI Queenscliff, Victoria information/publication in an Published by the Department of Primary accessible format (such as large Industries. print or audio) please call the Copies are available from the website: Customer Service Centre on: www.dpi.vic.gov.au/fishing 136 186, TTY: 1800 122 969, General disclaimer This publication may be of assistance to you but or email the State of Victoria and its employees do not [email protected] guarantee that the publication is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your Copyright © The State of Victoria, Department of particular purposes and therefore disclaims all Primary Industries, 2012. liability for any error, loss or other consequence which may arise from you relying on any This publication is copyright. No part may be information in this publication reproduced by any process except in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. The information contained in this publication is for general information only. The State of Preferred way to cite: Victoria does not expressly or impliedly Ingram B, Gooley G, Bradley T, Ho H, Cohen S guarantee that the proposed chemical treatments (2012). Fish health better management practices contained within this publication will be wholly for Murray cod farming. Version 1.0. Fisheries appropriate for your situation. The proposed Victoria Technical Report No. 76. Department of chemical treatments are drawn from a range of Primary Industries, Queenscliff, Victoria, sources, including common farming practices Australia. 60 pp. and are not intended to be a substitute for ISSN 1835‐4785 professional veterinary advice. The appropriateness of the proposed chemical ISBN 978‐1‐74326‐262‐7 (Print) treatments will depend on the circumstances in Author Contact Details: which they are intended to be used. It is Brett Ingram recommended that you seek professional Fisheries Research Branch, Fisheries Victoria veterinary advice before adopting and PO Box 114, Queenscliff Victoria 3225 implementing any chemical treatment options for managing fish health in Murray Cod. Authorised by the Victorian Government, 2a Bellarine Hwy, Queenscliff, Victoria 3225 Murray Cod Fish Health BMP ii Executive Summary The Murray cod aquaculture industry has been developing slowly across the eastern states of Australia in recent years. This iconic, threatened fish has excellent aquaculture prospects and small quantities are already sold into domestic markets. The production of fingerlings for stock enhancement purposes has been established commercially since the 1980s. More recently a range of different culture techniques have been established for growout including cages in ponds and free ranging in pond systems. These systems are particularly well suited to horticultural enterprises with large water holdings as a means of adding value to a valuable water resource. Previous work has established that, like all aquaculture species, there are a range of health conditions affecting Murray cod that can result in loss of income in culture systems. Anecdotally it appears that parasites in particular pose a threat to the healthy production of Murray cod in open systems. However more work needs to be undertaken in the documentation and rigorous identification of these disease threats. The purpose of this “Better Management Practices” manual is to provide farmers with a practical and evolving resource that can assist them in addressing the myriad of health problems that can affect Murray cod, including disease agents and environmental factors. This manual is supported by a series of Standard Operating Procedures and Appendices that cover a diverse range of subjects. Where this BMP does provide information on available chemical treatments for common parasites, diseases and conditions that affect the health of Murray cod in aquaculture, those treatments are drawn from a range of sources, including common farming practices, and are not intended to be a substitute for professional veterinary advice. It is recommended that professional veterinary advice is sought before adopting and implementing any chemical treatment options for managing fish health in Murray cod. Murray Cod Fish Health BMP iii Table of Contents Executive Summary............................................................................................. iii Introduction............................................................................................................ 1 Fish health and aquaculture ....................................................................................................................................1 Murray cod aquaculture ...........................................................................................................................................1 Better management practices...................................................................................................................................2 Standard Operating Procedures..............................................................................................................................2 Objectives of this BMP.............................................................................................................................................2 Murray cod aquaculture industry ...................................................................... 4 Industry overview......................................................................................................................................................4 Hatchery Phase........................................................................................................................................................4 Nursery Phase .........................................................................................................................................................5 Grow‐out Phase.......................................................................................................................................................5 Markets.....................................................................................................................................................................5 Murray cod industry health survey........................................................................................................................5 Common health problems in farmed Murray cod.......................................... 7 Infectious diseases and parasites............................................................................................................................7 Sources of infectious diseases and parasites .......................................................................................................7 Protozoan parasites....................................................................................................................................................7 1. Chilodonella ...........................................................................................................................................................7 2. Ichthyophthirius multifiliis, (Ich or whitespot) ..................................................................................................9 3. Trichodina..............................................................................................................................................................9 4. Tetrahymena..........................................................................................................................................................9 5. Ichthyobodo necator (Costia necatrix) ...................................................................................................................9 Other protozoan parasites .....................................................................................................................................9 Copepod parasites ...................................................................................................................................................12 1. Lernaea spp (anchor worm)..............................................................................................................................12 2. Ergasilid copepods ...........................................................................................................................................12 Fungi ..........................................................................................................................................................................13 1. Aphanomyces invadans .......................................................................................................................................13 2. Saprolegniosis......................................................................................................................................................13 Viruses .......................................................................................................................................................................15 1. Megalocytivirus...................................................................................................................................................15 Bacteria...................................................................................................................................................................15
Load more

Recommended publications
  • By the Copepod Lernaea Cyprinacea (Crustacea) – Some Ecological Aspects
    Travaux du Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle © 30 Juin Vol. LIV (1) pp. 63–68 «Grigore Antipa» 2011 DOI: 10.2478/v10191-011-0004-4 INFESTATION OF THE PUMPKINSEED LEPOMIS GIBBOSUS (TELEOSTEI: CYPRINIDAE) BY THE COPEPOD LERNAEA CYPRINACEA (CRUSTACEA) – SOME ECOLOGICAL ASPECTS MALA-MARIA STAVRESCU-BEDIVAN, OANA P. POPA, FLORIN T. AIOANEI, LUIS O. POPA Abstract. The copepod Lernaea cyprinacea Linnaeus, 1758 is known by the large spectrum of fish hosts which it infests, and to which it can cause haemorrhages and ulcerations. The paper focuses on some aspects of the relation between the Pumpkinseed sunfish and this copepod: infestation parameters, preferred attaching situs, relationship between the host size and parasitisation degree, as well as the visible effects of this parasite left on the fish body, in the Moara Domneascã Lake, Romania. Résumé. Le copépode Lernaea cyprinacea Linnaeus, 1758 est connu pour son grand spectre de poissons qu’il infeste et auxquels il peut produire des hémorragies ainsi que des ulcérations. Ce travail se concentre sur quelques aspects de la relation entre la perche arc-en-ciel et ce copépode: les paramètres de l’infestation, les sites d’attachement préférés, la relation entre les dimensions du poisson et le degré d’infestation par le parasite, ainsi que les effets visibles provoqués par ce parasite sur la surface du corps du poisson provenant du Lac Moara Domneascã (Roumanie). Key words: infestation, attachment site, Lepomis gibbosus, Lernaea cyprinacea, Moara Domneascã Lake. INTRODUCTION The present study was performed in the frame of a project aimed at the evaluation of the diversity of some ectoparasitic metazoans on the prevalent fish species of the lentic ecosystem from Moara Domneascã.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary Report of Freshwater Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in U.S
    Summary Report of Freshwater Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 4—An Update April 2013 Prepared by: Pam L. Fuller, Amy J. Benson, and Matthew J. Cannister U.S. Geological Survey Southeast Ecological Science Center Gainesville, Florida Prepared for: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Southeast Region Atlanta, Georgia Cover Photos: Silver Carp, Hypophthalmichthys molitrix – Auburn University Giant Applesnail, Pomacea maculata – David Knott Straightedge Crayfish, Procambarus hayi – U.S. Forest Service i Table of Contents Table of Contents ...................................................................................................................................... ii List of Figures ............................................................................................................................................ v List of Tables ............................................................................................................................................ vi INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 1 Overview of Region 4 Introductions Since 2000 ....................................................................................... 1 Format of Species Accounts ...................................................................................................................... 2 Explanation of Maps ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Lernaea Cyprinacea (Copepoda, Lernaeidae) in Argentina
    Bull. Eur. Ass. Fish Pathol., 30(2) 2010, 65 Distribution of the exotic parasite, Lernaea cyprinacea (Copepoda, Lernaeidae) in Argentina S. E. Plaul1,2*, N. García Romero1 and C. G. Barbeito1,2 1 Servicio de Patología de Organismos Acuáticos y Acuicultura. Cátedra de Patología General. Fac. Cs. Veterinarias, UNLP; 2 Cátedra de Histología y Embriología. Fac. Cs. Veterinarias, UNLP. Calle 60 y 118, 1900. La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina Abstract Lernaea cyprinacea Linnaeus is an ectoparasitic copepod that infects the gills and skin of various freshwater fishes and amphibians tadpoles. It is capable of infecting fish at high levels, with high pathogenicity and mortality, mainly during the summer season. Besides the effects of penetration, haemorrhages and ulcerations are also caused. The objective of this study was to investigate the presence of L. cyprinacea in natural bodies of water of Argentina in the provinces of Buenos Aires, Mendoza and Río Negro; the finding of the parasite in Choele-Choel, in the province of Río Negro, is the most austral distribution of its presence. In our study, infections with L. cyprinacea showed a low host specific and they were adapted to a large variety of habitats. Introduction Lernaea cyprinacea Linnaeus (Copepoda, stage (Grabda, 1963; Hoffman, 1999). AVer Lernaeidae), the anchor worm, is an male and female adults mate on the fish host, ectoparasitic copepod that generally infects copulation occurs during the fourth copepodid the gills and skin of various freshwater fishes stage. When the copulation was realized the (Stoskopf, 1993), amphibian tadpoles (Martins males presumably dying while the females and Souza, 1996; Alcalde and Batistoni, 2005) metamorphose and insert the anterior region and the larval stage of axolotl (Carnevia et al., of the body into the host tissue and then 2003).
    [Show full text]
  • Lernaeid Copepod Parasitic on the Freshwater Fishes of Godavari River, Rajahmundry, Andhra Pradesh, India with Description of a New Species, Lernaea Notopteri N.Sp
    Journal of Applied Life Sciences International 9(3): 1-13, 2016; Article no.JALSI.30123 ISSN: 2394-1103 SCIENCEDOMAIN international www.sciencedomain.org Lernaeid Copepod Parasitic on the Freshwater Fishes of Godavari River, Rajahmundry, Andhra Pradesh, India with Description of a New Species, Lernaea notopteri n.sp. from Notopterus notopterus Anu Prasanna Vankara 1*, Mani Gudivada 2 and Vijayalakshmi Chikkam 3 1Department of Zoology, Yogi Vemana University, Kadapa, 516 003, India. 2Department of Zoology, Maharajah College, Vizianagaram-535 002, India. 3Department of Zoology, Andhra University, Visakhapatnam, 530 003, India. Authors’ contributions This work was carried out in collaboration between all authors. Author APV designed the study, collected the host samples from sampling sites, carried out dissections, collected the parasites and managed the literature searches. Authors MG and VC helped in processing the parasites and preparing the first and final draft of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Article Information DOI: 10.9734/JALSI/2016/30123 Editor(s): (1) Martin Koller, University of Graz, Research Management and Service, c/o Institute of Chemistry, Austria. Reviewers: (1) Asifa Wali, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, India. (2) Daniel Guerreiro Diniz, Universidade Federal do Pará, Brasil. (3) Mauricio Laterça Martins, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Brazil. Complete Peer review History: http://www.sciencedomain.org/review-history/17016 Received 18 th October 2016 Accepted 18 th November 2016 Short Research Article th Published 24 November 2016 ABSTRACT Lernaeid copepods are one of the most detrimental and ubiquitous ectoparasites of cultured and wild variety freshwater fishes. River Godavari offers a dynamic habitat to a wide variety of fishes which are in turn infected by endo and ectoparasites.
    [Show full text]
  • And Argulus Sp
    生物圏科学 Biosphere Sci. 54：71－74 (2015) Lernaea cyprinacea (Copepoda: Lernaeidae) and Argulus sp. (Branchiura: Argulidae) parasitic on the freshwater goby Rhinogobius sp. TO endemic to Japan 1) 2) Kazuya NAGASAWA * and Ryo-ichi TORII 1) Graduate School of Biosphere Science, Hiroshima University, 1-4-4 Kagamiyama, Higashi-Hiroshima, Hiroshima 739-8528, Japan 2) Mikawa Freshwater Life Network, B101 Plaza Verde, 1-3-1 Fudaki, Hekinan, Aichi, 447-0088, Japan Abstract The freshwater goby, Rhinogobius sp. TO, is endemic to Japan and occurs only in the Tokai District, central Honshu, Japan. The lernaeid copepod, Lernaea cyprinacea Linnaeus, 1758, and the argulid branchiuran, Argulus sp., were collected from specimens of this goby in Aichi Prefecture. These crustaceans are the first parasites found from Rhinogobius sp. TO. Key words: Argulus sp., Branchiura, Copepoda, fish parasite, Lernaea cyprinacea, Rhinogobius sp. TO INTRODUCTION The genus Rhinogobius (Perciformes: Gobioidei) is a specious gobiid group and currently consists of 17 valid species in Japan (Akihito et al., 2013). Some species of this genus, however, have not yet been identified at specific level, and tentative scientific names have been used for them. Rhinogobius sp. TO is an example of such use, and “TO” is used because the distribution of the species is restricted to the Tokai District, central Honshu (Suzuki and Sakamoto, 2005), where it occurs in four prefectures (Gifu, Mie, Aichi, and Shizuoka) (Suzuki and Mukai, 2010; Akihito et al., 2013). To date, no parasite has been reported from this goby. Recently, two species of crustacean parasites, Lernaea cyprinacea Linnaeus, 1758 (Copepoda: Lernaeidae) and Argulus sp.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishery Bulletin of the Fish and Wildlife Service V.62
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, Stewart L. Udall, Secretary FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, Clarence F. Pautzke, Commissioner BUREAU OF COMMERCIAL FISHERIES, Donald L. McKernan, Director BIBLIOGRAPHY ,ON THE BIOLOGY 'OF THE COD Gadus morhua AND RELATED SPECIES By JOHN P. WISE FISHERY BULLETIN 215 From Fishery Bulletin ~f the Fish and Wildlife Service VOLUME 62 Published by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service _ Washinl1ton Printed at the U.S. Government PrlntlnQ Office _ WashinQton,1963 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government PrlntlnQ Office, WashlnQton 25, D.C. - Price 40 cents Created in 1849, the Department of the Interior-America's Department of Nattu'nl Resources-is eoncerned with the management, eonservation, and development of the Nation's water, fish, wildlife, mineral, forest, and park and reereational resotu'ces. It also has rililjor responsibilities for Indian and Territorial affairs. As the Nation's principal conservation ageney, the Department works to assure that nonrenewable resow'ces fire developed and used wisely, that park and reCl'eational resources n.re conserved for the future, and that renewable resources mn.ke their full contribution to the progress, prosperity, and security of the United States-now and in the future, II CONTENTS Page Introduction_______________________________________________________________ 483 Bibliography_______________________________________________________________ 484 Index by subjects ~________________________________ 535 Index by geographical areas__ ____ _______ ____ _____________ ____________________ 537 AddClldum __ - ._______ ____ ___ ___ _ 538 III ABSTRACT A bibliography of 1,020 references on the biology of the cod, Gadu8 morhua L., and related species of North American members of the genus Gadu8 whichis reasonably complete through 1959.
    [Show full text]
  • Juvenile Lost River and Shortnose Sucker Year Class Strength
    Juvenile Lost River and Shortnose Sucker Year Class Strength, Survival, and Growth in Upper Klamath Lake, Oregon, and Clear Lake Reservoir, California: 2016 Monitoring Report Open-File Report 2018–1066 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover: Photograph showing Upper Klamath Lake, Oregon in July with a cyanobacterial bloom. Photograph taken from Modoc Rim on the eastern shore looking to the northwest. Photograph from U.S. Geological Survey. Juvenile Lost River and Shortnose Sucker Year Class Strength, Survival, and Growth in Upper Klamath Lake, Oregon, and Clear Lake Reservoir, California—2016 Monitoring Report By Summer M. Burdick, Carl O. Ostberg, and Marshal S. Hoy Open-File Report 2018–1066 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior RYAN K. ZINKE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey William H. Werkheiser, Deputy Director exercising the authority of the Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2018 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit https://www.usgs.gov/ or call 1–888–ASK–USGS (1–888–275–8747). For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit https://store.usgs.gov. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text. Permission to reproduce copyrighted items must be secured from the copyright owner.
    [Show full text]
  • New Host Records for Lernaea Cyprinacea (Copepoda), a Parasite of Freshwater Fishes, with a Checklist of the Lernaeidae in Japan (1915-2007)
    J. Grad. Sch. Biosp. Sci. Hiroshima Univ. (2007), 46：21～33 New Host Records for Lernaea cyprinacea (Copepoda), a Parasite of Freshwater Fishes, with a Checklist of the Lernaeidae in Japan (1915-2007) Kazuya Nagasawa, Akiko Inoue, Su Myat and Tetsuya Umino Graduate School of Biosphere Science, Hiroshima University 1-4-4 Kagamiyama, Higashi-Hiroshima, Hiroshima 739-8528, Japan Abstract The lernaeid copepod Lernaea cyprinacea Linnaeus, 1758, was found attached to three species of freshwater fishes, the barbell steed Hemibarbus labeo (Pallas) (Cyprinidae), the dark chub Zacco temminckii (Temminck and Schlegel) (Cyprinidae), and the Amur catfish Silurus asotus Linnaeus (Siluridae) from Hiroshima Prefecture in Japan. The findings from Hemibarbus labeo and Zacco temminckii represent new host records for L. cyprinacea, while Silurus asotus is a new host in Japan. Based on the literature published for 93 years from 1915 to 2007, a checklist of three species of lernaeid copepods (Lernaea cyprinacea, Lernaea parasiluri, Lamproglena chinensis) from Japan is given, including information on the synonym(s), host(s), site(s) of infection, and distribution. The checklist shows that in Japan L. cyprinacea has been reported from 33 or 34 species and subspecies of fishes belonging to 17 families in 10 orders and also from 2 species of amphibians from 2 families in 2 orders. Key words: Lamproglena chinensis; Lernaea cyprinacea; Lernaea parasiluri; Lernaeidae; parasites; new hosts INTRODUCTION The lernaeid copepod Lernaea cyprinacea Linnaeus, 1758, often called the anchor worm, is a parasite of freshwater fishes in various regions of the world (Kabata, 1979; Lester and Hayward, 2006). The anterior part of the body of metamorphosed adult female is embedded in the host tissue, whereas the remaining body protrudes in the water.
    [Show full text]
  • Acipenser Stellatus As a New Host Record for Lernaea Cyprinacea Linnaeus, 1758 (Crustacea; Copepoda), a Parasites of Freshwater Fishes in Iran
    Journal of Aquaculture & Marine Biology Research Article Open Access Acipenser stellatus as a new host record for Lernaea cyprinacea linnaeus, 1758 (crustacea; copepoda), a parasites of freshwater fishes in Iran Abstract Volume 7 Issue 3 - 2018 Acipenser stellatus is the most euryhaline sturgeon in the Caspian Sea which is reputed Abbas Bozorgnia,1 Neda Sharifi,2 Mohammad to have the tastiest flesh and also the best caviar in Iran. The main objective of the current 3 4 study was to investigate the gill parasites of A. stellatus in “Rajaee Aquaculture Centre” Reza Youssefi, Maryam Barzegar 1Assistant Professor, Faculty of Natural Resources Sciences, in northeast of Caspian Sea Basin, Mazandaran Province. A total of 22 individuals were QaemShahrBranch, Islamic Azad University, Iran selected accidentally and examined for the parasites during the spring of 2017. Six adult 2Department of Veterinary Parasitology, Islamic Azad University, female of Lernaea cyprinacea L. 1758, an ectoparasitic copepod species was detected on Iran the gill filaments and archs. Five (22.7%) out of 22 specimens of the examined fish were 3Department of Aquatic Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary infected with adult anchor worms containing egg sacs and A.stellatus is presented as a Medicine, Iran new host for L.cyprinacea in the present report. The presence of this parasite on sturgeon fishes has not previously been reported in all over the world. Also this is the first report of Correspondence: Abbas Bozorgnia, Assistant Professor, occurrence of adult female of L.cyprinacea on the fish gills. Faculty of Natural Resources Sciences, Qaem Shahr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Iran, Email [email protected] Keywords: Acipenser stellatus, adult Lernaea cyprinacea, gills, caspian sea Received: May 18, 2018 | Published: May 24, 2018 Introduction latipinna from local ornamental fish farm in the north of Iran.
    [Show full text]
  • Juvenile Sucker Cohort Tracking Data Summary and Assessment of Monitoring Program, 2015
    Juvenile Sucker Cohort Tracking Data Summary and Assessment of Monitoring Program, 2015 Open-File Report 2016–1164 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover: 1IPUPHSBQITIPXJOHSFTFBSDIFSTMPPLJOHGPSTVDLFSTJOUSBQOFUDBUDIFTGSPN6QQFS,MBNBUI-BLF 0SFHPO 1IPUPHSBQICZ5PEE1FSSZ 64(FPMPHJDBM4VSWFZ "VHVTU Juvenile Sucker Cohort Tracking Data Summary and Assessment of Monitoring Program, 2015 By Summer M. Burdick, Carl O. Ostberg, Mark E. Hereford, and Marshal S. Hoy Open-File Report 2016–1164 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior SALLY JEWELL, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Suzette M. Kimball, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2016 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit http://www.usgs.gov/ or call 1–888–ASK–USGS (1–888–275–8747). For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://store.usgs.gov. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text. Permission to reproduce copyrighted items must be secured from the copyright owner. Suggested citation: Burdick, S.M., Ostberg, C.O., Hereford, M.E., and Hoy, M.S., 2016, Juvenile sucker cohort tracking data summary and assessment of monitoring program, 2015: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2016–1164, 30 p., http://dx.doi.org/10.3133/ofr20161164.
    [Show full text]
  • Background and Implementation Information for the National Recovery Plan for the Murray Cod (Maccullochella Peelii Peelii)
    Background and Implementation Information for the National Recovery Plan for the Murray Cod Maccullochella peelii peelii National Murray Cod Recovery Team Written and compiled by John Koehn and Pam Clunie, Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research, Department of Sustainability and Environment, Victoria. Published by the Victorian Government Department of Sustainability and Environment (DSE) Melbourne, October 2010 © State of Victoria Department of Sustainability and Environment 2010 This publication is copyright. No part may be reproduced by any process except in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. Authorised by the Victorian Government, 8 Nicholson Street, East Melbourne. ISBN 978-1-74208-677-4 This is a Background and Implementation Information document associated with a Recovery Plan prepared under the Commonwealth Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999, with the assistance of funding provided by the Australian Government. This Recovery Plan has been developed with the involvement and cooperation of a range of stakeholders, but individual stakeholders have not necessarily committed to undertaking specific actions. The attainment of objectives and the provision of funds may be subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved. Proposed actions may be subject to modification over the life of the plan due to changes in knowledge. Disclaimer This publication may be of assistance to you but the State of Victoria and its employees do not guarantee that the publication is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your particular purposes and therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or other consequence that may arise from you relying on any information in this publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Lagoon Resident Fish Species of Conservation Interest According to the Habitat Directive (92/43/CEE): a Review on Their Potential Use As Ecological Indicator Species
    water Review Lagoon Resident Fish Species of Conservation Interest According to the Habitat Directive (92/43/CEE): A Review on Their Potential Use as Ecological Indicator Species Chiara Facca * , Francesco Cavraro, Piero Franzoi and Stefano Malavasi Department of Environmental Sciences, Informatics and Statistics, Ca’ Foscari University of Venice, via Torino 155, 30175 Venice, Italy; [email protected] (F.C.); [email protected] (P.F.); [email protected] (S.M.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +39-(0)-41-234-7733 Received: 22 May 2020; Accepted: 17 July 2020; Published: 20 July 2020 Abstract: Transitional waters are fragile ecosystems with high ecological, social and economic values, that undergo numerous threats. According to the information provided by European Member States in the framework of the European Directive 92/43/EEC (Habitat Directive), the main threat to these ecosystems is represented by morphological and hydrological changes. The present work focuses on six lagoon fish species included in the Habitat Directive annex II (species requiring conservation measures: Aphanius fasciatus, A. iberus, Knipowitschia panizzae, Ninnigobius canestrinii, Valencia hispanica and V. letourneuxi) that spend their entire life cycle in the Mediterranean priority habitat 1150* “Coastal lagoons”. The overview of the current scientific literature allowed us to highlight how the presence and abundance of these species may provide important indications on the conservation status of coastal lagoon habitats. In fact, their occurrence, distribution and biology depend on the presence of peculiar structures, such as salt marshes, small channels, isolated pools and oligohaline areas. Coastal lagoon fragmentation and habitat loss have led to a significant reduction in genetic diversity or local population extinction.
    [Show full text]