DOCSLIB.ORG

Alien Pathogens and Parasites Impacting Native Freshwater Fish Of

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Alien Pathogens and Parasites Impacting Native Freshwater Fish Of Alien pathogens and parasites impacting native freshwater fish of southern Australia: a scientific and historical review Simon Kaminskas Murray–Darling Basin Authority, Canberra, Australia [email protected] Downloaded from http://meridian.allenpress.com/australian-zoologist/article-pdf/doi/10.7882/AZ.2020.039/2675961/10.7882_az.2020.039.pdf by guest on 26 September 2021 Native freshwater fish of Australia have a diverse but largely undescribed endemic pathogen and parasite fauna. However, due to long-shared evolutionary histories and virulence/transmissibility trade-offs, effects of these endemic pathogens and parasites appear to be subtle: significant impacts are rarely observed and epizootics have not been recorded. In contrast, a number of alien pathogens and parasites are now established across southern Australia, causing manifestly harmful effects to native fish species and known or suspected epizootics in native fish populations. Undetected and/or undescribed alien viral pathogens are also suspected of being present. Alien pathogens and parasites were introduced to Australia with imports of live alien fish or their fertilised eggs. A review of the scientific and historical evidence indicates that they have had, and continue to have, greater impacts on native fish species than previously realised—especially for freshwater species. This review also documents a previously unknown, Murray-Darling-Basin-wide epizootic of Murray cod Maccullochella peelii in 1929–30, which may have contributed to strong declines in the related eastern freshwater cod Maccullochella ikei. A serious Chilodonella epizootic of M. peelii in 1982 is also examined. In addition, a possible role for alien viruses of the family Iridoviridae (Ranavirus and Megalocytivirus) in the general decline of the critically endangered silver perch Bidyanus bidyanus, and the rapid collapse of two specific native fish populations—upper Murrumbidgee River B. bidyanus and Shoalhaven River Macquarie perch Macquaria australasica—is suggested. It is argued that the severity of the impact of the virulent alien oomycete Saprolegnia parasitica, both historical and present day, has been underestimated. Finally, action is recommended against emerging new pathogen and parasite threats, and the extreme risk current alien fish importations pose in introducing them. These will further threaten already stressed native fish populations in southern Australia, particularly across the Murray-Darling Basin. ABSTRACT Key words: alien fish, importation, stocking, alien parasites, alien pathogens, epizootics, Saprolegnia, Lernaea, Chilodonella, Iridoviridae, Ranavirus, Megalocytivirus, Sphaerothecum, Maccullochella, Gadopsis, Galaxias, Prototroctes, Macquaria, Bidyanus, Murray-Darling Basin DOI: https://doi.org/10.7882/AZ.2020.039 Introduction The spread and emergence of new, alien pathogens and salmon fluke Gyrodactylus salaris on naïve Norwegian parasites is receiving increasing attention as a threat Atlantic salmon Salmo salar stocks (Johnsen and to the world’s endemic freshwater faunas. Reports of Jensen 1988, 1991), and the multiple extinctions and emerging diseases in amphibians, fishes, crayfishes and declines in frog species around the world from chytrid even Copepoda have significantly increased in the fungus Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (e.g. Skerrat et al. scientific literature in recent decades (Johnson and Paull 2007; Cheng et al. 2011). More recently, the formerly 2011; Roennfeldt 2013). New fungal and fungal-like widespread European sunbleak Leucaspius delineatus has pathogens are emerging in fish and are on the increase severely declined due to total spawning inhibition and globally (Gozlan et al. 2014). Importantly, various studies increased mortality caused by an alien fungal pathogen have shown the ornamental fish trade (Whittington and (rosette agent Sphaerothecum destruens) vectored by an Chong 2007; Peeler et al. 2011) and aquaculture (Johnson asymptomatic invasive alien fish (topmouth gudgeon and Paull 2011; Okamura and Feist 2011; Peeler et al. Pseudorasbora parva) (Gozlan et al. 2005). Sphaerothecum 2011) are the major vectors spreading these pathogens destruens is now having further devastating impacts on and parasites around the world. naïve endemic freshwater fish species across Eurasia as well as on sea bass Dicentrarchus labrax farming operations Notable impacts of alien pathogens and parasites in the Mediterranean Sea (Ercan et al. 2015). internationally include the near-extirpation of the European noble crayfish Astacus astacus by the alien These impacts are largely predicted by the scientific oomycete crayfish plague Aphanomyces astaci (Alderman literature. Endemic pathogens and parasites are an 1996), the catastrophic impact of the translocated Baltic expected component of any ecosystem, with extensive Australian 2020 Zoologist A Kaminskas linkages in foodwebs and roles in competitive and trophic peelii in 1929–30, which may also have contributed to interactions and species fitness (Marcogliese 2004; strong declines in the related eastern freshwater cod Hudson et al. 2006; Lymbery et al. 2010; Johnson and Maccullochella ikei, Paull 2011; Okamura and Feist 2011). Endemic pathogens and parasites generally lead to subtle sub-clinical chronic • highlight the future threat posed by alien pathogens and (i.e. long-term) infections that are tolerated by their parasites, which are currently entering Australia in large endemic fish hosts. This is a reflection of natural processes quantities with imported ornamental fish, and and a long evolutionary history between hosts and parasites (Okamura and Feist 2011). However, when alien • explore the role of historical evidence in understanding pathogens and parasites are introduced to new areas and and providing context to past declines of threatened Downloaded from http://meridian.allenpress.com/australian-zoologist/article-pdf/doi/10.7882/AZ.2020.039/2675961/10.7882_az.2020.039.pdf by guest on 26 September 2021 switch hosts to new, naïve species and populations (host- native freshwater fish and their current conservation switching), their effects are often severe to catastrophic. situation. Such impacts can generally be attributed to a lack of innate immunity in the new host compared with the original host (Peeler et al. 2011). Significantly, such severe Analysis effects are also exacerbated by the generalist ecological Of the alien pathogens and parasites presented in nature of most parasites and pathogens that succeed in Table 1, those of greatest concern and therefore establishing in new habitats (Dove 2000; Gozlan et al. considered for further analysis are: 2014). The ability of generalist pathogens and parasites to infect multiple hosts means there is no selective • viruses of the Iridoviridae family advantage to them in moderating their virulence and this feature often drives high virulence in susceptible and/or • the oomycetes Saprolegnia parasitica and Aphanomyces naïve hosts (Langdon 1990; Peeler et al. 2011; Gozlan et invadans al. 2014). • the ecto-parasitic protozoans Chilodonella hexasticha and The historical record and scientific literature clearly Ichthyophthirius multifiliis, and demonstrate that Australian freshwater systems and their naïve endemic fish faunas have been similarly impacted by • the non-protozoan parasites Lernaea cyprinacea and alien pathogens and parasites. Schyzocotyle acheilognathi. A summary of alien pathogens and parasites that are of EHNV and other members of the concern to native freshwater fish and have established Iridoviridae Family in southern Australia is provided at Table 1. These can be divided into five main groups: viruses, bacteria, Epizootic Haematopoietic Necrosis Virus (EHNV) is oomycetes, protozoans, and parasites (internal and a member of the Ranavirus genus and the Iridoviridae external). Known alien viruses affecting southern family, a family of viruses that infect invertebrates and Australian native fish in the wild currently only comprise non-homeothermic vertebrates. A number of ranaviruses the ranavirus Epizootic Haematopoietic Necrosis Virus affecting fish suddenly emerged between the mid-1980s (EHNV), vectored by alien redfin perch Perca fluviatilis and mid-1990s, proving to be severe pathogens of fish and possibly alien rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss1 and capable of causing severe epizootics with high (see Table 1). However, other viruses listed in Table 1 are mortality rates (Whittington et al. 2010). EHNV was suspected of being present, and both ISKNV and VER isolated in 1985, and was the first ranavirus recorded have already entered Australian aquaculture facilities, to cause epizootic mortalities in fish, with Santee- causing severe mortalities (Clunie and Koehn 2001; Cooper Virus (SCV) and European Catfish Virus (ECV) Go and Whittington 2006). Other significant disease- following shortly after (Langdon et al. 1986; Whittington causing agents are the alien ecto-parasitic protozoans et al. 2010). EHNV and ECV are very closely related to and the virulent alien oomycetes (Table 1). each other, and closely related to the type species for the Ranavirus genus, Frog Virus 3 (FV–3), which was In undertaking this analytical review, this paper specifically isolated from the leopard frog Rana pipiens in North seeks to: America in the 1960s (Whittington et al. 2010). This indicates that EHNV probably had its origin in an • explore the role of alien pathogens and parasites in amphibian host (although iridoviruses are adept at host- historical declines
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Global Assessment of Parasite Diversity in Galaxiid Fishes
    diversity Article A Global Assessment of Parasite Diversity in Galaxiid Fishes Rachel A. Paterson 1,*, Gustavo P. Viozzi 2, Carlos A. Rauque 2, Verónica R. Flores 2 and Robert Poulin 3 1 The Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, P.O. Box 5685, Torgarden, 7485 Trondheim, Norway 2 Laboratorio de Parasitología, INIBIOMA, CONICET—Universidad Nacional del Comahue, Quintral 1250, San Carlos de Bariloche 8400, Argentina; [email protected] (G.P.V.); [email protected] (C.A.R.); veronicaroxanafl[email protected] (V.R.F.) 3 Department of Zoology, University of Otago, P.O. Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +47-481-37-867 Abstract: Free-living species often receive greater conservation attention than the parasites they support, with parasite conservation often being hindered by a lack of parasite biodiversity knowl- edge. This study aimed to determine the current state of knowledge regarding parasites of the Southern Hemisphere freshwater fish family Galaxiidae, in order to identify knowledge gaps to focus future research attention. Specifically, we assessed how galaxiid–parasite knowledge differs among geographic regions in relation to research effort (i.e., number of studies or fish individuals examined, extent of tissue examination, taxonomic resolution), in addition to ecological traits known to influ- ence parasite richness. To date, ~50% of galaxiid species have been examined for parasites, though the majority of studies have focused on single parasite taxa rather than assessing the full diversity of macro- and microparasites. The highest number of parasites were observed from Argentinean galaxiids, and studies in all geographic regions were biased towards the highly abundant and most widely distributed galaxiid species, Galaxias maculatus.
    [Show full text]
  • Fisheries Guidelines for Design of Stream Crossings
    Fish Habitat Guideline FHG 001 FISH PASSAGE IN STREAMS Fisheries guidelines for design of stream crossings Elizabeth Cotterell August 1998 Fisheries Group DPI ISSN 1441-1652 Agdex 486/042 FHG 001 First published August 1998 Information contained in this publication is provided as general advice only. For application to specific circumstances, professional advice should be sought. The Queensland Department of Primary Industries has taken all reasonable steps to ensure the information contained in this publication is accurate at the time of publication. Readers should ensure that they make appropriate enquiries to determine whether new information is available on the particular subject matter. © The State of Queensland, Department of Primary Industries 1998 Copyright protects this publication. Except for purposes permitted by the Copyright Act, reproduction by whatever means is prohibited without the prior written permission of the Department of Primary Industries, Queensland. Enquiries should be addressed to: Manager Publishing Services Queensland Department of Primary Industries GPO Box 46 Brisbane QLD 4001 Fisheries Guidelines for Design of Stream Crossings BACKGROUND Introduction Fish move widely in rivers and creeks throughout Queensland and Australia. Fish movement is usually associated with reproduction, feeding, escaping predators or dispersing to new habitats. This occurs between marine and freshwater habitats, and wholly within freshwater. Obstacles to this movement, such as stream crossings, can severely deplete fish populations, including recreational and commercial species such as barramundi, mullet, Mary River cod, silver perch, golden perch, sooty grunter and Australian bass. Many Queensland streams are ephemeral (they may flow only during the wet season), and therefore crossings must be designed for both flood and drought conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • REVOLUTIONISING Inland Fish Production and Stocking in Victoria “WE GROW YOUR FISH”
    REVOLUTIONISING Inland Fish Production and Stocking in Victoria “WE GROW YOUR FISH” Prepared by the Snobs Creek Advisory Board Introduction The Victorian Fisheries Authority (VFA) has a long and successful history of growing and stocking fish to recover threatened species, build fish populations and create fantastic recreational fishing opportunities in Victoria. Most of our waterways are heavily modified and no longer consistently provide conditions that support natural breeding for fish. Therefore, fish stocking is an essential and powerful tool for maintaining fish populations and good fishing, alongside river restoration activities including habitat rehabilitation and environmental flows. In Victoria over 200 waters are stocked annually with twelve different fish species. These include both native threatened fish such as Murray cod, golden perch, trout cod, Macquarie perch, silver perch, catfish, Australian bass, and estuary perch, and popular introduced recreational fish species such as brown trout, rainbow trout, chinook salmon, brook trout. Current fish stocking in Victoria ¡[ Mixed Mildura ¡[ ¡[ ¡[ Mixed Mildura¡[ Family Fishing Waters ¡[ ¡[ ¡[ Family Fishing Waters ¡[ Estuarine ¡[ Estuarine ¡[ ¡[ Native ¡[ Mixed ¡[ Native MilduraSwan Hill ¡[ Salmonid ¡[ ¡[ ¡[ ¡[Swan HillFamily Fishing Waters ¡[ Salmonid ¡[¡[ ¡[ ¡[Kerang ¡[ ¡[¡[¡[ Estuarine ¡[ ¡[ ¡[¡[ ¡[ ¡[Kerang ¡[ ¡[ [ ¡[ ¡[ ¡[ ¡[ ¡[¡ [¡[Wodonga¡[ ¡[¡[ Native¡[ ¡[ ¡[ ¡[ ¡[¡[ ¡[ ¡[¡[ ¡[ ¡[ ¡[ ¡[ ¡[ ¡[ ¡[ ¡[ ¡[¡[ Wodonga ¡[ ¡[ ¡[ ¡[ ¡[ ¡[[Shepparton ¡[ ¡[ ¡[¡[ ¡[ ¡[ ¡[ ¡[ ¡[ ¡[¡[
    [Show full text]
  • Condition Monitoring of Threatened Fish Populations in Lake Alexandrina and Lake Albert
    Condition Monitoring of Threatened Fish Populations in Lake Alexandrina and Lake Albert Report to the Murray–Darling Basin Authority and the South Australian Department for Environment and Water Scotte Wedderburn and Thomas Barnes June 2018 © The University of Adelaide and the Department for Environment and Water With the exception of the Commonwealth Coat of Arms, the Murray–Darling Basin Authority logo, photographs and presented data, all material presented in this document is provided under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence (https://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/). For the avoidance of any doubt, this licence only applies to the material set out in this document. The details of the licence are available on the Creative Commons website (accessible using the links provided) as is the full legal code for the CC BY 4.0 licence (https://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode). MDBA’s preference is that this publication be attributed (and any material sourced from it) using the following: Publication title: Condition Monitoring of Threatened Fish Populations in Lake Alexandrina and Lake Albert Source: Licensed from the Department for Environment and Water under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence The contents of this publication do not purport to represent the position of the Commonwealth of Australia or the MDBA in any way and are presented for the purpose of informing and stimulating discussion for improved management of Basin's natural resources. To the extent permitted by law, the copyright holders (including its employees and consultants) exclude all liability to any person for any consequences, including but not limited to all losses, damages, costs, expenses and any other compensation, arising directly or indirectly from using this report (in part or in whole) and any information or material contained in it.
    [Show full text]
  • 2219573-REP-Marine Assessment Report AR
    Appendix L – Marine Assessment GHD | Report for Hunter Water Corporation - Belmont Drought Response Desalination Plant, 2219573 Hunter Water Corporation Belmont Drought Response Desalination Plant Marine Environment Assessment Amendment Report July 2020 Table of contents 1. Introduction..................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background .......................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose and structure of this report .................................................................................... 2 2. Project changes ............................................................................................................................. 4 2.1 Overview .............................................................................................................................. 4 2.2 Key features of the amended Project .................................................................................. 4 3. Methodology ................................................................................................................................... 7 3.1 Review of relevant legislation .............................................................................................. 7 3.2 Review of databases and searches ..................................................................................... 7 3.3 Review of previous marine ecology reports ........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • SALINITY SENSITIVITY in EARLY LIFE STAGES of an AUSTRALIAN FRESHWATER FISH, MURRAY COD (Maccullochella Peelii Peelii Mitchell 1838)
    i SALINITY SENSITIVITY IN EARLY LIFE STAGES OF AN AUSTRALIAN FRESHWATER FISH, MURRAY COD (Maccullochella peelii peelii Mitchell 1838) Piyapong Chotipuntu THESIS SUBMITTED FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CANBERRA Submitted August 2003 ii © Piyapong Chotipuntu 2003 Abstract The Murray cod (Maccullochella peelii peelii Mitchell 1838) is Australia’s largest freshwater fish. Once highly abundant in the Murray-Darling river system, populations have drastically declined in recent decades. Many causes for this decline have been proposed, including over-fishing, habitat loss and altered river flow regimes. This study hypothesised that elevated salinities have led to selective mortality in some developmental stages, which have in turn depleted stock recruitment and adult populations. The objectives of this study were to determine the optimal, threshold, upper sublethal and lethal salinities for development of eggs, yolk-sac larvae, fry and fingerlings of M. peelii peelii. Investigation the impact of salinity on fertilisation utilised gametes of trout cod (M. macquariensis, Cuvier 1829) instead of M. peelii peelii. Studies were carried out in a controlled laboratory environment using test media prepared from commercial sea salt. The results showed that the eggs of the trout cod hatched only when fertilised and incubated in freshwater, and only larvae hatched in freshwater survived through the yolk absorption period of 12 days. Yolk utilisation efficiencies were not significantly different among the salinities of 0-0.30 g/L. There was no effect of pre- or post- fertilising processes on the salinity tolerances of yolk-sac larvae. No larvae survived at salinities higher than 0.30 g/L during the yolk utilisation period.
    [Show full text]
  • Petition to List US Populations of Lake Sturgeon (Acipenser Fulvescens)
    Petition to List U.S. Populations of Lake Sturgeon (Acipenser fulvescens) as Endangered or Threatened under the Endangered Species Act May 14, 2018 NOTICE OF PETITION Submitted to U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service on May 14, 2018: Gary Frazer, USFWS Assistant Director, [email protected] Charles Traxler, Assistant Regional Director, Region 3, [email protected] Georgia Parham, Endangered Species, Region 3, [email protected] Mike Oetker, Deputy Regional Director, Region 4, [email protected] Allan Brown, Assistant Regional Director, Region 4, [email protected] Wendi Weber, Regional Director, Region 5, [email protected] Deborah Rocque, Deputy Regional Director, Region 5, [email protected] Noreen Walsh, Regional Director, Region 6, [email protected] Matt Hogan, Deputy Regional Director, Region 6, [email protected] Petitioner Center for Biological Diversity formally requests that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (“USFWS”) list the lake sturgeon (Acipenser fulvescens) in the United States as a threatened species under the federal Endangered Species Act (“ESA”), 16 U.S.C. §§1531-1544. Alternatively, the Center requests that the USFWS define and list distinct population segments of lake sturgeon in the U.S. as threatened or endangered. Lake sturgeon populations in Minnesota, Lake Superior, Missouri River, Ohio River, Arkansas-White River and lower Mississippi River may warrant endangered status. Lake sturgeon populations in Lake Michigan and the upper Mississippi River basin may warrant threatened status. Lake sturgeon in the central and eastern Great Lakes (Lake Huron, Lake Erie, Lake Ontario and the St. Lawrence River basin) seem to be part of a larger population that is more widespread.
    [Show full text]
  • Aquatic Ecology of the Montagu River Catchment
    Aquatic Ecology of the Montagu River Catchment A Report Forming Part of the Requirements for State of Rivers Reporting David Horner Water Assessment and Planning Branch Water Resources Division DPIWE. December, 2003 State of Rivers Aquatic Ecology of the Montagu Catchment Copyright Notice: Material contained in the report provided is subject to Australian copyright law. Other than in accordance with the Copyright Act 1968 of the Commonwealth Parliament, no part of this report may, in any form or by any means, be reproduced, transmitted or used. This report cannot be redistributed for any commercial purpose whatsoever, or distributed to a third party for such purpose, without prior written permission being sought from the Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment, on behalf of the Crown in Right of the State of Tasmania. Disclaimer: Whilst DPIWE has made every attempt to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the information and data provided, it is the responsibility of the data user to make their own decisions about the accuracy, currency, reliability and correctness of information provided. The Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment, its employees and agents, and the Crown in the Right of the State of Tasmania do not accept any liability for any damage caused by, or economic loss arising from, reliance on this information. Preferred Citation: DPIWE (2003). State of the River Report for the Montagu River Catchment. Water Assessment and Planning Branch, Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment, Hobart. Technical Report No. WAP 03/09 ISSN: 1449-5996 The Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment The Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment provides leadership in the sustainable management and development of Tasmania’s resources.
    [Show full text]
  • AFSS 2014 Abstract Booklet
    Oral abstracts Oral abstracts The evolution of ASFB – reflections on 35 years of membership Seeing with sound – the behaviour and movements of fish in estuaries 1 2 1 2 01 Martin Gomon1 04 Alistair Becker , Iain M Suthers , Alan K Whitfield 1. Museum Victoria, Melbourne, VIC, Australia 1. University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia 2. South African Institute for Aquatic Biodiversity, Grahamstown, South Africa The Australian Society for Fish Biology had as its inception early meetings organised by the ichthyological staff of the Australian Museum and New South Fisheries intended as a mechanism for sharing advances in fish related science and the development of Underwater video techniques have progressed rapidly over the past ten years, and are now used in a diverse range of habitats initiatives leading to the better understanding of the diversity and biology of Australia’s ichthyofauna. Although the enthusiasm from small creeks to the ocean depths. A limitation of underwater video cameras is they rely on high levels of water clarity and and casual nature of this now incorporated body has remained, the various focuses of the Society and its annual conferences have require artificial lighting if used in low light conditions. In systems such as estuaries, turbidity levels often restrict the use of changed over the decades in line with the evolving directions of the institutions and authorities charged with addressing fish conventional video. Acoustic cameras (DIDSON) overcome this problem as they rely on sound to produce near video, flowing studies and management, as well as the transient influences of the many characters that have been the Society’s driving force.
    [Show full text]
  • ACT, Australian Capital Territory
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Fish Strategy
    MURRAY-DARLING BASIN AUTHORITY Native Fish Strategy Mesoscale movements of small- and medium-sized fish in the Murray-Darling Basin MURRAY-DARLING BASIN AUTHORITY Native Fish Strategy Mesoscale movements of small- and medium-sized fish in the Murray-Darling Basin M. Hutchison, A. Butcher, J. Kirkwood, D. Mayer, K. Chilcott and S. Backhouse Queensland Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries Published by Murray-Darling Basin Commission Postal Address GPO Box 409, Canberra ACT 2601 Office location Level 4, 51 Allara Street, Canberra City Australian Capital Territory Telephone (02) 6279 0100 international + 61 2 6279 0100 Facsimile (02) 6248 8053 international + 61 2 6248 8053 Email [email protected] Internet http://www.mdbc.gov.au For further information contact the Murray-Darling Basin Commission office on (02) 6279 0100 This report may be cited as: Hutchison, M, Butcher, A, Kirkwood, J, Mayer, D, Chikott, K and Backhouse, S. Mesoscale movements of small and medium-sized fish in the Murray-Darling Basin MDBC Publication No. 41/08 ISBN 978 1 921257 81 0 © Copyright Murray-Darling Basin Commission 2008 This work is copyright. Graphical and textual information in the work (with the exception of photographs and the MDBC logo) may be stored, retrieved and reproduced in whole or in part, provided the information is not sold or used for commercial benefit and is acknowledged. Such reproduction includes fair dealing for the purpose of private study, research, criticism or review as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968. Reproduction for other purposes is prohibited without prior permission of the Murray-Darling Basin Commission or the individual photographers and artists with whom copyright applies.
    [Show full text]
  • Targeted Review of Biological and Ecological Information from Fisheries Research in the South East Marine Region
    TARGETED REVIEW OF BIOLOGICAL AND ECOLOGICAL INFORMATION FROM FISHERIES RESEARCH IN THE SOUTH EAST MARINE REGION FINAL REPORT B. D. Bruce, R. Bradford, R. Daley, M. Green and K. Phillips December 2002 Client: National Oceans Office Targeted review of biological and ecological information from fisheries research in the South East Marine Region Final Report B. D. Bruce, R. Bradford, R. Daley M. Green and K. Phillips* CSIRO Marine Research, Hobart * National Oceans Office December 2002 2 Table of Contents: Table of Contents:...................................................................................................................................3 Introduction.............................................................................................................................................5 Objective of review.............................................................................................................................5 Structure of review..............................................................................................................................5 Format.................................................................................................................................................6 General ecological/biological issues and uncertainties for the South East Marine Region ....................9 Specific fishery and key species accounts ............................................................................................10 South East Fishery (SEF) including the South East Trawl
    [Show full text]