Electrifying Hong Kong: Making Transport Sustainable

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Electrifying Hong Kong: Making Transport Sustainable ELECTRIFYING HONG KONG: MAKING TRANSPORT SUSTAINABLE Richard Gilbert† Prepared for Civic Exchange, Hong Kong February 2002 † Information about the author appears on Page 117 ELECTRIFYING HONG KONG: MAKING TRANSPORT SUSTAINABLE PAGE 3 Table of Contents SUMMARY ................................................................5 3.2.2. Road vehicle fleet.....................................38 3.2.3. Trends in road traffic ................................39 1. INTRODUCTION .....................................................7 3.2.4. Trends in air and marine freight activity ...40 1.1. Sustainability: securing the well-being of 3.3. Transport projections...................................... 42 seven generations of new faces .......................7 3.3.1. Public transport infrastructure ..................42 3.3.2. Road vehicle fleet.....................................42 1.2. Sustainability and sustainable transport .........11 3.3.3. Transport activity......................................43 1.3. Definitions and vision of sustainable 3.4. Concluding remarks........................................ 44 transport..........................................................12 1.4. Environmental imperatives set the 4. EFFECTS OF TRANSPORT IN HONG KONG.............. 46 framework for sustainability ............................15 4.1. Energy use ..................................................... 46 2. HONG KONG IN WORLD AND ASIAN CONTEXTS .......19 4.2. Emissions of greenhouse gases .................... 50 2.1. Hong Kong: the extraordinary affluent 4.3. Emissions of other pollutants.......................... 51 urban region....................................................19 4.3.1. Comparisons with other urban regions.....51 4.3.2. Trends in emissions .................................53 2.2. Hong Kong: the urban region in Asia..............28 4.3.3. Spatial intensity of emissions ...................58 4.3.4. Projections of emissions from transport ...59 3. LAND USE AND TRANSPORT ACTIVITY IN HONG 4.4. Air quality........................................................ 61 KONG.................................................................34 4.5. Noise .............................................................. 66 3.1. Settlement density ..........................................34 4.6. Casualties....................................................... 67 3.2. Recent transport trends ..................................37 3.2.1. Use of public transport............................. 37 4.7. Economic impacts .......................................... 68 ELECTRIFYING HONG KONG: MAKING TRANSPORT SUSTAINABLE PAGE 4 4.8. Social impacts.................................................72 7.5. Better integration and cooperation ............... 110 4.9. Concluding remarks........................................75 7.6. Key steps for the next 10-15 years............... 111 7.6.1. R&D capacity for tethered vehicles ........112 5. ENERGY FUTURES: A KEY FACTOR IN 7.6.2. Education about the need for change ....113 TRANSPORT PLANNING.........................................77 8. CONCLUDING REMARKS .....................................114 5.1. The end of cheap oil (and natural gas)?.........77 5.2. Moving towards sustainable energy use.........81 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS...........................................116 5.3. Sustainable energy for Hong Kong.................83 NOTE ON THE AUTHOR ...........................................117 6. MOVING TOWARDS SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORT IN HONG KONG.......................................................91 END NOTES..........................................................118 6.1. Requirements for sustainable transport..........91 6.2. Transport in Hong Kong is not on a sustainable trajectory......................................94 6.3. Meeting the sustainability requirements .........95 6.3.1. Overall considerations ............................. 95 6.3.2. Moving people ......................................... 98 6.3.3. Moving freight........................................ 100 6.3.4. Non-motorised transport........................ 102 7. IMPLEMENTING THE ALL-ELECTRIC OPTION ...........104 7.1. Movement of people .....................................104 7.2. Movement of freight ......................................107 7.3. Aviation and marine transport issues............108 7.4. Paying the cost of it all..................................109 ELECTRIFYING HONG KONG: MAKING TRANSPORT SUSTAINABLE PAGE 5 Summary This document’s title, Electrifying Hong Kong, re- of the existing fleet of large and small diesel buses flects its central proposal, which is that over the to trolleybuses, with development of necessary in- next 30 years transport in Hong Kong should be- frastructure. come essentially entirely fuelled by electricity gen- erated from renewable sources. This is proposed Proposals made in the document regarding goods as a way of Making Transport Sustainable in Hong transport are less specific. This is because less is Kong—hence the second part of the title. known now about goods transport, there is more uncertainty about how it might unfold, and less ex- Hong Kong’s transport is proposed to be electrified perience with a central part of the strategy that is in part by a major increase in passenger rail ser- proposed. This strategy involves the use of trolley vices. This is nothing new; indeed much of what is lorries, similar to trollybuses, but replacing lorries proposed here has also been proposed by the rather than buses. There would also be an unspeci- Hong Kong Government. Additions are proposed fied increase in the amount of freight transport by here for implementation between the Government’s rail, and perhaps also more trans-border freight planning horizon of 2016 and this document’s hori- transport by water. zon, which is 2032. The overarching framework for the development of What is entirely new is the proposal that the rest of the proposed transport scenario is a proposed en- the passenger transport system be electrified. The ergy scenario for Hong Kong. The energy scenario main feature of this electrification is transformation accepts as likely projections that the end of cheap ELECTRIFYING HONG KONG: MAKING TRANSPORT SUSTAINABLE PAGE 6 oil will occur during the present decade and the end The proposal that Hong Kong should become the of cheap natural gas before 2032. The scenario has all-electric city is made in direct response to the Hong Kong moving towards an all-electric energy consideration of what sustainable transport should economy based on renewable generation. mean for Hong Kong. The early part of this document is a substantial re- The document concludes with recognition that what view of the Hong Kong transport system and its is proposed for Hong Kong is dramatic and far- impacts. The review concludes that, mostly be- reaching, and that it could also bring major eco- cause of its settlement density, Hong Kong is per- nomic benefits. These benefits would arise from haps the closest to transport sustainability among being a technology leader in the matter of tethered the world’s affluent urban regions. However, there vehicles, including road vehicles such as trolley- are disturbing trends in transport activity and trans- buses and trolley lorries, and also trains and trams. port-related impacts. Establishment of a Tethered Vehicle Institute is pro- posed to ensure exploitation of this opportunity. The critical matter is that although Hong Kong’s overall emissions of pollution from transport are Also proposed is a massive public education sys- relatively low, they occur in such a small space tem to alert citizens as to the need for change and there are major and worsening air pollution prob- the reasons for the particular changes that are pro- lems. Noise is also a potential concern. posed. If the proposed scenarios are adopted, Hong Kong will be forging new paths. Hong Kong The document contains elaboration of what is residents as a whole should support such ventures meant by ‘sustainable transport’ and how it can be into the relative unknown. quantified. Sustainable transport is defined for Hong Kong taking into account what has been agreed elsewhere and adapting it to Hong Kong’s particular circumstances. ELECTRIFYING HONG KONG: MAKING TRANSPORT SUSTAINABLE PAGE 7 1. Introduction 1.1. Sustainability: securing the well-being of seven generations of new faces Sustainable has become Sustainable has become a popular word among policy-makers. It is used instead of a popular word well-performing or viable or just plain good. When policy-makers describe a road system as sustainable, they could mean many things: the roads go where people want to travel; they carry traffic with little congestion and few collisions; or, per- haps above all, their construction and maintenance costs are affordable. Special use of ‘sustainable’ by Environmental scientists use the terms sustainable and sustainability in a special environmentalists way. They are concerned with long-term impacts on plant and animal systems in- cluding human populations. They are concerned too about the use of non- renewable resources such as oil and natural gas.1† Something is sustainable if it can keep going more or less indefinitely. This means it has to use renewable re- sources and have small, non-cumulative impacts on the environment. † The superscript numbers refer to 155 End Notes that begin on Page 118. The End Notes contain details of the sources cited in the text as well as additional information and discussion. ELECTRIFYING HONG KONG:
Recommended publications
  • Asia-Express Logistics Holdings Limited 亞 洲 速 運 物 流 控 股 有 限
    IMPORTANT If you are in any doubt about any of the contents of this prospectus, you should obtain independent professional advice. Asia-express Logistics Holdings Limited 亞 洲 速運物 流 控 股 有 限 公 司 (incorporated in the Cayman Islands with limited liability) LISTING ON GEM OF THE STOCK EXCHANGE OF HONG KONG LIMITED BY WAY OF SHARE OFFER Number of Offer Shares : 120,000,000 Shares Number of Placing Shares : 108,000,000 Shares (subject to reallocation) Number of Public Offer Shares : 12,000,000 Shares (subject to reallocation) Offer Price : Not more than HK$0.58 per Offer Share and expected to be not less than HK$0.42 per Offer Share plus brokerage of 1%, Stock Exchange trading fee of 0.005% and SFC transaction levy of 0.0027% (payable in full on application, subject to refund on final pricing) Nominal value : HK$0.01 per Share Stock code : 8620 Sole Sponsor South China Capital Limited Joint Bookrunners and Joint Lead Managers China Tonghai Securities Limited Wealth Link Securities Limited South China Securities Limited Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Limited, The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited and Hong Kong Securities Clearing Company Limited take no responsibility for the contents of this prospectus, make no representation as to its accuracy or completeness and expressly disclaim any liability whatsoever for any loss howsoever arising from or in reliance upon the whole or any part of the contents of this prospectus. A copy of this prospectus, together with the documents specified in the section headed ‘‘Documents Delivered to the Registrar of Companies and Available for Inspection — Documents Delivered to the Registrar of Companies’’ in Appendix V to this prospectus, has been registered by the Registrar of Companies in Hong Kong as required by section 342C of the Companies (Winding Up and Miscellaneous Provisions) Ordinance (Chapter 32 of the Laws of Hong Kong).
    [Show full text]
  • Kowloon ¡V Canton Railway Corporation
    STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT KEY ISSUES REPORT Hyder - Mott Connell Joint Venture This report is prepared by Hyder-Mott Connell Joint Venture for information and discussion purposes. The findings and recommendations do not necessarily represent the views of the HKSARG. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 2. INFLUENCING FACTORS AND KEY ISSUES 3. ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS AND KEY ISSUES 4. POTENTIAL SOLUTIONS REFERENCES ABBREVIATIONS 1 1. Introduction 1.1 Background 1.1.1 The HK2030: Planning Vision and Strategy (Main Study) is a strategic planning study tasked with preparing a strategic land use planning framework for Hong Kong for a period of 30 years. It will address ‘how much, what type and where land for development should be provided’. 1.1.2 The Government is committed to supporting and promoting sustainable development and to this end major policy and strategy initiatives must undergo a sustainability assessment. Under the overall goal of adhering to the principle of sustainable development, a planning objective of the HK2030 Study is to provide a good quality living environment. To achieve this, we need to strike a balance in the demand for, and supply of, environmental resources and a Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) is being undertaken as an integral part of the HK2030 Study. 1.1.3 To put the SEA into context, it is important to note that the Main Study involves four key stages of work viz: Stage 1: Agenda Setting, Baseline Review and Identification of Key Issues Stage 2: Examination of Key Issues Stage 3: Formulation and Evaluation of Scenarios and Options Stage 4: Formulation of Development Strategies and Response Plans 1.1.4 The SEA is being integrated with the Main Study by providing environmental input at all stages.
    [Show full text]
  • A Research of Lived Experience on Commuting by Bus in Hong Kong
    A research of lived experience on commuting by bus in Hong Kong Lau Wai In, Debbie 1. Hong Kong and Transportation The people’s daily commute in Hong Kong mostly only takes half an hour to one hour. More than half of the Hong Kong people rely on public transportation for their trips on weekdays (Transport Department, 2011). According to the Transport Department, only around 14 percent of the households had private cars available for their uses. Public transportation shares a big part of daily life for most local people, ranging from children to the elderly. It connects every district of Hong Kong, making the local trips much more convenient. Apart from the heavy reliance on commuting, there is even a particular group of people who share their mania over public transport. In Hong Kong, there are terms called “bus plastic” (baa1 gaau1) and “train plastic” (tit3 gaau1), which commonly describe people who have an unusual and extreme interest in bus and MTR. It raises several questions in my mind. Why do Hong Kong people insist to take public transport in their everyday life? What does public transport mean to Hong Kong people? Are they just a machine or something far more complicated? Conventionally, passengers taking public transportation are seen as a passive subject comparing with walking and cycling, as there are fewer motions while being carried by the vehicles and lack of willingness to pursue their purposes (Scheldeman, 2011, p.129). This kind of perspective is rather applicable to me since I seldom enjoy my trips on public transport.
    [Show full text]
  • ERP PE1 Report Eng 170116 Clean A
    Table of Contents page no. Chapter 1 Background 1 Chapter 2 Public Engagement Exercise 6 Chapter 3 Summary of Views on Basic Elements and 13 Pertinent Issues of the Pilot Scheme Basic elements (1) Charging area 13 (2) Charging mechanism 16 (3) Charging period 17 (4) Charging level 19 (5) Exemption and concession 21 (6) Technology 25 Pertinent issues (1) Privacy concerns 29 (2) Effectiveness 31 (3) Complementary measures 32 (4) Other issues 36 Chapter 4 Way Forward 42 Abbreviations 46 Annexes Annex 1 Major meetings and events held during the public engagement exercise Annex 2 A summary of views of various stakeholder groups on the Pilot Scheme Annex 3 A brief summary of three “opinion surveys” conducted by non-governmental organisations Annex 4 A summary of views gathered at focus group meetings, District Council forum and meetings with transport trades Annex 5 A breakdown and numbers of submissions received from various channels Annex 6 A list of all submissions received and their originators (except those requested by their originators to remain anonymous) Annex 7 Copies of all submissions received (except those requested by their originators to remain confidential) Annex 8 The 13 questions on the basic elements and pertinent issues of the Pilot Scheme set out in the public engagement document Annex 9 The Transport Department’s written reply to the Central and Western District Council (C&W DC) Secretariat in response to the motion on the Pilot Scheme passed by the C&W DC (Chinese version only) Chapter 1 Background Overview 1.1 This chapter sets out the background of planning for an Electronic Road Pricing Pilot Scheme (“the Pilot Scheme”) in Central and its adjacent areas (“Central District”), the objectives of public engagement exercise and an outline of the contents of this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Dossier: Vivre Et Travailler À Hong Kong
    VIVRE ET TRAVAILLER A HONG KONG Index 1. Vue d’ensemble ....................................................................................................................................... 1 2. Formalités d’entrée et visas .................................................................................................................. 2 3. Importation et douane .......................................................................................................................... 6 4. Vaccinations et Santé ............................................................................................................................. 9 5. Annonce et séjour ................................................................................................................................. 10 6. Travail ....................................................................................................................................................... 11 7. Prévoyance et assurances ................................................................................................................... 14 8. Impôts ...................................................................................................................................................... 18 9. Regroupement familial, mariages et partenariats ........................................................................ 19 10. Ecoles et éducation .............................................................................................................................. 20 11.
    [Show full text]
  • An Investigation of Whether Hong Kong Residents' Social Identity
    An investigation of whether Hong Kong residents’ social identity affects their attitude towards Mainland Chinese tourists JAMIE PRIESTLEY A thesis submitted to the University of Huddersfield in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master by Research September 2017 COPYRIGHT STATEMENT i. The author of this thesis (including any appendices and/ or schedules to this thesis) owns any copyright in it (the “Copyright”) and s/he has given The University of Huddersfield the right to use such Copyright for any administrative, promotional, educational and/or teaching purposes. ii. Copies of this thesis, either in full or in extracts, may be made only in accordance with the regulations of the University Library. Details of these regulations may be obtained from the Librarian. Details of these regulations may be obtained from the Librarian. This page must form part of any such copies made. iii. The ownership of any patents, designs, trademarks and any and all other intellectual property rights except for the Copyright (the “Intellectual Property Rights”) and any reproductions of copyright works, for example graphs and tables (“Reproductions”), which may be described in this thesis, may not be owned by the author and may be owned by third parties. Such Intellectual Property Rights and Reproductions cannot and must not be made available for use without permission of the owner(s) of the relevant Intellectual Property Rights and/or Reproductions. 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank both my supervisors, Dr Brendan Canavan and Dr Qing Shan Ding for their continuous support and knowledge in the completion of this research.
    [Show full text]
  • MTR Train Service Performance
    Transport Research Office Legislative Council Secretariat ISSH07/17-18 MTR train service performance Figure 1 – Usage of public transport in Hong Kong Highlights (a) Usage rate among selected cities (b) Usage by modes Public transport is the most dominant mode of commuting in Hong Kong, and its usage rate has been among the highest for major 12.6 million cities in the world (Figure 1a). In 2016, the passenger trips * total number of daily public transport per day in 2016 passenger trips in Hong Kong exceeded 12 million. MTR was the most heavily used mode of public transport, carrying over five million passengers and accounting for Public light buses Taxis Others (incl. trams, ferries, residents' 41% of all trips made on public transport services and MTR buses.) each day (Figure 1b). Note: (*) Figures may not add up to the total due to rounding. Being the busiest public transport mode, MTR has experienced a steady increase in its Figure 2 – Number of average daily public transport daily patronage over the past decade passenger trips by selected modes, 2007-2016 (Figure 2). This contrasted with the (million) stagnant or negative growth in the daily MTR patronage of other commonly used public Franchised buses transport modes in Hong Kong. Against the above, MTR has been the Public light buses backbone of public transport system in Hong Kong, comprising 11 heavy rail lines and 12 Light Rail routes. Looking ahead, Taxis upon the completion of the two new railway projects currently under construction Figure 3 – Proposed railway network in 2031 (i.e. the Guangzhou-Shenzhen-Hong Kong Express Rail Link (Hong Kong Section) and the Existing/committed railway network Shatin to Central Link), in tandem with the Proposed railway scheme implementation of railway proposals Proposed station recommended in the Railway Development Strategy 2014, about 75% of the population in Hong Kong will be brought into MTR's catchment areas by 2031 (Figure 3).
    [Show full text]
  • Enhanced Train Services
    My schedule is more flexible with the Enhanced Train Services. Shared Journeys 26 MTR Corporation It’s convenient You will find a new to take the new Public Toilet Lift to the station! over there! Annual Report 2012 27 Executive Management’s Report MTR’s sustainable transport system underpins the Hong Kong economy Hong Kong Transport Operations Added Train frequencies of Added Airport Express 231 improved to 1,200 Seats Train Trips at 50 stations per week 10minutes 28 MTR Corporation Total patronage on our Domestic Service reached a record 1,431.0 million, a 4.7% increase over 2011, supported by solid economic growth and increased tourist arrivals. Our Domestic Service comprises the Kwun Tong, Tsuen Wan, Island, Tung Chung, Tseung Kwan O, Disneyland Resort, East Rail (excluding Cross-boundary Service), West Rail and Ma On Shan lines. The Cross-boundary Service to Lo Wu and Lok Ma Chau reported patronage of 109.7 million in 2012, a 5.6% increase over 2011. Passenger traffic on the Airport Express increased by 7.6% as compared with 2011 to 12.7 million, supported by an increase in air travel to and from Hong Kong as well as service frequency enhancement. Passenger volume on Light Rail and Bus services in 2012 was 213.2 million, a 3.9% increase over 2011, while patronage on Intercity service was 4.0 million, increasing by 6.4%. Average Weekday Patronage Average weekday patronage for all of our rail and bus passenger services in Hong Kong rose by 4.5% to 5.07 million trips in 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Transit As a Tourist Attraction: Hong Kong
    PUBLIC TRANSIT AS A TOURIST ATTRACTION: HONG KONG Jakob Lazzaro HIST 3076 – Dr. John Carroll 17 December 2018 4276 Words LAZZARO 2 Like many major cities, Hong Kong has an expansive public transportation system. Made up of a patchwork of companies connected only by the mighty Octopus card, this intermodal network literally keeps the city functioning thanks to its ability to move millions of people quickly and efficiently every single day. For visitors, Hong Kong’s public transportation is both a means of getting from point A to point B and a tourist attraction. It’s a part of the unique cityscape, interwoven with the intoxicating urban fabric of towering skyscrapers looming over streets squeezed on the edges of islands between mountain peaks and lapping waves. But that doesn’t mean all public transportation is equal under the tourist gaze. Historic conveyances such as the Star Ferry, Hong Kong Tramways and the Peak Tram are praised as a way of experiencing the ‘authentic’ old Hong Kong while the MTR, Light Rail, outlying island ferries, double-decker buses, and minibuses are only discussed in a practical sense. Despite carrying the majority of the city’s commuters and thus being the most demonstrably ‘authentic’ representation of modern Hong Kong, the bulk of the city’s public transportation is portrayed having little intrinsic tourist value. But this three-pronged portrayal of public transportation in tourist-oriented media highlights the farce of the continual tug-of-war over authenticity between ‘travelers’ and ‘tourists.’ Although one group is ostensibly more ‘authentic’ than the other, both present a similar perspective on Hong Kong’s public transportation in their categorizations of what is a standalone tourist attraction versus a mere way of travelling to the things worth seeing.1 The largest continuity between the supposedly different ‘travelers’ and ‘tourists’ is their never-ending search for the ‘authentic’ Old Hong Kong, and the Star Ferry gladly delivers.
    [Show full text]
  • Createspace Word Templates
    Marko van Gaans InA Disjointed the MomentAudiobiography Wu-Wei Institute Press Hong Kong wuwei-inst.org This is a work of creative nonfiction. All the stories in this book are true, but many names have been omitted and/or identifying details have been changed to protect the pri- vacy of the people involved. The dialogues all come from the author’s recollections but they might not be the exact words spoken at the time and are not written to represent word-for-word transcripts. Ra- ther, the author has retold them in a way that evokes the feeling and meaning of what was said and the essence of the dialogues is always accurate. MMXVI This work is the intellectual property of Marko van Gaans, licensed under a Creative Commons International License. CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 ISBN: 1537269143 ISBN-13: 978-1537269146 Cover art: Mark Rothko’s № 61 Rust and Blue Phoenix (p.9) by Takihisa Tribal Graffiti To my parents, wife and son. Life can only be understood backwards, but must be lived forwards. Søren Kierkegaard Playlist 1. Far l'Amore (Smyge Mig Som Støv) — Vientiane | May 2016 11 2. Creep! — The Hague, the Netherlands | October 1992 15 3. Cachaça Mecânica — Guatemala City, Guatemala | July 2000 17 4. Nakupenda — Mombasa, Kenya | March 2001 19 5. Wilmot — Route 4B, Bosnia-Herzegovina | November 1996 22 6. Hell is Round the Corner — Little India, Singapore | 11 September 2001 26 7. Mucho Mambo Sway — Playa del Carmen, Mexico | July 2000 29 8. Every Breath You Take — Prachuap Khiri Khan, Thailand | February 1999 32 9.
    [Show full text]
  • 13Th HC Mtg Confirmed Minutes
    13th Meeting of Harbourfront Commission held at 3:00 pm on 2 May 2013 at the Conference Room on Upper Ground Floor, Hong Kong Heritage Discovery Centre, Kowloon Park, Haiphong Road, Tsim Sha Tsui, Kowloon, Hong Kong Minutes of Meeting Present Mr Nicholas Brooke Chair Mr Paul Chan Vice-Chair Mrs Margaret Brooke Representing Business Environment Council Prof Becky Loo Representing Chartered Institute of Logistics and Transport in Hong Kong Mr Lam Kin-lai Representing the Conservancy Association Mr Andy Leung Representing Hong Kong Institute of Architects Mr Tam Po-yiu Representing Hong Kong Institute of Planners Ir Dr Chan Fuk-cheung Representing Hong Kong Institution of Engineers Mr Louis Loong Representing Real Estate Developers Association of Hong Kong Mr Paul Zimmerman Representing Society for Protection of the Harbour Ms Dilys Chau Ms Lily Chow Mr Vincent Ng Ms Ann So Mr Jeffrey Chim Assistant Commissioner 2 (Acting), Tourism Commission (TC) Mr Albert Lee Assistant Commissioner/Urban, Transport Department (TD) Mr Hon Chi-keung Director of Civil Engineering and Development Miss Margrit Li Assistant Director (Leisure Services)1, Leisure and Cultural Services Department (LCSD) Mr Fung Kwok-ming Assistant Director/Planning and Services, Marine Department (MD) Mr Ling Kar-kan Director of Planning Mrs Winnie Kang Secretary In Attendance Mr Thomas Chow Permanent Secretary for Development (Planning and Lands) Mr Thomas Chan Deputy Secretary (Planning and Lands)1, Development Bureau (DEVB) Mr Henry Ho Political Assistant to Secretary for Development
    [Show full text]
  • 5P Wong Chun to My Opinion of Transport in Hong Kong I Like
    5P Wong Chun To My Opinion of Transport in Hong Kong I like travelling by minibus in Hong Kong but I do not like the MTR. The minibuses are my favourite type of transport. Travelling by minibus is comfortable. The seats in minibuses are soft. They are equipped with air-conditioning. The passengers are also quiet. It is not crowded to travel by minibus. We can always get a seat and the trip is relaxing. Travelling by minibus is fast too. It takes less than forty-five minutes from Kwun Tong to Chai Wan. It takes more than an hour going the same route by bus! I hate travelling by MTR for several reasons. Although travelling by MTR is fast, it is uncomfortable. The seats in the MTR are hard. The passengers are also very noisy. The trip is boring because I can’t see any view. Travelling by MTR is inconvenient too. The station is far from my home and I often have to change MTR lines. Sometimes I have to stand for a long time because the MTR is very crowded. The queue is long too. I hate travelling by MTR. The trip is stressful and unpleasant! I really hate travelling by MTR! I think the MTR is the worst transport in Hong Kong, and minibuses are the best! 5P Ip Sik Kuen My Opinion of Transport in Hong Kong There are many kinds of transport in Hong Kong, for example, bus, taxi, MTR…… I like travelling by taxi but I don’t like travelling by MTR. Taxis are my favourite type of transport.
    [Show full text]