This article was downloaded by: 10.3.98.104 On: 26 Sep 2021 Access details: subscription number Publisher: Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG, UK

Routledge Handbook of Interpretive Political Science

Mark Bevir, R. A. W. Rhodes

Idealist Legacies

Publication details https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9781315725314.ch3 Naomi Choi Published online on: 22 Jul 2015

How to cite :- Naomi Choi. 22 Jul 2015, Idealist Legacies from: Routledge Handbook of Interpretive Political Science Routledge Accessed on: 26 Sep 2021 https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9781315725314.ch3

PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR DOCUMENT

Full terms and conditions of use: https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/legal-notices/terms

This Document PDF may be used for research, teaching and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproductions, re-distribution, re-selling, loan or sub-licensing, systematic supply or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden.

The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The publisher shall not be liable for an loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material. Downloaded By: 10.3.98.104 At: 17:44 26 Sep 2021; For: 9781315725314, chapter3, 10.4324/9781315725314.ch3 rne htters flnusi nlssadlgclpstvs nBiani h wnit cen- twentieth themes the idealist in how Britain show in will positivism chapter This logical ‘ philosophy. and idealist analysis curtailed linguistic wholly of tury rise the that behaviour. the that of positivists, by granted tradition explained human and relevant be the rationalists the should in in activity against claims Political proceeding insisted, moral history. of from and example, way only wisdom for come a could Oakeshott, as knowledge whole. extension hermeneutic political for a by argued as and Collingwood to history G. sciences alternatives R. main understanding and par- the those to Oakeshott provided In and Michael approaches phenomenology sciences. century, as as nineteenth human such such late the Idealists traditions the positivism. in of continental disciplines mantle to of idealist turned number the who a inherited who of across philosophers from role ticular, and ineluctable emphasis speaking. an varying strictly is with politics, of there science that a argue impossible makes Interpretivists that operations. interpretation law-like toward under directions meanings positivist rejected theories de scienti a Interpretive the crafting inferences. of permit to permissible unity both of the logic structures formal govern about the of that optimism power regularities great the or in denoted laws faith Positivism uncover and life. to was political objective and human The the social biology. within and trends chemistry, positivistic physics, emerging to be to century, endeavoured twentieth sciences the social of and decades early the Since testa ou oeyo tngah samtoooyfryedn hc knowledge. to thick contrast yielding in for methodology idealism, a on as draws ethnography that on solely science focus political that interpretive others the moment of advancing pivotal by example a so de contemporary constitutes did studies that They interpretive contest of Circle. deal Taylor a empiricists, Vienna great in the new a of positivism the which members against against oppose and Charles interpretation to Carnap by of ideas and studies importance idealist Ayer political adapted J. post-war creatively A. into like Hampshire and Hampshire, and Stuart Berlin and Taylor. Berlin Isaiah like thinkers de freedom thick hl nepeietere rwpoon nprto rmiels ti fe ae for taken often is it idealism from inspiration profound drew theories interpretive While thought of schools philosophical several upon drawn have theories interpretive Historically, ’ ’ ocpino esn n hsvtls nlsso eaiu,adapstv ocpinof conception positive a and behaviour, of analysis vitalist thus and persons of conception nepeiim icse eo.Tecatred ihdsuso faconcrete a of discussion with ends chapter The below. discussed interpretivism, s ‘ cec fpolitics of science fi e ihnsca context social within ned DAITLEGACIES IDEALIST ’ codn owihhmnatoswudhv obe to have would actions human which to according , ‘ scienti – am Choi Naomi esse hog h ieo igitcaayi through analysis linguistic of rise the through persisted fi c 3 ’ 45 nbodytesm es httetr sapplied is term the that sense same the broadly in fi e tef trigwt h pnn htof shot opening the with starting itself, ned fi iino btatosadt describe to and abstractions of nition fi e ntheir in xed fi – method c uha a as such Downloaded By: 10.3.98.104 At: 17:44 26 Sep 2021; For: 9781315725314, chapter3, 10.4324/9781315725314.ch3 hlspycudlgtmtl i osyb the de by and say empiricism, to Humean aim reconstructing legitimately the by could be tradition purge philosophy idealist to to German took sought the they empiricists from order what new religious by or the social and Motivated political, speculation idealists, and positivism. meaningless absolute of utilitarian logical of philosophy of both perspective form metaphysical to the excessive opposition in in empiricism new responsibility could social Party advocated Labour British it the German that a Darwinism. as defend ideas in to on socialist helped religion Christian draw also and non-Marxist It to science sciences. contributed reconciling further geological scholarship, Christianity the of historical and defence a biblical Darwinism providing by from particular in threats thought, against intellectual and social British British and in Bradley early needs opposite Bradley utilitarian pluralism, opposed of the criticized Seth account an Andrew of staunchly into Cambridge, di idealists, enthusiasm At a perspective. later advanced Christian neo-Hegelian but the a philosophy the from of British neither ethics evangelical individualism in Kantian for shared chairs the backbone leading nor who quasi-metaphysical the a neo-Hegelians Bradley, of provided all Green and climate nearly H. intellectual liberalism; the held T. dominated Oxford, idealists idealism At 1920s, absolute departments. the I, War Until World Britain. to in prior and 1860s, the Since rts tako daima h uno h etr aei h omo ltncraimby realism Platonic of adaptable form readily the for became and in then Ayer came down laid like century they positivists the arguments logical of the for 1971), turn (Magee the Russell at and Moore idealism on attack British vrdylf,ucmlctdb h rpig fhgfltnpioohclconstructions. in philosophical concepts highfalutin used bottom, actually of at people trappings seeking, how the analysis, of by linguistic analysis uncomplicated as linguistic life, solely with philosophy everyday theorizing of normative task replace the recast to Weldon, D. T. and a which displaying of statement a truth or the terms; tautology, constituent its logical of a veri meanings for either the potential types: through ascertained two be of could were In philosophical propositions the theory. and philosophical normative morality about of statements of import meaningfulness the challenged systematically ihterrjcino hth okt eteecse fHgla pclto n obscurity. and speculation Hegelian the of curbed excesses that the initially discipline be a was impressed philosophy to Berlin was upon took Yet, analysis. and imposed he new positivists, positivism of what generation. the logical Logical rise of the of the rejection previous of methods their through through empiricism the and anti-metaphysical with ideas Austin, vigorous aims idealist of the and the sustain to Ayer shadows opposed drawn to they of helped the how and generation from show empiricists younger contributions emerged the philosophical of philosophy their part Oxford much whom very were Hampshire, hooywr suosaeet,nihrtu o as u ennls,o tbs merely best at or meaningless, but false dislike. nor and true like of neither statements pseudo-statements, were de theology a advocate to positivism Logical rges n omtett lrt fagmn n esnn.H a eymc nfavour piecemeal in much sober very ensure was He to reasoning. and promised argument that of clarity analysis to commitment logico-linguistic a of and progress, method a pretension, rts idealism British samte fhsoy elnadhsflo on aia hlspe reda Oxford, at friend philosopher radical young fellow his and Berlin history, of matter a As daimtruhaayi:Bri n Hampshire and Berlin analysis: through Idealism fi ff ’ fl ainby cation nwrt omtv ocrs hs rt usin fmrlt a simply was morality of questions to or thus, concerns, normative to answer s fl rn tadof strand erent toayeoiim codn owihcam fehc,ashtc,and aesthetics, ethics, of claims which to according emotivism, ationary uihdutli was it until ourished ‘ – sense-data n otk hlspyoto h id hysuh obreak to sought They mind. the of out philosophy take to and ‘ riaylanguage Ordinary agae rt,adLogic and Truth, Language, ‘ esnlidealism, personal ’ ‘ eie rmata rpsil xeine(yr1936). (Ayer experience possible or actual from derived riaylnug philosophers language ordinary nearly am Choi Naomi Weltanschauung ’ oim boueiels evdt etseveral meet to served idealism Absolute monism. s 46 vrae yters flnusi nlss n a and analysis, linguistic of rise the by overtaken ’ hlspes oevr uha .L Austin L. J. as such moreover, philosophers, ‘ rnil fveri of principle ’ hc .E cagr ute developed further McTaggart E. J. which – yrly u o l genuine all how out lays Ayer , r eomnain famoral, a of recommendations or, fi ‘ cation ihrsynthesis higher ’ fl ieAsi,woeach who Austin, like gt fphilosophical of ights ’ hl h initial the While . fi igwhat ning ’ n it And . Downloaded By: 10.3.98.104 At: 17:44 26 Sep 2021; For: 9781315725314, chapter3, 10.4324/9781315725314.ch3 neetdi hlspya iewe philosophy when time a at directions positivist philosophy from in life interested human moral into and inquiry narrowly and issues philosophy epistemological the where between anti-naturalism concerned. applying positivists defended connections were and indivisible, opposed logical ones; and political staunchly the strong, and the they and on experience, Ayer insisted in that insistence empiricist philosophy empiricism ‘ the frustrated supported of grounding became undoubtedly he Hampshire version on and But Berlin experience. scientistic both While in narrowly propounded. philosophy grounding the on with insistence empiricist the of eeo s i h rnil fveri of principle the (i) of as: develop paradigm the a as science having natural sentences regarded that of observations. a science veri scienti conditions of joined and and view the Berlin knowledge empiricist meaning with Souls, an largely between and All concerned was perception; connections at College mainly agenda fellowship the New was philosophical prize at meaning; group whose a lecturer positivism The Oxford attacked to as at Hampshire. whom logical elected philosophy of empiricists by was teaching both rebellious he set Berlin began Wilson, of year Cook time, he generation same John his time new and the of the Moore 1932, culture By of in intellectual on. realism changing the head in the idealism steeped in With was then Bradley. he was and College, Christi Bosanquet, knowledge Corpus of Green, at source studies a his as began philosophy of conception traditional Tractatus onaino ahmtc.H eetdtemtpyiso oia tms n rudthat Ayer argued propositions veri of ultimate and problematic their sceptical philosophically atomism display remained to that logical British paraphrased and of be classical linguistic; to metaphysics needed essentially the the is rejected recast analysis traditional Circle He philosophical in and mathematics. Vienna interested more positivists, of the was foundation Austin Circle than materials. linguistic issues Vienna and epistemological Ramsey, logical with Moore, in it Russell, Hume Wittgenstein when of of analysis emotivism empiricism early Cambridge or the the synthesized non-cognitivism Ayer ethical and morality. of (iv) issues and to experience; came subjective to propositions veri with ai nto nlsssc ssnedt or sense-data as such analysis of unit basic nevu ordc l xlnto oapiiee aeoyo ai rpstos(eln1978: (Berlin propositions basic of category privileged a to explanation 12 all reduce to Berlin endeavour in calls and present personality, are called even positivism and logical history critiquing of study an the for employs which interpretation, imaginative h ua cecs hc vraswt h itr fies elncle for called Berlin ideas. of history be the should with philosophy in understanding overlaps which to which life, approach hermeneutic human sciences, a of advocated human he complexities the particular, the In illuminate. distort to that employed say legitimately can scientistic – ntewrso enr ilas Berlin Williams, Bernard of words the In yrbcm oia positivism logical became Ayer elnrjce the rejected Berlin 1.FrBri,Ayer Berlin, For 31). ‘ Veri ‘ inside-view fi as ’ blt;(i h imsa fmtpyisa osne ii h euto falempirical all of reduction the (iii) nonsense; as metaphysics of dismissal the (ii) ability; fi iwo nweg nei otentrlsine ohmneprec.They experience. human to sciences natural the to endemic knowledge of view ‘ cation h pnn hti h ra oiiitcmag nrvl gis h entire the against revolt in campaign positivist great the in shot opening the ’ ’ ulse n13,Bri udmnal okisewt h philosophical the with issue took fundamentally Berlin 1939, in published prahi re oudrtn ua ie h nepeiebssfor bases interpretive The life. human understand to order in approach ‘ fi rnil fveri of principle hoya eecmedu n eeao fata n possible and actual of generator and compendium mere a as theory c ’ ’ tnado enn,peie ntetasain rreduction or translation, the on premised meaning, of standard s – Bri 98.Bri eal Ayer recalls Berlin 1978). (Berlin ’ ednyo rwn orsodnebtenwrsadsome and words between correspondence drawing of tendency s nldn h on yr utn aNb,Woly and Woozley, MacNabb, Austin, Ayer, young the including ’ fi edn xoet h eta eeso hc ehle to helped he which of tenets central the exponent, leading s ainacrigt hc ennflesi oeyidenti solely is meaningfulness which to according cation fi cation ‘ tmcfacts atomic Idealism ’ 47 ’ n te uhlmttoso htphilosophy what on limitations such other and ocr ihtelgco cec n the and science of logic the with concern s ‘ a ee oiiitbth a seriously was he but positivist a never was ’ aletpioohclwiig.I nessay an In writings. philosophical earliest s fi ’ fl aini xeine utn n Berlin, and Austin, experience. in cation . ecdb h rts idealists British the by uenced fi aincntudi em fsense of terms in construed cation ’ otpesn usin came questions pressing most s ’ 92ppro Wittgenstein on paper 1932 s ’ Bri 93 ) hnBerlin When 3). 1973: (Berlin verstehen – .H. T. ,or fi ed ’ s Downloaded By: 10.3.98.104 At: 17:44 26 Sep 2021; For: 9781315725314, chapter3, 10.4324/9781315725314.ch3 ‘ ie eed,adtetpso esnn nwihorblesrs,aentrdcbet formal to reducible not are rest, beliefs human our of which unfolding on the reasoning which of on certainties types the the of and most depends, because lives ideal impossible an is certainty edges the at blurred reality. human convey, than rather distort, ultimately that terms scienti ahistorical Regarding and abstract h cp fwa ol ecniee eiiaepioohcliqiy(eln17:33 1978: (Berlin inquiry philosophical legitimate on considered restriction veri be a of excessive could principle too what far The presented of experience scope possible or the actual of sense-data individual oiia hoy elnwskel wr ftecmlxt ftehmnwrd ftemany the are of world, that human and experience the social of human to complexity and up ideas the make of of history aware that the keenly would strands to was convictions role philosophy These Berlin the it. traditional theory. broadly recommend from political more to absolute away conduct and in him human perspective draw saw in historical eventually he purposes for cultural excesses appreciation and metaphysical its personal the least of at Despite saw philosophy. Berlin in idealism, insight for or imagination osdrbyrvsdi ti ob rvne rmbreeding from prevented be errors to eradicates is major it if exposing revised precision, considerably confusions, and clarity up for drive ing the had Thus, acknowledges problem. Berlin procedural which mere a into disagreement sophical qal roeu,apoce ofril siiaigalpooiin:()the (i) propositions: all assimilating a forcibly with 56 conjunction to in 1978: calls type approaches he (Berlin or substance what erroneous, certainty same drive, the equally reductivist for and a one need of rather terms but psychological in reality, understood or of to, perception reduced true a for the desire the not was positivist single logical a into the translated driving saw Berlin What fi bevto rddcinmatta h nyruet nweg a hog h natural the through was knowledge to route is only a certainty to the philosophy for that reduced demand which meant sciences, the deduction and or assumption hold observation the cannot fact world, the simply human and meaningfulness the reality, in of human exists criterion in self-defeating. knowledge single complexity of a and type variety of incorrigible awesome absolutely the no that given that sense-data), argued phenomenalism, perceived Berlin (e.g. immediately about type statements true thus to the one statements to (ii) all propositions and reduce all to assimilate sought to which sought which approach, rv o lrt n rcso evdt bieaerte hnt lcdt h important the elucidate to the than in describe rather to used obliterate was to language that served the matter since subject precision the unacceptable and in was distinctions dichotomies clarity clear-cut way for on The experience. depended drive sense-data languages immediate perfect than logically other such things invoking requires inevitably mistaken world being of fear or sense-data doubt possible veri or be real could what to meaning ihu residue without l faayi hlspy,Bri led aecerhsciiu fcranfrso analysis. of forms certain of critique his clear made already Berlin philosophy), analytic of eld elnwstobe yteetn owihtenweprcs osre xeinein experience construed empiricism new the which to extent the by troubled was Berlin In h e empiricism new The ‘ oinFallacy Ionian ‘ ‘ creating oia Translation Logical ’ Bri 98 2 mhssadded). emphasis 12, 1978: (Berlin ‘ ’ in rasrigteeitneo hnsta elnblee didn believed Berlin that things of existence the asserting or fl ’ faygniepioohclsnec oasto rpstosdsrbn the describing propositions of set a to sentence philosophical genuine any of , ationary ’ fi hti,teernosasmto hteeyhn smd u f rcnbe can or of, out made is everything that assumption erroneous the is, that , hoyi ueyoeainls em a terms operationalist purely in theory c ’ fi ob etbeb slto Bri 00 4.H nesodta absolute that understood He 34). 2000: (Berlin isolation by testable be to ‘ ainhdteuwratdcneuneo unn n oeta philo- potential any turning of consequence unwarranted the had cation good ’ iwta opooiinhdmaiguls twsveri was it unless meaning had proposition no that view s ’ ’ wa swdl huh fa his as of thought widely is (what prahwihpstdette orsodn oalstatements, all to corresponding entities posited which approach – ’ rpoe yeo rpsto ob orc rgnieymeaningful genuinely or correct be to proposition of type proper or hti,t etitpiooh ool htcnb adwithout said be can what only to philosophy restrict to is, that fi – ‘ di em fpooiin osrce oeyo h ai of basis the on solely constructed propositions of terms in ed eiierl ntehsoyo oenpiooh,b clear- by philosophy, modern of history the in role decisive a a ocneni oslne ic osyayhn bu the about anything say to since silence, to it condemn to was ‘ adadnt h aua sciences natural the to handmaiden am Choi Naomi ’ eeteesneeded nevertheless , ’ li htasaeetms ecpbeo being of capable be must statement a that claim s 48 ‘ – o ay o iue too minute, too many, too 0.Bri identi Berlin 80). e fallacies new fi ff a otiuint h speci the to contribution nal re oro o historical for room no orded ‘ ob bnoe relse or abandoned be to npaeo hs hc it which those of place in fi dtodi two ed fi ’ s place. rst tbs.T reduce To best. at ’ xs tall. at exist t ‘ fl de ff eig too eeting, rn,yet erent, fl fi ationary beby able – 4). fi c ’ Downloaded By: 10.3.98.104 At: 17:44 26 Sep 2021; For: 9781315725314, chapter3, 10.4324/9781315725314.ch3 usin rsn nahsoial speci historically a in arising questions tak niels n ee hwditrs ntenwsyeo nltcphilosophy. analytic of style new the in deeply Berlin interest more Cook-Wilsonians showed the much is was never of was history it contemptuous all and Berlin argued was that Collingwood idealism Collingwood way, ways on idealism, this historicist the attacks In of recognizing traditions. brand while own and understanding, contexts of in social nature in to adoption existential embedded opposition their the for His essential exploring prove Taylor. thereof. would like students combination and his themes through some idealist continuation revived and to insight and or imagination, schemata, inductive veri or deductive betvt fwa srgre skolde swl sqetosaottecnttto of constitution the about questions the as language about well ordinary questions as of and knowledge, even history, as di in regarded of sceptical experience is importance human remained what the ultimately ever of could neglected Berlin positivism objectivity as logical systematically reason than philosophy which rich broader this culturally a analysis, to more for entail and must And attributed historical experience more human allow. are positivism of that categories tasks logical and of concepts range that the Collingwood understanding role of to spirit means modest the in the was German ‘ disdained the It and Herder. Berlin Vico Johann Giambattista critic, that jurist, literary and and philosopher, theologian, historian, philosopher, Italian the like founders view Berlin broader to fostered much philosopher a Collingwood analytical implied allow. which any would life, than human to philosophy experience of their analyse and organize beings ruln eas ti poe ootooyadclscmol cetdassumptions potentially and accepted indispensable, and commonly valuable, calls it to makes and lead what orthodoxy that precisely is to confusions of that opposed and world but errors is question, the it and into light subversive it explain seem since of may to because and Philosophy validity activity harm. bringing the troubling real describe human do scrutinizing even for to for and essential experience, philosophy distort need and misunderstanding, of and usefulness human presuppositions important esoteric social ineradicable the even an subconscious on and abstract, nonetheless insisted tentative, vital Berlin is experience. is the it philosophy to that that dark responds the but held in He indirect, is wildly, not knowledge. which and and empirical of open, strictly the purpose in of the operate thus Berlin, and for themselves, Philosophy, 1978). (Berlin 1960s, early the in appeared o nyaeteasest hlspia usin hmevsi usinbtas h means the also but question in themselves questions philosophical to for answers so, the from another, are and to only place information not or and empirical to time of one by prior acquisition shaped from concepts. the be being varies basic and both to do experience shaping to Berlin, since categories experiences, we prior And our take which logically with reasoning. through up than thus deductive ideas tied are rather the closely and are that but world view them, of, the interpretive of sense the sense held made make Berlin are experience, of facts independent which of terms Kant seriously took He Berlin liberating. ertr oscience to secretary fl h ot fBerlin of roots The h rae iwo hlspyta elnhl a efuddsildi w sasthat essays two in distilled found be can held Berlin that philosophy of view broader The elncasdpiooh spr ftehmnsine,ada aigauiu ttsi that in status unique a having as and sciences, human the of part as philosophy classed Berlin ecdb .G olnwo hnb n te philosophical other any by than Collingwood G. R. by uenced fi ains,hscamo agrts o hlspy n h motneo history, of importance the and philosophy, for task larger a of claim his cationism, ’ ata eifi h motneo h ai ocpsadctgre ywihhuman which by categories and concepts basic the of importance the in belief Kantian s ’ praht hlspycmie cpia miiimwt neo-Kantianism. with empiricism sceptical a combined philosophy to approach s ’ and ’ ’ daimcnb eni i a his in seen be can idealism s ff itnto ewe atr ffc n h tutrso aeoisin categories or structures the and fact of matters between distinction s rn rsadclua situations. cultural and eras erent ‘ btaito metaphysics of obituarist ‘ h ups fPhilosophy of Purpose The ‘ thought fi e ftknfrgatdies olnwo reinforced Collingwood ideas. taken-for-granted of set c ’ neeti h itr fiesaditoue him introduced and ideas of history the in interest s Idealism ’ hr huh a eiso nwr ospeci to answers of series a was thought where , 49 ’ oesadpeupstosaotexperience about presuppositions and models s ’ codn oBri,piooh sthe as philosophy Berlin, to According . ffi ’ and iyfrahreetcapoc to approach hermeneutic a for nity ‘ osPltclTer tl Exist Still Theory Political Does ‘ oass e ounderstand to men assist to fi ’ uea xod ihhis With Oxford. at gure a ee eteobject the be never can , fi c ’ ’ Downloaded By: 10.3.98.104 At: 17:44 26 Sep 2021; For: 9781315725314, chapter3, 10.4324/9781315725314.ch3 elnisse httesr fkoldeec ogtmd di made In sought other. the each not knowledge and one of to sort appropriate goals the and that insisted Berlin emulate. to Berlin di paradigmatic seek thus fundamentally the should and are sciences sciences this human natural for the the that unsuited that knowledge distinctly belief of positivist are form the sciences to natural opposed staunchly The remained personality. the of not a empiricist through available and requires the Berlin, is history which experience for follow values, that but, should to and alone Heinrich access we beliefs, sciences that neo-Kantians di actions natural mind the in Like human fundamental bearing through understand the 11). experience, lived To on 1978: is to sciences. answer insisted commitment (Berlin an human he advance whether and judge Windelband, in natural and Wilhelm known evaluate to and be which Rickert by never standards can the and plausible, answers, at arriving for h meit otx ocnetteps ihtepeet nkeigwt i general his with keeping In beyond present. look the also with but context, past their the within connect ideas to set ‘ would context that immediate sensibility the historical thinker a ideas of a and observations sion of particular way No world the picture. mental the for overall feel good the understand Berlin intuitive a to terms. into an own be of individuals, stepping its importance to with by in that be it phenomena experience, meant presenting should direct human and This Berlin, from particular introspection. for derived of concern, from be uniqueness the merely only can example, not that for and themselves. humanity historian, others is of whole of with and task knowledge the interaction in a a contrast, life by such on human In based for of phenomena. particulars is necessary the which of saw that, understand Berlin classes regularities to what and is whole sciences similarities Precisely explain human on the can based of laws types, point general into establish categorizing to seek by latter the since divest sciences, cannot the begin we must in thought, we beings that Berlin human feelings. rather life, and other but motives judgements, human of our understanding study bases themselves our which To understanding for from experience of behaviour. our create kind of of insightful beings entirely an account human ourselves investi- requires vitalist and that the permits from as a world which objectively nature the and culture, and same the within study dispassionately the from of sciences nature inhabit of peculiarity human and of is The world the that di physical study. while matter studied the of subject without, studies be a object science having the must Natural its and gator. worlds in thinker consists human or sciences the observer human the and between natural relationship the that argued oi.Adi sti aaiyt eatr h iwo atclue n atae htBerlin that ages past and cultures past of their view as the important as recapture be to Herder to and capacity shown Vico were this in in personalities is salutes approach whose their it thinkers to preferred ideas key And constructing traced of His logic. of that work technique style themselves. the the historical analytical in on Collingwoodian actors origins conventional a stress but the the empathetic counterarguments, not and of an arguments decidedly favoured worldviews therefore Berlin and was sciences, philosophy purposes, natural the the of values, methods impersonal and hudb eue oasnl oe,ter,sadr,o da aefrasrn countervailing strong a for made ideal or standard, theory, model, single a to reduced be should inside-view olwn ioadDlhy elntogtta h aua n h ua sciences human the and natural the that thought Berlin Dilthey, and Vico Following elntogttehmnsine ol o ecnutdi h aewya h natural the as way same the in conducted be not could sciences human the thought Berlin lnsd eln Hampshire Berlin, Alongside ’ praht h xlnto fhmncnut hc shwdtedetached the eschewed which conduct, human of explanation the to approach ff rdi h eyntr ftesbetmte htte tde,i id and kind; in studied, they that matter subject the of nature very the in ered fi e ehdta ol esti dac ol copihtetransmis- the accomplish could advance in set be could that method xed ’ oeflsneo h elt ftepast. the of reality the of sense powerful s ’ qal togaderycnito htnteeyhn a or can everything not that conviction early and strong equally s ‘ thick ’ oino historical a of notion s am Choi Naomi ’ ocpino esn,i diint h td of study the to addition in persons, of conception 50 ‘ h ocp fScienti of Concept The Verstehen ‘ thick ’ es,o hti slk ohave to like is it what of sense, riaiaieunderstanding, imaginative or , ‘ ‘ nieview inside es freality of sense ff rn ehd,standards, methods, erent ff rnl eas fthe of because erently ff rnebtenthe between erence fi ’ ihnaplausible a within t fi fpeople of History c ’ a bu the about was ’ ’ goals, s Berlin Downloaded By: 10.3.98.104 At: 17:44 26 Sep 2021; For: 9781315725314, chapter3, 10.4324/9781315725314.ch3 fhmnitninlt swl steebde aueo ua gny scnb eni his in seen be can As bases agency. social human the of both nature seriously embodied take the to to as had themselves well ‘ we presented as that they intentionality meant as human This problems of agents. moral philosophy human the moral practical to shift as statements to people moral sought of properties Hampshire logical philosophy. the moral to bring related concepts as to our sought of Hampshire body, interconnectedness and scheme, The mind mind. conceptual the of of our on philosophy dualism in focusing the Cartesian intention to in the of closer Moreover, against argument role man agents. moral ramifying of self-willed the powers as on of active not and understanding and mistaken and cogitative the observers by uni of distorted passive unity is was as mind that of only philosophy action persons the that intentional insisted of of He independent scheme. primacy awareness, the passive for of states mental Cartesian as of primarily mind conceptual conditions. Hampshire possibility consciousness a bodily the error the on human of relied The of see assumption that tion mistake. the experience to was immediate empiricist failed of philosophy an the statements empiricist also who inherited 1959). not through (Hampshire philosophers is running perception nonsensical who saw as sense-datum in precluded observer is perceptual the involved an actor, of of an connections that and also idea agent not the believed is perceiving that who the Hampshire thinker concepts of a simply these motion, of concepts was of are agent, of a active which and network woven of a objects object tightly in material independently independent So embedded of of faculties. obtainable is time, world agent somehow and intentional a space voluntary, were in of a agent that of self-moving concept ideas Our a untenable. which and as oneself impressions ideas, of of and notion notion experimenting impressions Hume space-occupying are. the of self-willed, they on that the succession world of a the instead in observers as agents passive experience as persons understood rendered things. Hume, of material independence of of world logical that redolent a holds in in which given animals ideas, active are and as will impressions ourselves of and of in Hume succession accord- emotion, knowledge from a body philosophy, sense-perception, inheritance of and modern empiricist consists sensation, on mind experience an thought, conceptions our of of epistemological which marks Cartesian unity to the of ing the as shadow saw recognize long he the can what and that opposed He agency action. present human human ever of conception Souls. was All embodied I at fellowship which prize a at to Berlin elected recounted, Balliol and was later at he Austin Berlin Humaniores time joined Literae which read he at Repton, 1936 There, at in educated graduated was and Hampshire College, positivism onward. logical 1930s of late drive the reductivist the amidst voice esn o efkolde(aphr 92.Adh lbrtdteitrrtv iwo how subject of embodied view the interpretive the on elaborated also he depends And 1952). self-knowledge (Hampshire self-knowledge for persons beliefs our of action, in execution their and falsity intentions or our truth of their objects, and their and perceptions our hsclaec,adsuh ogv h oino nrseto n h osblt of possibility the and introspection of notion the give to and concepts sought mental and between connections interpretive agency, the these Clearly stressed physical 1959). repeatedly (Hampshire Hampshire environment Merleau-Ponty. physical Hampshire a of in features agent physical a being h nlg fFeeling of Analogy The aphr ogtt iauetecneta omtet flgclpstvs yarguing by positivism logical of commitments conceptual the disabuse to sought Hampshire mind, of philosophy the in wave empiricist new the way the opposed fervidly Hampshire ’ ‘ huh xii h in the exhibit thought s nrtopc hyse om h otfutu icsin fphilosophy of discussions fruitful most the me to seem they retrospect in – ’ aphr mhszdtencsiyo omncto ihother with communication of necessity the emphasized Hampshire , om uhsals e htqetoso nweg utb seen be must knowledge of questions that web a seamless such forms ’ Bri 93 ) aphr rudfra netoa and intentional an for argued Hampshire 9). 1973: (Berlin ’ ekymeiggopo hrdyatron,which afternoons, Thursday on group meeting weekly s ’ oino xeinewsichrn eas trelied it because incoherent was experience of notion s Idealism 51 fl ec fJa-alSrr swl sMaurice as well as Sartre Jean-Paul of uence fi di idadbd norconceptual our in body and mind in ed ’ iwo enn n nweg from knowledge and meaning of view s ’ es fisoniett n nits on and identity own its of sense s – oydsicin n naconcep- a on and distinction, body ’ ou wyfrom away focus s – of Downloaded By: 10.3.98.104 At: 17:44 26 Sep 2021; For: 9781315725314, chapter3, 10.4324/9781315725314.ch3 niiuls nepaiigteiprac n roiyo atclrtig,epcal of especially their things, is, of selfhood; and that particular identity of nominalism, of speci aspects historically social their priority and the uniqueness recognized in and the They subjects. liberal importance moral human as clearly the about people individual were knowledge interpretations. emphasizing acquiring persons, Hampshire for in further of and sense conception individualism on makes thick Berlin behaviour their relies Both human and of subjects. life and account human vitalist to of a understanding only reference cultural their makes to empiricism According necessarily new which the interpretation, of that understanding because idealist claim their explicitly with a do epistemo- as to between uni advanced have see are ones they political concerns connections and The such moral action. and human questions and logical beings human of conception Hampshire and Berlin philosophy in place intelligible an intentions own his 1959). of 1956, 1953a, speaker (Hampshire a by declarations incorrigible oiia hoy eas rwo ee n hnmnlg oudrtn h meanings the understand to phenomenology and and Hegel social for on ontologies in social drew holism of also meaning importance the on He to insisted voice theory. He inter- gave sciences. political and an of human language, for of the analyses from arguments philosophy for themes the his vitalist anti-naturalism idealist O to defended for the and and integral made edge, (Bevir Hampshire need Taylor science and and for freedom. the social Berlin known of selfhood pretive to self, well conception of Oakeshott is positive embedded Taylor and nature a Taylor. Collingwood socially as interpretive Charles well the and student, as their agency, behaviour, about of of writings arguments the nature supporting in vitalist echoed are and totalitarian identity embodied and despotic the disastrous of tion, the forms as other construed and be philosophy could deductive political what of and fear suspicious e moral to them made utilitarian and which monism, oppose life, ethical to human in them values led of abstractions, plurality the in belief utopian that concepts psychological of analyses behaviourist of rejection itnusigbtenhmnatosadmr vns ae nhster ffedmand freedom of theory his on on based insisted events, Hampshire di mere 1964). fundamental and Taylor actions the 1950; human (Hampshire between sciences distinguishing human the in anti-naturalism nlmnbehmnpwrof power human ineliminable aue n htalveso ua aueaehsoial odtoe n setal revisable. on essentially outlook and human his conditioned of in historically view out are a nature in borne grounded human further be of is must views that ethics all be of idea that the must system and of an comprehensible activities nature, view is any His human selfhood that do. that and namely to view ethics, identity sought and wider human psychology behaviourist his historical of as of vitality be abstractly application not must particular historically, one understood which just character, Hampshire is 1962). human dispositions 1953b, to from sciences (Hampshire applied distinct human objects disposition thus the in and a predictions genetical, of making of notion aim special Hampshire the 1958). troubles Hart thus with (Hampshire and situation, the changes ff csi oiiso tepigt nf n amnz ua values. human harmonize and unify to attempting of politics in ects vnbfr hre Taylor Charles before Even ssc,terepae ntesca ae fitninlato,teiprac frecogni- of importance the action, intentional of bases social the on emphases their such, As – iocdwa stu ie htcudb ail eue rmdsrt rmss from premises) discrete from deduced validly be could what (i.e. true is what divorced hre alr nepeainadtehmnsciences human the and interpretation Taylor: Charles ff rnebtendcso n rdcin i li a htteei an is there that was claim His prediction. and decision between erence fi ’ di ua xeine nmn asti daol eddt be to needed only idea this ways many In experience. human in ed ruet ndfneo nintrls aecertervitalist their clear make anti-naturalism of defence in arguments s ‘ ’ tnigback standing aosciiu fbhvors perdi a Hampshire was it appeared behaviourism of critique famous s ‘ ipstoa properties dispositional fi ’ re 03.H rudfra raiitve fknowl- of view organicist an for argued He 2003). Brien aueo atclrhmnpeoea n eda anti- an held and phenomena; human particular of nature c ’ nintrls eeoe hog i con fthe of account his through developed anti-naturalism s am Choi Naomi ’ rmaypeito fone of prediction any from 52 ’ mhsso h sconltclacutof account psychoanalytical the on emphasis s ’ pseooyta implicitly that epistemology s ’ htmyb osse ymaterial by possessed be may that fl se u la eec of defence clear a out eshed ’ uueatos which actions, future s – fnot if ’ s Downloaded By: 10.3.98.104 At: 17:44 26 Sep 2021; For: 9781315725314, chapter3, 10.4324/9781315725314.ch3 Tyo 95.H eue oeo i xodtahr o hi long-standing their for mid-1950s teachers the in Oxford Oxford his at of student some graduate rebuked a as He Taylor began 1965). societies. other tradition (Taylor or continental own their so-called in the action social to attach people nur bu h oiladpltclwrd eaiuait aeueo scienti of of mode use proper made the Behaviouralists constitute world. sciences political that natural and assumption the social the beha- in the embody of recognized which about ascendancy of categories inquiry gradual all and the theory, methods emulate witnessed choice to the particular, rational aspiring in sciences and human studies, structuralism, the viouralism, Political in trends sciences. sciences. of moral with natural natural century the the the twentieth intertwined neutralize the to in we human is ascendancy when the gradual be lost reduce agency to is cannot human try what the and precisely they how that agency is way that human thinks about of the he are nature in claims Taylor which bypassed we 45). morality, related be 1985: and what or (Taylor language multiple it demands of from involves objectivity separable constitutive achieve therefore or to so reality in goal on is science Heidegger, view natural a experiences from merely our particular as notion considered the and in phenomenological adopts Taylor ourselves century, a existence. when twentieth of on human to up assumptions late essential is picks the empiricist of interpretation also that in broadly view anti-naturalism widely the an maintains advancing His echoes of world. also favour that in natural reductivist but theme disciplines the humanistic knowledge and into the in of inquiring scientistic anti-naturalism view defends the Taylor interpretive latter. opposing the of by tones thinking, the of in counterenlightenment interest tendencies 1991). key (Taylor and a Humboldt share as enment to well comes as who he Herder, Ayer, whom as with J. such Berlin A. thinkers thanks and German especially other Hampshire, He Berlin, viii). teachers 1975: enterprise Oxford (Taylor the his on to quite his him philosopher to Taylor set preface the others. the in among In interest teachers. Merleau-Ponty, his other and his Heidegger, praised Husserl, explicitly Humboldt, von Hegel, solipsism asta prt ewe tmzduisadasmspeitv oe a eeaeexpert generate can power preferences predictive causal assumes individual demonstrate and to takes units parsimony, seeks it atomized It namely research. between research, while empirical operate conducting for theory, that and use laws choice instrumental judging and for Rational structure, individuals criteria of deductive actors. positivist beliefs the of the employs discovering of on seriously, meanings irrespective focus events, the realism determine critical or or and guide quanti that neo-Marxism of structures like unobservable use structuralism the of stressed Varieties ships. and collection data of pseooia usino o emgtaqiescienti acquire might be we to how can of sciences question natural epistemological the from world. categories human and the methods studying the in that replicated assumption the theory on choice operate rational of varieties and computer-in structuralism, Behaviouralism, advice. policy otene o nepeaini h td fhmn n oit.Ti rvnsthem prevents This self-interpretive, The society. beings. and human humans of show of features approaches study important such most hostility the the the in of is major interpretation The some sciences of. for grasping natural knowledge seek from need the we mimic the matter subject to to the attempts of with nature the problem of question ontological the i aos17 essay, 1971 famous His enlight- both of insights and virtues the mediate to tried Taylor Hampshire, and Berlin Like o alr oee,wotksAristotle takes who however, Taylor, For Dasein ’ hti,o ua ensa efitrrtn ens n lista u interpretation our that claims and beings, self-interpreting as beings human of is, that , n ogtt rn uhnee lrt n re and clarity needed much bring to sought and fl ecdtere fitliec n optrbsdmdl npsychology in models computer-based and intelligence of theories uenced fi s,btas shwn h eahscleoeiim n oaiainover- totalitarian and esotericisms metaphysical the eschewing also but rst, ‘ ‘ ayyasao oeta a eebro ol iet recall to like would or remember can I than more ago, years many nepeainadteSine fMan of Sciences the and Interpretation Idealism 53 ’ iwta ehddpnso atr the matter, on depends method that view s fi bevralst nls bevberelation- observable analyse to variables able fi fi nweg sietial ikdto linked inextricably is knowledge c s oko ee,Tyo attributes Taylor Hegel, on book rst fi eett h da fHerder, of ideas the to nement ’ epne rtclyt the to critically responded , ’ neeti hlspesin philosophers in interest s ’ anti-naturalism s fi techniques c – including ‘ cultural – all ’ Downloaded By: 10.3.98.104 At: 17:44 26 Sep 2021; For: 9781315725314, chapter3, 10.4324/9781315725314.ch3 mto sol hti srfatda nhmnlanguage and human in emotions, Taylor as refracted As feelings, is beings. it intentions, self-interpreting what only purposes, interpreting is are emotion with sciences and agents human matter things the says, are mischaracterizing whom of for they Students to subjects language. meaning; are beings lead have human action. because which their rather phenomena, only motivate social distorting, which and up and can human end hold, understand, interpretation sciences agents beyond that certainty meanings human absolute the reconstruct achieve conveying, to than to attempts the Empiricist as subject. so the in knowledge of nature the accuracy misunderstanding fundamentally inapplic- and clarity, representative knowledge measurable objectivity, absoluteness, of of model standards Employing and empiricist sciences. human the the renders to beings able human of nature strong-evaluative alrhv otne ouhl h daitnto fpstn epitra connection internal deep a since positing of Interpretivists di notion challenge. they idealist to but the practice, appraise open and uphold and from and language to result clarify, between incomplete they continued formulate, always because have to are that Taylor but acknowledging results against settle, ultimately is the hermeneutics practices, and aim interpretation, social hermeneutic systematize, defend and The Heidegger correlate, meanings to sciences. measure, of cultural human Taylor to the arguments in just for phenomenological approaches not resources the positivistic other and ample and Hegel behaviourism provided of Merleau-Ponty, arguments and ontological of the webs inchoate, as by or constituted tacit be so may as which hermeneutics. of meanings, practices depth independent these human a is of requires view that account discovered giving Interpretivists be that polity. meanings can socially intersubjective that principle of in of that dimension language and Taylor the exists intersubjective social that like the of reality political approaches mode seriously separate Interpretive proper takes the meanings. same but Thus constitutive principle the experience, polity. in share that personal could essentially that of subjective reality language out political the carried separate of scienti a is and of independently investigation sense idea discovered its any which be opposes acquires by Taylor turn context. tools in pervasive language the that deep and and a investigation only language, postulates not by are He constituted instance, wider others. signi for are the with practices, but against Political shared in practice. only practices expressed and intelligible language social between made of about. connection and wrong contexts internal are formed concrete shape they moreover, of is self-understandings are, background it Our meanings what articulation. deluded. shape These in can or actions. make wrong they clairvoyant, wrong it self-interpretations when adequate, getting that even and less so or right feel, or arbitrary, it we them. more are what getting of articulations a be or is accept the desire can There we to that Self-interpretations what mean come true. of not we sense and themselves our does articulations of desires, shapes this the activity actually motivations, But by articulation the certain constituted our a since are animals, Accepting or beings, self-understandings us, linguistic to our to linguistic given us As it, as merely enabling in not self-understandings. them plays are language express evaluations see that role and to constitutive the have also from inextricable is is self-interprets self-interpretation self-interpreting who as being a humans of that essentially ncnrs otentrlsine,adul emnui utb twr ntesuyof study the in work at be must hermeneutic double a sciences, natural the to contrast In h daittee htBri n aphr asaldaanttenweprcss swell as empiricists, new the against marshalled Hampshire and Berlin that themes idealist The their of understanding an from bracketed be cannot by live humans meanings the Taylor, For fi ‘ ac rmtepltclpatcsaon n hog hc tdvlp.Teojcsof objects The develops. it which through and around practices political the from cance htagvnhmnlf sa nepeaino anteituitrrtd o human for uninterpreted; exist cannot of interpretation an is life human given a what fi nur ete sue nojcientr osca elt o eue h ol to world the reduces nor reality social to nature objective an assumes neither inquiry c am Choi Naomi fi ff e rtsta edsoe.Rte,a alrsees Taylor as Rather, discover. we that truths xed ro xcl o od o oehv portrayed have Some so. do to how exactly on er ’ 54 Tyo 95 5.AdfrTyo,t de to Taylor, for And 75). 1985: (Taylor … ’ poeteie htteei a is there that idea the oppose s h efta st eitrrtdis interpreted be to is that self the fi dimportant. nd fi ne Downloaded By: 10.3.98.104 At: 17:44 26 Sep 2021; For: 9781315725314, chapter3, 10.4324/9781315725314.ch3 rvdsacnrt xml fsc nitrrtv omo xlnto ruddo an on grounded explanation of form interpretive an such of example concrete a provides identi of to outcome explanations them. reduced the require be They of to cannot attitudes. terms aggregate beliefs attributed isolated that in hol- with states hold form unpacked correlated practices agents intentional or be social of variables and the preferences intervening actions hold mere and of to constitutive beliefs fact are the that in that webs insight do istic o idealist actors without the actors, extending relevant human Interpretivists models of the deductive rationality that build the instance, about evidence for assumptions theorists, universal choice basic Rational on analyses. regression complex and He 1958). (Winch them for must explanations sciences su seek human is than the which insisted rather di example, study that the for they argued in Winch, objects giving explanation Peter the for like understand suited Relativists not but sciences. understanding, human for appropriate as theory interpretive cin.Mn oilsinit yasblesadpeeecsb orltn cin ihobjective di with actions be norms, correlating could or by people preferences preferences, they and about ideas, beliefs if facts wide beliefs, bypass scientists a with as social with concerned Many them issue be actions. treat extending to take claim therefore appropriately typically who Interpretivists and but scientists inquiry. necessarily social empirical of as by range supplied analysis data interpretive the their beyond see signi most the to measurements, of irreducible fundamentally self-consciousness. are systems by to which meanings life, or these complex political mind contingent uncover of of and and practices products of the depict discordant to that products the discourses seek into hold scripted interpretivists delving concepts. cultural These thus the practices. a our ontologies with within only co-extensive occupying anti-foundational all are meanings as by as they subjects inspired well relevant since understand methods as not Interpretive intentionality life discourses. should the subjective is control political practitioners of to dimensions of other seek realm evaluative and and nature mask their historians They value-laden rede 1986). of Moreover, and 1973, of elimination (Foucault contestability projects sinister and likelihood, modernist essential all measurement all in of Foucault, and hubris, For uniformity altogether. for reason concepts denounced and further in pretivists and to sociology pointing in by in Interpretivists causal, actions. also and not beliefs narrative, were between essentially links anthropology are volitional that and actions conditional the and intentions, desires, beliefs, scienti social cecscalne eaiuit n ainlcoc theorists of choice 12). webs rational Chapter and the (see behaviourists guesses understand challenged best to sciences from conclusions symbols explanatory its draws and and meanings discourse at for social guessing have the signi actions and particular interprets that meaning and Cultural meanings the experience. actors, recording of by social proceeds bases ethnographer ontological The the contexts. provide Cli di that like the reasoning anthropologists on practical and focuses knowledge Ethnography ethnography. and nitrrtv praht oenneavne yMr ei n .A .Rhodes W. A. R. and Bevir Mark by advanced governance to approach interpretive An lhuhitrrtvssd o,i rnil,rjc h s fsaitc n quantitative and statistics of use the reject principle, in not, do interpretivists Although of goals alternative as explanation and understanding casting reject interpretivists other Many l nepeieapoce htepaietecntuto fkoldei h human the in knowledge of construction the emphasize that approaches interpretive All – ffi fl cigo netoa ttste a luil esi ohold. to said be plausibly can they states intentional on acting fi in o vlaigisitra practices. internal its evaluating for cient ecdb otsrcuaitadps-oenpioohe npriua went particular in philosophies post-modern and post-structuralist by uenced nur.Te ru htw a ieepaain ftecneto between connection the of explanations give can we that argue They inquiry. c ff rn utrsadwy flf ahgnrtsisonsadrso rationality, of standards own its generates each life of ways and cultures erent fi – ac htoeaewti hs rcie.Teehorpe eeaie by generalizes ethnographer The practices. those within operate that cance ..alfrso ovrainlaayi,qaiaiesalncomparisons, small-n qualitative analysis, co-variational of forms all e.g. ff r erzcle for called Geertz ord fl ecdb hnmnlg hc aor eta approaches textual favours which phenomenology by uenced Idealism 55 ‘ hc descriptions thick fi ff bepltclactors political able rnitdfo n eae niiulyto individually related and from erentiated ff rn om feeya common-sense everyday of forms erent ’ list betvt.Btinter- But objectivity. to claims ’ ntesuyo te social other of study the in – hte niiulor individual whether ff rn adequate ering fi ainare cation fi ning Downloaded By: 10.3.98.104 At: 17:44 26 Sep 2021; For: 9781315725314, chapter3, 10.4324/9781315725314.ch3 oennepatcs hs utb tde o h nepa n ots ftemlil beliefs classi multiple the agents of the contest devel- and of interplay social meanings the of for can complex inexorability studied norm radically be and the or must practice, or thus, actually institution, institutions, practices, no Governance of that are fact dependence the practices path belie opments the social reasoning, scienti of how social ground nature to misrepresent too attempt that all sciences, explanations explanations, and political social a Causal in traditions lacking sociology. studied the contingent, contingent typically and is in of economy, governance terms political prevalent way in administration, the to public changes attention science, these critical brought of have unitary explanations dilemmas of narrative power of di Their locales increasingly centralized society. the the from 1970s, to the states since governance in have changes complexities standing narratives. international contested and and within regional contingent organizations increasing of to by functions out posed and arisen powers problems all state the to of and attach transfer to society authors the civil the us that content but urge governance, The ways of Rhodes dilemmas. the pattern to, exploring and respond by Bevir and re changed of, them, governance and conceive maintained, about individuals an produced, facts which o to are in read social opposition practices reliably in social objective cannot stands to how from idea we response understand new individuals Because in a reconsideration. occurs of when forces Change actions institution so actions. of or and or concept individual idea the beliefs an existing use their for They arise change arenas. that people many institution dilemmas in why modi or individuals explain and practice, of to tradition, actions sustained, dilemma and a created, some preferences, of is beliefs, study having it the decentred which as ving A in traditions it. way decentre see the to unpacks they have could do politics tradition of Nor a students in do. principles or the say whereby development adherents of its any logic their lacking all internal through and in contingent, traditions as present produce regarded necessarily people are traditions Because agents, tradition. as relevant actions that the discourses transform or might languages, which epistemes, as con- truth, not the subjects subjectivity, structures, use of They social 1999). rejection understand fi (Bevir wholesale to post-modernism tradition the and of eschew reason post-structuralism own cept they interpretive marks their time, of that to according same reason strands solely and the against act At and autonomy, think commands. without who and even subjects autonomous agency assume of that theory possibility meaningful the a defend as or They recreated modi discourses, and and traditions, created traditions of is by form governance informed the how beliefs in illustrate through beliefs they practice aggregated doing, practitioners other so In instruct to ideologies. beliefs They their beliefs. relating o their by politicians, interpretive They tices and of an 1). meanings with agents individual Chapter it the through and interpret contrasting understood 2003; to by networks al. networks et as to governance Bevir approach of 2003; account Rhodes positivist and the (Bevir challenge action of view intentionalist xlnto ydpoigtecnet ftaiinaddlma hog hc gnscreate, agents which constitute. through they dilemma, practices and the tradition alter of and concepts sustain, the deploying by explanation rlmta gn,a ocuda tde o u sta hc rvdstebcgon to background the provides which that as but do, studies Foucauldian as agent, an limit or x ei n hdsi atclrcetvl dpe daittee osekdrcl ounder- to directly speak to themes idealist adapted creatively particular in Rhodes and Bevir tradition, a of nature and content the understand to order in that argue authors These Rhodes and Bevir ’ eif,sen gnsa bet eetpriua eif n cin,icuignvlones, novel including actions, and beliefs particular select to able as agents seeing beliefs, fl csteritrrtv prah hyageta hr sn eesr rgiven or necessary no is there that argue They approach. interpretive their ects ’ fi iwo nepeainle ewe emnuisadpost-structuralism. and hermeneutics between lies interpretation of view e sec rlgclpt fdvlpet codn oteeauthors, these to According development. of path logical or essence xed ff rnitdaryo ewrsars onaiso tt n civil and state of boundaries across networks of array erentiated am Choi Naomi fi dwti hm uhnraiesoisprovide stories narrative Such them. within ed 56 fi eerhi paetygvnfcsaotthe about facts given apparently in research c ffi il,ctzn,adpriiat fsca prac- social of participants and citizens, cials, fi di epnet dilemmas. to response in ed fi dtruhlclraoiginvol- reasoning local through ed fi o t atcpnswl act. will participants its how x fi e seta atta is that part essential xed fi hi w use. own their x ff h eif and beliefs the Downloaded By: 10.3.98.104 At: 17:44 26 Sep 2021; For: 9781315725314, chapter3, 10.4324/9781315725314.ch3 aphr,S (1956) S. Hampshire, (1953b) S. Hampshire, (1953a) S. Hampshire, (1952) S. Hampshire, ic,P (1958) P. Winch, (1985) C. Taylor, (1975) C. Taylor, (1959) S. Hampshire, aphr,S (1950) S. Hampshire, (1986) M. Foucault, (1973) M. Foucault, (1978) I. Berlin, (1973) I. Berlin, (1936) J. A. Ayer, nue vntog thdt ervsdadrivne gis h e miiitchallenges. empiricist new philosophy (1931 the Taylor idealist against Charles reinvented of how phenomenology and and anti-naturalism of revised of be evidence defence the to further through had Moreover, counterparts, it though their even against of freedom endured of characteristic conception positive a a atomism and on behaviour insisted the both of They analysis positivism. against vitalist person a of ception of importance the asserted Hampshire reduction. ie,D,J omn n .Sutra es (1991) (eds) Shusterman R. and Bohman, (1958) Hart J. A. D., L. Hiley, H. with S. Hampshire, (1962) S. Hampshire, alr .(1991) C. Taylor, (1971) B. Magee, ei,M,R .W hds n .Wle es (2003) (eds) Weller P. and Rhodes, W. A. (2003) Rhodes R. W. M., A. Bevir, R. and M. Bevir, O D. and M. Bevir, (1999) M. Bevir, (2002) I. Berlin, (2000) I. Berlin, eni h la xml fteitrrtv tde fgvrac fBvradRhodes. be and can Bevir as of century, governance of twentieth studies the interpretive of the half of social latter example post-positivist the clear of in the development in theory the seen in political echoes post-analytic strong and have science to continue themes idealist these of importance contemporaries the advanced positivist political Berlin in Taylor. his hold like took against thinkers they through interpretation and analysis Hampshire, idealism of historical and wake of Berlin the overhaul like in complete thinkers studies near through the persist execute, to to managed seemed and philosophy for, within called empiricists new the alr .(1965) C. Taylor, (1964) C. Taylor, (1944) L. C. Stevenson, tion xod lrno Press. Clarendon Oxford: taa Y onl nvriyPress. University Cornell NY: Ithaca, Press. pca su of issue Special Macmurray John Giroux. and Straus Farrar York: New Hausheer. Press. University ncnlso,wt h ieo oiiimtruhu the throughout positivism of rise the with conclusion, In odn oat rs,19,p.40 pp. 1991, Press, Hogarth London: . ocpsadCtgre:PioohclEssays Philosophical Categories: and Concepts Liberty h rprSuyo akn:A nhlg fEssays of Anthology An Mankind: of Study Proper The ‘ ‘ utnadteEryBgnig fOfr Philosophy Oxford of Beginnings Early the and Austin hlspia Papers Philosophical h dao oilSineadIsRlto oPhilosophy to Relation Its and Science Social a of Idea The ocut oe,adInstitutions and Power, Foucault, oenBiihPhilosophy British Modern ulcAdministration Public Hegel ‘ Behaviour of Explanation ‘ agae rt,adLogic and Truth, Language, eiwo Merleau-Ponty of Review h motneo Herder of Importance The ’ . ’ ’ ak.Yt h daittee fOksotadCligodnevertheless Collingwood and Oakeshott of themes idealist the Yet, ranks. s h re fTig:A rhelg fteHmnSciences Human the of Perception Archaeology Medical An of Things: Archaeology of An Order Clinic: The the of Birth The re (2003) Brien itr fPltclThought Political of History ‘ ‘ huh n Action and Thought ‘ ‘ h nlg fFeeling of Analogy The nRfrigadIntending and Referring On rtclNtc fRyle of Notice Critical ipsto n Memory and Disposition ‘ dtdb er ad.Ofr:Ofr nvriyPress. University Oxford Oxford: Hardy. Henry by edited , ‘ abig:CmrdeUiest rs,p viii. p. Press, University Cambridge Cambridge: . efKoldeadteWill the and Self-Knowledge Dispositions tisadLanguage and Ethics ‘ rmIels oCmuiains:TeIhrtneadLgc of Legacy and Inheritance The Communitarianism: to Idealism From ,Vol.1, ’ . Analysis 1(1). 81 odn htoadWindus. and Chatto London: . nepeigBiihGovernance British Interpreting mes,N:Poehu Books. Prometheus NY: Amherst, . ‘ odn ekradWarburg. and Secker London: . Bibliography eiin neto n Certainty and Intention Decision, e ae,C:Yl nvriyPress. University Yale CT: Haven, New . ua gnyadLanguage and Agency Human odn Dover. London: . – ’ ’ nE agltadA aglt(eds), Margalit A. and Margalit E. in , 63. ’ s 4 5 14: ’ ocp fMind of Concept s . 4() 305 (2): 24 ’ h tutr fBehaviour of Structure The . Idealism ora fMind of Journal nentoa ora fPsychoanalysis of Journal International ’ – ’ 57 . . 11. ’ hlspia Review Philosophical oiia Studies Political . eu nentoaed philosophie de internationale Revue dtdb er ad.Pictn J Princeton NJ: Princeton, Hardy. Henry by edited , h nepeieTr:Piooh,Sine Culture Science, Philosophy, Turn: Interpretive The – 29. rdtoso oenne itr n Diversity and History Governance: of Traditions 1 1 61: ’ . fi Mind 7 345 47: dtdb er ad n Roger and Hardy Henry by edited , ’ odn Routledge. London: . – s afo h wnit century, twentieth the of half rst 12. abig:CmrdeUniversity Cambridge Cambridge: , ocr ihveri with concern odn Routledge. London: . ’ , 5 1 65: 9 237 59: e Statesman New ’ nhis in , – ’ . odn Routledge. London: . 59. odn Tavistock. London: . – Mind 13. – sihBri:ACelebra- A Berlin: Isaiah 55. saso .L Austin L. J. on Essays 7 1 67: 3 59 43: 2) 230 (25): 7 70. – 12. – fi 68. ‘ ainand cation thick – ’ 45. con- – ) . . .