DOCSLIB.ORG

Notes and References

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Notes and References Notes and References Chapter 1 1. Saint -Simon refers to posItive philosophy, negative principles and positive work at least as early as his Introduction aux travaux scientifiques du xixe siecle, 2 vols, 1807-8; see pp. 97 and 103 of the extracts translated by the editor in K. Taylor (1975). 2. An exception is Halfpenny (1982). See also Cohen (1980). There are well-considered, if undifferentiated, accounts of positivism in the 'Introduction' to Giddens (ed.) (1974); and in Keat & Urry (1975) and Benton (1977). 3. Habermas (1963-71) ch. 7. This chapter was first published in German in 1963. 4. It is particularly regrettable that limitations of space preclude discussion of positivism in the Marxist tradition. For a start on this topic, see Jordan (1967) and Wellmer (1969). Chapter 2 1. E. Durkheim, The Rules of Sociological Method (French edn, 1895; English edn, 1982) passim. This English edition by S. Lukes, translated by W. D. Hills, provides a superior translation to the 1938 edition by G. E. G. Catlin, translated by S. A. Solovay & J. H. Mueller. As the 1938 edition is so well known, however, comparative page references to it will be given. 2. There is no complete translation of the Cours. I always quote from H. Martineau (ed.), The Positive Philosophy of August Comte, 2 vols (1853). Martineau 'freely translated and condensed' the original and there can be no doubt that M. Clarke's translation for S. Andreski (ed.), The Essential Comte (1974) is superior. Unfortunately, it does not include all the passages I wish to quote and so, rather than confuse by using two translations of the same work, I have always gone back to Martineau. Where possible I also give a cross reference to Andreski. This quotation, for example, is from vol. 2, p. 97; cf. p. 180. Comte, incidentally, approved of Martineau's condensation and had it retranslated into French. The condensation is mainly of Comte's exposition of the natural sciences, and comparison of Martineau's and Clarke's translations of passages quoted here reveals no significant differences of sense. It is also worth noting that Comte wrote to J. S. Mill that 'all the principal conceptions' of the Positive Philosophy are 184 Notes and References to be found in A Discourse on the Positive Spirit (French edn, 1844); see p. iv of E. S. Beesly's Translator's Preface' to the English edn (1903). 3. Marcuse has contrasted Comte and Hegel on this question. See Marcuse (1941, rev. 1954) pt. II, ch. II. 4. The collections of Saint-Simon's writing edited by Markham (1952) and Taylor (1975) have interesting introductions. In addition, see Manuel (1956), and (1962) chs 3 and 4. Durkheim (1895-6) is a classic; and Kumar (1978) ch. 1, is a good recent discussion. 5. Saint-Simon's political parable appeared in L'Organisateur (1819). It is translated in both Markham (1952) pp. 72-5, and Taylor (1975) pp. 194-7. As early as 1802-3, in his Letters from an Inhabitant of Geneva to his Contemporaries, Saint-Simon had presented a 'dream' in which 'All men will work' (Taylor, 1975, p. 80). 6. There is an extract from Saint-Simon's 'Sketch of the New Political System', published in L'Organisateur (1819), in Taylor (1975) pp. 198-206. 7. See Durkheim (1895-6) ch. 11, and Manuel (1956; 1962). Bazard, Enfantin and others formalised Saint-Simonian teaching in a series of public lectures in 1828-9 entitled The Doctrine of Saint-Simon: an Exposition; First Year, 1828-1829. Also, see Lichtheim (1968) ch. 3. 8. Durkheim (1895-6) ch. 6. On Comte, also see Aron (1967) vol. 1, pt. 2; Manuel (1962) ch. 6; the editors' introductions to Andreski (1974) and Thompson (1976); and Evans-Pritchard (1970). 9. Comte's 'Plan of the Scientific Operations Necessary for Reorganizing Society' was first published in 1822, and then republished in 1824 with the additional title of 'System of Positive Polity'. For the row over publication, see Manuel (1962) pp. 251-60. 10. On the positivist movement, see Simon (1963) and Charlton (1959; 1963). 11. There is an enormous literature of Durkheim - some of it of very high quality. Lukes (1973) is without doubt the premier commentary, but LaCapra (1972) and Wallwork (1972) are also recommended. Giddens (1978) and Tiryakin (1978) offer excellent introductions. 12. It should always be borne in mind that the text of the lectures has been reconstructed from students' notes. 13. There is an intriguing point of contrast with Spencer here. Spencer argued that each cause has a multiplicity of effects and each effect a multiplicity of causes (cf. Abrams, 1968, pp. 6~76). As a consequence it is futile to try to anticipate the consequences of even the best planned concerted action because even the simplest act will produce more unanticipated than intended results. Spencer's minimisation of the practical value of social science for positive public or concerted action could not have been congenial to Durkheim, but one can only speculate whether rebuttal of Spencer was one of the factors which moved Durkheim to insist that every effect has but a single cause. 14. The dispute in the German speaking world between the historical Notes and References 185 economists, especially Schmoller, and the neo-classical economists, led by Menger, is discussed in Ch. 3, pp. 58-64. It came to a head in 1883. Durkheim spent the 1885-6 academic year in Germany. See Durkheim (1887). 15. For an excellent discussion of the connections between Durkheim's sociology and political issues, see Giddens (1971). 16. See Gouldner's 'Introduction' to the English edn of Durkheim (1895-6), and Durkheim (1898-1900; 1902). 17. The Vienna Circle is discussed in Ch. 4, pp. 109-16. Something of its influence in America is mentioned in Ch. 5, pp. 139-45. Chapter 3 1. On the economists' Methodenstreit, see Schum peter (1954) pt 4, chs 2 and 4; Bi:ihm-Bawerk (1890a and b); and Gide & Rist (1909). It should be remembered that Bi:ihm-Bawerk was a pupil of Menger and that Schumpeter was also a product of the Austrian school; Gide and Rist are more sympathetic to the historical school (as was their compatriot, Durkheim, which they themselves note). 2. On the Verein, also see Mayer (1944) esp. ch. 2. and the references below in n. 16, p. 186. 3. Geisteswissenschaften is notoriously difficult to translate. It originated in the German translation (1863) of 'moral sciences' in Mill (1843). As Geist, i.e. mind or spirit, is peculiarly a human faculty I prefer 'human sciences'. I never use 'cultural sciences' because that is better reserved for Kulturwissenschaften, a term deliberately adopted by Rickert in distinction from Geisteswissenschaften. 4. Students with no knowledge of German might like to note the following. German writers in the hermeneutic tradition often use the verb verstehen and its derivatives. English language commentators on these writers sometimes leave these words in German. This makes both the words and their referents seem quite unnecessarily mysterious. The German for 'to understand' is verstehen: the infinitive can also be used as a verbal noun - thus Verstehen (all nouns in German are capitalised) means 'understanding'; similarly the present participle can also be used as a verbal adjective - thus verstehende Soziologie literally means 'understanding sociology', but is less awkwardly translated as 'interpretative (or in the, for once, more elegant American, 'interpretive') sociology'. This does raise the problem, however, of the difference, if any, in Weber and others, between verstehende Soziologie and deutende Soziologie; deuten means 'to interpret' or 'to construe'. The problem is discussed below, p.85. 5. On Dilthey, see Platinga, (1980); and Rickman (1979). 6. The term Wirklichkeitswissenschaft is first used in Simmel (1892). 7. Weber, of course, used early editions of Die Grenzen, not late editions of Geschichte und Naturwissenschaft. I have therefore paid 186 Notes and References close attention to two commentators who discuss Weber in relation to Die Grenzen. See Bruun (1972) esp. ch. 2; and Burger (1976) esp. pt. 1. 8. In addition to Bruun (1972) and Burger (1976), Cahnman (1964) and Goodman (1975) are helpful on the provenance of Weber's methodology. 9. Weber, Economy and Society (1922) vol. I, p. 4. Part I was (re)drafted for publication by Weber himself between 1918 and 1920; part II was written between 1910 and 1918 but Weber still had not revised it (except for the chapter on bureaucracy) at the time of his death in 1920. The first German edition, Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft (1922), was quickly super­ seded by the revised second edition (1925) edited by Marianne Weber and used by many translators (including Parsons). The fourth, revised, edition (1956) was edited by J. Winckelmann and is the basis of the English edition; a fifth , revised, edition was published by the same editor and firm in 1976. The first complete translation (3 vols, 1968), was edited by G. Roth and C. Wittich and introduced by G. Roth. It is made up of earlier partial translations, corrected and revised where necessary in relation to the fourth German edition. The 1978 publication used here is a two-volume corrected reissue. 10. Compare Weber, ' "Objectivity" in Social Science and Social Policy' (1904) ch. 2. The first part of this essay was agreed with E. Jaffe and W. Sombart; the second was Weber's responsibility alone. It appeared in the first number of the Archiv fur Sozialwissenschaften und Sozialpolitik to follow the takeover of the editorship by the three men. 11. See Oberschall (1965) pp. 94-9, on Levinstein. For the Verein survey, see Weber (1908); Oberschall (1965) ch.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Political and Social Philosophy of Auguste Comte
    THE POLITICAL AND SOCIAL PHILOSOPHY OF AUGUSTE COMTE. BY HARRY ELMER BARNES. I. LIFE AND WORKS. IT was one hundred years in May of this year since Auguste Comte pubHshed the famous prospectus of his comprehensive social philosophy under the title of Plan dcs travaux scientifiques ncccssaires pour reorganiser la societe} In the century which has passed many one-sided philosophies of society have been proposed and many incomplete schemes of social reform propounded. Many writers in recent years have, however, tended to revert to the position of Comte that we must have a philosophy of society which includes a consideration of biological, psychological and historical factors, and a program of social reform which will provide for an increase both in technical efficiency and in social morale.- Further, there has also developed a wide-spread distrust of the "pure" democracy of the last century and a growing feeling that we must endeavor more and more to install in positions of political and social power that intellectual aristocracy in which Comte placed his faith as the desirable leaders in the reconstruction of European society.'' In the light of the above facts a brief analysis of the political and social philosophy of Comte may have practical as well as historical interest to students of philosophy and social science. Auguste Comte ws born in MontpelHer in 1798, and received his higher education at the Ecole Polytcchnique. During six years 1 See the brief article on this matter in the American Journal of Sociology, January, 1922, pp. 510-13. - See Publications of the American Sociological Society, 1920, pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Martin Loughlin Political Jurisprudence
    Martin Loughlin Political jurisprudence Article (Accepted version) (Refereed) Original citation: Loughlin, Martin (2016) Political jurisprudence. Jus Politicum: Revue de Droit Politique, 16 . ISSN 2101-8790 © 2016 Revue internationale de droit politique This version available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/67311/ Available in LSE Research Online: August 2016 LSE has developed LSE Research Online so that users may access research output of the School. Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Users may download and/or print one copy of any article(s) in LSE Research Online to facilitate their private study or for non-commercial research. You may not engage in further distribution of the material or use it for any profit-making activities or any commercial gain. You may freely distribute the URL (http://eprints.lse.ac.uk) of the LSE Research Online website. This document is the author’s final accepted version of the journal article. There may be differences between this version and the published version. You are advised to consult the publisher’s version if you wish to cite from it. POLITICAL JURISPRUDENCE MARTIN LOUGHLIN I: INTRODUCTION Political jurisprudence is a discipline that explains the way in which governmental authority is constituted. It flourished within European thought in the period between the sixteenth and nineteenth centuries and since the twentieth century has been in decline. That decline, attributable mainly to an extending rationalization of life and thought, has led to governmental authority increasingly being expressed in technical terms. And because many of the implications of this development have been masked by the growth of an academic disciplinary specialization that sacrifices breadth of understanding for depth of knowledge, sustaining the discipline has proved difficult.
    [Show full text]
  • The Idea of Mimesis: Semblance, Play, and Critique in the Works of Walter Benjamin and Theodor W
    DePaul University Via Sapientiae College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences Theses and Dissertations College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences 8-2012 The idea of mimesis: Semblance, play, and critique in the works of Walter Benjamin and Theodor W. Adorno Joseph Weiss DePaul University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/etd Recommended Citation Weiss, Joseph, "The idea of mimesis: Semblance, play, and critique in the works of Walter Benjamin and Theodor W. Adorno" (2012). College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences Theses and Dissertations. 125. https://via.library.depaul.edu/etd/125 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences at Via Sapientiae. It has been accepted for inclusion in College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Via Sapientiae. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Idea of Mimesis: Semblance, Play, and Critique in the Works of Walter Benjamin and Theodor W. Adorno A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy October, 2011 By Joseph Weiss Department of Philosophy College of Liberal Arts and Sciences DePaul University Chicago, Illinois 2 ABSTRACT Joseph Weiss Title: The Idea of Mimesis: Semblance, Play and Critique in the Works of Walter Benjamin and Theodor W. Adorno Critical Theory demands that its forms of critique express resistance to the socially necessary illusions of a given historical period. Yet theorists have seldom discussed just how much it is the case that, for Walter Benjamin and Theodor W.
    [Show full text]
  • Auguste Comte and Positivism 1 a Free Download From
    Auguste Comte and Positivism 1 A free download from http://manybooks.net PART I. PART II. Auguste Comte and Positivism Project Gutenberg's Auguste Comte and Positivism, by John-Stuart Mill This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.net Title: Auguste Comte and Positivism Author: John-Stuart Mill Release Date: October 9, 2005 [EBook #16833] PART I. 2 Language: English Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1 *** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK AUGUSTE COMTE AND POSITIVISM *** Produced by Marc D'Hooghe AUGUSTE COMTE AND POSITIVISM BY JOHN STUART MILL 1865. * * * * * PART I. THE COURS DE PHILOSOPHIE POSITIVE. For some time much has been said, in England and on the Continent, concerning "Positivism" and "the Positive Philosophy." Those phrases, which during the life of the eminent thinker who introduced them had made their way into no writings or discussions but those of his very few direct disciples, have emerged from the depths and manifested themselves on the surface of the philosophy of the age. It is not very widely known what they represent, but it is understood that they represent something. They are symbols of a recognised mode of thought, and one of sufficient importance to induce almost all who now discuss the great problems of philosophy, or survey from any elevated point of view the opinions of the age, to take what is termed the Positivist view of things into serious consideration, and PART I.
    [Show full text]
  • Verstehen for Sociology: Comment on Watts
    Verstehen for Sociology: Comment on Watts The MIT Faculty has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters. Citation Turco, Catherine J. and Zuckerman, Ezra W. “Verstehen for Sociology: Comment on Watts.” American Journal of Sociology 122, 4 (January 2017): 1272–1291 © 2017 University of Chicago As Published http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/690762 Publisher University of Chicago Press Version Final published version Citable link http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/113217 Terms of Use Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use. Commentary and Debate To conserve space for the publication of original contributions to schol- arship, the comments in this section must be limited to brief critiques; au- thor replies must be concise as well. Comments are expected to address specific substantive errors or flaws in articles published in AJS. They are subject to editorial board approval and peer review. Only succinct and substantive commentary will be considered; longer or less focused papers should be submitted as articles in their own right. AJS does not publish rebuttals to author replies. VERSTEHEN FOR SOCIOLOGY: COMMENT ON WATTS1 INTRODUCTION Duncan Watts, in “Common Sense and Sociological Explanations” (AJS 120 [2014]: 313–51) has done our field a great service by raising a question at the heart of the sociological enterprise: What makes for valuable sociology, and when does it improve upon commonsense explanations? Watts makes three key observations that we believe are quite productive to contemplate.
    [Show full text]
  • Auguste Comte
    Module-2 AUGUSTE COMTE (1798-1857) Developed by: Dr. Subrata Chatterjee Associate Professor of Sociology Khejuri College P.O- Baratala, Purba Medinipur West Bengal, India AUGUSTE COMTE (1798-1857) Isidore-Auguste-Marie-François-Xavier Comte is regarded as the founders of Sociology. Comte’s father parents were strongly royalist and deeply sincere Roman Catholics. But their sympathies were at odds with the republicanism and skepticism that swept through France in the aftermath of the French Revolution. Comte resolved these conflicts at an early age by rejecting Roman Catholicism and royalism alike. Later on he was influenced by several important French political philosophers of the 18th century—such as Montesquieu, the Marquis de Condorcet, A.-R.-J. Turgot, and Joseph de Maistre. Comte’s most important acquaintance in Paris was Henri de Saint-Simon, a French social reformer and one of the founders of socialism, who was the first to clearly see the importance of economic organization in modern society. The major works of Auguste Comte are as follows: 1. The Course on Positive Philosophy (1830-1842) 2. Discourse on the Positive Sprit (1844) 3. A General View of Positivism (1848) 4. Religion of Humanity (1856) Theory of Positivism As a philosophical ideology and movement positivism first assumed its distinctive features in the work of the French philosopher Auguste Comte, who named the systematized science of sociology. It then developed through several stages known by various names, such as Empiriocriticism, Logical Positivism and Logical Empiricism and finally in the mid-20th century flowed into the movement known as Analytic and Linguistic philosophy.
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER the Sociological Perspective
    1CHAPTER The Sociological Perspective SYNOPSIS What Is Sociology? • The Sociological Imagination • Sociology and Popular Wisdom • Sociology and the Other Social Sciences The Development of Sociology • Auguste Comte • Herbert Spencer • Karl Marx • Emile Durkheim • Max Weber • Harriet Martineau The Development of Sociology in America The Major Theoretical Perspectives in Sociology • Structural Functional Theory • Confl ict Theory • Symbolic Interaction Theory • Exchange Theory • Evolutionary Theory • Additional Theoretical Perspectives and the Future of Sociological Theory 1.1 WHAT IS SOCIOLOGY? What is sociology ? Sociology is the scientifi c study of human behavior, social groups, and society. Sociology is concerned with every aspect of the self in relationships with others and every aspect of the social world that affects a person’s thoughts or actions. As stated by the American Sociological Association in a booklet titled 21st Century Careers with an Undergraduate Degree in Sociology (2009), sociology is the study of social life and the social causes and consequences of human behavior. The term social life encom- passes all interpersonal relationships, all groups or collections of persons, and all types of Sociology social organizations. The “causes and consequences of human behavior” encompass how The study of human society and social life and the social these relationships, groups, and organizations are interrelated; how they infl uence per- causes and consequences of sonal and interpersonal behavior; how they affect and are affected by the larger society; human behavior 3 4 Chapter 1 Focal Point THE SOCIOLOGY OF RAMPAGE SHOOTING Mass killings seem to be occurring more often now than in the against gun control, as means of curtailing violence, result.
    [Show full text]
  • Wilhelm Dilthey's Doctrine of World Views and Its Relationship to Hermeneutics
    David Naugle Philosophy 5329/501 Hermeneutics Spring 1993 University of Texas at Arlington Dr. Charles Nussbaum WILHELM DILTHEY'S DOCTRINE OF WORLD VIEWS AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO HERMENEUTICS INTRODUCTION Wilhelm Dilthey (1833-1911), whom José Ortega y Gasset called "the most im- portant philosopher in the second half of the nineteenth century"1 (1946: 131), was a man of passion, vision, and calling. The great crises of his age gripped his soul and propelled him on an intellectual and spiritual journey in quest of solutions to the prob- lems of Western culture at his moment in history. Here is his own personal testimony to the single-minded objective of his life. The great crisis of the sciences and European culture which we are now living through has so deeply and totally taken possession of my spirit that the desire to be of some help in it has extinguished every extraneous and personal ambition (JD vii; in Ermath 1978: 15). This crisis of modernity, of mammoth proportions to Dilthey who described it as "a shaking of human society and its foundations such as has not been seen since the declining days of the Greco-Roman world" (GS 6: 246), could be called a Streit der Weltanschauung—a clash, or "protracted crisis of consciousness or 'world view'" (Ermath 1978: 15). Dilthey lived through "the Hegelsstreit, Religionsstreit, Materialis 1 This is no small compliment when we realize that the competitors for this distinction include J. S. Mill, C. Darwin, H. Spencer, H. Bergson, K. Marx, F. Engels, J. Royce, F. Bradley, A. N.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Interdisciplinary History of Ideas, 16 | 2019 [Online], Online Since 31 December 2019, Connection on 30 July 2020
    Journal of Interdisciplinary History of Ideas 16 | 2019 Varia Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/jihi/276 ISSN: 2280-8574 Publisher GISI – UniTo Electronic reference Journal of Interdisciplinary History of Ideas, 16 | 2019 [Online], Online since 31 December 2019, connection on 30 July 2020. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/jihi/276 This text was automatically generated on 30 July 2020. Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International Public License 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Éditorial Manuela Albertone and Enrico Pasini Articles Rendering Sociology. On the Utopian Positivism of Harriet Martineau and the ‘Mumbo Jumbo Club’ Matthew Wilson Individualism and Social Change An Unexpected Theoretical Dilemma in Marxian Analysis Vitantonio Gioia Notes Introduction to the Open Peer-Reviewed Section on DR2 Methodology Examples Guido Bonino, Paolo Tripodi and Enrico Pasini Exploring Knowledge Dynamics in the Humanities Two Science Mapping Experiments Eugenio Petrovich and Emiliano Tolusso Reading Wittgenstein Between the Texts Marco Santoro, Massimo Airoldi and Emanuela Riviera Two Quantitative Researches in the History of Philosophy Some Down-to-Earth and Haphazard Methodological Reflections Guido Bonino, Paolo Maffezioli and Paolo Tripodi Book Reviews Becoming a New Self: Practices of Belief in Early Modern Catholicism, Moshe Sluhovsky Lucia Delaini Journal of Interdisciplinary History of Ideas, 16 | 2019 2 Éditorial Manuela Albertone et Enrico Pasini 1 Le numéro qu’on va présenter à nos lecteurs donne deux expressions d’une histoire interdisciplinaire des idées, qui touche d’une façon différente à la dimension sociologique. Une nouvelle attention au jeune Marx est axée sur le rapport entre la formation de l’individualisme et le contexte historique, que l’orthodoxie marxiste a négligé, faute d’une connaissance directe des écrits de la période de la jeunesse du philosophe allemand.
    [Show full text]
  • Sociology and Demography 1
    Sociology and Demography 1 4. Sufficient undergraduate training to do graduate work in the given Sociology and field. Demography Applicants Who Already Hold a Graduate Degree The Graduate Council views academic degrees not as vocational training The Graduate Group in Sociology and Demography (GGSD) is an certificates, but as evidence of broad training in research methods, interdisciplinary training program in the social sciences designed independent study, and articulation of learning. Therefore, applicants who for students with broad intellectual interests. Drawing on Berkeley's already have academic graduate degrees should be able to pursue new Department of Sociology and Department of Demography, the group subject matter at an advanced level without the need to enroll in a related offers students a rigorous and rewarding intellectual experience. or similar graduate program. The group, founded in 2001, sponsors a single degree program leading Programs may consider students for an additional academic master’s or to a PhD in Sociology and Demography. The GGSD helps foster an professional master’s degree only if the additional degree is in a distinctly active intellectual exchange between graduate students and faculty in different field. the two disciplines. In addition, faculty and students associated with the Applicants admitted to a doctoral program that requires a master’s degree group often maintain close ties with other disciplines both inside and to be earned at Berkeley as a prerequisite (even though the applicant outside the social sciences (for example, economics, anthropology, already has a master’s degree from another institution in the same or statistics, public health, biology, and medicine).
    [Show full text]
  • Suspicious Brothers: Reflections on Political History and Social Sciences
    Il Mulino - Rivisteweb Stefano Cavazza Suspicious Brothers: Reflections on Political His- tory and Social Sciences (doi: 10.1412/87619) Ricerche di storia politica (ISSN 1120-9526) Fascicolo speciale, ottobre 2017 Ente di afferenza: () Copyright c by Societ`aeditrice il Mulino, Bologna. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Per altre informazioni si veda https://www.rivisteweb.it Licenza d’uso L’articolo `emesso a disposizione dell’utente in licenza per uso esclusivamente privato e personale, senza scopo di lucro e senza fini direttamente o indirettamente commerciali. Salvo quanto espressamente previsto dalla licenza d’uso Rivisteweb, `efatto divieto di riprodurre, trasmettere, distribuire o altrimenti utilizzare l’articolo, per qualsiasi scopo o fine. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Political History Today Stefano Cavazza Suspicious Brothers: Reflections on Political History and Social Sciences Abstract This article analyses the relationship between history and the social sciences. Histo- rians and social scientists were long regarded as separate or even opposite in their methodological and analytical approaches. The opening of the historians’ ranks to- wards the social sciences became strongly apparent between the two world wars when the group of historians associated with the journal «Les Annales» set out to replace the «traditionally oriented narrative of events» by a «problem-oriented analytical his- tory». The 1980s were also the time when the «linguistic turn» spread to the historical studies, paving the way for cooperation with other subjects, but also complicating relations with some sectors of the social sciences. Social and political phenomena have a historical dimension which needs to be reckoned with. Collaboration presupposes recognising the respective scientific premises, and not falling into methodological monism.
    [Show full text]
  • The Science, Philosophy, and Politics of Auguste Comte
    Introduction The Significance of Auguste Comte Warren Schmaus, Mary Pickering, and Michel Bourdeau Despite Comte’s remarkable influence, there has been very little published in recent years on his thought, especially in English. Perhaps the best gen- eral overview in English of Comte’s entire philosophy is still the 1903 translation of Lucien Lévy-Bruhl’s The Philosophy of Auguste Comte. The present anthology aims to help correct this oversight. Such a volume is par- ticularly timely given the recent political turn in the philosophy of science. Philosophers of science such as Philip Kitcher and especially feminist philosophers of science such as Helen Longino have recently turned to questions of how science should be organized to better serve human needs. Kitcher envisions an enlightened public playing a larger role in science policy making, while Longino would like to democratize not just science policy but scientific decision making itself, permitting more different points of view to be expressed.1 At the same time, recent scholarship in the history of philosophy of science by Don Howard, George Reisch, and Thomas Uebel is revealing the political and social motivations of members of the Vienna Circle of logical positivists such as Otto Neurath, Rudolf Carnap, Hans Hahn, and Philipp Frank.2 Sarah Richardson, on the other hand, questions whether the logical positivists can serve as a model for a political philosophy of science today.3 The debate concerns whether the logical positivists just happened to be involved in the politics of their time 3 © 2018 University of Pittsburgh Press. All rights reserved. 4 Warren Schmaus, Mary Pickering, and Michel Bourdeau or whether there was any connection between their politics and their phi- losophy of science.
    [Show full text]