DOCSLIB.ORG

Higgsino Models and Parameter Determination

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Higgsino Models and Parameter Determination Light higgsino models and parameter determination Krzysztof Rolbiecki IFT-CSIC, Madrid in collaboration with: Mikael Berggren, Felix Brummer,¨ Jenny List, Gudrid Moortgat-Pick, Hale Sert and Tania Robens ECFA Linear Collider Workshop 2013 27–31 May 2013, DESY, Hamburg Krzysztof Rolbiecki (IFT-CSIC, Madrid) Higgsino LSP ECFA LC2013, 29 May 2013 1 / 21 SUSY @ LHC What does LHC tell us about 1st/2nd gen. squarks? ! quite heavy Gaugino and stop searches model dependent – limits weaker ATLAS SUSY Searches* - 95% CL Lower Limits ATLAS Preliminary Status: LHCP 2013 ∫Ldt = (4.4 - 20.7) fb-1 s = 7, 8 TeV miss -1 Model e, µ, τ, γ Jets ET ∫Ldt [fb ] Mass limit Reference ~ ~ ~ ~ MSUGRA/CMSSM 0 2-6 jets Yes 20.3 q, g 1.8 TeV m(q)=m(g) ATLAS-CONF-2013-047 ~ ~ ~ ~ MSUGRA/CMSSM 1 e, µ 4 jets Yes 5.8 q, g 1.24 TeV m(q)=m(g) ATLAS-CONF-2012-104 ~ ~ MSUGRA/CMSSM 0 7-10 jets Yes 20.3 g 1.1 TeV any m(q) ATLAS-CONF-2013-054 ~~ ~ ∼0 ~ ∼ qq, q→qχ 0 2-6 jets Yes 20.3 m(χ0 ) = 0 GeV ATLAS-CONF-2013-047 1 q 740 GeV 1 ~~ ~ ∼0 ~ ∼ gg, g→qqχ 0 2-6 jets Yes 20.3 m(χ0 ) = 0 GeV ATLAS-CONF-2013-047 1 g 1.3 TeV 1 ∼± ~ ∼± ~ ∼ ∼ ± ∼ ~ Gluino med. χ (g→qqχ ) 1 e, µ 2-4 jets Yes 4.7 g 900 GeV m(χ 0 ) < 200 GeV, m(χ ) = 0.5(m(χ 0 )+m( g)) 1208.4688 ~~ ∼ ∼ ∼ 1 1 → χ0χ 0 µ ~ χ 0 gg qqqqll(ll) 2 e, (SS) 3 jets Yes 20.7 g 1.1 TeV m( 1 ) < 650 GeV ATLAS-CONF-2013-007 ~ 1 1 ~ GMSB (l NLSP) 2 e, µ 2-4 jets Yes 4.7 g 1.24 TeV tanβ < 15 1208.4688 ~ ~ GMSB (l NLSP) 1-2 τ 0-2 jets Yes 20.7 tanβ >18 ATLAS-CONF-2013-026 Inclusive searches g 1.4 TeV ∼ γ ~ χ 0 GGM (bino NLSP) 2 0 Yes 4.8 g 1.07 TeV m( 1 ) > 50 GeV 1209.0753 ~ ∼ GGM (wino NLSP) 1 e, µ + γ 0 Yes 4.8 g 619 GeV m(χ 0 ) > 50 GeV ATLAS-CONF-2012-144 ∼ 1 γ ~ χ 0 GGM (higgsino-bino NLSP) 1 b Yes 4.8 g 900 GeV m( 1 ) > 220 GeV 1211.1167 ~ ~ GGM (higgsino NLSP) 2 e, µ (Z) 0-3 jets Yes 5.8 g 690 GeV m(H) > 200 GeV ATLAS-CONF-2012-152 ~ Gravitino LSP 0 mono-jet Yes 10.5 F 1/2 scale 645 GeV m(G) > 10-4 eV ATLAS-CONF-2012-147 ~ ∼ ~ ∼ g→bbχ0 0 3 b Yes 12.8 g 1.24 TeV m(χ 0 ) < 200 GeV ATLAS-CONF-2012-145 ~ ∼ 1 ~ ∼ 1 g→ttχ0 2 e, µ (SS) 0-3 b No 20.7 g 900 GeV m(χ 0 ) < 500 GeV ATLAS-CONF-2013-007 ∼1 ∼ 1 gen. ~ ~ → χ0 m(χ 0 ) <200 GeV g tt 0 7-10 jets Yes 20.3 g 1.14 TeV ATLAS-CONF-2013-054 med. 1 rd ~ ∼1 ~ ∼ ~ 0 0 3 g g→ttχ 0 3 b Yes 12.8 g 1.15 TeV m(χ ) < 200 GeV ATLAS-CONF-2012-145 1 1 ~ ~ ~ ∼ ~ ∼ b b , b →bχ0 0 2 b Yes 20.1 m(χ 0 ) < 100 GeV ATLAS-CONF-2013-053 ~1~1 ~1 ∼ 1 b 1 100-630 GeV 1 ± ~ ∼ ± ∼ b b , b →tχ 2 e, µ (SS) 0-3 b Yes 20.7 m(χ ) = 2 m(χ 0 ) ATLAS-CONF-2013-007 1 1 1 1 b 1 430 GeV 1 1 ~~ ~ ∼± ~ ∼ → χ µ χ 0 t1t1 (light), t1 b 1-2 e, 1-2 b Yes 4.7 t 167 GeV m( 1 ) = 55 GeV 1208.4305, 1209.2102 ~~ ~ 1∼ ~1 ∼ ~ ~ ∼ t t (light), t →Wbχ 0 2 e, µ 0-2 jets Yes 20.3 m(χ 0 ) = m(t ) - m(W) - 50 GeV, m(t ) << m(χ ± ) ATLAS-CONF-2013-048 1 1 1 1∼ t 1 220 GeV 1 1 1 1 ~~ ~ ± ~ ∼ ~ ∼ ± t t (medium), t →bχ 2 e, µ 0-2 jets Yes 20.3 m(χ 0 ) = 0 GeV, m(t )-m(χ ) = 10 GeV ATLAS-CONF-2013-048 1 1 1 1 t 1 150-440 GeV 1 1 1 ~~ ~ ∼± ~ ∼ ∼ ∼ t t (medium), t →bχ 0 2 b Yes 20.1 t 150-580 GeV m(χ 0 ) < 200 GeV, m(χ ± )-m( χ ± ) = 5 GeV ATLAS-CONF-2013-053 ~1~1 ~ 1 ∼ 1 ~1 ∼ 1 1 1 t t (heavy), t →tχ0 1 e, µ 1 b Yes 20.7 t 200-610 GeV m(χ 0 ) = 0 GeV ATLAS-CONF-2013-037 ~1~1 ~1 ∼1 1 ∼ 1 gen. squarks ~ → χ0 χ 0 t1t1 (heavy), t1 t 0 2 b Yes 20.5 t 320-660 GeV m( 1 ) = 0 GeV ATLAS-CONF-2013-024 rd ~~ 1 1 ∼ ~ 0 3 direct production µ χ t1t1 (natural GMSB) 2 e, (Z) 1 b Yes 20.7 t 500 GeV m( 1 ) > 150 GeV ATLAS-CONF-2013-025 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~1 ~ ∼ t t , t →t +Z 3 e, µ (Z) 1 b Yes 20.7 m(t ) = m(χ 0 ) + 180 GeV ATLAS-CONF-2013-025 2 2 2 1 t 2 520 GeV 1 1 ~ ~ ~ ∼0 ~ ∼ lL,RlL,R, l→lχ 2 e, µ 0 Yes 20.3 l 85-315 GeV m(χ 0 ) = 0 GeV ATLAS-CONF-2013-049 ∼ ∼ ∼ ~ 1∼ ∼ ∼ 1 ~∼ ∼ ∼ χ+χ- χ+→ ν ν µ ± χ 0 ν χ ± χ 0 , l (l ) 2 e, 0 Yes 20.3 χ 125-450 GeV m( 1 ) = 0 GeV, m(l, ) = 0.5(m( 1 ) + m( 1 )) ATLAS-CONF-2013-049 ∼1∼1 ∼1 ∼ ∼ ∼1 ∼ ∼ ∼ ∼ ∼ χ+ χ -, χ+ → τν (τν ) 2 τ 0 Yes 20.7 χ± 180-330 GeV m(χ 0 ) = 0 GeV, m(τ,ν ) = 0.5(m(χ ± ) + m(χ 0 )) ATLAS-CONF-2013-028 ∼1∼1 1 ~ ~ ∼ ∼~ ∼ ∼1 ∼ ∼ ∼ 1 ∼ ~ ∼ ∼ 1 ∼ 1 ± 0 ± ± 0 0 ± 0 EW direct χ χ → l ν l l(ν ν ), lν l l(ν ν ) 3 e, µ 0 Yes 20.7 χ χ0 m(χ ) = m(χ ), m(χ ) = 0, m(l,ν ) = 0.5(m(χ ) + m(χ )) ATLAS-CONF-2013-035 1 2 L L L , 600 GeV 1 2 1 1 1 ∼±∼ ∼ (*) ∼ ∼1 ∼2 ∼ ∼ ∼ χ χ 0 → W(*) χ 0 Z χ0 3 e, µ 0 Yes 20.7 χ± , χ0 315 GeV m(χ ± ) = m(χ 0 ), m(χ 0 ) = 0, sleptons decoupled ATLAS-CONF-2013-035 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 ∼±∼ ± ∼ ± ∼± ∼ Direct χ χ prod., long-lived χ 0 1 jet Yes 4.7 χ 220 GeV 1 < τ(χ ± ) < 10 ns 1210.2852 ~1 1 1 ~1 1 Stable g, R-hadrons 0-2 e, µ 0 Yes 4.7 g 985 GeV 1211.1597 ∼ ∼ GMSB, stable τ, low β 2 e, µ 0 Yes 4.7 τ 300 GeV 5 < tanβ < 20 1211.1597 ∼ ~ ∼ ∼ ∼ GMSB, χ0 → γ G,long-lived χ 0 2 γ 0 Yes 4.7 χ0 230 GeV 0.4 < τ(χ 0 ) < 2 ns 1304.6310 ∼ 1 1 1 1 χ0 → µ µ ~ τ ~ Long-lived particles qq (RPV) 1 e, 0 Yes 4.4 1 mm < c < 1 m, g decoupled 1210.7451 1 q 700 GeV ∼ ∼ ∼ , LFV pp→ν τ +X, ν τ →e+µ 2 e, µ 0 - 4.6 ν τ 1.61 TeV λ =0.10, λ =0.05 1212.1272 ∼ ∼ ∼ 311 132 →ν ν → µ τ µ τ λ , λ LFV pp τ +X, τ e( )+ 1 e, + 0 - 4.6 ν τ 1.1 TeV 311=0.10, 1(2)33=0.05 1212.1272 µ ~ ~ ~ ~ τ Bilinear RPV CMSSM 1 e, 7 jets Yes 4.7 q, g 1.2 TeV m(q) = m(g), c LSP < 1 mm ATLAS-CONF-2012-140 ∼+∼- ∼+ ∼0 ∼ 0 ∼± ∼ χ χ , χ → Wχ , χ →eeν µ,eµν 4 e, µ 0 Yes 20.7 χ 760 GeV m(χ 0 ) > 300 GeV, λ > 0 ATLAS-CONF-2013-036 1 1 1 1 1 e 1 1 121 ∼ ∼ ∼ ∼ ∼ ∼± ∼ RPV χ+χ- χ+→ χ0 χ 0→ττν τν µ τ χ 0 λ , W , e,e τ 3 e, + 0 Yes 20.7 χ 350 GeV m( 1 ) > 80 GeV, 133 > 0 ATLAS-CONF-2013-036 ~1 1 1 1 1 ~1 g → qqq 0 6 jets - 4.6 g 666 GeV 1210.4813 ~ ~ ~→ → µ ~ g t1t, t1 bs 2 e, (SS) 0-3 b Yes 20.7 g 880 GeV ATLAS-CONF-2013-007 Scalar gluon 0 4 jets - 4.6 sgluon 100-287 GeV incl. limit from 1110.2693 1210.4826 WIMP interaction (D5, Dirac χ) 0 mono-jet Yes 10.5 M* scale 704 GeV m(χ) < 80 GeV, limit of < 687 GeV for D8 ATLAS-CONF-2012-147 Other s = 7 TeV s = 8 TeV s = 8 TeV 10-1 1 full data partial data full data Mass scale [TeV] *Only a selection of the available mass limits on new states or phenomena is shown. All limits quoted are observed minus 1σ theoretical signal cross section uncertainty. Krzysztof Rolbiecki (IFT-CSIC, Madrid) Higgsino LSP ECFA LC2013, 29 May 2013 2 / 21 Outline 1 Light higgsinos from gauge-gravity mediation 2 Light higgsinos at colliders Krzysztof Rolbiecki (IFT-CSIC, Madrid) Higgsino LSP ECFA LC2013, 29 May 2013 3 / 21 Outline 1 Light higgsinos from gauge-gravity mediation 2 Light higgsinos at colliders Krzysztof Rolbiecki (IFT-CSIC, Madrid) Higgsino LSP ECFA LC2013, 29 May 2013 4 / 21 Light higgsinos L = µ H~ H~ + +m2 + jµj2 jH j2 +m2 + jµj2 jH j2 +::: MSSM u d h.c.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Download -.:: Natural Sciences Publishing
    Quant. Phys. Lett. 5, No. 3, 33-47 (2016) 33 Quantum Physics Letters An International Journal http://dx.doi.org/10.18576/qpl/050302 About Electroweak Symmetry Breaking, Electroweak Vacuum and Dark Matter in a New Suggested Proposal of Completion of the Standard Model In Terms Of Energy Fluctuations of a Timeless Three-Dimensional Quantum Vacuum Davide Fiscaletti* and Amrit Sorli SpaceLife Institute, San Lorenzo in Campo (PU), Italy. Received: 21 Sep. 2016, Revised: 18 Oct. 2016, Accepted: 20 Oct. 2016. Published online: 1 Dec. 2016. Abstract: A model of a timeless three-dimensional quantum vacuum characterized by energy fluctuations corresponding to elementary processes of creation/annihilation of quanta is proposed which introduces interesting perspectives of completion of the Standard Model. By involving gravity ab initio, this model allows the Standard Model Higgs potential to be stabilised (in a picture where the Higgs field cannot be considered as a fundamental physical reality but as an emergent quantity from most elementary fluctuations of the quantum vacuum energy density), to generate electroweak symmetry breaking dynamically via dimensional transmutation, to explain dark matter and dark energy. Keywords: Standard Model, timeless three-dimensional quantum vacuum, fluctuations of the three-dimensional quantum vacuum, electroweak symmetry breaking, dark matter. 1 Introduction will we discover beyond the Higgs door? In the Standard Model with a light Higgs boson, an The discovery made by ATLAS and CMS at the Large important problem is that the electroweak potential is Hadron Collider of the 126 GeV scalar particle, which in destabilized by the top quark. Here, the simplest option in the light of available data can be identified with the Higgs order to stabilise the theory lies in introducing a scalar boson [1-6], seems to have completed the experimental particle with similar couplings.
    [Show full text]
  • Supersymmetric Dark Matter
    Supersymmetric dark matter G. Bélanger LAPTH- Annecy Plan | Dark matter : motivation | Introduction to supersymmetry | MSSM | Properties of neutralino | Status of LSP in various SUSY models | Other DM candidates z SUSY z Non-SUSY | DM : signals, direct detection, LHC Dark matter: a WIMP? | Strong evidence that DM dominates over visible matter. Data from rotation curves, clusters, supernovae, CMB all point to large DM component | DM a new particle? | SM is incomplete : arbitrary parameters, hierarchy problem z DM likely to be related to physics at weak scale, new physics at the weak scale can also solve EWSB z Stable particle protect by symmetry z Many solutions – supersymmetry is one best motivated alternative to SM | NP at electroweak scale could also explain baryonic asymetry in the universe Relic density of wimps | In early universe WIMPs are present in large number and they are in thermal equilibrium | As the universe expanded and cooled their density is reduced Freeze-out through pair annihilation | Eventually density is too low for annihilation process to keep up with expansion rate z Freeze-out temperature | LSP decouples from standard model particles, density depends only on expansion rate of the universe | Relic density | A relic density in agreement with present measurements (Ωh2 ~0.1) requires typical weak interactions cross-section Coannihilation | If M(NLSP)~M(LSP) then maintains thermal equilibrium between NLSP-LSP even after SUSY particles decouple from standard ones | Relic density then depends on rate for all processes
    [Show full text]
  • Higgsino DM Is Dead
    Cornering Higgsino at the LHC Satoshi Shirai (Kavli IPMU) Based on H. Fukuda, N. Nagata, H. Oide, H. Otono, and SS, “Higgsino Dark Matter in High-Scale Supersymmetry,” JHEP 1501 (2015) 029, “Higgsino Dark Matter or Not,” Phys.Lett. B781 (2018) 306 “Cornering Higgsino: Use of Soft Displaced Track ”, arXiv:1910.08065 1. Higgsino Dark Matter 2. Current Status of Higgsino @LHC mono-jet, dilepton, disappearing track 3. Prospect of Higgsino Use of soft track 4. Summary 2 DM Candidates • Axion • (Primordial) Black hole • WIMP • Others… 3 WIMP Dark Matter Weakly Interacting Massive Particle DM abundance DM Standard Model (SM) particle 500 GeV DM DM SM Time 4 WIMP Miracle 5 What is Higgsino? Higgsino is (pseudo)Dirac fermion Hypercharge |Y|=1/2 SU(2)doublet <1 TeV 6 Pure Higgsino Spectrum two Dirac Fermions ~ 300 MeV Radiative correction 7 Pure Higgsino DM is Dead DM is neutral Dirac Fermion HUGE spin-independent cross section 8 Pure Higgsino DM is Dead DM is neutral Dirac Fermion Purepure Higgsino Higgsino HUGE spin-independent cross section 9 Higgsino Spectrum (with gaugino) With Gauginos, fermion number is violated Dirac fermion into two Majorana fermions 10 Higgsino Spectrum (with gaugino) 11 Higgsino Spectrum (with gaugino) No SI elastic cross section via Z-boson 12 [N. Nagata & SS 2015] Gaugino induced Observables Mass splitting DM direct detection SM fermion EDM 13 Correlation These observables are controlled by gaugino mass Strong correlation among these observables for large tanb 14 Correlation These observables are controlled by gaugino mass Strong correlation among these observables for large tanb XENON1T constraint 15 Viable Higgsino Spectrum 16 Current Status of Higgsino @LHC 17 Collider Signals of DM p, e- DM DM is invisible p, e+ DM 18 Collider Signals of DM p, e- DM DM is invisible p, e+ DM Additional objects are needed to see DM.
    [Show full text]
  • Hep-Ph] 19 Nov 2018
    The discreet charm of higgsino dark matter { a pocket review Kamila Kowalska∗ and Enrico Maria Sessoloy National Centre for Nuclear Research, Ho_za69, 00-681 Warsaw, Poland Abstract We give a brief review of the current constraints and prospects for detection of higgsino dark matter in low-scale supersymmetry. In the first part we argue, after per- forming a survey of all potential dark matter particles in the MSSM, that the (nearly) pure higgsino is the only candidate emerging virtually unscathed from the wealth of observational data of recent years. In doing so by virtue of its gauge quantum numbers and electroweak symmetry breaking only, it maintains at the same time a relatively high degree of model-independence. In the second part we properly review the prospects for detection of a higgsino-like neutralino in direct underground dark matter searches, col- lider searches, and indirect astrophysical signals. We provide estimates for the typical scale of the superpartners and fine tuning in the context of traditional scenarios where the breaking of supersymmetry is mediated at about the scale of Grand Unification and where strong expectations for a timely detection of higgsinos in underground detectors are closely related to the measured 125 GeV mass of the Higgs boson at the LHC. arXiv:1802.04097v3 [hep-ph] 19 Nov 2018 ∗[email protected] [email protected] 1 Contents 1 Introduction2 2 Dark matter in the MSSM4 2.1 SU(2) singlets . .5 2.2 SU(2) doublets . .7 2.3 SU(2) adjoint triplet . .9 2.4 Mixed cases . .9 3 Phenomenology of higgsino dark matter 12 3.1 Prospects for detection in direct and indirect searches .
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Supersymmetry
    Introduction to Supersymmetry Pre-SUSY Summer School Corpus Christi, Texas May 15-18, 2019 Stephen P. Martin Northern Illinois University [email protected] 1 Topics: Why: Motivation for supersymmetry (SUSY) • What: SUSY Lagrangians, SUSY breaking and the Minimal • Supersymmetric Standard Model, superpartner decays Who: Sorry, not covered. • For some more details and a slightly better attempt at proper referencing: A supersymmetry primer, hep-ph/9709356, version 7, January 2016 • TASI 2011 lectures notes: two-component fermion notation and • supersymmetry, arXiv:1205.4076. If you find corrections, please do let me know! 2 Lecture 1: Motivation and Introduction to Supersymmetry Motivation: The Hierarchy Problem • Supermultiplets • Particle content of the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model • (MSSM) Need for “soft” breaking of supersymmetry • The Wess-Zumino Model • 3 People have cited many reasons why extensions of the Standard Model might involve supersymmetry (SUSY). Some of them are: A possible cold dark matter particle • A light Higgs boson, M = 125 GeV • h Unification of gauge couplings • Mathematical elegance, beauty • ⋆ “What does that even mean? No such thing!” – Some modern pundits ⋆ “We beg to differ.” – Einstein, Dirac, . However, for me, the single compelling reason is: The Hierarchy Problem • 4 An analogy: Coulomb self-energy correction to the electron’s mass A point-like electron would have an infinite classical electrostatic energy. Instead, suppose the electron is a solid sphere of uniform charge density and radius R. An undergraduate problem gives: 3e2 ∆ECoulomb = 20πǫ0R 2 Interpreting this as a correction ∆me = ∆ECoulomb/c to the electron mass: 15 0.86 10− meters m = m + (1 MeV/c2) × .
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1412.5952V2 [Hep-Ph] 6 May 2015 Contents
    Prepared for submission to JHEP Hunting electroweakinos at future hadron colliders and direct detection experiments Giovanni Grilli di Cortona SISSA - International School for Advanced Studies, Via Bonomea 265, I-34136 Trieste, Italy INFN, Sezione di Trieste, via Valerio 2, I-34127 Trieste, Italy E-mail: [email protected] Abstract: We analyse the mass reach for electroweakinos at future hadron colliders and their interplay with direct detection experiments. Motivated by the LHC data, we focus on split supersymmetry models with different electroweakino spectra. We find for example that a 100 TeV collider may explore Winos up to 7 TeV in low scale gauge mediation ∼ models or thermal Wino dark matter around 3 TeV in models of anomaly mediation with long-lived Winos. We show moreover how collider searches and direct detection experiments have the potential to cover large part of the parameter space even in scenarios where the lightest neutralino does not contribute to the whole dark matter relic density. Keywords: ArXiv ePrint: arXiv:1412.5952v2 [hep-ph] 6 May 2015 Contents 1 Introduction1 2 Future reach at hadron colliders3 2.1 Wino-Bino simplified model4 2.2 Long-lived Wino6 2.3 GMSB Wino-Bino simplified model7 2.4 GMSB higgsino simplified model8 3 Interplay with Direct Dark Matter searches9 3.1 Models with universal gaugino masses 11 3.2 Anomaly Mediation 14 4 Conclusions 17 1 Introduction The LHC is getting ready to start its second run at a centre of mass energy of 13 TeV in 2015. In the first run ATLAS and CMS have discovered the Higgs boson [1,2] and have put a huge effort into looking for new physics.
    [Show full text]
  • General Neutralino NLSP with Gravitino Dark Matter Vs. Big Bang Nucleosynthesis
    General Neutralino NLSP with Gravitino Dark Matter vs. Big Bang Nucleosynthesis II. Institut fur¨ Theoretische Physik, Universit¨at Hamburg Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY, Theory Group Diplomarbeit zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades Diplom-Physiker (diploma thesis - with correction) Verfasser: Jasper Hasenkamp Matrikelnummer: 5662889 Studienrichtung: Physik Eingereicht am: 31.3.2009 Betreuer(in): Dr. Laura Covi, DESY Zweitgutachter: Prof. Dr. Gun¨ ter Sigl, Universit¨at Hamburg ii Abstract We study the scenario of gravitino dark matter with a general neutralino being the next- to-lightest supersymmetric particle (NLSP). Therefore, we compute analytically all 2- and 3-body decays of the neutralino NLSP to determine the lifetime and the electro- magnetic and hadronic branching ratio of the neutralino decaying into the gravitino and Standard Model particles. We constrain the gravitino and neutralino NLSP mass via big bang nucleosynthesis and see how those bounds are relaxed for a Higgsino or a wino NLSP in comparison to the bino neutralino case. At neutralino masses & 1 TeV, a wino NLSP is favoured, since it decays rapidly via a newly found 4-vertex. The Higgsino component becomes important, when resonant annihilation via heavy Higgses can occur. We provide the full analytic results for the decay widths and the complete set of Feyn- man rules necessary for these computations. This thesis closes any gap in the study of gravitino dark matter scenarios with neutralino NLSP coming from approximations in the calculation of the neutralino decay rates and its hadronic branching ratio. Zusammenfassung Diese Diplomarbeit befasst sich mit dem Gravitino als Dunkler Materie, wobei ein allge- meines Neutralino das n¨achstleichteste supersymmetrische Teilchen (NLSP) ist.
    [Show full text]
  • Hidden SUSY at the LHC: the Light Higgsino-World Scenario and the Role of a Lepton Collider Howard Baer University of Oklahoma, [email protected]
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Faculty Publications, Department of Physics and Research Papers in Physics and Astronomy Astronomy 2011 Hidden SUSY at the LHC: the light higgsino-world scenario and the role of a lepton collider Howard Baer University of Oklahoma, [email protected] Vernon Barger University of Wisconsin, [email protected] Peisi Huang University of Wisconsin, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/physicsfacpub Baer, Howard; Barger, Vernon; and Huang, Peisi, "Hidden SUSY at the LHC: the light higgsino-world scenario and the role of a lepton collider" (2011). Faculty Publications, Department of Physics and Astronomy. 197. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/physicsfacpub/197 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Research Papers in Physics and Astronomy at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications, Department of Physics and Astronomy by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Published for SISSA by Springer Received: August 4, 2011 Revised: October 10, 2011 Accepted: October 21, 2011 Published: November 8, 2011 Hidden SUSY at the LHC: the light higgsino-world JHEP11(2011)031 scenario and the role of a lepton collider Howard Baer,a Vernon Bargerb and Peisi Huangb aDept. of Physics and Astronomy, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019, U.S.A. bDept. of Physics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, U.S.A. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Abstract: While the SUSY flavor, CP and gravitino problems seem to favor a very heavy spectrum of matter scalars, fine-tuning in the electroweak sector prefers low values of superpotential mass µ.
    [Show full text]
  • Review Article the Discreet Charm of Higgsino Dark Matter: a Pocket Review
    Hindawi Advances in High Energy Physics Volume 2018, Article ID 6828560, 15 pages https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6828560 Review Article The Discreet Charm of Higgsino Dark Matter: A Pocket Review Kamila Kowalska and Enrico Maria Sessolo National Centre for Nuclear Research, Hoza˙ 69, 00-681 Warsaw, Poland Correspondence should be addressed to Enrico Maria Sessolo; [email protected] Received 9 February 2018; Accepted 12 June 2018; Published 11 July 2018 Academic Editor: Yann Mambrini Copyright © 2018 Kamila Kowalska and Enrico Maria Sessolo. Tis is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Te publication of this article was funded by SCOAP3. We give a brief review of the current constraints and prospects for detection of higgsino dark matter in low-scale supersymmetry. In the frst part we argue, afer performing a survey of all potential dark matter particles in the MSSM, that the (nearly) pure higgsino is the only candidate emerging virtually unscathed from the wealth of observational data of recent years. In doing so by virtue of its gauge quantum numbers and electroweak symmetry breaking only, it maintains at the same time a relatively high degree of model-independence. In the second part we properly review the prospects for detection of a higgsino-like neutralino in direct underground dark matter searches, collider searches, and indirect astrophysical signals. We provide estimates for the typical scale of the superpartners and fne tuning in the context of traditional scenarios where the breaking of supersymmetry is mediated at about the scale of Grand Unifcation and where strong expectations for a timely detection of higgsinos in underground detectors are closely related to the measured 125 GeV mass of the Higgs boson at the LHC.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1910.08065V3 [Hep-Ph] 20 Feb 2020 Didate Is, Therefore, a Crucial Target for the DM Hunting
    KYUSHU-RCAPP-2019-05, UT-19-24, IPMU19-0145 Cornering Higgsino: Use of Soft Displaced Track Hajime Fukuda,1, 2 Natsumi Nagata,3 Hideyuki Oide,4 Hidetoshi Otono,5 and Satoshi Shirai6 1Theoretical Physics Group, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, CA 94720, USA 2Berkeley Center for Theoretical Physics, Department of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA 3Department of Physics, University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan 4Department of Physics, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo 152-8551 5Research Center for Advanced Particle Physics, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 819-0395, Japan 6Kavli IPMU (WPI), UTIAS, The University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Chiba 277-8583, Japan (Dated: February 24, 2020) Higgsino has been intensively searched for in the LHC experiments in recent years. Currently, there is an uncharted region beyond the LEP Higgsino mass limit where the mass splitting between the neutral and charged Higgsinos is around 0:3{1 GeV, which is unexplored by either the soft di-lepton or disappearing track searches. This region is, however, of great importance from a phe- nomenological point of view, as many supersymmetric models predict such a mass spectrum. In this letter, we propose a possibility of filling this gap by using a soft micro-displaced track in addition to the mono-jet event selection, which allows us to discriminate a signature of the charged Higgsino decay from the Standard Model background. It is found that this new strategy is potentially sen- sitive to a Higgsino mass of . 180 (250) GeV at the LHC Run2 (HL-LHC) for a charged-neutral mass splitting of ' 0:5 GeV.
    [Show full text]
  • Supersymmetric Particle Searches
    Citation: M. Tanabashi et al. (Particle Data Group), Phys. Rev. D 98, 030001 (2018) and 2019 update Supersymmetric Particle Searches m m The exclusion of particle masses within a mass range ( 1, 2) m −m will be denoted with the notation “none 1 2” in the VALUE column of the following Listings. The latest unpublished results are described in the “Supersymmetry: Experiment” review. See the related review(s): Supersymmetry, Part I (Theory) Supersymmetry, Part II (Experiment) CONTENTS: χ0 (Lightest Neutralino) mass limit e1 Accelerator limits for stable χ0 − e1 Bounds on χ0 from dark matter searches − e1 χ0-p elastic cross section − 1 eSpin-dependent interactions Spin-independent interactions Other bounds on χ0 from astrophysics and cosmology − e1 Unstable χ0 (Lightest Neutralino) mass limit − e1 χ0, χ0, χ0 (Neutralinos) mass limits e2 e3 e4 χ±, χ± (Charginos) mass limits e1 e2 Long-lived χ± (Chargino) mass limit ν (Sneutrino)e mass limit Chargede sleptons R-parity conserving e (Selectron) mass limit − R-partiy violating e e(Selectron) mass limit − R-parity conservinge µ (Smuon) mass limit − R-parity violating µ e(Smuon) mass limit − R-parity conservinge τ (Stau) mass limit − R-parity violating τ e(Stau) mass limit − Long-lived ℓ (Slepton)e mass limit − e q (Squark) mass limit e R-parity conserving q (Squark) mass limit − R-parity violating q e(Squark) mass limit − Long-lived q (Squark) masse limit b (Sbottom)e mass limit e R-parity conserving b (Sbottom) mass limit − e R-parity violating b (Sbottom) mass limit − e t (Stop) mass limit e R-parity conserving t (Stop) mass limit − R-parity violating t (Stop)e mass limit − Heavy g (Gluino) mass limite R-paritye conserving heavy g (Gluino) mass limit − R-parity violating heavy g e(Gluino) mass limit − Long-lived g (Gluino) mass limite Light G (Gravitino)e mass limits from collider experiments e Supersymmetry miscellaneous results HTTP://PDG.LBL.GOV Page 1 Created: 8/2/2019 16:43 Citation: M.
    [Show full text]
  • Vacuum Stability and Supersymmetry at High Scales with Two H Doublets
    VACUUM STABILITY AND SUPERSYMMETRY AT HIGH SCALES WITH TWO H DOUBLETS F. BRUMMER¨ Laboratoire Univers et Particules de Montpellier, UMR5299, CNRS & Universit´e de Montpellier, Place Eug`ene Bataillon, 34095 Montpellier, France We consider two-H doublet models (THDMs) with a supersymmetric UV completion.1 Con- trary to the Standard Model, THDMs can be embedded in high-scale supersymmetry with a SUSY breaking scale as high as the scale of grand unification. The stability of the elec- troweak vacuum and experimental constraints point towards low values of tan β 2and a pseudoscalar mass of at least about a TeV. If the higgsino superpartners of the H fields are also kept light, the conclusions are similar and essentially independent of the higgsino mass. However, if all gauginos are also given electroweak-scale masses (split supersymmetry with two H doublets), the predicted Standard Model-like H bosonmassisalwaystoolarge. Light neutral and charged higgsinos emerge as a promising signature of minimal theories with supersymmetric UV completions at high scales, and can be searched for at colliders. 1 Introduction In the history of particle physics, we have found that the world tends to exhibit more and more symmetry when probing shorter and shorter distance scales. Therefore it seems not unreasonable to speculate that, at extremely high energies, the fundamental constituents of nature and their interactions will be governed by supersymmetry and possibly additional space-time dimensions. However, with our present knowledge we cannot predict at what scale these structures will appear. Before the LHC era, a plausible and well-motivated possibility for the scale of supersymmetry was just above the electroweak scale.
    [Show full text]