Arxiv:1910.08065V3 [Hep-Ph] 20 Feb 2020 Didate Is, Therefore, a Crucial Target for the DM Hunting

KYUSHU-RCAPP-2019-05, UT-19-24, IPMU19-0145 Cornering Higgsino: Use of Soft Displaced Track Hajime Fukuda,1, 2 Natsumi Nagata,3 Hideyuki Oide,4 Hidetoshi Otono,5 and Satoshi Shirai6 1Theoretical Physics Group, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, CA 94720, USA 2Berkeley Center for Theoretical Physics, Department of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA 3Department of Physics, University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan 4Department of Physics, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo 152-8551 5Research Center for Advanced Particle Physics, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 819-0395, Japan 6Kavli IPMU (WPI), UTIAS, The University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Chiba 277-8583, Japan (Dated: February 24, 2020) Higgsino has been intensively searched for in the LHC experiments in recent years. Currently, there is an uncharted region beyond the LEP Higgsino mass limit where the mass splitting between the neutral and charged Higgsinos is around 0:3{1 GeV, which is unexplored by either the soft di-lepton or disappearing track searches. This region is, however, of great importance from a phe- nomenological point of view, as many supersymmetric models predict such a mass spectrum. In this letter, we propose a possibility of filling this gap by using a soft micro-displaced track in addition to the mono-jet event selection, which allows us to discriminate a signature of the charged Higgsino decay from the Standard Model background. It is found that this new strategy is potentially sensitive to a Higgsino mass of . 180 (250) GeV at the LHC Run2 (HL-LHC) for a charged-neutral mass splitting of ' 0:5 GeV. I. INTRODUCTION tion experiments have already put some constraints on the Higgsino DM (see, e.g., Ref. [8]). These experiments, however, suffer from large astrophysical uncertainties [9{ The absence of a Dark Matter (DM) candidate in the 12]. Moreover, these constraints are usually obtained on Standard Model (SM) invokes the strongest motivation the assumption that DM is solely composed of Higgsino, for the extension of the SM. Among various DM can- and would be significantly weaker if this is not the case. didates, Weakly Interacting Massive Particles (WIMPs) Collider experiments are, on the other hand, free from are the most promising and well-motivated, since the cor- such uncertainties, and thus DM searches at colliders can rect DM abundance can be obtained via the conventional offer the most conservative test for the Higgsino DM sce- freeze-out mechanism [1, 2] and many popular extensions nario. of the SM provide such a particle. The Higgsino search strategy at colliders strongly de- Higgsino|the fermionic partner of the Higgs fields in pends on the mass splitting among the Higgsino DM and the supersymmetric SM (SSM)|is a well-known example its isospin partners. If the mass splitting is greater than for a WIMP. If the Higgsino is the lightest supersymmet- O(1) GeV, Higgsinos can be probed with multi-lepton ric particle and its mass is 1 TeV, its thermal relic . signals [13{16]. For small mass difference 300 MeV, abundance does not over-close the Universe [3], making . on the other hand, the charged Higgsino can be long- it a promising candidate for WIMP DM. A similar DM lived and detected in the disappearing charged track candidate, a stable SU(2) doublet fermion, is also fre- L searches [17, 18]. Improvement of the tracking tech- quently considered in the bottom-up approach; system- niques at future colliders may enable to probe even 1 TeV atic classification of DM candidates in terms of gauge Higgsinos with this strategy [19, 20]. charges reveals that the doublet fermion is the simplest Meanwhile, the intermediate region, i.e., mass split- possibility for gauge-portal DM [3{5]. Such a DM can- ting of around 0:3 1 GeV, has never been probed at arXiv:1910.08065v3 [hep-ph] 20 Feb 2020 didate is, therefore, a crucial target for the DM hunting. the LHC. This letter− proposes a new strategy to explore In this context those are collectively referred to as \Hig- this region by utilizing a soft pion from the decay of a gsino" in what follows. charged Higgsino [21], which has a barely discernible life- In SSMs, the Higgsino mass is connected to the scale time with the LHC tracker resolution, and demonstrates of the electroweak symmetry breaking, and thus the nat- such a micro-displaced pion can be an effective signature uralness argument requires it to be around the weak to distinguish the signal events from the SM background. scale [6]. Moreover, in some cases, the Higgsino mass is radiatively generated from the gaugino loops and suppressed by a loop factor compared to the gaugino masses [7]. These theoretical considerations suggest that II. HIGGSINO PHENOMENOLOGY Higgsino is rather light and thus potentially accessible by the LHC experiments. Higgsino H~u;d is a pair of SU(2)L doublet Weyl There are various alternative ways to detect the Hig- fermions with hypercharge Y = 1=2. Conventionally, ± gsino DM. For example, the DM direct/indirect detec- we take the mass term µH~uH~d + h:c: with real and L 3 − 2 positive µ without loss of generality. spin-independent DM-proton scattering cross section σSI: SI 1=2 The completely pure Higgsino DM has already been rad σ excluded, as the DM is a Dirac fermion and the Z-boson- ∆m ∆m + 170 MeV 48 2 ; (5) ± ∼ ± 10− cm mediated nucleon scattering cross section is far above the current direct detection limits. For the Higgsino DM to for tan β 1. The current experimental bound on σSI 46 2 be viable, therefore, some new particles heavier than the is 10 cm (m 0 =100 GeV) for the DM local density − χ1 Higgsino are required. In the minimal SSM (MSSM), ∼ 3 ρχ0 = 0:3 GeV=cm [24]. The present limit has already the mixing with gauginos splits the Higgsino into Majo- 1 imposed a limit ∆mtree > O(1) GeV. Nevertheless, the rana fermions, for which the direct detection limits are region of ∆mtree <± O(100) MeV cannot be probed in avoided [22, 23]. direct detection± experiments even if their sensitivities are improved down to the neutrino floor. The Higgsino doublet is decomposed into two neutral A similar argument can also be made for EDMs. If Majorana fermions (χ0; χ0) and a charged fermion (χ ). 1 2 ± the gaugino-Higgsino system has CP violation, EDMs We adopt the convention ∆m0 mχ0 mχ0 > 0, and ≡ 2 − 1 are induced at two-loop level [25, 26]. The size of the define ∆m mχ± mχ0 . ∆m0 is mainly induced via tree ± 1 EDMs and the mass splitting ∆m are also correlated. the tree-level≡ mixing− with heavier particles|bino or wino It is, however, difficult to probe± the region ∆mtree < in the MSSM|and can be approximated by O(100) MeV even with future experiments [20]. ± 2 2 Therefore, it is important to uncover the parameter cW sW ∆mtree M 2 + ; (1) tree 0 ' Z M M region ∆m < O(100) MeV at colliders. The Hig- 2 1 gsino phenomenology± at colliders is sensitive to the de- where cW (sW ) = cos θW (sin θW ) with θW the Weinberg cay of the heavier Higgsino components, which significantly depend on the mass splittings. If, in particu- angle, and MZ ;M1;M2 are the masses of the Z boson, bino, and wino, respectively. The charged-neutral mass lar, mπ± < ∆m 1 GeV, with mπ± the mass of the ± difference receives electroweak radiative corrections as charged pion π±, the main decay mode of the charged 0 well, being expressed as ∆m = ∆mrad + ∆mtree with Higgsino is χ± χ1;2π± [27]. The partial decay length ± ± ± 0 ! of χ± χ π± is approximately given by [28, 29] ! 1 α s2 µ Z 1 M 2 (1 t) ∆mrad 2 W dt(1 + t) ln 1 + Z ; s 1 2 2− " 3 2 #− ± ' 2π 0 µ t 1 14 mm ∆m mπ± ± (2) Γχ−± χ0π± 1 2 : ! 1 ' ~c × 340 MeV − ∆m tree 2 2 ± tree ∆m0 2 cW sW (6) ∆m + sin 2βMZ ; (3) ± ' 2 M2 − M1 0 The decay χ± χ2π± is also possible if ∆m ∆m0 > ! ± − where α2 is the fine structure constant for the SU(2)L mπ± and this decay rate can be obtained by replacing gauge interaction and tan β Hu = Hd . For µ MZ , ∆m by ∆m ∆m0 in Eq. (6). For larger ∆m , three- ≡ h i h i ± ± ± body decay modes− open up, in which one charged parti- rad α2MZ 2 ∆m sin θW 354 MeV: (4) cle, such as a charged lepton or meson, is emitted. We ± ' 2 ' also include these decay modes in the following analysis. If the tree-level mass difference is small enough, Note that the above estimations can be modified with tree radiative corrections by O(10)% [22]. ∆m 100 MeV, the decay length of the charged Higgsino± is sufficiently long, O(1) cm, so that the disap- In the MSSM, the mass splittings get larger for a larger pearing charged track search can test the Higgsino DM Higgsino-gauginos mixing. This mixing also increases [20], as in the case of the wino DM [30{33]. the DM-nucleon scattering cross sections and electronic dipole moments (EDMs) of the SM fermions. As a re- sult, there is a strong correlation between the Higgsino III. THE SOFT-DISPLACED TRACK SIGNAL mass splittings and these observables [20], and in par- FROM THE HIGGSINO DECAY AT LHC ticular, large mass splitting regions are testable in DM direct detection and EDM experiments. Higgsinos can be pair-produced via the Drell-Yan pro- cess at the LHC, which eventually yield a pair of the 0 To see this correlation, let us consider the Higgsino- lightest Higgsinos χ1, the DM candidate.

Load more