Section 1: Comprehensive Planning Process

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Section 1: Comprehensive Planning Process Philipstown Comprehensive Plan 2006 CHAPTER 1 / BACKGROUND Section 1: Comprehensive Planning Process This Comprehensive Plan is the product of a five-year process in which the residents of Philipstown came together to agree upon a common vision for their future, and the Comprehensive Plan Special Board shaped that vision into this action-oriented document. Over the five years, numerous meetings and two public hearings were held, giving residents many opportunities to offer and respond to ideas and suggestions. This Plan is the culmination of a significant effort by many citizens of Philipstown working together to express who we are and what we want for our future. Although a professional planning consultant provided assistance, this Plan was written by the community and for the community. The process began when the Town Board commissioned a "diagnostic" planning study of the Town by planning consultant Joel Russell. That study, completed in October, 2000, reviewed the 1991 Town Master Plan, and recommended that the Town prepare a more citizen-based comprehensive plan which would be concise and readable, "a new planning document that clearly expresses a set of shared goals and principles." The first step in developing this plan was a town-wide forum bringing a cross-section of the community together to define consensus goals and action strategies to accomplish them. This forum, Philipstown 2020, was held over two and a half days in April, 2001. More than two hundred residents participated. "Philipstown 2020: A Synthesis" (see Appendix A) expresses the outcome of this forum, and its goals were the starting point for preparing this Plan. Those goals have been refined and changed as the community process has evolved. In September 2001 the Town Board appointed the Comprehensive Plan Special Board (CPSB), and charged it with preparing this Plan. The CPSB formed work groups that gathered information and data on five main subjects featured in the goals of Philipstown 2020: business and economic development, housing, infrastructure, natural resources and open space, and recreation. The findings of the work groups are in the appendix to this plan. Throughout the information gathering portion of this work the CPSB made regular presentations to the Town Board and the public. The CPSB, with guidance from Mr. Russell, next developed ten goals and related strategies (Chapter 2) building upon both the shared goals of the 2020 Forum and the information gathered by the work groups. These were presented in two subsequent public workshops to receive feedback from the community. Mr. Russell then advised the CPSB on specific actions to achieve the goals and strategies. These implementation recommendations were based upon input from citizens at the various meetings and workshops that had been held. The recommendations became the basis for Chapter 3, “Implementation,” which addresses regulatory and non-regulatory measures for both the Town and other agencies to achieve the goals in Chapter 2. Chapter 1 of the Plan, “Background,” which includes history and current conditions in town, was written entirely by CPSB volunteers; it lays a foundation for the ten goals. The CPSB held a public hearing on a draft of the Plan in March 2004, during which residents and organi- zations submitted many constructive and detailed comments; some changes and additions were made to the Plan as a result of this input. The revised proposed Plan was then submitted to the Town Board for their review. The Town Board is responsible for adopting the Plan, and held its own public hearing on this proposed Plan in January of 2005. The Planning Board also reviewed the Plan and submitted comments in three letters submitted between October 2004 and March 2005. The Town Board has considered all of this extensive input, provided over a five-year period, and has determined that this Comprehensive Plan should guide the Town over the next 20 years, with reconsideration every five years along the way. 1 Philipstown Comprehensive Plan 2006 CHAPTER 1 / BACKGROUND Section 2: Brief History of Philipstown As Philipstown plans for the future, patterns from the past several centuries are both interesting and instructive. 17th – 18th Century What is now Philipstown was originally acquired from the Wappinger Indians in 1691 by two Dutch traders; six years later Adolphus Philipse, a wealthy merchant, purchased what became known as the Philipse Patent. The Philipses leased sections of their holdings to tenant farmers who cleared what land could be farmed, especially along the Indian trail that became the Albany Post Road, building miles of walls from the stones dug out of their fields, and establishing mills and small economic enterprises. A few of the houses they built are scattered around the town. Among those early settlers were the Hustis, Mandeville, Garrison and Nelson families whose names are familiar here to this day. Beverly Robinson, who married into the Philipse family, was the first Philipse to actually live in the area. His home was in Garrison along what is now Route 9D, and in 1770 he was the founding warden of St. Philip’s Church. The American Revolution divided loyalties among the settlers and farmers. The Philipse heirs supported the King and, as a consequence, most of them lost title to their lands. However, to this day, mineral rights to most Philipstown properties are held by the descendants of the Philipse family. Philipstown’s role in the American Revolution was important but not spectacular: the great chain across the Hudson terminated at Constitution Island; Benedict Arnold fled from here; George Washington passed through from time to time. Troops were garrisoned in Continental Village, while the North and South Redoubts in Garrison were reconnaissance outposts from which enemy moves could be spied upon, and signal fires burned to muster the tenant farmers to arms. As part of Fortress West Point, the massive chain was installed in the spring of 1778; this chain and the forts and redoubts on both sides of the Hudson successfully deterred British attempts to split the rebelling colonies along the Hudson River corridor. Benedict Arnold, one of American history’s most notorious traitors, was headquartered in Garrison at the Beverly Robinson house when he contracted with the British to deliver the fortification plans of West Point, which he commanded. When he learned that his treason was about to be discovered by General Washington, Arnold fled downriver to British protection in New York City. After the war, some of the North Highlands’ tenants bought their lands at auction from New York State and continued to improve services in their small communities. Farming this rough terrain did not produce much surplus. Timbering, however, did. Wood from Highlands forests, shipped down the Hudson, was in great demand in New York City. With the building of the Philipstown Pike in 1815 (now State Route 301), farm produce from as far away as the Connecticut border was shipped to the Hudson for export with Cold Spring as the transfer point. 19th Century Industry and transportation brought about significant changes in Philipstown in the 19th century. The West Point Foundry just south of the Village of Cold Spring began operating in 1817, making use of the abundant natural resources in the area –– iron ore, timber, and the Hudson River. The factory owners, the foremost of whom was Gouveneur Kemble, smuggled skilled Irish foundry workers out of Britain; they in turn trained apprentices to make everything from simple pig iron fireplace grates to complicated wrought iron machines. New York City water pipes are still those made at the Foundry to replace the wooden ones of earlier times. From the outset, however, the West Point Foundry was primarily a gun factory; through the engineering skills of Robert Parrott, a West Point graduate, cannon design improved over the years. (The mountains across the Hudson were used for target practice.) During the Civil War the federal government’s demands for Parrott guns pushed production at Cold Spring to the limit, employing 1,400 workers at its peak. 2 Philipstown Comprehensive Plan 2006 CHAPTER 1 / BACKGROUND The foundry’s success allowed its owners to enjoy the pleasures of a refined, bucolic culture, captured in Thomas Rossiter’s painting, “Pic-Nic on the Hudson”" on display at the Butterfield Memorial Library in Cold Spring. Although most of the Hudson River School’s romantic painters managed to ignore the smoke and grime rising from the foundry, John Ferguson Weir, in “The Gun Foundry,” now hanging in the Foundry School Museum at the Putnam County Historical Society in Cold Spring, realistically depicted the rigor of the casting process. Little remains of the Foundry and the surrounding settlement: there are a few workers’ cottages on Main Street and Kemble Avenue in Cold Spring; a shell of the Administration Building remains on the site itself (now owned by Scenic Hudson); the Foundry School Museum in Cold Spring houses memorabilia from that era. The Chapel of Our Lady, however, still overlooks the Hudson as it did in 1833 when it was built to serve the Irish Catholic foundry workers. Transportation, both ferry service and the railroad, helped shape Garrison. Since the early days of the 18th century Garrison Landing had been an important river crossing and rendezvous point for sloops and boatmen. Harry Garrison, a descendent of Gerret Gerretson for whom the hamlet and landing are named, established the first chartered ferry in 1821; it was a horse-powered scow. This was replaced by a steam ferry, after the railroad was completed through Garrison in 1849. An assortment of ferries followed until the completion of the Bear Mountain Bridge in 1924. The extension of the railroad to Garrison allowed a new prominent business class to have country homes within commuting distance of New York City.
Recommended publications
  • The Van Cortlandt Family
    THE VAN CORTLANDT FAMILY BY L. EFFINGHAM DE FOREST, A.M., J.D., F.I.A.G. THE HISTORICA.L PUBLICATION SOCIETY NEW YORK Copyright 1930 by THE HISTORICAL PUBLICATION SOCIETY NEW YORK NOTE I This account •bf the Van Cortlandt family was prepared as an example of the articles to. be included in the series of volumes entitled THE OLD NEW YORK F.AMILIES . which will be prepared under the editorial super• vision of L. Effingham de Forest and published by The Historical Publication Soc'iety. THE VAN CORTLANDT FAMILY . HE VAN CORTLANDT family was one of the most L"lfluen­ ,..::::==-.1~91:1.1.:...=:::::::~ tial and prominent in Colonial New York. l11 that small group of families interlocked by marriage and interest which largely controlled th~. Colony, Province and State uritil the decline of aristocracy in the government of N 2w York the Van Cortlandts played a strong hand. In comm~rcial, pol­ itical and military 6elds their importance contin:i~d ·for generation~. · The founder of this f~ily iµ the sµi,all_ Dutch town of New Amsterdam was one Oloff Stevense Van,.Co~landt. Of ' •. ~' • t ,- • his origin many fanciful tales have been told and frequ~n::l y the story has been printed ,that he was a descendant of the Dukes of Co:irland and came to. this country as an officer of Dutch troops. · Even Burke of the "P .'!erag ./' once published this a.ccount of the Van Cortlandt origin but it was quietly dropped from later editions of that particular work on the British gentry• .,, Little is actually known of tbe origin of OloJf Stev~~e.
    [Show full text]
  • Putnam County
    History of Putnam County Bench and Bar Hon. John W. Sweeny, Jr., Hon. James F. Reitz, Sallie Sypher, and Sarah Johnson This history is dedicated to the memory of our friend and colleague Judge James F. Reitz whose tireless efforts and love for Putnam County helped to bring this project to fruition. With appreciation of Justice John W. Sweeny, Jr. Judge James F. Reitz Putnam County Deputy Historian Sallie Sypher Former Putnam County Historian Sarah Johnson for the compilation of this history 1 12-05-2019 TIMELINE 1806 Dutchess County courthouse burns & new one proposed further north; Fishkill steals some of Philipstown; Kent town meeting calls for separation 1807 Separation bill passes NYS Senate but fails in Assembly by one vote 1812 Petition from 5 towns for separation; Republicans lose election to Federalists: Separation bill passed by lame duck Republicans & signed by Gov. Tompkins 1814 New Putnam Courthouse opens 1823 Constitution of 1821 establishes judicial districts & governor now appoints judges, local justices and district attorneys. 1847 Constitution of 1846 makes all supreme and county judges, local justices, and district attorneys elective. 1848 (circa) Decision made not move county seat; portico and Corinthian columns added to courthouse 1860 New jail “annexed” to courthouse 1924 Fire sweeps through downtown Carmel and damages courthouse 1925 Decision made to repair, not replace, the courthouse 1937 Women serve on juries in Putnam County, first in NYS. 1949 Putnam County Bar Association founded 1961 New Judiciary Article
    [Show full text]
  • Smith Believes Record Justifies Another Term
    Roots and Shoots: Bagging the longhorned beetle | See page 15 FRIDAY, AUGUST 2, 2013 69 MAIN ST., COLD SPRING, N.Y. | www.philipstown.info Storm King reigns on a summer’s morning | For more Summer Photofest images see page 16. Photo by Kevin Harrison Smith Believes Record Manitou Properties Seeks to Justifies Another Term Turn Plumbush Restaurant into Sees opponent’s criticisms as not serious Pre-K to Grade 6 School were the crime other events. Located just outside of Cold By Kevin E. Foley numbers flowing Philipstown Spring, on Route 9D at Peekskill and the other way. s an incumbent, Putnam County Planning Board Moffatt Roads, the property is in a Town So Smith has a Sheriff Donald B. Smith would ap- of Philipstown hamlet-mixed use zoning right to lay claim gets site plan pear to have the wind at his back district. Manitou Properties does not yet A to success and as he seeks re-election to a fourth term submission own the site, with completion of the sale he proudly touts in office. According to the New York state dependent on site-plan approval. Putnam’s safety By Liz Schevtchuk Department of Criminal Justice Services, Sheriff Smith Photo by K.E. Foley When it met July 25, the Planning record as the Armstrong Putnam County has ranked number one Board declared the proposal a major primary reason in criminal safety for the last three years local business has begun efforts to project (triggering higher level scrutiny), voters should return him to office. This in a row.
    [Show full text]
  • Yonkers' History
    YONKERS’ HISTORY Village History & Economy Was Built Upon the River: The Hudson River and its rich water resources play prominently in the settlement history, social development, economic health and stability of the City of Yonkers. SETTLEMENT Early Role of the Native Americans - The Algonquin Native Americans were some of the earliest settlers of Yonkers. Clustered in a village at the intersection (confluence) of two waterways called the Muhheakantuck (or Shatemuc) and the Neperah. They called their village ‘Nappeckamack’ which meant either ‘trap fishing place’ or ‘rapid water settlement’. Both translations focus on the importance of the water, and its food supply, to the tribe. Today these same two waterways continue to flow in the area, but we know them now as the Hudson and the Saw Mill Rivers. This location met many of the settlement needs of the Native Americans, including: • Protection from attack – shelter – good visibility • Rich food sources from fish, nuts, small animals • Fresh water and • Ready transit opportunities either on foot or by canoe Henry Hudson: The Native people’s settlement needs were the same as those the Europeans looked for in selecting their settlement locations. In the fall of 1609 Henry Hudson sailed the “Half Moon” up the river that would later bear his name, in search of the Northwest Passage. He stopped at Yonkers to trade with the Native people. He noted the Native American settlement, its excellent location and resources. Records show he obtained oysters from the local tribe. Hudson claimed the Hudson River for the Dutch. The Dutch & De Jonkeer - Adriaen van der Donck was a young lawyer working for the Dutch West India Company.
    [Show full text]
  • FRAUNCES TAVERN BLOCK HISTORIC DISTRICT, Borough of Manhattan
    FRAUNCES TAVERN BLOCK HISTORIC DISTRICT DESIGNATION REPORT 1978 City of New York Edward I . Koch, Mayor Landmarks Preservation Commission Kent L. Barwick, Chairman Morris Ketchum, Jr., Vice Chairman Commissioners R. Michael Brown Thomas J. Evans Elisabeth Coit James Marston Fitch George R. Collins Marie V. McGovern William J. Conklin Beverly Moss Spatt FRAUNCES TAVERN BLOCK HISTORIC DISTRICT 66 - c 22 Water DESIGNATED NOV. 14, 1978 LANDMARKS PRESERVATION., COMMISSION FTB-HD Landmarks Preservation Commission November 14, 1978, Designation List 120 LP-0994 FRAUNCES TAVERN BLOCK HISTORIC DISTRICT, Borough of Manhattan BOUNDARIES The property bounded by the southern curb line of Pearl Street, the western curb line of Coenties Slip, the northern curb line of Water Street, and the eastern curb line of Broad Street, Manhattan. TESTIMONY AT THE PUBLIC HEARING On March 14, 1978, the Landmarks Preservation Commission held a public hearing on this area which is now proposed as an Historic District (Item No. 14). Three persons spoke in favor of the proposed designation. There were no speakers in opposition to designation. -1­ FTB-HD Introduction The Fre.unces Tavern Block Historic District, bounded by Fearl, Broad, and Water Streets, and Coenties Slip, stands today as a vivid reminder of the early history and development of this section of Manhattan. Now a single block of low-rise commercial buildings dating from the 19th century--with the exception of the 18th-century Fraunces Tavern--it contrasts greatly with the modern office towers surrounding it. The block, which was created entirely on landfill, was the first extension of the Manhattan shoreline for commercial purposes, and its development involved some of New York's most prominent families.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Hudson Valley Library Manuscript Finding Aid
    Historic Hudson Valley Library Manuscript Finding Aid Beekman Family Collection, 1721-1903 The Beekman family was part of the landed aristocracy of Colonial New York. Through inter-marriage, the Beekmans acquired alliances with the powerful Livingston and Van Cortlandt families. After the American Revolution, Gerard G. Beekman, Jr. was able to purchase a large part of the Philipse estate, which has been preserved by Historic Hudson Valley as Philipsburg Manor. The manuscript collection consists mainly of indentures, deeds and other legal documents pertaining mostly to the immediate family of Gerard G. Beekman, Jr. and his son Stephen D. Beekman. 68 items. Conklin and Chadeayne Family Collection, 1721-1903 The Conklins and Chadeaynes are two related families who resided on the Philipse and Van Cortlandt estates. The Conklins settled in New York about the year 1638, and a house built by Nathaniel Conklin (c.1740-1817) was still standing as of 1979 in Tarrytown. The Chadeayne family , who came to America from France as religious refugees, purchased land from William Skinner, a son-in-law and heir to Stephanus Van Cortlandt, in 1755 and built a homestead which remained in the Chadeayne family for over two centuries. This collection consists of legal papers, deeds, and wills connected with the estates of Nathaniel Conklin and Jacob Chadeayne. 29 items Hamilton Collection, 1786-1843, focus 1843 Alexander Hamilton (1816-1889) was the son of James A. Hamilton (1788-1879) and Mary Morris; grandson of Alexander Hamilton (1757-1804, Secretary of Treasury) and Elizabeth Schuyler (1757-1854, second daughter of Catherine and General John Philip Schuyler).
    [Show full text]
  • An Examination of the Technology That Evolved from the Rogers Locomotive & Machine Company, Paterson, NJ
    Northeast Historical Archaeology Volume 4 1974 Symposium on Industrial Archaeology, Article 4 Paterson, N.J. 1975 An Examination of the Technology that Evolved from the Rogers Locomotive & Machine Company, Paterson, NJ Ralph J. Leo Follow this and additional works at: http://orb.binghamton.edu/neha Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Leo, Ralph J. (1975) "An Examination of the Technology that Evolved from the Rogers Locomotive & Machine Company, Paterson, NJ," Northeast Historical Archaeology: Vol. 4 4, Article 4. https://doi.org/10.22191/neha/vol4/iss1/4 Available at: http://orb.binghamton.edu/neha/vol4/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by The Open Repository @ Binghamton (The ORB). It has been accepted for inclusion in Northeast Historical Archaeology by an authorized editor of The Open Repository @ Binghamton (The ORB). For more information, please contact [email protected]. In Examination of the Technology that lvolved from the Rogers Locomotive & Machine OompanJ, Paterson, I.J. Ralph J.Leo IN TROD UCTION when early canals wer'e still under con­ struction, several pioneers became inter­ ested in the railroad as the possible Until 1815, the southern agricultural primary transportation source for America plantations, northern iron plantations, (Taylor 1951 : 76). Already, some 100 and small community-oriented sawmills years earlier in Britain, Thomas Savery and gristmills supplied services and pro­ and Thomas Neucomens bad perfected the ducts on a very small scale (Taylor 1951: modern type of stationary steam engine; 5-6 ). When population increase and in­ within 50 years it had been improved flux required increased production of steadily and used regularly for power in the basic necessities, horne industry no mining operations.
    [Show full text]
  • WEST POINT FOUNDRY Maker of the Parrott Rifle, Famous Civil War
    WEST POINT FOUNDRY Maker of The Parrott Rifle, Famous Civil War Cannon 1 i i WEST POINT FOUNDRY ! The ~a~ol$onicWars demonstrat&d the importance of artillery in modern warfdre. This was brought home to the American people when in the War Of 1812, they found themselves opposed by heavy artillery in the hand8 of seasoned troops, both of which we lacked. The first graduate of West Point Military Academy, General Joseph Swift determined that it would not happen again. He was able to en- list the financial backing of Gouverneur Kemble, willram Kemble and others. In 1818 they organized the West Point Foundry with kstablishments at Cold Spring and New York City. It was necessary to "bootleg" skilled labor out of Europe by way of Ireland. They were able to evade ship pursuit. Their first government demonstration of heavy cannon firing caused some of the cannon to burst. But they were ablt to prove the fault was not in the cannon but In the faulty ammunitiol So, this Foqndry along with three other foundries were subsidized by the government. Success followed their enterprise until it was said,"there was no other foundry like it in America". Prom 50 to 100 heavy ordnance were made each year with the accompanying ammhition. They branched out. Stoves were just becoming popular. Iron pipe replaced wood for water mains in New York and Boston. Machinery for making sugar in South America and the Southern States was in demand. Engines for steamboats and railroads were made. The famous "DeWitt Clinton" railroad engine was built in 1831.
    [Show full text]
  • Work Shop" Was a Venture
    INTRODUCTION Our Putnam County History Work shop" was a venture. Were there twenty persons who would do creative work? Ifa*, who were they? The response exceeded expectations. Two groups of about forty each, one in Camel and one in Cold Spring, have spent six evenings in group study and discussion. We sought to do four things: (1) to limit aur study to before 1783 (this enabled us to sharpen our historic sense); (2) to locate historic sites and persons, and to select the nost important; (3) to become familiar with the established historic materials, and to locate new materids; and for each nember of the group (4) to relive a bit of the past, and to share it with others. The individual con- tributions have totaled more than forty. The interest was keen, The demand for another 9vork shopn next fall vhs certain, Those who have gone out of their way to make this "work shop" a success, and this publication a reality, include: the County Supervisors a~dYe, Paul Lun:ielius for the use of The Coun%y Building; Supervising Principal ilobert Kristeller and the Camel School fop a Class Ram, the Futnai County Hist~ricalSmiety fcr sponsoring the I Cold. Spring %crk shzp,tt the Eiutterfield Memorial Library for a @ace c.f meeting; Fresi6snt Senjdn Frazier and Mr. Lawrence Head for the shcjwing of their unusunl "Historirz Sites1' pictures and their careful docunentaticm; &kissEdith McIntyre fcr conserving our di* cussions and her typing md printing of our articles, Miss Margaret Pugsley and Mrs. Florence Donelson for a like service; Mrs.
    [Show full text]
  • Butterfield Hospital Phase 1A Literature Review and Sensitivity Analysis
    Appendix J Archaeology Phase 1A Report Butterfield Hospital Phase 1A Literature Review and Sensitivity Analysis Paulding Avenue and Route 9D Town of Cold Spring, Putnam County New York Prepared for: Tim Miller Associates. 10 North Street Cold Spring NY By: CITY/SCAPE: Cultural Resource Consultants 166 Hillair Circle White Plains NY 10605 December 2013 BUTTERFIELD HOSPITAL Paulding Avenue and Route 9D Town of Cold Spring, Putnam County, New York TABLE OF CONTENTS Management Summary Map List Phase 1A Literature Review and Sensitivity Analysis Introduction .......................................................................................................... 1 Project Area Description ...................................................................................... 1 Environmental Information .................................................................................. 5 Potential for the Site to Contain Prehistoric or Historic Cultural Resources ....... 6 History of the Site ................................................................................................ 6 Butterfield Hospital ........................................................................................... 22 National Register Listed .................................................................................... 25 Additional Research Undertaken ....................................................................... 27 Sensitivity Assessment and Site Prediction ....................................................... 27 Conclusions and Recommendations
    [Show full text]
  • A Geophysical and Archaeological Investigation of the Waterpower System at the West Point Foundry, Cold Spring, New York
    Michigan Technological University Digital Commons @ Michigan Tech Dissertations, Master's Theses and Master's Dissertations, Master's Theses and Master's Reports - Open Reports 2004 Waterpower : a geophysical and archaeological investigation of the waterpower system at the West Point Foundry, Cold Spring, New York Kimberly A. Finch Michigan Technological University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/etds Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons Copyright 2004 Kimberly A. Finch Recommended Citation Finch, Kimberly A., "Waterpower : a geophysical and archaeological investigation of the waterpower system at the West Point Foundry, Cold Spring, New York", Master's Thesis, Michigan Technological University, 2004. https://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/etds/307 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/etds Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons WATERPOWER: A GEOPHYSICAL AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION OF THE WATERPOWER SYSTEM AT THE WEST POINT FOUNDRY, COLD SPRING, NEW YORK. By Kimberly A. Finch A THESIS Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE IN INDUSTRIAL ARCHAEOLOGY MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY 2004 2004 Finch This thesis, "Waterpower: A Geophysical and Archaeological Investigation of the Waterpower System at the West Point Foundry, Cold Spring, New York" is hereby approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of MASTER of SCIENCE IN INDUSTRIAL ARCHAEOLOGY DEPARTMENT: Social Sciences Industrial Archaeology Signatures: Thesis Advisor ______________________________ Dr. Susan Martin Department Chair ______________________________ Dr. Bruce Seely Date ______________________________ Acknowledgements i Acknowledgements I would like to thank the Scenic Hudson Land Trust, Inc. for providing me with the opportunity to work on this project. Special thanks to my advisor, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Consumer Identity and Social Stratification in Hacienda La Esperanza, Manatí, Puerto Rico
    THE MATERIAL CULTURE OF SLAVERY: CONSUMER IDENTITY AND SOCIAL STRATIFICATION IN HACIENDA LA ESPERANZA, MANATÍ, PUERTO RICO A Dissertation Submitted to the Temple University Graduate Board In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY by Nydia I. Pontón-Nigaglioni December 2018 Examining Committee Members: Paul F. Farnsworth, Advisory Chair, Department of Anthropology Anthony J. Ranere, Department of Anthropology Patricia Hansell, Department of Anthropology Theresa A. Singleton, External Member, University of Syracuse, Anthropology © Copyright 2018 by Nydia I. Pontón-Nigaglioni All Rights Reserved ii ABSTRACT This dissertation focuses on the human experience during enslavement in nineteenth-century Puerto Rico, one of the last three localities to outlaw the institution of slavery in the Americas. It reviews the history of slavery and the plantation economy in the Caribbean and how the different European regimes regulated slavery in the region. It also provides a literature review on archaeological research carried out in plantation contexts throughout the Caribbean and their findings. The case study for this investigation was Hacienda La Esperanza, a nineteenth- century sugar plantation in the municipality of Manatí, on the north coast of the island. The history of the Manatí Region is also presented. La Esperanza housed one of the largest enslaved populations in Puerto Rico as documented by the slave census of 1870 which registered 152 slaves. The examination of the plantation was accomplished through the implementation of an interdisciplinary approach that combined archival research, field archaeology, anthropological interpretations of ‘material culture’, and geochemical analyses (phosphates, magnetic susceptibility, and organic matter content as determined by loss on ignition).
    [Show full text]