DOCSLIB.ORG

A Holistic Lens on Rice Value Chain Pathways in Senegal; Application of “The Economics of Ecosystems And

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Holistic Lens on Rice Value Chain Pathways in Senegal; Application of “The Economics of Ecosystems And A Holistic Lens on Rice Value Chain Pathways in Senegal; Application of “The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity for Agriculture and Food” Framework Barbara Gemmill-Herren, Renée van Dis, Tabara Ndiaye, Jean Michel Waly Sene Henok Yimer, Gunda Zuellich, Seydina Ousmane Sene Photo credit: CTA Pejeriz project field visit, rice harvest in Senegal, available at: https://flic.kr/p/2gMBYnM A report prepared for the TEEB AgriFood Initiative (The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity for Agriculture and Food) United Nations Environment Geneva, Switzerland Reviewers: Harpinder Sandhu1, Mandiaye Diagne2, Gaudiose Mujawamariya2, Carl Obst3, Andrea Bassi4, Jacob Salcone5, Pablo Vidueira6 Copy editor: Lucy Cockerell5 1 Flinders University 2 Africa Rice Centre 3 IDEEA 4 KnowlEdge Srl 5 UNEP - The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB) 6 Global Alliance for the Future of Food 2 Table of Contents Acronyms and abbreviations ........................................................................................................................ 5 1. Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 8 2. Dimensions of rice beyond yields ........................................................................................................... 14 3. Application of the TEEBAgriFood Framework ......................................................................................... 17 4. The Eco-Agri Rice Food System in Senegal from multiple perspectives: farmer, researcher, civil society, governance/think tank) ................................................................................................................. 21 4.1. Farming systems issues ................................................................................................................... 23 4.2. Land tenure issues ........................................................................................................................... 26 4.3. Research and development on the production level ...................................................................... 28 4.4. Training and education .................................................................................................................... 30 4.5. Traditional knowledge ..................................................................................................................... 32 4.6. Irrigated rice production - General .................................................................................................. 34 4.7. Irrigated rice production - Seeds and genetic diversity ................................................................... 38 4.8. Irrigated rice production - Water management practices .............................................................. 40 4.9. Irrigated rice production - Fertilizer management practices .......................................................... 43 4.10. Irrigated rice production - Residue management ......................................................................... 46 4.11. Irrigated rice production - Management of greenhouse gas emissions ....................................... 48 4.12. Irrigated rice production - Pest and weed management .............................................................. 49 4.13. Rice production - Addressing salinization...................................................................................... 53 4.14. Rice production - Inputs and subsidies .......................................................................................... 55 4.15. Rice production - Agricultural credit ............................................................................................. 56 4.16. Diversification, integration of fish with rice .................................................................................. 58 4.17. Rainfed lowland or upland rice production - General ................................................................... 61 4.18. Import vs. domestic production .................................................................................................... 63 4.19. Employment .................................................................................................................................. 64 4.20. Equity ............................................................................................................................................. 66 4.21. Environmental impact ................................................................................................................... 67 4.22. Fair pricing ..................................................................................................................................... 68 3 4.2. Rice processing ..................................................................................................................................... 69 4.2.1. Processing infrastructure and investment ................................................................................... 69 4.2.2. Ownership of processing facilities ................................................................................................ 72 4.2.3. Use of rice by-products ................................................................................................................. 72 4.3. Rice distribution ................................................................................................................................... 74 4.3.1. Transportation .............................................................................................................................. 74 4.3.2. Continuity of supply ...................................................................................................................... 74 4.3.3. Rice markets-general .................................................................................................................... 75 4.3.4. Organization of marketing ............................................................................................................ 76 4.3.5. Credit in the value chain ............................................................................................................... 76 4.4. Rice consumption ................................................................................................................................. 77 4.4.1. Consumption patterns and policies .............................................................................................. 77 4.4.2. Local demand vs. imported .......................................................................................................... 80 4.4.3. Cultural importance ...................................................................................................................... 82 4.4.4. Food security/food sovereignty.................................................................................................... 83 4.4.5. Governance across the food value chain...................................................................................... 84 5. Another Road Taken: Articulation of Coherent Policy Responses to a New Agricultural Paradigm .. 87 6. System dynamics model and scenario definition ............................................................................... 92 6.1. Scenario description and methodology ..................................................................................... 95 6.2. T21-iSDG model: representation of the system .............................................................................. 99 6.2. Key indicators: measurement of the impact ........................................................................... 103 7. Results of scenario simulation: Impact on four types of capital ........................................................... 105 8. Conclusions and limitations .................................................................................................................. 111 9: Recommendations ................................................................................................................................ 122 References ................................................................................................................................................ 129 Annex 1 ..................................................................................................................................................... 144 Annex 2. .................................................................................................................................................... 146 4 Acronyms and abbreviations AE Agroecology ANB Autorité Nationale de Biosécurité ANCAR Agence Nationale de Conseil Agricole et Rural ANSD Agence Nationale de la Statistique et de la Démographie, République du Sénégal ANSTS Académie Nationale des Sciences et Techniques du Sénégal ARAA Agence Régionale pour l'Agriculture et l'Alimentation ARM Agence de Régulation des Marchés ARN Association des Riziers du Nord AquaStat FAO’s Information System on Water and Agriculture ASCOSEN Association des Consommateurs du Sénégal ASPRODEB Association Sénégalaise pour la Promotion du Developpement par la Base AWD Alternate Wetting and Drying BAU “Business As Usual” BNDE Banque Nationale pour le Développement Economique BRVM Bourse Régionale des Valeurs Mobilières CADl Centre d'appui au Développement Local CCGA Changing Course in Global Agriculture CEDEAO Communauté Economique des Etats de l'Afrique de
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Circular Economy in Africa-EU Cooperation
    Circular Economy in Africa-EU Cooperation Country Report Senegal Written by November - 2020 EUROPEAN COMMISSION Directorate-General for Environment Directorate F – Global Sustainable Development Unit F2 - Bilateral & Regional Environmental Cooperation Contact: Gaëtan Ducroux E-mail: [email protected] European Commission B-1049 Brussels EUROPEAN COMMISSION Circular Economy in Africa-EU Cooperation Country Report Senegal Authors: Bonnaire, S.M.; Jagot, J.; Spinazzé, C.; Potgieter, J.E.; Rajput, J.; Hemkhaus, M.; Ahlers, J.; Koehler, J.; Van Hummelen, S. & McGovern, M. Acknowledgements We acknowledge the valuable contribution of several co-workers from within the four participating institutions, as well as the feedback received from DG Environment and other DG’s of the European Commission as well as the Members of the EU delegation to Senegal. Preferred citation Bonnaire, S.M.; Jagot, J.; Spinazzé, C. (2020) Circular economy in the Africa-EU cooperation - Country report for Senegal. Country report under EC Contract ENV.F.2./ETU/2018/004 Project: “ “Circular Economy in Africa-Eu cooperation”, Trinomics B.V., ACEN, adelphi Consult GmbH and Cambridge Econometrics Ltd. In association with: LEGAL NOTICE This document has been prepared for the European Commission however it reflects the views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. More information on the European Union is available on the Internet (http://www.europa.eu). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2020 PDF ISBN 978-92-76-26828-4 doi:10.2779/042060 KH-06-20-056-EN-N © European Union, 2020 The Commission’s reuse policy is implemented by Commission Decision 2011/833/EU of 12 December 2011 on the reuse of Commission documents (OJ L 330, 14.12.2011, p.
    [Show full text]
  • White Paper for a Sustainable Peace in Casamance
    White Paper for a Sustainable Peace in Casamance Perspectives from Women and Local Populations August 2019 Content 3. Acronyms & Abbreviations 4. Acknowledgements 5. Foreword 7. Cry For Action Of The Women Of Casamance! 8. Preface 9. Introduction 9. Context 11. Historical background of the conflict and the peace process 13. The Conflict’s Impacts On Local Populations, Women And Youth 13. Socioeconomic and environmental impacts 15. Casamance populations’ perceptions and feelings of exclusion 17. The conflict’s specific impacts on women 18. A permanent insecurity 19. Strategies And Perspectives From Civil Society 20. Civil society actors 21. Addressing challenges and establishing peace 23. Actions and approaches 25. Conditions for effective and inclusive participation 26. Women’s participation in peace processes 26. The mediation role of women of Casamance 27. La Plateforme des Femmes pour la Paix en Casamance (PFPC) 28. Senegambia Forum 29. Breaking down barriers and strengthening support across women throughout Senegal 30. Recommendations for a definitive & sustainable peace in Casamance 34. Bibliography 35. Annexes 49. Endnotes Acronyms & Abbreviations AFUDES Association of United Brothers for the Economic and Social Development of the Fogny ASC Sports and Cultural Association AJAEDO Association des Jeunes Agriculteurs et Éleveurs du Département d'Oussouye AJWS American Jewish World Service (NGO) ANRAC Agence nationale pour la Relance des Activités économiques en Casamance ANSD Agence Nationale de la Statistique et de la Démographie
    [Show full text]
  • Guinea-Bissau After Vieira: Challenges and Opportunities
    THE SOUTH AFRICAN INSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS 20/1999 Guinea-Bissau after Vieira: Challenges and Opportunities On 7 June 1998, an army mutiny led by former Chief of Staff, General Ansumane Mane, plunged the Republic of Guinea-Bissau into a devastating civil war. The coup aimed to oust President Joao Bernardo Vieira, who had come to power in a military coup against Luis Cabral in 1980 and had subsequently won the country's first multiparty elections in 1994. The civil war that followed Mane's mutiny changed the framework of the ongoing transformation process in the former socialist-orientated Guinea-Bissau. It also engulfed the subregion drawing Senegal, Guinea and The Gambia into the power struggle in Guinea- Bissau. In May 1999, after a peace process had already been did not install a military regime after he came to negotiated and partially implemented, Mane's forces power. With the beginning of democratic transition launched another attack on Vieira, and finally in 1990, the military lost its remaining privileges and succeeded in ousting the incumbent leader. Although became part of the marginalised population. Major this coup can be seen as a setback for peace and sections of the army started relying on proceeds from reconciliation in Guinea-Bissau, the new political illicit arms deals with the Casamance rebels and situation that resulted from Vieira's overthrow at least cannabis sales. provided a chance to end a hitherto paralysing state of 'no peace-no war' — akin to the Angolan situation The regional dimension after the Lusaka Accords. The new power G iven Mane's control over major sections of the army, constellation under Mane may well give Vieira's Vieira had to fight the rebellion with the military rather disappointing democratisation assistance of Guinea (400 soldiers) and process fresh impetus.
    [Show full text]
  • Sharing the Benefits of Large Dams in West Africa: the Case of Displaced People
    Akossombo dam ©encarta.msn.com Kossou dam ©fr.structurae.de SHARING THE BENEFITS OF LARGE DAMS IN WEST AFRICA: THE CASE OF DISPLACED PEOPLE Kaléta site ©OMVG Niger basin ©Wetlands international Draft Final report February 2009 Drafted by Mrs Mame Dagou DIOP, PhD & Cheikh Mamina DIEDHIOU With the collaboration of : Dr Madiodio Niasse This report has been authored by Mrs Mame Dagou DIOP, PhD and Cheikh Mamina DIEDHIOU, Environmental consultants in Senegal; Water Management and Environment Email : [email protected] , [email protected] Tel : + 221 77 635 91 85 With the collaboration of : Dr Madiodio Niasse, Secretary General of the International Land Coalition Disclaimer The views expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the organizations participating in GWI at national, regional or global level, or those of the Howard G. Buffett Foundation. The Global Water Initiative (GWI), supported by the Howard G. Buffett Foundation, addresses the challenge of providing long term access to clean water and sanitation, as well as protecting and managing ecosystem services and watersheds, for the poorest and most vulnerable people dependant on those services. Water provision under GWI takes place in the context of securing the resource base and developing new or improved approaches to water management, and forms part of a larger framework for addressing poverty, power and inequalities that particularly affect the poorest populations. This means combining a practical focus on water and sanitation delivery with investments targeted at strengthening institutions, raising awareness and developing effective policies. The Regional GWI consortium for West Africa includes the following Partners: - International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) - Catholic Relief Services (CRS) - CARE International - SOS Sahel (UK) - International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED) GWI West Africa covers 5 countries : Senegal, Ghana, Burkina Faso, Mali, and Niger .
    [Show full text]
  • The Slow Death of Slavery in Nineteenth Century Senegal and the Gold Coast
    That Most Perfidious Institution: The slow death of slavery in nineteenth century Senegal and the Gold Coast Trevor Russell Getz Submitted for the degree of PhD University of London, School or Oriental and African Studies ProQuest Number: 10673252 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 10673252 Published by ProQuest LLC(2017). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 Abstract That Most Perfidious Institution is a study of Africans - slaves and slave owners - and their central roles in both the expansion of slavery in the early nineteenth century and attempts to reform servile relationships in the late nineteenth century. The pivotal place of Africans can be seen in the interaction between indigenous slave-owning elites (aristocrats and urban Euro-African merchants), local European administrators, and slaves themselves. My approach to this problematic is both chronologically and geographically comparative. The central comparison between Senegal and the Gold Coast contrasts the varying impact of colonial policies, integration into the trans-Atlantic economy; and, more importantly, the continuity of indigenous institutions and the transformative agency of indigenous actors.
    [Show full text]
  • Senegal and Mali 9
    Senegal and Mali 9 MACARTAN HUMPHREYS and HABAYE AG MOHAMED n mid-December 1983, hundreds of demonstrators—armed with spears, machetes, and hunting rifles, covered in protective charms, and chanting Iincantations to render them invulnerable to bullets—invaded the streets of Ziguinchor to call for the independence of a region in the southwest corner of Senegal—the Casamance.1 The government responded with a heavy hand, leaving an official toll of 80 injured and 29 dead.2 A handful of those retreating, led by vet- erans from the Senegalese army, under the banner of the Mouvement des Forces Démocratiques de Casamance (MFDC), headed to the mangroves and dense forest of lower Casamance to set up rebel bases.They started military training and planning attacks on government positions.In doing so,they began a guerrilla war that has left thousands killed and the south of Senegal strewn with land mines.After 20 years of failed negotiations and aborted attempts at achieving military victory,no end to the war is in sight. The civil war in Mali started very differently.On the morning of June 28, 1990, a small group of Libyan-trained fighters belonging to the Mouvement Populaire de Libération de l’Azawad (MPLA), also hoping to gain independence for their region, Azawad, attacked a small government position in Tideremen in the far northeast of Mali.They killed four and gained control of a dozen automatic rifles.Moving south- west,the group attacked more government positions that same evening.In an attack at the town of Méneka, they seized 124 automatic rifles.These attacks were the beginning of a war that would engulf the region in intercommunal conflict, pitting northern “whites” against northern “blacks.”After extensive and broad-based nego- tiations, the war ended with a weapons-burning ceremony in 1996.
    [Show full text]
  • SENEGAL Last Updated: 2007-05-22
    Vitamin and Mineral Nutrition Information System (VMNIS) WHO Global Database on Iodine Deficiency The database on iodine deficiency includes data by country on goitre prevalence and/or urinary iodine concentration SENEGAL Last Updated: 2007-05-22 Goitre Urinary iodine (µg/L) Notes prevalence (%) Distribution (%) Prevalence (%) Age Sample Grade Grade TGP <20 20-49 50-99100-299 >300 <100 Median Mean SD Reference General Line Level Date Region and sample descriptor Sex (years) size 1 2 D 2003 Véligara department: SAC by area: Urban B 6.00 - 12.99 65 53.8 12.7 5128 * Véligara department: SAC by area: Rural B 6.00 - 12.99 84 40.5 25.4 Vélingara department: SAC by area: Urban B 6.00 - 12.99 677 2.2 * Vélingara department: SAC by area: Rural B 6.00 - 12.99 878 1.2 Vélingara department: Women by area: Urban F NS 358 5.3 Vélingara department: Women by area: Rural F NS 306 4.2 Vélingara department: PW by area: Urban F NS 46 13.0 Vélingara department: PW by area: Rural F NS 61 11.5 L 1999P Casamance area: 6 villages: All B 5.00 - 60.99 109 97.0 20.0 1563 * 1 Casamance area: 6 villages: All B 5.00 - 60.99 160 30.0 10.6 40.6 * L 1997 Bambey, Kebemer and Koungheul: SAC B 6.00 - 12.99 400 15.0 28.0 38.0 81.0 5129 * S 1995 -1997 Tambacounda and Casamance regions: All: Total B 10.00 - 50.99 8797 21.5 24.5 18.3 64.4 5282 * Tambacounda and Casamance regions: PW F NS 462 50.0 All by region: Tambacounda urban B 10.00 - 50.99 866 17.7 25.1 24.2 67.0 61.1 All by region: Tambacounda rural B 10.00 - 50.99 793 43.6 37.2 12.8 93.6 23.0 All by department: Bakel B
    [Show full text]
  • World Directory of Minorities
    World Directory of Minorities Africa MRG Directory –> Senegal –> Diola (Jola) Print Page Close Window Diola (Jola) Profile Casamance is a small area between Gambia and Guinea-Bissau. It comprises Ziguinchor and Kolda, two of the country's eight administrative regions, and is almost completely separated from the state by Gambia. The majority ethnic group in Casamance is Diola (Jola), although they make up only around four per cent of Senegal's total population. There are also significant Diola populations in The Gambia and Guinea-Bissau. Traditionally farmers, especially rice cultivators, and traders, there has been an increasing tendency for Diola youth to migrate, at least seasonally, to urban centres. Many Diola practice traditional beliefs, while others are Christians and a smaller number are Muslim. Christians and Muslims often mix those rites with traditional beliefs. Historical context Many Diola sold into slavery in the 17th century century were taken to Britain's American colonies, where they were prized for their rice-growing skills. During and since the colonial period, Diola traditional culture and beliefs were eroded by Islam, Christianity and Western education. Casamance was part of the Gambia River complex and in 1889 was arbitrarily separated from Gambia. During the colonial and early independence period it was a distant and neglected region, and under pressure from Wolof cultural dominance in Senegal. Several movements for the independence of Casamance from Senegal developed in the late 1960s and 1970s. A few separatist groups emerged in the early 1980s, spurred on by new government policies that transferred some traditional lands of subsistence farmers in Casamance to northern Muslims of Wolof, Serer or Peuhl ethnicity for use in growing cash crops.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Agriculture in Senegal: Comparing the Effects of Intercropping and Mulching on Millet Yields
    Conservation agriculture in Senegal: comparing the effects of intercropping and mulching on millet yields Patrick J. Trail Thesis submitted to the faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science In Crop & Soil Environmental Sciences A. Ozzie Abaye, Chair Thomas L. Thompson Wade E. Thomason January 30th, 2015 Blacksburg, Virginia Keywords: Sahel, Senegal, Millet, Cowpea, Mungbean, Intercropping, Mulch, Conservation Agriculture Copyright 2015, Patrick J. Trail Conservation agriculture in Senegal: comparing the effects of intercropping and mulching on millet yields Patrick J. Trail Abstract Situated on the western edge of Africa’s harsh Sahel region, Senegal faces a number of agricultural production constraints. Limited rainfall, poor soil fertility, and insufficient agronomic inputs all contribute to low yielding millet production systems. This study was initiated to assess the potential for intercropping either cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) or mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek) into traditional pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.) cropping systems. During the 2013 and 2014 growing seasons two varieties of cowpea (upright and viney), and one variety of mungbean (upright) were grown in monoculture and subsequently intercropped with millet to evaluate the potential for increasing millet and overall yields. Millet was also planted with a mulch (2 t/ha of neem leaves) to test the effectiveness of increased ground cover on millet yields. In addition to yield data, soil moisture and plant NDVI data were also collected. Millet grain yields increased when intercropped with either cowpea or mungbean compared to millet that was grown alone, with grain yield increases of up to 55%.
    [Show full text]
  • Creating Markets in Senegal
    CREATING MARKETS SENEGAL IN CREATING A COUNTRY PRIVATE SECTOR DIAGNOSTIC SECTOR PRIVATE COUNTRY A A COUNTRY PRIVATE SECTOR DIAGNOSTIC CREATING MARKETS IN SENEGAL Sustaining growth in an uncertain environment APRIL 2020 About IFC IFC—a sister organization of the World Bank and member of the World Bank Group—is the largest global development institution focused on the private sector in emerging markets. We work with more than 2,000 businesses worldwide, using our capital, expertise, and influence to create markets and opportunities in the toughest areas of the world. In fiscal year 2018, we delivered more than $23 billion in long-term financing for developing countries, leveraging the power of the private sector to end extreme poverty and boost shared prosperity. For more information, visit www.ifc.org © International Finance Corporation 2020. All rights reserved. 2121 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20433 www.ifc.org The material in this report was prepared in consultation with government officials and the private sector in Senegal and is copyrighted. Copying and/or transmitting portions or all of this work without permission may be a violation of applicable law. IFC does not guarantee the accuracy, reliability or completeness of the content included in this work, or for the conclusions or judgments described herein, and accepts no responsibility or liability for any omissions or errors (including, without limitation, typographical errors and technical errors) in the content whatsoever or for reliance thereon. The findings, interpretations, views, and conclusions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Executive Directors of the International Finance Corporation or of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (the World Bank) or the governments they represent.
    [Show full text]
  • Senegal Grain and Feed Annual 2018 West Africa Rice Annual
    THIS REPORT CONTAINS ASSESSMENTS OF COMMODITY AND TRADE ISSUES MADE BY USDA STAFF AND NOT NECESSARILY STATEMENTS OF OFFICIAL U.S. GOVERNMENT POLICY Required Report - public distribution Date: 4/19/2018 GAIN Report Number: Senegal Grain and Feed Annual 2018 West Africa Rice Annual Approved By: Joshua Lagos Prepared By: Jasmine Osinski Fana Sylla Report Highlights: Marketing year (MY) 2018/19 total area and rice production for Burkina Faso, Guinea, Mali, and Senegal is forecast at 2.4 million HA and 4.2 million MT assuming good weather and continued subsidized inputs that may influence planting decisions. MY 2018/19 total imports for all the aforementioned countries are estimated to increase approximately 14.5 percent to 3.375 million MT on steady demand and expectations of competitive international prices. This annual report primarily focuses on providing an overview of Senegal; it includes an abridged analysis for Mali, Burkina Faso, and Guinea. Page 2 of 18 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Executive Summary II. Senegal 3 Production 3 Rice Milling and Processing 6 Prices 7 Rice Seed Research and Seed Multiplication 8 Consumption 9 Trade 10 Stocks 10 Policy 10 Marketing 14 III. Mali, Burkina Faso, and Guinea 14 Mali 14 Production 14 Consumption 14 Trade 14 Burkina Faso 15 Production 15 Consumption 15 Trade 15 Guinea 15 Production 16 Consumption 16 Trade 16 IV.- Production, Supply and Demand Data Statistics 17 Page 3 of 18 I. Executive Summary Marketing year (MY) 2018/19 total area and rice production for Burkina Faso, Guinea, Mali, and Senegal is forecast at 2.4 million hectares (HA) and 4.2 million MT assuming good weather and continued subsidized inputs that may influence planting decisions.
    [Show full text]
  • Demographics of Senegal: Ethnicity and Religion (By Region and Department in %)
    Appendix 1 Demographics of Senegal: Ethnicity and Religion (By Region and Department in %) ETHNICITY Wolof Pulaar Jola Serer Mandinka Other NATIONAL 42.7 23.7 5.3 14.9 4.2 13.4 Diourbel: 66.7 6.9 0.2 24.8 0.2 1.2 Mbacke 84.9 8.4 0.1 8.4 0.1 1.1 Bambey 57.3 2.9 0.1 38.9 0.1 0.7 Diourbel 53.4 9.4 0.4 34.4 0.5 1.9 Saint-Louis: 30.1 61.3 0.3 0.7 0.0 7.6 Matam 3.9 88.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 8.0 Podor 5.5 89.8 0.3 0.3 0.0 4.1 Dagana 63.6 25.3 0.7 1.3 0.0 10.4 Ziguinchor: 10.4 15.1 35.5 4.5 13.7 20.8 Ziguinchor 8.2 13.5 34.5 3.4 14.4 26.0 Bignona 1.8 5.2 80.6 1.2 6.1 5.1 Oussouye 4.8 4.7 82.4 3.5 1.5 3.1 Dakar 53.8 18.5 4.7 11.6 2.8 8.6 Fatick 29.9 9.2 0.0 55.1 2.1 3.7 Kaolack 62.4 19.3 0.0 11.8 0.5 6.0 Kolda 3.4 49.5 5.9 0.0 23.6 17.6 Louga 70.1 25.3 0.0 1.2 0.0 3.4 Tamba 8.8 46.4 0.0 3.0 17.4 24.4 Thies 54.0 10.9 0.7 30.2 0.9 3.3 Continued 232 Appendix 1 Appendix 1 (continued) RELIGION Tijan Murid Khadir Other Christian Traditional Muslim NATIONAL 47.4 30.1 10.9 5.4 4.3 1.9 Diourbel: 9.5 85.3 0.0 4.1 0.0 0.3 Mbacke 4.3 91.6 3.7 0.0 0.0 0.2 Bambey 9.8 85.6 2.9 0.6 0.7 0.4 Diourbel 16.0 77.2 4.6 0.7 1.2 0.3 Saint-Louis: 80.2 6.4 8.4 3.7 0.4 0.9 Matam 88.6 2.3 3.0 4.7 0.3 1.0 Podor 93.8 1.9 2.4 0.8 0.0 1.0 Dagana 66.2 11.9 15.8 0.9 0.8 1.1 Ziguinchor: 22.9 4.0 32.0 16.3 17.1 7.7 Ziguinchor 31.2 5.0 17.6 16.2 24.2 5.8 Bignona 17.0 3.3 51.2 18.5 8.2 1.8 Oussouye 14.6 2.5 3.3 6.1 27.7 45.8 Dakar 51.5 23.4 6.9 10.9 6.7 0.7 Fatick 39.6 38.6 12.4 1.2 7.8 0.5 Kaolack 65.3 27.2 4.9 0.9 1.0 0.6 Kolda 52.7 3.6 26.0 11.1 5.0 1.6 Louga 37.3 45.9 15.1 1.2 0.1 0.5 Source:
    [Show full text]