DOCSLIB.ORG

Revision Draft

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Revision Draft MRAG-MSC-F13-v1.1 March 2019 8950 Martin Luther King Jr. Street N. #202 St. Petersburg, Florida 33702-2211 Tel: (727) 563-9070 Fax: (727) 563-0207 Email: [email protected] President: Andrew A. Rosenberg, Ph.D. Announcement Comment Draft Report Vyvenskoe LLC, RA Belorechensk LLC Karaginsky Bay Salmon Fisheries Conformity Assessment Body (CAB) MRAG Americas, Inc. Raymond Beamesderfer, Dmitry Lajus, Amanda Stern- Assessment team Pirlot Fishery client Vyvenskoe Ltd, Belorechensk Ltd Assessment Type Initial Assessment 1 MRAG Americas – Vyvenskoe, Belorechensk Karaginsky Bay Salmon Fisheries MRAG-MSC-F13-v1.1 March 2019 Document Control Record Document Draft Submitted By Date Reviewed By Date ACDR DL,RB 4/30/19 ASP, MC 5/1/19 MRAG Americas – Vyvenskoe, Belorechensk Karaginsky Bay Salmon Fisheries 2 MRAG-MSC-F13-v1.1 March 2019 1. Executive summary .........................................................................................5 2. Report details ..................................................................................................6 2.1. Authorship and peer review details ......................................................................... 6 2.2. Version details ........................................................................................................... 6 3. Unit(s) of Assessment and Certification and results overview ..................7 3.1. Unit(s) of Assessment and Unit(s) of Certification ................................................ 7 3.1.1. Scope of assessment in relation to enhanced or introduced fisheries ............ 9 3.2. Assessment results overview .................................................................................. 9 3.2.1. Determination, formal conclusion and agreement ........................................... 9 3.2.2. Principle level scores ....................................................................................... 9 3.2.3. Summary of conditions .................................................................................... 9 3.2.4. Recommendations ........................................................................................... 9 4. Traceability and eligibility ........................................................................... 10 4.1. Eligibility date .......................................................................................................... 10 4.2. Traceability within the fishery ................................................................................ 10 4.3. Eligibility to enter further chains of custody ........................................................ 12 4.4. Eligibility of Inseparable or Practicably Inseparable (IPI) stock(s) ..................... 12 5. Scoring .......................................................................................................... 13 5.1. Summary of Performance Indicator level scores ................................................. 13 5.2. Principle 1 ................................................................................................................ 21 5.2.1. Principle 1 background .................................................................................. 21 Overview of the fishery ............................................................................................................ 21 Pink Salmon .............................................................................................................................. 33 Chum Salmon ........................................................................................................................... 39 Sockeye Salmon........................................................................................................................ 43 5.2.2. Catch ............................................................................................................. 46 5.2.3. Principle 1 Performance Indicator scores and rationales .............................. 48 PI 1.1.1 – Stock status .............................................................................................................. 48 PI 1.1.2 – Stock rebuilding ........................................................................................................ 51 PI 1.2.1 – Harvest strategy ....................................................................................................... 54 PI 1.2.2 – Harvest control rules and tools ................................................................................ 58 PI 1.2.3 – Information and monitoring ..................................................................................... 62 PI 1.2.4 – Assessment of stock status ....................................................................................... 64 PI 1.3.1 – Enhancement outcomes ........................................................................................... 71 PI 1.3.2 – Enhancement management ..................................................................................... 72 PI 1.3.3 – Enhancement information ....................................................................................... 73 5.3. Principle 2 ................................................................................................................ 75 5.3.1. Principle 2 background .................................................................................. 75 Primary Species ........................................................................................................................ 75 Secondary Species .................................................................................................................... 82 ETP Species ............................................................................................................................... 85 Habitats.................................................................................................................................... 87 Ecosystem Structure and Function ........................................................................................... 88 5.3.2. Principle 2 Performance Indicator scores and rationales .............................. 90 PI 2.1.1 – Primary species outcome ......................................................................................... 90 PI 2.1.2 – Primary species management strategy .................................................................... 91 MRAG Americas – Vyvenskoe, Belorechensk Karaginsky Bay Salmon Fisheries 3 MRAG-MSC-F13-v1.1 March 2019 PI 2.1.3 – Primary species information..................................................................................... 94 PI 2.2.1 – Secondary species outcome ..................................................................................... 95 PI 2.2.2 – Secondary species management strategy ................................................................ 97 PI 2.2.3 – Secondary species information ................................................................................. 99 PI 2.3.1 – ETP species outcome .............................................................................................. 101 PI 2.3.2 – ETP species management strategy ........................................................................ 103 PI 2.3.3 – ETP species information ......................................................................................... 106 PI 2.4.1 – Habitats outcome ................................................................................................... 108 PI 2.4.2 – Habitats management strategy ............................................................................. 110 PI 2.4.3 – Habitats information .............................................................................................. 112 PI 2.5.1 – Ecosystem outcome ................................................................................................ 114 PI 2.5.2 – Ecosystem management ........................................................................................ 116 PI 2.5.3 – Ecosystem information ........................................................................................... 118 5.4. Principle 3 .............................................................................................................. 122 5.4.1. Principle 3 background ................................................................................ 122 Legal & Customary Framework .............................................................................................. 122 Management Structure - Consultation, Roles & Responsibilities ........................................... 123 Fishery Objectives and Measures ........................................................................................... 127 In-season process ................................................................................................................... 130 Enforcement ........................................................................................................................... 132 Protected, Endangered, or Threatened Species ..................................................................... 134 Research plan ......................................................................................................................... 135 International Management ................................................................................................... 136 5.4.2. Principle 3 Performance Indicator scores and rationales ............................ 137 PI 3.1.1 – Legal and/or
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Виктор Гаврилюк (1928–2005) И Его Вклад В Исследование Чукотки Viktor Gavrilyuk (1928–2005) and His Input in the Study of Chukotka
    Растительность России. СПб., 2018. Vegetation of Russia. St. Petersburg, 2018. № 34. С. 147–153. N 34. P. 147–153. https://doi.org/10.31111/vegrus/2018.34.147 ИсторИя наукИ Виктор ГаВрилюк (1928–2005) и его вклад в исследоВание Чукотки VIKTOR GAVRILYUK (1928–2005) AND HIS INPUT IN THE STUDY OF CHUKOTKA © О. В. СВистун¹, Г. А. Чорна², т. В. МаМЧур¹, М. И. Парубок¹ O. V. SVYSTUN, G. A. CHORNA, T. V. MAMCHUR, M. I. PARUBOK ¹Уманский национальный университет садоводства. 20300, Украина, Умань, ул. Интернациональная, 1. Uman National University of Horticulture (Uman city, Ukraine) E-mail: [email protected] ²Уманский государственный педагогический университет им. Павла Тычины. 20300, Украина, Умань, ул. Садовая, 2. Uman State Pedagogical University named after Pavlo Tychyna (Uman city, Ukraine) «…Впереди природа — с которой я никогда не расстанусь; впереди леса, поля — дорогие и милые места; впереди — мои любимые цветы; впереди много людей — моих товарищей… …O, Erd, o, Sonne, o, Glück, o, Lust¹!» Из «Дневника записей событий, в жизни моих происхоящих». В. А. Гаврилюк Начало ХХІ столетия ознаменовалось в ботанической науке под- ведением итогов ряда исследований. Современники по достоинству оценивают труды предшественников, с особым почтением отдавая должное тем ученым-натуралистам, которые по крупицам добыва- ли сведения о растительном мире суровых краев (Полежаев, Череш- нев, 2008; Матвеева, 2014; Мамчур и др., 2017). Итоги изучения растительного покрова Крайнего Севера, в том числе и Чукотки, сотрудниками Ботанического института им. В. Л. Комарова РАН были подведены Надеждой Васильевной Мат- веевой (2014). Она поименно вспомнила более 130 человек, кото- рые в той или иной степени связали свою жизнь с Арктикой. Есть в этом списке и имя Виктора Антоновича Гаврилюка, скромного уманского ботаника, впоследствии подготовившего не одно поколе- ние агрономов для ряда регионов бывшего Советского Союза.
    [Show full text]
  • Registered in the Ministry of Justice on February 9, 2015 Under No. 35949
    Registered in the Ministry of Justice on February 9, 2015 under No. 35949 MINISTRY OF TRANSPORT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION ORDER dated January 19, 2015 No. 4 ABOUT APPROVAL OF MANDATORY REGULATIONS AT THE SEAPORT OF PETROPAVLOVSK-KAMCHATSKY In accordance with Article 14 of the Federal Law dated 8 November 2007 No. 261-ФЗ "On seaports in the Russian Federation and on amending certain legislative acts of the Russian Federation" (Corpus of legislative acts of the Russian Federation, 2007 No. 46 art. 5557; 2008 No. 29 (p. I) art. 3418, No. 30 (p. II) art. 3616; 2009 No. 52 (p. I) art. 6427; 2010 No. 19 art. 2291, No. 48 art. 6246; 2011 No. 1 art. 3, No. 13 art. 1688, No. 17 art. 2313, No. 30 (p. I) art. 4590, art. 4594; 2012 No. 26 art. 3446; 2013 No. 27 art. 3477, No. 30 (part I) art. 4058; 2014 No. 45 art. 6143) I hereby order: To approve enclosed Mandatory Regulations for the seaport of Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky. Minister M.Yu.SOKOLOV Approved by the Order of the Ministry of Transportation of Russia No. 4 dated January 19, 2015 MANDATORY REGULATIONS AT THE SEAPORT OF PETROPAVLOVSK-KAMCHATSKY I. General provisions 1. The Mandatory Regulations at the seaport of Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky (hereinafter – Mandatory Regulations) have been developed according to the Federal Law dated November 8, 2007 No. 261-ФЗ "On seaports in the Russian Federation and on amending certain legislative acts of the Russian Federation"1, the Federal Law dated April 30, 1999 No. 81-ФЗ "The Merchant shipping Code of the Russian Federation"2, General Rules of ships’ navigation and mooring at the seaports of the Russian Federation and in approaches thereto3 (hereinafter – General rules).
    [Show full text]
  • Pliocene Wood of Larix from Southern Primorye (Russian Far East) O
    ISSN 0031-0301, Paleontological Journal, 2007, Vol. 41, No. 11, pp. 1054–1062. © Pleiades Publishing, Ltd., 2007. Pliocene Wood of Larix from Southern Primorye (Russian Far East) O. V. Bondarenko Institute of Biology and Soil Science, Far East Division, Russian Academy of Sciences, pr. Stoletiya Vladivostoka 159, Vladivostok, 690022 Russia e-mail: [email protected] Received December 19, 2007 Abstract—A new fossil larch species, Laricioxylon blokhinae, showing the wood anatomy of modern Larix olgensis A. Henry and L. leptolepis (Siebold et Succ.) Gord. is described. The taxonomic and structural diver- sity of larch species is reviewed, based on fossil wood remains from the Pliocene of southern Primorye. DOI: 10.1134/S0031030107110044 Key words: Larix, Pinaceae, wood anatomy, Pliocene, southern Primorye. INTRODUCTION Eastern Division of the Russian Academy of Sciences), collection IBSS, no. 20a. Fossil wood is often the only paleobotanical macro- In view of the heterogeneous nature of wood anat- fossil known from the Pliocene of the Russian Far East, omy, entailed by diverse functions of the tissue, the since remains of leaves and reproductive structures are anatomical sections were made in three mutually per- not usually preserved in the coarse alluvial deposits of pendicular planes (transverse, radial, and tangential). this age. We used the technique of preparing sections of fossil- At present, a single, but extremely rich locality for ized wood that was slightly carbonized and fossilized Pliocene wood is known in southern Primorye: Pav- (Gammerman et al., 1946). After preliminary treatment lovka lignite field. It is restricted to the Pavlovka group of the wood specimens (softening and consolidation), of depressions, situated 35 km northeast of the town of transparent thin sections were produced by hand, using Ussuriisk.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia (Eastern)
    ■ RUSSIA (EASTERN) RAMSAR CONVENTION CAME INTO FORCE 1977 RAMSAR DESIGNATION IS: NUMBER OF RAMSAR SITES DESIGNATED (at 31 August 2005) 14 in the Asia region Complete in 7 IBAs AREA OF RAMSAR SITES DESIGNATED (at 31August 2005) 5,270,000 ha in the Asia region Partial in 7 IBAs ADMINISTRATIVE AUTHORITY FOR RAMSAR CONVENTION Lacking in 118 IBAs Department of International Cooperation, Ministry of Natural Resources The extensive tundra, taiga and steppe wetlands in eastern Russia in the tundra support large flocks of moulting waterfowl in late (east of the Yenisey River) support huge numbers of wetland- summer. dependent birds, many of which migrate along the East Asian- The Russian Federation joined the Ramsar Convention as Australasian flyway to wintering grounds in East Asia, South- part of the former Soviet Union in 1977, and to date has East Asia or Australasia. Eastern Russia supports the entire (or designated 34 Ramsar Sites. Fourteen of these Ramsar Sites, all virtually the entire) breeding populations of the threatened Baikal of which overlap with IBAs, are in eastern Russia (east of the Teal Anas formosa, Steller’s Sea-eagle Haliaeetus pelagicus, Yenisey River), and an additional 118 potential Ramsar Sites Siberian Crane Grus leucogeranus, Hooded Crane G. monacha, have been identified in the eastern part of the country. The Spotted Greenshank Tringa guttifer and Spoon-billed Sandpiper designated and potential Ramsar Sites are particularly Eurynorhynchus pygmeus, and significant proportions of the concentrated in the following regions:
    [Show full text]
  • Russia (Eastern)
    Important Bird Areas in Asia – Russia (Eastern) ■ RUSSIA (Eastern) LAND AREA1 10,339,000 km2 HUMAN POPULATION2 16,828,000 (2 per km2) NUMBER OF IBAs 169 TOTAL AREA OF IBAs c.345,000 km2 STATUS OF IBAs 41 protected; 29 partially protected; 99 unprotected Arctic tundra in northern Russia is immensely rich in breeding waterbirds, in particular waterfowl and shorebirds, for example on Belyaka spit at the mouth of Kolyuchin bay (IBA 87). (PHOTO: MINORU KASHIWAGI) KEY HABITATS AND BIRDS • Many coastal and inland wetlands in eastern Russia support large congregations of waterbirds on passage from their • The Arctic tundra in northern Russia (Biome AS01: Arctic tundra northern breeding grounds to their wintering areas, and certain and SA 087: Chukotski peninsula) is immensely rich in breeding wetlands in the tundra support large flocks of moulting waterbirds, in particular waterfowl and shorebirds, most of which waterfowl in late summer. The coastal wetlands around the Sea migrate to other parts of Asia and to Australasia outside the of Okhotsk and the northern Sea of Japan are the only breeding breeding season. Many waterbird species nest only in the tundra grounds of the threatened Steller’s Sea-eagle Haliaeetus pelagicus zone (and its interface with the taiga zone), including the and Spotted Greenshank Tringa guttifer, and the lower Amur threatened Lesser White-fronted Goose Anser erythropus, Red- and Ussuri floodplains in south-east Russia are important breasted Goose Branta ruficollis, Siberian Crane Grus leucogeranus breeding grounds for the threatened Oriental Stork Ciconia and Spoon-billed Sandpiper Eurynorhynchus pygmeus. boyciana, Baer’s Pochard Aythya baeri, Red-crowned Crane • The vast expanse of coniferous taiga forest (and associated Grus japonensis and probably Swinhoe’s Rail Coturnicops wetlands) that extends across Eastern Siberia, and the temperate exquisitus.
    [Show full text]
  • Kolkhoz Udarnik Pacific Salmon in Karaginsky Gulf, Karaga Bay and Litke Strait
    Marine Stewardship Council fisheries assessments UCSL – United Certification Systems Limited Office 003, Pamelva Court, 1 Anastasi Shoukri Street, 3035, Limassol, Cyprus Mobile phone: +7-960-242-4845 Kolkhoz Udarnik Pacific Salmon in Karaginsky Gulf, Karaga Bay and Litke Strait Photo by provided by the client: Kolkhoz “Udarnik" LLC, 2021 Announcement Comment Draft Report Conformity Assessment Body UCSL United Certification Systems Limited (CAB) Assessment team Dr. Petr Vasilets, Dr. Mohamed Samy-Kamal Kolkhoz Udarnik LLC – Kolkhoz “Udarnik” Limited Liability Company Fishery client (Russian Federation) Assessment type Initial Assessment Date March 2021 UCSL United Certification Systems Limited: Kolkhoz Udarnik Pacific Salmon in Karaginsky Gulf, Karaga Bay and Litke Strait ACDR 1 Contents 1 Contents ................................................................................................................................ 2 Table of Tables ................................................................................................................................ 5 Table of Figures ............................................................................................................................... 7 2 Glossary .............................................................................................................................. 10 3 Executive summary ............................................................................................................. 12 4 Report details .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • To a Species Composition of Subfamily Moelleriinae Hickman Et Mclean, 1990 (Mollusca: Gastropoda: Colloniidae) in the Northwestern Pacific
    Ruthenica, 2018, vol. 28, No. 1: 19-25. © Ruthenica, 2018 Published online March 2, 1018. http: www.ruthenica.com To a species composition of subfamily Moelleriinae Hickman et McLean, 1990 (Mollusca: Gastropoda: Colloniidae) in the northwestern Pacific B.I. SIRENKO1, A.V. MERKULIEV1, E.N. KROL2, 3, D.D. DANILIN4, I.O. NEKHAEV5 1 Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya Emb. 1, 199034, St. Petersburg, RUSSIA. E-mail: [email protected] 2 Research laboratory “Monitoring and conversation of natural Arctic ecosystems”, Murmansk Arctic State University, Kommuny Str. 9, 183038, Murmansk, RUSSIA. E-mail: [email protected] 3 Department of Biology, Murmansk State Technical University, Sportivnaya Str. 13, 183010 Murmansk, RUSSIA. 4 Kamchatka Branch of Pacific Geographical Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Naberedzhnaya Str. 18, 683000, Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky, RUSSIA. E-mail: [email protected] 5 Laboratory of Macroecology and Biogeography of Invertebrates, Saint-Petersburg State University, Universitetskaya Emb. 7-9, 199034, Saint-Petersburg, RUSSIA. E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT. Two species of the subfamily Moellerii- moelleria Baxter et McLean, 1984 differ from nae Hickman et McLean, 1990 – Moelleria costulata Homalopoma in its having an operculum with a (Møller, 1842) and Spiromoelleria quadrae (Dall, 1897) multispiral pattern on its exterior surface, and hav- – have been reported from the northwestern Pacific so ing the operculum unable to retract deeper than far. The present paper clarifies their distribution in the flush with the apertural margin [Baxter, McLean, region based on the museum collections and newly 1984] (compare Figs 1 A, E and Figs 2 A-B). In obtained material from the northwestern Pacific.
    [Show full text]
  • From the Upper Cretaceous of the Zeya Bureya Basin
    ISSN 00310301, Paleontological Journal, 2010, Vol. 44, No. 10, pp. 1231–1239. © Pleiades Publishing, Ltd., 2010 Fossil Wood of Sequoioxylon burejense sp. nov. (Taxodiaceae) from the Upper Cretaceous of the ZeyaBureya Basin (Russian Far East) N. I. Blokhinaa, M. A. Afonina, and T.M. Kodrulb aInstitute of Biology and Soil Science, Far East Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, pr. Stoletiya Vladivostoka 159, Vladivostok, 690022 Russia email: [email protected] bGeological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Pyzhevsky lane 7, Moscow 119017 Russia Received February 2, 2009 Abstract—A new species Sequoioxylon burejense Blokhina et M. Afonin (Taxodiaceae), identified on the basis of anatomical features of fossil wood from the Middle Maastrichtian (Upper Cretaceous) of the Zeya Bureya Basin, Amur Region, Russian Far East, is described. The new species is characterized by mixed ana tomical features of the modern representatives of the tribe Sequoieae. Cretaceous wood of Taxodiaceae was found in the Amur Region for the first time. Key words: fossil wood, Sequoioxylon, Sequoieae, Taxodiaceae, Upper Cretaceous, ZeyaBureya Basin, Amur Region, Russia. DOI: 10.1134/S0031030110100011 INTRODUCTION Cretaceous deposits, and Cupressinoxylon jiayinense Wang, Wang et Chen (Wang et al., 1996), Piceoxylon This paper presents the first investigation of fossil manchuricum Sze (Sze, 1951), Protopiceoxylon amu woods from the Cretaceous of Amur Region. Until rense Du, Xenoxylon latiporosum (Cramer) Gothan now, fossil woods were studied only from the Cenozoic (Du, 1982), and Taxodioxylon cryptomerioides Schön deposits of the area. Piceoxylon sp. (cf. Picea obovata feld (Wang et al., 1997) were described from the Upper Ledeb.), Blokh. et Snezhk., Laricioxylon priamurensis Cretaceous deposits. and Populoxylon priamurensis Blokh.
    [Show full text]
  • Alaska Sea Otter Research Workshop : Addressing the Decline of the Southwestern Alaska Sea Otter Population / Edited by Daniela Maldini … [Et
    Elmer E. Rasmuson Library Cataloging in Publication Data Alaska sea otter research workshop : addressing the decline of the Southwestern Alaska sea otter population / edited by Daniela Maldini … [et. al]. – Fairbanks : Alaska. Alaska Sea Grant College Program, University of Alaska Fairbanks 2004. p. : ill. ; cm. – (Alaska Sea Grant College Program, University of Alaska Fair- banks ; AK-SG-04-03) Includes bibliographical references and index. Notes: Held “5-7 April 2004, Alaska SeaLife Center, Seward, Alaska, USA.” 1. Sea otter—Population viability analysis—Alaska—Congresses. 2. Sea otter—Conservation—Alaska—Congresses. 3. Sea otter—Effect of predation on—Alaska—Congresses. 4. Sea otter—Geographical distribution—Congresses. 5. Sea otter—Alaska—Mortality—Congresses. 6. Sea otter—Alaska—Reproduction. 7. Sea otter—Effect of pollution on—Alaska—Congresses. 8. Sea otter—Diseas- es—Alaska—Congresses. 9. Sea otter—Predators of—Alaska—Congresses. 10. Sea otter—Research—Congresses. I. Title. II. Maldini, Daniela, 1963–. Series: Alaska Sea Grant College Program report ; AK-SG-04-03. QL737.C25 A43 2004 ISBN 1-56612-088-8 doi:10.4027/asorw.2004 Credits The Alaska SeaLife Center helped fund the publishing of this book through a grant received from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Publisher is the Alaska Sea Grant College Program, supported by the U.S. Department of Commerce, NOAA National Sea Grant Office, grant NA16RG2321, project A/161-01; and by the University of Alaska Fairbanks with state funds. The University of Alaska is an affirmative action/equal opportunity employer and educational institution. Sea Grant is a unique partnership with public and private sectors combining research, education, and technology transfer for public service.
    [Show full text]
  • Revision Draft
    MRAG-MSC-F13-v1.1 April 2020 8950 Martin Luther King Jr. Street N. #202 St. Petersburg, Florida 33702-2211 Tel: (727) 563-9070 Fax: (727) 563-0207 Email: [email protected] President: Andrew A. Rosenberg, Ph.D. Karaginsky Bay Salmon Fisheries Kolkhoz im Bekereva, Ukinskij Liman, Belorechensk & Vyvenskoe Public Certification Report Originally published 1 July 2020 Version 2 with minor amendments published 22 October 2020 Conformity Assessment Body (CAB) MRAG Americas Amanda Stern-Pirlot, Raymond Beamesderfer, Dmitry Assessment team Lajus Kolkhoz im. Bekereva JSC, Ukinskij Liman LLC, Fishery client Vyvenskoe Ltd, Belorechensk Ltd Assessment Type Initial Assessment MRAG Americas – Kolkhoz Bekereva, Ukinskij Liman, Vyvenskoe, & Belorechensk Karaginsky Bay Salmon Fisheries PCR 1 MRAG-MSC-F13-v1.1 April 2020 Document Control Record Document Draft Submitted By Date Reviewed By Date ACDR DL, RB 4/30/19 ASP, MC 5/1/19 CDR/PRDR RB, DL, ASP 2 Jan 20 ASP 15 Jan 20 PCDR RB, DL, ASP 14 April 2020 ASP 14 April 2020 FRD RB, DL, ASP 3 June 2020 EW 8 June 2020 PCR RB, DL, ASP 29 June 2020 ASP 30 June 2020 PCR v2 RB, DL, ASP 20 Oct 2020 ASP 20 Oct 2020 MRAG Americas – Kolkhoz Bekereva, Ukinskij Liman, Vyvenskoe, & Belorechensk Karaginsky Bay Salmon Fisheries PCR 2 MRAG-MSC-F13-v1.1 April 2020 1 Executive summary ................................................................................................. 5 2 Report details ........................................................................................................... 6 2.1 Authorship and peer review details ............................................................................. 6 3 Unit(s) of Assessment and Certification and results overview ........................... 7 3.1 Unit(s) of Assessment and Unit(s) of Certification ..................................................... 7 3.1.1 Scope of assessment in relation to enhanced or introduced fisheries ..................
    [Show full text]
  • Olume 38 • No 4 • 2016
    DUTCH BIRDINGVOLUME 38 • NO 4 • 2016 Dutch Birding Dutch Birding HOO F D R EDACTEU R Arnoud van den Berg (06-54270796, [email protected]) ADJUNCT HOO F D R EDACTEU R Enno Ebels (030-2961335, [email protected]) UITVOE R END R EDACTEU R André van Loon (020-6997585, [email protected]) FOTOG R A F ISCH R EDACTEU R René Pop (06-22396323, [email protected]) REDACTIE R AAD Peter Adriaens, Sander Bot, Thijs Fijen, Łukasz Ławicki, Gert Ottens, Roy Slaterus, Roland van der Vliet en Peter de Vries REDACTIE -ADVIES R AAD Peter Barthel, Mark Constantine, Andrea Corso, Dick Forsman, Ricard Gutiérrez, Killian Mullarney, Klaus Malling Olsen, Magnus Robb, Hadoram Shirihai en Lars Svensson REDACTIEMEDEWE R KE R S Garry Bakker, Harvey van Diek, Nils van Duivendijk, Steve Geelhoed, Marcel Internationaal tijdschrift over Haas, Jan van der Laan, Hans van der Meulen, Jelmer Poelstra, Martijn Renders, Kees Roselaar, Palearctische vogels Vincent van der Spek en Jan Hein van Steenis LAY -OUT André van Loon PR ODUCTIE André van Loon en René Pop REDACTIE Dutch Birding ADVE R TENTIES Debby Doodeman, p/a Dutch Birding, Postbus 75611, 1070 AP Amsterdam Duinlustparkweg 98A [email protected] 2082 EG Santpoort-Zuid ABONNEMENTEN De abonnementsprijs voor 2016 bedraagt: EUR 39.50 (Nederland en België), EUR Nederland 40.00 (rest van Europa) en EUR 43.00 (landen buiten Europa). [email protected] U kunt zich abonneren door het overmaken van de abonnementsprijs op bankrekening (IBAN): NL95 INGB 0000 1506 97; BIC: INGBNL2A ten name van Dutch Birding Association te Amsterdam, FOTO R EDACTIE ovv ‘abonnement Dutch Birding’ en uw postadres.
    [Show full text]
  • GIPE-012736-Contents.Pdf
    SOVIET TRADE FROM THE PAC I F IC TO THE LEVANT '''WITH AN ECONOMIC STUDY OF THE SOVIET '. FAR EASTERN REGION ~t¥ '--', :;S4.SSDkI7lL t, qS J '.". .., ..~ .\1~'1~.~/' BY ~V;IOLET, __ -1 CONOLLY.. HIS work continues and concludes Tthe author's intensh'e study of Soviet Russia's economic relations with Eastern countries. The first ~volume dl~ssed the question In connection With Turkey, Persia, Afghanistan, ChineseTurklstan, Outer Mongolia, and Tana Tu~. Here the scene shifts to the seaboard of AsIa and the development of Soviet trade With Japan, China, the PaclficTroplcs. India. Arabia, Palestine, Syria, and Egypt. This exhaustive examination of. Russo-Japanese economic relations I. especially Interesting In view of the attention now concentrated on Far Eastern politics. \ 1.r1;'(., Price 10s.6d. net ~ ~ Dbananjayanu> Gtdgil Libmry I IIIDlIIII~IBUmmllll ;. GIPE-PUNE-Ol,2736 ~. SOVIET TRADE· FROM THE PACIFIC TO THE LEVANT SOVIET TRADE FROM THE PACIFIC TO THE LEVANT WITH AJ{ ECONOMIC STUDI' OF THE SOVIET FAR EASTERN REGION By VIOLET CONOLLY Author of Soviel &s~ PDli", in 1M East OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS LONDON: HUMPHREY MILFORD 1935 OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS AJmIf HOO'SE B.c. .. I.ondcn. EdIn_t G_ NewYorkTorontolfdJoume Capetown Bombay.......... CaJcutta HUMPHREY..- HILYORD 7VBL,aSBII TO 'l'B& UW'VSII.SITY X '.54 .S?:.OR.\l , I FOREWORD THIS book is the continuation and conclusion of a study ~ of Soviet economic relations with Eastern countries pub­ Iishedin 1933, which dea1twith thesubjec~insofar asTurkey, Persia. Mghanistan, Chinese Turkistan, Mongolia. and Tanna Tuva are concerned. Here the same theme is discussed in connexion with China proper and Manchuria, Japan, the Chinese Eastern R.ailway, India.
    [Show full text]