DOCSLIB.ORG

Revision Draft

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Revision Draft MRAG-MSC-F13-v1.1 April 2020 8950 Martin Luther King Jr. Street N. #202 St. Petersburg, Florida 33702-2211 Tel: (727) 563-9070 Fax: (727) 563-0207 Email: [email protected] President: Andrew A. Rosenberg, Ph.D. Karaginsky Bay Salmon Fisheries Kolkhoz im Bekereva, Ukinskij Liman, Belorechensk & Vyvenskoe Public Certification Report 1 July 2020 Conformity Assessment Body (CAB) MRAG Americas Amanda Stern-Pirlot, Raymond Beamesderfer, Dmitry Assessment team Lajus Kolkhoz im. Bekereva JSC, Ukinskij Liman LLC, Fishery client Vyvenskoe Ltd, Belorechensk Ltd Assessment Type Initial Assessment MRAG Americas – Kolkhoz Bekereva, Ukinskij Liman, Vyvenskoe, & Belorechensk Karaginsky Bay Salmon Fisheries PCR 1 MRAG-MSC-F13-v1.1 April 2020 Document Control Record Document Draft Submitted By Date Reviewed By Date ACDR DL, RB 4/30/19 ASP, MC 5/1/19 CDR/PRDR RB, DL, ASP 2 Jan 20 ASP 15 Jan 20 PCDR RB, DL, ASP 14 April 2020 ASP 14 April 2020 FRD RB, DL, ASP 3 June 2020 EW 8 June 2020 PCR RB, DL, ASP 29 June 2020 ASP 30 June 2020 MRAG Americas – Kolkhoz Bekereva, Ukinskij Liman, Vyvenskoe, & Belorechensk Karaginsky Bay Salmon Fisheries PCR 2 MRAG-MSC-F13-v1.1 April 2020 1 Executive summary ................................................................................................. 5 2 Report details ........................................................................................................... 6 2.1 Authorship and peer review details ............................................................................. 6 3 Unit(s) of Assessment and Certification and results overview ........................... 7 3.1 Unit(s) of Assessment and Unit(s) of Certification ..................................................... 7 3.1.1 Scope of assessment in relation to enhanced or introduced fisheries ................... 10 3.2 Assessment results overview..................................................................................... 10 3.2.1 Determination, formal conclusion and agreement ................................................. 10 3.2.2 Principle level scores ............................................................................................ 10 3.2.3 Summary of conditions ......................................................................................... 10 3.2.4 Recommendations ............................................................................................... 11 4 Traceability and eligibility ..................................................................................... 11 4.1 Eligibility date .............................................................................................................. 11 4.2 Traceability within the fishery .................................................................................... 11 4.3 Eligibility to enter further chains of custody ............................................................. 14 4.4 Eligibility of Inseparable or Practicably Inseparable (IPI) stock(s) .......................... 14 5 Scoring ................................................................................................................... 15 5.1 Summary of Performance Indicator level scores ...................................................... 15 5.2 Principle 1 ....................................................................................................................16 5.2.1 Principle 1 background ......................................................................................... 16 Overview of the fishery ........................................................................................................ 16 Pink Salmon ......................................................................................................................... 45 Chum Salmon ....................................................................................................................... 54 5.2.2 Catch ...................................................................................................................63 5.2.3 Principle 1 Performance Indicator scores and rationales ...................................... 66 PI 1.1.1 – Stock status .......................................................................................................... 66 PI 1.1.2 – Stock rebuilding ................................................................................................... 71 PI 1.2.1 – Harvest strategy .................................................................................................. 73 PI 1.2.2 – Harvest control rules and tools ............................................................................ 78 PI 1.2.3 – Information and monitoring ................................................................................ 81 PI 1.2.4 – Assessment of stock status .................................................................................. 84 PI 1.3.1 – Enhancement outcomes ...................................................................................... 88 PI 1.3.2 – Enhancement management ................................................................................ 90 PI 1.3.3 – Enhancement information ................................................................................... 91 5.3 Principle 2 ....................................................................................................................93 5.3.1 Principle 2 background ......................................................................................... 93 Primary Species .................................................................................................................... 93 Secondary Species .............................................................................................................. 109 ETP Species ........................................................................................................................ 110 Habitats ............................................................................................................................. 113 Ecosystem Structure and Function .................................................................................... 116 MRAG Americas – Kolkhoz Bekereva, Ukinskij Liman, Vyvenskoe, & Belorechensk Karaginsky Bay Salmon Fisheries PCR 3 MRAG-MSC-F13-v1.1 April 2020 5.3.2 Principle 2 Performance Indicator scores and rationales .................................... 119 PI 2.1.1 – Primary species outcome ................................................................................... 119 PI 2.1.2 – Primary species management strategy ............................................................. 121 PI 2.1.3 – Primary species information .............................................................................. 123 PI 2.2.1 – Secondary species outcome ............................................................................... 125 PI 2.2.2 – Secondary species management strategy ......................................................... 127 PI 2.2.3 – Secondary species information .......................................................................... 130 PI 2.3.1 – ETP species outcome .......................................................................................... 132 PI 2.3.2 – ETP species management strategy .................................................................... 134 PI 2.3.3 – ETP species information ..................................................................................... 137 PI 2.4.1 – Habitats outcome .............................................................................................. 139 PI 2.4.2 – Habitats management ....................................................................................... 141 PI 2.4.3 – Habitats information ......................................................................................... 143 PI 2.5.1 – Ecosystem outcome ........................................................................................... 145 PI 2.5.2 – Ecosystem management .................................................................................... 147 PI 2.5.3 – Ecosystem information ...................................................................................... 149 5.4 Principle 3 .................................................................................................................. 153 5.4.1 Principle 3 background ....................................................................................... 153 Legal & Customary Framework ......................................................................................... 153 Management Structure - Consultation, Roles & Responsibilities ...................................... 154 Fishery Objectives & Measures .......................................................................................... 160 Enforcement ...................................................................................................................... 163 International Management ............................................................................................... 165 5.4.2 Principle 3 Performance Indicator scores and rationales .................................... 167 PI 3.1.1 – Legal and/or customary framework .................................................................. 167 PI 3.1.2 – Consultation, roles and responsibilities ............................................................. 170 PI 3.1.3 – Long term objectives .........................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Виктор Гаврилюк (1928–2005) И Его Вклад В Исследование Чукотки Viktor Gavrilyuk (1928–2005) and His Input in the Study of Chukotka
    Растительность России. СПб., 2018. Vegetation of Russia. St. Petersburg, 2018. № 34. С. 147–153. N 34. P. 147–153. https://doi.org/10.31111/vegrus/2018.34.147 ИсторИя наукИ Виктор ГаВрилюк (1928–2005) и его вклад в исследоВание Чукотки VIKTOR GAVRILYUK (1928–2005) AND HIS INPUT IN THE STUDY OF CHUKOTKA © О. В. СВистун¹, Г. А. Чорна², т. В. МаМЧур¹, М. И. Парубок¹ O. V. SVYSTUN, G. A. CHORNA, T. V. MAMCHUR, M. I. PARUBOK ¹Уманский национальный университет садоводства. 20300, Украина, Умань, ул. Интернациональная, 1. Uman National University of Horticulture (Uman city, Ukraine) E-mail: [email protected] ²Уманский государственный педагогический университет им. Павла Тычины. 20300, Украина, Умань, ул. Садовая, 2. Uman State Pedagogical University named after Pavlo Tychyna (Uman city, Ukraine) «…Впереди природа — с которой я никогда не расстанусь; впереди леса, поля — дорогие и милые места; впереди — мои любимые цветы; впереди много людей — моих товарищей… …O, Erd, o, Sonne, o, Glück, o, Lust¹!» Из «Дневника записей событий, в жизни моих происхоящих». В. А. Гаврилюк Начало ХХІ столетия ознаменовалось в ботанической науке под- ведением итогов ряда исследований. Современники по достоинству оценивают труды предшественников, с особым почтением отдавая должное тем ученым-натуралистам, которые по крупицам добыва- ли сведения о растительном мире суровых краев (Полежаев, Череш- нев, 2008; Матвеева, 2014; Мамчур и др., 2017). Итоги изучения растительного покрова Крайнего Севера, в том числе и Чукотки, сотрудниками Ботанического института им. В. Л. Комарова РАН были подведены Надеждой Васильевной Мат- веевой (2014). Она поименно вспомнила более 130 человек, кото- рые в той или иной степени связали свою жизнь с Арктикой. Есть в этом списке и имя Виктора Антоновича Гаврилюка, скромного уманского ботаника, впоследствии подготовившего не одно поколе- ние агрономов для ряда регионов бывшего Советского Союза.
    [Show full text]
  • Registered in the Ministry of Justice on February 9, 2015 Under No. 35949
    Registered in the Ministry of Justice on February 9, 2015 under No. 35949 MINISTRY OF TRANSPORT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION ORDER dated January 19, 2015 No. 4 ABOUT APPROVAL OF MANDATORY REGULATIONS AT THE SEAPORT OF PETROPAVLOVSK-KAMCHATSKY In accordance with Article 14 of the Federal Law dated 8 November 2007 No. 261-ФЗ "On seaports in the Russian Federation and on amending certain legislative acts of the Russian Federation" (Corpus of legislative acts of the Russian Federation, 2007 No. 46 art. 5557; 2008 No. 29 (p. I) art. 3418, No. 30 (p. II) art. 3616; 2009 No. 52 (p. I) art. 6427; 2010 No. 19 art. 2291, No. 48 art. 6246; 2011 No. 1 art. 3, No. 13 art. 1688, No. 17 art. 2313, No. 30 (p. I) art. 4590, art. 4594; 2012 No. 26 art. 3446; 2013 No. 27 art. 3477, No. 30 (part I) art. 4058; 2014 No. 45 art. 6143) I hereby order: To approve enclosed Mandatory Regulations for the seaport of Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky. Minister M.Yu.SOKOLOV Approved by the Order of the Ministry of Transportation of Russia No. 4 dated January 19, 2015 MANDATORY REGULATIONS AT THE SEAPORT OF PETROPAVLOVSK-KAMCHATSKY I. General provisions 1. The Mandatory Regulations at the seaport of Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky (hereinafter – Mandatory Regulations) have been developed according to the Federal Law dated November 8, 2007 No. 261-ФЗ "On seaports in the Russian Federation and on amending certain legislative acts of the Russian Federation"1, the Federal Law dated April 30, 1999 No. 81-ФЗ "The Merchant shipping Code of the Russian Federation"2, General Rules of ships’ navigation and mooring at the seaports of the Russian Federation and in approaches thereto3 (hereinafter – General rules).
    [Show full text]
  • Part I - Updated Estimate Of
    Part I - Updated Estimate of Fair Market Value of the S.S. Keewatin in September 2018 05 October 2018 Part I INDEX PART I S.S. KEEWATIN – ESTIMATE OF FAIR MARKET VALUE SEPTEMBER 2018 SCHEDULE A – UPDATED MUSEUM SHIPS SCHEDULE B – UPDATED COMPASS MARITIME SERVICES DESKTOP VALUATION CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE C – UPDATED VALUATION REPORT ON MACHINERY, EQUIPMENT AND RELATED ASSETS SCHEDULE D – LETTER FROM BELLEHOLME MANAGEMENT INC. PART II S.S. KEEWATIN – ESTIMATE OF FAIR MARKET VALUE NOVEMBER 2017 SCHEDULE 1 – SHIPS LAUNCHED IN 1907 SCHEDULE 2 – MUSEUM SHIPS APPENDIX 1 – JUSTIFICATION FOR OUTSTANDING SIGNIFICANCE & NATIONAL IMPORTANCE OF S.S. KEEWATIN 1907 APPENDIX 2 – THE NORTH AMERICAN MARINE, INC. REPORT OF INSPECTION APPENDIX 3 – COMPASS MARITIME SERVICES INDEPENDENT VALUATION REPORT APPENDIX 4 – CULTURAL PERSONAL PROPERTY VALUATION REPORT APPENDIX 5 – BELLEHOME MANAGEMENT INC. 5 October 2018 The RJ and Diane Peterson Keewatin Foundation 311 Talbot Street PO Box 189 Port McNicoll, ON L0K 1R0 Ladies & Gentlemen We are pleased to enclose an Updated Valuation Report, setting out, at September 2018, our Estimate of Fair Market Value of the Museum Ship S.S. Keewatin, which its owner, Skyline (Port McNicoll) Development Inc., intends to donate to the RJ and Diane Peterson Keewatin Foundation (the “Foundation”). It is prepared to accompany an application by the Foundation for the Canadian Cultural Property Export Review Board. This Updated Valuation Report, for the reasons set out in it, estimates the Fair Market Value of a proposed donation of the S.S. Keewatin to the Foundation at FORTY-EIGHT MILLION FOUR HUNDRED AND SEVENTY-FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($48,475,000) and the effective date is the date of this Report.
    [Show full text]
  • Deep-Sea Life Issue 16, January 2021 Cruise News Sedimentation Effects Survey Series (ROBES III) Completed
    Deep-Sea Life Issue 16, January 2021 Despite the calamity caused by the global pandemic, we are pleased to report that our deep ocean continues to be investigated at an impressive rate. Deep-Sea Life 16 is another bumper issue, brimming with newly published research, project news, cruise news, scientist profiles and so on. Even though DOSI produce a weekly Deep-Sea Round Up newsletter and DOSI and DSBS are active on social media, there’s still plenty of breaking news for Deep- Sea Life! Firstly a quick update on the status of INDEEP. As most of you are aware, INDEEP was a legacy programme of the Census of Marine Life (2000-2010) and was established to address knowledge gaps in deep-sea ecology. Among other things, the INDEEP project played central role in the creation of the Deep-Ocean Stewardship Initiative and funded initial DOSI activities. In 2018, the DOSI Decade of Ocean Science working group was established with a view to identifying key priorities for deep-ocean science to support sustainable development and to ensure deep- ocean ecological studies were included in the UN Decade plans via truly global collaborative science. This has resulted in an exciting new initiative called “Challenger 150”. You are all invited to learn more about this during a webinar on 9th Feb (see p. 22 ). INDEEP has passed on the baton and has now officially closed its doors.Eva and I want to sincerely thank all those that led INDEEP with us and engaged in any of the many INDEEP actions. It was a productive programme that has left a strong legacy.
    [Show full text]
  • Murina Galina-Vanzetti Vasiliyevna
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by A.O. Kovalevsky Institute of Marine Biological Research... National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine A.O. Kovalevsky Institute of Biology of the Southern Seas BIOBIBLIOGRAPHIC INDEX OF SCIENTISTS OF UKRAINE MURINA GALINA-VANZETTI VASILIYEVNA Biobibliographic profile Sevastopol 2012 UDC 016:574/587 M 91 Compiled by G. F. Guseva Murina Galina-Vanzetti Vasiliyevna: biobibliographic profile / M 91 compiled by G. F. Guseva; revised and translated into English by O.V. Klimentova. - Sevastopol, 2012. - 46 pp. - (Biobibliographic index of scientists of Ukraine). This issue is a humble contribution to celebration of the 85th birthday of Galina-Vanzetti V. Murina, D.Sc. (Biol.), Professor, the recognized authority in the taxonomy and zoogeography of mariculture organisms and meroplankton. For sev- eral decades Dr. G.-V.V. Murina has been a leading scientific worker at the Depart- ment of Mariculture and Applied Oceanology in the Institute of Biology of the South- ern Seas, the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. The key points of her biog- raphy and scientific advancement are presented. This publication is intended for biologists, oceanologists, zoologists, ecolo- gists, post graduates, university students and for any interested reader. UDC 016:574/587 © A.O. Kovalevsky Institute of Biology of the Southern Seas Natl. Ac. Sci. of Ukraine, 2012 Foreword This bio-bibliographic profile was intended to highlight key points in the biography and bright scientific life of Galina-Vanzetti V. Murina, D.Sc. (Biol.), Professor. The acknowledged expert in the taxonomy and zoogeog- raphy of marine invertebrates, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Pliocene Wood of Larix from Southern Primorye (Russian Far East) O
    ISSN 0031-0301, Paleontological Journal, 2007, Vol. 41, No. 11, pp. 1054–1062. © Pleiades Publishing, Ltd., 2007. Pliocene Wood of Larix from Southern Primorye (Russian Far East) O. V. Bondarenko Institute of Biology and Soil Science, Far East Division, Russian Academy of Sciences, pr. Stoletiya Vladivostoka 159, Vladivostok, 690022 Russia e-mail: [email protected] Received December 19, 2007 Abstract—A new fossil larch species, Laricioxylon blokhinae, showing the wood anatomy of modern Larix olgensis A. Henry and L. leptolepis (Siebold et Succ.) Gord. is described. The taxonomic and structural diver- sity of larch species is reviewed, based on fossil wood remains from the Pliocene of southern Primorye. DOI: 10.1134/S0031030107110044 Key words: Larix, Pinaceae, wood anatomy, Pliocene, southern Primorye. INTRODUCTION Eastern Division of the Russian Academy of Sciences), collection IBSS, no. 20a. Fossil wood is often the only paleobotanical macro- In view of the heterogeneous nature of wood anat- fossil known from the Pliocene of the Russian Far East, omy, entailed by diverse functions of the tissue, the since remains of leaves and reproductive structures are anatomical sections were made in three mutually per- not usually preserved in the coarse alluvial deposits of pendicular planes (transverse, radial, and tangential). this age. We used the technique of preparing sections of fossil- At present, a single, but extremely rich locality for ized wood that was slightly carbonized and fossilized Pliocene wood is known in southern Primorye: Pav- (Gammerman et al., 1946). After preliminary treatment lovka lignite field. It is restricted to the Pavlovka group of the wood specimens (softening and consolidation), of depressions, situated 35 km northeast of the town of transparent thin sections were produced by hand, using Ussuriisk.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia (Eastern)
    ■ RUSSIA (EASTERN) RAMSAR CONVENTION CAME INTO FORCE 1977 RAMSAR DESIGNATION IS: NUMBER OF RAMSAR SITES DESIGNATED (at 31 August 2005) 14 in the Asia region Complete in 7 IBAs AREA OF RAMSAR SITES DESIGNATED (at 31August 2005) 5,270,000 ha in the Asia region Partial in 7 IBAs ADMINISTRATIVE AUTHORITY FOR RAMSAR CONVENTION Lacking in 118 IBAs Department of International Cooperation, Ministry of Natural Resources The extensive tundra, taiga and steppe wetlands in eastern Russia in the tundra support large flocks of moulting waterfowl in late (east of the Yenisey River) support huge numbers of wetland- summer. dependent birds, many of which migrate along the East Asian- The Russian Federation joined the Ramsar Convention as Australasian flyway to wintering grounds in East Asia, South- part of the former Soviet Union in 1977, and to date has East Asia or Australasia. Eastern Russia supports the entire (or designated 34 Ramsar Sites. Fourteen of these Ramsar Sites, all virtually the entire) breeding populations of the threatened Baikal of which overlap with IBAs, are in eastern Russia (east of the Teal Anas formosa, Steller’s Sea-eagle Haliaeetus pelagicus, Yenisey River), and an additional 118 potential Ramsar Sites Siberian Crane Grus leucogeranus, Hooded Crane G. monacha, have been identified in the eastern part of the country. The Spotted Greenshank Tringa guttifer and Spoon-billed Sandpiper designated and potential Ramsar Sites are particularly Eurynorhynchus pygmeus, and significant proportions of the concentrated in the following regions:
    [Show full text]
  • Ggeebibcm08.Pdf
    Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission Reports of Meetings of Experts and Equivalent Bodies IOC Editorial Board for the International Bathymetric Chart of the Mediterranean and its Geological/Geophysical Series Eighth Session World Ocean Museum, on board RV Vityaz Kaliningrad, Russian Federation 1-4 September 1999 UNESCO Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission Reports of Meetings of Experts and Equivalent Bodies IOC Editorial Board for the International Bathymetric Chart of the Mediterranean and its Geological/Geophysical Series Eighth Session World Ocean Museum, on board RV Vityaz Kaliningrad, Russian Federation 1-4 September 1999 UNESCO IOC/EB-IBCM-VIII/3 Paris, 10 March 2000 English only IOC/EB-IBCM-VIII/3 page (i) TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1. OPENING 1 2. ADMINISTRATIVE ARRANGEMENTS FOR THE SESSION 1 2.1 ADOPTION OF THE PROVISIONAL AGENDA 1 2.2 DESIGNATION OF THE RAPPORTEUR 1 2.3 CONDUCT OF THE SESSION, TIMETABLE AND DOCUMENTATION 1 2.4 ELECTION OF THE VICE-CHAIRMAN 1 3. EXPLANATORY BROCHURES-LEAFLETS FOR THE IBCM GEOLOGICAL/GEOPHYSICAL SERIES 2 3.1 ELECTRONIC PUBLISHING VIA THE INTERNET 2 3.2 BATHYMETRY 2 3.3 IBCM-G (GRAVITY) 2 3.4 IBCM-PQ (PLIO-QUATERNARY SEDIMENT THICKNESS) 3.5 IBCM-S (SEISMICITY) - PREPARATION OF THE SEISMICITY CATALOGUE 2 3.6 IBCM-SED (RECENT SEDIMENTS) 3 3.7 IBCM-M (MAGNETIC ANOMALIES) 3 3.8 GENERAL DISTRIBUTION OF THE BROCHURES 3 4. COMPLETION OF THE GEOLOGICAL-GEOPHYSICAL SERIES 3 4.1 IBCM-M (MAGNETIC ANOMALIES) – 1:1M 3 4.2 IBCM-M (MAGNETIC ANOMALIES) – 1:5M 3 4.3 DIGITIZATION OF THE GEOLOGICAL-GEOPHYSICAL SERIES 4 5. SECOND EDITION OF IBCM 4 6.
    [Show full text]
  • RV Sonne SO-250 Cruise Report / Fahrtbericht Tomakomai - Yokohama (Japan) 16.08.-26.09.2016
    RV Sonne SO-250 Cruise Report / Fahrtbericht Tomakomai - Yokohama (Japan) 16.08.-26.09.2016 SO-250 KuramBio II (Kuril Kamchatka Biodiversity Studies) Angelika Brandt University of Hamburg, Centre of Natural History (CeNak), Zoological Museum Hamburg and shipboard scientific party 1 TOC / Inhaltsverzeichnis 1. Cruise summary / Zusammenfassung ................................................................................................... 6 German / Deutsch ......................................................................................................................... 6 English / Englisch ........................................................................................................................... 6 2. Participants / Teilnehmer ...................................................................................................................... 8 Principal investigators / Leitende Wissenschaftler ....................................................................... 8 Scientific party / wissenschaftliche Fahrtteilnehmer .................................................................... 8 Crew / Mannschaft ...................................................................................................................... 12 3. Narrative of the cruise / Ablauf der Forschungsfahrt ......................................................................... 13 4. Aims of the Cruise / Zielsetzung der Forschungsfahrt ........................................................................ 15 5. Agenda of the cruise
    [Show full text]
  • Revision Draft
    MRAG-MSC-F13-v1.1 March 2019 8950 Martin Luther King Jr. Street N. #202 St. Petersburg, Florida 33702-2211 Tel: (727) 563-9070 Fax: (727) 563-0207 Email: [email protected] President: Andrew A. Rosenberg, Ph.D. Announcement Comment Draft Report Vyvenskoe LLC, RA Belorechensk LLC Karaginsky Bay Salmon Fisheries Conformity Assessment Body (CAB) MRAG Americas, Inc. Raymond Beamesderfer, Dmitry Lajus, Amanda Stern- Assessment team Pirlot Fishery client Vyvenskoe Ltd, Belorechensk Ltd Assessment Type Initial Assessment 1 MRAG Americas – Vyvenskoe, Belorechensk Karaginsky Bay Salmon Fisheries MRAG-MSC-F13-v1.1 March 2019 Document Control Record Document Draft Submitted By Date Reviewed By Date ACDR DL,RB 4/30/19 ASP, MC 5/1/19 MRAG Americas – Vyvenskoe, Belorechensk Karaginsky Bay Salmon Fisheries 2 MRAG-MSC-F13-v1.1 March 2019 1. Executive summary .........................................................................................5 2. Report details ..................................................................................................6 2.1. Authorship and peer review details ......................................................................... 6 2.2. Version details ........................................................................................................... 6 3. Unit(s) of Assessment and Certification and results overview ..................7 3.1. Unit(s) of Assessment and Unit(s) of Certification ................................................ 7 3.1.1. Scope of assessment in relation to enhanced
    [Show full text]
  • Russia (Eastern)
    Important Bird Areas in Asia – Russia (Eastern) ■ RUSSIA (Eastern) LAND AREA1 10,339,000 km2 HUMAN POPULATION2 16,828,000 (2 per km2) NUMBER OF IBAs 169 TOTAL AREA OF IBAs c.345,000 km2 STATUS OF IBAs 41 protected; 29 partially protected; 99 unprotected Arctic tundra in northern Russia is immensely rich in breeding waterbirds, in particular waterfowl and shorebirds, for example on Belyaka spit at the mouth of Kolyuchin bay (IBA 87). (PHOTO: MINORU KASHIWAGI) KEY HABITATS AND BIRDS • Many coastal and inland wetlands in eastern Russia support large congregations of waterbirds on passage from their • The Arctic tundra in northern Russia (Biome AS01: Arctic tundra northern breeding grounds to their wintering areas, and certain and SA 087: Chukotski peninsula) is immensely rich in breeding wetlands in the tundra support large flocks of moulting waterbirds, in particular waterfowl and shorebirds, most of which waterfowl in late summer. The coastal wetlands around the Sea migrate to other parts of Asia and to Australasia outside the of Okhotsk and the northern Sea of Japan are the only breeding breeding season. Many waterbird species nest only in the tundra grounds of the threatened Steller’s Sea-eagle Haliaeetus pelagicus zone (and its interface with the taiga zone), including the and Spotted Greenshank Tringa guttifer, and the lower Amur threatened Lesser White-fronted Goose Anser erythropus, Red- and Ussuri floodplains in south-east Russia are important breasted Goose Branta ruficollis, Siberian Crane Grus leucogeranus breeding grounds for the threatened Oriental Stork Ciconia and Spoon-billed Sandpiper Eurynorhynchus pygmeus. boyciana, Baer’s Pochard Aythya baeri, Red-crowned Crane • The vast expanse of coniferous taiga forest (and associated Grus japonensis and probably Swinhoe’s Rail Coturnicops wetlands) that extends across Eastern Siberia, and the temperate exquisitus.
    [Show full text]
  • Kolkhoz Udarnik Pacific Salmon in Karaginsky Gulf, Karaga Bay and Litke Strait
    Marine Stewardship Council fisheries assessments UCSL – United Certification Systems Limited Office 003, Pamelva Court, 1 Anastasi Shoukri Street, 3035, Limassol, Cyprus Mobile phone: +7-960-242-4845 Kolkhoz Udarnik Pacific Salmon in Karaginsky Gulf, Karaga Bay and Litke Strait Photo by provided by the client: Kolkhoz “Udarnik" LLC, 2021 Announcement Comment Draft Report Conformity Assessment Body UCSL United Certification Systems Limited (CAB) Assessment team Dr. Petr Vasilets, Dr. Mohamed Samy-Kamal Kolkhoz Udarnik LLC – Kolkhoz “Udarnik” Limited Liability Company Fishery client (Russian Federation) Assessment type Initial Assessment Date March 2021 UCSL United Certification Systems Limited: Kolkhoz Udarnik Pacific Salmon in Karaginsky Gulf, Karaga Bay and Litke Strait ACDR 1 Contents 1 Contents ................................................................................................................................ 2 Table of Tables ................................................................................................................................ 5 Table of Figures ............................................................................................................................... 7 2 Glossary .............................................................................................................................. 10 3 Executive summary ............................................................................................................. 12 4 Report details .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]