DOCSLIB.ORG

1. Min Aung Hlaing and the Generals Staged a Coup Against Myanmar's Demo

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1. Min Aung Hlaing and the Generals Staged a Coup Against Myanmar's Demo Que: 1. Why did the military coup in Myanmar occur? An: 1. Min Aung Hlaing and the generals staged a coup against Myanmar's democratically elected civilian government and declared State of Emergency because of alleged 2020 voting problem issues. Queue 2. How long is the military rule in Myanmar likely to last? Ans: 2. Military Junta has failed to protect its citizens, it has forced Myanmar into a failed State and it will help the Military to step down when the UN security Council consider responsibility to protect a failed state Myanmar. Military regime always ruled Myanmar with 2008 Military controlled Myanmar constitution, isolated the citizens and favoured enormous power to the military regime. The 25% of Army personnel sat in the Parliament house since the coup in 1962 by General Ne Win made the civilian government to democratically control and rule Myanmar. Que: 7. What can or should Australia do to support the return to stability and democracy? Ans: 7. Australian government can take a lead in working out and resolving the complex issues, putting more pressures to the UN general secretary and the international governments to take urgent steps and support Myanmar’s plight. Barbara Taylor, Senior Social Worker, Member of Amnesty International Australia Statement to the Australian Government International countries has misread the Myanmar military regime’s brutally controlling Myanmar with enormous military power for many years and escalating civil war (. e.g. Uprising examples in 1977, 1988, 2007 and current 2021.The military regime created brutal cold war against it’s own citizens and ethnic minorities made them prosper and resulted the civilians into deep pain, sufferings, poverty, displaced in their own country and denied their basic Human Rights for decades. The Military regime cannot rule Myanmar anymore because it has breached its own 2008 constitution. The vice president is the only person who can rule Myanmar in case of State emergency or when the country is in crisis instead the military regime staged a coup and arrested the State Counselor Aung San Suu Kyi and arbitrarily arrested the political leaders. Since the 1st of February 2021 to1 April 2021 gross violations of Human Rights and violent crackdown against the pro democracy protesters and unarmed civilians in Myanmar has claimed more than 600 deaths. Further the military dictatorship has conducted over 2000 unlawful arrests and committed untold numbers of injuries against peaceful demonstrators including local/foreign journalists and media. We condemn the violence and military repression used against the anticoup protesters and unarmed civilians in Myanmar and urge the Australian government to do the following: 1. To immediately press for the release of State Counselor Aung San Suu Kyi, president U Win Myint, political leaders, and all prisoners of conscious. 2. To call upon United Nations (UN) to intervene and stop the terrorist Myanmar military coup Min Aung Hlaing and the generals from committing further violations of human rights and crimes against humanity in the country. 3. To call up the UN Security Council to impose punitive Sanctions, including global arms embargoes against Myanmar and deny visas of Min Aung Hlaing, his generals and their families for overseas travel. 4. To press for restoration of the 2020 democratically elected government - the National League for Democracy (NLD). 5. To support the people of Myanmar to the right of peaceful protest, freedom of expression and freedom of assembly. 6. To publicly denounce the military coup Min Aung Hlaing and the generals who ruled Myanmar for more than 60 years, the military dictatorship who made themselves rich by brining the people of Myanmar into deep poverty by committing ongoing crimes against humanity and economic exploitation and causing hundreds of thousands of refugees and internally displaced people. 7. To help restore democracy and protect the basic human rights and equality of citizens by implementing a federal democratic government in Myanmar. 8. To support the committee representing Pyidaungsu Hluttaw (CRPH)& New developments. 9. To withdraw all Australian military and police training and aid to the Myanmar military dictatorship. (Evidence is based on media reports, victim testimony, their families and civilian witnesses reports via videos and photos from Myanmar such as: destructions of people's homes and livelihoods, use deadly weapons; illegal arrest with fabricated crimes; sexual violence; inhumane acts of violence; brutal killings against unarmed anti coup protesters and innocent civilians in Myanmar) .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Please Copy and Paste the Following Text Into Your E-Mail
    Please copy and paste the following text into your e-mail To: UN Human Rights Council Member States’ foreign ministers and their country missions in Geneva On 1 February, the Myanmar military seized power in a military coup d'etat and arbitrarily detained President Win Myint, State Counsellor Aung San Suu Kyi and other civilian leaders. A year-long state of emergency was declared, installing Vice-President and former lieutenant- general Myint Swe as the acting President, who immediately handed over power to commander- in-chief Senior General Min Aung Hlaing. The coup has been met with nationwide peaceful demonstrations by the people of Myanmar demanding that the Military respects the outcomes of the November 2020 elections, restores the elected civilian government and releases all those who are arbitrarily detained, and that the Military be held accountable for its atrocities. The junta has responded to these protests with systematic and violent crackdowns. The UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Myanmar has described the junta’s crackdown on peaceful protestors as crimes against humanity. Since the coup, over 755 people, including at least 43 children, women and medical workers have been killed so far in the junta’s violence. Also, over 4,496 people, including human rights defenders and journalists documenting the military’s atrocities, civil society and political activists, and civilian political leaders have been arbitrarily arrested and detained and raided their offices and homes. Whereabouts of many who have been arrested remain unknown while several others have reported torture, sexual violence and ill treatment in detention.
    [Show full text]
  • Asia Report, Nr. 27: Myanmar
    MYANMAR: THE ROLE OF CIVIL SOCIETY 6 December 2001 Asia Report N° 27 Bangkok/Brussels TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY................................................................................................................... i I. INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................1 II. BACKGROUND OF CIVIL SOCIETY IN MYANMAR........................................................3 A. AN EMERGENT CIVIL SOCIETY: 1948-1962....................................................................................... 3 B. CIVIL SOCIETY REPRESSED UNDER MILITARY RULE .......................................................................... 4 III. REGIME CONTROL OVER CIVIL SOCIETY SINCE 1988 ...............................................6 A. LACK OF THE RULE OF LAW............................................................................................................... 6 B. HIGHLY RESTRICTED ACCESS TO COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY .................................................. 8 C. INDEPENDENT ORGANISATIONS STIFLED............................................................................................ 9 D. REGIME-SPONSORED ORGANISATIONS............................................................................................. 10 E. EDUCATIONAL AND CULTURAL LIMITATIONS .................................................................................. 11 F. SIMILAR RESTRICTIONS IN AREAS CONTROLLED BY ARMED ETHNIC NATIONALIST ORGANISATIONS .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • India-Myanmar Joint Statement During State Visit of President to Myanmar (10-14 December 2018)
    Media Center Media Center India-Myanmar Joint Statement during State Visit of President to Myanmar (10-14 December 2018) December 13, 2018 1. At the invitation of the President of the Republic of the Union of Myanmar, His Excellency U Win Myint and the First Lady Daw Cho Cho, the President of the Republic of India, His Excellency Shri Ram Nath Kovind and the First Lady Smt. Savita Kovind paid a State Visit to Myanmar from 10 to 14 December 2018. The visit reinforces the tradition of high-level interaction between the leaders of the two countries in recent years. 2. A ceremonial welcome was accorded to President Kovind at the Presidential Palace in Nay Pyi Taw on 11 December, 2018. President U Win Myint and President Kovind held a bilateral meeting and President U Win Myint hosted a State Banquet for the visiting President in his honour. President Kovind also met with State Counsellor, Her Excellency Daw Aung San Suu Kyi. The discussions between the leaders were held in a cordial and constructive atmosphere that is the hallmark of the close and friendly relations between the two countries. President U Win Myint and President Kovind also witnessed the signing of MoUs between the two sides in the areas of judicial and educational cooperation. The Indian side also handed over the first 50 units of prefabricated houses built in Rakhine State under the Rakhine State Development Programme funded by the Government of India. Furthermore, both sides agreed to sign at the earliest the MoU for Cooperation on Combating Timber Trafficking and Conservation of Tigers and Other Wildlife and the MoU on Bilateral Cooperation for Prevention of Trafficking in Persons; Rescue, Recovery, Repatriation and Re-integration of Victims of Trafficking, on which negotiations are nearing completion.
    [Show full text]
  • Book of Abstracts Edition 2016 09 10
    Panels & Abstracts 16-18 SEPTEMBER 2016 SCHOOL OF ORIENTAL AND AFRICAN STUDIES, UNIVERSITY OF LONDON ASEASUK Conference 2016 Disclaimer: Panel and abstract details are current as of 9 September 2016. While every effort has been made to ensure the completeness of this information and to verify details provided, ASEASUK, SOAS, and the organisers of this conference accept no responsibility for incorrect or incomplete information. Additional updated versions of this book of abstracts will be made until mid-August 2016 at which time a final hard copy will be printed for distribution at the conference. Organizing Committee Professor Michael W. Charney (SOAS), Committee Chair Professor Ashley Thompson (SOAS) Professor Matthew Cohen (Royal Holloway) Professor Carol Tan (SOAS) Dr. Ben Murtagh (SOAS) Dr. Angela Chiu (SOAS) Ms. Jane Savory (SOAS) SOAS Conference Office Support Mr. Thomas Abbs Ms. Yasmin Jayesimi Acknowledgments The Organizing Committee would like to thank the following people for special assistance in planning this conference: Dr. Tilman Frasch (Manchester Metropolitan University), Dr. Laura Noszlopy (Royal Holloway), Dr. Carmencita Palermo (University of Naples “L'Orientale”), Dr. Nick Gray (SOAS), Dr. Atsuko Naono (Wellcome Unit for the History of Medicine, University of Oxford), Dr. Li Yi (SOAS), Dr. Thomas Richard Bruce, and the many others who lent assistance in various ways. © 2016 ASEASUK and the SOAS, the University of London 1 Contents PANEL 1 The Political Economy of Inclusion: Current Reform Challenges in Indonesia 3
    [Show full text]
  • New Crisis Brewing in Burma's Rakhine State?
    CRS INSIGHT New Crisis Brewing in Burma's Rakhine State? February 15, 2019 (IN11046) | Related Author Michael F. Martin | Michael F. Martin, Specialist in Asian Affairs ([email protected], 7-2199) Approximately 250 Chin and Rakhine refugees entered into Bangladesh's Bandarban district in the first week of February, trying to escape the fighting between Burma's military, or Tatmadaw, and one of Burma's newest ethnic armed organizations (EAOs), the Arakan Army (AA). Bangladesh's Foreign Minister Abdul Momen summoned Burma's ambassador Lwin Oo to protest the arrival of the Rakhine refugees and the military clampdown in Rakhine State. Bangladesh has reportedly closed its border to Rakhine State. U.N. Special Rapporteur on the Situation of Human Rights in Myanmar Yanghee Lee released a press statement on January 18, 2019, indicating that heavy fighting between the AA and the Tatmadaw had displaced at least 5,000 people. She also called on the Rakhine State government to reinstate the access for international humanitarian organizations. The Conflict Between the Arakan Army and the Tatmadaw The AA was formed in Kachin State in 2009, with the support of the Kachin Independence Army (KIA). In 2015, the AA moved some of its soldiers from Kachin State to southwestern Chin State, and began attacking Tatmadaw security bases in Chin State and northern Rakhine State (see Figure 1). In late 2017, the AA shifted more of its operations into northeastern Rakhine State. According to some estimates, the AA has approximately 3,000 soldiers based in Chin and Rakhine States. Figure 1. Reported Clashes between Arakan Army and Tatmadaw Source: CRS, utilizing data provided by the Armed Conflict Location and Event Data Project (ACLED).
    [Show full text]
  • Myanmar Country Report BTI 2008
    BTI 2008 | Myanmar Country Report Status Index 1-10 1.96 # 124 of 125 Democracy 1-10 1.70 # 124 of 125 Market Economy 1-10 2.21 # 122 of 125 Management Index 1-10 1.79 # 124 of 125 scale: 1 (lowest) to 10 (highest) score rank trend This report is part of the Bertelsmann Transformation Index (BTI) 2008. The BTI is a global ranking of transition processes in which the state of democracy and market economic systems as well as the quality of political management in 125 transformation and developing countries are evaluated. The BTI is a joint project of the Bertelsmann Stiftung and the Center for Applied Policy Research (C•A•P) at Munich University. More on the BTI at http://www.bertelsmann-transformation-index.de/ Please cite as follows: Bertelsmann Stiftung, BTI 2008 — Myanmar Country Report. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung, 2007. © 2007 Bertelsmann Stiftung, Gütersloh BTI 2008 | Myanmar 2 Key Indicators Population mn. 50.5 HDI 0.58 GDP p.c. $ 1,027 Pop. growth1 % p.a. 1.0 HDI rank of 177 130 Gini Index - Life expectancy years 61 UN Education Index 0.76 Poverty3 % - Urban population % 30.6 Gender equality2 - Aid per capita $ 2.9 Sources: UNDP, Human Development Report 2006 | UNDP, Human Development Index 2004 | The World Bank, World Development Indicators 2007 | OECD Development Assistance Committee 2006. Footnotes: (1) Average annual growth rate 1990-2005. (2) Gender Empowerment Measure (GEM). (3) Percentage of population living on less than $2 a day. Executive Summary During the period under review, Myanmar’s political stalemate has continued.
    [Show full text]
  • Burma Coup Watch
    This publication is produced in cooperation with Burma Human Rights Network (BHRN), Burmese Rohingya Organisation UK (BROUK), the International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH), Progressive Voice (PV), US Campaign for Burma (USCB), and Women Peace Network (WPN). BN 2021/2031: 1 Mar 2021 BURMA COUP WATCH: URGENT ACTION REQUIRED TO PREVENT DESTABILIZING VIOLENCE A month after its 1 February 2021 coup, the military junta’s escalation of disproportionate violence and terror tactics, backed by deployment of notorious military units to repress peaceful demonstrations, underlines the urgent need for substantive international action to prevent massive, destabilizing violence. The junta’s refusal to receive UN diplomatic and CONTENTS human rights missions indicates a refusal to consider a peaceful resolution to the crisis and 2 Movement calls for action confrontation sparked by the coup. 2 Coup timeline 3 Illegal even under the 2008 In order to avert worse violence and create the Constitution space for dialogue and negotiations, the 4 Information warfare movement in Burma and their allies urge that: 5 Min Aung Hlaing’s promises o International Financial Institutions (IFIs) 6 Nationwide opposition immediately freeze existing loans, recall prior 6 CDM loans and reassess the post-coup situation; 7 CRPH o Foreign states and bodies enact targeted 7 Junta’s violent crackdown sanctions on the military (Tatmadaw), 8 Brutal LIDs deployed Tatmadaw-affiliated companies and partners, 9 Ongoing armed conflict including a global arms embargo; and 10 New laws, amendments threaten human rights o The UN Security Council immediately send a 11 International condemnation delegation to prevent further violence and 12 Economy destabilized ensure the situation is peacefully resolved.
    [Show full text]
  • General Assembly Distr.: General 20 August 2001
    United Nations A/56/312 General Assembly Distr.: General 20 August 2001 Original: English Fifty-sixth session Item 131 (c) of the provisional agenda* Human rights questions: human rights situations and reports of special rapporteurs and representatives Situation of human rights in Myanmar Note by the Secretary-General** The Secretary-General has the honour to transmit to the members of the General Assembly, the interim report prepared by Paulo Sergio Pinheiro, Special Rapporteur of the Commission on Human Rights on the situation of human rights in Myanmar, in accordance with Commission resolution 2001/15 and Economic and Social Council decision 2001/251. * A/56/150. ** In accordance with General Assembly resolution 54/248, sect. C, para. 1, this report is being submitted on 20 August 2001 so as to include as much updated information as possible. 01-51752 (E) 260901 *0151752* A/56/312 Interim report of the Special Rapporteur of the Commission on Human Rights on the situation of human rights in Myanmar Summary The present report is the first report of the present Special Rapporteur, appointed to this mandate on 28 December 2000. The report refers to his activities and developments relating to the situation of human rights in Myanmar between 1 January and 14 August 2001. In view of the brevity and exploratory nature of the Special Rapporteur’s initial visit to Myanmar in April and pending a proper fact-finding mission to take place at the end of September 2001, this report addresses only a limited number of areas. In the Special Rapporteur’s assessment as presented in this report, political transition in Myanmar is a work in progress and, as in many countries, to move ahead incrementally will be a complex process.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF 892.20Kb
    Working paper Building on what’s there Insights on social protection and public goods provision from central-east Myanmar Gerard McCarthy September 2016 When citing this paper, please use the title and the following reference number: S-53308-MYA-2 Gerard McCarthy Building on What’s There: Insights on social assistance, public goods and taxation from central-east Myanmar Section 1: Introduction After decades of military rule in Myanmar, the political and economic transitions that are now underway are already impacting on the provision of social protection services and public goods at the local level.1 The progress made towards reaching cease-fires with armed groups around the country has allowed for expansion of the Myanmar government apparatus and services in some of these areas. Government expenditures on health, education, and to a lesser extent social welfare and rural development have increased substantially since 20092. Specific groups of individuals such as pregnant mothers and the elderly are now receiving assistance including direct cash transfers from state ministries, largely financed by international donors. 3 In addition, a National Social Protection Strategy is now in place. Moreover the newly elected National League for Democracy (NLD) government are planning to expand state- provided welfare, social services and other public goods.4 These are all positive developments. Often ignored in attempts to support livelihoods through state-mediated welfare initiatives, however, is Myanmar’s extensive economy of non-state welfare and public goods provisioning. Developed over decades of military rule, often with the direct encouragement of the regime itself, there are 100,000s of localized mechanisms of risk-sharing and social protection operating across Myanmar.5 However, little is known about the relative importance of these networks for households when compared to government support; the extent of the fiscal burden that falls on households; and households’ opinions on this system of care.
    [Show full text]
  • The Causes and Consequences of Recurrent
    THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO LIVING WITH VIOLENCE: THE CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES OF RECURRENT BUDDHIST-MUSLIM VIOLENCE IN MYANMAR A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE DIVISION OF THE SOCIAL SCIENCES IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIOLOGY BY NATHANIEL JAMES GONZALEZ CHICAGO, ILLINOIS AUGUST 2020 Copyright © 2020 by Nathaniel James Gonzalez All Rights Reserved TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................................ v LIST OF TABLES ......................................................................................................................... vi ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .......................................................................................................... vii ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................................. viii RECURRENT COMMUNAL VIOLENCE ................................................................................... 1 1.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Studying Recurrent Communal Violence ....................................................................... 4 1.3 Defining Communal Conflict and Communal Violence ................................................ 7 1.4 The Causes of Communal Violence ............................................................................. 16 1.5
    [Show full text]
  • Acts Adopted Under Title V of the Treaty on European Union)
    L 108/88EN Official Journal of the European Union 29.4.2005 (Acts adopted under Title V of the Treaty on European Union) COUNCIL COMMON POSITION 2005/340/CFSP of 25 April 2005 extending restrictive measures against Burma/Myanmar and amending Common Position 2004/423/CFSP THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION, (8) In the event of a substantial improvement in the overall political situation in Burma/Myanmar, the suspension of Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in these restrictive measures and a gradual resumption of particular Article 15 thereof, cooperation with Burma/Myanmar will be considered, after the Council has assessed developments. Whereas: (9) Action by the Community is needed in order to (1) On 26 April 2004, the Council adopted Common implement some of these measures, Position 2004/423/CFSP renewing restrictive measures 1 against Burma/Myanmar ( ). HAS ADOPTED THIS COMMON POSITION: (2) On 25 October 2004, the Council adopted Common Position 2004/730/CFSP on additional restrictive Article 1 measures against Burma/Myanmar and amending Annexes I and II to Common Position 2004/423/CFSP shall be Common Position 2004/423/CFSP (2). replaced by Annexes I and II to this Common Position. (3) On 21 February 2005, the Council adopted Common Position 2005/149/CFSP amending Annex II to Article 2 Common Position 2004/423/CFSP (3). Common Position 2004/423/CFSP is hereby renewed for a period of 12 months. (4) The Council would recall its position on the political situation in Burma/Myanmar and considers that recent developments do not justify suspension of the restrictive Article 3 measures.
    [Show full text]
  • Myanmar Coup: How the Military Has Held Onto Power for 60 Years
    Myanmar coup: how the military has held onto power for 60 years https://theconversation.com/myanmar-coup-how-the-military-has-held-o... Close The latest news: by experts Sign up for the newsletter Academic rigour, journalistic flair h. Myanmar coup: how the military has held onto power for 60 years February 3, 2021 3.24pm GMT The military once again hold the reins of power in Myanmar. Citing constitutional Author provisions that give the military control in national emergencies, army officers detained government leaders in the early hours of February 1 2021, including state counsellor and popular national leader Aung San Suu Kyi. Michael W. Charney An announcement on military television said the move was in response to “fraud” during Professor of Asian and Military History, last year’s general election. A spokesman said power had been handed to the army’s SOAS, University of London commander-in-chief, General Min Aung Hlaing, who would hold power for one year, after which there would be new elections. 1 of 8 03/02/2021, 15:36 Myanmar coup: how the military has held onto power for 60 years https://theconversation.com/myanmar-coup-how-the-military-has-held-o... Military control of the government is nothing new for the Burmese people. In one way or another the military has controlled the country since 1962. The post-independence civilian government got off to a bad start in 1948. In July 1947 the charismatic nationalist leader General Aung San, the father of Aung San Suu Kyi, was assassinated and leadership was inherited by the less politically agile U Nu.
    [Show full text]