LEADER Groups in Central Finland

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Contact information LLEADEREADER GGroupsroups JyväsRiihi ry toimisto@jyvasriihi.fi www.keskisuomenmaaseutu.fi /jyvasriihi iinn CCentralentral FFinlandinland Maaseudun Kehittämisyhdistys VIISARI ry www.viisaankivi.fi /viisari Viisari Pihtipudas Kinnula Kyyjärvi Kivijärvi JyväsRiihi Maaseutukehitys ry Viitasaari Maaseutukehitys ry Kannonkoski www.keskisuomenmaaseutu.fi / Karstula Saarijärvi maaseutukehitys Äänekoski Konnevesi Multia Uurainen Laukaa Hankasalmi Keuruu Petäjävesi Vesuri-ryhmä ry Jyväskylä Muurame toimisto@vesuri-ryhma.fi Toivakka Jyväskylä (Korpilahti) www.keskisuomenmaaseutu.fi / Jämsä Joutsa vesuri Luhanka Kuhmoinen Vesuri Maaseutukehitys LEADER LAGs The groups share the following goals for internationalization: to create international networking opportunities for - rural development associations small local businesses to develop the expertise of rural operators, for example, in Central Finland in producing services and making use of local resources and assets Four Local Action Groups (LAGs) operate in Central Finland: JyväsRiihi ry, Maaseudun Kehittämisyhdistys VIISARI ry, Maaseu- to promote social activities tukehitys ry and Vesuri-ryhmä ry. to provide our young people with activities and opportunities to have an infl uence on local issues The common goal of all four groups is to activate rural residents, associations, and small businesses to take initiative in developing We support inter-regional cooperation, for example, their own local areas. Our goal is to develop the functionality and in the following areas: attractiveness of rural areas as living and working environments. cooperation between urban and rural areas We promote and encourage cooperation between people and fi shing, hunting, and cultural tourism organizations. creative industries, local handicraft businesses The operating areas of these groups include sparsely populat- social entrepreneurship and providing services for ed rural communities, small rural towns, and the countryside the non-profi t sector near urban centres. Through cooperation and with the help of a diversifi ed network of developers, we are increasing the promoting entrepreneurship, e.g., introducing new effectiveness of LEADER-activities and supporting interaction procedures and ways to do things between communities and associations. making use of renewable energy.

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Toponymic Guidelines (Pdf)
UNITED NATIONS GROUP OF EXPERTS ON GEOGRAPHICAL NAMES 22nd session, New York, 20-29 April 2004 Item 17 of the provisional agenda TOPONYMIC GUIDELINES FOR MAP EDITORS AND OTHER EDITORS FINLAND Fourth, revised edition 2004* (v. 4.11, April 2021**) * Prepared by Sirkka Paikkala (Research Institute for the Languages of Finland) in collaboration with the Na- tional Land Survey of Finland (Teemu Leskinen) and the Geographical Society of Finland (Kerkko Hakulinen). The 22nd session of UNGEGN in 2004, WP 49. The first edition of this paper, Toponymic Guidelines for International Cartography - Finland, submitted by Mr. A. Rostvik, Norden Division, was presented to the Ninth session of UNGEGN 1981 (WP 37). The second version, Toponymic guidelines for cartography: Finland, prepared by the Onomastic Division of the Finnish Research Centre for Domestic Languages in collabo- ration with the Swedish Language Division and the National Board of Survey, was presented to the 4th UN Conference on the Standardization of Geographical Names in 1982 (E/CONF.74/L.41). The second edition, Toponymic Guidelines for Map an Other Editors, pre- paired by the Finnish Research Centre for Domestic Languages together with National Land Survey, was presented to the 17th session of UNGEGNUnited in 1994 (WP 63). The third edi- tion (revised version), prepared by Sirkka Paikkala in collaboration with the National Land Sur- vey of Finland and the Geographical Society of Finland, was presented to the 7th UN Conference on the Standardization of Geographical Names (New York, 13-22 January 1998, E/CONF.91/L. 17) ** Editions 4.1 - 4.6 updated by Sirkka Paikkala (Institute for the Languages of Finland) and Teemu Leskinen (National Land Survey of Finland).
[Show full text]
Labour Market Areas Final Technical Report of the Finnish Project September 2017
Eurostat – Labour Market Areas – Final Technical report – Finland 1(37) Labour Market Areas Final Technical report of the Finnish project September 2017 Data collection for sub-national statistics (Labour Market Areas) Grant Agreement No. 08141.2015.001-2015.499 Yrjö Palttila, Statistics Finland, 22 September 2017 Postal address: 3rd floor, FI-00022 Statistics Finland E-mail: [email protected] Yrjö Palttila, Statistics Finland, 22 September 2017 Eurostat – Labour Market Areas – Final Technical report – Finland 2(37) Contents: 1. Overview 1.1 Objective of the work 1.2 Finland’s national travel-to-work areas 1.3 Tasks of the project 2. Results of the Finnish project 2.1 Improving IT tools to facilitate the implementation of the method (Task 2) 2.2 The finished SAS IML module (Task 2) 2.3 Define Finland’s LMAs based on the EU method (Task 4) 3. Assessing the feasibility of implementation of the EU method 3.1 Feasibility of implementation of the EU method (Task 3) 3.2 Assessing the feasibility of the adaptation of the current method of Finland’s national travel-to-work areas to the proposed method (Task 3) 4. The use and the future of the LMAs Appendix 1. Visualization of the test results (November 2016) Appendix 2. The lists of the LAU2s (test 12) (November 2016) Appendix 3. The finished SAS IML module LMAwSAS.1409 (September 2017) 1. Overview 1.1 Objective of the work In the background of the action was the need for comparable functional areas in EU-wide territorial policy analyses. The NUTS cross-national regions cover the whole EU territory, but they are usually regional administrative areas, which are the re- sult of historical circumstances.
[Show full text]
Koselvityksen Väliraportista: Yleistä
Hankasalmen kunnan lausunto Jyväskylän kaupunkiseudun erityisen kuntaja- koselvityksen väliraportista: TIIVISTELMÄ HANKASALMEN KUNNAN LAUSUNNOSTA Hankasalmen kunta katsoo väliraportin perusteella, että erityisessä kuntajakoselvityksessä ei ole noussut esille sellaista vaihtoehtoista kuntarakennemallia, joka voisi johtaa Hankasalmen kunnan osalta kuntaliitokseen. Käytännössä kuntajakoselvitys ja sen kautta kerätyt tiedot tukevat tässä vaiheessa pääsääntöisesti sitä, että Hankasalmen kunta säilyy jatkossakin itsenäisenä kunta- na. Kuntarakennelain selvitysvelvoitteista Hankasalmen kunnan osalta täyttyy vain väestön määrä. Sik- si kuntajakoselvityksessä esille nousseet tiedot, jotka osoittavat Hankasalmen sijaitsevan selkeästi hieman erillään muusta kaupunkiseudusta, ovat hyvin linjassa kuntarakennelain lähtökohtien kans- sa. Hankasalmella suhtaudutaan vakavasti kuntatalouden ja ikääntymisen tuomiin haasteisiin. Pienenä 5500 asukkaan kuntana Hankasalmen on jatkossa oltava valmis tiiviiseen yhteistyöhön Jy- väskylän ja sitä ympäröivän kaupunkiseudun kanssa. Palvelurakenteita on uudistettava mo- nella tavoin, jotta kunta ei ajaudu taloutensa suhteen kriisikunnaksi. Tässä työssä auttaa kui- tenkin se, että kunnan lainakanta on kohtuullisen pieni, omavaraisuusaste vielä toistaiseksi hyvä ja kunnalla on myös realisoitavissa olevaa varallisuutta talouden tasapainottamista tukemaan. Edellä olevaan tiivistelmään on päädytty seuraavan väliraporttia analysoivan lausunnon kautta. Yleistä: Hankasalmen kunnan näkemyksen mukaan kuntajakoselvittäjät ovat
[Show full text]
Recent Noteworthy Findings of Fungus Gnats from Finland and Northwestern Russia (Diptera: Ditomyiidae, Keroplatidae, Bolitophilidae and Mycetophilidae)
Biodiversity Data Journal 2: e1068 doi: 10.3897/BDJ.2.e1068 Taxonomic paper Recent noteworthy findings of fungus gnats from Finland and northwestern Russia (Diptera: Ditomyiidae, Keroplatidae, Bolitophilidae and Mycetophilidae) Jevgeni Jakovlev†, Jukka Salmela ‡,§, Alexei Polevoi|, Jouni Penttinen ¶, Noora-Annukka Vartija# † Finnish Environment Insitutute, Helsinki, Finland ‡ Metsähallitus (Natural Heritage Services), Rovaniemi, Finland § Zoological Museum, University of Turku, Turku, Finland | Forest Research Institute KarRC RAS, Petrozavodsk, Russia ¶ Metsähallitus (Natural Heritage Services), Jyväskylä, Finland # Toivakka, Myllyntie, Finland Corresponding author: Jukka Salmela ([email protected]) Academic editor: Vladimir Blagoderov Received: 10 Feb 2014 | Accepted: 01 Apr 2014 | Published: 02 Apr 2014 Citation: Jakovlev J, Salmela J, Polevoi A, Penttinen J, Vartija N (2014) Recent noteworthy findings of fungus gnats from Finland and northwestern Russia (Diptera: Ditomyiidae, Keroplatidae, Bolitophilidae and Mycetophilidae). Biodiversity Data Journal 2: e1068. doi: 10.3897/BDJ.2.e1068 Abstract New faunistic data on fungus gnats (Diptera: Sciaroidea excluding Sciaridae) from Finland and NW Russia (Karelia and Murmansk Region) are presented. A total of 64 and 34 species are reported for the first time form Finland and Russian Karelia, respectively. Nine of the species are also new for the European fauna: Mycomya shewelli Väisänen, 1984,M. thula Väisänen, 1984, Acnemia trifida Zaitzev, 1982, Coelosia gracilis Johannsen, 1912, Orfelia krivosheinae Zaitzev, 1994, Mycetophila biformis Maximova, 2002, M. monstera Maximova, 2002, M. uschaica Subbotina & Maximova, 2011 and Trichonta palustris Maximova, 2002. Keywords Sciaroidea, Fennoscandia, faunistics © Jakovlev J et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
[Show full text]
LUETTELO Kuntien Ja Seurakuntien Tuloveroprosenteista Vuonna 2021
Dnro VH/8082/00.01.00/2020 LUETTELO kuntien ja seurakuntien tuloveroprosenteista vuonna 2021 Verohallinto on verotusmenettelystä annetun lain (1558/1995) 91 a §:n 3 momentin nojalla, sellaisena kuin se on laissa 520/2010, antanut seuraavan luettelon varainhoitovuodeksi 2021 vahvistetuista kuntien, evankelis-luterilaisen kirkon ja ortodoksisen kirkkokunnan seurakuntien tuloveroprosenteista. Kunta Kunnan Ev.lut. Ortodoks. tuloveroprosentti seurakunnan seurakunnan tuloveroprosentti tuloveroprosentti Akaa 22,25 1,70 2,00 Alajärvi 21,75 1,75 2,00 Alavieska 22,00 1,80 2,10 Alavus 21,25 1,75 2,00 Asikkala 20,75 1,75 1,80 Askola 21,50 1,75 1,80 Aura 21,50 1,35 1,75 Brändö 17,75 2,00 1,75 Eckerö 19,00 2,00 1,75 Enonkoski 21,00 1,60 1,95 Enontekiö 21,25 1,75 2,20 Espoo 18,00 1,00 1,80 Eura 21,00 1,50 1,75 Eurajoki 18,00 1,60 2,00 Evijärvi 22,50 1,75 2,00 Finström 19,50 1,95 1,75 Forssa 20,50 1,40 1,80 Föglö 17,50 2,00 1,75 Geta 18,50 1,95 1,75 Haapajärvi 22,50 1,75 2,00 Haapavesi 22,00 1,80 2,00 Hailuoto 20,50 1,80 2,10 Halsua 23,50 1,70 2,00 Hamina 21,00 1,60 1,85 Hammarland 18,00 1,80 1,75 Hankasalmi 22,00 1,95 2,00 Hanko 21,75 1,60 1,80 Harjavalta 21,50 1,75 1,75 Hartola 21,50 1,75 1,95 Hattula 20,75 1,50 1,80 Hausjärvi 21,50 1,75 1,80 Heinola 20,50 1,50 1,80 Heinävesi 21,00 1,80 1,95 Helsinki 18,00 1,00 1,80 Hirvensalmi 20,00 1,75 1,95 Hollola 21,00 1,75 1,80 Huittinen 21,00 1,60 1,75 Humppila 22,00 1,90 1,80 Hyrynsalmi 21,75 1,75 1,95 Hyvinkää 20,25 1,25 1,80 Hämeenkyrö 22,00 1,70 2,00 Hämeenlinna 21,00 1,30 1,80 Ii 21,50 1,50 2,10 Iisalmi
[Show full text]
Turning Aging and Wellness Into an Asset for the Region, Wellness Dream Lab and Gerocenter
TurningTurning agingaging andand wellnesswellness intointo anan assetasset forfor thethe regionregion,, WellnessWellness DreamDream LabLab andand GerocenterGerocenter:: aa casecase studystudy fromfrom thethe JyväskyläJyväskylä regionregion Tuesday 17 October 2006 OECD/IMHE Copenhagen Juha Hautanen Director of Development Wellness Technology and Industry Jyväskylä Regional Development Company Jykes Ltd. The Presentation • Some facts and figures about Central Finland and Jyväskylä region • The mega trends • The strategy of wellness technology • Wellness Dream Lab and GeroCenter About region… Europe Finland Jyväskylä region Rural municipality of Jyväskylä Laukaa Uurainen Hankasalmi Petäjävesi Jyväskylä Muurame Population in Finland Toivakka Population in Finland Korpilahti isis 5255580 5255580 PopulationPopulation in in Population in Population in JyväskyläJyväskylä region region PopulationPopulation Density Density Central Finland Central Finland isis 163 163 000 000 is 15,6 inhabitant/km22 is 15,6 inhabitant/km isis 267 267 902 902 PopulationPopulation Density Density Population Density Population Density isis 36,6 36,6 inhabitant/km2 inhabitant/km2 isis 13,8 13,8 inhabitant/km inhabitant/km22 16,9% of area is water Some words about mega trends… The Drivers of Development • Ageing society • The need for and the costs of health and social services are increasing • New technology, new operational models, new solutions • Citizens have shown a growing interest in their own health • Citizen empowerment, increasing interest in alternative services
[Show full text]
Esityksen Otsikko
17.5.2013 Kirsi Mukkala KESKI-SUOMEN KUNTIEN TALOUSLUKUJA 2012 Tiedot perustuvat pääosin kuntien toimittamiin tietoihin (Kuntatalousryhmän aloitteesta tehty kysely) 1 Toimintakate €/as. 2012 -4380 Jyväskylä -4643 Laukaa -4855 Toivakka -4864 Koko maa* -5007 Äänekoski -5196 Petäjävesi -5269 Saarijärvi -5272 Jämsä -5441 Joutsa -5450 Konnevesi -5500 Kannonkoski -5538 Hankasalmi -5700 Viitasaari -5731 Karstula -5992 Pihtipudas -6118 Multia -6136 Kuhmoinen -6249 Kivijärvi -7000 -6000 -5000 -4000 -3000 -2000 -1000 0 *Koko maan osalta arvio 2012. Puuttuvien kuntien tiedot täydentyvät myöhemmin. Toimintakate €/as. 2010-2012 Hankasalmi Laukaa 2010 Joutsa Luhanka 2010 2011 Jyväskylä Multia 2012 Jämsä 2011 Muurame Kannonkoski 2012 Petäjävesi Karstula Pihtipudas Keuruu Saarijärvi Kinnula Toivakka Kivijärvi Konnevesi Uurainen Kuhmoinen Viitasaari Kyyjärvi Äänekoski -7000 -6000 -5000 -4000 -3000 -2000 -1000 0 -7000 -6000 -5000 -4000 -3000 -2000 -1000 0 Vuoden 2012 osin puuttuvat tiedot täydentyvät myöhemmin. Vuosikate €/as. 2012 Kannonkoski 699 Kuhmoinen 503 Pihtipudas 336 Muurame 241 Koko maa* 238 Äänekoski 171 Keuruu 164 Hankasalmi 143 Saarijärvi 137 Kivijärvi 125 Laukaa 99 Toivakka 94 Viitasaari 92 Joutsa 90 Jämsä 84 Karstula 64 Jyväskylä 47 Luhanka 13 Multia 6 Konnevesi -4 Petäjävesi -78 Uurainen -95 Kyyjärvi -448 -600 -400 -200 0 200 400 600 800 *Koko maan osalta arvio 2012. Harkinnanvaraista valtionosuuden korotusta saaneet kunnat: Multia 250 000 € (135 €/as.), Pihtipudas 600 000 € (133 €/as.) ja Äänekoski 900 000 (44 €/as.) Puuttuvien kuntien tiedot täydentyvät myöhemmin. Vuosikate €/as. 2010-2012 1400 600 2010 2011 2012 2010 2011 2012 1200 500 1000 400 800 600 300 400 200 200 100 0 -200 0 -400 -100 -600 -200 Vuoden 2012 osin puuttuvat tiedot täydentyvät myöhemmin.
[Show full text]
Transnational Finnish Mobilities: Proceedings of Finnforum XI
Johanna Leinonen and Auvo Kostiainen (Eds.) Johanna Leinonen and Auvo Kostiainen This volume is based on a selection of papers presented at Johanna Leinonen and Auvo Kostiainen (Eds.) the conference FinnForum XI: Transnational Finnish Mobili- ties, held in Turku, Finland, in 2016. The twelve chapters dis- cuss two key issues of our time, mobility and transnational- ism, from the perspective of Finnish migration. The volume is divided into four sections. Part I, Mobile Pasts, Finland and Beyond, brings forth how Finland’s past – often imagined TRANSNATIONAL as more sedentary than today’s mobile world – was molded by various short and long-distance mobilities that occurred FINNISH MOBILITIES: both voluntarily and involuntarily. In Part II, Transnational Influences across the Atlantic, the focus is on sociocultural PROCEEDINGS OF transnationalism of Finnish migrants in the early 20th cen- tury United States. Taken together, Parts I and II show how FINNFORUM XI mobility and transnationalism are not unique features of our FINNISH MOBILITIES TRANSNATIONAL time, as scholars tend to portray them. Even before modern communication technologies and modes of transportation, migrants moved back and forth and nurtured transnational ties in various ways. Part III, Making of Contemporary Finn- ish America, examines how Finnishness is understood and maintained in North America today, focusing on the con- cepts of symbolic ethnicity and virtual villages. Part IV, Con- temporary Finnish Mobilities, centers on Finns’ present-day emigration patterns, repatriation experiences, and citizen- ship practices, illustrating how, globally speaking, Finns are privileged in their ability to be mobile and exercise transna- tionalism. Not only is the ability to move spread very uneven- ly, so is the capability to upkeep transnational connections, be they sociocultural, economic, political, or purely symbol- ic.
[Show full text]
Final Report: ”National Balance Sheets for Non-Financial Assets in Finland”
Final report 1(54) Department of Economic and Environmental Statistics 24.2.2014 Ville Haltia National Land Survey of Finland Risto Peltola Grant agreement number 20102.2011 .001-2011.181 Theme: 2.01 - National accounts methodological and technical improvements Final report: ”National balance sheets for non-financial assets in Finland” Final report 2(54) Department of Economic and Environmental Statistics 24.2.2014 Ville Haltia National Land Survey of Finland Risto Peltola CONTENTS Foreword…………………………………………………………………………………………………………...3 PART I: Evaluation of data sources, the present capital stock and inventories 1. Main data sources and possible need for new data sources…………………………………………………..…3 2. Evaluation of the present capital stock from the point of view of balance sheets 2.1 Description of the present capital stock ……………………………………………………….5 2.2 Improvement needs of the present capital stock from the point of view of balance sheets…....7 3. Changes to the IT-system……………………………………………………………………………………….9 4. Balance sheets by asset type and by sector……………………………………………………………………..10 PART II: Estimation of land value 1. Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………………………….12 2. Choice of the estimation method.........................................................................................................................12 3. Estimating the value of land by using the direct approach..................................................................................15 4. Estimation of land area by land types 4.1 In general...................................................................................................................................15
[Show full text]
Muutoksia Hankasalmen Jätemaksuihin Vuodelle 2021
Hankasalmi, Kannonkoski, Karstula, Kinnula, Kivijärvi, Multia Petäjävesi, Pihtipudas, Saarijärvi, Uurainen, Viitasaari, Äänekoski Muutoksia Hankasalmen jätemaksuihin vuodelle 2021 Jätteen hinnoittelun periaatteita Jätetaksa perustuu jätelain kunnille asetettuihin velvoitteisiin periä järjestämästään jätehuollosta jätemaksua, jolla katetaan tämän tehtävän hoitamisesta aiheutuneet kustannukset. Jätetaksaa sovelletaan kunnan jätehuollon järjestämisvastuulle kuuluviin jätteisiin, kuten asumisessa sekä kunnan hallinto- ja palvelutoiminnassa syntyviin jätteisiin. Kiinteistöjen jätemaksu koostuu perusmaksusta sekä jäteastian tyhjennysmaksusta. Sekajätteen astiapalvelun sijaan voi asiakas valita aluekeräyspisteen sekajäteastian käyttöoikeuden, jonka kuljetuksesta vastaa Sammakkokangas Oy. Jäteastioiden tyhjennysmaksut muodostuvat kuljetus- ja käsittelyosasta, jotka on eroteltu taksaan. Kuljetusosalla katetaan jätteiden kuljetuksesta ja kuljetusten järjestämisestä aiheutuvia kustannuksia. Käsittelyosalla katetaan kunkin jätelajin käsittelykustannukset. Hankasalmella käytössä olevassa kiinteistön haltijan järjestämässä jätteenkuljetuksessa kiinteistön haltija kilpailuttaa itse jätteenkuljetuksensa. Kuljetusyrittäjä taas päättää hinnoittelustaan kuljetuksen osalta. Seka- ja biojätteen jätteenkäsittelyhinnan vahvistaa Sydän-Suomen jätelautakunta. Tuottajavastuullisen pakkausjätteiden eli lasi-, metalli-, kartonki- ja muovipakkausten käsittelyn asiakas on maksanut jo pakkauksen ostaessaan. Hankasalmella pakkausjätteitä kerätään yhdellä tuottajien ylläpitämällä
[Show full text]
The Wolf Debate in Finland
Ruralia Institute Jukka Bisi Sami Kurki The wolf debate in Finland Publications 12 The wolf debate in Finland Expectations and objectives for the management of the wolf population at regional and national level Jukka Bisi Sami Kurki Seinäjoki 2008 Publisher: University of Helsinki Ruralia Institute Kampusranta 9 FIN-60320 SEINÄJOKI Puh. +358 6 4213 300 Fax. +358 6 4213 301 ISBN 978-952-10-4135-8 (paperback) 978-952-10-4136-5 (pdf) ISSN 1796-0649 (paperback) 1796-0657 (pdf) Printed by Oy Fram Ab, Vaasa Foreword The wolf has returned to the Finnish countryside and once again there is no avoiding the fact that the interaction of man and wolf is an extremely painful one. Attitudes to the wolf divide Finns, and the wolf itself causes opinion to change fast once it has arrived in new areas. The wolf is a perpetual problem environmentally, something people have to live with on a daily basis. But what is the importance of social sustainability and how can protection of the wolf be reconciled with what local people see as a decline in the quality of life? How should the wolf issue be managed and who should act in what situation? These are the questions which have to be addressed in preparations for a national policy on wolves. Studies relating to policy on large carnivores for the University of Helsinki’s Institute for Rural Research and Training (Ruralia) represent a breakthrough, yet people in rural communities have always been at the centre of research. The sustainable use of natural resources is becoming more and more about socio-economic issues, with ecology obviously imposing its own set of condi- tions.
[Show full text]
Learning Regional Council of Central Finland Central Finland in Figures
Central Finland The Region of Knowledge, Skills, Entrepreneurship and Quality of life Rauli Sorvari Programme manager; HR, Education, learning Regional Council of Central Finland Central Finland in figures • Population 267 200 • Total area 19 400 km2 • Water area 3 100 km2 • Mean temperature 2,6 oC • Rainy days 12/year • 6 sub-regions • 30 municipalities Regional Profile Share of figures in Finland • Population 5,1 % • Enterprises 4,4 % • GDP 4,2 % • Unemployed 6,1% • Employment - Agriculture 5,8 % - Manufacturing 5,2 % - Construction 4,7 % - Private Services 3,9 % - Public Sector 5,0 % PIHTIPUDAS KINNULA 4996 OBJECTIVE 1 1977 SUBREGIONS AND KIVIJÄRVI POPULATION 1489 VIITASAARI KYYJÄRVI 7602 1739 SAARIJÄRVI-VIITASAARI SAARIJÄRVI-VIITASAARI 35176 SUBREGION ÄÄNEKOSKI 23577 KANNONKOSKI 1634 KEURUU 13290 KARSTULA EU OBJECTIVE 4904 JYVÄSKYLÄ 163369 ÄÄNEKOSKI JÄMSÄ 25658 SUBREGION JOUTSA 6094 AREAS IN SAARIJÄRVI PYLKÖNMÄKI SUMIAINEN 10205 1071 ÄÄNEKOSKI 1293 13703 KONNEVESI CENTRAL FINLAND 267164 CENTRAL SUOLAHTI 3175 5461 MULTIA UURAINEN FINLAND 2065 3078 JYVÄSKYLÄ SUBREGION KEURUU JYVÄSKYLÄ RURAL HANKASALMI SUBREGION MUNICIPALITY LAUKAA 5590 2000-2006 16929 KEURUU PETÄJÄVESI 33820 3691 11395 JYVÄSKYLÄ 82409 JÄMSÄNKOSKI MUURAME TOIVAKKA 7581 8510 2390 KORPILAHTI 5016 OBJECTIVE 2 JÄMSÄ SUBREGION LEIVONMÄKI 1162 JÄMSÄ JOUTSA AND 3 15306 SUBREGION LUHANKA JOUTSA 905 4106 KUHMOINEN 2880 Employment and Enterprises 2005 Employment Enterpresis Premises • Agriculture and Forestry 6000 434 • Mining of Minerals 250 102 • Industry 22500 1342 • Electricity
[Show full text]