Thanatos Kotilainen 210112 EDIT
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Toponymic Guidelines (Pdf)
UNITED NATIONS GROUP OF EXPERTS ON GEOGRAPHICAL NAMES 22nd session, New York, 20-29 April 2004 Item 17 of the provisional agenda TOPONYMIC GUIDELINES FOR MAP EDITORS AND OTHER EDITORS FINLAND Fourth, revised edition 2004* (v. 4.11, April 2021**) * Prepared by Sirkka Paikkala (Research Institute for the Languages of Finland) in collaboration with the Na- tional Land Survey of Finland (Teemu Leskinen) and the Geographical Society of Finland (Kerkko Hakulinen). The 22nd session of UNGEGN in 2004, WP 49. The first edition of this paper, Toponymic Guidelines for International Cartography - Finland, submitted by Mr. A. Rostvik, Norden Division, was presented to the Ninth session of UNGEGN 1981 (WP 37). The second version, Toponymic guidelines for cartography: Finland, prepared by the Onomastic Division of the Finnish Research Centre for Domestic Languages in collabo- ration with the Swedish Language Division and the National Board of Survey, was presented to the 4th UN Conference on the Standardization of Geographical Names in 1982 (E/CONF.74/L.41). The second edition, Toponymic Guidelines for Map an Other Editors, pre- paired by the Finnish Research Centre for Domestic Languages together with National Land Survey, was presented to the 17th session of UNGEGNUnited in 1994 (WP 63). The third edi- tion (revised version), prepared by Sirkka Paikkala in collaboration with the National Land Sur- vey of Finland and the Geographical Society of Finland, was presented to the 7th UN Conference on the Standardization of Geographical Names (New York, 13-22 January 1998, E/CONF.91/L. 17) ** Editions 4.1 - 4.6 updated by Sirkka Paikkala (Institute for the Languages of Finland) and Teemu Leskinen (National Land Survey of Finland). -
Labour Market Areas Final Technical Report of the Finnish Project September 2017
Eurostat – Labour Market Areas – Final Technical report – Finland 1(37) Labour Market Areas Final Technical report of the Finnish project September 2017 Data collection for sub-national statistics (Labour Market Areas) Grant Agreement No. 08141.2015.001-2015.499 Yrjö Palttila, Statistics Finland, 22 September 2017 Postal address: 3rd floor, FI-00022 Statistics Finland E-mail: [email protected] Yrjö Palttila, Statistics Finland, 22 September 2017 Eurostat – Labour Market Areas – Final Technical report – Finland 2(37) Contents: 1. Overview 1.1 Objective of the work 1.2 Finland’s national travel-to-work areas 1.3 Tasks of the project 2. Results of the Finnish project 2.1 Improving IT tools to facilitate the implementation of the method (Task 2) 2.2 The finished SAS IML module (Task 2) 2.3 Define Finland’s LMAs based on the EU method (Task 4) 3. Assessing the feasibility of implementation of the EU method 3.1 Feasibility of implementation of the EU method (Task 3) 3.2 Assessing the feasibility of the adaptation of the current method of Finland’s national travel-to-work areas to the proposed method (Task 3) 4. The use and the future of the LMAs Appendix 1. Visualization of the test results (November 2016) Appendix 2. The lists of the LAU2s (test 12) (November 2016) Appendix 3. The finished SAS IML module LMAwSAS.1409 (September 2017) 1. Overview 1.1 Objective of the work In the background of the action was the need for comparable functional areas in EU-wide territorial policy analyses. The NUTS cross-national regions cover the whole EU territory, but they are usually regional administrative areas, which are the re- sult of historical circumstances. -
The Dispersal and Acclimatization of the Muskrat, Ondatra Zibethicus (L.), in Finland
University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Wildlife Damage Management, Internet Center Other Publications in Wildlife Management for 1960 The dispersal and acclimatization of the muskrat, Ondatra zibethicus (L.), in Finland Atso Artimo Suomen Riistanhoito-Saatio (Finnish Game Foundation) Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/icwdmother Part of the Environmental Sciences Commons Artimo, Atso, "The dispersal and acclimatization of the muskrat, Ondatra zibethicus (L.), in Finland" (1960). Other Publications in Wildlife Management. 65. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/icwdmother/65 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Wildlife Damage Management, Internet Center for at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Other Publications in Wildlife Management by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. R I 1ST A TIE T L .~1 U ( K A I S U J A ,>""'liSt I " e'e 'I >~ ~··21' \. • ; I .. '. .' . .,~., . <)/ ." , ., Thedi$perscdQnd.a~C:li"'dti~otlin. of ,the , , :n~skret, Ond~trq ~ib.t~i~',{(.h in. Firtland , 8y: ATSO ARTIMO . RllSTATIETEELLISljX JULKAISUJA PAPERS ON GAME RESEARCH 21 The dispersal and acclimatization of the muskrat, Ondatra zibethicus (l.), in Finland By ATSO ARTIMO Helsinki 1960 SUOMEN FIN LANDS R I 1ST A N HOI T O-S A A T I b ] AK TV ARDSSTI FTELSE Riistantutkimuslaitos Viltforskningsinstitutet Helsinki, Unionink. 45 B Helsingfors, Unionsg. 45 B FINNISH GAME FOUNDATION Game Research Institute Helsinki, Unionink. 45 B Helsinki 1960 . K. F. Puromichen Kirjapaino O.-Y. The dispersal and acclimatization of the muskrat, Ondatra zibethicus (L.), in Finland By Atso Artimo CONTENTS I. -
Recent Noteworthy Findings of Fungus Gnats from Finland and Northwestern Russia (Diptera: Ditomyiidae, Keroplatidae, Bolitophilidae and Mycetophilidae)
Biodiversity Data Journal 2: e1068 doi: 10.3897/BDJ.2.e1068 Taxonomic paper Recent noteworthy findings of fungus gnats from Finland and northwestern Russia (Diptera: Ditomyiidae, Keroplatidae, Bolitophilidae and Mycetophilidae) Jevgeni Jakovlev†, Jukka Salmela ‡,§, Alexei Polevoi|, Jouni Penttinen ¶, Noora-Annukka Vartija# † Finnish Environment Insitutute, Helsinki, Finland ‡ Metsähallitus (Natural Heritage Services), Rovaniemi, Finland § Zoological Museum, University of Turku, Turku, Finland | Forest Research Institute KarRC RAS, Petrozavodsk, Russia ¶ Metsähallitus (Natural Heritage Services), Jyväskylä, Finland # Toivakka, Myllyntie, Finland Corresponding author: Jukka Salmela ([email protected]) Academic editor: Vladimir Blagoderov Received: 10 Feb 2014 | Accepted: 01 Apr 2014 | Published: 02 Apr 2014 Citation: Jakovlev J, Salmela J, Polevoi A, Penttinen J, Vartija N (2014) Recent noteworthy findings of fungus gnats from Finland and northwestern Russia (Diptera: Ditomyiidae, Keroplatidae, Bolitophilidae and Mycetophilidae). Biodiversity Data Journal 2: e1068. doi: 10.3897/BDJ.2.e1068 Abstract New faunistic data on fungus gnats (Diptera: Sciaroidea excluding Sciaridae) from Finland and NW Russia (Karelia and Murmansk Region) are presented. A total of 64 and 34 species are reported for the first time form Finland and Russian Karelia, respectively. Nine of the species are also new for the European fauna: Mycomya shewelli Väisänen, 1984,M. thula Väisänen, 1984, Acnemia trifida Zaitzev, 1982, Coelosia gracilis Johannsen, 1912, Orfelia krivosheinae Zaitzev, 1994, Mycetophila biformis Maximova, 2002, M. monstera Maximova, 2002, M. uschaica Subbotina & Maximova, 2011 and Trichonta palustris Maximova, 2002. Keywords Sciaroidea, Fennoscandia, faunistics © Jakovlev J et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. -
LUETTELO Kuntien Ja Seurakuntien Tuloveroprosenteista Vuonna 2021
Dnro VH/8082/00.01.00/2020 LUETTELO kuntien ja seurakuntien tuloveroprosenteista vuonna 2021 Verohallinto on verotusmenettelystä annetun lain (1558/1995) 91 a §:n 3 momentin nojalla, sellaisena kuin se on laissa 520/2010, antanut seuraavan luettelon varainhoitovuodeksi 2021 vahvistetuista kuntien, evankelis-luterilaisen kirkon ja ortodoksisen kirkkokunnan seurakuntien tuloveroprosenteista. Kunta Kunnan Ev.lut. Ortodoks. tuloveroprosentti seurakunnan seurakunnan tuloveroprosentti tuloveroprosentti Akaa 22,25 1,70 2,00 Alajärvi 21,75 1,75 2,00 Alavieska 22,00 1,80 2,10 Alavus 21,25 1,75 2,00 Asikkala 20,75 1,75 1,80 Askola 21,50 1,75 1,80 Aura 21,50 1,35 1,75 Brändö 17,75 2,00 1,75 Eckerö 19,00 2,00 1,75 Enonkoski 21,00 1,60 1,95 Enontekiö 21,25 1,75 2,20 Espoo 18,00 1,00 1,80 Eura 21,00 1,50 1,75 Eurajoki 18,00 1,60 2,00 Evijärvi 22,50 1,75 2,00 Finström 19,50 1,95 1,75 Forssa 20,50 1,40 1,80 Föglö 17,50 2,00 1,75 Geta 18,50 1,95 1,75 Haapajärvi 22,50 1,75 2,00 Haapavesi 22,00 1,80 2,00 Hailuoto 20,50 1,80 2,10 Halsua 23,50 1,70 2,00 Hamina 21,00 1,60 1,85 Hammarland 18,00 1,80 1,75 Hankasalmi 22,00 1,95 2,00 Hanko 21,75 1,60 1,80 Harjavalta 21,50 1,75 1,75 Hartola 21,50 1,75 1,95 Hattula 20,75 1,50 1,80 Hausjärvi 21,50 1,75 1,80 Heinola 20,50 1,50 1,80 Heinävesi 21,00 1,80 1,95 Helsinki 18,00 1,00 1,80 Hirvensalmi 20,00 1,75 1,95 Hollola 21,00 1,75 1,80 Huittinen 21,00 1,60 1,75 Humppila 22,00 1,90 1,80 Hyrynsalmi 21,75 1,75 1,95 Hyvinkää 20,25 1,25 1,80 Hämeenkyrö 22,00 1,70 2,00 Hämeenlinna 21,00 1,30 1,80 Ii 21,50 1,50 2,10 Iisalmi -
Esityksen Otsikko
17.5.2013 Kirsi Mukkala KESKI-SUOMEN KUNTIEN TALOUSLUKUJA 2012 Tiedot perustuvat pääosin kuntien toimittamiin tietoihin (Kuntatalousryhmän aloitteesta tehty kysely) 1 Toimintakate €/as. 2012 -4380 Jyväskylä -4643 Laukaa -4855 Toivakka -4864 Koko maa* -5007 Äänekoski -5196 Petäjävesi -5269 Saarijärvi -5272 Jämsä -5441 Joutsa -5450 Konnevesi -5500 Kannonkoski -5538 Hankasalmi -5700 Viitasaari -5731 Karstula -5992 Pihtipudas -6118 Multia -6136 Kuhmoinen -6249 Kivijärvi -7000 -6000 -5000 -4000 -3000 -2000 -1000 0 *Koko maan osalta arvio 2012. Puuttuvien kuntien tiedot täydentyvät myöhemmin. Toimintakate €/as. 2010-2012 Hankasalmi Laukaa 2010 Joutsa Luhanka 2010 2011 Jyväskylä Multia 2012 Jämsä 2011 Muurame Kannonkoski 2012 Petäjävesi Karstula Pihtipudas Keuruu Saarijärvi Kinnula Toivakka Kivijärvi Konnevesi Uurainen Kuhmoinen Viitasaari Kyyjärvi Äänekoski -7000 -6000 -5000 -4000 -3000 -2000 -1000 0 -7000 -6000 -5000 -4000 -3000 -2000 -1000 0 Vuoden 2012 osin puuttuvat tiedot täydentyvät myöhemmin. Vuosikate €/as. 2012 Kannonkoski 699 Kuhmoinen 503 Pihtipudas 336 Muurame 241 Koko maa* 238 Äänekoski 171 Keuruu 164 Hankasalmi 143 Saarijärvi 137 Kivijärvi 125 Laukaa 99 Toivakka 94 Viitasaari 92 Joutsa 90 Jämsä 84 Karstula 64 Jyväskylä 47 Luhanka 13 Multia 6 Konnevesi -4 Petäjävesi -78 Uurainen -95 Kyyjärvi -448 -600 -400 -200 0 200 400 600 800 *Koko maan osalta arvio 2012. Harkinnanvaraista valtionosuuden korotusta saaneet kunnat: Multia 250 000 € (135 €/as.), Pihtipudas 600 000 € (133 €/as.) ja Äänekoski 900 000 (44 €/as.) Puuttuvien kuntien tiedot täydentyvät myöhemmin. Vuosikate €/as. 2010-2012 1400 600 2010 2011 2012 2010 2011 2012 1200 500 1000 400 800 600 300 400 200 200 100 0 -200 0 -400 -100 -600 -200 Vuoden 2012 osin puuttuvat tiedot täydentyvät myöhemmin. -
Final Report: ”National Balance Sheets for Non-Financial Assets in Finland”
Final report 1(54) Department of Economic and Environmental Statistics 24.2.2014 Ville Haltia National Land Survey of Finland Risto Peltola Grant agreement number 20102.2011 .001-2011.181 Theme: 2.01 - National accounts methodological and technical improvements Final report: ”National balance sheets for non-financial assets in Finland” Final report 2(54) Department of Economic and Environmental Statistics 24.2.2014 Ville Haltia National Land Survey of Finland Risto Peltola CONTENTS Foreword…………………………………………………………………………………………………………...3 PART I: Evaluation of data sources, the present capital stock and inventories 1. Main data sources and possible need for new data sources…………………………………………………..…3 2. Evaluation of the present capital stock from the point of view of balance sheets 2.1 Description of the present capital stock ……………………………………………………….5 2.2 Improvement needs of the present capital stock from the point of view of balance sheets…....7 3. Changes to the IT-system……………………………………………………………………………………….9 4. Balance sheets by asset type and by sector……………………………………………………………………..10 PART II: Estimation of land value 1. Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………………………….12 2. Choice of the estimation method.........................................................................................................................12 3. Estimating the value of land by using the direct approach..................................................................................15 4. Estimation of land area by land types 4.1 In general...................................................................................................................................15 -
036-Bengtsson-Finlan
Unequal poverty and equal industrialization: Finnish wealth, 1750–1900 Erik Bengtsson., Anna Missiaia, Ilkka Nummela and Mats Olsson For presentation at the First WID.world Conference, Paris, 14-15 December 2017 Preliminary! All comments welcome 9 918 words, 10 tables, 3 figures Abstract This paper presents for the first time estimates of wealth and its distribution for Finland from 1750 to 1900. Finland is a highly interesting case for historical inequality studies, as a poor and backward European country which embarked on industrialization only in the late nineteenth century. This gives us the opportunity to re-consider common theories and arguments about the relationships between economic growth and inequality. Using wealth data from probate inventories, we show that Finland was very unequal between 1750 and 1850, with the top decile owning about 85 per cent of total wealth. This means that Finland was more unequal than much more advanced economies such as Britain, France and the US, which goes against the common assumption of poorer economies being more equal. It was also more unequal than its most immediate term of comparison, Sweden. Moreover, when industrialization took off in Finland and contra the commonplace assumption of industrialization increasing inequality (see the Kuznets Curve and its later developments), inequality started a downward trajectory where the share of the top decile decreased from 87 per cent in 1850 to 77 per cent in 1900, 71 per cent in 1910 and 64 per cent in 1920. We show that the high inequality from 1750 to 1850 is driven from the bottom, by a large share of the population owning nothing or close to nothing of value, while economic development after 1850 is pro-equality since the ownership of forests, since long in the hands of the peasantry, provided new export opportunities as pulp and paper became very valuable. -
Muutoksia Hankasalmen Jätemaksuihin Vuodelle 2021
Hankasalmi, Kannonkoski, Karstula, Kinnula, Kivijärvi, Multia Petäjävesi, Pihtipudas, Saarijärvi, Uurainen, Viitasaari, Äänekoski Muutoksia Hankasalmen jätemaksuihin vuodelle 2021 Jätteen hinnoittelun periaatteita Jätetaksa perustuu jätelain kunnille asetettuihin velvoitteisiin periä järjestämästään jätehuollosta jätemaksua, jolla katetaan tämän tehtävän hoitamisesta aiheutuneet kustannukset. Jätetaksaa sovelletaan kunnan jätehuollon järjestämisvastuulle kuuluviin jätteisiin, kuten asumisessa sekä kunnan hallinto- ja palvelutoiminnassa syntyviin jätteisiin. Kiinteistöjen jätemaksu koostuu perusmaksusta sekä jäteastian tyhjennysmaksusta. Sekajätteen astiapalvelun sijaan voi asiakas valita aluekeräyspisteen sekajäteastian käyttöoikeuden, jonka kuljetuksesta vastaa Sammakkokangas Oy. Jäteastioiden tyhjennysmaksut muodostuvat kuljetus- ja käsittelyosasta, jotka on eroteltu taksaan. Kuljetusosalla katetaan jätteiden kuljetuksesta ja kuljetusten järjestämisestä aiheutuvia kustannuksia. Käsittelyosalla katetaan kunkin jätelajin käsittelykustannukset. Hankasalmella käytössä olevassa kiinteistön haltijan järjestämässä jätteenkuljetuksessa kiinteistön haltija kilpailuttaa itse jätteenkuljetuksensa. Kuljetusyrittäjä taas päättää hinnoittelustaan kuljetuksen osalta. Seka- ja biojätteen jätteenkäsittelyhinnan vahvistaa Sydän-Suomen jätelautakunta. Tuottajavastuullisen pakkausjätteiden eli lasi-, metalli-, kartonki- ja muovipakkausten käsittelyn asiakas on maksanut jo pakkauksen ostaessaan. Hankasalmella pakkausjätteitä kerätään yhdellä tuottajien ylläpitämällä -
00161 Helsingfors EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 20.XII.2006
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 20.XII.2006 C(2006) 6604 PUBLIC VERSION WORKING LANGUAGE This document is made available for information purposes only. Subject: State aid N 359/2006 – Finland Regional aid map 2007-2013 Sir, 1. PROCEDURE (1) By letter dated 9 June 2006, registered at the Commission on the same day (A/34487) the Finnish authorities notified their regional aid map for the period 1.1.2007 – 31.12.2013. (2) By letters of 13 July 2006 (D/55869), 31 August 2006 (D/57475), 31 October 2006 (D/59291) and 21 November 2006 (D/59776) the Commission services asked for complementary information, which the Finnish authorities provided by letters of 6 September 2006, registered at the Commission on 7 September 2006 (A/37007), 10 November 2006, registered at the Commission on the same day (A/38998), 20 November 2006, registered at the Commission on the same day (A/39279), by letter of 27 November 2006, registered at the Commission on the same day (A/39610) and by letter of 1 December 2006, registered at the Commission on 4 December 2006 (A/39818). (3) On 21 December 2005, the Commission adopted the Guidelines on national regional aid for 2007-20131 (hereinafter “RAG”). In accordance with 1 Guidelines on national regional aid for 2007-2013, OJ C 54, 4.3.2006, p. 13. Utrikesminister Erkki TUOMIOJA Sjöekipaget PO Box 176, FIN – 00161 Helsingfors paragraph 100 of the RAG each Member State should notify to the Commission following the procedure of Article 88(3) of the Treaty, a single regional aid map covering its entire national territory which will apply for the period 2007- 2013. -
Wiitaunionin Kuntapari Hallinto Ja Talous
Wiitaunionin kuntapari Hallinto ja talous Viitasaaren kaupunki Keskitie 10, 44500 VIITASAARI www.viitasaari.fi VAIHDE VIITASAAREN KAUPUNGINTALO klo 9:00 - 15:00 014 459 7411 viitasaaren.kaupunki(at)viitasaari.fi FAKSI 014 459 7515 ASIOINTIPISTE te-toimisto, maistraatti klo 9.00 - 12.00 040 631 0150 etapalvelut(at)viitasaari.fi Keskushallinto KINNUNEN JANNE kaupunginjohtaja 044 459 7300 janne.kinnunen(at)viitasaari.fi HONKANEN TIINA kaupunginsihteeri 044 459 7301 tiina.honkanen(at)viitasaari.fi PULKKINEN VUOKKO kanslisti 050 310 8050 vuokko.pulkkinen(at)viitasaari.fi PÄÄKKÖ MERVI henkilöstöjohtaja, työsuojelupäällikkö 040 542 6071 mervi.paakko(at)viitasaari.fi KAUPPINEN MARKUS viestinnän kehittäjä 045 875 6875 markus.kauppinen(at)viitasaari.fi LINNA SISKO kaupunginvaltuuston pj 050 310 8069 sisko.linna(at)viitasaari.fi WIIK SAMI kaupunginhallituksen pj 040 184 2576 sami.wiik(at)viitasaari.fi Viitasaaren työllisyysyksikkö / tuunaripaja PAANANEN MERVI työllisyyspäällikkö 044 459 7578 mervi.paananen(at)viitasaari.fi KAUPPINEN KRISTIINA työpajaohjaaja 040 630 5376 kristiina.kauppinen(at)viitasaari.fi Pihtiputaan kunta Keskustie 9, (PL 36) 44800 PIHTIPUDAS www.pihtipudas.fi VAIHDE PIHTIPUTAAN KUNNANTALO klo 9:00 - 15:00 014 459 6800 pihtiputaan.kunta(at)pihtipudas.fi FAKSI 014 459 6801 ASIOINTIPISTE Kela, te-toimisto klo 9.00 - 12.00 etapalvelut(at)pihtipudas.fi Keskushallinto KINNUNEN ARI kunnanjohtaja 044 459 6806 ari.kinnunen(at)pihtipudas.fi SONNINEN PERTTU kunnansihteeri 044 459 6805 perttu.sonninen(at)pihtipudas.fi AUNOLA MANU yritysagentti -
The Wolf Debate in Finland
Ruralia Institute Jukka Bisi Sami Kurki The wolf debate in Finland Publications 12 The wolf debate in Finland Expectations and objectives for the management of the wolf population at regional and national level Jukka Bisi Sami Kurki Seinäjoki 2008 Publisher: University of Helsinki Ruralia Institute Kampusranta 9 FIN-60320 SEINÄJOKI Puh. +358 6 4213 300 Fax. +358 6 4213 301 ISBN 978-952-10-4135-8 (paperback) 978-952-10-4136-5 (pdf) ISSN 1796-0649 (paperback) 1796-0657 (pdf) Printed by Oy Fram Ab, Vaasa Foreword The wolf has returned to the Finnish countryside and once again there is no avoiding the fact that the interaction of man and wolf is an extremely painful one. Attitudes to the wolf divide Finns, and the wolf itself causes opinion to change fast once it has arrived in new areas. The wolf is a perpetual problem environmentally, something people have to live with on a daily basis. But what is the importance of social sustainability and how can protection of the wolf be reconciled with what local people see as a decline in the quality of life? How should the wolf issue be managed and who should act in what situation? These are the questions which have to be addressed in preparations for a national policy on wolves. Studies relating to policy on large carnivores for the University of Helsinki’s Institute for Rural Research and Training (Ruralia) represent a breakthrough, yet people in rural communities have always been at the centre of research. The sustainable use of natural resources is becoming more and more about socio-economic issues, with ecology obviously imposing its own set of condi- tions.