DOCSLIB.ORG

SENATORS of ARUBA

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SENATORS of ARUBA SENATORS of ARUBA Final report IV Senators gathering Aruba 2012 Presented in the ASAC General Meeting at the 2013 Area Conference in St. Louis. Missouri. USA It is for me, on behalf of the organizing committee, a real pleasure to present to you this report today. Why? Because the enthusiasm we had when we started and the success we achieved we can proudly say that it turned out for us in a tremendous good feeling that we will carry with us for the rest of our lives. Introduction It all started in Peru at the first Encounter in 2009 where we proposed for Aruba to be one of the hostesses and we were granted 2012. Since hat time we were present at all Senators gatherings and gained our experiences. Committee The committee consisted of Senator Dominico Werleman, secretary, JCI Member and past JCI Vice-President Dave Martinus, treasurer, Senator Reginald Andrews, social director, Senator Lucia Croes, fundraising director, Ex JCI member and friends of the Senators of Aruba Vera Angela, director of logistics, Senator Clark Martina representative of ASAC, Ex JCI Member Stanley Dabian as director public relation, JCI Member Mariela Pieternela, Website coordinator and my person Senator Elva Angela, project director. Besides this team we received assistance during the execution week of Senator Jeansy Martina, Honorary Member Rita Loopstok and Leticia Quant. Program We made up a program with a lot of activities. Among others we had a tour around the island, a jeep tour on the north coast of Aruba, visited the Tobacco Farm and the Aloe Factory, we went sunset sailing and visited the National Park . The highlight of this program was the visit of our Prime Minister Mike Eman and his spouse Doina at our opening ceremony & dinner, where he gave a speech mentioning “that we are great leaders bringing light, where there is darkness”. He walked through the room and greeted every present personally. Another highlight was the visit to the Parliament of Aruba where we were attended by the President of the Parliament Mr. Paul Croes and the Parliamentarians. We had the honor to be seated in the Parliament room and our President Ray Brathwaite exposed what ASAC is, while National EVP Indira Abath gave a 1 presentation what JCI is all about Another important activity was the forum about the Tourism of Aruba as the economic pilar and the lecture about Green Energy. Further more we visited a lot of restaurant and we had also the home hospitality evening. We visited the Carubbian Festival and we attended an evening with folkfloric dances, Aruban music and Aruban food. We comply with a Green Senate project where we planted trees for the house “Trampolin pa Trabou”. Also the past presidents were recognized at the opening ceremony. At the closing evening something very nice happened . After the dinner and the official part we start with a party and danced a lot. The band played non-stop all kind of songs. We had a guest star with a hidden talent, Senator Hebron Adoptie who joined the band and presented a nice song for us.There was an energy of happiness in the room and everybody was shinning. Finance The finance of this project was US $ 30.000,-- We had a small deficit of US$1000,-- which we managed to cover with a small fundraising after the project. In total we had 3 fundraisings: one coffee morning, one bingo and a small raffle. Thanks to these fundraisings we were able to have a lower fee, all included, for our participants. In total 30 persons registered and attended the complete program, 8 committee members participated in almost all activities and we had about 25 persons who attended individual activities. All our expenses have been paid and we are happy for this. Public Relation We promoted the event at the Encounter in Pereira,Colombia, in Curitiba Brasil at the Area Conference 2012, in Curacao and we kept sending a lot of information by email. A great exposure was given to ASAC with this activity by having a press conference when we started with the promotion. During the event week we exposed all our activities in the newspapers and on the television. Also President Ray Brathwaite was approached by the media several times for his words. Closing remarks We of the committee can say we are very proud of the IV Encounter of Senators , we were a real motivated and energetic team, working very hard, to achieve our goals for ASAC and for our island of ARUBA. We would like to express our sincere thanks to all the participants for their enthusiasm and their love. Senator Ray Brathwaite thank you for your support. Senator John Moreno thank you for having scheduled us in the first 5 Encounters and for believing in us, to Senator Marita Gonzales, for her driving force behind ASAC and the Encounters, to Senator Hebron Adoptie who voluntary took over the protocol part of the Prime Minister and who coordinated the project on Green Senate and to our All MIghty God for having given us the strength, the knowledge and wisdom to achieve such a great success. Thank You! Thank You! Thank You! Senator Elva M. Angela Projectleader IV Encounter of ASAC President JCI Senators of Aruba 2 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Nebraska Unicameral and Its Lasting Benefits, 76 Neb
    Nebraska Law Review Volume 76 | Issue 4 Article 6 1997 The eN braska Unicameral and Its Lasting Benefits Kim Robak Nebraska Lieutenant Governor Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nlr Recommended Citation Kim Robak, The Nebraska Unicameral and Its Lasting Benefits, 76 Neb. L. Rev. (1997) Available at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nlr/vol76/iss4/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law, College of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Nebraska Law Review by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Kim Robak* The Nebraska Unicameral and Its Lasting Benefits TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction .......................................... 791 II. Background ........................................... 793 III. Why and How the Unicameral Works ................. 799 A. Organization ...................................... 800 B. Process ........................................... 802 C. Partisanship ...................................... 804 D. The Lobby ........................................ 804 IV. Why a Nonpartisan Unicameral Is Superior to a Bicameral System ..................................... 805 A. Duplication ....................................... 805 B. Representative and Open Process .................. 809 C. Nonpartisanship .................................. 810 D. Leadership ........................................ 812 E. Lobby ............................................. 814 F. Balance
    [Show full text]
  • Internationale Übereinkünfte
    7.3.2014 DE Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 68/1 II (Rechtsakte ohne Gesetzescharakter) INTERNATIONALE ÜBEREINKÜNFTE BESCHLUSS DES RATES vom 2. Dezember 2013 über den Abschluss des Protokolls zur Änderung des Übereinkommens über das öffentliche Beschaffungswesen (2014/115/EU) DER RAT DER EUROPÄISCHEN UNION — HAT FOLGENDEN BESCHLUSS ERLASSEN: gestützt auf den Vertrag über die Arbeitsweise der Europäischen Artikel 1 Union, insbesondere auf Artikel 207 Absatz 4 Unterabsatz 1 in Verbindung mit Artikel 218 Absatz 6 Buchstabe a Ziffer v, Das Protokoll zur Änderung des Übereinkommens über das öffentliche Beschaffungswesen wird hiermit im Namen der Eu­ auf Vorschlag der Europäischen Kommission, ropäischen Union genehmigt. nach Zustimmung des Europäischen Parlaments, Der Wortlaut des Protokolls ist diesem Beschluss beigefügt. in Erwägung nachstehender Gründe: Artikel 2 Der Präsident des Rates wird die Person(en) bestellen, die befugt (1) Nach Maßgabe des Artikels XXIV Absatz 7 Buchstaben b ist (sind), im Namen der Union die Annahmeurkunde gemäß und c des WTO-Übereinkommens über das öffentliche Absatz 3 des Protokolls und im Einklang mit Artikel XXIV Beschaffungswesen (Government Procurement Agreement — Absatz 9 des GPA von 1994 zu hinterlegen, um die Zustim­ GPA von 1994) wurden im Januar 1999 Verhandlungen mung der Union, durch das Protokoll gebunden zu sein, zum über die Überarbeitung des GPA von 1994 eingeleitet. Ausdruck zu bringen ( 1 ). (2) Die Verhandlungen wurden von der Kommission in Ab­ stimmung mit dem nach Artikel 207 Absatz 3 des Ver­ Artikel 3 trags über die Arbeitsweise der Europäischen Union ein­ Das Protokoll ist dahingehend auszulegen, dass es keine Rechte gerichteten Besonderen Ausschuss geführt. oder Pflichten begründet, die vor den Gerichten der Union oder der Mitgliedstaaten unmittelbar geltend gemacht werden kön­ (3) Am 15.
    [Show full text]
  • Het Koninkrijk Tegen Het Licht
    Het Koninkrijk tegen het licht Rechtsvergelijkend onderzoek in opdracht van de Tweede Kamer der Staten- Generaal naar de staatsrechtelijke overzeese verhoudingen in het Koninkrijk der Nederlanden, de Franse Republiek, het Koninkrijk Denemarken en het Verenigd Koninkrijk van Groot-Brittannië en Noord-Ierland prof. mr. H.G. Hoogers mr. G. Karapetian april 2019 INHOUDSOPGAVE Inleiding en aanleiding tot het onderzoek 3 Hoofdstuk 1 Het Koninkrijk der Nederlanden 7 §1. Inleiding 7 §2. Een smalle rechtsband 8 §3. Democratische vertegenwoordiging 9 §4. Sociaaleconomische verhoudingen 10 §5. Financiën 11 §6. Defensie en openbare orde 11 §7. De beslechting van geschillen 13 Hoofdstuk 2 De Franse Republiek 16 §1. Inleiding 16 §2. Les collectivités territoriales: DrOM, COM en Nieuw-Caledonië 17 §3. Democratische vertegenwoordiging 21 §4. Sociaaleconomische verhouding en financiën 22 §5. Defensie en openbare orde 23 §6. De beslechting van geschillen 23 §7. Conclusie 24 Hoofdstuk 3 Het Koninkrijk Denemarken 25 §1. Inleiding; de structuur van het Deense Rijk 25 §2. De rechtsband tussen Denemarken en de beide andere Rijksdelen 29 §3. Democratische vertegenwoordiging 30 §4. Sociaaleconomische verhoudingen 31 §5. Financiën en openbare orde 31 §6. Defensie 31 §7. De beslechting van geschillen 32 §8. Conclusie 33 Hoofdstuk 4 Het Verenigd Koninkrijk van Groot-Brittannië en Noord-Ierland 35 §1. Inleiding 35 §2. Veertien Constituties voor veertien British Overseas Territories 37 §3. Democratische vertegenwoordiging 39 §4. Sociaaleconomische verhouding en financiën 41 §5. Defensie en openbare orde 42 §6. De beslechting van geschillen 42 §7. Conclusie 43 Hoofdstuk 5. Conclusies 44 §1. De structuur van de staatkundige relaties 44 §2. Democratische vertegenwoordiging 46 §3.
    [Show full text]
  • Tekst Zrewidowanego Porozumienia
    ISSN 1977-0766 Dziennik Urzędowy L 68 Unii Europejskiej Tom 57 Wydanie polskie Legislacja 7 marca 2014 Spis treści II Akty o charakterze nieustawodawczym UMOWY MIĘDZYNARODOWE 2014/115/UE: ★ Decyzja Rady z dnia 2 grudnia 2013 r. dotycząca zawarcia Protokołu zmieniającego Porozu­ mienie w sprawie zamówień rządowych . 1 Protokół zmieniający Porozumienie w sprawie zamówień rządowych . 2 Cena: 10 EUR Akty, których tytuły wydrukowano zwykłą czcionką, odnoszą się do bieżącego zarządzania sprawami rolnictwa i generalnie zachowują ważność przez określony czas. Tytuły wszystkich innych aktów poprzedza gwiazdka, a drukuje się je czcionką pogrubioną. PL 7.3.2014 PL Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej L 68/1 II (Akty o charakterze nieustawodawczym) UMOWY MIĘDZYNARODOWE DECYZJA RADY z dnia 2 grudnia 2013 r. dotycząca zawarcia Protokołu zmieniającego Porozumienie w sprawie zamówień rządowych (2014/115/UE) RADA UNII EUROPEJSKIEJ, PRZYJMUJE NINIEJSZĄ DECYZJĘ: uwzględniając Traktat o funkcjonowaniu Unii Europejskiej, Artykuł 1 w szczególności jego art. 207 ust. 4 akapit pierwszy w związku z art. 218 ust. 6 lit. a) ppkt (v), Protokół zmieniający Porozumienie w sprawie zamówień rządo­ wych zostaje niniejszym zatwierdzony w imieniu Unii Europej­ skiej. uwzględniając wniosek Komisji Europejskiej, Tekst Protokołu jest załączony do niniejszej decyzji. uwzględniając zgodę Parlamentu Europejskiego, Artykuł 2 a także mając na uwadze, co następuje: Przewodniczący Rady wyznacza osobę lub osoby umocowane do złożenia instrumentu akceptacji w imieniu Unii, jak okre­ (1) Negocjacje dotyczące rewizji Porozumienia w sprawie ślono w ust. 3 Protokołu oraz zgodnie z art. XXIV ust. 9 GPA zamówień rządowych (w ramach GPA z 1994 r.) zostały z 1994 r., w celu wyrażenia zgody Unii Europejskiej na zwią­ zainicjowane w styczniu 1999 r.
    [Show full text]
  • The European Union, Its Overseas Territories and Non-Proliferation: the Case of Arctic Yellowcake
    eU NoN-ProliferatioN CoNsortiUm The European network of independent non-proliferation think tanks NoN-ProliferatioN PaPers No. 25 January 2013 THE EUROPEAN UNION, ITS OVERSEAS TERRITORIES AND NON-PROLIFERATION: THE CASE OF ARCTIC YELLOWCAKE cindy vestergaard I. INTRODUCTION SUMMARY There are 26 countries and territories—mainly The European Union (EU) Strategy against Proliferation of small islands—outside of mainland Europe that Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD Strategy) has been have constitutional ties with a European Union applied unevenly across EU third-party arrangements, (EU) member state—either Denmark, France, the hampering the EU’s ability to mainstream its non- proliferation policies within and outside of its borders. Netherlands or the United Kingdom.1 Historically, This inconsistency is visible in the EU’s current approach since the establishment of the Communities in 1957, to modernizing the framework for association with its the EU’s relations with these overseas countries and overseas countries and territories (OCTs). territories (OCTs) have focused on classic development The EU–OCT relationship is shifting as these islands needs. However, the approach has been changing over grapple with climate change and a drive toward sustainable the past decade to a principle of partnership focused and inclusive development within a globalized economy. on sustainable development and global issues such While they are not considered islands of proliferation as poverty eradication, climate change, democracy, concern, effective non-proliferation has yet to make it to human rights and good governance. Nevertheless, their shores. Including EU non-proliferation principles is this new and enhanced partnership has yet to address therefore a necessary component of modernizing the EU– the EU’s non-proliferation principles and objectives OCT relationship.
    [Show full text]
  • Aruba Country Profile Health in the Americas 2007
    Aruba Netherlands Antilles Colombia ARUBA Venezuela 02010 Miles Aruba Netherlands Oranjestad^ Antilles Curaçao Venezuela he island of Aruba is located at 12°30' North and 70° West and lies about 32 km from the northern coast of Venezuela. It is the smallest and most western island of a group of three Dutch Leeward Islands, the “ABC islands” of Aruba, Bonaire, and Curaçao. T 2 Aruba is 31 km long and 8 km wide and encompasses an area of 180 km . GENERAL CONTEXT AND HEALTH traction of 2.4% is projected (Table 1). While Aruba has made DETERMINANTS considerable progress toward alleviating poverty, available data suggest that income inequality is still considerably larger than in Aruba’s capital is Oranjestad,and the island divides geograph- countries with comparable income levels. ically into eight districts: Noord/Tanki Leendert,Oranjestad-West, According to the Centrale Bank van Aruba, at the end of 2005, Oranjestad-East, Paradera, Santa Cruz, Savaneta, San Nicolas- inflation stood at 3.8%, compared to 2.8% a year earlier. Mea- North, and San Nicolas-South. The average temperature is 28°C sured as a 12-month average percentage change,the inflation rate with a cooling northeast tradewind. Rainfall averages about accelerated by nearly 1% to 3.4% in 2005, reflecting mainly price 500 mm a year, with October, November, December, and January increases for water, electricity, and gasoline following the rise in accounting for most of it. Aruba lies outside the hurricane belt oil prices on the international market. At the end of 2005, the and at most experiences only fringe effects of nearby heavy trop- overall economy continued to show an upward growth trend ical storms.
    [Show full text]
  • Peer Review Report Phase 2 Implementation of the Standard In
    Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information GLOBAL FORUM ON TRANSPARENCY AND EXCHANGE for Tax Purposes OF INFORMATION FOR TAX PURPOSES PEER REVIEWS, PHASE 2: ARUBA This report contains a “Phase 2: Implementation of the Standards in Practice” review, as well as revised version of the “Phase 1: Legal and Regulatory Framework review” already released for this country. The Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information for Tax Purposes is the Peer Review Report multilateral framework within which work in the area of tax transparency and exchange of information is carried out by over 120 jurisdictions which participate in the work of the Phase 2 Global Forum on an equal footing. The Global Forum is charged with in-depth monitoring and peer review of the implementation Implementation of the Standard of the standards of transparency and exchange of information for tax purposes. These standards are primarily refl ected in the 2002 OECD Model Agreement on Exchange of in Practice Information on Tax Matters and its commentary, and in Article 26 of the OECD Model Tax Convention on Income and on Capital and its commentary as updated in 2004, which has ARUBA been incorporated in the UN Model Tax Convention. Peer Review Report Phase 2 Implementation of the Standard in Practice The standards provide for international exchange on request of foreseeably relevant information for the administration or enforcement of the domestic tax laws of a requesting party. “Fishing expeditions” are not authorised, but all foreseeably relevant information must be provided, including bank information and information held by fi duciaries, regardless of the existence of a domestic tax interest or the application of a dual criminality standard.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of the Second Chamber in European States
    Strasbourg, 1 March/1er mars 2006 CDL(2006)011 Or. Bil. Study No. 335/2005 EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) COMMISSION EUROPEENNE POUR LA DEMOCRATIE PAR LE DROIT (COMMISSION DE VENISE) THE ROLE OF THE SECOND CHAMBER IN EUROPEAN STATES LE ROLE DE LA DEUXIEME CHAMBRE DANS LES ETATS EUROPEENS CONTRIBUTIONS BY VENICE COMMISSION MEMBERS CONTRIBUTIONS DES MEMBRES DE LA COMMISSION DE VENISE This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy. Ce document ne sera pas distribué en réunion. Prière de vous munir de cet exemplaire. CDL(2006)011 - 2 - TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE DES MATIERES Page THE SECOND CHAMBERS OF PARLIAMENT, by Christoph Grabenwarter, Constitutional Court, Vienna, Substitute Member, Austria......................................................................................3 LE SENAT DE BELGIQUE, par Jean-Claude Scholsem, Université de Liège, Membre, Belgique ..............................................................................................................................................7 ROLE OF THE SECOND HOUSE OF THE PARLIAMENTARY ASSEMBLY OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA, by Cazim Sadikovic, University of Sarajevo, Member, Bosnia and Herzegovina......................................................................................................................................12 THE ROLE OF THE SECOND CHAMBER IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC: THE SENATE OF THE PARLIAMENT OF THE CZECH REPUBLIC, by Eliska Wagnerova, Constitutional Court, Brno, Member, Czech Republic...........................................................................................16
    [Show full text]
  • Bio Drs. Rendolf A. (Andy) Lee in a 25-Year Career Serving Land Aruba Mr
    Bio Drs. Rendolf A. (Andy) Lee In a 25-year career serving Land Aruba Mr. Andy Lee held several positions in the civil service and in politics of Aruba. Mr. Lee is currently counselor to the Prime Minister of Aruba. Prior to this position he represented Aruba as Minister Plenipotentiary in Washington, DC. He was the Director of the Department of Foreign Affairs of Aruba and served also as the Director of the Central Bureau of Statistics of Aruba. Mr. Lee served as a Member of Parliament in the 7th and 8th Parliament of Aruba from 2005 to 2011 and was Speaker of the Aruban Parliament from 2009 to 2010. His focus in Parliament was on Public Finance, Foreign Affairs and Kingdom Affairs, Education, Financial and Economic Affairs, and on Tourism. Mr. Andy Lee was born and raised in Aruba. After finishing high school in Aruba, he studied Political Science in The Netherlands. He has been married to Mrs. Margriet Lee - Tromp since 1992. They have two daughters, Kristel (1995) and Hannah (1997). Education Political Science (MA) at the University of Amsterdam (1993) Major in Comparative and International Politics Minors in Political Theory and in Politics and Business Civil Service Career 2018 - Advisor to Prime Minster of Aruba 2014 – 2018 Minister Plenipotentiary for Aruba in Washington, DC 2012 – 2014 Director Department of Foreign Affairs Aruba 2002 – 2005 Chairman Committee on Population and Development Aruba 1995 – 2005 Director of the Central Bureau of Statistics of Aruba 1994 – 1995 Policy Officer at the Department of Economic Affairs of Curacao 1994 Researcher at the Central Bureau of Statistics of Aruba Political Career Member of the 7th and 8th Parliament of Aruba, from 2005 to 2011 Representative of the Christian Democratic Party 2010 – 2011 Assigned Committees: Education; Tourism; Financial and Economic Affairs; Public Finance; Judiciary; Chairman – Foreign Affairs and Kingdom Affairs 2009 - 2010 Speaker of the Parliament of Aruba 2005 – 2009 Assigned Committees: Education; Tourism; Public Finance; Chairman - Financial and Economic Affairs .
    [Show full text]
  • Country Compendium
    Country Compendium A companion to the English Style Guide July 2021 Translation © European Union, 2011, 2021. The reproduction and reuse of this document is authorised, provided the sources and authors are acknowledged and the original meaning or message of the texts are not distorted. The right holders and authors shall not be liable for any consequences stemming from the reuse. CONTENTS Introduction ...............................................................................1 Austria ......................................................................................3 Geography ................................................................................................................... 3 Judicial bodies ............................................................................................................ 4 Legal instruments ........................................................................................................ 5 Government bodies and administrative divisions ....................................................... 6 Law gazettes, official gazettes and official journals ................................................... 6 Belgium .....................................................................................9 Geography ................................................................................................................... 9 Judicial bodies .......................................................................................................... 10 Legal instruments .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Student Research Exchange Collected Papers 2017
    Student Research Exchange Exchange Research Student Collected Papers 2017 Papers Collected Student Research Exchange Collected Papers 2017 ISBN/EAN: ISBN/EAN: Student Research Exchange Collected Papers 2017 This is the digital version of the UAUCU 2017 Student Research Exchange Papers. Due to editorial motives, blank pages for final print have not been removed from this document. UAUCU Student Research Exchange Collected Papers 2017 UAUCU Student Research Exchange Collected Papers 2017 Louisa Maxwell Yun Lee Tanya Kirchner Melany Llocclla Zita Ngizwenayo Rachel Tromp Rotem Zilber Larisa Leeuwe Ben Bultrini William Cruice Rodolfo Rodriguez Nayla Yarzagaray Introduction to the third edition of the UAUCU Student Research Exchange Collected Papers This volume presents academic papers and personal Some of the student-researchers are still working on the reflections written by the twelve participants of the UAUCU interpretation and presentation of their findings, and will student research exchange project 2017. The texts in this later finalize project papers, or bachelor or master theses, volume reflect a wide diversity of academic disciplines based on results of fieldwork presented. and approaches, as well as the wide diversity in cultural background of this year’s participant cohort. The program, Our 2017 multidisciplinary team is also remarkably which offers students from the University of Aruba multicultural: it includes students with personal connec- (UA), University College Utrecht (UCU) and University tions not only to Aruba, but to Belgium, Colombia, Utrecht (UU) the opportunity to conduct research in a Curaçao, Holland, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Myanmar, Russia, multidisciplinary international student team, has already Rwanda, South Korea, Thailand, the United States and proven to be a successful formula: work presented in the Venezuela.
    [Show full text]
  • 2013 Report of the Kingdom of the Netherlands, Aruba, Curaçao and St Maarten to the United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD)
    2013 Report of the Kingdom of the Netherlands, Aruba, Curaçao and St Maarten to the United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD) Contents Part I – Introduction (concl. observs. 15, 21, 22 and 23) ....................................................... 2 Part II – Responses to concluding observations of the CERD ............................................... 3 6. National measures to tackle discrimination, racism and xenophobia (concl. observs. 4 and 17) .............................................................................................................................. 3 7. Civic integration and general integration policy (concl. observ. 4, 5 and 6) .................... 5 8. Combating segregation in education (concl. observ. 7) ................................................. 6 9. Racism, xenophobia and political intolerance (concl. observ. 8) .................................... 8 10. Discrimination on the internet and in the media (concl. observ. 9) ..............................10 11. Acts of violence due to racism (concl. Observ. 10) .....................................................11 12. Asylum-seeking families (concl. observ. 11) ...............................................................12 13. Discrimination and racism at work (concl. observ. 12 and 22), discrimination and marginalisation in the areas of education, health and housing (concl. observ. 14) and discrimination at fitness centres, catering establishments and places of entertainment (concl. observ. 13) ............................................................................................................13
    [Show full text]