DOCSLIB.ORG

Instructions to Proponents Valley Line

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Instructions to Proponents Valley Line REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS NO. 921382 VOLUME 1 of 2: INSTRUCTIONS TO PROPONENTS VALLEY LINE LRT – STAGE 1 10 September 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS VOLUME 1 – INSTRUCTIONS TO PROPONENTS 1. DOCUMENT OVERVIEW AND INITIAL PROCESS ITEMS ..................................................................................... 5 1.1 Participation Agreement ........................................................................................................................ 5 1.2 RFP Documents ...................................................................................................................................... 5 1.3 Rules of Engagement .............................................................................................................................. 6 1.4 RFP Initiation Information ...................................................................................................................... 7 1.5 RFP Administration Portal & Data Room ................................................................................................ 7 1.6 Restricted Parties ................................................................................................................................... 9 1.7 Fairness Monitor .................................................................................................................................. 12 1.8 Conflict of Interest Adjudicator ............................................................................................................ 13 1.9 Governance .......................................................................................................................................... 13 1.10 Project Funding .................................................................................................................................... 14 1.11 Honoraria.............................................................................................................................................. 14 2. PROCESS REQUIREMENTS ............................................................................................................................... 15 2.1 Timetable Overview ............................................................................................................................. 15 2.2 Initiation ............................................................................................................................................... 17 2.3 Collaborative Process ........................................................................................................................... 19 2.4 Submission Requirements and Delivery Instructions ........................................................................... 24 2.5 Mandatory Requirements .................................................................................................................... 24 2.6 Early Submissions ................................................................................................................................. 24 2.7 Technical Proposals (VLS‐2, VLS‐2B) ..................................................................................................... 26 2.8 Financial Proposal (VLS‐3) .................................................................................................................... 30 2.9 Evaluation Procedures .......................................................................................................................... 32 2.10 Borehole Testing Program .................................................................................................................... 34 2.11 Project Site Access ................................................................................................................................ 36 2.12 Financial Close & Commercial Close Process ....................................................................................... 36 2.13 Other Process Instructions ................................................................................................................... 37 3. PROJECT AGREEMENT OVERVIEW ‐ DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS ..................................... 42 3.1 Part 1 – General Conditions (Schedule 5) ............................................................................................. 42 3.2 Part 2 – Sustainable Urban Integration (Schedule 5) ........................................................................... 45 i 3.3 Part 3 – Civil (Schedule 5) ..................................................................................................................... 47 3.4 Part 4 – Transportation and Building Structures .................................................................................. 48 3.5 Part 5 – Facilities .................................................................................................................................. 49 3.6 Part 6 – Systems ................................................................................................................................... 50 3.7 Part 7 – Light Rail Vehicles.................................................................................................................... 50 4. PROJECT AGREEMENT OVERVIEW ‐ OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS .............................. 51 4.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 51 4.2 Operating Period Joint Committee ....................................................................................................... 52 4.3 Maintenance and Asset Management, Monitoring and Reporting ..................................................... 52 4.4 Operational Performance Reporting .................................................................................................... 52 4.5 Service Requirements ........................................................................................................................... 52 4.6 System Safety Program ........................................................................................................................ 53 4.7 Operations Requirements .................................................................................................................... 53 4.8 Remote Data Queries ........................................................................................................................... 54 4.9 Maintenance Requirements ................................................................................................................. 54 4.10 Asset Specific Maintenance Requirements .......................................................................................... 54 4.11 Operations and Maintenance Manual ................................................................................................. 55 5. PROJECT AGREEMENT OVERVIEW – OTHER REQUIREMENTS ........................................................................ 56 5.1 Lands .................................................................................................................................................... 56 5.2 Environmental and Historical Resources .............................................................................................. 56 5.3 Permits and Approvals ......................................................................................................................... 57 5.4 Working in the River Valley ‐ Tunnel and Slope Stability ..................................................................... 57 5.5 Railways ................................................................................................................................................ 58 5.6 System Expansion ................................................................................................................................. 59 5.7 Insurance .............................................................................................................................................. 59 5.8 Quality Requirements ........................................................................................................................... 60 5.9 Public Art .............................................................................................................................................. 60 5.10 102 Avenue ........................................................................................................................................... 60 5.11 95 Street Development ........................................................................................................................ 61 5.12 Development Charges .......................................................................................................................... 61 6. PROJECT AGREEMENT OVERVIEW ‐ TRANSACTION STRUCTURE AND PAYMENT MECHANISM ..................... 62 6.1 Overview .............................................................................................................................................. 62 ii 6.2 Timing ................................................................................................................................................... 62 6.3 Compliance ........................................................................................................................................... 62 6.4 Payment Mechanism ...........................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • AECOM Top Projects 2017
    AECOM Top Projects 2017 #13 Turcot Interchange #6 Romaine Complex #59 Region of Waterloo ION LRT #53 Giant Mine Remediation #65 Lions Gate Secondary Wastewater Treatment Plant #82 Wilson Facility Enhancement and Yard Expansion AECOM Top Projects 2017 With $186.4 billion invested in Canada’s Top100 Projects of 2017, the country is experiencing record investment in creating AECOM Top Projects 2017 and improving public sector infrastructure from coast-to-coast. Those investments are creating tens of thousands of jobs and providing a foundation for the country’s growing economy. EDITOR In 2017, AECOM again showed why it is a leader in Canada’s Andrew Macklin infrastructure industry. In this year’s edition of the ReNew Canada Top100 projects report, AECOM was involved in PUBLISHER 29 of the 100 largest public sector infrastructure projects, Todd Latham one of just a handful of businesses to reach our Platinum Elite status. Those 29 projects represented just under $61.5 billion, close to one-third of the $186.4 billion list. ART DIRECTOR & DESIGN Donna Endacott AECOM’s involvement on the Top100 stretches across multiple sectors, working on big infrastructure projects in the transit, ASSOCIATE EDITOR energy, transportation, health care and water/wastewater Katherine Balpatasky sectors. That speaks to the strength of the team that the company has built in Canada to deliver transformational assets across a multitude of industries. Through these projects, AECOM has also shown its leadership in both putting together teams, and working as a member of a team, to help produce the best project possible for the client. As a company that prides itself on its ability “to develop and implement innovative solutions to the world’s most complex challenges,” they have shown they are willing to work with AECOM is built to deliver a better all involved stakeholders to create the greatest possible world.
    [Show full text]
  • Dayton, Ohio Invests in High Tech Trolleybuses with In-Motion Charging
    Published by the Electric Traction Committee, Edmonton Trolley Coalition Edited by Retired Employees of the Edmonton Transit Service VOL. 36 Adopting Tomorrow’s Technology Today: Dayton, Ohio invests in High Tech Trolleybuses with In-Motion Charging After lengthy testing, the Greater Dayton Regional Transit Authority (GDRTA) is buying 26 NexGen Electric Trolleys and will put the first production model in service by 2019. The RTA Board authorized spending up to $57.4 million for the 26 vehicles and parts, plus 15 more NexGen Trolleys that will be bought once federal funding is in place, Executive Director Mark Donaghy told reporters. It is the largest bus contract in RTA history. The NexGen Electric Trolleybus bus costs 63 percent more than a standard diesel transit bus, but has a 20-year, 800,000 mile life compared to the diesel’s 12-year, 500,000 mile life, Donaghy said. Electric trolleys are cheaper to operate, better for the environment and quieter than a diesel bus, he explained. “Using electric instead of diesel buses is a step towards a clean air environment for Dayton,” said Peggy Ann Berry, an occupational safety and health professional and Climate Reality Project leader in Dayton. “Diesel buses release dirty fossil fuel emissions into the environment. These emissions exacerbate asthma attacks as well as add to the cardiac burden of older adults.” RTA is now finalizing the cost of the NexGen after making several modifications to the prototype. The US Federal Transit Administration (FTA) is picking up 80 percent of the cost, and the rest comes from the local sales tax and rider fares.
    [Show full text]
  • No. 5, Eglinton Crosstown LRT, Page 18 Credit: Metrolinx
    2020 No. 5, Eglinton Crosstown LRT, Page 18 Credit: Metrolinx Top100 Projects 2020 One Man Changes the Face of 2020’s Top 10 Top100 Projects — 2020 f not for one individual, this year’s Top100 may have looked An annual report inserted in familiar. ReNew Canada’s I When this year’s research process began, there was little change within this year’s Top 10, as many of the nation’s January/February 2020 issue megaprojects were still in progress. Significant progress has been made on all of the projects we saw grace the Top 10 in our report last year, but completion dates extend beyond the end of the MANAGING Andrew Macklin 2019 calendar year. EDITOR [email protected] Enter Matt Clark, Metrolinx’s Chief Capital Officer, who took GROUP over the position from Peter Zuk. You see, when Zuk was in charge Todd Latham PUBLISHER of publicly expressing capital budgets, particularly in the context of the GO Expansion project, he had done so by breaking down PUBLISHER Nick Krukowski the $13.5 billion spend by corridor. That breakdown led to the full expansion represented by as many as nine projects in the content ART DIRECTOR AND Donna Endacott SENIORDESIGN of the Top100. Clark does it differently. In the quarterly reports made public ASSOCIATE following Metrolinx board meetings, the capital projects for the Simran Chattha EDITOR GO Expansion are broken down into three allotments (on corridor, off corridor, and early works). The result? Six less GO Expansion CONTENT AND MARKETING Todd Westcott projects in the Top100, but two new projects in our Top 10 MANAGER including a new number one.
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Rail I
    Canadian Rail i No. 288 January 1976 I -- -----1l. ElN THE Sl1B Hal Riegger Photos by the Author. round here, they all say that the last train to run over that track was the "National Dream". And, in -R a way, they're right, although the "National Dream" was not a train , but the title of Pierre Berton's novel about the history of an idea that resulted in Canada's first transcontinental railway, known, for simplicity's sake, as the CPR. For ninety years, Canadian Pacific Railway has been in the minds of Canadians and others, and especially in 1974, when a television series, based onMr. Berton's two volumes on the construction of the CPR was- shown in eight installments on television in Canada. People around Penticton, British Columbia and the Carmi Subdivision of the Kootenay Division were and are particularly conscious - and proud, for it was a mere 50 miles away from their town that filming of some of the most spectacular country was done for the television series. Ex-Canadian Pacific steam locomotive Number 136, a 4-4-0, lea­ sed from Ontario Rail Association of Brampton, Ontario and fitted with a mushroom stack for the occasion, with a boxcar, baggage car and coach of early vintage, was brought all the way out west, via Crowsnest Pass, along CP RAIL's tracks in southern British Columbia. This was during the summer of 1973. THE MOST APPROPRIATE EXPLANATION OF THIS MONTH'S PECULIAR COVER LIES in the brief note which accompanied it: "This picture, which may in- terest you, was taken on June 30, 1974 at Crowsnest, B.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Progress on Edmonton's Valley Line
    Progress on Edmonton’s Valley Line LRT – General Project Update Moderator Georg Josi, DIALOG Design Review Manager Owner’s Engineer – connectEd Transit Partnership Panel Chris Gentile City of Edmonton Technical Manager Valley Line Stage 1 B.Sc., M.Sc., University of Manitoba Panel Josh Jones AECOM Project Manager Valley Line Stage 1 Owner’s Engineer – connectEd Transit Partnership Panel Johanna Hoyt EllisDon Design Project Manager Valley Line Stage 1 TransEd Partners Panel Colin Hill EllisDon Deputy Project Director Valley Line Stage 1 TransEd Partners LRT Development in Edmonton 6 LRT Development in Edmonton 7 LRT Development in Edmonton Capital Line Clareview to University of Alberta 1978 - 1992 Capital Line – Extension University of Alberta to Century Park 2006 - 2010 Metro Line University of Alberta to NAIT 2015 Edmonton’s LRT Vision 9 Edmonton’s LRT Vision Edmonton’s Future LRT Network 11 Edmonton’s LRT Expansion Valley Line - Stage 1 Downtown to Mill Woods 2020 Valley Line - Stage 2 Downtown to Lewis Farms Beyond 2020 Metro Line NAIT to Blatchford Beyond 2020 Balance of LRT Network Multiple Line Expansions 2025 - 2040 Valley Line - Stage 1 Overall Plan Low floor, urban-style LRT line 13 km 11 At-grade Stops 1 Elevated Station Interchange at Churchill Station (Downtown) 1 Tunnel 2 LRT Bridges 2 Elevated Guideways 2 Pedestrian Bridges 1 O&M Facility Valley Line - Stage 1 14 Valley Line - Stage 1 Scope • 13 km Line running from Millwoods Town Centre Mall in the South East of Edmonton to 102 Ave and 102 Street in Downtown Edmonton •
    [Show full text]
  • IBI Group to Lead Hurontario LRT Design As Part of Mobilinx
    Media Contact: Julia Harper, IBI Group [email protected] 1-416-596-1930 ext. 61187 or 1-647-330-4706 - For immediate release - IBI Group to Lead Hurontario LRT Design as Part of Mobilinx Preferred Proponent Consortium – Global design and technology firm will lead multidisciplinary team on major GTA transit infrastructure project – TORONTO, ON (September 3, 2019) – Infrastructure Ontario (IO) and Metrolinx announced on August 26 that Mobilinx is the preferred proponent to design, build, finance, operate and maintain the Hurontario Light Rail Transit (LRT) project. IBI Group (TSX:IBG) will be leading the design team as part of this significant project expected to commence in the fall of 2019. The Hurontario LRT will provide 18km of rapid transit to the cities of Mississauga and Brampton, addressing transportation demand and enhancing the urban environment. The project adds to the firm’s global expertise designing transit infrastructure, including current projects Eglinton Crosstown LRT, Edmonton Valley Line LRT, Ottawa Confederation Line, and the Tel Aviv Light Rail Red Line. “Our leadership role within the Mobilinx team reaffirms our position as experts in world-class transit infrastructure design,” said Scott Stewart, IBI Group CEO. “I am very proud of our team whose experience and leadership have brought us to this stage on this prestigious project, and whose track record working with the consortium partners have encouraged Mobilinx to embrace design as an integral part of the project.” As design lead, IBI Group will be managing a multidisciplinary team of architecture and engineering partners. The firm will be leveraging its roster of design technology tools to streamline the collaboration across disciplines and teams, and to ensure an efficient digital design process that will aid Mobilinx with future maintenance and management of the project.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Line: Update on Funding, Staging and Delivery ATTACHMENT 1
    TT2015-0881 Green Line: Update on Funding, Staging and Delivery ATTACHMENT 1 Green Line Update on Funding, Staging and Delivery December 2015 Revision1.0 TT2015-0881 GREEN LINE FUNDING STAGING AND DELIVERY/Att1.pdf Page 1 of 97 ISC: Unrestricted Green Line: Update on Funding, Staging and Delivery TT2015-0881 GREEN LINE FUNDING STAGING AND DELIVERY/Att1.pdf Page 2 of 97 ISC: Unrestricted Green Line: Update on Funding, Staging and Delivery CONTENTS 1. THE GREEN LINE: CALGARY’S NEXT LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT LINE ..............................................4 2. MOBILITY STRATEGY .......................................................................................................................6 3. GREEN LINE CORRIDOR ................................................................................................................16 4. GREEN LINE PROJEct ...................................................................................................................24 5. QUANTIFYING THE INVESTMENT IN THE GREEN LINE ............................................................32 6. FINDINGS FROM A SCAN OF CANADIAN CITIES .....................................................................40 7. FUNDING AND FINANCING .........................................................................................................45 8. STAGING OPTIONS ........................................................................................................................56 9. RETURN ON INVESTMENT ............................................................................................................60
    [Show full text]
  • March 2004 Bulletin.Pub
    TheNEW YORK DIVISION BULLETIN - MARCH, 2004 Bulletin New York Division, Electric Railroaders’ Association Vol. 47, No. 3 March, 2004 The Bulletin BROOKLYN BRIDGE “L” SERVICE QUIT 60 YEARS Published by the New York Division, Electric AGO Railroaders’ Association, Incorporated, PO Box On March 5, 1944, BMT elevated trains furnished through service to midtown Man- 3001, New York, New ceased operating across the Brooklyn Bridge hattan. Because riding declined and service York 10008-3001. to Park Row. The Sands Street and Adams was curtailed in the 1920s and 1930s, the Street stations were abandoned, and trains elaborate Park Row terminal’s tail switch For general inquiries, were turned at a new terminal, Bridge-Jay tracks and exit platforms were no longer contact us at Street. A double crossover was installed east needed. Starting November 27, 1935, trains [email protected] or by of this station, formerly called Bridge Street. terminated at the easterly platforms and phone at (212) 986-4482 The west end of the platform was extended switched back on a new double crossover (voice mail available). ERA’s website is and a new entrance was built at Jay Street east of the station. The structure supporting www.electricrailroaders. and Myrtle Avenue, where passengers could the tail switch tracks and the exit platforms org. transfer to the trolley cars or the IND subway. was demolished. Editorial Staff: Editor-in-Chief: Bernard Linder News Editor: Randy Glucksman Contributing Editor: Jeffrey Erlitz Production Manager: David Ross Park Row looking south, after exit platforms were removed in the mid-1930s. ©2004 New York Bernard Linder collection Division, Electric Park Row looking south, before exit platforms were Railroaders’ removed.
    [Show full text]
  • Valley Line West Downtown to Lewis Farms
    VALLEY LINE WEST DOWNTOWN TO LEWIS FARMS Spring 2019 CONTENTS The Future of Edmonton.................3 Glenwood/Sherwood Stop . 27 West Jasper Place/Glenwood . .28 LRT Network Plan...................... 4 Jasper Place Stop . 29 The Project .............................5 Stony Plain Road/149 St . Stop . 30 Low-Floor LRT..........................6 Grovenor/142 St . Stop . 31 Glenora . 32 Sustainable Urban Integration . .7 Glenora Stop . 33 Valley Line West and the Environment .. 8 Westmount . 34 Public Engagement: Ongoing . 9 124 Street and Brewery/120 St . Stop . 35 The Yards/116 St . Stop . 36 What We Heard . .10 MacEwan Arts/112 St . Stop . 37 Indigenous Engagement................10 Downtown Stops . 38 Public Art Policy .......................11 What Happens Next? / Public Engagement to Date ......... 12-13 More Information .....................40 Urban LRT Stop ........................14 Map Explanation and Disclaimers . .15 Lewis Farms . 16 Designs of all elements pictured in images/renderings remain subject to Anthony Henday Drive . 17 further refinement and should not be considered final. Belmead/Aldergrove . 18 Aldergrove/Belmead Stop . 19 178 Street . 20 West Edmonton Mall Station . 21-22 Misericordia Station . .22-23 Meadowlark Park . 24 Meadowlark Stop . 25 Meadowlark Park/Sherwood . 26 2 THE FUTURE OF EDMONTON Welcome to the Valley Line LRT: a low-floor, community-integrated transit system that will unite our city as never before. Why ‘Valley Line’? Well, in creating Edmonton’s first completely new LRT line, we wanted to highlight a special feature of our city: the ribbon of green that threads its way through the heart of Edmonton, binding our city together . The Valley Line is all about staying connected, with more frequent and more accessible stops that allow you to access all the communities along the line— not just the hot spots .
    [Show full text]
  • Canada Rail Opportunities Scoping Report Preface
    01 Canada Rail Opportunities Canada Rail Opportunities Scoping Report Preface Acknowledgements Photo and image credits The authors would like to thank the Agence Métropolitaine de Transport following organisations for their help and British Columbia Ministry of Transportation support in the creation of this publication: and Infrastructure Agence Métropolitaine de Transport BC Transit Alberta Ministry of Transport Calgary Transit Alberta High Speed Rail City of Brampton ARUP City of Hamilton Balfour Beatty City of Mississauga Bombardier City of Ottawa Calgary Transit Edmonton Transit Canadian National Railway Helen Hemmingsen, UKTI Toronto Canadian Urban Transit Association Metrolinx Edmonton Transit OC Transpo GO Transit Sasha Musij, UKTI Calgary Metrolinx Société de Transport de Montréal RailTerm TransLink SNC Lavalin Toronto Transit Commission Toronto Transit Commission Wikimedia Commons Wikipedia Front cover image: SkyTrain in Richmond, Vancouver Canada Rail Opportunities Contents Preface Foreword 09 About UK Trade & Investment 10 High Value Opportunities Programme 11 Executive Summary 12 1.0 Introduction 14 2.0 Background on Canada 15 2.1 Macro Economic Review 16 2.2 Public-Private Partnerships 18 3.0 Overview of the Canadian Rail Sector 20 4.0 Review of Urban Transit Operations and Opportunities by Province 21 4.1 Summary Table of Existing Urban Transit Rail Infrastructure and Operations 22 4.2 Summary Table of Key Project Opportunities 24 4.3 Ontario 26 4.4 Québec 33 4.5 Alberta 37 4.6 British Columbia 41 5.0 In-Market suppliers 45 5.1 Contractors 45 5.2 Systems and Rolling Stock 48 5.3 Consultants 49 6.0 Concluding Remarks 51 7.0 Annexes 52 7.1 Doing Business in Canada 52 7.2 Abbreviations 53 7.3 Bibliography 54 7.4 List of Reference Websites 56 7.5 How can UKTI Help UK Organisations Succeed in Canada 58 Contact UKTI 59 04 Canada Rail Opportunities About the Authors David Bill Helen Hemmingsen David is the International Helen Hemmingsen is a Trade Officer Development Director for the UK with the British Consulate General Railway Industry Association (RIA).
    [Show full text]
  • Valley Line West LRT Project
    City of Edmonton LRT Expansion and Renewal 19th Floor, MNP Tower Integrated Infrastructure Services 10235 - 101 Street Edmonton, AB T5J 3G1 Bulletin March 4, 2021 City of Edmonton - Valley Line West LRT Project The City of Edmonton has shortlisted three participants in its procurement for 40 light rail vehicles (LRVs) for the Valley Line West LRT project. The City’s Request for Qualifications (RFQ Sourcing Event 2709919135) closed on Feb. 4, 2021. The City received eight submissions which were carefully reviewed by an evaluation committee, shortlisting the following three participants: ● Construcciones Y Auxiliar De Ferrocarriles, S.A. (CAF Group) ● Hyundai Rotem Company ● Siemens Mobility Ltd. The shortlisted participants will be invited to take part in the next stage of the procurement process, which is expected to conclude with the selection of a successful bidder by the end of 2021. The 27-km Valley Line is the City of Edmonton’s largest LRT investment to date, providing continuous transit operations between Mill Woods in the city’s southeast through Downtown to Lewis Farms in west Edmonton. The project is being delivered in two stages: ● Stage One: The 13-km Valley Line Southeast, from Mill Woods to Downtown Edmonton. It is currently under construction and is being delivered as a Public-Private-Partnership. ● Stage Two: Valley Line West, a 14-kilometre LRT extension from Downtown to Lewis Farms, with terminus at Lewis Farms Transit Centre. Following the conclusion of its procurement process, the City selected Marigold Infrastructure Partners for the design-build-finance contract. Construction begins in 2021. The LRVs will provide bidirectional, articulated, low-floor service that is compatible with both stages of the Valley Line, ensuring a seamless rider experience.
    [Show full text]
  • Colas and Parsons to Extend LRT Line in Edmonton, Alberta (Canada)
    PRESS RELEASE Edmonton, January 13 2021 Colas and Parsons to extend LRT line in Edmonton, Alberta (Canada) As part of the Marigold Infrastructure Partners consortium, Colas (managing partner) and Parsons Inc. have been selected by the City of Edmonton, Alberta (Canada) to design, build and finance the Valley Line West LRT project. The contract value amounts to 1.7 billion Canadian dollars (approximately €1 billion), divided as a 50/50 partnership with Colas as the lead. The project involves the design and construction of an extension totalling 14 km that will connect downtown Edmonton to the Lewis Farms neighbourhood, located in the city’s west end. The 14 new stops and two elevated stations will serve key points such as the West Edmonton Mall, Misericordia Hospital, NorQuest College and MacEwan University. The route will include 2.1 km of elevated tracks and two maintenance and storage facilities. Construction is slated to start during the summer of 2021 with delivery scheduled for late 2026. Colas and Parsons are part of a fully integrated team with Colas acting as the managing partner for the delivery of the project. Colas consists of Colas Canada, and its Edmonton subsidiary Standard General, Colas Rail Canada and Colas Projects Canada. Parsons will serve as lead designer and construction partner on the project, leveraging the company’s decades of experience in the rail and transit market. Colas Canada is Canada’s leader in road construction and maintenance. Colas Rail is a global leader in the construction and maintenance of railway infrastructure including trackworks, electrification and systems. Parsons is a technology-driven firm with expertise in engineering, rail transit systems integration and critical infrastructure protection.
    [Show full text]