DOCSLIB.ORG

South Dakota State Rail Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

SOUTH DAKOTA STATE RAIL PLAN VOLUME 2 – TECHNICAL REPORT prepared for South Dakota Department of Transportation prepared by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. with Civil Design Inc September 2014 Table of Contents Table of Contents 1 – A Vision for Rail in South Dakota ................................................................................... 1 Preface ..............................................................................................................................................1 The Role of Rail in Statewide Transportation .............................................................................2 South Dakota State Rail Plan Vision Statement and Goals .......................................................5 2 – State and Local Rail Programs .......................................................................................... 7 Preface ..............................................................................................................................................7 South Dakota Rail History ............................................................................................................8 South Dakota Rail Programs ....................................................................................................... 19 3 – Existing System Description and Infrastructure Inventory ...................................... 29 Preface ............................................................................................................................................ 29 South Dakota Railroads ............................................................................................................... 30 Railroad Infrastructure Features ................................................................................................ 58 South Dakota Rail System Demand – Current and Future ..................................................... 64 4 – Impacts of Rail Transportation ....................................................................................... 99 Preface ............................................................................................................................................ 99 Economic Impacts ...................................................................................................................... 100 Safety Impacts ............................................................................................................................. 116 Environment and Energy Use Considerations ....................................................................... 129 5 – Needs, Issues and Opportunities ................................................................................. 141 Preface .......................................................................................................................................... 141 South Dakota’s Rail System Needs .......................................................................................... 142 South Dakota Rail Plan Supporting Stakeholder Outreach .................................................. 171 6 – Identify Potential Investment Opportunities ............................................................ 175 Preface .......................................................................................................................................... 175 Potential Investment Opportunities ......................................................................................... 176 7 – Rail Investment Framework and Project Evaluations .............................................. 189 Preface .......................................................................................................................................... 189 Rail Investment Framework ...................................................................................................... 190 South Dakota-Owned Rail System Project Evaluation .......................................................... 193 Cambridge Systematics, Inc. South Dakota State Rail Plan | i Table of Contents (continued) 8 – Recommendations .......................................................................................................... 201 Preface ......................................................................................................................................... 201 Recommended South Dakota-Owned Rail System Investments ......................................... 202 Recommended Supporting Strategies ..................................................................................... 207 Appendices A. Summary of South Dakota State Rail Plans B. Listing of South Dakota Regional Rail Authorities C. Demand and Throughput of Grain Elevators in South Dakota Estimation Methodologies ii | South Dakota State Rail Plan Cambridge Systematics, Inc. List of Tables List of Tables Table 1. South Dakota’s Multimodal Transportation System...................................... 2 Table 2. Federal and Matching Funds for Railroad Rehabilitation in South Dakota (LRSA and LRFA Programs) .............................................................. 23 Table 3. Post-LRFA Federal Funding in South Dakota (Various Sources) ............... 26 Table 4. BNSF Railway Operating Details .................................................................... 33 Table 5. BNSF Railway Subdivisions, South Dakota .................................................. 35 Table 6. BNSF Trackage Rights, South Dakota ............................................................ 36 Table 7. Canadian Pacific Operating Details, Prior to DM&E Sale ........................... 37 Table 8. RCP&E Railroad Subdivisions, South Dakota .............................................. 40 Table 9. CP/DM&E (now RCP&E) Trackage Rights, South Dakota ........................ 40 Table 10. D&I Railroad Operating Details ...................................................................... 41 Table 11. D&I Railroad Subdivisions, South Dakota .................................................... 43 Table 12. D&I Railroad Trackage Rights, South Dakota............................................... 44 Table 13. Dakota, Missouri Valley and Western Railroad Operating Details ........... 44 Table 14. Dakota Southern Railway Operating Details ................................................ 46 Table 15. Ellis and Eastern Railroad Operating Details ................................................ 48 Table 16. Sisseton Milbank Railroad Operating Details ............................................... 50 Table 17. Sunflour Railroad Operating Details .............................................................. 52 Table 18. Twin Cities and Western Railroad Operating Details .................................. 54 Table 19. Freight Movements over All Modes by Direction and by Mode, 2011 Weight (Thousands of Tons) ........................................................................... 75 Table 20. Top 15 Commodities, All Modes, 2011 (Millions of Tons) .......................... 77 Table 21. Top 15 Rail Commodities, 2011 (Thousands of Tons) .................................. 80 Table 22. Top Rail Commodities by Direction, 2011 Weight (Thousands of Tons) ................................................................................................................... 85 Table 23. Top 15 Rail Commodities, 2040 Weight (Thousands of Tons) .................... 90 Table 24. Top Rail Commodities by Direction, 2040 Weight (Thousands of Tons) ................................................................................................................... 93 Table 25. Changes in Rail Transportation Employment, Average Annual Employee Compensation and Real GDP Contribution, State versus the U.S., 2002-2012 ........................................................................................... 102 Cambridge Systematics, Inc. South Dakota State Rail Plan | iii List of Tables (continued) Table 26. Changes in Population and Per Capita Income, State versus the U.S., 2002-2012 .......................................................................................................... 106 Table 27. Changes in the Total Employment and Contribution to State’s Real GDP by Industry Group, State versus the U.S., 2002-2012........................ 109 Table 28. Actual Harvested Area and Yield by Top Field Crop in South Dakota, 2002 versus 2012 ............................................................................... 113 Table 29. Data on Rail Incidents and Their Characteristics, State versus the U.S., 2008-2012 ................................................................................................. 117 Table 30. Statewide Top Highway-Rail At-Grade Crossings based on Predicted Collisions Probability, 2008-2012 ................................................ 121 Table 31. Roles and Responsibilities of Various Agencies in Rail Safety and Security ............................................................................................................. 124 Table 32. Goods Movement Sector Contribution to Criteria Pollutants .................. 130 Table 33. GHG Emissions by Fuel Type for Transportation Sector, South Dakota versus U.S., 2010 ................................................................................ 132 Table 34. National Greenhouse Gas Emission Rates for Freight Transportation (g CO2 Eq. per ton-mile) ................................................................................. 133 Table 35. Potential Impacts of Climate Change on South Dakota’s Rail
Recommended publications
  • Sparks and Cinders

    Sparks and Cinders

    Wisconsin Chapter National Railway Historical Society Volume 66 Number 2 February 2016 Sparks and Cinders Our purpose as members of Wisconsin Chapter—National Railway Historical Society is to gather, preserve and disseminate information, both historic and current, pertaining to railroading in Wisconsin and the Upper Midwest. Visit the Chapter Webpage www.nrhswis.org Is this photo showing what will happen. Will the BNSF stand between the Canadian Pacific acquiring the Norfolk Southern. 2016 could be an interesting year for the railroads. This photo was taken at Duplainville, WI on May 16, 2015 Photo by Keith Schmidt In This Issue From the President January Board Meeting Minutes Canadian Pacific RR Frequency Changes 1 Upcoming Events February 2016 Wisconsin Chapter AMRC/MSOE All Star Railroad Night - 34th Season Meeting Schedule MSOE 1025 N Broadway 7:30pm Friday February 12, 2016 “Farewell to Military Railroads” by Sgt. Dave Myers **NOTE SCHEDULE CHANGE ** “Railfanning while going to Work” by Bob Gallegos Friday February 5, 2016 - Dave Nelson - Bucyrus-Erie Factory and its Railroad TMER&THS (Traction and Bus Club) Friday March 4, 2016 - Tom Dannemann - Montana www.tmer.org Friday April 1, 2016 - Bob Baker - To Be Announced Saturday February 20, 2016 Chase Bank - Cudahy 7:30pm MEETINGS NOW START AT 7:30PM !!! SE Corner Packard and Layton Use East Lot Programs Subject to Change “Modern Streetcars and More” by Dave Shtaida If you would like to present a program at a Chapter Meeting Contact Dave Nelson at email [email protected] WISE Division NMRA www.wisedivision.org NO Monthly Meeting January 2016 Meeting Summary February 2016 Midway Hotel and Suite President Dave Nelson called the annual formal business meeting 1005 S Moorland Road to order at 7:34 pm.
  • Minutes of the East Wisconsin Counties Railroad Consortium Meeting of January 27, 2010

    Minutes of the East Wisconsin Counties Railroad Consortium Meeting of January 27, 2010

    Minutes of the East Wisconsin Counties Railroad Consortium Meeting of January 27, 2010 East Wisconsin Counties Railroad Consortium Meeting was called to order by Chairman Jerry Holub on January 27, 2010, at 10:00 a.m., at Portage Country Club, W7245 Country Club Road, Portage, Wisconsin. Certification Of Public Notice: John F. Corey certified that the notice of this meeting complies with all applicable requirements of Wisconsin’s open meetings law. Roll call was taken. Present: Kenneth Hutler and Vern Gove, Columbia County; Russell Kottke and Edwin J. Qualmann, Dodge County; Joseph Koch and Robert Fox, Fond du Lac County; Eugene Henke and Alma Hedberg, Green Lake County; Rose Hass Leider, Ozaukee County; Jerald Holub and Duffy Reimer, Sheboygan County; Rick Gundrum, Washington County; and Stan Kline and Jef Hall, Winnebago County. Excused: Robert Walerstein, Ozaukee County, and Daniel Goetz, Washington County. Others Present: Andy Ross, Columbia County Board of Supervisors; Ollie Mielke, Columbia County Board of Supervisors; Don Pohlman, Mayor for the City of Plymouth; Jerry Thompson, Railroad Services Coordinator for the City of Plymouth; Charles Beck, Citizen; Moe Bohrer and Steve Houis, Michels Corporation; Ken Lucht, WSOR; Roger Larson, Frank Huntington and Sheri Walz, WisDOT Bureau of Railroads and Harbors; Dan Amato, Representative of Columbia County Economic Development; John F. Corey, Dodge County Corporation Counsel; and Kelly L. Lepple, Recording Secretary. Welcome to Columbia County: Ken Hutler and Andy Ross welcomed everyone to Columbia County. Approval of Minutes of November 11, 2009: Motion by Kline/Koch to approve the minutes of the November 11, 2009, meeting, as presented.
  • AECOM Top Projects 2017

    AECOM Top Projects 2017

    AECOM Top Projects 2017 #13 Turcot Interchange #6 Romaine Complex #59 Region of Waterloo ION LRT #53 Giant Mine Remediation #65 Lions Gate Secondary Wastewater Treatment Plant #82 Wilson Facility Enhancement and Yard Expansion AECOM Top Projects 2017 With $186.4 billion invested in Canada’s Top100 Projects of 2017, the country is experiencing record investment in creating AECOM Top Projects 2017 and improving public sector infrastructure from coast-to-coast. Those investments are creating tens of thousands of jobs and providing a foundation for the country’s growing economy. EDITOR In 2017, AECOM again showed why it is a leader in Canada’s Andrew Macklin infrastructure industry. In this year’s edition of the ReNew Canada Top100 projects report, AECOM was involved in PUBLISHER 29 of the 100 largest public sector infrastructure projects, Todd Latham one of just a handful of businesses to reach our Platinum Elite status. Those 29 projects represented just under $61.5 billion, close to one-third of the $186.4 billion list. ART DIRECTOR & DESIGN Donna Endacott AECOM’s involvement on the Top100 stretches across multiple sectors, working on big infrastructure projects in the transit, ASSOCIATE EDITOR energy, transportation, health care and water/wastewater Katherine Balpatasky sectors. That speaks to the strength of the team that the company has built in Canada to deliver transformational assets across a multitude of industries. Through these projects, AECOM has also shown its leadership in both putting together teams, and working as a member of a team, to help produce the best project possible for the client. As a company that prides itself on its ability “to develop and implement innovative solutions to the world’s most complex challenges,” they have shown they are willing to work with AECOM is built to deliver a better all involved stakeholders to create the greatest possible world.
  • Dayton, Ohio Invests in High Tech Trolleybuses with In-Motion Charging

    Dayton, Ohio Invests in High Tech Trolleybuses with In-Motion Charging

    Published by the Electric Traction Committee, Edmonton Trolley Coalition Edited by Retired Employees of the Edmonton Transit Service VOL. 36 Adopting Tomorrow’s Technology Today: Dayton, Ohio invests in High Tech Trolleybuses with In-Motion Charging After lengthy testing, the Greater Dayton Regional Transit Authority (GDRTA) is buying 26 NexGen Electric Trolleys and will put the first production model in service by 2019. The RTA Board authorized spending up to $57.4 million for the 26 vehicles and parts, plus 15 more NexGen Trolleys that will be bought once federal funding is in place, Executive Director Mark Donaghy told reporters. It is the largest bus contract in RTA history. The NexGen Electric Trolleybus bus costs 63 percent more than a standard diesel transit bus, but has a 20-year, 800,000 mile life compared to the diesel’s 12-year, 500,000 mile life, Donaghy said. Electric trolleys are cheaper to operate, better for the environment and quieter than a diesel bus, he explained. “Using electric instead of diesel buses is a step towards a clean air environment for Dayton,” said Peggy Ann Berry, an occupational safety and health professional and Climate Reality Project leader in Dayton. “Diesel buses release dirty fossil fuel emissions into the environment. These emissions exacerbate asthma attacks as well as add to the cardiac burden of older adults.” RTA is now finalizing the cost of the NexGen after making several modifications to the prototype. The US Federal Transit Administration (FTA) is picking up 80 percent of the cost, and the rest comes from the local sales tax and rider fares.
  • No. 5, Eglinton Crosstown LRT, Page 18 Credit: Metrolinx

    No. 5, Eglinton Crosstown LRT, Page 18 Credit: Metrolinx

    2020 No. 5, Eglinton Crosstown LRT, Page 18 Credit: Metrolinx Top100 Projects 2020 One Man Changes the Face of 2020’s Top 10 Top100 Projects — 2020 f not for one individual, this year’s Top100 may have looked An annual report inserted in familiar. ReNew Canada’s I When this year’s research process began, there was little change within this year’s Top 10, as many of the nation’s January/February 2020 issue megaprojects were still in progress. Significant progress has been made on all of the projects we saw grace the Top 10 in our report last year, but completion dates extend beyond the end of the MANAGING Andrew Macklin 2019 calendar year. EDITOR [email protected] Enter Matt Clark, Metrolinx’s Chief Capital Officer, who took GROUP over the position from Peter Zuk. You see, when Zuk was in charge Todd Latham PUBLISHER of publicly expressing capital budgets, particularly in the context of the GO Expansion project, he had done so by breaking down PUBLISHER Nick Krukowski the $13.5 billion spend by corridor. That breakdown led to the full expansion represented by as many as nine projects in the content ART DIRECTOR AND Donna Endacott SENIORDESIGN of the Top100. Clark does it differently. In the quarterly reports made public ASSOCIATE following Metrolinx board meetings, the capital projects for the Simran Chattha EDITOR GO Expansion are broken down into three allotments (on corridor, off corridor, and early works). The result? Six less GO Expansion CONTENT AND MARKETING Todd Westcott projects in the Top100, but two new projects in our Top 10 MANAGER including a new number one.
  • Canadian Rail I

    Canadian Rail I

    Canadian Rail i No. 288 January 1976 I -- -----1l. ElN THE Sl1B Hal Riegger Photos by the Author. round here, they all say that the last train to run over that track was the "National Dream". And, in -R a way, they're right, although the "National Dream" was not a train , but the title of Pierre Berton's novel about the history of an idea that resulted in Canada's first transcontinental railway, known, for simplicity's sake, as the CPR. For ninety years, Canadian Pacific Railway has been in the minds of Canadians and others, and especially in 1974, when a television series, based onMr. Berton's two volumes on the construction of the CPR was- shown in eight installments on television in Canada. People around Penticton, British Columbia and the Carmi Subdivision of the Kootenay Division were and are particularly conscious - and proud, for it was a mere 50 miles away from their town that filming of some of the most spectacular country was done for the television series. Ex-Canadian Pacific steam locomotive Number 136, a 4-4-0, lea­ sed from Ontario Rail Association of Brampton, Ontario and fitted with a mushroom stack for the occasion, with a boxcar, baggage car and coach of early vintage, was brought all the way out west, via Crowsnest Pass, along CP RAIL's tracks in southern British Columbia. This was during the summer of 1973. THE MOST APPROPRIATE EXPLANATION OF THIS MONTH'S PECULIAR COVER LIES in the brief note which accompanied it: "This picture, which may in- terest you, was taken on June 30, 1974 at Crowsnest, B.C.
  • Progress on Edmonton's Valley Line

    Progress on Edmonton's Valley Line

    Progress on Edmonton’s Valley Line LRT – General Project Update Moderator Georg Josi, DIALOG Design Review Manager Owner’s Engineer – connectEd Transit Partnership Panel Chris Gentile City of Edmonton Technical Manager Valley Line Stage 1 B.Sc., M.Sc., University of Manitoba Panel Josh Jones AECOM Project Manager Valley Line Stage 1 Owner’s Engineer – connectEd Transit Partnership Panel Johanna Hoyt EllisDon Design Project Manager Valley Line Stage 1 TransEd Partners Panel Colin Hill EllisDon Deputy Project Director Valley Line Stage 1 TransEd Partners LRT Development in Edmonton 6 LRT Development in Edmonton 7 LRT Development in Edmonton Capital Line Clareview to University of Alberta 1978 - 1992 Capital Line – Extension University of Alberta to Century Park 2006 - 2010 Metro Line University of Alberta to NAIT 2015 Edmonton’s LRT Vision 9 Edmonton’s LRT Vision Edmonton’s Future LRT Network 11 Edmonton’s LRT Expansion Valley Line - Stage 1 Downtown to Mill Woods 2020 Valley Line - Stage 2 Downtown to Lewis Farms Beyond 2020 Metro Line NAIT to Blatchford Beyond 2020 Balance of LRT Network Multiple Line Expansions 2025 - 2040 Valley Line - Stage 1 Overall Plan Low floor, urban-style LRT line 13 km 11 At-grade Stops 1 Elevated Station Interchange at Churchill Station (Downtown) 1 Tunnel 2 LRT Bridges 2 Elevated Guideways 2 Pedestrian Bridges 1 O&M Facility Valley Line - Stage 1 14 Valley Line - Stage 1 Scope • 13 km Line running from Millwoods Town Centre Mall in the South East of Edmonton to 102 Ave and 102 Street in Downtown Edmonton •
  • Freight Railroads in South Dakota Rail Fast Facts for 2019 Freight Railroads …

    Freight Railroads in South Dakota Rail Fast Facts for 2019 Freight Railroads …

    Freight Railroads in South Dakota Rail Fast Facts For 2019 Freight railroads ….............................................................................................................................................................10 Freight railroad mileage …..........................................................................................................................................1,822 Freight rail employees …...............................................................................................................................................776 Average wages & benefits per employee …...................................................................................................$116,970 Railroad retirement beneficiaries …......................................................................................................................1,700 Railroad retirement benefits paid ….....................................................................................................................$46 million U.S. Economy: According to a Towson University study, in 2017, America's Class I railroads supported: Sustainability: Railroads are the most fuel efficient way to move freight over land. It would have taken approximately 6.3 million additional trucks to handle the 113.5 million tons of freight that moved by rail in South Dakota in 2019. Rail Traffic Originated in 2019 Total Tons: 14.1 million Total Carloads: 141,400 Commodity Tons (mil) Carloads Farm Products 7.4 72,000 Chemicals 3.5 36,200 Food Products 2.8
  • Federal Railroad Administration Fiscal Year 2012 Enforcement Report

    Federal Railroad Administration Fiscal Year 2012 Enforcement Report

    Federal Railroad Fiscal Year 2012 Administration Enforcement Report Table of Contents I. Introduction II. Summary of Inspections and Audits Performed and of Enforcement Actions Recommended in FY 2012 A. Railroad Safety and Hazmat Compliance Inspections and Audits 1. All Railroads and Other Entities (e.g., Hazmat Shippers) Except Individuals 2. Railroads Only B. Summary of Railroad Safety Violations Cited by Inspectors, by Regulatory Oversight Discipline or Subdiscipline 1. Accident/Incident Reporting 2. Grade Crossing Signal System Safety 3. Hazardous Materials 4. Motive Power and Equipment 5. Railroad Operating Practices 6. Signal System Safety 7. Track C. FRA and State Inspections of Railroads, Sorted by Railroad Type 1. Class I Railroads 2. Probable Class II Railroads 3. Probable Class III Railroads D. Inspections and Recommended Enforcement Actions, Sorted by Individual Class I Railroad 1. BNSF Railway Company 2. Canadian National Railway/Grand Trunk Corporation 3. Canadian Pacific Railway/Soo Line Railroad Company 4. CSX Transportation, Inc. 5. The Kansas City Southern Railway Company 6. National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak) 7. Norfolk Southern Railway Company 8. Union Pacific Railroad Company III. Civil Penalty Assessment and Settlement Summaries in FY 2012 A. In General B. Summary 1—Brief Summary, with Focus on Initial Assessments Transmitted C. Breakdown of Initial Assessments in Summary 1 1. For Each Class I Railroad Individually in FY 2012 2. For Probable Class II Railroads in Aggregate in FY 2012 3. For Probable Class III Railroads in Aggregate in FY 2012 4. For Hazmat Shippers in Aggregate in FY 2012 5. For Contractors in Aggregate in FY 2012 D.
  • Intrarailroad and Intermodal Competition Impacts on Railroad Wheat Rates by Michael W

    Intrarailroad and Intermodal Competition Impacts on Railroad Wheat Rates by Michael W

    JTRF Volume 54 No. 3, Fall 2015 Intrarailroad and Intermodal Competition Impacts on Railroad Wheat Rates by Michael W. Babcock and Bebonchu Atems The issue addressed in this paper is more fully understanding the relationship of intrarailroad competition and rail rates for wheat in the largest wheat producing states, which are Idaho, Kansas, Minnesota, Montana, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Texas, and Washington. The overall objective of the study is to investigate railroad pricing behavior for wheat shipments. The rate model was estimated with OLS in double-log specification utilizing the 2012 STB Confidential Waybill sample and other data. The research found that the distance from origin to destination and the total shipment weight had the expected negative relationships with railroad wheat rates and were statistically significant. The distance from origin to the nearest barge loading location had the expected positive relationship to railroad wheat rates and was also significant. The weight of each covered hopper car and the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index were both non-significant. However, the study used other data to determine that intrarailroad competition for wheat shipments within states appears to be present in most states. INTRODUCTION Railroads were the most heavily regulated transportation mode prior to passage of the Staggers Rail Act in 1980. Deregulation gave the railroads price flexibility that was previously unavailable. Prices between variable cost and 180% of variable cost were not subject to regulatory review. The Staggers Act set time limits for ICC decisions regarding abandonments and mergers. Thus, Class I railroads were able to quickly abandon or sell unprofitable branch lines.
  • South Dakota's Railroads

    South Dakota's Railroads

    South Dakota’s Railroads South Dakota State Historic Preservation Office South Dakota’s Railroads: An Historic Context Prepared for: South Dakota State Historic Preservation Office 900 Governors Drive Pierre, South Dakota 57501 Prepared by: Mark Hufstetler and Michael Bedeau Renewable Technologies, Inc. 511 Metals Bank Bldg. Butte, Montana 59701 July 1998 Revised, December 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction.................................................................................................................................2 A. Purpose of this Document..............................................................................................2 B. Methodology ..................................................................................................................3 2. The Importance of Railroads to South Dakota ...........................................................................4 3. The History of Railroading in South Dakota..............................................................................5 A. Geographical Background .............................................................................................5 B. Establishment and Expansion: South Dakota Railroads in the Nineteenth Century......6 1. Beginnings (1851-1868) .....................................................................................6 2. The Little Dakota Boom and the First Railroads (1868-1873)...........................8 3. Railway Expansion During the Great Dakota Boom (1878-1887).....................9 4. The Impact and
  • DAKOTA, MINNESOTA ) Finance Docket No

    DAKOTA, MINNESOTA ) Finance Docket No

    BEFORE THE SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD ) CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY, ) ET AL. – CONTROL – DAKOTA, MINNESOTA ) Finance Docket No. 35081 & EASTERN RAILROAD CORP., ET AL. ) ) PETITION OF THE STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA ACTING BY AND THROUH ITS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TO ENFORCE CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY’S INVESTMENT REPRESENTATIONS By: Karla L. Engle Special Assistant Attorney General South Dakota Department of Transportation 700 E. Broadway Ave. Pierre, SD 57501-2586 (605) 773-3262 John H. LeSeur Slover & Loftus LLP 1224 Seventeenth Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20036 (202) 347-7170 Dated: August 8, 2013 Attorneys for Petitioner 0 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page PREFACE AND SUMMARY ............................................................................................ 1 I. BACKGROUND ...................................................................................................... 6 A. DM&E Is Created to Provide Vital Rail Service in South Dakota (1986) ................................................................................. 6 B. DM&E Grows by Acquiring the Colony Line and IC&E; Obtains Rights to Build into the PRB (1996-2006) ...................................... 7 C. CP Proposes to Acquire DME; Says Its Interest Is Not Tied to DME’s PRB Rights (2007-2008) ...................................................... 9 D. CP Represents That Shippers Will Benefit from Its Acquisition of DME Because CP Offers Expanded Single-System Service and Agrees to Undertake Substantial Capital Investments in DME (2007-2008) ..................................................................................