Policy Recommendations to Uplift Industrial Production Capacity in the New EU Member States
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Policy recommendations to uplift industrial production capacity in the new EU Member States Smart Factories in new EU Member States Final Report FINAL REPORT A study prepared for the European Commission DG Communications Networks, Content & Technology by: Digital Single Market This study was carried out for the European Commission by PwC EU Services EEIG Internal identification Contract Number: 30-CE-0850717/00-35 SMART Number: 2016-1005 DISCLAIMER By the European Commission, Directorate-General of Communications Networks, Content & Technology. The information and views set out in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the Commission. The Commission does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this study. Neither the Commission nor any person acting on the Commission’s behalf may be held responsible for the use which may be made of the information contained therein. ISBN 978-92-76-04085-9 doi: 10.2759/960842 Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2019 © European Union, 2019. All rights reserved. Certain parts are licensed under conditions to the EU. Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. The reuse policy of European Commission documents is regulated by Decision 2011/833/EU (OJ L 330, 14.12.2011, p. 39). For any use or reproduction of photos or other material that is not under the EU copyright, permission must be sought directly from the copyright holders. Smart Factories in new EU Member States Final Report Table of contents Executive Summary............................................................................................ 4 Résumé Opérationnel ......................................................................................... 9 1 Introduction .................................................................................................... 13 1.1 Setting the scene ..................................................................................... 13 1.2 Overview of the approach .......................................................................... 17 2 Analysis of industrial production capacity in the selected regions ............................ 19 2.1 State of play ............................................................................................ 19 2.2 State of play of each region ....................................................................... 20 2.2.1 Bulgaria .................................................................................................. 20 2.2.2 Croatia ................................................................................................... 32 2.2.3 Cyprus ................................................................................................... 42 2.2.4 Czech Republic ........................................................................................ 48 2.2.5 Estonia ................................................................................................... 59 2.2.6 Hungary ................................................................................................. 62 2.2.7 Latvia ..................................................................................................... 82 2.2.8 Lithuania ................................................................................................ 89 2.2.9 Malta ...................................................................................................... 94 2.2.10 Poland ................................................................................................ 103 2.2.11 Romania ............................................................................................. 132 2.2.12 Slovakia .............................................................................................. 160 2.2.13 Slovenia .............................................................................................. 178 3 Supporting policy measures for the establishment of DIHs in the EU13 ................. 184 3.1 Identification of successful support measures in the EU15 ........................... 185 3.2 Best practice of support measures in the EU15........................................... 190 3.2.1 Skills Bridge (Luxembourg) – Skilling measure .......................................... 191 3.2.2 CAP’TRONIC (France) – Digital enabler ..................................................... 194 3.2.3 Voucher for digitisation in SMEs (Italy) – Voucher system ........................... 196 3.2.4 Made different | Digital Wallonia (Wallonia, Belgium) – Digital enabler ......... 197 3.2.5 Digitisation and Innovation vouchers (NRW, Germany) – Voucher system ..... 200 3.2.6 Competence, Innovation and Flexicurity (Comiflex) (West Sweden) – Skilling measures .............................................................................................. 202 4 Challenges and lessons learned from the project ................................................ 205 4.1 Awareness of digitalisation benefits among SMEs ....................................... 206 4.2 Access to funding ................................................................................... 208 4.3 Policy support and cooperation with national and regional authorities ........... 211 4.4 Human Capital ....................................................................................... 212 4.5 Unique value proposition ......................................................................... 214 5 Recommendations for improving the industrial sector competitiveness in EU13 ...... 216 5.1 Policy recommendations on the EU level .................................................... 216 5.1.1 Lessons learned from the implementation of current European initiatives ...... 216 5.1.2 Possible implementation options of best practices ...................................... 218 5.2 Policy recommendations on national level ........................................... 220 5.3 Policy recommendations on regional level ........................................... 221 PwC 3 Smart Factories in new EU Member States Final Report Executive Summary For the period 2021-2027 the European Commission foresees to invest €9.2 billion in the first ever Digital Europe programme for increasing the EU's international competitiveness through investing in the digital capacity of the European economy. For this new investment programme to succeed, a solid network of European Digital Innovation Hubs will be set up. In each European region there will be at least one European Digital Innovation Hub. The network will be built upon a wide variety of programmes to stimulate the creation and capacity building of Digital Innovation Hubs (DIHs), in particular with the assistance of the European Regional Development Funds and the Horizon 2020 programme. Coordination and Support Actions (e.g. I4MS, Smart Anything Everywhere, etc.), Interreg projects (KETGATE, S34Growth), initiatives under macro-regional strategies and the S3 thematic partnerships are experimenting with Digital Innovation Hubs’ collaborations across Europe. This project focused on the creation of Digital Innovation Hubs’ capacity in the new EU Member States. The rationale for the project was to address the disproportion in the number of DIHs and maturity levels represented by DIHs between the EU13 and the EU15. The nature of the actions undertaken were twofold: 1. a training and mentoring programme focused only on DIHs from the EU13 2. an in-depth study of policy support measures for creating and supporting DIHs in the EU15 and a comparison with best practice in policy support measures in the EU13. To enable the identification, assessment and recommendation to DIHs, a specific methodology was developed for Digital Innovation Hubs. This logical model helps in understanding basic elements involved in the functioning of DIHs and in their potential interactions. This model is based on inputs, activities, outputs and outcomes. The training and mentoring programme constituted the major part of the project. It combined different elements and methods to enhance DIHs’ experience and maximise the impact of the programme curriculum. The training resources were grouped into eight knowledge areas, each relating to a package of in-country training and mentoring, and aligned to the specific requirements of a section of the final business plan to be developed by each DIH. The trainings were delivered using digital channels and webinars and were followed up with live question and answer sessions. Another key element of the programme was the support offered by dedicated mentors. The primary role of the mentor was to deliver 1:1 training, discussing elements of the training packages that their individual learner required support in, and helping the hub in the completion of the set exercises and templates. The mentors were responsible for ensuring each DIH had the necessary grounding in the training topics taught, to be able to complete the exercises. The programme also offered a peer-learning component, which promoted the exchange and sharing of knowledge, experience and practices among the selected DIHs. It was particularly important for DIHs in the early stage of development to learn from DIHs, which have already gained significant results. Several online best practice exchange sessions and face-to-face networking meetings were organised, which exposed DIHs to key stakeholders of the innovation ecosystem. PwC 4 Smart Factories in new EU Member States Final Report In addition, an analysis of the state-of-play