DOCSLIB.ORG

A Framework for Understanding Physical Ecosystem Engineering by Organisms

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Framework for Understanding Physical Ecosystem Engineering by Organisms Oikos 119: 1862–1869, 2010 doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2010.18782.x © 2010 Th e Authors. Oikos © 2010 Nordic Society Oikos Subject Editor: Jonathan W. Moore. Accepted 30 August 2010 A framework for understanding physical ecosystem engineering by organisms Clive G. Jones , Jorge L. Guti é rrez , James E. Byers , Jeffrey A. Crooks, John G. Lambrinos and Theresa S. Talley C. G. Jones ([email protected]), Cary Inst. of Ecosystem Studies, PO Box AB, Millbrook, NY 12545, USA; and Direction Scientifi que, AgroParisTech, 19 avenue du Maine, FR – 75732 Paris, France. – J. L. Guti é rrez, Grupo de Investigaci ó n y Educaci ó n en Temas Ambientales (GrIETA), Espa ñ a 3364, Mar del Plata (7600), Argentina; and Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Depto de Biolog í a, Univ. Nacional de Mar del Plata, Funes 3250, 2 ° Piso, Mar del Plata (7600), Argentina. – J. E. Byers, Odum School of Ecology, Univ. of Georgia, 140 E. Green St., Athens, GA 30602, USA. – J. A. Crooks, Tijuana River National Estuarine Research Reserve, 301 Caspian Way, Imperial Beach, CA 91932, USA. – J. G. Lambrinos, Dept of Horticulture, Oregon State Univ., 4017 Agriculture and Life Sciences Building, Corvallis, OR 97331-73044, USA. – T. S. Talley, Integrative Oceanography Division, Scripps Inst. of Oceanography, Univ. of California, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA . While well-recognized as an important kind of ecological interaction, physical ecosystem engineering by organisms is diverse with varied consequences, presenting challenges for developing and using general understanding. Th ere is also still some uncertainty as to what it is, and some skepticism that the diversity of engineering and its eff ects is amenable to conceptual integration and general understanding. What then, are the key cause/eff ect relationships and what underlies them? Here we develop, enrich and extend our extant understanding of physical ecosystem engineering into an integrated framework that exposes the essential cause/eff ect relationships, their underpinnings, and the interconnections that need to be understood to explain or predict engineering eff ects. Th e framework has four cause/eff ect relationships linking four components: 1. An engineer causes structural change; 2. Structural change causes abiotic change; 3. Structural and abiotic change cause biotic change; 4. Structural, abiotic and biotic change can feedback to the engineer. Th e fi rst two relationships describe an ecosys- tem engineering process and abiotic dynamics, while the second two describe biotic consequence for other species and the engineer. Th e four relationships can be parameterized and linked using time-indexed equations that describe engineered system dynamics. After describing the relationships we discuss the utility of the framework; how it might be enriched; and briefl y how it can be used to identify intersections of ecosystem engineering with fi elds outside ecology. Ecosystem engineering by organisms (Jones et al. 1994, (Jones et al. 1994, Berkenbusch and Rowden 2003, Wright 1997a) is now well-recognized as an important general kind and Jones 2006). Our objectives are to amplify and clarify of ecological interaction of basic and applied relevance (Crooks what physical engineering is, and show that the diversity of 2002, Rosemond and Anderson 2003, Boogert et al. 2006, cause and eff ects is amenable to general understanding. We Byers et al. 2006, Wright and Jones 2006, Cuddington et al. thereby hope to facilitate theory development and model- 2007). Yet ecosystem engineering is diverse with varied conse- ing, hypothesis formulation, comparison and generalization, quences, presenting challenges for developing general under- empirical study and methodological development in this standing from case studies that can then be applied to other rapidly growing fi eld of research. We also hope that by for- studies. Th ere is also still some uncertainty as to what enginee- mally exposing the relationships and their underpinnings, the ring is and is not; some skepticism that the diversity of engi- framework will help other fi elds such as geomorphology, envi- neering and its eff ects is amenable to conceptual integration ronmental engineering, and evolutionary biology, identify their and general understanding; and continued debate over the points of intersections with ecosystem engineering. value of the mechanistic approach that underlies the con- cept (Reichman and Seabloom 2002a, 2002b, Wilby 2002, Wright and Jones 2006, Cuddington 2007, Wilson 2007, Framework: engineering cause and Jones and Guti é rrez 2007). effect relationships Here we develop, enrich and extend our extant understand- ing of physical ecosystem engineering into an integrated frame- Four general cause and eff ect relationships link four compo- work that exposes the essential cause/eff ect relationships, their nents (Fig. 1): 1. An engineer causes structural change; 2. Struc- underpinnings, and the interconnections that need to be tural change causes abiotic change; 3. Structural and abiotic understood to explain or predict engineering eff ects, and change cause biotic change; 4. Structural, abiotic, and biotic that can help make sense of, and generalize from, case studies change can feedback to the engineer. Th e fi rst two relationships 1862 Table 1. Parameters and time (t) -indexed equations (magnitudes, rates, frequencies) for engineered system dynamics. As illustrated through- out the text, the general notations make no assumptions about the shapes of relationships; include the potential for fi rst or higher order interaction terms; allow one or more independent variables to have zero values if not relevant (e.g. B ϭ 0 and S ϭ 0 in Eq. 7 when there is only an abiotic feedback to engineer density); allow for substituation across equations (e.g. P and ρ for K, when an engineer generates kinetic energy); and can be specifi ed for particular study systems (e.g. inclusion of parameters describing the shape of the relationship, system-specifi c covariates and additional variables). S: Structural state (physical properties) F: Structure formation by engineer (construction and maintenance) D: Structural decay P: Per capita engineering activity ρ : Engineer density R: Intrinsic durability of structural materials Figure 1. Physical ecosystem engineering by organisms. Th e cause/ I: Intensity of structurally destructive forces A: Abiotic state (relevant abiotic variables) eff ect relationships representing an engineered system. Th e solid K: Kinetic energy (other than K generated by P, ρ ) arrow for autogenic engineering represents the physical manifesta- M: Abiotic materials (fl uids, solids) tion of organismal structure inserted into the abiotic milieu. Th e striped B: Biotic state as biotic response variables of interest arrow for allogenic engineering represents the action of the engineer Structural change on other living or non-living structure. ϭ ϩ St ϩ 1 St Ft – Dt … … … … … … … … … … … … Eq. 1 Where: describe an ecosystem engineering process and abiotic dynam- ϭ ρ Ft f (Pt ’ t ) … … … … ... … … … ...… … … … … … Eq. 2 ics, while the second two describe biotic consequence for other ϭ Dt f (Rt’ It ) … … … … … ... … … ...… … … … … … Eq. 3 ϭ species and the engineer (Jones and Guti é rrez 2007). All four S0 Baseline unmodifi ed structural state relationships may need to be interconnected to understand Abiotic change ϭ engineered system dynamics. Most of the sections below con- At ϩ 1 f (At ’ St ’ Kt ’ Mt ) … … … … ...… … … … … ... Eq. 4 ϭ tain an overview followed by more detailed explanations. A0 Baseline unmodifi ed abiotic state Biotic change ϭ Bt ϩ 1 f (Bt ’ St ’ At ) . … … … … … … … .… … … … … Eq. 5 Engineer causes structural change ϭ B0 Baseline unmodifi ed biotic state An engineer species autogenically and/or allogenically (Jones Engineering feedbacks P ϩ ϭ f (P S A B ) … … … … ... … …… … … … .. Eq. 6 et al. 1994) causes structure formation in the abiotic envi- t 1 t’ t’ t’ t ρ ϩ ϭ f ( ρ S A B ) … … … … … … … … … … … .. Eq. 7 ronment, creating a new structural state relative to a baseline, t 1 t’ t’ t’ t unmodifi ed state. Th e degree of structure formation via con- struction and maintenance is a function of per capita engineer- Many sessile organisms are obvious autogenic engineers (e.g. ing activity (hereafter activity) and engineer density (Jones trees). However, engineers can be mobile and autogenic (e.g. et al. 1994; Table 1, Eq. 2). For example, coral reefs grow; a shells of living crabs create epibiont habitat), sessile and allo- pair of beaver builds a dam. Unless maintained, engineered genic (e.g. plant root growth creates soil macropores), and structures, like all physical structures, undergo structural decay simultan eously auto- and allogenic (e.g. many plants, micro- toward a baseline structural state. Th eir persistence in the bial soil surface crusts). absence of maintenance is a function of the intrinsic durabil- Assigning an organism to one, the other, or both categories ity of the structural materials and the intensity of structurally is less important than what structural origins can reveal about destructive forces (Jones et al. 1997a; Table 1, Eq.3). Engineer constraints on construction and maintenance and the onset death (for autogenic) and structure abandonment (for allo- of structural legacies. Autogenically engineered structures will genic) therefore leave decaying structural legacies (Hastings form if the organism can grow in that environment. Con- et al. 2007). Structural change over time is thus the sum of struction and maintenance are
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Zoogeomorphology & Ecosystem Engineering
    Zoogeomorphology & Ecosystem Engineering The 42nd Annual Binghamton Geomorphology Symposium October 21 – 23, 2011 University of South Alabama, Mobile, Alabama National Science University of Texas State University- Foundation South Alabama San Marcos Zoogeomorphology and Ecosystem Engineering The 42nd Annual Binghamton Geomorphology Symposium University of South Alabama, Mobile, Alabama October 21 – 23, 2011 Conference Organizers: David R. Butler Department of Geography, Texas State University-San Marcos Carol F. Sawyer Department of Earth Sciences, University of South Alabama Conference Sponsors National Science Foundation, GEO/EAR, Geomorphology & Land-Use Dynamics Department of Earth Sciences, University of South Alabama College of Arts and Sciences, University of South Alabama Department of Geography, Texas State University-San Marcos Field Trip Assistance Dr. Mimi Fearn, Ms. Sherall Cornwell, Ms. Karen Jordan, Ms. Tela O’Rourke, and Mr. Donald Brinkman, Department of Earth Sciences, University of South Alabama We wish to thank the following people for their assistance in organizing this symposium: Catherine Drake and the Center for Continuing Education & Conference Services staff, Univ. South Alabama Department of Earth Sciences faculty, staff, and students, including Dr. Mimi Fearn, Dr. Jim Connors, Sherall Cornwell, Chris Reese, Donald Brinkman, Tela O’Rourke, and Reva Stienstraw-Hitchcock Dr. Phil Suckling, Chair, Department of Geography, Texas State University-San Marcos Dr. Jack Vitek, Texas A&M University Dr. Richard Marston,
    [Show full text]
  • Biomechanical and Biochemical Effects Recorded in the Tree Root Zone – Soil Memory, Historical Contingency and Soil Evolution Under Trees
    Plant Soil (2018) 426:109–134 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-018-3622-9 REGULAR ARTICLE Biomechanical and biochemical effects recorded in the tree root zone – soil memory, historical contingency and soil evolution under trees Łukasz Pawlik & Pavel Šamonil Received: 17 September 2017 /Accepted: 1 March 2018 /Published online: 15 March 2018 # The Author(s) 2018 Abstract increase in soil spatial complexity. We hypothesized that Background and aims The changing soils is a never- trees can be a strong local factor intensifying, blocking ending process moderated by numerous biotic and abi- or modifying pedogenetic processes, leading to local otic factors. Among these factors, trees may play a changes in soil complexity (convergence, divergence, critical role in forested landscapes by having a large or polygenesis). These changes are hypothetically con- imprint on soil texture and chemical properties. During trolled by regionally predominating soil formation their evolution, soils can follow convergent or divergent processes. development pathways, leading to a decrease or an Methods To test the main hypothesis, we described the pedomorphological features of soils under tree stumps of fir, beech and hemlock in three soil regions: Haplic Highlights Cambisols (Turbacz Reserve, Poland), Entic Podzols 1) The architecture of tree root systems controls soil physical and (Žofínský Prales Reserve, Czech Republic) and Albic chemical properties. Podzols (Upper Peninsula, Michigan, USA). Soil pro- 2) The predominating pedogenetic process significantly modifies files under the stumps, as well as control profiles on sites the effect of trees on soil. 3) Trees are a factor in polygenesis in Haplic Cambisols at the currently not occupied by trees, were analyzed in the pedon scale.
    [Show full text]
  • Riparian Vegetation and the Fluvial Environment: a Biogeographic Perspective
    Provided for non-commercial research and educational use only. Not for reproduction, distribution or commercial use. This chapter was originally published in the Treatise on Geomorphology, the copy attached is provided by Elsevier for the author’s benefit and for the benefit of the author’s institution, for non-commercial research and educational use. This includes without limitation use in instruction at your institution, distribution to specific colleagues, and providing a copy to your institution’s administrator. All other uses, reproduction and distribution, including without limitation commercial reprints, selling or licensing copies or access, or posting on open internet sites, your personal or institution’s website or repository, are prohibited. For exceptions, permission may be sought for such use through Elsevier’s permissions site at: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/permissionusematerial Bendix J., and Stella J.C. Riparian Vegetation and the Fluvial Environment: A Biogeographic Perspective. In: John F. Shroder (Editor-in-chief), Butler, D.R., and Hupp, C.R. (Volume Editors). Treatise on Geomorphology, Vol 12, Ecogeomorphology, San Diego: Academic Press; 2013. p. 53-74. © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. 12.5 Riparian Vegetation and the Fluvial Environment: A Biogeographic Perspective J Bendix, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, USA JC Stella, State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry, Syracuse, NY, USA r 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. 12.5.1 Introduction 53 12.5.2 Early History:
    [Show full text]
  • BIOGEOMORPHOLOGY of COASTAL STRUCTURES: Understanding Interactions Between Hard Substrata and Colonising Organisms As a Tool for Ecological Enhancement
    BIOGEOMORPHOLOGY OF COASTAL STRUCTURES: Understanding interactions between hard substrata and colonising organisms as a tool for ecological enhancement Submitted by Martin Andrew Coombes B.Sc. M.Sc. , to the University of Exeter as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Geography In February 2011 This thesis is available for Library use on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. I certify that all material in this thesis which is not my own work has been identified and that no material has previously been submitted and approved for the award of a degree by this or any other University. Signature: M. A. Coombes --- BLANK --- 2 ABSTRACT Urbanisation is increasingly recognised as a major ecological pressure at the coast. By 2035, the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs will have to spend £1 billion each year on flood defence and erosion control infrastructure if current levels of protection are to be sustained in England and Wales; this represents a substantial commitment to building new hard structures. Ecological research has shown that structures like seawalls, breakwaters, and harbour and port infrastructure are poor surrogates for undisturbed rocky shores. This, alongside substantial international policy drivers, has led to an interest in the ways in which structures might be enhanced for ecological gain. Virtually all of this research has been undertaken by ecologists, while the contribution of geomorphological understanding has not been fully recognised. This thesis presents an assessment of the two-way interactions between colonising organisms and the materials used to build hard coastal structures under a framework of biogeomorphology.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Effects on Dune and Salt Marsh Biogeomorphology – a Trait-Based Approach
    Biodiversity effects on dune and salt marsh biogeomorphology – a trait-based approach Von der Fakultät für Mathematik und Naturwissenschaften der Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg zur Erlangung des Grades und Titels eines Doktors der Naturwissenschaften (Dr. rer. nat.) angenommene Dissertation von von Julia Bass geboren am 03. Februar 1989 in Bremen Oldenburg 2019 Gutachter Prof. Dr. Michael Kleyer Zweitgutachter Prof. Dr. Gerhard Zotz Tag der Disputation 13.11.2019 Contents Summary .........................................................................................................................1 Zusammenfassung ..........................................................................................................4 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................8 1.1 The concept of biogeomorphology ..................................................................8 1.2 The trait-based perspective in ecology ..........................................................13 1.3 Combining the biogeomorphic succession model and the functional trait approach .........................................................................................................18 1.4 Barrier islands and Halligen in the Wadden Sea ...........................................25 1.5 Research objectives .......................................................................................35 2 Morphological plasticity of dune pioneer plants in response to timing and magnitude
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamic Interactions Between Biodiversity and Geomorphology from Hurgada to Quseir - Red Sea Coast Using RS and GIS
    Geophysical Research Abstracts Vol. 21, EGU2019-940-1, 2019 EGU General Assembly 2019 © Author(s) 2018. CC Attribution 4.0 license. Dynamic interactions between biodiversity and Geomorphology from Hurgada to Quseir - Red Sea Coast Using RS and GIS Enas Farghaly (1), Seham Hashem (2), Samia Moheb (3), and Ahmed Khalafallah (4) (1) Geography Department ,Faculty of Women for Art, Science and Education - Ain Shams University,cairo, Egypt ([email protected]), (2) Geography Department ,Faculty of Women for Art, Science and Education - Ain Shams University, cairo, Egypt([email protected]), (3) Botany Department ,Faculty of Women for Art, Science and Education - Ain Shams University, cairo, Egypt ([email protected]), (4) Botany Department ,Faculty of Women for Art, Science and Education - Ain Shams University, cairo, Egypt ([email protected]) Study area extends from Hurghada to Quseir, between latitude 33 ◦20’ 00 "and33 ◦" 50 east, between the widths 26 ◦00’ 00 "and 27 ◦ 30’ 00"north . It was covered by the eastern desert and overlooking Red Sea coast. Subject importance is a study of geomorphological diversity units and different effects of biodiversity on erosion and mu- tual impacts of the biological environment and geomorphology in addition to touristic human activities and their impact on the biological and geomorphological environment. The study deals with Biogeomorphology of Red Sea Coast between Hurgada and Quseir Using RS and GIS,and study of interactions and feedbacks between living and nonliving parts of the landscape. Straddling the disci- plines of geomorphology and ecology, biogeomorphology is inherently interdisciplinary. Microorganisms, plants, and animals contribute to the development of landforms and landscapes in many different ways, both actively and passively, through processes of bioconstruction, bioweathering, bioerosion, and bioprotection.
    [Show full text]
  • Biogeomorphology of an Upper Chesapeake Bay River-Mouth Tidal Freshwater Marsh
    WETlANDS. Vol. 20. No.3. September 2000. pp. 520-537 C 2000. The Society of Wetland Scientists BIOGEOMORPHOLOGY OF AN UPPER CHESAPEAKE BAY RIVER-MOUTH TIDAL FRESHWATER MARSH Gregory B. Pasternackl, William B. Hilgartner2, and Grace S. Brush2 I Department of l..and. Air. and Water Resources University of California Davis. California, USA 95616-8628 E-mail: [email protected] 2 Department of Geography and Environmental Engineering The Johns Hopkins University Baltimore. Maryland. USA 21218 Abstract: Field mapping and monitoring of vegetation. sedimentation patterns. substrate characteristics, and geomorphology in the Bush River tributary to upper Chesapeake Bay has been conducted since 1991 to ascertain the process-morphology dynamics in a tidal freshwater marsh. Nine plant associations from 5 distinct marsh habitats were identified by clustering species abundance measurements from 115 quadrats throughout an 84-hectare area. High spatial variability in physical habitat conditions such as summer-average sediment deposition. summer-average organic content, and surface-sediment grain size distributions were explainable using combinations of independent variables, including elevation, plant distributions, and dis­ tances to the tidal inlet and an adjacent stream. Sedimentation and vegetation were both observed to show a predictable response to disturbance by animal activity. Key Words: tidal freshwater wetlands; plant species distributions. geomorphology, hydrology. sedimenta­ tion, Chesapeake Bay INTRODUCTION Parker and Leck 1985, Leck and Simpson 1987, Leek and Simpson 1994). Tidal freshwater marshes exist where watershed-de­ In contrast to plant community structure, little is rived sediment accumulates at the upstream boundary known about processes contributing to formation and of an estuary (Orson et ale 1992, Pasternack and Brush evolution of tidal freshwater marshes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Biogeomorphological Life Cycle of Poplars During the Fluvial Biogeomorphological Succession: a Special Focus on Populus Nigra L
    Open Archive TOULOUSE Archive Ouverte ( OATAO ) OATAO is an open access repository that collects the work of Toulouse researchers and makes it freely available over the web where possible. This is an author-deposited version published in : http://oatao.univ- toulouse.fr/ Eprints ID : 11091 To link to this article : doi:10.1002/esp.3515 URL : http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/esp.3515 To cite this version : Corenblit, Dov and Steiger, Johannes and González, Eduardo and Gurnell, Angela M. and Charrier, Gaspard and Darrozes, José and Dousseau, Julien and Julien, Frédéric and Lambs, Luc and Larrue, Sébastien and Roussel, Erwan and Vautier, Franck and Voldoire, Olivier The biogeomorphological life cycle of poplars during the fluvial biogeomorphological succession: a special focus on Populus nigra L. (2014) Earth Surface Processes and Landforms . ISSN 0197- 9337 Any correspondance concerning this service should be sent to the repository administrator: [email protected] DOI: 10.1002/esp.3515 The biogeomorphological life cycle of poplars during the fluvial biogeomorphological succession: a special focus on Populus nigra L. D. Corenblit, 1,2 * J. Steiger, 1,2 E. González, 3 A. M. Gurnell, 4 G. Charrier, 1,2 J. Darrozes, 5 J. Dousseau, 1,2 F. Julien, 6 L. Lambs, 6 S. Larrue, 1,2 E. Roussel, 7 F. Vautier 7 and O. Voldoire 1,2 1 Clermont Université, Maison des Sciences de l ’Homme, 4 rue Ledru, 63057, Clermont-Ferrand Cedex 1, France 2 CNRS, UMR 6042, GEOLAB – Laboratoire de géographie physique et environnementale, 63057, Clermont-Ferrand,
    [Show full text]
  • Geomorphic Controls on Biological Soil Crust Distribution: a Conceptual Model from the Mojave Desert (USA)
    Geomorphology 195 (2013) 99–109 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Geomorphology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/geomorph Geomorphic controls on biological soil crust distribution: A conceptual model from the Mojave Desert (USA) Amanda J. Williams a,b,⁎, Brenda J. Buck a, Deborah A. Soukup a, Douglas J. Merkler c a Department of Geoscience, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, 4505 S. Maryland Parkway, Las Vegas, NV 89154-4010, USA b School of Life Sciences, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, 4505 S. Maryland Parkway, Las Vegas, NV, 89154-4004, USA c USDA-NRCS, 5820 South Pecos Rd., Bldg. A, Suite 400, Las Vegas, NV 89120, USA article info abstract Article history: Biological soil crusts (BSCs) are bio-sedimentary features that play critical geomorphic and ecological roles in Received 30 November 2012 arid environments. Extensive mapping, surface characterization, GIS overlays, and statistical analyses ex- Received in revised form 17 April 2013 plored relationships among BSCs, geomorphology, and soil characteristics in a portion of the Mojave Desert Accepted 18 April 2013 (USA). These results were used to develop a conceptual model that explains the spatial distribution of Available online 1 May 2013 BSCs. In this model, geologic and geomorphic processes control the ratio of fine sand to rocks, which con- strains the development of three surface cover types and biogeomorphic feedbacks across intermontane Keywords: fi Biological soil crust basins. (1) Cyanobacteria crusts grow where abundant ne sand and negligible rocks form saltating sand Soil-geomorphology sheets. Cyanobacteria facilitate moderate sand sheet activity that reduces growth potential of mosses and Pedogenesis lichens. (2) Extensive tall moss–lichen pinnacled crusts are favored on early to late Holocene surfaces com- Vesicular (Av) horizon posed of mixed rock and fine sand.
    [Show full text]
  • High Temperature So2 Chemisorption on Model Systems
    HIGH TEMPERATURE SO2 CHEMISORPTION ON MODEL SYSTEMS IMPLICATIONS FOR IN-PLUME PROCESSES PAUL MARTIN AYRIS SUBMITTED FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY ENVIRONMENT DEPARTMENT, UNIVERSITY OF YORK SUBMITTED MAY, 2010 For my family. And for the wizard. Because of the wonderful things he does. ABSTRACT ABSTRACT Volcanic volatile species are scavenged by silicate ash during transition through eruption plumes. Scavenging may form S, F and Cl salts and acids on ash surfaces, though the mechanisms and controlling variables remain poorly understood. A limited mechanistic understanding impedes estimation of volcanic volatile budgets and may also prevent assessment of environmental impacts resulting from volatile scavenging. Limited assessment of these impacts may have implications for local communities affected by ashfall onto vegetation, soils and into water bodies, and ashfall from very large eruptions may have global impacts. Through experimental techniques, this study examined SO2 scavenging mechanisms on silicate ash surfaces. SO2 uptake experiments were conducted on model Ca-aluminosilicate xerogels and on glasses with chemical compositions of common ash types. The materials were characterised using bulk and surface-sensitive techniques to gain insight into the mechanisms of scavenging and the reaction products formed. SO2 chemisorption onto glass surfaces may occur on non- bridging oxygens of network modifying cations (Ca), forming sulphate salts (CaSO4) and initiates diffusion mechanisms which resupplies the surface with Ca. The chemisorption-diffusion mechanism may be most efficient at high temperature, and may become significant after a few minutes of SO2 exposure. The proposed scavenging mechanism may occur during the eruption within the high temperature volcanic conduit and in the core of the plume.
    [Show full text]
  • Vegetation and Geomorphic Connectivity in Mountain Fluvial Systems
    water Review Vegetation and Geomorphic Connectivity in Mountain Fluvial Systems Piotr Cienciala Department of Geography and GIS, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, 1301 W Green Street, Urbana, IL 61801, USA; [email protected] Abstract: Rivers are complex biophysical systems, constantly adjusting to a suite of changing gov- erning conditions, including vegetation cover within their basins. This review seeks to: (i) highlight the crucial role that vegetation’s influence on the efficiency of clastic material fluxes (geomorphic connectivity) plays in defining mountain fluvial landscape’s behavior; and (ii) identify key chal- lenges which hinder progress in the understanding of this subject. To this end, a selective literature review is carried out to illustrate the pervasiveness of the plants’ effects on geomorphic fluxes within channel networks (longitudinal connectivity), as well as between channels and the broader land- scape (lateral connectivity). Taken together, the reviewed evidence lends support to the thesis that vegetation-connectivity linkages play a central role in regulating geomorphic behavior of mountain fluvial systems. The manuscript is concluded by a brief discussion of the need for the integration of mechanistic research into the local feedbacks between plants and sediment fluxes with basin-scale research that considers emergent phenomena. Keywords: fluvial system; geomorphic connectivity; riparian vegetation; biogeomorphology; moun- tain rivers Citation: Cienciala, P. Vegetation and Geomorphic Connectivity in 1. Introduction Mountain Fluvial Systems. Water Rivers are complex and dynamic systems, constantly adjusting to a suite of chang- 2021, 13, 593. https://doi.org/ ing governing conditions, which include the characteristics of the biophysical landscape 10.3390/w13050593 within which they are embedded.
    [Show full text]
  • Functional Consequences of Short and Long Term Vegetation
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Apollo 1 Considering river structure and stability in the light of evolution: feedbacks 2 between riparian vegetation and hydrogeomorphology 3 4 5 Dov Corenblit1,2*, Neil S. Davies3, Johannes Steiger1,2, Martin R. Gibling4 and Gudrun 6 Bornette5 7 8 1 Clermont Université, UBP, 4 rue Ledru, 63057 Clermont-Ferrand Cedex 1, France. 9 2 CNRS, UMR 6042, GEOLAB – Laboratoire de géographie physique et 10 environnementale, 63057 Clermont-Ferrand, France. 11 3 Department of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge 12 CB2 3EQ, United Kingdom. 13 4.Department of Earth Sciences, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 4R2, 14 Canada. 15 5 CNRS, UMR 5023, LEHNA – Laboratoire d'Ecologie des Hydrosystèmes Naturels et 16 Anthropisés, Université Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, F-69622, Lyon, France. 17 18 Corresponding author*: [email protected] 19 Ph. +33 (0)4 73 34 68 43 20 Fx. +33 (0)4 73 34 68 24 21 22 1 23 Abstract 24 25 River ecological functioning can be conceptualized according to a four-dimensional 26 framework, based on the responses of aquatic and riparian communities to 27 hydrogeomorphic constraints along the longitudinal, transverse, vertical and temporal 28 dimensions of rivers. Contemporary riparian vegetation responds to river dynamics at 29 ecological timescales, but riparian vegetation, in one form or another, has existed on 30 Earth since at least the Middle Ordovician (c. 450 Ma) and has been a significant 31 controlling factor on river geomorphology since the late Silurian (c.
    [Show full text]