Company Ad Hoc Report
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
BT SE Report
Community m 1 . m 6 8 . 2 0 m £ 2 8 £ 1 Community£ Charities and fundraising 03 04 05 Community contribution - investment in society through funding and support in kind BT is committed to make a positive Our community activities are Our stakeholders have told us that people experiencing problems are Telephone Helplines difference in society. in five main categories: we should support the most needy able to talk to someone. BT is Association (THA) • Charities and fundraising. We in society. committed to raise millions to help The Telephone Helplines Association We do this by acting responsibly in support a range of initiatives with ChildLine move closer to its goal of (THA) represents organisations our everyday business conduct and a special focus on a campaign with The use of telephone helplines, answering every child’s call for help. providing telephone services including also by making specific investments the UK children’s charity, ChildLine. websites and national telethons ChildLine answers 2300 calls a day, advice, information, listening support in communities to improve the quality demonstrate how communications but hundreds more children can’t get and counselling on a vast range of of life and sense of well-being for • Education. We use a variety of technology can help in charity through. Within the last two years subjects. those who live there. Our focus is techniques and media, including fundraising. we have raised more than £3.1 million on better communications. live drama and web-based activities, across the UK - the largest sum we BT has supported the development to promote communication and Our guide, Bidding for Funds and have ever raised for a single charity. -
BT and Openreach Go Their Separate Ways
BT And Openreach Go Their Separate Ways BT And Openreach Go Their Separate Ways 1 / 2 Nov 29, 2016 — It is one of the most dragged-out divorces in corporate history but it seems that BT and Openreach will definitely go their separate ways. Jul 5, 2016 — We assumed that Three and O2 would keep competing as separate entities ... There is always a competitive tension for mobile network operators (MNOs) in ... We looked at a number of ways in which BT could have tried to harm EE's ... I do not intend to go into great detail on the substance of the case (the .... Another way, although I doubt it will work for liability reasons, would be to contact Facebook ... Is there any way of establishing contact directly with Openreach? ... Get help for all your BT products and services you use at home and on the go.. [12] Since 2005, BT have been accused of abusing their control of Openreach, ... It now required a licence in the same way as any other telecommunications operator. ... The next major development for British Telecommunications, and a move ... BT stated that PlusNet will continue to operate separately out of its Sheffield .... May 21, 2021 — Another way, although I doubt it will work for liability reasons, would be to ... I can't find any other way to contact Openreach on their website. ... Get help for all your BT products and services you use at home and on the go. After this encounter, Bo and Lauren go their separate ways. ... What settings should I use for a fibre router that's connected to a BT Openreach modem? Persons ... -
Promoting Competition and Investment in Fibre Networks: BT Regulatory Financial Reporting
Promoting competition and investment in fibre networks: BT Regulatory Financial Reporting Reporting requirements covering wholesale fixed telecoms markets 2021-26 CONSULTATION: Publication Date: 6 February 2020 Closing Date for Responses: 1 April 2020 2020 BT Regulatory Financial Reporting Consultation Contents Section 1. Overview 2 2. Introduction 4 3. Regulatory reporting remedies in the Wholesale Fixed Telecoms Market Review 10 4. Published performance schedules 15 5. Preparation and assurance requirements 51 6. Information provided to Ofcom 81 7. Proposed SMP condition, directions and legal tests 92 Annexes A1. Responding to this consultation 104 A2. Ofcom’s consultation principles 107 A3. Consultation coversheet 108 A4. Consultation questions 109 A5. Draft legal instruments 110 1 2020 BT Regulatory Financial Reporting Consultation 1. Overview 1.1 On 8 January 2020, we published the consultation for our Wholesale Fixed Telecoms Market Review (WFTMR)1. This document sets out our proposed regulatory financial reporting requirements on BT in these markets. BT’s regulatory reporting will be subject to these requirements from April 2021 for five years. 1.2 Because the WFTMR covers most wholesale fixed telecoms markets we regulate and will determine our regulatory approach for the next five years, we are taking the opportunity to conduct a more holistic review of BT’s reporting requirements. This will ensure they remain fit for purpose while making the published information more accessible and easier to understand. 1.3 Our proposals cover the preparation and presentation of information published by BT, and information provided privately to Ofcom. What we are proposing We are proposing to impose regulatory financial reporting requirements on BT which require the production of Regulatory Financial Statements (RFS). -
Transformation Solutions, Unlocking Value for Clients
CEO Study Telecom Implementations Chris Pearson Global Business Consulting Industry Leader 21.11.2008 1 IBM Telecom Industry Agenda . CEO Study – Enterprise of the Future . IBM’s view of the Telecom market . IP Economy . The Change agenda . World is becoming Smarter 2 Storm Warning | ZA Lozinski | Clouds v0.0 - September 2008 | IBM Confidential © 2008 IBM Corporation We spoke toIBM 1,130 Telecom CEOs Industry and conducted in-depth analyses to identify the characteristics of the Enterprise of the Future How are organizations addressing . New and changing customers – changes at the end of the value chain . Global integration – changes within the value chain . Business model innovation – their response to these changes Scope and Approach: 1,130 CEOs and Public Sector Leaders . One-hour interviews using a structured questionnaire . 78% Private and 22% Public Sector . Representative sample across 32 industries . 33% Asia, 36% EMEA, 31% Americas . 80% Established and 20% Emerging Economies Analysis: Quantitative and Qualitative . Respondents’ current behavior, investment patterns and future intent . Choices made by financial outperformers . Multivariate analysis to identify clusters of responses . Selective case studies of companies that excel in specific areas 3 Storm Warning | ZA Lozinski | Clouds v0.0 - September 2008 | IBM Confidential © 2008 IBM Corporation IBM Telecom Industry The Enterprise of the Future is . 1 2 3 4 5 Hungry Innovative Globally Disruptive Genuine, for beyond integrated by not just change customer nature generous imagination 4 Storm Warning | ZA Lozinski | Clouds v0.0 - September 2008 | IBM Confidential © 2008 IBM Corporation Telecom CEOsIBM Telecom anticipate Industry more change ahead; are adjusting business models; investing in innovation and new capabilities Telecom CEOs : Hungry . -
Order of the President (Amendment And
IN THE COMPETITION Case No.: 1278/5/7/17 APPEAL TRIBUNAL B E T W E E N: (1) BRITISH TELECOMMUNICATIONS PLC (2) EE LIMITED (3) PLUSNET PLC (4) DABS.COM LIMITED Claimants -v- (1) MASTERCARD INCORPORATED (2) MASTERCARD INTERNATIONAL INCORPORATED (3) MASTERCARD EUROPE SA Defendants _____________________________________________________________________ ORDER _____________________________________________________________________ HAVING REGARD TO the Tribunal’s Reasoned Order of 28 September 2017 AND UPON reading the Claimants’ application made on 18 October 2017 (the “Application”) under rules 31(2) and 32(1)(b) of the Competition Appeal Tribunal Rules 2015 (the “Tribunal Rules”) for permission: (i) to amend the Claim Form and Particulars of Claim; and (ii) to serve the claim outside the jurisdiction on the First and Second Defendants IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The Claimants be permitted to amend the Claim Form and Particulars of Claim in the form of the draft attached to the Application. 2. The Claimants be permitted to serve the Amended Claim Form and Particulars of Claim on First and Second Defendants outside the jurisdiction. 3. This order is without prejudice to the rights of the First and Second Defendants to apply pursuant to rule 34 of the Tribunal Rules to dispute the jurisdiction. REASONS 1. The claim and an application for service out of jurisdiction on the First and Second Defendants were filed at the Tribunal on 12 September 2017. Pursuant to that Application, I granted permission for service out for the reasons set out in my Order of 28 September 2017. After Directions for Service were sent to the Claimants, the Claimants’ solicitors became aware that on 15 September 2017 the Fourth Claimant, which at the time the claim was filed was a public company, had re-registered as a private limited company. -
Premises, Sites Etc Within 30 Miles of Harrington Museum Used for Military Purposes in the 20Th Century
Premises, Sites etc within 30 miles of Harrington Museum used for Military Purposes in the 20th Century The following listing attempts to identify those premises and sites that were used for military purposes during the 20th Century. The listing is very much a works in progress document so if you are aware of any other sites or premises within 30 miles of Harrington, Northamptonshire, then we would very much appreciate receiving details of them. Similarly if you spot any errors, or have further information on those premises/sites that are listed then we would be pleased to hear from you. Please use the reporting sheets at the end of this document and send or email to the Carpetbagger Aviation Museum, Sunnyvale Farm, Harrington, Northampton, NN6 9PF, [email protected] We hope that you find this document of interest. Village/ Town Name of Location / Address Distance to Period used Use Premises Museum Abthorpe SP 646 464 34.8 km World War 2 ANTI AIRCRAFT SEARCHLIGHT BATTERY Northamptonshire The site of a World War II searchlight battery. The site is known to have had a generator and Nissen huts. It was probably constructed between 1939 and 1945 but the site had been destroyed by the time of the Defence of Britain survey. Ailsworth Manor House Cambridgeshire World War 2 HOME GUARD STORE A Company of the 2nd (Peterborough) Battalion Northamptonshire Home Guard used two rooms and a cellar for a company store at the Manor House at Ailsworth Alconbury RAF Alconbury TL 211 767 44.3 km 1938 - 1995 AIRFIELD Huntingdonshire It was previously named 'RAF Abbots Ripton' from 1938 to 9 September 1942 while under RAF Bomber Command control. -
BT Group Regulatory Affairs, Response Remove All 4
Annex to the BT response to Ofcom’s consultation on promoting competition and investment in fibre networks – Wholesale Fixed Telecoms Market Review 2021-26 29 May 2020 Non - confidential version Branding: only keep logos if the response is on behalf of more than one brand, i.e. BT/Openreach joint response or BT/EE/Plusnet joint response. Comments should be addressed to: Remove the other brands, or if it is purely a BT BT Group Regulatory Affairs, response remove all 4. BT Centre, London, EC1A 7AJ [email protected] BT RESPONSE TO OFCOM’S CONSULTATION ON COMPETITION AND INVESTMENT IN FIBRE NETWORKS 2 Contents CONTENTS .................................................................................................................................................. 2 A1. COMPASS LEXECON: REVIEW OF OFCOM'S APPROACH TO ASSESSING ULTRAFAST MARKET POWER 3 A2. ALTNET ULTRAFAST DEPLOYMENTS AND INVESTMENT FUNDING ...................................................... 4 A3. EXAMPLES OF INCREASING PRICE PRESSURE IN BUSINESS TENDERING MARKETS .............................. 6 A4. MARKET ANALYSIS AND REMEDIES RELATED TO PHYSICAL INFRASTRUCTURE ................................... 7 Our assessment of Ofcom’s market analysis ............................................................................................ 8 Our assessment of Ofcom’s remedies .................................................................................................... 12 A5. RISKS BORNE BY INVESTORS IN BT’S FIBRE INVESTMENT ................................................................ -
5G Implementation in Non-EU Countries of Europe Region
5G IMPLEMENTATION IN NON-EU COUNTRIES OF THE EUROPE REGION ITU Regional Initiative for Europe on Broadband Infrastructure, Broadcasting and Spectrum Management © ITU November 2020 Version 1.2 5G Implementation in non-EU countries of the Europe Region ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This paper was developed by the ITU Office for Europe within the framework of the ITU Regional Initiative for Europe on broadband infrastructure, broadcasting and spectrum management. It was elaborated by ITU Office for Europe team including Mr. Iago Bojczuk, Junior Policy Analyst, and Mr. Julian McNeill, Consultant, under the supervision and direction of Mr. Jaroslaw Ponder, Head of ITU Office for Europe. Moreover, important feedback has been provided to this report by: - Electronic and Postal Communications Authority (AKEP), Albania; - Ministry of Infrastructure and Energy, Albania; - Communications Regulatory Agency (CRA), Bosnia and Herzegovina; - Post and Telecom Administration (PTA), Iceland; - Ministry of Communications of Israel; - Office for Communications of Liechtenstein; - Ministry of Economy and Infrastructure of Moldova; - National Regulatory Agency for Electronic Communications and Information Technology (ANRCETI); - Ministry of Economy, Montenegro; - Agency for Electronic Communications and Postal Services (EKIP), Montenegro; - Ministry of Information Society and Administration, North Macedonia; - Agency for Electronic Communications of North Macedonia; - Ministry of Trade, Tourism and Telecommunications, Serbia; - Information and Communication Technologies Authority, Turkey; - National Commission for the State Regulation of Communications and Informatization, Ukraine; - Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport (DCMS), United Kingdom; - Dicastero per la Comunicazione - Direzione Tecnologica, Vatican City. The paper was prepared as the background contribution to the ITU Regional Forum for Europe on 5G strategies, policies and implementation, held on 22 and 23 October 2020. -
EE LIMITED and (2) HUTCHISON 3G UK LIMITED
SECOND DIVISION, INNER HOUSE, COURT OF SESSION [2021] CSIH 27 XA63/20 Lord Justice Clerk Lord Malcolm Lord Doherty OPINION OF THE COURT delivered by LORD MALCOLM in the appeal by (1) EE LIMITED and (2) HUTCHISON 3G UK LIMITED Appellants against JOHN STEWART DUNCAN Respondent Appellants: Barne QC; Shepherd and Wedderburn LLP Respondent: Upton; Davidson Chalmers Stewart LLP 7 May 2021 [1] This is an appeal against a decision of the Lands Tribunal for Scotland (the tribunal). The main issue concerns the proper approach to paragraph 33(14) of the Electronic Communications Code contained in schedule 3A to the Communications Act 2003, as amended by the Digital Economy Act 2017. This new code replaced the old code set out in schedule 2 to the Telecommunications Act 1984. In terms of transitional provisions the old code remains relevant to agreements made under it. 2 Background [2] In 2003 Mr John Stewart Duncan (the owner) entered into an agreement with EE Ltd, which that company subsequently assigned to itself and Hutchison 3G UK Ltd (the operators), granting certain rights to keep, operate and inspect telecommunications apparatus on a site at Wester Dullatur Farm, North Lanarkshire. After the expiry of the agreed term in 2012 the lease has continued from year to year by way of tacit relocation (a rule under Scots law whereby a lease will be extended beyond its agreed term if neither party serves a notice ending the agreement). [3] In 2018 the operators sought agreement as to a new lease containing provisions designed to update the agreement in accordance with the minimum provisions imposed by the new code, including assignation rights; ability to share and upgrade the facilities without additional payment; and a “no network scheme” basis for the assessment of rental and compensation (which would be less costly for the operators). -
Anticipated Acquisition by BT Group Plc of EE Limited
Anticipated acquisition by BT Group plc of EE Limited Appendices and glossary Appendix A: Terms of reference and conduct of the inquiry Appendix B: Industry background Appendix C: Financial performance of companies Appendix D: Regulation Appendix E: Transaction and merger rationale Appendix F: Retail mobile Appendix G: Spectrum, capacity, and speed Appendix H: Fixed-mobile bundles Appendix I: Wholesale mobile: total foreclosure analysis Appendix J: Wholesale mobile: partial foreclosure analysis Appendix K: Mobile backhaul: input foreclosure Appendix L: Retail fixed broadband: Market A Appendix M: Retail broadband: superfast broadband Glossary APPENDIX A Terms of reference and conduct of the inquiry Terms of reference 1. In exercise of its duty under section 33(1) of the Enterprise Act 2002 (the Act) the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) believes that it is or may be the case that: (a) arrangements are in progress or in contemplation which, if carried into effect, will result in the creation of a relevant merger situation in that: (i) enterprises carried on by, or under the control of, BT Group plc will cease to be distinct from enterprises currently carried on by, or under the control of, EE Limited; and (ii) section 23(1)(b) of the Act is satisfied; and (b) the creation of that situation may be expected to result in a substantial lessening of competition within a market or markets in the United Kingdom (the UK) for goods or services, including the supply of: (i) wholesale access and call origination services to mobile virtual network operators; and (ii) fibre mobile backhaul services to mobile network operators. -
Financial Results Results for the Half Year to 30 September 2019 BT Group Plc 31 October 2019
Financial results Results for the half year to 30 September 2019 BT Group plc 31 October 2019 BT Group plc (BT.L) today announced its results for the half year to 30 September 2019. Key strategic developments: • Launched a host of new products for consumer and business segments, including the new Halo converged product plans and BT Mobile 5G • Introduced a range of new service initiatives including bringing the BT brand to the high street in over 600 EE/BT dual- branded stores, and to answer 100% of customer calls in the UK & Ireland from January 2020 • Continued to make progress on the BT modernisation agenda, including delivering over £1.1bn transformation benefits, announcing the first locations in our Better Workplace Programme, and disposal of BT Fleet Solutions • Outlined our Skills for Tomorrow programme to provide digital skills training for 10m UK children, families and businesses Operational: • 5G network live in over 20 cities and large towns; 5G smartphone plans now available on both EE and BT brands • Openreach announced the launch of new FTTP 1Gbps and 550Mbps products. FTTP rollout at c.23k premises passed per week; 4.2m ultrafast (FTTP and Gfast) premises passed to date; currently announced plans to build FTTP in 103 locations • Consumer fixed ARPC £38.5, broadly flat year on year; postpaid mobile ARPC £20.8, down 5.5% year on year due to impact of regulation and continued trend towards SIM-only; RGUs per address up to 2.38 • Postpaid mobile churn remains low at 1.2% in Q2 despite impact of auto switching; fixed churn at -
The Dominance and Monopolies Review, Fifth Edition
Dominance and Monopolies Review Fifth Edition Editors Maurits Dolmans and Henry Mostyn lawreviews the Dominance and Monopolies Review The Dominance and Monopolies Review Reproduced with permission from Law Business Research Ltd. This article was first published in The Dominance and Monopolies Review, - Edition 5 (published in July 2017 – editors Maurits Dolmans and Henry Mostyn) For further information please email [email protected] Dominance and Monopolies Review Fifth Edition Editors Maurits Dolmans and Henry Mostyn lawreviews PUBLISHER Gideon Roberton SENIOR BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT MANAGER Nick Barette BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT MANAGERS Thomas Lee, Joel Woods ACCOUNT MANAGERS Pere Aspinall, Sophie Emberson, Laura Lynas, Jack Bagnall MARKETING AND READERSHIP COORDINATOR Rebecca Mogridge RESEARCHER Arthur Hunter EDITORIAL COORDINATOR Gavin Jordan HEAD OF PRODUCTION Adam Myers PRODUCTION EDITOR Martin Roach SUBEDITOR Janina Godowska CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER Paul Howarth Published in the United Kingdom by Law Business Research Ltd, London 87 Lancaster Road, London, W11 1QQ, UK © 2017 Law Business Research Ltd www.TheLawReviews.co.uk No photocopying: copyright licences do not apply. The information provided in this publication is general and may not apply in a specific situation, nor does it necessarily represent the views of authors’ firms or their clients. Legal advice should always be sought before taking any legal action based on the information provided. The publishers accept no responsibility for any acts or omissions contained