The Science of Marine Reserves (2Nd Edition, United States Version)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Blue Paradox: Preemptive Overfishing in Marine Reserves
PAPER The blue paradox: Preemptive overfishing in COLLOQUIUM marine reserves Grant R. McDermotta,1,2, Kyle C. Mengb,c,d,1,2, Gavin G. McDonaldb,e, and Christopher J. Costellob,c,d,e aDepartment of Economics, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403; bBren School of Environmental Science & Management, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106; cDepartment of Economics, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106; dNational Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA 02138; and eMarine Science Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 Edited by Jane Lubchenco, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, and approved July 25, 2018 (received for review March 9, 2018) Most large-scale conservation policies are anticipated or an- This line of reasoning suggests that the anticipation of a new nounced in advance. This risks the possibility of preemptive conservation policy may give rise to a set of incentives that is resource extraction before the conservation intervention goes distinct from—but possibly just as important as—the incentives into force. We use a high-resolution dataset of satellite-based fish- arising from the policy’s implementation. While this kind of pre- ing activity to show that anticipation of an impending no-take emptive behavior has been well-documented for landowners, gun marine reserve undermines the policy by triggering an unin- owners, and owners of natural resource extraction rights, it has tended race-to-fish. We study one of the world’s largest marine not been studied in the commons. For vast swaths of the ocean, reserves, the Phoenix Islands Protected Area (PIPA), and find that no single owner has exclusive rights and so must compete against fishers more than doubled their fishing effort once this area was others for extraction. -
Marine Protected Areas (Mpas) in Management 1 of Coral Reefs
ISRS BRIEFING PAPER 1 MARINE PROTECTED AREAS (MPAS) IN MANAGEMENT 1 OF CORAL REEFS SYNOPSIS Marine protected areas (MPAs) may stop all extractive uses, protect particular species or locally prohibit specific kinds of fishing. These areas may be established for reasons of conservation, tourism or fisheries management. This briefing paper discusses the potential uses of MPAs, factors that have affected their success and the conditions under which they are likely to be effective. ¾ MPAs are often established as a conservation tool, allowing protection of species sensitive to fishing and thus preserving intact ecosystems, their processes and biodiversity and ultimately their resilience to perturbations. ¾ Increases in charismatic species such as large groupers in MPAs combined with the perception that the reefs there are relatively pristine mean that MPAs can play a significant role in tourism. ¾ By reducing fishing mortality, effective MPAs have positive effects locally on abundances, biomass, sizes and reproductive outputs of many exploitable site- attached reef species. ¾ Because high biomass of focal species is sought but this is quickly depleted and is slow to recover, poaching is a problem in most reef MPAs. ¾ Target-species ‘spillover’ into fishing areas is likely occurring close to the MPA boundaries and benefits will often be related to MPA size. Evidence for MPAs acting as a source of larval export remains weak. ¾ The science of MPAs is at an early stage of its development and MPAs will rarely suffice alone to address the main objectives of fisheries management; concomitant control of effort and other measures are needed to reduce fishery impacts, sustain yields or help stocks to recover. -
Global Patterns in Marine Mammal Distributions
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION I. TAXONOMIC DECISIONS In this work we followed Wilson and Reeder (2005) and Reeves, Stewart, and Clapham’s (2002) taxonomy. In the last 20 years several new species have been described such as Mesoplodon perrini (Dalebout 2002), Orcaella heinsohni (Beasley 2005), and the recognition of several species have been proposed for orcas (Perrin 1982, Pitman et al. 2007), Bryde's whales (Kanda et al. 2007), Blue whales (Garrigue et al. 2003, Ichihara 1996), Tucuxi dolphin (Cunha et al. 2005, Caballero et al. 2008), and other marine mammals. Since we used the conservation status of all species following IUCN (2011), this work is based on species recognized by this IUCN to keep a standardized baseline. II. SPECIES LIST List of the species included in this paper, indicating their conservation status according to IUCN (2010.4) and its range area. Order Family Species IUCN 2010 Freshwater Range area km2 Enhydra lutris EN A2abe 1,084,750,000,000 Mustelidae Lontra felina EN A3cd 996,197,000,000 Odobenidae Odobenus rosmarus DD 5,367,060,000,000 Arctocephalus australis LC 1,674,290,000,000 Arctocephalus forsteri LC 1,823,240,000,000 Arctocephalus galapagoensis EN A2a 167,512,000,000 Arctocephalus gazella LC 39,155,300,000,000 Arctocephalus philippii NT 163,932,000,000 Arctocephalus pusillus LC 1,705,430,000,000 Arctocephalus townsendi NT 1,045,950,000,000 Carnivora Otariidae Arctocephalus tropicalis LC 39,249,100,000,000 Callorhinus ursinus VU A2b 12,935,900,000,000 Eumetopias jubatus EN A2a 3,051,310,000,000 Neophoca cinerea -
The Role of Marine Protected Areas in Sustaining Fisheries
The role of marine protected areas in sustaining fisheries Callum Roberts University of York, UK After World War II there was much optimism that fisheries could feed the World. But at the beginning of the 21st century, we are not so sure. Quota management of fisheries in the European Union has failed to deliver sustainability 100 80 60 40 20 Percentage of Quota Fish Stocks of Quota Percentage 0 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 Year Healthy At risk In danger Data from ICES Cod decline in the Kattegat, North Sea Extinction is the ultimate in unsustainable fishing, whether or not the species of concern are targets of the fishery What is missing from fishery management? • Real provision for habitat protection and recovery • Precautionary targets • Resolute enforcement Objectives of marine reserves Maintaining ecosystem processes and services Conservation Sustaining fisheries Tree cover www.worldwildlife.org/oceans/pdfs/fishery_effects.pdf Spillover Reproduction & Dispersal Colonization & Growth Abundance Diversity What is the evidence that reserves work? Reserves all over the world show dramatic increases in spawning stocks Usually by at least 2-3 times in 5-10 years Long-term studies in New Zealand, Philippines, Florida and many other countries show strong responses to reserve protection Fish in reserves do live longer, grow larger and produce more eggs Egg production from protected fish stocks increases by much more than stock biomass Catches do increase Soufrière Marine Management Area, St. Lucia: Established 1995 35% of reef area closed -
World Bank Document
37741 Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized 37741 The World Bank Group GEOGRAPHY ECONOMY / SOCIETY 1818 H Street, N. W. Country Of ce Manila Area: Total ..................................... 300,000 sq. km GDP (2005) .................................................. 5,379 B Washington D. C. 20433, U.S.A. 23rd Floor, The Taipan Place Land ..................................... 298,170 sq. km GDP growth rate (2005) ..................................5.1% Tel: 202-473-1000 F. Ortigas Jr. Ave. (formerly Emerald Ave.) Water ....................................... 1,830 sq. km GDP – composition by sector: Fax:202-477-6391 Ortigas Center, Pasig City, Philippines Boundaries: Agriculture ................................................14% www.worldbank.org Tel: 63-2-637-5855 to 64 North: Balintang Channel Industry .....................................................33% Fax:63-2-637-5870; 917-3050 South: Sulu and Celebes Seas Services ......................................................53% www.worldbank.org.ph East: Philippine Sea/Pacific Ocean Unemployment rate (2005): ..........................10.3% West: South China Sea Gross Domestic Investment/GDP: ..............15.7% December 2005 Coastline: .............................................. 36,289 km Exports of goods and services/GDP: ...........46.4% Maritime claims: Gross domestic savings/GDP: .....................20.1% Total territorial water area incl. Gross national savings/GDP: .......................18.2% -
Little Fish, Big Impact: Managing a Crucial Link in Ocean Food Webs
little fish BIG IMPACT Managing a crucial link in ocean food webs A report from the Lenfest Forage Fish Task Force The Lenfest Ocean Program invests in scientific research on the environmental, economic, and social impacts of fishing, fisheries management, and aquaculture. Supported research projects result in peer-reviewed publications in leading scientific journals. The Program works with the scientists to ensure that research results are delivered effectively to decision makers and the public, who can take action based on the findings. The program was established in 2004 by the Lenfest Foundation and is managed by the Pew Charitable Trusts (www.lenfestocean.org, Twitter handle: @LenfestOcean). The Institute for Ocean Conservation Science (IOCS) is part of the Stony Brook University School of Marine and Atmospheric Sciences. It is dedicated to advancing ocean conservation through science. IOCS conducts world-class scientific research that increases knowledge about critical threats to oceans and their inhabitants, provides the foundation for smarter ocean policy, and establishes new frameworks for improved ocean conservation. Suggested citation: Pikitch, E., Boersma, P.D., Boyd, I.L., Conover, D.O., Cury, P., Essington, T., Heppell, S.S., Houde, E.D., Mangel, M., Pauly, D., Plagányi, É., Sainsbury, K., and Steneck, R.S. 2012. Little Fish, Big Impact: Managing a Crucial Link in Ocean Food Webs. Lenfest Ocean Program. Washington, DC. 108 pp. Cover photo illustration: shoal of forage fish (center), surrounded by (clockwise from top), humpback whale, Cape gannet, Steller sea lions, Atlantic puffins, sardines and black-legged kittiwake. Credits Cover (center) and title page: © Jason Pickering/SeaPics.com Banner, pages ii–1: © Brandon Cole Design: Janin/Cliff Design Inc. -
Caporiacco, 1954) (Araneae, Salticidae
A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 420: Validation11–18 (2014) of Eustiromastix guianae (Caporiacco, 1954) (Araneae, Salticidae)... 11 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.420.6977 SHORT COMMUNICATION www.zookeys.org Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Validation of Eustiromastix guianae (Caporiacco, 1954) (Araneae, Salticidae) with a first description of the female, and additions to the salticid fauna of French Guiana Cyril Courtial1, Lionel Picard2, Frédéric Ysnel3, Julien Pétillon3 1 6 Avenue Pierre Donzelot 34B 35700 Rennes, France 2 13 rue Jean-Baptiste Carpeaux 56000 Vannes, France 3 Equipe Biodiversité et Gestion des Territoires URU 420, UFR SVE, Université de Rennes I, 263 Avenue du Général Leclerc 35042 Rennes Cedex, France Corresponding author: Cyril Courtial ([email protected]) Academic editor: J. Miller | Received 8 January 2014 | Accepted 23 May 2014 | Published 25 June 2014 http://zoobank.org/85C8AD7D-7A46-4EE9-A666-942CA89BCCF3 Citation: Courtial C, Picard L, Ysnel F, Pétillon J (2014) Validation of Eustiromastix guianae (Caporiacco, 1954) (Araneae, Salticidae) with a first description of the female, and additions to the salticid fauna of French Guiana. ZooKeys 420: 11–18. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.420.6977 Abstract In this paper, we validate the doubtful species status of E. guianae, with redescriptions of (supposedly lost) type and holotype males, and a first description of the female. Both sexes are measured and illustrated by pictures of habitus and copulatory organs. Seventeen new salticid species for French Guiana are also re- ported and a detailed catalogue of all salticid species from the Trinité National Nature Reserve is provided. Keywords Jumping spider, tropical forest, South America, doubtful species Introduction The history of arachnology in French Guiana started in 1871 with the publication of the first catalogue by Władysław Taczanowski (1871, 1872), but it remained relatively poor compared with that of adjacent countries (Brazil, Guiana, Peru, etc.). -
SA Spider Checklist
REVIEW ZOOS' PRINT JOURNAL 22(2): 2551-2597 CHECKLIST OF SPIDERS (ARACHNIDA: ARANEAE) OF SOUTH ASIA INCLUDING THE 2006 UPDATE OF INDIAN SPIDER CHECKLIST Manju Siliwal 1 and Sanjay Molur 2,3 1,2 Wildlife Information & Liaison Development (WILD) Society, 3 Zoo Outreach Organisation (ZOO) 29-1, Bharathi Colony, Peelamedu, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu 641004, India Email: 1 [email protected]; 3 [email protected] ABSTRACT Thesaurus, (Vol. 1) in 1734 (Smith, 2001). Most of the spiders After one year since publication of the Indian Checklist, this is described during the British period from South Asia were by an attempt to provide a comprehensive checklist of spiders of foreigners based on the specimens deposited in different South Asia with eight countries - Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka. The European Museums. Indian checklist is also updated for 2006. The South Asian While the Indian checklist (Siliwal et al., 2005) is more spider list is also compiled following The World Spider Catalog accurate, the South Asian spider checklist is not critically by Platnick and other peer-reviewed publications since the last scrutinized due to lack of complete literature, but it gives an update. In total, 2299 species of spiders in 67 families have overview of species found in various South Asian countries, been reported from South Asia. There are 39 species included in this regions checklist that are not listed in the World Catalog gives the endemism of species and forms a basis for careful of Spiders. Taxonomic verification is recommended for 51 species. and participatory work by arachnologists in the region. -
Guidelines for Marine Protected Areas
Guidelines for Marine Protected Areas World Commission on Protected Areas (WCPA) Guidelines for Marine MPAs are needed in all parts of the world – but it is vital to get the support Protected Areas of local communities Edited and coordinated by Graeme Kelleher Adrian Phillips, Series Editor IUCN Protected Areas Programme IUCN Publications Services Unit Rue Mauverney 28 219c Huntingdon Road CH-1196 Gland, Switzerland Cambridge, CB3 0DL, UK Tel: + 41 22 999 00 01 Tel: + 44 1223 277894 Fax: + 41 22 999 00 15 Fax: + 44 1223 277175 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Best Practice Protected Area Guidelines Series No. 3 IUCN The World Conservation Union The World Conservation Union CZM-Centre These Guidelines are designed to be used in association with other publications which cover relevant subjects in greater detail. In particular, users are encouraged to refer to the following: Case studies of MPAs and their Volume 8, No 2 of PARKS magazine (1998) contributions to fisheries Existing MPAs and priorities for A Global Representative System of Marine establishment and management Protected Areas, edited by Graeme Kelleher, Chris Bleakley and Sue Wells. Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, The World Bank, and IUCN. 4 vols. 1995 Planning and managing MPAs Marine and Coastal Protected Areas: A Guide for Planners and Managers, edited by R.V. Salm and J.R. Clark. IUCN, 1984. Integrated ecosystem management The Contributions of Science to Integrated Coastal Management. GESAMP, 1996 Systems design of protected areas National System Planning for Protected Areas, by Adrian G. Davey. Best Practice Protected Area Guidelines Series No. -
Yol.42 No. I 2001 I Ll/3 Jtule Uj I Tllllpltlc L T't Yclvw6j - ^ 20 Brown, Diesmos E Ahaln
l The State of Phtllptne Herpetolagl 19 THE STATE OF PHILIPPINE HERPETOLOGY AND THE CHALLENGES FOR THE NEXT DECADE Daring tbe tatne perirtd. tbere bat been let.r actiuity in ecological research and conteruatittu. ancl little or no actiuity in disciplines tach at behaaior, nicroeao/ution, reproductiue Reru M. BnowN, Anvnv C. Dtrslros, aNo ANcn C. biol- lgy, 0r popalation biologl'. Ix thit paper we reaiew a nodel Ar-cnt-e fetu studies and point out where others are hadly needed. Auailable biogeographic analyset, combined with new, First, there is a great need for more new basic re- unpa[tlished data, dent.on.rtrclte thdt the distributions of anphib- searc h focused on b iodive rs i ry conservat io tt, includittg system- iant and reptiles in tbe Pbilippines haue been ttrongly influ- atics, ecology, behavior, and current patterns of distibution enced by the nid- to late-P /ei.ttlcene format ion of seuera/ aggre- and ab u ndanc e. W itho ttt s uc h fundantenta I info r nat io n, c o n- gate island complexes at well at by clinatic gradients attociated servatton planning will be incornplete at best. with eleaation and a,ttbrlp0geTtic distarbances (priraarily cle- Heaney et al., 1999:315. forestation). Each Plei-rtocene aggrega.te island complex it a major center of biologica/ diaersity, and within tbese najor (and seu- The information needed to make sense of Asian eral other rninor) Iand nass amalgamatilnt, there exist numer- herpetology is not lurking in tlrc Literature; it is still out tlrcre in ous tub-centers of endernism and diuersitl centered on itolated tlrc rice padtlies and in the vanishing patches of nontane for- ntountains or mountain ranget. -
Second Edition
Second Edition: International Version © PISCO 2007 Table of Contents The Partnership for Interdisciplinary Studies of Coastal Oceans (PISCO) produced this report in collaboration with the Communication Partnership for Science and the Sea 1 What Is a Marine Reserve? (COMPASS, www.compassonline.org). 2 Marine Reserves Studied PISCO is a consortium of academic scientists at Oregon State University; University of Around the World California, Santa Barbara; University of California, Santa Cruz; and Stanford University. PISCO advances the understanding of coastal marine ecosystems and communicates scientific knowledge to diverse audiences. EFFECTS OF MARINE RESERVES Visit www.piscoweb.org/outreach/pubs/reserves for a downloadable PDF version of 4 Effects of Marine Reserves this report; companion materials, including links to scientific references listed herein; and Inside Their Borders information about PISCO. To request printed copies of this report, contact one of the addresses listed on the back cover. Copying and distributing this report is permissible, 6 How Long Does It Take to See provided copies are not sold and the material is properly credited to PISCO. a Response? 8 Case Study: Kisite Marine National Park, Kenya Convening Lead Authors 9 Case Study: Leigh Marine Jane Lubchenco (Oregon State University) Reserve, New Zealand Steven Gaines (University of California, Santa Barbara) Kirsten Grorud-Colvert (Oregon State University) 10 Effects of Marine Reserves Satie Airamé (University of California, Santa Barbara) Beyond Their Borders Stephen -
Redescription and R Iption and R Iption and Resolution of Some Neotr
Redescription and resolution of some Neotropical species of jumping spiders described by Caporiacco and description of a new species (Araneae: Salticidae) Gustavo R. S. Ruiz & Antonio D. Brescovit Laboratório de Artrópodes, Instituto Butantan. Avenida Vital Brazil 1500, 05503-900 São Paulo, São Paulo, Brasil. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] ABSTRACT. Type specimens of some of Caporiacco’s Neotropical species are revised. The taxonomy of his species from French Guiana, whose type specimens are lost, is considered. The types of Corythalia hadzji Caporiacco, 1947, Corythalia luctuosa Caporiacco 1954, Hypaeus barromachadoi Caporiacco, 1947 and Naubolus melloleitaoi Caporiacco, 1947 are redescribed. The following new synonymies are established: Freya guianensis Caporiacco, 1947 = Chira spinipes (Taczanowski, 1871) syn. nov..; Hypaeus bivittatus Caporiacco, 1947 = Hypaeus barromachadoi Caporiacco, 1947 syn. nov. New combinations are: Agelista petrusewiczi Caporiacco, 1947 = Noegus petrusewiczi (Caporiacco, 1947) comb. nov..; Albionella chickeringi Caporiacco, 1954 = Mago chickeringi (Caporiacco, 1954) comb. nov..; Asaracus pauciaculeis Caporiacco, 1947 = Mago pauciaculeis (Caporiacco, 1947) comb. nov..; Cerionesta leucomystax Caporiacco, 1947 = Sassacus leucomystax (Caporiacco, 1947) comb. nov..; Lapsias guianensis Caporiacco, 1947 = Cobanus guianensis (Caporiacco, 1947) comb. nov..; Phiale modestissima Caporiacco, 1947 = Asaracus modestissimus (Caporiacco, 1947) comb. nov. The species Noegus lodovicoi sp. nov. is also