Felix Mckittrick in the Guadalupe Mountains of Texas and New Mexico -.:: GEOCITIES.Ws

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Felix Mckittrick in the Guadalupe Mountains of Texas and New Mexico -.:: GEOCITIES.Ws Guadalupe Mountains National Park 325 Chapter 38 The Butterfield Overland Stagecoach through Guadalupe Pass JIM W. ADAMS is an American Association of Petroleum Geologists (AAPG) certi- fied petroleum geologist in Midland, Texas. He worked as a geological advisor for Exxon, U.S.A. for 43 years. The Mexican War ended with the they authorized an overland mail con - United States purchasing large tracts of tract. They made the mistake of leaving land in what is now the southwestern the choice of the route up to the post - part of the United States. The war also master general. Well, it so happened that settled the right of Texas to enter the the postmaster general was from the Union and, just two years after that, gold South, and he insisted on a southern was discovered in California. So many route. people rushed to California just two years later and in 1850 California joined At about that same time, an interesting the Union. It’s hard for me to realize that character by the name of John this happened 26 years before Colorado Butterfield came on the scene. His home had enough people to join the Union. At was in Utica, New York, and as a boy the any rate, there was a great clamor in con - sound of the stagecoach as it roared by gress and in the East and West both, es- in a cloud of dust thrilled him. He deter- pecially the West, for an overland mail mined that when he grew up he wanted service, an overland mail contract, and to be a stagecoach driver, and he did. He an overland stagecoach. As usual, con - was so good at it that he was soon made gress did nothing and then finally in 1857 manager of the line and he branched out Figure 1. Butterfield overland mail and pony express route. 326 Adams Figure 2. The Butterfield “Celerity” stage wagon was designed in the coach factory of James Goold in Albany, New York, where, in 1857, 100 of these wagons were built and placed in the overland service in 1858. They were more adaptable to the roughness of mountain and desert country than the regular high bodied coach. The seats were not upholstered but were constructed so that the backs could be lowered to make a bed, permitting the passengers to take turns sleeping at night. This type of vehicle was used exclusively between Springfield, Missouri; or Fort Smith Arkansas; and Los Angeles, California. Drawing by R. P. Conkling. to form stagecoach lines of his own, three different makers. One particular which he later converted into railroads. manufacturer from Albany, New York By then he was wealthy. He invested made the Celerity Wagon. Butterfield heavily in real estate and in steam ships thought that the design with the front on Lake Erie. As a staunch Yankee, wheels smaller than the rear wheels Butterfield submitted a bid for the would be much better in the Rocky northern route of the overland mail to Mountain West, and it was. commence from the railhead of Saint Jo - seph, Missouri. The route would go up Several years earlier Butterfield had into Nebraska, Wyoming, Salt Lake City, joined with two other New York State across Nevada and across the scenic Si- express owners, Henry Wells and Will- erra Nevada into Sacramento, with the iam Fargo, to form the American Ex- mail going on down by steamboat to San press company. He remained the direc- Francisco. But as a practical stagecoach tor and vice president of that firm until man, he realized that the heavy snows of the day he died, and that firm is still alive the Rocky Mountains and the Sierra Ne - and kicking today. Nobody thought vada would be formidable barriers to Butterfield could meet the stiff mail con - any efficient schedule for the mail, and a tract of two stagecoaches per week with more practical route lay to the south. a maximum travel time of 25 days be- Butterfield made a very shrewd sugges- tween Saint Louis and San Francisco. tion of two routes: one starting at Saint They accused him of stock throwing. Louis and the other one starting at Why, that was an average of 112 miles a Memphis, and the two routes joining at day. Existing lines were only making 25 Fort Smith, Arkansas, then going miles a day. He simply had heard the through Indian Territory across Texas post horn again and could not resist this and what was later New Mexico, Ari- biggest challenge of his life, because he zona, and California. He won the was already wealthy and really did not $600,000 a year mail contract and he or- need that job. Those who scoffed at the ganized the overland mail company with project did not count on the hard- work - a capital stock of $2 million. He spent $1 ing genius of John Butterfield. He never million of that the very first year on took a day of vacation in his life. He equipment and supplies. One thing he pored over the reports of boundary did was purchase stagecoaches from commissioner Bartlett and Army Cap - Guadalupe Mountains National Park 327 tains Marcy and Pope. The existing mail sengers from Saint Louis westward to line from San Antonio to San Diego over the rail’s end at Tipton, Missouri. John the Jim Burch line was a very haphazard Butterfield and Waterman Ormsby were affair. One or two wagons a month plod- two of the passengers. Since the project ded along and stopped each night for the was bound to fail, nobody saw them off. passengers to cook their own meals and The first stagecoach driver was his son, bed down on the ground. Well, that just John J. Butterfield, Jr., and he drove the was not the way John Butterfield oper- stagecoach all the way to Fort Smith, Ar- ated. He built stagecoach stations all kansas, except when the old man him- along the route. He put his coaches on a self took over the reins. Parent schedule. The meals were ready for the Butterfield disembarked the first stage - passengers when they arrived, and he coach at Fort Smith, and that’s as far only allowed 20 minutes for meals and west as he ever got. The first stage went less for a change of horses. He also put through Indian Territory and crossed the lanterns on his coaches so that his stage - Red River into the northeast corner of coaches rolled both day and night. But Texas at Colbert’s Forge. They went what a task—almost 3,000 miles of through the tiny hamlets of Gainesville mostly unimproved trail through hostile and Sherman and they went on to Fort Indian country! Postmaster General Belknap and Fort Phantom Hill. Both of Brown called this the longest stagecoach these posts had been abandoned by the line in the world. It was actually 2,795 Army, but Butterfield went into the ruins miles long. There were only three cities and built stagecoach stations in both of along the entire route. Franklin, which them. From Fort Phantom Hill they we know as El Paso, Tucson, and a small went through Buffalo Gap, 11 miles north town of 6,000 people called Los Ange - of Abilene, and they came to Fort les. He built 139 way stations along this Chadburn. This first Butterfield stage - route. That was expanded later to 150. coach trek was ignored by the eastern His son, Daniel Adams Butterfield, drew United States, but in every fort and town up a schedule between these stations. in the West that it came through, it set Old John had a photographic memory off riotous demonstrations. The arrival and his associates were inspired by his of the first westbound mail in Fort enthusiasm. He could tell you the sched- Chadburn was an occasion for celebra- ule and the mileage between any of tion on the part of the drivers, and those stations, though he never saw Ormsby said they appeared to have been most of them. having a jolly good time for a long time before we got there. Any excuse, you Our knowledge of the Butterfield stage know. comes from two chief sources. First, the New York Herald was the only newspa- Indians, having raided the corrals a few per that thought the event was important days earlier, left only wild unbroken enough to send a 23-year- old cub re - mules. When they hitched the wagon to porter with the interesting name of these wild mules, they dashed off in a Waterman Lily Ormsby along on the first mad plunge through the trees where the stagecoach west. His interesting narra- top of the wagon with its canvas cover- tive was published in serial form as it was ing was completely demolished. This received. Second some 70 years later threw Ormsby out of the stagecoach and when Roscoe Conklin retired from the he almost refused to go any further, but Army in El Paso, he and his wife drove he did so, saying, “If I had any property, along the entire 3,000 mile route three I certainly would have made out a hasty times, documenting both the route and will.” They then crossed the Colorado the preservation of the stations, and River [of Texas] and ruts can still be seen their three-volume report is an invalu- there where the Butterfield stages able contribution. crossed. The adobe station there fed him a breakfast of mesquite beans and pork. On September 14, 1858, a coach started I thought mesquite beans in September out from San Francisco and two days were hard as a rock, but that’s what they later the train took the mail and five pas- apparently had.
Recommended publications
  • Promise Beheld and the Limits of Place
    Promise Beheld and the Limits of Place A Historic Resource Study of Carlsbad Caverns and Guadalupe Mountains National Parks and the Surrounding Areas By Hal K. Rothman Daniel Holder, Research Associate National Park Service, Southwest Regional Office Series Number Acknowledgments This book would not be possible without the full cooperation of the men and women working for the National Park Service, starting with the superintendents of the two parks, Frank Deckert at Carlsbad Caverns National Park and Larry Henderson at Guadalupe Mountains National Park. One of the true joys of writing about the park system is meeting the professionals who interpret, protect and preserve the nation’s treasures. Just as important are the librarians, archivists and researchers who assisted us at libraries in several states. There are too many to mention individuals, so all we can say is thank you to all those people who guided us through the catalogs, pulled books and documents for us, and filed them back away after we left. One individual who deserves special mention is Jed Howard of Carlsbad, who provided local insight into the area’s national parks. Through his position with the Southeastern New Mexico Historical Society, he supplied many of the photographs in this book. We sincerely appreciate all of his help. And finally, this book is the product of many sacrifices on the part of our families. This book is dedicated to LauraLee and Lucille, who gave us the time to write it, and Talia, Brent, and Megan, who provide the reasons for writing. Hal Rothman Dan Holder September 1998 i Executive Summary Located on the great Permian Uplift, the Guadalupe Mountains and Carlsbad Caverns national parks area is rich in prehistory and history.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography
    Bibliography Articles, Chapters, Journals and Series Abbey, Edward. "Guadalupe's Trails in Summer." National Geographic 156, no. 1 (July 1979): 134-141. Allison, V.C. "Evening Bat Flight from Carlsbad Caverns." Journal of Mammalogy 18 (1937): 80- 82. Almaraz, Felix D. Jr. "An Uninviting Wilderness: The Plains of West Texas, 1534-1821." Great Plains Quarterly 12 (Summer 1992): 169-180. Armstrong, Ruth W. "Carlsbad's Golden Anniversary." National Parks and Conservation Magazine 54, no. 5 (May 1980): 4-8. Bailey, V. "Bats of the Carlsbad Cavern." National Geographic Magazine 48 (September 1925): 321-330. Baker, J.K. "Fossilization of Bat Skeletons in the Carlsbad Caverns" National Speleological Society Bulletin 25, part 1 (1963): 37-44. Barrett, Leonora. "Transportation, Supplies, and Quarters for the West Texas Frontier Under the Federal Military System 1848-1861." West Texas Historical Association Year Book V (June 1929): 95-108. Baugh, Timothy G."Ecology and Exchange: The Dynamics of Plains-Pueblo Interaction," Katherine A. Spielman, ed., Farmers, Hunters, and Colonists: Interaction Between the Southwest and the Southern Plains. Tucson: University of Arizona Press, 1991: 107-26. Berger, Meyer. "Nature's Awesome Underworld." Reader's Digest 31, no. 183 (July 1937): 77- 79. Black, D.M. "Cave Pearls in Carlsbad Caverns." Scientific Monthly 74 (1952): 206-210. ---------."Chinese Walls of New Cave, Carlsbad Caverns National Park." Science 123 (1956): 937-938. Black, T.H. The Origin and Development of the Carlsbad Caverns. Albuquerque: New Mexico Geological Society, Guidebook No. 5, 1954. Bretz, J.H. "Carlsbad Caverns and Other Caves of the Guadalupe Block." New Mexico Journal of Geology 57 (1949): 447-463.
    [Show full text]
  • Promise Beheld and the Limits of Place - Carlsbad Caverns
    Promise Beheld and the Limits of Place - Carlsbad Caverns Promise Beheld and the Limits of Place A Historic Resource Study of Carlsbad Caverns and Guadalupe Mountains National Parks and the Surrounding Areas by Hal K. Rothman Daniel Holder, Research Associate 1998 Department of the Interior National Park Service Washington, DC Continue Last Updated: 22-April-2003 http://www.nps.gov/history/history/online_books/CarlsbadCav/[12/14/2012 12:49:22 PM] Promise Beheld and the Limits of Place - Carlsbad Caverns - Table of Contents Promise Beheld and the Limits of Place A Historic Resource Study of Carlsbad Caverns and Guadalupe Mountains National Parks and the Surrounding Areas by Hal K. Rothman Daniel Holder, Research Associate 1998 Department of the Interior National Park Service Washington, DC TABLE OF CONTENTS Cover Page Acknowledgements, Executive Summary List of Illustrations, List of Maps Introduction Maps Chapter 1: From Prehistory to European Contact Chapter 2: The Spanish and Mexican Era Chapter 3: The American Appearance Chapter 4: The Military Seeks Control Chapter 5: Vectors of Settlement Photos 1 http://www.nps.gov/history/history/online_books/CarlsbadCav/toc.htm[12/14/2012 12:49:26 PM] Promise Beheld and the Limits of Place - Carlsbad Caverns - Table of Contents Photos 2 Chapter 6: Aspirations and Realities Chapter 7: A Stronger Federal Presence Chapter 8: Carlsbad Caverns in the Post-War Era Chapter 9: A Southern Cornerstone in a Subregion: Guadalupe Mountains National Park Epilogue: Parks in the Post Industrial World Bibliography Sources Consulted Note: There are some formatting differences between the original printed publication and the electronic version of this book.
    [Show full text]
  • Pratt Cabin Historic Structure Report, Guadalupe Mountains National Park
    HISTORIC STRUCTURE REPORT PRATT CABIN GUADALUPE MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK Heritage Conservation Program Drachman Institute College of Architecture & Landscape Architecture The University of Arizona In conjunction with: Desert Southwest/Cooperative Ecosystem Study Unit (DS/CESU) May 2012 ii HISTORIC STRUCTURE REPORT - PRATT CABIN - GUADALUPE MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK TABLE OF CONTENTS MANAGEMENT SUMMARY Executive Summary v Administrative Data viii DEVELOPMENTAL HISTORY Historical Background and Context 2 Chronology of Development and Use 6 Physical Description 12 Summary 13 Site/ Setting 14 Cabin Exterior: 17 Cabin Interior: 39 Building Support Systems 69 Garage Exterior 73 Garage Interior 78 TREATMENT AND USE Ultimate Treatment & Use 89 Requirements For Treatment 97 Alternatives For Treatment 99 SOURCES CONSULTED 100 APPENDICES A. Architectural Drawings of Historic Conditions 104 B. Architectural Drawings & Photographic Documentation of Existing Conditions 131 C. The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Preservation 155 D. The Secretary of the Interior’s Guidelines for Preservation Historic Buildings 156 HISTORIC STRUCTURE REPORT - PRATT CABIN - GUADALUPE MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK iii PROJECT TEAM This Historic Structure Report was carried out between the National Park Service (NPS) and The University of Arizona (UA) through the Desert Southwest/Cooperative Ecosystem Study Unit (DS/CESU) Joint Ventures Agreement. Principal Investigator R. Brooks Jeffery Heritage Conservation Drachman Institute College of Architecture & Landscape Architecture
    [Show full text]
  • Williams Ranch Historic Structure Report, Guadalupe Mountains National Park
    HISTORIC STRUCTURE REPORT WILLIAMS RANCH GUADALUPE MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK Drachman Institute | Heritage Conservation College of Architecture, Planning, and Landscape Architecture The University of Arizona In conjunction with: Desert Southwest Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit (DS-CESU) June 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Project Team .....................................................................................................................................ii Executive Summary .........................................................................................................................iv Project Data ..................................................................................................................................... vi Location and Access ........................................................................................................................ vii Chronology of Development and Use ............................................................................................2 Context and Early History .................................................................................................. 2 Construction/Owners and Residents ................................................................................. 3 Recent History and Park Development .............................................................................. 6 Park Management/Development and Resource Plans ....................................................... 7 Modifications and Rehabilitations ......................................................................................12
    [Show full text]
  • Guadalupe Mountains National Park Is Administered by the National Park Service, U.S
    Guadalupe WHAT TO SEE AND DO Until development is completed, public-use facili­ Mountains ties and staffing at this new national park are NATIONAL PARK • TEXAS extremely limited. People visiting the back country should be prepared to "rough it." McKittrick Canyon, noted for both its scenery and scientific importance, is open for day-use foot travel. A stream surfaces and disappears at var­ ious places along the canyon bottom. Rare and interesting plant communities are on the floor and lower slopes of the canyon. The canyon walls reveal segments of Capitan Reef and fore-reef and back-reef marine deposits. In autumn, the colors of the foliage are outstanding. While hiking in the canyon, please stay on the trail. Camping and backpacking. Camping is limited to the primitive drive-in campground in Pine Spring Canyon and designated back-country sites. Wood fires are not allowed in the back country, but containerized fuel stoves are permitted. The small, primitive campground at Pine Spring Can­ yon has tables, trash cans, and pit toilets. Water can be carried from the information station. The campground turnoff is 1.6 kilometers (1 mile) southwest of Frijole Information Station (see map). The park offers some fine opportunities to back­ pack in deserts and forests. However, water is not available and trails are faint. Before venturing into the park's interior, backpackers must make thor­ ough preparations and check in at the information station to obtain campsite locations and to register destination and time of departure. They also should *GPO: 1979 -281 367/1 check in upon their return.
    [Show full text]
  • Resource Stewardship Strategy (RSS) Is a Park Program Plan That Includes Strategies for Managing Natural and Cultural Resources
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Guadalupe Mountains National Park Texas Resource Stewardship Strategy June 2009 Guadalupe Mountains National Park Resource Stewardship Strategy Approved by:________________________________________________ _________________June 18, 2009 Superintendent, Guadalupe Mountains National Park Date Cover art: Watercolor of El Capitan and the Guadalupe Mountains by Phil Thys, Denver Service Center EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OVERVIEW OF A RESOURCE STEWARDSHIP STRATEGY A Resource Stewardship Strategy (RSS) is a park program plan that includes strategies for managing natural and cultural resources. It is based on science and scholarship and is designed to achieve and maintain desired conditions for resources. The desired conditions for resources are spelled out in a park’s general management plan (GMP). The resource stewardship strategy is a link between the general management plan and park strategic planning, where personnel and financial resources are allocated to implement stewardship activities. The major components of the RSS include: • a description of the park’s fundamental (and other important) resources and values and their desired conditions, • the status of knowledge of these resources, • identification of indicators and target values that allow the NPS to measure current conditions against desired conditions, • and comprehensive strategies and funding needed to achieve or maintain desired conditions. FUNDAMENTAL AND OTHER IMPORTANT RESOURCES AND VALUES – DESIRED CONDITIONS The first step in developing comprehensive strategies is to identify the resources and values that the National Park Service is responsible for preserving at Guadalupe Mountains National Park. Fundamental, and other important, resources and values support the purpose and significance of the park by identifying the characteristics (park features, processes, resources, and values) that park managers need to pay attention to.
    [Show full text]
  • Guadalupe Mountains National Park Foundation Document
    NATIONAL PARK SERVICE • U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Foundation Document Guadalupe Mountains National Park Texas August 2017 Foundation Document Dog Canyon L I N C O L N N A T I O N A L F O R E S T 137 NEW MEXICO NEW MEXICO TEXAS TEXAS S Wilderness Ridge N McKittrick Canyon I Pratt Cabin day use only A Marcus McKittrick T Ridge N Grotto U O M Blue Ridge Mescalero WILDERNESS AREA E Tejas P 62 Salt Basin Dunes 180 Bush U day use only Mountain L Nickel Creek Pine Top A D GYPSUM Frijole Ranch SAND A History Museum GUADALUPEDUNES MOUNTAINS U GYPSUM SAND G DUNES Guadalupe Peak The Pinery Butterfield Stage NATIONAL PARK Station Ruins Shumard Pine Bu Springs tt Canyon er fie Guadalupe Peak ld backcountry Sta Pine Springs ge campground R Visitor Center ou te Williams Ranch Parking Picnic area Campground Backcounty Campground Ranger station S A L T Horse and hiking trail B A S I N Hiking trail North Unpaved road 62 180 Paved road 54 Unpaved road (4-wheel-drive, 0 2 Kilometers high-clearance vehicles only) 0 2 Miles Guadalupe Mountains National Park Contents Mission of the National Park Service 1 Introduction 2 Part 1: Core Components 3 Brief Description of the Park 3 Park Purpose 5 Park Significance 6 Fundamental Resources and Values 7 Other Important Resources and Values 8 Interpretive Themes 9 Part 2: Dynamic Components 10 Special Mandates and Administrative Commitments 10 Special Mandates 10 Administrative Commitments 10 Assessment of Planning and Data Needs 11 Analysis of Fundamental Resources and Values 11 Analysis of Other Important Resources
    [Show full text]
  • Promise Beheld and the Limits of Place: a Historic Resource Study Of
    Carlsbad Caverns National Park (U.S. National Park Service) Page 10f3 National Park S@rvic@ U.S. D@partm@nt of the Int@rior Quicklinks: Main Elevator System Renovation Directions Operating honrs & seasons Sept 13 ' 1O-May'll- only smaller elevators to carry Fces & Reservations visitors in & out of cave. Visitors, allow more time to Can' Tours visit; anticipate wait for elevator, mainly on busy days, Broc hurcs & Publications i.e. holidays & spring break Speci al l 'ses/Prrmits Night SI,y Prog"ams Welcome to Carlsbad Cavel'l1s National ParI\:! Rocky slopes and canyons; cactus, grass, thorny shrubs, and the occasional tree, who could guess at the hidden treasures deep underground? Beneath this rugged land are more than 117 known caves - all formed when sulfuric acid dissolved the surrounding limestone. Cave Tours All visitors to the park should tour the main section of the cave, the Big Room self-guided tour. The 8.2-acre Big Room is partially wheelchair accessible. The Natural Entrance self-guided tour is also very impressive, but it is also more difficult due to the steepness of the trai I. Guided tours of varying difficulties are also available-from the self-guided areas of the Big Room to crawling through narrow passageways in the Hall ofthe White Giant or in Spider Cave. To reserve tickets for a guided tour, call our reservation service at 1.877.444.6777. more ... http://www.nps.gov/cave 10/13/2010 Promise Beheld and the Limits of Place - Carlsbad Caverns - Table of Contents Page 1 of2 Promise Beheld and the Limits of Place A Historic Resource Study of Carlsbad Caverns and Guadalupe Mountains Promise Beheld and the Limits of Place National Parks and the Surrounding Areas by Hal K.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Registration Form
    NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form 1. Name of Property Historic Name: Butterfield Overland Mail Route Corridor Other name/site number: Butterfield Overland Mail; Overland Mail; California Overland Mail; Upper Road; Upper Emigrant Road; Upper El Paso Road; Highway 62/180 Name of related multiple property listing: NA 2. Location Street & number: Guadalupe Mountains National Park, 400 Pine Canyon Road City or town: Salt Flat State: Texas County: Culberson and Hudspeth Not for publication: Vicinity: 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this nomination request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property meets does not meet the National Register criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant at the following levels of significance: national statewide local Applicable National Register Criteria: A B C D ___________________________ Signature of certifying official / Title Date State or Federal agency / bureau or Tribal Government In my opinion, the property meets does not meet the National Register criteria. _______________________________________________________________________ ___________________________ Signature of commenting or other official Date Texas Historical Commission_______________________________________________ State or Federal agency / bureau or Tribal Government 4. National Park Service Certification I hereby certify that the property is: ___ entered in the National Register ___ determined eligible for the National Register ___ determined not eligible for the National Register.
    [Show full text]
  • Guadalupe Mountains National Park Fire Management Plan
    Guadalupe Mountains National Park Fire Management Plan Table of Contents Chapter I. Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 1 Chapter II. Land Management Planning and Fire Policy .................................................................. 5 Management Policies Statements ................................................................................................. 5 Legislative Mandates .................................................................................................................... 5 Meeting General Management Plan and Resource Management Plan Objectives ....................... 6 Chapter III. Wildland Fire Management Strategies ........................................................................... 7 Fire Management Plan Goals and Objectives ............................................................................... 7 Wildland Fire Management Options ............................................................................................ 8 Physical and Biotic Characteristics .............................................................................................. 9 Historic Role of Fire in Park Ecosystems ................................................................................... 14 Fire Management Units .............................................................................................................. 17 Chapter IV. Wildland Fire Management Program Components ...................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ( Jul 1 1 Z014
    F\C.GiiVEG ~~80 NPS Form 10-900 r- OMB No. 1024..{) 18 United States Department of the Interior ( JUL 1 1 Z014 National Park Service I ' . ,;-,,;-(' \ '' •: •:1 rj :u IJi ·.VF') National Register of Historic Places Registration Form ,\ .L:lt L.l • \ .1 .0.~JO' '•;lu'' .~.t..! .t I • · •, · ~.~: 1 '>J\I~'' S ;":'r ' \• 1 ~ : \ l I· ' I '. ~ . - • ' I ' • • ) J • 1. Name of Property Historic Name: Butterfield Overland Mail Route Corridor Other name/site number: Butterfield Overland Mail; Overland Mail; California Overland Mail; Upper Road; Upper Emigrant Road; Upper El Paso Road; Highway 62/180 Name of related multiple property listing: NA 12. Location Street & number: Guadalupe Mountains National Park, 400 Pine Canyon Road City or town: Salt Flat State: Texas County: Culberson and Hudspeth Not for publication: 0 Vicinity: ~ I 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this li2l nomination 0 request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property liZ! meets 0 does not meet the National Register criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant at the following levels of significance: li2l national 0 statewide 0 local Applicable National Register Criteria: liZ! A 0 B 0 C liZ! D In my opinion, the p~woes n eet the National Register criteria. Signature of commenting or other official Date 14. National Park Service Certification I her c;.9-Y~ fy that the property is: _._/o_ enntt•ered in the National Register _ determined eligible for the National Register _ determined not eligible for the National Register.
    [Show full text]