DOCSLIB.ORG

Guadalupe Mountains National Park Foundation Document

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Guadalupe Mountains National Park Foundation Document NATIONAL PARK SERVICE • U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Foundation Document Guadalupe Mountains National Park Texas August 2017 Foundation Document Dog Canyon L I N C O L N N A T I O N A L F O R E S T 137 NEW MEXICO NEW MEXICO TEXAS TEXAS S Wilderness Ridge N McKittrick Canyon I Pratt Cabin day use only A Marcus McKittrick T Ridge N Grotto U O M Blue Ridge Mescalero WILDERNESS AREA E Tejas P 62 Salt Basin Dunes 180 Bush U day use only Mountain L Nickel Creek Pine Top A D GYPSUM Frijole Ranch SAND A History Museum GUADALUPEDUNES MOUNTAINS U GYPSUM SAND G DUNES Guadalupe Peak The Pinery Butterfield Stage NATIONAL PARK Station Ruins Shumard Pine Bu Springs tt Canyon er fie Guadalupe Peak ld backcountry Sta Pine Springs ge campground R Visitor Center ou te Williams Ranch Parking Picnic area Campground Backcounty Campground Ranger station S A L T Horse and hiking trail B A S I N Hiking trail North Unpaved road 62 180 Paved road 54 Unpaved road (4-wheel-drive, 0 2 Kilometers high-clearance vehicles only) 0 2 Miles Guadalupe Mountains National Park Contents Mission of the National Park Service 1 Introduction 2 Part 1: Core Components 3 Brief Description of the Park 3 Park Purpose 5 Park Significance 6 Fundamental Resources and Values 7 Other Important Resources and Values 8 Interpretive Themes 9 Part 2: Dynamic Components 10 Special Mandates and Administrative Commitments 10 Special Mandates 10 Administrative Commitments 10 Assessment of Planning and Data Needs 11 Analysis of Fundamental Resources and Values 11 Analysis of Other Important Resources and Values 25 Identification of Key Issues and Associated Planning and Data Needs 31 Planning and Data Needs 34 Part 3: Contributors 42 Guadalupe Mountains National Park 42 NPS Intermountain Region 42 Other NPS Staff 42 Partners 42 Photo Credits 42 Appendixes 43 Appendix A: Enabling Legislation and Legislative Acts for Guadalupe Mountains National Park 43 Appendix B: Traditionally Associated Tribes 49 Appendix C: Inventory of Administrative Commitments 50 Appendix D: Basics for Wilderness Stewardship 52 Foundation Document Guadalupe Mountains National Park Mission of the National Park Service The National Park Service (NPS) preserves unimpaired the natural and cultural resources and values of the national park system for the enjoyment, education, and inspiration of this and future generations. The National Park Service cooperates with partners to extend the benefits of natural and cultural resource conservation and outdoor recreation throughout this country and the world. The NPS core values are a framework in which the National Park Service accomplishes its mission. They express the manner in which, both individually and collectively, the National Park Service pursues its mission. The NPS core values are: · Shared stewardship: We share a commitment to resource stewardship with the global preservation community. · Excellence: We strive continually to learn and improve so that we may achieve the highest ideals of public service. · Integrity: We deal honestly and fairly with the public and one another. · Tradition: We are proud of it; we learn from it; we are not bound by it. · Respect: We embrace each other’s differences so that we may enrich the well- being of everyone. The National Park Service is a bureau within the Department of the Interior. While numerous national park system units were created prior to 1916, it was not until August 25, 1916, that President Woodrow Wilson signed the National Park Service Organic Act formally establishing the National Park Service. The national park system continues to grow and comprises more than 400 park units covering more than 84 million acres in every state, the District of Columbia, American Samoa, Guam, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands. These units include, but are not limited to, national parks, monuments, battlefields, military parks, historical parks, historic sites, lakeshores, seashores, recreation areas, scenic rivers and trails, and the White House. The variety and diversity of park units throughout the nation require a strong commitment to resource stewardship and management to ensure both the protection and enjoyment of these resources for future generations. The arrowhead was authorized as the official National Park Service emblem by the Secretary of the Interior on July 20, 1951. The sequoia tree and bison represent vegetation and wildlife, the mountains and water represent scenic and recreational values, and the arrowhead represents historical and archeological values. 1 Foundation Document Introduction Every unit of the national park system will have a foundational document to provide basic guidance for planning and management decisions—a foundation for planning and management. The core components of a foundation document include a brief description of the park as well as the park’s purpose, significance, fundamental resources and values, other important resources and values, and interpretive themes. The foundation document also includes special mandates and administrative commitments, an assessment of planning and data needs that identifies planning issues, planning products to be developed, and the associated studies and data required for park planning. Along with the core components, the assessment provides a focus for park planning activities and establishes a baseline from which planning documents are developed. A primary benefit of developing a foundation document is the opportunity to integrate and coordinate all kinds and levels of planning from a single, shared understanding of what is most important about the park. The process of developing a foundation document begins with gathering and integrating information about the park. Next, this information is refined and focused to determine what the most important attributes of the park are. The process of preparing a foundation document aids park managers, staff, and the public in identifying and clearly stating in one document the essential information that is necessary for park management to consider when determining future planning efforts, outlining key planning issues, and protecting resources and values that are integral to park purpose and identity. While not included in this document, a park atlas is also part of a foundation project. The atlas is a series of maps compiled from available geographic information system (GIS) data on natural and cultural resources, visitor use patterns, facilities, and other topics. It serves as a GIS-based support tool for planning and park operations. The atlas is published as a (hard copy) paper product and as geospatial data for use in a web mapping environment. The park atlas for Guadalupe Mountains National Park can be accessed online at: http://insideparkatlas.nps.gov/. 2 Guadalupe Mountains National Park Part 1: Core Components The core components of a foundation document include a brief description of the park, park purpose, significance statements, fundamental resources and values, other important resources and values, and interpretive themes. These components are core because they typically do not change over time. Core components are expected to be used in future planning and management efforts. Brief Description of the Park Guadalupe Mountains National Park was authorized by an act of Congress (Public Law 89-667) in 1966 to preserve “an area possessing outstanding geological values together with scenic and other natural values of great significance.” The park was formally established in 1972 with an area of 76,293 acres. Today, Guadalupe Mountains National Park includes 86,416 acres in west Texas, just south of the New Mexico state line and north of U.S. Highway 62/180. The Guadalupe Mountains rise more than 3,000 feet above the arid Chihuahuan Desert that surrounds them. El Capitan, the park’s most striking feature, is a 1,000-foot-high limestone cliff. Nearby Guadalupe Peak, 8,749 feet above sea level, is the highest point in Texas. The Guadalupe Mountains are part of a mostly buried 400-mile-long U-shaped fossil reef complex, Capitan Reef, which extends through a large area of west Texas and southeastern New Mexico. The longest exposed stretch of Capitan Reef, 12 miles of which is in the park, extends from Guadalupe Mountains National Park northeast almost to the city of Carlsbad, New Mexico, a distance of almost 40 miles. This 260-million- to 270-million-year-old reef is one of the world’s finest examples of an ancient reef system. The fossil- bearing strata of the park are also associated with the rich “oil patch” of the Delaware Basin of west Texas. Three internationally significant geological stratotype sections and points and numerous type sections of rock are present in the park. In 1977, the park was designated a Class I air quality area under the Clean Air Act. As a result, the park receives the highest level of protection under the act, and the National Park Service has “an affirmative responsibility” to protect sensitive air quality resources in the park, including vegetation, soils, waters, wildlife, and visibility [42 USC 7475(d)(2)(B)]. Air pollution sources with the potential to affect park resources must meet stringent emission control standards, and only a very small additional amount of pollution is permitted in the area. The act also sets a goal of preventing any future impairment in Class I areas and remedying any existing impairment of visibility from manmade air pollution. 3 Foundation Document In 1978, 46,850 acres of the park’s backcountry were formally designated by Congress as wilderness. This action was authorized by Public Law 95-625, the National Parks and Recreation Act of 1978. On October 28, 1988, Congress passed legislation (Public Law 100- 541, 102 Stat. 2720) that enlarged the park by 10,123 acres. The new land includes gypsum and quartzose dunes in an area west of and adjacent to the park boundary. All of the land identified in the 1988 legislation has been deeded to the National Park Service.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Some Effects of Fire on Shrubs and Succulents in a Chihuahuan Desert Community in the Franklin Mountains, El Paso County, Texas Richard D
    No. 3 January 1987 Contributed Papers of the SECOND SYMPOSIUM ON RESOURCES OF THE CHIHUAHUAN DESERT REGION United States and Mexico —BOTANICAL BIOLOGY— A. Michael Powell, Editor Some Effects of Fire on Shrubs and Succulents in a Chihuahuan Desert Community in the Franklin Mountains, El Paso County, Texas Richard D. Worthington and Rafael D. Corral THE CHIHUAHUAN DESERT RESEARCH INSTITUTE (CDRI) is a nonprofit scientific and educational organization. Its purpose is the collection and dissemination of information pertaining to the Chihuahuan Desert Region of the United States and Mexico. Memberships are available. Annual dues: Individual, $15; Student, $10; Family and Institutional, $25. The Chihuahuan Desert Research Institute publishes the semiannual magazine Chihuahuan Desert Discovery, which is free to members. Nonmembers and members receive our semiannual bulletin Chihuahuan Desert NewsBriefs. Papers in this series were presented during the Second Symposium on the Resources of the Chihuahuan Desert: United States and Mexico, at Sul Ross State University, Alpine, Texas, on October 20—21, 1983, and have been subjected to peer review. Contributed Papers of the SECOND SYMPOSIUM ON RESOURCES OF THE CHIHUAHUAN DESERT: United States and Mexico is a series by the Chihuahuan Desert Research Institute, Box 1334, Alpine,; Texas 79831; 915—837-8370. Copyright © 1986 by the Chihuahuan Desert Research Institute SOME EFFECTS OF FIRE ON SHRUBS AND SUCCULENTS IN A CHIHUAHUAN DESERT COMMUNITY IN THE FRANKLIN MOUNTAINS, EL PASO COUNTY, TEXAS RICHARD D. WORTHINGTON AND RAFAEL D. CORRAL, DEPARTMENT OF BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT EL PASO, EL PASO, TEXAS 79968 ABSTRACT.--On 15 July 1981, a fire burned about 30 ha of Chihua— huan desertscrub community in the Franklin Mountains, El Paso County, Texas.
    [Show full text]
  • Black Elk Peak Mobile Scanning Customers & Services Definitive Elevation Bringing the Goods TRUE ELEVATION BLACK ELK PEAK » JERRY PENRY, PS
    MAY 2017 AROUND THE BEND Survey Economics Black Elk Peak Mobile Scanning Customers & services Definitive elevation Bringing the goods TRUE ELEVATION BLACK ELK PEAK » JERRY PENRY, PS Displayed with permission • The American Surveyor • May 2017 • Copyright 2017 Cheves Media • www.Amerisurv.com lack Elk Peak, located in the Black Hills region of South Dakota, is the state’s highest natural point. It is frequently referred to as the highest summit in the United States east of the Rocky BMountains. Two other peaks, Guadalupe Peak in Texas and Sierra Blanca Peak in New Mexico, are higher and also east of the Continental Divide, but they are P. Tuttle used a Green’s mercury barometer, one of the considered south of the Rockies. best instruments of the time to determine elevations on The famed Black Elk Peak was known as Harney high peaks. Tuttle coordinated his measurements with Peak as early as 1855 in honor of General William S. simultaneous readings at the Union Pacific Railroad Harney. This designation lasted for more than 160 depot in Cheyenne, Wyo. The difference between the two years, but the peak was renamed Black Elk Peak on barometer readings, when added to the known sea level August 11, 2016, by the U. S. Board of Geographic elevation at Cheyenne, resulted in elevations of 7369.4’ Names to honor medicine man Black Elk of the Oglala and 7368.4’, varying greatly from the 9700’ elevation Lakota (Sioux). The two names are synonymously used previously obtained by Ludlow. in this article as the same peak. The elevation results of the Newton-Jenney The first attempt to accurately measure the elevation of Expedition were not published until 1880 due to the Black Elk Peak was in 1874 during the Custer Expedition.
    [Show full text]
  • Encounters with the Early Highpointers by Charles
    SOME CLOSE (AND NOT SO CLOSE) ENCOUNTERS WITH THE EARLY HIGHPOINTERS BY CHARLES FERIS Many stories can be told of how we got our first inspiration to pursue this hobby of ours, this highpointing. We’ve been inspired in a hundred ways; mine arose during a period of boredom, while in college. Seeking something other than study, I took out a Rand McNally road atlas, and looked at a map of my native state of Illinois, noting the little red dot in the northwest corner of the state. Wow, something neat to do. So while the other kids were off to Florida, off to Charles Mound I went during spring break 1961. Then it hit me; I had already done Mt. Whitney the year before, so why not do all the states. Now I was really excited. The next few years saw me collecting 13 more highpoints in the Midwest and southeast. I went my merry way, never realizing that others might be crazy enough to be pursuing the very same project. At this point I was not aware of the tiny fraternity of early highpointers who were already years before me. I had no idea of the remarkable people I was about to meet. Then in August 1965 a Sierra Club friend of mine in Chicago told me about C. Rowland Stebbins. I had found a kindred soul, one who had already completed the 48. I phoned him immediately. Soon my wife and I were off on the four hour drive to Lansing, Michigan. We arrived to an expansive mansion on Moore’s River Drive atop a bluff overlooking the Grand River.
    [Show full text]
  • Arrowhead • Fall 2008 1 Arrowhead Fall 2008 • Vol
    Arrowhead • Fall 2008 1 Arrowhead Fall 2008 • Vol. 15 • No. 4 The Newsletter of the Employees & Alumni Association of the National Park Service Published By Eastern National FROM THE DIRECTOR National Parks Second Century or more than Fa half-century, Commission Established folk singers have been repeating the Old Testament PS Director Mary A. Bomar has experts, park managers and the general conservationists, academics, business lead- advice: “To every Nhailed the establishment of the public over the course of their 12-month ers, policy experts and retired NPS execu- thing there is a National Parks Second Century Commis- effort, culminating in a report with rec- tives. The commission is led by former season.” This is a sion, a nonpartisan citizens group that will ommendations in the fall of 2009. senators Baker and Johnston. season of change provide recommendations for the future Former United States senators Howard “As the National Park Service looks and a season of celebration. of the National Park System. The com- H. Baker, Jr. (R-Tenn.) and J. Bennett ahead to our centennial in 2016,” said Most of the world’s religions rec- mission first met in August at Santa Johnston, Jr. (D-La.) announced the for- Director Bomar, “we appreciate that ognize the lengthening days that Monica Mountains NRA and will meet in mation of the National Parks Second public-spirited citizens step forward to follow the winter solstice as a time four additional national parks by June of Century Commission on Aug. 12. The help chart the course of our parks for of hope and possibility.
    [Show full text]
  • Mosaic of New Mexico's Scenery, Rocks, and History
    Mosaic of New Mexico's Scenery, Rocks, and History SCENIC TRIPS TO THE GEOLOGIC PAST NO. 8 Scenic Trips to the Geologic Past Series: No. 1—SANTA FE, NEW MEXICO No. 2—TAOS—RED RIVER—EAGLE NEST, NEW MEXICO, CIRCLE DRIVE No. 3—ROSWELL—CAPITAN—RUIDOSO AND BOTTOMLESS LAKES STATE PARK, NEW MEXICO No. 4—SOUTHERN ZUNI MOUNTAINS, NEW MEXICO No. 5—SILVER CITY—SANTA RITA—HURLEY, NEW MEXICO No. 6—TRAIL GUIDE TO THE UPPER PECOS, NEW MEXICO No. 7—HIGH PLAINS NORTHEASTERN NEW MEXICO, RATON- CAPULIN MOUNTAIN—CLAYTON No. 8—MOSlAC OF NEW MEXICO'S SCENERY, ROCKS, AND HISTORY No. 9—ALBUQUERQUE—ITS MOUNTAINS, VALLEYS, WATER, AND VOLCANOES No. 10—SOUTHWESTERN NEW MEXICO No. 11—CUMBRE,S AND TOLTEC SCENIC RAILROAD C O V E R : REDONDO PEAK, FROM JEMEZ CANYON (Forest Service, U.S.D.A., by John Whiteside) Mosaic of New Mexico's Scenery, Rocks, and History (Forest Service, U.S.D.A., by Robert W . Talbott) WHITEWATER CANYON NEAR GLENWOOD SCENIC TRIPS TO THE GEOLOGIC PAST NO. 8 Mosaic of New Mexico's Scenery, Rocks, a n d History edited by PAIGE W. CHRISTIANSEN and FRANK E. KOTTLOWSKI NEW MEXICO BUREAU OF MINES AND MINERAL RESOURCES 1972 NEW MEXICO INSTITUTE OF MINING & TECHNOLOGY STIRLING A. COLGATE, President NEW MEXICO BUREAU OF MINES & MINERAL RESOURCES FRANK E. KOTTLOWSKI, Director BOARD OF REGENTS Ex Officio Bruce King, Governor of New Mexico Leonard DeLayo, Superintendent of Public Instruction Appointed William G. Abbott, President, 1961-1979, Hobbs George A. Cowan, 1972-1975, Los Alamos Dave Rice, 1972-1977, Carlsbad Steve Torres, 1967-1979, Socorro James R.
    [Show full text]
  • Promise Beheld and the Limits of Place
    Promise Beheld and the Limits of Place A Historic Resource Study of Carlsbad Caverns and Guadalupe Mountains National Parks and the Surrounding Areas By Hal K. Rothman Daniel Holder, Research Associate National Park Service, Southwest Regional Office Series Number Acknowledgments This book would not be possible without the full cooperation of the men and women working for the National Park Service, starting with the superintendents of the two parks, Frank Deckert at Carlsbad Caverns National Park and Larry Henderson at Guadalupe Mountains National Park. One of the true joys of writing about the park system is meeting the professionals who interpret, protect and preserve the nation’s treasures. Just as important are the librarians, archivists and researchers who assisted us at libraries in several states. There are too many to mention individuals, so all we can say is thank you to all those people who guided us through the catalogs, pulled books and documents for us, and filed them back away after we left. One individual who deserves special mention is Jed Howard of Carlsbad, who provided local insight into the area’s national parks. Through his position with the Southeastern New Mexico Historical Society, he supplied many of the photographs in this book. We sincerely appreciate all of his help. And finally, this book is the product of many sacrifices on the part of our families. This book is dedicated to LauraLee and Lucille, who gave us the time to write it, and Talia, Brent, and Megan, who provide the reasons for writing. Hal Rothman Dan Holder September 1998 i Executive Summary Located on the great Permian Uplift, the Guadalupe Mountains and Carlsbad Caverns national parks area is rich in prehistory and history.
    [Show full text]
  • Plan for the Recovery of Desert Bighorn Sheep in New Mexico 2003-2013
    PLAN FOR THE RECOVERY OF DESERT BIGHORN SHEEP IN NEW MEXICO 2003-2013 New Mexico Department of Game and Fish August 2003 Executive Summary Desert bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis mexicana) were once prolific in New Mexico, occupying most arid mountain ranges in the southern part of the state. Over-hunting, and disease transmission from livestock are 2 primary reasons for the dramatic decline in bighorn sheep numbers throughout the west during the early 1900s. In 1980, desert bighorn were placed on New Mexico’s endangered species list. From 1992-2003, approximately 25% of bighorn were radiocollared to learn causes of mortality driving this species towards extinction. Approximately 85% of all known-cause non-hunter killed radiocollared individuals have been killed by mountain lions. Despite the lack of a native ungulate prey base in desert bighorn range, mountain lion populations remain high, leading to the hypothesis that mountain lions are subsidized predators feeding on exotic ungulates, including cattle. Lack of fine fuels from cattle grazing have resulted in a lack of fire on the landscape. This has lead to increased woody vegetation which inhibits bighorn’s ability to detect and escape from predators. Bighorn numbers in spring 2003 in New Mexico totaled 213 in the wild, and 91 at the Red Rock captive breeding facility. This is in spite of releasing 266 bighorn from Red Rock and 30 bighorn from Arizona between 1979 and 2002. Several existing herds of desert bighorn likely need an augmentation to prevent them from going extinct. The presence of domestic sheep and Barbary sheep, which pose risks to bighorn from fatal disease transmission and aggression, respectively, preclude reintroduction onto many unoccupied mountain ranges.
    [Show full text]
  • Climbing America's
    batical leave in Scandinavia, I finally reached the 5895m summit of Africa’s high- est mountain. In 1986, the year after I climbed Kilimanjaro, Dick Bass, Frank Wells, and Rick Ridgeway published Seven Summits, an account of Bass and Wells’ attempt to climb the highest peak on each of the world’s seven continents. I bought their book and devoured it. Inspired by it, I devised my own climbing goal—to climb at least ‘Three-and-a-Half Summits’: namely, at least three of the six highest of the Seven Summits plus Australia’s Mt Kosciuszko, which is a mere 2228m above sea level (i.e., less than half the height of Antarctica’s Vinson Massif, the sixth-lowest of the Seven Summits), and Kosciuszko can therefore, as a Kiwi I quipped, really only be regarded as a half-summit. I made reasonably quick progress towards achieving my goal. In August 1994, I climbed Russia’s Mt Elbrus, 5642m, the highest mountain in Europe. In December the same year, I summited 6962m-high Cerro Aconcagua in Argentina, the highest mountain in South America (which I like to tell people is ‘the highest mountain in the world outside Asia,’ and then hope their geography is so weak that they don’t realise how huge an exclusion clause those two words, ‘outside Asia’, are). I then decided to have a crack at climbing Denali, and on 6 July 1997 stood proudly on the 6194m-high summit of North America’s high- est peak and held up a t-shirt from Victoria University (which is where I taught political science for many years).
    [Show full text]
  • Birds of the Guadalupe Mountain Region of Western Texas
    Number 8 August 20, 1940 OCCASIONAL PAPERS OF THE MUSEUM OF ZOOLOGY LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY Baton Rouge, La. Louisiana State University Press BIRDS OF THE GUADALUPE MOUNTAIN REGION OF WESTERN TEXAS' By Thomas D. Burleigh and George H. Lowery, Jr. Rising from the desert floor amid Mesquite, cactus, and Grease Bush, Guadalupe Peak has the distinction of being the highest point in the big state of Texas — reaching an altitude of 8758 feet above sea level. There, among its high ridges and escarpments in the heart of a Texas desert plain, one finds a beautiful Canadian Transition Zone forest. Dense stands of conifers — Western Yellow Pine and Douglas Fir— along with oaks and maples, combine to make the area a biotic community quite unlike the remainder of Texas. One would judge that such an area would have long since attracted ornithologists. In searching for new Texas birds, certainly the highest point in the state would merit investigation. To the contrary, however, so far as we can determine, only three ornithologists have collected and observed birds there prior to the present study, and then only for an aggregate of sixteen days during late summer. During May, 1939, we collected birds in several localities in the Trans-Pecos area of western Texas. Proceeding from Van Horn, osten­ sibly for El Paso, we made a brief stop during the afternoon of May 17 in Pine Springs Canyon of the Guadalupe range. Even superficial 1 The present work represents a cooperative study undertaken jointly by the Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S. Department of the Interior, and the Museum of Zoology of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College.
    [Show full text]
  • Locsec News by Sandy Halby
    The Newsletter of Plains and Peaks Mensa, Southern Colorado Volume 28, Issue 11 http://www.plainsandpeaks.us.mensa.org/ DECEMBER 2011 LocSec News by Sandy Halby Hello! All is normal at the Halbys except we’ve Coming up in December – our annual Holiday Brian, Wetzel, Ann, Ginny, Kathie, Deborah, made some adjustments to our “pack.” In mid- Party at the Stagecoach Inn in Manitou Springs. Gary, Tony, Anthony, David, Gary, Steve, Jim, October, we adopted another dog – a New- This is our biggest event of the year and I hope RC, Gia, Kari, Lou, Daniel, Jennie-Jo, Wayne, foundland named Otis. He’s black and not as you can join me, Mike and a bunch of fellow Eryn and anybody I might have missed … and big as Kody, but just as sweet. Otis was a little Mensans for an evening of camaraderie, fun, hugs to all of you… my Mensa friends. nervous at first about all these other dogs, but as and holiday cheer! Be sure to RSVP by the 28th dogs are wont to do, they’re all working it out. of November! From Mike and me: Merry Christmas and Chance is teaching Otis to play and Brinkley is Happy New Year! Hope to see YOU soon at a teaching him how to beg and get on the beds! Then, in January, some of usual events like Give Plains & Peaks Mensa event!! Having four large dogs now leaves no room in In to Beer Pressure, Trivia Night, Mix & Mingle the kitchen during feeding time and when they and Kimball’s.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrobasaluminite and Aluminite in Caves of the Guadalupe Mountains, New Mexico
    Victor J. Polyak and Paula Provencio-Hydrobasaluminite and Aluminite in Caves of the Guadalupe Mountains, New Mexico. Journal of Cave and Karst Studies 60(1): 51-57. HYDROBASALUMINITE AND ALUMINITE IN CAVES OF THE GUADALUPE MOUNTAINS, NEW MEXICO VICTOR J. POLYAK Department of Geosciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas 79409-1053 USA PAULA PROVENCIO Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87185 USA Hydrobasaluminite, like alunite and natroalunite, has formed as a by-product of the H2S-H2SO4 speleo- genesis of Cottonwood Cave located in the Guadalupe Mountains of New Mexico. This mineral is found as the major component of white pockets in the dolostone bedrock where clay-rich seams containing kaolinite, dickite, and illite have altered during speleogenesis to hydrobasaluminite, amorphous silica, alunite, and hydrated halloysite (endellite). Gibbsite and amorphous silica are associated with the hydrobasaluminite in a small room of Cottonwood Cave. Opalline sediment on the floor of this room accumulated as the cave passage evolved. Jarosite, in trace amounts, occurs in association with the opalline sediment and most likely has the same origin as hydrobasaluminite and alunite. The hydrobasa- luminite was found to be unstable at 25ºC and 50% RH, converting to basaluminite in a few hours. Basaluminite was not detected in the cave samples. Aluminite has precipitated as a secondary mineral in the same small room where hydrobasaluminite occurs. It comprises a white to bluish-white, pasty to powdery moonmilk coating on the cave walls. The bedrock pockets containing hydrobasaluminite provide the ingredients from which aluminite moonmilk has formed. It appears that recent cave waters have removed alumina and sulfate from the bedrock pock- et minerals and have deposited aluminite and gypsum along the cave wall.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Linkchapter
    Index [Italic page numbers indicate major references] Abajo Mountains, 382, 388 Amargosa River, 285, 309, 311, 322, Arkansas River, 443, 456, 461, 515, Abort Lake, 283 337, 341, 342 516, 521, 540, 541, 550, 556, Abies, 21, 25 Amarillo, Texas, 482 559, 560, 561 Abra, 587 Amarillo-Wichita uplift, 504, 507, Arkansas River valley, 512, 531, 540 Absaroka Range, 409 508 Arlington volcanic field, 358 Acer, 21, 23, 24 Amasas Back, 387 Aromas dune field, 181 Acoma-Zuni scction, 374, 379, 391 Ambrose tenace, 522, 523 Aromas Red Sand, 180 stream evolution patterns, 391 Ambrosia, 21, 24 Arroyo Colorado, 395 Aden Crater, 368 American Falls Lava Beds, 275, 276 Arroyo Seco unit, 176 Afton Canyon, 334, 341 American Falls Reservoir, 275, 276 Artemisia, 21, 24 Afton interglacial age, 29 American River, 36, 165, 173 Ascension Parish, Louisana, 567 aggradation, 167, 176, 182, 226, 237, amino acid ash, 81, 118, 134, 244, 430 323, 336, 355, 357, 390, 413, geochronology, 65, 68 basaltic, 85 443, 451, 552, 613 ratios, 65 beds, 127,129 glaciofluvial, 423 aminostratigraphy, 66 clays, 451 Piedmont, 345 Amity area, 162 clouds, 95 aggregate, 181 Anadara, 587 flows, 75, 121 discharge, 277 Anastasia Formation, 602, 642, 647 layer, 10, 117 Agua Fria Peak area, 489 Anastasia Island, 602 rhyolitic, 170 Agua Fria River, 357 Anchor Silt, 188, 198, 199 volcanic, 54, 85, 98, 117, 129, Airport bench, 421, 423 Anderson coal, 448 243, 276, 295, 396, 409, 412, Alabama coastal plain, 594 Anderson Pond, 617, 618 509, 520 Alamosa Basin, 366 andesite, 75, 80, 489 Ash Flat, 364 Alamosa
    [Show full text]