Скачать С Сайта Rrrcn (Pdf 13
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Potential Influence of World Heritage Sites Over the Global Citizenship Education in the Republic of Kazakhstan
POTENTIAL INFLUENCE OF WORLD HERITAGE SITES OVER THE GLOBAL CITIZENSHIP EDUCATION IN THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN Manual for teachers of general secondary and high school education programmes National World Heritage Committee under the jurisdiction of the National Commission of the Republic of Kazakhstan for UNESCO and ISESCO Almaty 2017 UDC 371.214 BBC 74.202 P 64 P 64 «Potential Influence of World Heritage Sites over the Global Citizenship Education in the Republic of Kazakhstan. Manual for teachers of general secondary and high school education programmes. K.M. Baipakov, D.A. Voyakin, M.E. Dikan, M.N. Massanov, E.A. Sarsenova, Z.N. Shaigozova. – Almaty: APCEIU, NWHC. 2017. Content ISBN 978-601-06-4672-8 Present publication is a manual for teachers for of general secondary and high school education programmes of the Republic of Kazakhstan and Central Asia. It aims to raise awareness of teachers and students on the issue of local cultural and natural heritage, and Global Citizenship Education 10 Cooperation between Kazakhstan and UNESCO Concept, and to introduce World Heritage and Global Citizenship Education topics to the general Baipakov K.M., Voyakin D.A., Massanov M.N. secondary and high school education programmes of Kazakhstan. For Kazakhstan and Central Asian, it is a first attempt to understand the potential contribution of UNESCO World Heritage Sites 28 World Heritage of Kazakhstan to the Global Citizenship Education. Baipakov K.M., Voyakin D.A., Massanov M.N. Disclaimer Global Citizenship Education While every effort have been made to ensure that the information contained herein is correct at 72 the time of publication, the authors shall not be held liable for any errors, omissions, inaccuracies Dikan M.E., Massanov M.N., Sarsenova E.A. -
Ramsar Sites in Order of Addition to the Ramsar List of Wetlands of International Importance
Ramsar sites in order of addition to the Ramsar List of Wetlands of International Importance RS# Country Site Name Desig’n Date 1 Australia Cobourg Peninsula 8-May-74 2 Finland Aspskär 28-May-74 3 Finland Söderskär and Långören 28-May-74 4 Finland Björkör and Lågskär 28-May-74 5 Finland Signilskär 28-May-74 6 Finland Valassaaret and Björkögrunden 28-May-74 7 Finland Krunnit 28-May-74 8 Finland Ruskis 28-May-74 9 Finland Viikki 28-May-74 10 Finland Suomujärvi - Patvinsuo 28-May-74 11 Finland Martimoaapa - Lumiaapa 28-May-74 12 Finland Koitilaiskaira 28-May-74 13 Norway Åkersvika 9-Jul-74 14 Sweden Falsterbo - Foteviken 5-Dec-74 15 Sweden Klingavälsån - Krankesjön 5-Dec-74 16 Sweden Helgeån 5-Dec-74 17 Sweden Ottenby 5-Dec-74 18 Sweden Öland, eastern coastal areas 5-Dec-74 19 Sweden Getterön 5-Dec-74 20 Sweden Store Mosse and Kävsjön 5-Dec-74 21 Sweden Gotland, east coast 5-Dec-74 22 Sweden Hornborgasjön 5-Dec-74 23 Sweden Tåkern 5-Dec-74 24 Sweden Kvismaren 5-Dec-74 25 Sweden Hjälstaviken 5-Dec-74 26 Sweden Ånnsjön 5-Dec-74 27 Sweden Gammelstadsviken 5-Dec-74 28 Sweden Persöfjärden 5-Dec-74 29 Sweden Tärnasjön 5-Dec-74 30 Sweden Tjålmejaure - Laisdalen 5-Dec-74 31 Sweden Laidaure 5-Dec-74 32 Sweden Sjaunja 5-Dec-74 33 Sweden Tavvavuoma 5-Dec-74 34 South Africa De Hoop Vlei 12-Mar-75 35 South Africa Barberspan 12-Mar-75 36 Iran, I. R. -
2007 UNEP-WCMC Global List of Transboundary Protected Areas Lysenko I., Besançon C., Savy C
2007 UNEP-WCMC Global List of Transboundary Protected Areas Lysenko I., Besançon C., Savy C. No TBPA Name Country Protected Areas Sitecode Category PA Size, km 2 TBPA Area, km 2 Ellesmere/Greenland 1 Canada Quttinirpaaq 300093 II 38148.00 Transboundary Complex Greenland Hochstetter Forland 67910 RAMSAR 1848.20 Kilen 67911 RAMSAR 512.80 North-East Greenland 2065 MAB-BR 972000.00 North-East Greenland 650 II 972000.00 1,008,470.17 2 Canada Ivvavik 100672 II 10170.00 Old Crow Flats 101594 IV 7697.47 Vuntut 100673 II 4400.00 United States Arctic 2904 IV 72843.42 Arctic 35361 Ia 32374.98 Yukon Flats 10543 IV 34925.13 146,824.27 Alaska-Yukon-British Columbia 3 Canada Atlin 4178 II 2326.95 Borderlands Atlin 65094 II 384.45 Chilkoot Trail Nhp 167269 Unset 122.65 Kluane 612 II 22015.00 Kluane Wildlife 18707 VI 6450.00 Kluane/Wrangell-St Elias/Glacier Bay/Tatshenshini-Alsek 12200 WHC 31595.00 Tatshenshini-Alsek 67406 Ib 9470.26 United States Admiralty Island 21243 Ib 3803.76 Chilkat 68395 II 24.46 Chilkat Bald Eagle 68396 II 198.38 Glacier Bay 1010 II 13045.50 Glacier Bay 22485 V 233.85 Glacier Bay 35382 Ib 10784.27 Glacier Bay-Admiralty Island Biosphere Reserve 11591 MAB-BR 15150.15 Kluane/Wrangell-St Elias/Glacier Bay/Tatshenshini-Alsek 2018 WHC 66796.48 Kootznoowoo 101220 Ib 3868.24 Malaspina Glacier 21555 III 3878.40 Mendenhall River 306286 Unset 14.57 Misty Fiords 21247 Ib 8675.10 Misty Fjords 13041 IV 4622.75 Point Bridge 68394 II 11.64 Russell Fiord 21249 Ib 1411.15 Stikine-LeConte 21252 Ib 1816.75 Tetlin 2956 IV 2833.07 Tongass 13038 VI 67404.09 Global List of Transboundary Protected Areas ©2007 UNEP-WCMC 1 of 78 No TBPA Name Country Protected Areas Sitecode Category PA Size, km 2 TBPA Area, km 2 Tracy Arm-Fords Terror 21254 Ib 2643.43 Wrangell-St Elias 1005 II 33820.14 Wrangell-St Elias 35387 Ib 36740.24 Wrangell-St. -
Diversity and Ecology of Periphytonic Algae in the Arys River Basin, Kazakhstan
Journal of Ecology & Natural Resources ISSN: 2578-4994 Diversity and Ecology of Periphytonic Algae in the Arys River Basin, Kazakhstan 1 2 Barinova SS *, Krupa EG Research Article 1Institute of Evolution, University of Haifa, Israel Volume 1 Issue 1 2 Republican State Enterprise on the Right of Economic Use "Institute of Zoology", Received Date: June 27, 2017 Ministry of Education and Science, Science Committee, Republic of Kazakhstan Published Date: July 15, 2017 DOI: 10.23880/jenr-16000106 *Corresponding author: Barinova SS, Institute of Evolution, University of Haifa, Mount Carmel, 199 Abba Khoushi Ave., Haifa 3498838, Israel, E-mail: [email protected] Abstract No one information about algal community diversity from the Arys River basin was before this study. The first data about algal and cyanobacteria species diversity was represented for the Arys River basin and compared it to freshwater algae patterns of the related mountain regions. Altogether 82 species were found in 28 samples of phytoperiphyton on 13 sampling stations of the Arys River and its tributaries. Diatoms prevail in studied algal flora. Bioindication characterize the Arys River waters as temperate, moderately oxygenated, fresh, neutral water affected by a low to moderate level of organic pollution, Class II-III of water quality. The pattern of algae and cyanobacteria diversity distribution depends on altitude and local climatic and environmental conditions. Bacillariophyta species was richest in high mountain habitats, green algae, cyanobacteria and charophytes avoid high mountain habitats and have negative correlation with altitude. These results can be used as indicator of environmental changes in the mountainous areas. Three floristic groups were recognized in the studied river communities corresponding to the upper, middle and lower parts of the watershed. -
Geography, M.V
RUSSIAN GEOGRAPHICAL SOCIETY FACULTY OF GEOGRAPHY, M.V. LOMONOSOV MOSCOW STATE UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE OF GEOGRAPHY, RUSSIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES No. 01 [v. 04] 2011 GEOGRAPHY ENVIRONMENT SUSTAINABILITY ggi111.inddi111.indd 1 003.08.20113.08.2011 114:38:054:38:05 EDITORIAL BOARD EDITORS-IN-CHIEF: Kasimov Nikolay S. Kotlyakov Vladimir M. Vandermotten Christian M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State Russian Academy of Sciences Université Libre de Bruxelles 01|2011 University, Faculty of Geography Institute of Geography Belgique Russia Russia 2 GES Tikunov Vladimir S. (Secretary-General) Kroonenberg Salomon, M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Delft University of Technology Faculty of Geography, Russia. Department of Applied Earth Sciences, Babaev Agadzhan G. The Netherlands Turkmenistan Academy of Sciences, O’Loughlin John Institute of deserts, Turkmenistan University of Colorado at Boulder, Baklanov Petr Ya. Institute of Behavioral Sciences, USA Russian Academy of Sciences, Malkhazova Svetlana M. Pacific Institute of Geography, Russia M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Baume Otfried, Faculty of Geography, Russia Ludwig Maximilians Universitat Munchen, Mamedov Ramiz Institut fur Geographie, Germany Baku State University, Chalkley Brian Faculty of Geography, Azerbaijan University of Plymouth, UK Mironenko Nikolay S. Dmitriev Vasily V. M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Sankt-Petersburg State University, Faculty of Faculty of Geography, Russia. Geography and Geoecology, Russia Palacio-Prieto Jose Dobrolubov Sergey A. National Autonomous University of Mexico, M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Institute of Geography, Mexico Faculty of Geography, Russia Palagiano Cosimo, D’yakonov Kirill N. Universita degli Studi di Roma “La Sapienza”, M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Instituto di Geografia, Italy Faculty of Geography, Russia Richling Andrzej Gritsay Olga V. -
“Mongolia's Network of Managed Resource
GOVERNMENT OF MINISTRY OF MONGOLIA ENVIRONMENT AND TOURISM “MONGOLIA’S NETWORK OF MANAGED RESOURCE PROTECTED AREAS” МОN/13/303 PROJECT THE PROJECT GOAL: The goal is to ensure integrity of Mongolia’s diverse ecosystems to secure viability of nation’s globally significant biodiversity. IMPLEMENTING PARTNERS: • Ministry of the Environment and Tourism THE PROJECT OBJECTIVE: • United Nations Development Program The project objective is to catalyze strategic expansion of Mongolia’s FUNDING: protected areas system through estab- • Global Environmental Facility – 1,309,091 $ lishment of a network of community • UN Development Program – 200,000 $ conservation areas covering • Ministry of the Environment and Tourism -500,000 $ (in-kind) under-represented terrestrial ecosystems. PROGRAMME PERIOD: TOTAL BUDGET: 2013-2018 1,509,091 $ PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION SITES: 1. “Gulzat” LPA (Uvs aimag, Bukhmurun soums) 203,316 ha 2. “Khavtgar” LPA (Batshireet soum of Khentii aimag) 104,900 ha 3. “Tumenkhan-shalz” LPA (Tsgaaan ovoo, Bayan-uul soums of Dornod aimag, and Norovlin soum of Khentii aimag) 374,499 ha Expanded area under local protection by 600 thousand ha: ACHIEVEMENTS AND OUTPUTS: Expanded area under local protection by about 600.0 thousand hectare and created ecological corridor areas Created under local protection, the ecological corridors/ connectivity support wildlife movement between the state and local pro- 1 tected areas in west and east regions. These are а. 433,9 thousand ha б. 278.9 thousand ha Total of 433,9 thousand ha area, a migration and calv- Argali sheep migration and distribution area of ing land of gazelle located between Tosonkhulstai NR 284.4 thousand ha, that connects Tsagaan shuvuut and Onon Balj NP in Bayan-uul, Tsagaan ovoo and Nor- and Turgen mountain SPAs in Sagil and Buhmurun ovlin soums of Dornod and Khenti aimags; soums of Uvs aimag. -
RCN #33 21/8/03 13:57 Page 1
RCN #33 21/8/03 13:57 Page 1 No. 33 Summer 2003 Special issue: The Transformation of Protected Areas in Russia A Ten-Year Review PROMOTING BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION IN RUSSIA AND THROUGHOUT NORTHERN EURASIA RCN #33 21/8/03 13:57 Page 2 CONTENTS CONTENTS Voice from the Wild (Letter from the Editors)......................................1 Ten Years of Teaching and Learning in Bolshaya Kokshaga Zapovednik ...............................................................24 BY WAY OF AN INTRODUCTION The Formation of Regional Associations A Brief History of Modern Russian Nature Reserves..........................2 of Protected Areas........................................................................................................27 A Glossary of Russian Protected Areas...........................................................3 The Growth of Regional Nature Protection: A Case Study from the Orlovskaya Oblast ..............................................29 THE PAST TEN YEARS: Making Friends beyond Boundaries.............................................................30 TRENDS AND CASE STUDIES A Spotlight on Kerzhensky Zapovednik...................................................32 Geographic Development ........................................................................................5 Ecotourism in Protected Areas: Problems and Possibilities......34 Legal Developments in Nature Protection.................................................7 A LOOK TO THE FUTURE Financing Zapovedniks ...........................................................................................10 -
Kazakhstan and the Kyrgyz Republic: Almaty-Bishkek Regional Road Rehabilitation Project
ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK Independent Evaluation Department PROJECT PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT ON KAZAKHSTAN AND THE KYRGYZ REPUBLIC: ALMATY-BISHKEK REGIONAL ROAD REHABILITATION PROJECT In this electronic file, the report is followed by Management’s response, and the Board of Directors’ Development Effectiveness Committee (DEC) Chair’s summary of a discussion of the report by DEC. Performance Evaluation Report Project Numbers: 29568 and 32463 Loan Numbers: 1774 and 1775 Project Performance Evaluation Report (Joint Report) March 2009 Kazakhstan and the Kyrgyz Republic: Almaty– Bishkek Regional Road Rehabilitation Project This joint evaluation report was prepared by the Independent Evaluation Department of the Asian Development Bank and the Evaluation Department of the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development. CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS Asian Development Bank Currency Unit (Kazakhstan) – tenge (T) At Appraisal At Project Completion At Operations Evaluation (August 2000) (October 2007) (August 2008) T1.00 = $0.0070 $0.0082 $0.0084 $1.00 = T142.400 T120.855 T119.680 Currency Unit (Kyrgyz Republic) – som (Som) At Appraisal At Project Completion At Operations Evaluation (August 2000) (October 2007) (August 2008) Som1.00 = $0.0208 $0.02895 $0.0289 $1.00 = Som47.990 Som34.540 Som34.560 European Bank for Reconstruction and Development Currency Unit (Kazakhstan) – tenge (KZT) At Appraisal (October 2000) $1 = €1.17 $1 = KZT (tenge)144 ABBREVIATIONS ADB – Asian Development Bank BME – benefit monitoring and evaluation CAREC – Central Asia Regional -
From Sacred Cow to Cash Cow Muller, Martin
From sacred cow to cash cow Muller, Martin License: Creative Commons: Attribution-NoDerivs (CC BY-ND) Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Citation for published version (Harvard): Müller, M 2014, 'From sacred cow to cash cow: the shifting political ecologies of protected areas in Russia', Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsgeographie, vol. 58, no. 2-3, pp. 127-143. Link to publication on Research at Birmingham portal General rights Unless a licence is specified above, all rights (including copyright and moral rights) in this document are retained by the authors and/or the copyright holders. The express permission of the copyright holder must be obtained for any use of this material other than for purposes permitted by law. •Users may freely distribute the URL that is used to identify this publication. •Users may download and/or print one copy of the publication from the University of Birmingham research portal for the purpose of private study or non-commercial research. •User may use extracts from the document in line with the concept of ‘fair dealing’ under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (?) •Users may not further distribute the material nor use it for the purposes of commercial gain. Where a licence is displayed above, please note the terms and conditions of the licence govern your use of this document. When citing, please reference the published version. Take down policy While the University of Birmingham exercises care and attention in making items available there are rare occasions when an item has been uploaded in error or has been deemed to be commercially or otherwise sensitive. -
Comparative Analysis of South Kazakhstan and the Republic of Belarus Water Resources
Central JSM Environmental Science & Ecology Bringing Excellence in Open Access Research Article *Corresponding author Akmaral Issayeva, Ecology and Biotechnology Institute, M. Auezov South Kazakhstan State University, 160012, Comparative Analysis of South Tauke khan avenue, 5, Shymkent, Kazakhstan, Tel: 7 -701- 242-62-68; Email Submitted: 03 September 2018 Kazakhstan and the Republic of Accepted: 29 October 2018 Published: 31 October 2018 Belarus Water Resources ISSN: 2333-7141 Copyright Akmaral Issayeva1*, Arystanbek Yeshibayev2, Svetlana Dubenok3, © 2018 Issayeva et al. Raisa Markevitch4 OPEN ACCESS 1Biotechnology and Ecology Institute, M. Auezov South Kazakhstan State University, Kazakhstan 2Shymkent University, Kazakhstan Keywords 3RUE «Central Research Institute for Complex use of Water Resources», Republic of • Water resources; Pollution; Toxic ingredients; Quality Belarus of water 4Department of Biotechnology and Bioecology, Belarusian State Technological University, Republic of Belarus Abstract This article presents the results of a comparative analysis of the water provision, water consumption, pollution sources, major pollutants and condition of water bodies in the South Kazakhstan region and the Republic of Belarus. The difference in the ecological status of the water bodies of Southern Kazakhstan and Belarus is justified both by the weather and climate regimes of the territories and by the level of sustainable development of industry. ABBREVIATIONS territory of Belarus, so it is interesting to compare the availability of water resources and their status of a separate region (South SKR: South Kazakhstan Region; SWK: State Water Cadastre; Kazakhstan region (SKR) and the Republic of Belarus. JSC: Joint Stock Company; YPM: Yuzhpolimetall; WTP: Wastewater Treatment Plant; BOC5: Biological Oxygen Consumption; WPI: The populations of Southern Kazakhstan and the Republic of Water Pollution Index; QC: Quality Class; CWQ: Characteristics Belarus - are comparable (8.4 and 9.5 million people respectively). -
Transboundary Wetlands: Exploring Formal Mechanisms for Cooperation
AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Zoe Rosenblum for the degree of Master of Science in Water Resources Policy and Management presented on December 15, 2020. Title: Transboundary Wetlands: Exploring Formal Mechanisms for Cooperation Abstract approved: ____________________________________________________ Susanne Schmeier Despite increased understanding of the benefits of wetlands, global wetland area continues to decrease. Wetlands are being lost at an alarming rate, and with them, biodiversity, floodwater storage, water purification, and countless other functions. There is little information available about mechanisms to manage transboundary wetlands. While the Ramsar Convention is one international mechanism for wetland governance, there are very few cases in which all riparian parties have jointly designated a Transboundary Ramsar Site. Most research on transboundary wetlands explores specific conflicts or management issues or argues for or against the Ramsar Convention as a legal tool to manage wetlands. However, little research explores institutions for managing transboundary wetlands. Furthermore, while there is much evidence that freshwater resources are a source of cooperation, there is emphasis on rivers and wetlands are largely absent from the discourse. This research employs document analysis, coding, and spatial analysis to explore how transboundary wetlands are managed. The products of this research are: a database of the world’s transboundary wetlands; an in-depth analysis of the management of the Wadden Sea, Okavango Delta, and -
Index to Geographical and Local Names1
279 INDEX TO GEOGRAPHICAL AND LOCAL NAMES1 Aarhus (Denmark) 13 Abago (Caucasian Nature Preserve: Gr. Caucasus: S European Russia) 212 Abava R. (W Latvia) 30 Abkhazia, Rep. (Georgia) 31 173 181 195 Åbo — see Turku Abruzzi Apennines — see Apennines Adana Prov. (Turkey) 181 Adzharia, Rep. (Georgia) 32 181 195 243 Adzharo-Imeretinskiy or Adzharo-Imeretian Rg. (Lesser Caucasus: Adzharia: Georgia) 173 Adzharo-Shavshetskiy or Adzharo-Shavshetian Rg. (Lesser Caucasus: Adzharia: Georgia) 173 Aegean Sea (arm of Mediterranean Sea betw. Greece and Turkey) 175 Aegypto (Lat., Nom. Aegyptus) — see Egypt Afghanistan 104 107 108 117 178 207 247 248 251 253 Africa 11 20 33 35 39 40 96 175 181 215 240 Agdash (Kura Depression: Azerbaijan) 181 Agri Prov. (Turkey) 181 243 Ajagus or Ajaguz (Lat.) — see Ayaguz Akhaltsikhe (Georgia) 118 Akmechet or Ak-Mechet (Gissar Rg.: Tajikistan) 248 Akmetschet (Lat.) — see Akmechet Aksu R. (Balkhash Basin: Dzungarskiy Alatau: Kazakhstan) 251 Aksu-Dzhabagly Nature Preserve (Chimkent Obl.: Kazakhstan) 13 Ak-Terek Forestland (N of Dzhalal-Abad: Kirghizia) 31 59 A-la Shan or Ho-lan Shan, Desert Reg. (Inner Mongolia: N China) — !:"T">\ 121 Alabino (Moscow Obl.: centr. European Russia) 30 Alagir (N Caucasus: S European Russia) 212 Alaska, State (USA) 95 135 143-145 155 156 218 219 Alatau — see Dzhungarskiy Alatau Alay (-skiy) Rg. (S Kirghizia) 249 Albania 124 131 173 177 198 244 Aldan (Yakutia: East Siberia) 31 205 Aldan R. (Yakutia: East Siberia) 124 160 164 177 187 196 201 205 206 209 213 228 Aldano-Uchurskiy Rg. (Yakutia: East Siberia) 200 Aldan(-skiy) Forest Farm (Yakutia: East Siberia) 13 Aldan(-skoye) High Plateau (Yakutia: East Siberia) 32 164 219 221 238 Aleutian(s) Is.