HR401-Xxx.Ps

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

HR401-Xxx.Ps 915 CONFERENCE TOTAL—WITH COMPARISONS The total new budget (obligational) authority for the fiscal year 2004 recommended by the Committee of Conference, with compari- sons to the fiscal year 2003 amount, the 2004 budget estimates, and the House and Senate bills for 2004 follow: [In thousands of dollars] New budget (obligational) authority, fiscal year 2003 ........................ $430,990,470 Budget estimates of new (obligational) authority, fiscal year 2004 469,697,348 House bill, fiscal year 2004 ................................................................... 478,406,936 Senate bill, fiscal year 2004 .................................................................. 473,552,979 Conference agreement, fiscal year 2004 .............................................. 480,345,954 Conference agreement compared with: New budget (obligational) authority, fiscal year 2003 ................ +49,355,484 Budget estimates of new (obligational) authority, fiscal year 2004 .............................................................................................. +10,648,606 House bill, fiscal year 2004 ............................................................ +1,939,018 Senate bill, fiscal year 2004 ........................................................... +6,792,975 DIVISION F—DEPARTMENTS OF TRANSPORTATION AND TREASURY, AND INDEPENDENT AGENCIES APPROPRIA- TIONS ACT, 2004 CONGRESSIONAL DIRECTIVES The conferees agree that Executive Branch propensities cannot substitute for Congress’s own statements concerning the best evi- dence of Congressional intentions; that is, the official reports of the Congress. The committee of conference approves report language included by the House (House Report 108–243) or the Senate (Sen- ate Report 108–146) that is not changed by the conference. The statement of the managers, while repeating some report language for emphasis, is not intended to negate the language referred to above unless expressly provided herein. TITLE I—DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY SALARIES AND EXPENSES The conference agreement provides $80,903,000 for the salaries and expenses of the office of the secretary instead of $94,077,000 as proposed by the House and $91,276,000 as proposed by the Sen- ate. Bill language is included that specifies amounts by office, con- sistent with actions in prior years, and limits transfers among each office to no more than 5 percent. The bill language specifies that any transfer greater than 5 percent shall be submitted for approval to the House and Senate Committees on Appropriations. Bill lan- guage, as proposed by both the House and the Senate, allows the Department to spend up to $60,000 for official reception and rep- resentation activities, and credits to the appropriation up to $2,500,000 in user fee receipts. The following table summarizes the appropriation for each of- fice: Immediate office of the Secretary ......................................................... $2,210,000 Immediate office of the Deputy Secretary ........................................... 700,000 Office of the General Counsel ............................................................... 15,403,000 VerDate jul 14 2003 07:32 Dec 02, 2003 Jkt 090637 PO 00000 Frm 00919 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6611 E:\HR\OC\HR401.XXX HR401 916 Under Secretary of Transportation for Policy ..................................... 12,312,000 Office of the Assistant Secretary for Budget and Programs .............. 8,536,000 Office of the Assistant Secretary for Governmental Affairs ............... 2,300,000 Office of the Assistant Secretary for Administration ......................... 24,612,000 Office of Public Affairs .......................................................................... 1,915,000 Executive Secretariat ............................................................................ 1,447,000 Board of Contract Appeals .................................................................... 700,000 Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization ................... 1,268,000 Office of the Chief Information Officer ................................................ 7,500,000 Office of Intelligence and Security ....................................................... 2,000,000 Implementation of Air Transportation Safety and System Sta- bilization Act for cargo carriers.—The conferees expect that the De- partment would administer funds made available under title I of the Air Transportation Safety and System Stabilization Act with- out discrimination among directly competitive air carriers and note that comparable percentages of the notional maximum amount of compensation payable under section 103(b)(2) of that Act provides a credible check on the Department’s allocation decisions. Further, the conferees expect that the Secretary will defer any final deter- mination on disputed claims until the Comptroller General’s review is completed, and would refer any remaining disputed claims to an administrative law judge upon an affected claimant’s request. In addition, the Department is directed to provide the report re- quested by the Senate. Congressional justification materials.—The conferees direct the office of the secretary to submit its congressional justification mate- rials in support of the individual offices of the offices of the sec- retary at the same level of detail provided in the congressional jus- tifications presented in fiscal year 2003, and to submit annual Con- gressional budget justifications for each modal administration to the House and Senate Committees on Appropriations on the date on which the President’s budget is delivered officially to Congress. Office of Intelligence and Security.—The conferees acknowledge the mission of this office has changed significantly since enactment of the Aviation and Transportation Security Act. Consequently, the conferees direct the Secretary to submit, not later than March 1, 2004, a report to the House and Senate Committees on Appropria- tions describing in detail the organization, mission, and respon- sibilities of this office, as well as a five year projection of staffing and budget resources. Outstanding reports.—The conference agreement continues the longstanding policy expressed in the Senate report directing the Of- fice of the Assistant Secretary for Budget and Programs to report quarterly on the status of all outstanding Congressional reports and reporting requirements, including the degree of delinquency of Congressionally requested reports and an estimated date for deliv- ery. The conferees note that not only are many reports themselves late, but in fiscal year 2003, the quarterly compilation described herein was itself only submitted in one of four quarters required. The conferees will work with the office of the secretary to ensure that this situation improves in the coming year. Cyber threat intelligence.—The conferees recognize the impor- tance of utilizing proactive cyber threat intelligence to protect the critical infrastructure assets of the department. The conferees en- courage the department to deploy a performance-based cyber threat intelligence service that contains the aggregation of known tech- VerDate jul 14 2003 07:32 Dec 02, 2003 Jkt 090637 PO 00000 Frm 00920 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6601 E:\HR\OC\HR401.XXX HR401 917 nical vulnerabilities, original technical vulnerability research, geo- political cyber threat analysis, malicious code research and pre- dictive cyber threat analysis. The conferees also recognize that many serious cyber attacks originate from non-English-speaking re- gions of the world. As such, the cyber threat intelligence services described above must include a demonstrated ability to collect cyber threat intelligence in multiple languages, including Arabic. Grant notifications to Congress.—The conferees agree that the report, directed by the Senate, submitting options for providing grant notifications in electronic format should be submitted to the House and Senate Committees on Appropriations not later than December 31, 2003. OFFICE OF CIVIL RIGHTS The conference agreement provides $8,569,000 for the office of civil rights as proposed by the House and the Senate. TRANSPORTATION PLANNING, RESEARCH, AND DEVELOPMENT The conference agreement provides $20,864,000 for transpor- tation planning, research, and development instead of $8,336,000 as proposed by the House and $15,836,000 as proposed by the Sen- ate. Adjustments to the budget request are as follows: Conference agreement Aviation and international policy studies ............................................ ¥$2,472,000 Circumpolar infrastructure task force, Artic Council and Northern Forum, AK .......................................................................................... 1,000,000 Center for Integrated Transportation & Traffic Systems, AZ ............ 600,000 Center for Spatial Technologies, MS .................................................... 700,000 Integrated data query sharing system for maritime domain aware- ness, WA ............................................................................................. 1,100,000 Regional Interstate Commerce and Transportation Policy Harmoni- zation Project, SD ............................................................................... 250,000 UA Transportation Hybrid Electric Vehicle & Fuel Cell Research Program, AL ....................................................................................... 1,250,000 WestStart Vehicular Flywheel Project, WA ........................................ 1,000,000 Worcester
Recommended publications
  • Meyer Glitzenstein & Crystal
    Meyer Glitzenstein & Crystal 1601 Connecticut Avenue, N.W. Suite 700 Washington, D.C. 20009-1056 Katherine A. Meyer Telephone (202) 588-5206 Eric R. Glitzenstein Fax (202) 588-5049 Howard M. Crystal [email protected] William S. Eubanks II Rosemary Greene (Admitted in MT & IL) Michelle Sinnott (Admitted in VA) January 8, 2014 VIA CERTIFIED MAIL Capt. Roger Nienberg Deborah Lee James Ohio Air National Guard Secretary of the Air Force 200 RHS/EM 1670 Air Force Pentagon 1200 JN Camp Perry E. Road Washington, DC 20330-1670 Port Clinton, OH 43452-9577 Dan Ashe, Director General Mark A. Welsh III United States Fish & Wildlife Service Air Force Chief of Staff 1849 C Street, N.W. 1670 Air Force Pentagon Washington, DC 20240 Washington, DC 20330-1670 Sally Jewell, Secretary United States Department of the Interior 1849 C Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20240 Re: NOTICE OF INTENT TO SUE FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT, BALD AND GOLDEN EAGLE PROTECTION ACT, MIGRATORY BIRD TREATY ACT, AND NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT IN CONNECTION WITH THE CAMP PERRY AIR NATIONAL GUARD WIND ENERGY PROJECT IN OTTAWA COUNTY, OHIO On behalf of the American Bird Conservancy and Black Swamp Bird Observatory (collectively referred to herein as “ABC”), we hereby provide notice of intent to sue, pursuant to section 11(g) of the Endangered Species Act, 16 U.S.C. § 1540(g) (“ESA”), concerning the Ohio Air National Guard’s (“ANG”) installation and long-term operation of a wind turbine at Camp Perry in Ottawa County, Ohio, which is violating and will continue to violate section 7 of the ESA – because ANG has refused even to engage in consultation with the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Phase I Archaeological Survey Along KY 55 in Perry County, Kentucky
    Contract Publication Series 17-178 AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY FOR THE NEW EXIT 55 AND ASSOCIATED INTERCHANGE ON HAL ROGERS PARKWAY IN PERRY COUNTY, KENTUCKY (ITEM NO. 10-8903.00) by Brian G. DelCastello Prepared for Prepared by Kentucky West Virginia Ohio Indiana Louisiana Tennessee Virginia Contract Publication Series 17-178 AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY FOR THE NEW EXIT 55 AND ASSOCIATED INTERCHANGE ON HAL ROGERS PARKWAY IN PERRY COUNTY, KENTUCKY (ITEM NO. 10-8903.00) by Brian G. DelCastello, RPA With contributions by Heather D. Barras Prepared for David Waldner Division of Environmental Analysis Kentucky Transportation Cabinet 200 Mero Street Frankfort, Kentucky 40622 Phone: (502) 564-7250 Fax: (502) 564-5655 Prepared by Cultural Resource Analysts, Inc. 151 Walton Avenue Lexington, Kentucky 40508 Phone: (859) 252-4737 Fax: (859) 254-3747 Email: [email protected] CRA Project No.: K17K008 __________________________ ________________________ Charles M. Niquette, RPA Richard L. Herndon, RPA Co-Principal Investigator Co-Principal Investigator August 28, 2017 Lead Agency: Federal Highway Administration Kentucky Transportation Cabinet Item Number 10-8903.00 Statewide Contract No. PON2 1600003838, Letter Agreement 26-DBD OSA Project Registration No.: FY17_9229 ABSTRACT On June 26–27 and July 17, 2017, Cultural Resource Analysts, Inc., personnel conducted an archaeological survey for the proposed new Exit 55 along the Hal Rogers Parkway in western Perry County, Kentucky (Item No. 10-8903.00). The project area is situated west of the modern community of Hazard. The survey was conducted at the request of David Waldner of the Kentucky Transportation Cabinet, Division of Environmental Analysis. The project area measured approximately 47.5 ha (117.4 acres) in total size.
    [Show full text]
  • Topography Along the Virginia-Kentucky Border
    Preface: Topography along the Virginia-Kentucky border. It took a long time for the Appalachian Mountain range to attain its present appearance, but no one was counting. Outcrops found at the base of Pine Mountain are Devonian rock, dating back 400 million years. But the rocks picked off the ground around Lexington, Kentucky, are even older; this limestone is from the Cambrian period, about 600 million years old. It is the same type and age rock found near the bottom of the Grand Canyon in Colorado. Of course, a mountain range is not created in a year or two. It took them about 400 years to obtain their character, and the Appalachian range has a lot of character. Geologists tell us this range extends from Alabama into Canada, and separates the plains of the eastern seaboard from the low-lying valleys of the Ohio and Mississippi rivers. Some subdivide the Appalachians into the Piedmont Province, the Blue Ridge, the Valley and Ridge area, and the Appalachian plateau. We also learn that during the Paleozoic era, the site of this mountain range was nothing more than a shallow sea; but during this time, as sediments built up, and the bottom of the sea sank. The hinge line between the area sinking, and the area being uplifted seems to have shifted gradually westward. At the end of the Paleozoric era, the earth movement are said to have reversed, at which time the horizontal layers of the rock were uplifted and folded, and for the next 200 million years the land was eroded, which provided material to cover the surrounding areas, including the coastal plain.
    [Show full text]
  • Ultimate RV Dump Station Guide
    Ultimate RV Dump Station Guide A Complete Compendium Of RV Dump Stations Across The USA Publiished By: Covenant Publishing LLC 1201 N Orange St. Suite 7003 Wilmington, DE 19801 Copyrighted Material Copyright 2010 Covenant Publishing. All rights reserved worldwide. Ultimate RV Dump Station Guide Page 2 Contents New Mexico ............................................................... 87 New York .................................................................... 89 Introduction ................................................................. 3 North Carolina ........................................................... 91 Alabama ........................................................................ 5 North Dakota ............................................................. 93 Alaska ............................................................................ 8 Ohio ............................................................................ 95 Arizona ......................................................................... 9 Oklahoma ................................................................... 98 Arkansas ..................................................................... 13 Oregon ...................................................................... 100 California .................................................................... 15 Pennsylvania ............................................................ 104 Colorado ..................................................................... 23 Rhode Island ...........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • RECEIV United States Department of the Interior National Park Service SE? 6 5 National Register of Historic Places Registration Form Hkiancpbbewl
    NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 10024-0018 (Oct. 1990) RECEIV United States Department of the Interior National Park Service SE? 6 5 National Register of Historic Places Registration Form HKianCPBBEWl This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions ii National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each Item by marking "x" or by entering the information requested. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicab! tions. architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property________________________________________________ historic name New Market/Linvale-Snydertown Historic District_________ other names/site number ______________________________________________ 2. Location ~ street & number Route 31, Linvale f Snydertown & Woodsvilie Rdsg not for publication city or town East and West Amwell Township*._____________Tyyk n vicinity state_______NJ______ code034 county Hunterdon_____ code 019 zip code 08551 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this 53 nomination D request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property S meets D does not meet the National Register criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant D nationally d statewide, I^lpjQally.
    [Show full text]
  • Prestressed Concrete Girders Achieve Record Lengths Tacoma, Washington
    THE CONCRETE BRIDGE MAGAZINE FALL 2019 www.aspirebridge.org WSDOT inspects 223-ft-long, 247-kip lightweight concrete girder Prestressed Concrete Girders Achieve Record Lengths Tacoma, Washington BRIDGES OF THE FOOTHILLS PARKWAY Great Smoky Mountains National Park DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER VETERANS MEMORIAL BRIDGE Anderson, Indiana MARC BASNIGHT BRIDGE Dare County, North Carolina COURTLAND STREET BRIDGE Atlanta, Georgia Permit No. 567 No. Permit Lebanon Junction, KY Junction, Lebanon Postage Paid Postage Presorted Standard Presorted OVER NEW I-35W BRIDGE I-91 BRATTLEBORO BRIDGE MINNESOTA 40 VERMONT YEARS PENOBSCOT NARROWS BRIDGE & OBSERVATORY HONOLULU RAIL TRANSIT PROJECT MAINE HAWAII 4TH STREET BRIDGE COLORADO AIRTRAIN JFK 410 NEW YORK SARAH MILDRED LONG BRIDGE MAINE/NEW HAMPSHIRE AWARDS FOR OUR CUSTOMERS ACROSS THE UNITED STATES I-280 VETERANS’ GLASS CITY SKYWAY VICTORY BRIDGE OHIO NEW JERSEY DAUPHIN ISLAND BRIDGE ALABAMA FOUR BEARS BRIDGE Creating Bridges As Art® NORTH DAKOTA www.figgbridge.com | 1 800 358 3444 NEW WINONA BRIDGE MINNESOTA VETERANS MEMORIAL BRIDGE TEXAS US 191 COLORADO RIVER BRIDGE I-76 ALLEGHENY RIVER BRIDGE UTAH PENNSYLVANIA I-275 SUNSHINE SKYWAY BRIDGE BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY VIADUCT FLORIDA NORTH CAROLINA SENATOR WILLIAM V. ROTH, JR. BRIDGE NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY ARCHES SOUTH NORFOLK JORDAN BRIDGE DELAWARE TENNESSEE VIRGINIA CONTENTS Features “A Shot in the Arm” 6 Armeni Consulting Services helps many clients address 10 estimating and scheduling challenges as the array of delivery and construction methods grows. Bridges of the Foothills Parkway 10 Dwight D. Eisenhower Veterans Memorial Bridge 14 Marc Basnight Bridge 18 Courtland Street Bridge 24 Departments Photo: Eastern Federal Lands Highway Division of the Federal Highway Administration.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Feasibility Study 2012
    POKAGON BAND OF POTAWATOMI INDIANS Transit Feasibility Study Improving Mobility for Tribal Citizens DRAFT – AUGUST 13, 2012 2012 Southwest Michigan Planning Commission 185 E Main Street Benton Harbor Michigan Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 1 2 STUDY AREA .................................................................................................................... 2 3 COMMUNITY & DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS ....................................................... 5 Tribal Population ......................................................................................................................... 6 Elders ........................................................................................................................................... 9 Poverty ...................................................................................................................................... 10 People with Disabilities ............................................................................................................. 11 Youth ......................................................................................................................................... 12 Households with One Vehicle or Less ....................................................................................... 12 Trip Generators ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • (Asos) Implementation Plan
    AUTOMATED SURFACE OBSERVING SYSTEM (ASOS) IMPLEMENTATION PLAN VAISALA CEILOMETER - CL31 November 14, 2008 U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Weather Service / Office of Operational Systems/Observing Systems Branch National Weather Service / Office of Science and Technology/Development Branch Table of Contents Section Page Executive Summary............................................................................ iii 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................... 1 1.1 Background.......................................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose................................................................................. 2 1.3 Scope.................................................................................... 2 1.4 Applicable Documents......................................................... 2 1.5 Points of Contact.................................................................. 4 2.0 Pre-Operational Implementation Activities ............................ 6 3.0 Operational Implementation Planning Activities ................... 6 3.1 Planning/Decision Activities ............................................... 7 3.2 Logistic Support Activities .................................................. 11 3.3 Configuration Management (CM) Activities....................... 12 3.4 Operational Support Activities ............................................ 12 4.0 Operational Implementation (OI) Activities .........................
    [Show full text]
  • Safetaxi Americas Coverage List – 21S5 Cycle
    SafeTaxi Americas Coverage List – 21S5 Cycle Brazil Acre Identifier Airport Name City State SBCZ Cruzeiro do Sul International Airport Cruzeiro do Sul AC SBRB Plácido de Castro Airport Rio Branco AC Alagoas Identifier Airport Name City State SBMO Zumbi dos Palmares International Airport Maceió AL Amazonas Identifier Airport Name City State SBEG Eduardo Gomes International Airport Manaus AM SBMN Ponta Pelada Military Airport Manaus AM SBTF Tefé Airport Tefé AM SBTT Tabatinga International Airport Tabatinga AM SBUA São Gabriel da Cachoeira Airport São Gabriel da Cachoeira AM Amapá Identifier Airport Name City State SBMQ Alberto Alcolumbre International Airport Macapá AP Bahia Identifier Airport Name City State SBIL Bahia-Jorge Amado Airport Ilhéus BA SBLP Bom Jesus da Lapa Airport Bom Jesus da Lapa BA SBPS Porto Seguro Airport Porto Seguro BA SBSV Deputado Luís Eduardo Magalhães International Airport Salvador BA SBTC Hotéis Transamérica Airport Una BA SBUF Paulo Afonso Airport Paulo Afonso BA SBVC Vitória da Conquista/Glauber de Andrade Rocha Vitória da Conquista BA Ceará Identifier Airport Name City State SBAC Aracati/Aeroporto Regional de Aracati Aracati CE SBFZ Pinto Martins International Airport Fortaleza CE SBJE Comandante Ariston Pessoa Cruz CE SBJU Orlando Bezerra de Menezes Airport Juazeiro do Norte CE Distrito Federal Identifier Airport Name City State SBBR Presidente Juscelino Kubitschek International Airport Brasília DF Espírito Santo Identifier Airport Name City State SBVT Eurico de Aguiar Salles Airport Vitória ES *Denotes
    [Show full text]
  • Akshai Singh Organizer, Amalgamated Transit Union Cleveland Heights, Ohio
    Akshai Singh Organizer, Amalgamated Transit Union Cleveland Heights, Ohio To the House Finance Committee, Thank you Mr. Chairman, and Ranking Member for hearing my testimony this morning. My name is Akshai Singh, and I am an organizer with the Amalgamated Transit Union. My union represents thousands of bus drivers, mechanics, train operators, vehicle and facilities service workers, and dispatch and scheduler staff at transit agencies around the State of Ohio. We are joined in coalition with MOVE Ohio, who you have heard from, which also includes the Transport Workers Union workers here at COTA and at Akron METRO. I am here to urge this body to consider an increase to the gas tax, only with the inclusion of a statutory provision that recognizes transit's inherent highway purposes, in alignment with the Federal Highway Administration standards. It is these standards by which ODOT is proposing 'flexing' highway dollars to transit, and these standards also satisfy constitutionality regarding Ohio gas taxes in Article XII, Section 5a. The late Lieutenant Governor and Cleveland Mayor Voinavich saw to the procurement of GCRTA's heavy rail cars in the late 70s and early 80s. George Voinavich supported Ohio's only transit rail system, and knew its value to our community and economic opportunities. These rail cars are now kept alive through the tireless work of our men and women of the ATU Local 268. They were a key reason for Cleveland being chosen as the host city for the Republican National Convention, anchor what growth we're experiencing, and provide access across the county, and to the world via Hopkins International Airport.
    [Show full text]
  • Phase 1 Study
    DELAWARE RIVER JOINT TOLL BRIDGE COMMISSION SOUTHERLY CROSSINGS CORRIDOR STUDY PHASE I TRANSPORTATION STUDY Prepared for: DELAWARE RIVER JOINT TOLL BRIDGE COMMISSION Prepared by: THE LOUIS BERGER GROUP, INC. EAST ORANGE, NEW JERSEY June 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS Southerly Crossings Corridor Study TABLE OF CONTENTS Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.............................................................Executive Summary Page 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND STUDY METHODOLOGY.............................................1-1 1.1 Background.........................................................................................1-1 1.2 Objectives of the Southerly Crossings Corridor Study .....................................1-3 1.3 Traffic Forecasting & Analysis Methodology................................................1-3 1.3.1 Overview.............................................................................................................1-3 1.3.2 Travel Demand Forecasting ................................................................................1-4 1.4 Alternatives Development and Screening .....................................................1-7 1.5 Alternatives Analysis-Measures of Effectiveness .......................................... 1-10 1.5.1 Level of Service...............................................................................................1-10 1.5.2 Construction Cost Estimates............................................................................1-11 2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS ..............................................................................2-1
    [Show full text]
  • May 7,2009 Be Available in the Near Future at Http
    Monlo no De porlme nf of lronsoo rt oii on Jim Lvnch, Dîrector *ruhrylaùtlthNde 2701 Prospect Avenue Brîon Schweífzer, Gov ernor PO Box 201001 Heleno MT 59620-1001 May 7,2009 Ted Mathis Gallatin Field 850 Gallatin Field Road #6 Belgrade MT 59714 Subject: Montana Aimorts Economic knpact Study 2009 Montana State Aviation System Plan Dear Ted, I am pleased to announce that the Economic Impact Study of Montana Airports has been completed. This study was a two-year collaborative eflort between the Montana Department of Transportation (MDT) Aeronautics Division, the Federal Aviation Administration, Wilbur Smith and Associates and Morrison Maierle Inc. The enclosed study is an effort to break down aviation's significant contributions in Montana and show how these impacts affect economies on a statewide and local level. Depending on your location, you may also find enclosed several copies of an individual economic summary specific to your airport. Results ofthe study clearly show that Montana's 120 public use airports are a major catalyst to our economy. Montana enplanes over 1.5 million prissengers per year at our 15 commercial service airports, half of whom are visiting tourists. The economic value of aviation is over $1.56 billion and contributes nearly 4.5 percent to our total gross state product. There arc 18,759 aviation dependent positions in Montana, accounting for four percent of the total workforce and $600 million in wages. In addition to the economic benefits, the study also highlights how Montana residents increasingly depend on aviation to support their healtþ welfare, and safety. Montana airports support critical services for medical care, agriculture, recreation, emergency access, law enforcement, and fire fighting.
    [Show full text]