DOCSLIB.ORG

Phase 1 Study

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Phase 1 Study DELAWARE RIVER JOINT TOLL BRIDGE COMMISSION SOUTHERLY CROSSINGS CORRIDOR STUDY PHASE I TRANSPORTATION STUDY Prepared for: DELAWARE RIVER JOINT TOLL BRIDGE COMMISSION Prepared by: THE LOUIS BERGER GROUP, INC. EAST ORANGE, NEW JERSEY June 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS Southerly Crossings Corridor Study TABLE OF CONTENTS Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.............................................................Executive Summary Page 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND STUDY METHODOLOGY.............................................1-1 1.1 Background.........................................................................................1-1 1.2 Objectives of the Southerly Crossings Corridor Study .....................................1-3 1.3 Traffic Forecasting & Analysis Methodology................................................1-3 1.3.1 Overview.............................................................................................................1-3 1.3.2 Travel Demand Forecasting ................................................................................1-4 1.4 Alternatives Development and Screening .....................................................1-7 1.5 Alternatives Analysis-Measures of Effectiveness .......................................... 1-10 1.5.1 Level of Service...............................................................................................1-10 1.5.2 Construction Cost Estimates............................................................................1-11 2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS ..............................................................................2-1 2.1 Travel Patterns and Trends in the Corridor Per Other Studies............................2-1 2.2 Existing Traffic Volumes and Levels of Service........................................... 2-11 2.2.1 Route 1 Toll Bridge ................................................................... 2-12 2.2.2 Lower Trenton Bridge (Bridge Street & Trenton Makes)...................... 2-13 2.2.3 Calhoun Street Bridge ................................................................ 2-13 2.2.4 Route I-95/Scudder Falls Bridge ................................................... 2-14 2.3 Summary of Existing Conditions and Needs ............................................... 2-15 3.0 FUTURE NO-BUILD CONDITIONS.................................................................3-1 3.1 Future No-Build Highway and Passenger Rail Network ...................................3-1 3.2 Future Population and Employment............................................................3-1 3.3 Future No-Build Traffic Volumes and Levels of Service ..................................3-4 3.3.1 2005 Future No-Build Traffic Volumes and Levels of Service.........................3-4 3.3.2 2025 Future No-Build Traffic Volumes and Levels of Service.........................3-5 3.4 Summary of Future No-Build Conditions and Needs .......................................3-7 4.0 FUTURE NO-BUILD PLUS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT (TSM) CONDITIONS.............................................................4-1 4.1 Identification of TSM Improvements ..........................................................4-1 4.2 Future No-Build Plus Traffic Volumes and Levels of Service ............................4-7 4.2.1 2005 No-Build Plus...........................................................................................4-7 4.2.2 2025 No-Build Plus...........................................................................................4-8 4.3 Summary of Future No-Build Plus Conditions and Needs .............................................4-9 Delaware River Joint Toll Bridge Commission TOC Page 1 Southerly Crossings Corridor Study TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED) Page 5.0 SENSITIVITY EVALUATION OF POTENTIAL BRIDGE IMPROVEMENT CONCEPTS .................................................................................................5-1 6.0 FUTURE 2025 BUILD SCENARIOS WITH ACCEPTABLE LEVELS OF SERVICE .6-1 6.1 Build Scenarios ....................................................................................6-1 6.1.1 Alternative A .....................................................................................................6-1 6.1.2 Alternative B .....................................................................................................6-3 7.0 COST ESTIMATES.......................................................................................7-1 8.0 CONCLUSION .............................................................................................8-1 9.0 IMPLEMENTATION.....................................................................................9-1 10.0 LIST OF REFERENCES .............................................................................. 10-1 APPENDICES Appendix A Results of Model Runs Under Various Scenarios LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1-1 Locations of the Corridor, Bridges and the Park-and-Ride Lots..........................1-2 Figure 1-2 Study Area..........................................................................................1-5 Figure 4-1 Illustrates the Transit Scoring Methodology..................................................4-2 Delaware River Joint Toll Bridge Commission TOC Page 2 Southerly Crossings Corridor Study TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED) Page LIST OF TABLES Table ES-1 Levels of Service (LOS) for Various Studied Scenarios................................... ES-2 Table 1-1 Southerly Crossings Study: Screening Framework..........................................1-8 Table 2-1 Relevant 1990 Census Journey to Work Travel Patterns...................................2-4 Table 2-2 Route 1 Bridge Existing Operating Conditions ............................................ 2-12 Table 2-3 Lower Trenton Bridge Existing Operating Conditions ................................... 2-13 Table 2-4 Calhoun Street Bridge Existing Operating Conditions.................................... 2-14 Table 2-5 Scudder Falls Bridge Existing Operating Conditions ..................................... 2-15 Table 3-1 Existing and Estimated Future Population ....................................................3-2 Table 3-2 Existing and Estimated Future Employment..................................................3-3 Table 3-3 Route 1 Bridge 2005 No-Build Operating Conditions ......................................3-4 Table 3-4 Lower Trenton Bridge 2005 No-Build Operating Conditions .............................3-4 Table 3-5 Calhoun Street Bridge 2005 No-Build Operating Conditions .............................3-5 Table 3-6 Scudder Falls Bridge 2005 No-Build Operating Conditions...............................3-5 Table 3-7 Route 1 Bridge 2025 No-Build Operating Conditions ......................................3-5 Table 3-8 Lower Trenton Bridge 2025 No-Build Operating Conditions .............................3-6 Table 3-9 Calhoun Street Bridge 2025 No-Build Operating Conditions .............................3-6 Table 3-10 Scudder Falls Bridge 2025 No-Build Operating Conditions...............................3-7 Table 4-1 High Transit Potential Communities and Potentially Suitable Investments .............4-3 Table 4-2 Medium-High Transit Potential Communities and Potentially Suitable Investments ..4-4 Table 4-3 Medium Transit Potential Communities and Potentially Suitable Investments .........4-5 Table 4-4 Route 1 Bridge 2005 No-Build Plus Operating Conditions ................................4-7 Table 4-5 Lower Trenton Bridge 2005 No-Build Plus Operating Conditions.......................4-8 Table 4-6 Calhoun Street Bridge 2005 No-Build Plus Operating Conditions .......................4-8 Table 4-7 Scudder Falls Bridge 2005 No-Build Plus Operating Conditions.........................4-8 Table 5-1 Route 1 Bridge 2025 Operating Conditions Under Various Scenarios ..................5-1 Table 5-2 Lower Trenton-Bridge 2025 Operating Conditions Under Various Scenarios .........5-2 Table 5-3 Calhoun Street Bridge 2025 Operating Conditions Under Various Scenarios..........5-2 Table 5-4 Scudder Falls Bridge 2025 Operating Conditions Under Various Scenarios ...........5-3 Table 6-1 Route 1 Bridge Alternative A 2025 Operating Conditions.................................6-1 Table 6-2 Lower Trenton Bridge Alternative A 2025 Operating Conditions........................6-1 Table 6-3 Calhoun Street Bridge Alternative A 2025 Operating Conditions ........................6-2 Table 6-4 Schudder Falls Bridge Alternative A 2025 Operating Conditions ........................6-2 Table 6-5 Falls-Hamilton Bridge Alternative A 2025 Operating Conditions........................6-2 Table 6-6 Route 1 Bridge Alternative B 2025 Operating Conditions .................................6-3 Table 6-7 Lower Trenton Bridge Alternative B 2025 Operating Conditions........................6-3 Table 6-8 Calhoun Street Bridge Alternative B 2025 Operating Conditions ........................6-4 Table 6-9 Scudder Falls Bridge Alternative B 2025 Operating Conditions..........................6-4 Delaware River Joint Toll Bridge Commission TOC Page 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Southerly Crossings Corridor Study EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Report presents the results of the Southerly Crossings Corridor Study (the “Study”) prepared for the Delaware River Joint Toll Bridge Commission (the “Commission”) by The Louis Berger Group, Inc. This Report summarizes the results of the analysis of various alternatives to alleviate congestion in the Southerly Crossings Corridor in the year 2025. Other consulting firms contributing to the Study include Winsor Associates, Ammann & Whitney,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Final Point of Access Study
    Prepared for: I-95/Scudder Falls Bridge Improvement Project Technical Memorandum No. 28 FINAL POINT OF ACCESS STUDY Contract C-393A, Capital Project No. CP0301A Prepared by: Philadelphia, PA In association with: HNTB Corporation STV Inc. Gannett Fleming, Inc. A.D. Marble & Company Kise Straw & Kolodner, Inc. Riverfront Associates, Inc. November, 2012 1 2 Technical Memorandum No. 28 – Final Point of Access Study Contract C-393A, Capital Project No. CP0301A I-95/Scudder Falls Bridge Improvement Project TABLE OF CONTENTS A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY, INTRODUCTION AMD REQUIREMENTS ... 1 I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................ 1 Purpose of Access......................................................................... 1 Summary of Findings .................................................................... 2 II. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................. 7 Project Description .............................................................. 7 Study Area Description ........................................................ 7 Project Area Description .................................................... 10 Project Purpose and Need .................................................. 11 III. REQUIREMENTS FOR APPROVAL OF ACCESS ..................................... 12 B. ENGINEERING STUDY ............................................................. 17 I. CURRENT CONDITIONS ........................................................... 17 Roadway Network
    [Show full text]
  • Prom 2018 Event Store List 1.17.18
    State City Mall/Shopping Center Name Address AK Anchorage 5th Avenue Mall-Sur 406 W 5th Ave AL Birmingham Tutwiler Farm 5060 Pinnacle Sq AL Dothan Wiregrass Commons 900 Commons Dr Ste 900 AL Hoover Riverchase Galleria 2300 Riverchase Galleria AL Mobile Bel Air Mall 3400 Bell Air Mall AL Montgomery Eastdale Mall 1236 Eastdale Mall AL Prattville High Point Town Ctr 550 Pinnacle Pl AL Spanish Fort Spanish Fort Twn Ctr 22500 Town Center Ave AL Tuscaloosa University Mall 1701 Macfarland Blvd E AR Fayetteville Nw Arkansas Mall 4201 N Shiloh Dr AR Fort Smith Central Mall 5111 Rogers Ave AR Jonesboro Mall @ Turtle Creek 3000 E Highland Dr Ste 516 AR North Little Rock Mc Cain Shopg Cntr 3929 Mccain Blvd Ste 500 AR Rogers Pinnacle Hlls Promde 2202 Bellview Rd AR Russellville Valley Park Center 3057 E Main AZ Casa Grande Promnde@ Casa Grande 1041 N Promenade Pkwy AZ Flagstaff Flagstaff Mall 4600 N Us Hwy 89 AZ Glendale Arrowhead Towne Center 7750 W Arrowhead Towne Center AZ Goodyear Palm Valley Cornerst 13333 W Mcdowell Rd AZ Lake Havasu City Shops @ Lake Havasu 5651 Hwy 95 N AZ Mesa Superst'N Springs Ml 6525 E Southern Ave AZ Phoenix Paradise Valley Mall 4510 E Cactus Rd AZ Tucson Tucson Mall 4530 N Oracle Rd AZ Tucson El Con Shpg Cntr 3501 E Broadway AZ Tucson Tucson Spectrum 5265 S Calle Santa Cruz AZ Yuma Yuma Palms S/C 1375 S Yuma Palms Pkwy CA Antioch Orchard @Slatten Rch 4951 Slatten Ranch Rd CA Arcadia Westfld Santa Anita 400 S Baldwin Ave CA Bakersfield Valley Plaza 2501 Ming Ave CA Brea Brea Mall 400 Brea Mall CA Carlsbad Shoppes At Carlsbad
    [Show full text]
  • RECEIV United States Department of the Interior National Park Service SE? 6 5 National Register of Historic Places Registration Form Hkiancpbbewl
    NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 10024-0018 (Oct. 1990) RECEIV United States Department of the Interior National Park Service SE? 6 5 National Register of Historic Places Registration Form HKianCPBBEWl This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions ii National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each Item by marking "x" or by entering the information requested. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicab! tions. architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property________________________________________________ historic name New Market/Linvale-Snydertown Historic District_________ other names/site number ______________________________________________ 2. Location ~ street & number Route 31, Linvale f Snydertown & Woodsvilie Rdsg not for publication city or town East and West Amwell Township*._____________Tyyk n vicinity state_______NJ______ code034 county Hunterdon_____ code 019 zip code 08551 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this 53 nomination D request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property S meets D does not meet the National Register criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant D nationally d statewide, I^lpjQally.
    [Show full text]
  • (CM/CI) Rapid Bridge Replacement Project Magnitude, Challenges & Technology Date: March 28, 2018
    Construction Management/Construction Inspection (CM/CI) Rapid Bridge Replacement Project Magnitude, Challenges & Technology Date: March 28, 2018 www.trcsolutions.com | Pittsburgh Section Presenters Scott Gallaher, PG SVP Infrastructure, CEI/CIM Practice Lead [email protected] Richard Shoemaker VP – Principle Manager – CEI, Construction Engineering Group [email protected] Colby Dressler, PE Project Manager/Construction Engineer [email protected] Robert Horwhat, PE Director Structural Materials Inspection [email protected] www.trcsolutions.com 2 Agenda TRC PA Rapid Bridge Project Relevant Projects Polyester Polymer Concrete P3 Materials Inspections Conclusions (Takeaways) www.trcsolutions.com 3 Company Fact Sheet About TRC A pioneer in groundbreaking scientific and engineering developments since the 1960s, TRC is a national engineering, environmental consulting and construction management firm providing integrated services to the power, oil and gas, environmental and infrastructure markets. From more than 120 offices throughout the U.S., our 4,100 employees serve a broad range of commercial, industrial and government clients, implementing complex projects from initial concept to operations. Employees 4,100 Headquarters Lowell, Massachusetts Locations 120 U.S. Office; U.K Office, China (Shanghai) Office, Canada Office ENR Top 500 Design Firm Rank 23 Businesses While we work in a broad range of industries our focus is on the Environmental, Power/Utility, Oil and Gas and Transportation sectors. Services span categories including: Power Oil & Gas Environment al 4 Infrastructure www.trcsolutions.com TRC Offices . 4100+ employees . 120+ U.S. offices; London and Shanghai office www.trcsolutions.com 5 Infrastructure Highways and Roadways | Bridges | Utilities, Sewers and Water Lines | Railroads | Building Structures . Roadway and Bridge Engineering Design .
    [Show full text]
  • South Norfolk Jordan Bridge (“SNJB”) Is a 5,372 Ft Fixed Bridge That Connects the City of Chesapeake to the City of Portsmouth Over the Elizabeth River In
    TOLL REVENUE NEW BUILD / REPLACEMENT SOUTH NORFOLK PRIVATIZATION PRIVATE FINANCING UNSOLICITED BID JORDAN BRIDGE CHESAPEAKE, VA The South Norfolk Jordan Bridge (“SNJB”) is a 5,372 ft fixed bridge that connects the City of Chesapeake to the City of Portsmouth over the Elizabeth River in Virginia. The City of Chesapeake had decommissioned the original Jordan Bridge in November 2008. An unsolicited proposal submitted by United Bridge Partners (“UBP”) to replace the Jordan Bridge with a new, privately owned bridge was approved by the City of Chesapeake in January 20091 by executing an Acquisition and Development Agreement (“ADA”) between UBP and the City of Chesapeake. As part of the ADA, UBP assumed responsibility to demolish the existing Jordan Bridge, aquired the right of way and easments associated with the bridge, and the right to toll, design, construct, finance, operate and assume ownership of a new bridge and associated tolling facilities on the SNJB. The construction of the SNJB was reported to be privately financed. Project revenue on the SNJB comes from tolls, set by the private operator with no defined limit, which are collected electronically on the bridge2. Note: the facts of this case study were reviewed by UBP. We have provided Chesapeake footnotes to describe instances where UBP disputes information in the public domain. BACKGROUND + PROJECT DRIVERS The Elizabeth River Corridor between Midtown Tunnel and High Rise Bridge in southern eastern Virginia near the Chesapeake Bay serves approximately 250,000 Figure 1: Elizabeth River Crossings. vehicle trip crossings per weekday. It is a growing corridor that primarily serves Source: Pickard, A.
    [Show full text]
  • New Jersey and National Registers of Historic Places Last Update: 9/28/2021 MERCER County
    NJ DEP - Historic Preservation Office Page 1 of 19 New Jersey and National Registers of Historic Places Last Update: 9/28/2021 MERCER County Bath House and Day Camp of the Trenton Jewish Community MERCER County Center (ID#1648) 999 Lower Ferry Road NR: 2/23/1984 (NR Reference #: 84002730) East Windsor Township SR: 1/6/1984 Jesse Anderson House (Holland House) (ID#3251) (a.k.a. Trenton Bath House) Old Cranbury Road SHPO Opinion: 7/8/1994 Bear Tavern Road/Jacob's Creek Crossing Rural Historic District (ID#5112) Bear Tavern Road (County Route 579); Jacobs Creek Road Robert Ayres Farm (ID#1642) NR: 11/30/2011 (NR Reference #: 11000872) 261 Dutch Neck Road SR: 10/3/2011 SHPO Opinion: 2/24/1994 See Main Entry / Filed Location: Camden and Amboy Railroad Main Line Historic District (ID#2970) MERCER County, Hopewell Township Camden and Amboy Railroad right-of-way SHPO Opinion: 3/23/2016 Burt / Hendrickson / Atchley Farmstead (ID#3750) (Revised SHPO Opinion, Boundary Extension includes Pennington Road (NJ Route 31) Railroad Bridge No. 60.71. Original opinioin 6/26/75; Boundary SHPO Opinion: 5/8/1998 clarified 10/4/91. Extends through thirty-one municipalities in four counties.) Charles S. Maddock House (ID#4863) See Main Entry / Filed Location: 1076 River Road BURLINGTON County, Bordentown City SHPO Opinion: 12/10/2008 Isaac Pullen/Lemuel Black House (ID#4969) Delaware and Bound Brook (Reading) Railroad Historic District 866 Old York Road (ID#4540) SHPO Opinion: 3/30/2010 SHPO Opinion: 9/9/2005 Also located in: Former McGraw-Hill Publishing Company Office Complex (ID#5754) MERCER County, Hopewell Borough 148 & 159 Princeton-Hightstown Road MERCER County, Hopewell Township SHPO Opinion: 6/3/2020 MERCER County, Pennington Borough (a.k.a.
    [Show full text]
  • Trenton Transit Center to Oxford Valley Mall
    A ®SEPT 127March 9, 2020 ective Eff Trenton Transit Center to Oxford Valley Mall Serving Morrisville Customer Service 215-580-7800 TDD/TTY 215-580-7853 www.septa.org River Rd d S v NJT To Points North R to 29 206 E State St g A y ny Lafa Fro Clinton St Av le Hill Rd yette St nt St M d rd H Morrisville o oo TRENTON a e d D Br n allenber nw Y a R t e v e ey Yardley Morrisville Rd e Temporary W oad St g W Gre c Vall Shopping lm o R. n o rd a m r xfo o Detour rr Hamilton A o c O re e e h k Center n ry TRENTON St Francis A Pine Gr g R S A n v t v a d P TRANSIT Medical Center L 295 v en Makefield Rd n T s CENTER Chamber o d Ston y Market St wnship Line Rd R o Trenton A lv Oxford Valley Mall y y Hill Rd ve Rd a 206 alle d West n Chambersburg rd V R Big Oak Rd ia Txofo r y MORRISVILLE Clinton St O wn Center D Bu e A ck Dr ll v s St 295 s Town a lvd V M 1 Br B 127 Big Oak Rd oad St ty St n a Pennsbury almer St w Macy’s k o d P 29 t M e e d r l R i o f Plaza Liber d f i d Sesame e d d x 129 d y l i R 32 e l O d e D UA Oxfolrd k M l Place t a o Jefferson R e St a O v Valley w e V d Br W g 206 n i Bucks l oad St d Bridg Chestnut r r Shops at oodbourne Rd D 127 B B own S a o l T t f JCPenney v s o w Park x d k Makefield uc n Trenton A Lalor St O B y a Village H est r River LINE Lincoln i 1 l e l W Plaza Oxf R To Camden Big Oak Rd 1 or d R Woodbourne Square Valle d Woolston Rd 1 Connections at y Rd i OxfordOld Lincoln Valley Mall: Hwy 13 Ne v 14 129 wbold Rd e Lincoln Hwy 14, 127, 128, 1291 P 1 128 d ennsylv r risville R Lincoln Hwy or BUS Arleans M r NEW JERSEY 1 A e Bristol Rd Kings Plaza ania A 295 v w Court at Olds Blvd Lo uck B st o wn Dr Oxford Valley 129 vd N d v l R renton Rd B S.
    [Show full text]
  • Philadelphia Premium Outlets® the Simon Experience — Where Brands & Communities Come Together
    PHILADELPHIA PREMIUM OUTLETS® THE SIMON EXPERIENCE — WHERE BRANDS & COMMUNITIES COME TOGETHER More than real estate, we are a company of experiences. For our guests, we provide distinctive shopping, dining and entertainment. For our retailers, we offer the unique opportunity to thrive in the best retail real estate in the best markets. From new projects and redevelopments to acquisitions and mergers, we are continuously evaluating our portfolio to enhance the Simon experience - places where people choose to shop and retailers want to be. We deliver: SCALE Largest global owner of retail real estate including Malls, Simon Premium Outlets® and The Mills® QUALITY Iconic, irreplaceable properties in great locations INVESTMENT Active portfolio management increases productivity and returns GROWTH Core business and strategic acquisitions drive performance EXPERIENCE Decades of expertise in development, ownership, and management That’s the advantage of leasing with Simon. PROPERTY OVERVIEW PHILADELPHIA PREMIUM OUTLETS® LIMERICK TOWNSHIP, PA Easton MAJOR METROPOLITAN AREAS SELECT TENANTS Allentown Delaware 78 Water Gap Philadelphia: 35 miles southeast Neiman Marcus Last Call, adidas, Ann Taylor Factory Store, Asics, Banana Republic Factory Store, BCBGMAXAZRIA, Brooks Brothers 183 RETAIL Factory Store, Calvin Klein Company Store, Coach Factory Store, Reading 476 Cole Haan Outlet, Diesel, DKNY Company Store, Elie Tahari Outlet, 422 GLA (sq. ft.) 549,000; 150 stores Forever 21, Gap Factory Store, GUESS Factory Store, J.Crew Factory, 76 95 222 Sanatoga
    [Show full text]
  • Cape May County Transportation Study
    Cape May County Transportation Study Prepared by: Cape May County Planning Department 4 Moore Road Cape may Court House, New Jersey 08210 www.capemaycountygov.net 2006 Cover: Rendering of Proposed Middle Thorofare Bridge Replacement, Ocean Drive (Co. Rd. 621) Lower Township. Cape May County Transportation Plan 2006 CAPE MAY COUNTY PLANNING BOARD Resolution Number 03-06 ADOPTING THE CAPE MAY COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLAN Whereas, the County of Cape May seeks to provide state-of-the-art transportation facilities for the convenience and safety of its residents and visitors; and Whereas, it is necessary to provide a Transportation Plan to meet the current and future transportation needs of the County and to satisfy Federal and State planning requirements; and Whereas, Cape May County has prepared said plan addressing these issues and wishes to adopt this plan as the Transportation Element of the Cape May County Comprehensive Plan; and Whereas, prior to the adoption of any component or amendment of a County Comprehensive Plan a public hearing must be held in accordance with NJSA 40:27-4; and Whereas, on September 19, 2006 the Cape May County Planning Board held such a public hearing and listened to and addressed the concerns of the public regarding the plan. Now Therefore Be It Resolved by the Cape May County Planning Board that the Cape May County Transportation Plan is hereby adopted as the Transportation Element of the Cape May County Comprehensive Plan; and Now Therefore Be It Further Resolved, that in accordance with the provisions of NJSA 40:27-4, attested copies of this plan shall be certified to the Cape May County Board of Chosen Freeholders, the Cape May County Park Commission, and the Municipal Clerks of all municipalities in the County.
    [Show full text]
  • 6909 Program 4/7/09 4:19 PM Page 1
    6909 Program 4/7/09 4:19 PM Page 1 AMERICAN MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES APIC EFFECTIVE PAIN SOUTHERN NEW JERSEY CHAPTER CAREONE, MANAGEMENT FOR THE A SENIOR CARE COMPANY CENTRAL JERSEY CHAPTER SUBACUTE NURSING HOME PATIENT OF THE NATIONAL GERONTOLOGICAL NURSING ASSOCIATION PROGRAM DATE: June 9, 2009 GENESIS HEALTHCARE SPONSORED BY: NJ Local Area Network for Excellence (NJ LANE) HEALTH CARE ASSOCIATION OF NEW JERSEY LOCATION: Conference Center at NJHA HEALTHCARE QUALITY STRATEGIES, INC. 760 Alexander Road, Princeton, New Jersey HOSPICE OF NEW JERSEY WHO SHOULD ATTEND NEW JERSEY ACTIVITY PROFESSIONALS ASSOCIATION Medical directors, directors of nursing, administrators and members of the interdisciplinary care team in nursing home settings. NEW JERSEY AMERICAN MEDICAL DIRECTORS ASSOCIATION OBJECTIVES NEW JERSEY ASSOCIATION Based on the publicly reported nursing home quality measures, patients who have short stays in subacute set- OF HOMES AND SERVICES tings have very high prevalence of pain. Frequently, these patients come to the facility following an acute episode FOR THE AGING during which they have had surgery. They often have a history of chronic pain along with a new status of post- NEW JERSEY CHAPTER surgical pain. In a 2008 survey conducted by the NJ LANE, nursing home providers reported that pain man- OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF HEALTH CARE agement in this population is challenging and is an area in which they need more information and better strate- ADMINISTRATORS gies. This full-day session will provide an in-depth exploration of federal and state regulations governing pain management, MDS coding of pain, physiological and cultural aspects of pain, ethical issues and pharmacolog- NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH ic and non-pharmacologic methods of treatment.
    [Show full text]
  • Toll Pricing and Its Relationship to Travel Demand, Elasticity, and Distribution of Economic Activities for Hampton Roads, Virginia
    TOLL PRICING AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO TRAVEL DEMAND, ELASTICITY, AND DISTRIBUTION OF ECONOMIC ACTIVITIES FOR HAMPTON ROADS, VIRGINIA Salvatore J. Bellomo, Alan M. Voorhees and Associates, Inc. This paper presents the effect of toll pricing on travel demand and distri­ bution of economic activities in the Hampton Roads area of southeastern Virginia. A methodology is described that projects simultaneously travel demand and distribution of population and employment. The 1°esults o.r test­ ing future alternative conditions for crossing Hampton Roads are used to illustrate the impact of changes in new facilities and toll pricing on travel demand, average vehicular trip length, trip purpose, and distribution of future population and employment. The findings in this paper offer an alter­ native method to the projection of a single-demand estimate used in most urban area transportation studies. The consideration for the elasticity of demand with respect to price described in this paper could be applied to the analysis of major facilities within urbanized areas or between major regions that are considering toll-pricing policies or broader transport-pricing policies. •PRICING POLICIES can be used by the transportation and urban planner to control travel demand and the distribution of economic activities. Roth (1) pointed out qualita­ tively how the road pricing of congestion could be used to reduce vehicular travel de­ mand. Golenburg and Keith (2) illustrated quantitatively through a simulation technique how the price on parking could be used to r educe automobile travel demand in Canberra, Australia. The purpose of this paper is to present quantitatively the effect of future toll-pricing schemes on the demand for highway travel and the distribution of economic activities in the Hampton Roads area of southeastern Virginia shown in Figure 1.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 ANNUAL REPORT ‘BRIDGES AS ART’ Ì Northampton Street Toll-Supported Bridge TABLE of CONTENTS
    2019 ANNUAL REPORT ‘BRIDGES AS ART’ Ì Northampton Street Toll-Supported Bridge TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR’S MESSAGE ........................................... 3 MAP/MISSION ......................................................................... 4 COMMISSIONERS/ABOUT THE COMMISSION ............................ 5 STAFF ..................................................................................... 6 BRIDGES AS ART ..................................................................... 9 SCUDDER FALLS .....................................................................12 OLD SCUDDER FALLS BRIDGE ..................................................26 OTHER PROJECTS ..................................................................38 YEAR IN REVIEW .....................................................................44 STATEMENTS OF NET POSITION .............................................51 TRAFFIC COUNTS ...................................................................52 Ì Centre Bridge-Stockton Toll-Supported Bridge 1 PHOTOGRAPHY/GRAPHICS CREDITS A variety of in-house, amateur, contractor, mass media, and governmental/institutional photographic/graphic resources were used to publish this annual report. Aside from the Bridges as Art depictions, contributors to this report included: Ron Saari; Trenton Evening Times; Justin Bowers; Trenton Public Library’s Trentoniana Room; McCormick Taylor; Jed Varju; Stokes Creative Group; AECOM; Joseph Jingoli & Son, Inc.; Trumbull Corporation; Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc.; Gannett Fleming;
    [Show full text]