DOCSLIB.ORG

Inquiry on Growing the Suburbs: Infrastructure and Business Development in Outer Suburban Melbourne

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Inquiry on Growing the Suburbs: Infrastructure and Business Development in Outer Suburban Melbourne OUTER SUBURBAN/INTERFACE SERVICES AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE INQUIRY ON GROWING THE SUBURBS: INFRASTRUCTURE AND BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT IN OUTER SUBURBAN MELBOURNE June 2013 ORDERED TO BE PRINTED Victorian Government Printer Parliamentary Paper PP 236, Session 2010-13 Inquiry on Growing the Suburbs The Committee records its appreciation to everyone who has contributed to the Inquiry through the submission process and at the Committee’s public hearings; they are listed in the Appendices. The report was prepared by the Committee’s Research Officers, Mr Scott Martin and Ms Charlotte Frew under the direction of the Committee’s Executive Officer, Mr Nathan Bunt. Administrative support was provided by Ms Michelle Summerhill and Ms Natalie-Mai Holmes. Outer Suburban/Interface Services and Development Committee (2013) Inquiry on Growing the Suburbs: Infrastructure and Business Development in Outer Suburban Melbourne Front Cover Images: Top left: Sign for Boxpark Pop-up Mall in Shoreditch, London, United Kingdom. Courtesy of: Mrs Jan Kronberg, Chair, Outer Suburban/Interface Services and Development Committee. Top centre: Aerial view of suburban Vancouver. Courtesy of: Mrs Jan Kronberg, Chair, Outer Suburban/Interface Services and Development Committee. Top right: Image of scientists working in a laboratory. Courtesy of: Mono Design. Centre left: The Hub co-working space in Melbourne. Courtesy of: Paul Jeffers, ‘Adults who work hard should play hard’; The Age, image 20 of 23. Centre right: Volumes café and street scape in Eltham, Shire of Nillumbik, Melbourne. Courtesy of: Mrs Jan Kronberg, Chair, Outer Suburban/Interface Services and Development Committee. Bottom left: Docklands Light Rail System, London, United Kingdom. Courtesy of: Mrs Jan Kronberg, Chair, Outer Suburban/Interface Services and Development Committee. Bottom right: Epping wholesale fruit and vegetable market, Epping, Melbourne. Courtesy of: Major Projects Victoria. Back Cover Image: Metropolitan Melbourne Network Development Plan: Rail Image courtesy of (c) Public Transport Victoria 2012, All Rights Reserved. ISBN: 978-0-9808053-1-4 Cover Design: Mono Design Printer: On-Demand Outer Suburban/Interface Services and Development Committee Parliament House, Spring Street East Melbourne, Victoria 3002 Phone: +613 8682 2826 Fax: +613 8682 2858 Email: [email protected] Website: www.parliament.vic.gov.au/osisdc Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................................................................ I COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP ........................................................................................................................... VII FUNCTIONS OF THE COMMITTEE ...............................................................................................................................VIII CONTACT DETAILS .................................................................................................................................................VIII TERMS OF REFERENCE .................................................................................................................................... IX EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................... XI CHAIR’S FOREWORD ................................................................................................................................... XVII LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................................................... XXIII LIST OF FIGURES .......................................................................................................................................... XXV ACRONYMS ............................................................................................................................................... XXVII GLOSSARY .................................................................................................................................................. XXXI TABLE OF FINDINGS ................................................................................................................................ XXXVII TABLE OF RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................................................... XXXIX PART A: INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 45 CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 45 1.1 PURPOSE AND CONTEXT OF THE INQUIRY ....................................................................................................... 45 1.2 TERMS OF REFERENCE ............................................................................................................................... 47 1.3 CONDUCT OF THE INQUIRY ......................................................................................................................... 48 1.3.1 Submissions ..................................................................................................................................... 48 1.3.2 Public hearings and briefings .......................................................................................................... 48 Melbourne public hearings ....................................................................................................................................... 48 Outer suburban public hearings ................................................................................................................................ 48 Interstate study tour to Perth and Adelaide ............................................................................................................. 49 Overseas study tour .................................................................................................................................................. 49 1.3.3 Background research ...................................................................................................................... 50 1.4 WHAT IS INFRASTRUCTURE? ....................................................................................................................... 50 1.5 WHAT IS BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT? ............................................................................................................. 51 1.6 WHAT IS OUTER SUBURBAN MELBOURNE? .................................................................................................... 52 CHAPTER 2: PROFILES OF MELBOURNE’S INTERFACE COUNCILS ................................................................... 55 2.1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................ 55 2.2 CARDINIA ............................................................................................................................................... 56 2.2.1 Residents’ place of work ................................................................................................................. 56 2.2.2 Residents’ main method of travel to work ...................................................................................... 57 2.2.3 Skills profile ..................................................................................................................................... 57 2.3 CASEY .................................................................................................................................................... 58 2.3.1 Residents’ place of work ................................................................................................................. 58 2.3.2 Residents’ main method of travel to work ...................................................................................... 59 i Inquiry on Growing the Suburbs 2.3.3 Skills profile ..................................................................................................................................... 59 2.4 HUME ................................................................................................................................................... 59 2.4.1 Residents’ place of work ................................................................................................................. 59 2.4.2 Residents’ main method of travel to work ...................................................................................... 59 2.4.3 Skills profile ..................................................................................................................................... 60 2.5 MELTON ................................................................................................................................................ 61 2.5.1 Residents’ place of work ................................................................................................................. 61 2.5.2 Residents’ main method of travel to work ...................................................................................... 62 2.5.3 Skills profile ..................................................................................................................................... 62 2.5 MITCHELL ..............................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Public Transport Partnerships
    PUBLIC TRANSPORT PARTNERSHIPS An Overview of Passenger Rail Franchising in Victoria March 2005 Department of Infrastructure PUBLIC TRANSPORT PARTNERSHIPS An Overview of Passenger Rail Franchising in Victoria March 2005 Public Transport Division Department of Infrastructure © State of Victoria 2005 Published by Public Transport Division Department of Infrastructure 80 Collins Street, Melbourne March 2005 www.doi.vic.gov.au This publication is copyright. No part may be reproduced by any process except in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. Authorised by the Victorian Government, 80 Collins Street, Melbourne. Minister’s Foreword In February 2004, after the failure of the original privatisation framework, the Victorian Government entered into new franchise agreements with Melbourne’s public transport companies, Yarra Trams and Connex. These partnership agreements find the balance between government support for public transport in Melbourne and the operational expertise provided by experienced private rail operators. Almost one year on, the new arrangements are running smoothly, providing stability across the public transport system and giving a solid foundation for a range of improvements in service delivery. Some of the other benefits to passengers that stem from these agreements include: • Additional front-line customer service staff; • Increased security patrols; • Improved driver training programs; • All night New Year’s Eve services; • Additional rolling stock; and • Improved standards for the upkeep of transport facilities. The key themes of this summary report include the background to the failure of the original contracts, the renegotiations, the nature of the new partnership agreements and the challenges of the refranchising process. You can obtain the latest information about Melbourne’s public transport by visiting www.doi.vic.gov.au/transport I commend this report to you.
    [Show full text]
  • Bus Service Reform in Melbourne – the Last 5 Years Peter Parker
    Institute of Transport Studies, Monash University World Transit Research World Transit Research 9-1-2011 Bus service reform in Melbourne – the last 5 years Peter Parker Follow this and additional works at: http://www.worldtransitresearch.info/research Recommended Citation Parker, P. (2011). Bus service reform in Melbourne - the last 5 years. Conference paper delivered at the 34th Australasian Transport Research Forum (ATRF) Proceedings held on 28 - 30 September 2011 in Adelaide, Australia. This Conference Paper is brought to you for free and open access by World Transit Research. It has been accepted for inclusion in World Transit Research by an authorized administrator of World Transit Research. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Australasian Transport Research Forum 2011 28 – 30 September 2011, Adelaide, Australia Publications website: www.patrec.org/atrf.aspx Bus service reform in Melbourne – the last 5 years Peter Parker1 1 Metlink Melbourne, Level 8, 575 Bourke Street, Melbourne, 3000 Email for correspondence: [email protected] Abstract After fifteen years of little change, Melbourne’s bus services have altered significantly in the last five years. Underpinned by policy that supports greater public transport use, reform was driven by three major government programs; SmartBus, minimum standards upgrades and local area service reviews. This paper briefly compares the distribution of each service initiative. Minimum standards upgrades were most widespread, benefiting many middle and outer suburbs. Middle suburbs gained most from SmartBus, especially the City of Manningham where it operates on city as well as orbital routes. And the service reviews were most influential in fringe areas to the west, north and south east.
    [Show full text]
  • Transporting Melbourne's Recovery
    Transporting Melbourne’s Recovery Immediate policy actions to get Melbourne moving January 2021 Executive Summary The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted how Victorians make decisions for when, where and how they travel. Lockdown periods significantly reduced travel around metropolitan Melbourne and regional Victoria due to travel restrictions and work-from-home directives. As Victoria enters the recovery phase towards a COVID Normal, our research suggests that these travel patterns will shift again – bringing about new transport challenges. Prior to the pandemic, the transport network was struggling to meet demand with congested roads and crowded public transport services. The recovery phase adds additional complexity to managing the network, as the Victorian Government will need to balance competing objectives such as transmission risks, congestion and stimulating greater economic activity. Governments across the world are working rapidly to understand how to cater for the shifting transport demands of their cities – specifically, a disruption to entire transport systems that were not designed with such health and biosecurity challenges in mind. Infrastructure Victoria’s research is intended to assist the Victorian Government in making short-term policy decisions to balance the safety and performance of the transport system with economic recovery. The research is also designed to inform decision-making by industry and businesses as their workforces return to a COVID Normal. It focuses on how the transport network may handle returning demand and provides options to overcome the crowding and congestion effects, while also balancing the health risks posed by potential local transmission of the virus. Balancing these impacts is critical to fostering confidence in public transport travel, thereby underpinning and sustaining Melbourne’s economic recovery.
    [Show full text]
  • Upscaling the Neighborhood
    Upscaling the Neighborhood Nicole Stelle Garnett* Introduction................................................................................................................................................... 1 I. The Inner-Suburban “Problem” ........................................................................................................... 6 II. The Inner Ring as a Distributional Problem: The Regionalist Response ............................................ 9 III. The Inner-Ring as an Aesthetic Problem: The Land-Use Planning Response .............................. 11 IV. Upscaling in Action: A Cautionary Tale ........................................................................................ 18 A. Rule-of-Law Concerns .................................................................................................................... 19 B. Compliance Costs ........................................................................................................................... 24 C. The Trouble with the Transect ........................................................................................................ 26 D. Imposition of a Uniform Urban Aesthetic ...................................................................................... 28 E. The Lure of the Wrecking Ball ........................................................................................................ 32 V. The Political Economy of Inner-Suburban Land Use Regulation....................................................... 34 Conclusion .................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Demographic Transformation of Inner City Auckland
    New Zealand Population Review, 35:55-74. Copyright © 2009 Population Association of New Zealand The Demographic Transformation of Inner City Auckland WARDLOW FRIESEN * Abstract The inner city of Auckland, comprising the inner suburbs and the Central Business District (CBD) has undergone a process of reurbanisation in recent years. Following suburbanisation, redevelopment and motorway construction after World War II, the population of the inner city declined significantly. From the 1970s onwards some inner city suburbs started to become gentrified and while this did not result in much population increase, it did change the characteristics of inner city populations. However, global and local forces converged in the 1990s to trigger a rapid repopulation of the CBD through the development of apartments, resulting in a great increase in population numbers and in new populations of local and international students as well as central city workers and others. he transformation of Central Auckland since the mid-twentieth century has taken a number of forms. The suburbs encircling the TCentral Business District (CBD) have seen overall population decline resulting from suburbanisation, as well as changing demographic and ethnic characteristics resulting from a range of factors, and some areas have been transformed into desirable, even elite, neighbourhoods. Towards the end of the twentieth century and into the twenty first century, a related but distinctive transformation has taken place in the CBD, with the rapid construction of commercial and residential buildings and a residential population growth rate of 1000 percent over a fifteen year period. While there are a number of local government and real estate reports on this phenomenon, there has been relatively little academic attention to its nature * School of Environment, The University of Auckland.
    [Show full text]
  • Housing in the Evolving American Suburb Cover, from Top: Daybreak, South Jordan, Utah
    Housing in the Evolving American Suburb Cover, from top: Daybreak, South Jordan, Utah. Daybreak, Utah St. Charles, Waldorf, Maryland. St. Charles Companies Inglenook, Carmel, Indiana. Ross Chapin Architects, Land Development & Building Inc. © 2016 by the Urban Land Institute 2001 L Street, NW Suite 200 Washington, DC 20036 Printed in the United States of America. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without written permission of the publisher. Recommended bibliographic listing: Urban Land Institute. Housing in the Evolving American Suburb. Washington, DC: Urban Land Institute, 2016. ISBN: 978-0-87420-396-7 Housing in the Evolving American Suburb About the Urban Land Institute The mission of the Urban Land Institute is to provide leadership in the responsible use of land and in creating and sustaining thriving communities worldwide. ULI is committed to n Bringing together leaders from across the fields of real estate and land use policy to exchange best practices and serve community needs; n Fostering collaboration within and beyond ULI’s membership through mentoring, dialogue, and problem solving; n Exploring issues of urbanization, conservation, regeneration, land use, capital formation, and sustainable development; n Advancing land use policies and design practices that respect the uniqueness of both the built and natural environments; n Sharing knowledge through education, applied research, publishing, and electronic media; and n Sustaining a diverse global network of local practice and advisory efforts that address current and future challenges. Established in 1936, the ULI today has more than 39,000 members worldwide, representing the entire spectrum of the land use and development disciplines.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards Sustainable Urban Spatial Structure: Does Decentralization Reduce Commuting Times?
    sustainability Article Towards Sustainable Urban Spatial Structure: Does Decentralization Reduce Commuting Times? Chunil Kim 1 and Choongik Choi 2,* 1 Housing Urban Finance Institute, Korea Housing & Urban Guarantee Corporation (HUG), BIFC, 40 Munhyeon-geumyung-ro, Nam-gu, Busan 48400, Korea; [email protected] 2 Department of Public Administration, Kangwon National University, 1, Gangwondaehak-gil, Chuncheon-si, Gangwon-do 24341, Korea * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +82-33-250-6813 Received: 31 December 2018; Accepted: 7 February 2019; Published: 15 February 2019 Abstract: This paper contributes to the existing debate on the co-location hypothesis, by devising a proximity measure and controlling for a set of other urban form measures. Utilizing the LEHD (Longitudinal Employer–Household Dynamics) Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES) data that provide the number of jobs by a finer geography, this paper measured the degree of centralization, proximity, and job–housing mismatch. Multiple regression analysis revealed that the job–worker proximity leads to a shorter commuting time. In addition, the results focusing on suburban areas revealed that the impact of the job–worker imbalance and the impact of job–worker mismatch on the commuting time are greater in the suburb in comparison with the city center. Keywords: urban spatial structure; commuting; job–housing ratio; floating catchment area 1. Introduction The evolution of spatial structure plays a significant role in shaping interactions among decision-making agents in cities. The development of transportation technologies transformed old port city centers and connected inland areas to each other. As the railway system came into existence, firms that had been locked in the port center could move along the rail lines.
    [Show full text]
  • 3718938-V8-AUG06 PC CITY of MELBOURNE TRANSPORT
    Page 7 of 185 Attachment 1 Agenda Item 5.1 Planning Committee 1 August 2006 City of Melbourne Transport Strategy 2020: Moving People & Freight July 2006 Page 8 of 185 TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD ..........................................................................................................................................................3 1. INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................................................5 VISION FOR AN INTEGRATED AND SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORT SYSTEM ............................................... 5 WHY DO WE NEED AN INTEGRATED AND SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORT SYSTEM?.................................. 6 THE AREAS FOR ACTION............................................................................................................................ 10 IMPLEMENTATION ....................................................................................................................................... 11 THE POLICY CONTEXT................................................................................................................................ 12 2. GETTING TO THE CITY ....................................................................................................................15 WHAT WE WANT FOR 2020: OUR VISION OF A SUSTAINABLE AND INTEGRATED TRANSPORT NETWORK..................................................................................................................................................... 15 METROPOLITAN VEHICLE ACCESS
    [Show full text]
  • Transport Strategy Refresh
    Transport Strategy refresh Background paper Public Transport Network March 2018 Dr John Stone (University of Melbourne) Dr Ian Woodcock (RMIT) 1 This report has been prepared by Dr John Stone (University of Melbourne) and Dr Ian Woodcock (RMIT) as independent advice for the City of Melbourne. The aim of the report is to encourage public conversation and to inform the City of Melbourne’s forthcoming Transport Strategy refresh. 2 Contents 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 5 2. Current performance ........................................................................................................................... 6 2.1. Mode share ................................................................................................................................... 6 2.2. Overcrowding ................................................................................................................................ 9 2.3. Reliability and speed ..................................................................................................................... 9 3. Better public transport for the City of Melbourne: Key issues in brief ............................................... 10 4. Public transport issues & options ...................................................................................................... 11 4.1. Significant growth is expected in public transport demand ........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Sparks April
    -2- No. 168 May - June 2021 EDITORIAL Welcome to another edition of Sparks. Some of the most important recent news in the NSW Railways was the overwhelming vote in a management organised ballot about varying existing EBA's, against the NSW Govt's Public Sector Wage Freeze associated 0.3% p.a. wage rise in Sydney Trains and NSW Sparks Trains. However there have been no moves by the RTBU hierarchy to wage an industrial campaign to defeat the wage freeze such as the holding of union mass meetings and the development of a log of claims. In this edition of Sparks we are presenting some ideas to get THE RANK-AND-FILE TRANSPORT WORKERS’ PAPER the campaign rolling such as some proposals for a log of claims. With the end of the holiday period and the COVID-19 pandemic lock downs and restrictions, sectors of business are desperate to re-coop profits so a favourable period exists for an industrial campaign. (See IT’S TIME TO MELT GLADY’S WAGE article page 3.) In Sydney Buses new revelations have come to hand about massive wage cuts by Transit Systems management in Region 6 affecting ex-STA drivers following recent roster FREEZE WITH DIRECT ACTION TO changes. These brutal attacks highlight the importance of fighting privatisation with direct action. While exposing the fraudulent response of the RTBU Bus Division officials SECURE WAGES & CONDITIONS with their bogus talk of a threatened 48 hour strike and the holding of a staff meeting rather than a union mass meeting on the privatisation issue to head off any grass roots push for an industrial campaign.
    [Show full text]
  • TTF Rapid Buses, Road & Rail (Melbourne Airport)
    RAPID BUSES, ROAD AND RAIL GROUND TRANSPORT SOLUTIONS TO MEET MELBOURNE AIRPORT’S PASSENGER GROWTH TO 2050 JULY 2013 Membership of Tourism & Transport Forum Tourism & Transport Forum (TTF) is a national, member-funded CEO forum, advocating the public policy interests of 200 leading corporations and institutions in the Australian tourism, transport, aviation and investment sectors For further information please contact: Justin Wastnage | Director, Aviation Policy | [email protected] Martin Gray | Policy Officer |[email protected] Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................... 4 Ensuring transport choice for Melbourne Airport ................................................................ 4 SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS ....................................................................... 6 List of figures ........................................................................................................................................................... 6 MELBOURNE AIRPORT – THE NEXT 30 YEARS ............................................................ 7 Forecast demand .................................................................................................................... 7 ACCESSING MELBOURNE AIRPORT .......................................................................... 8 Internal airport transport ......................................................................................................... 8 Broader road network ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Grampians and Barwon South West Region Passenger Services Cost & Feasibility Study
    GRAMPIANS AND BARWON SOUTH WEST REGION PASSENGER SERVICES COST & FEASIBILITY STUDY FINAL REPORT March 2017 John Hearsch Consulting Pty Ltd 2 Steering Committee Peter Brown, CEO, Horsham Rural City Council Andrew Evans, CEO, Ararat Rural City Council Michael McCarthy, Director Shire Futures, Southern Grampians Shire Council Maree McNeilly, Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources Angela Daraxaglou, Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources Chris Banger, Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources Jozef Vass, Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources Study Co-ordinator: Susan Surridge, Horsham Rural City Council Study Team John Hearsch, Study Director Dr Bill Russell Peter Don Participating Councils Ararat Rural City Council Northern Grampians Shire Glenelg Shire Southern Grampian Shire Hindmarsh Shire West Wimmera Shire Horsham Rural City Council Yarriambiack Shire Grampians and Barwon South West Passenger Services Cost & Feasibility Study– John Hearsch Consulting Pty Ltd, Page 2 3 GRAMPIANS AND BARWON SOUTH WEST REGION PASSENGER SERVICES COST & FEASIBILITY STUDY Table of Contents Executive Summary .......................................................................................................... 6 Findings ............................................................................................................................ 8 Recommendations ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]