The Garrison Study Unit

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Garrison Study Unit The Garrison Study Unit........................................................................................6.1 Description of the Garrison Study Unit.............................................................6.1 Physiography ..................................................................................................6.1 Drainage ........................................................................................................ 6.6 Climate........................................................................................................... 6.6 Landforms and Soils.......................................................................................6.7 Flora and Fauna .............................................................................................6.7 Other Natural Resource Potential................................................................. 6.8 Overview of Previous Archeological Work ....................................................... 6.8 Inventory Projects ......................................................................................... 6.8 Test Excavation Projects ............................................................................. 6.47 Major Excavation Projects .......................................................................... 6.54 Other Work.................................................................................................. 6.60 Cultural/Temporal Affiliation......................................................................... 6.62 Paleo-Indian Period ........................................................................................ 6.63 Paleo-Environmental Modeling.................................................................. 6.63 Settlement Behavior.................................................................................... 6.63 Native Subsistence Practices....................................................................... 6.64 Technologies................................................................................................ 6.64 Artifact Styles .............................................................................................. 6.65 Regional Interaction.................................................................................... 6.65 Historic Preservation Goals, Priorities, and Strategies .............................. 6.65 Plains Archaic Period...................................................................................... 6.66 Paleo-Environmental Modeling.................................................................. 6.66 Cultural Chronology .................................................................................... 6.66 Settlement Behavior.................................................................................... 6.67 Native Subsistence Practices....................................................................... 6.67 Technologies................................................................................................ 6.67 Artifact Styles .............................................................................................. 6.68 Regional Interaction.................................................................................... 6.68 Historic Preservation Goals, Priorities, and Strategies .............................. 6.69 Plains Woodland Period ................................................................................. 6.69 Paleo-Environmental Modeling.................................................................. 6.69 Cultural Chronology .................................................................................... 6.70 Native Subsistence Practices....................................................................... 6.70 Technologies.................................................................................................6.71 Artifact Styles ...............................................................................................6.71 Regional Interaction.................................................................................... 6.73 Historic Preservation Goals, Priorities, and Strategies .............................. 6.72 Historic Preservation Goals, Priorities, and Strategies .............................. 6.73 Plains Village Period ....................................................................................... 6.73 Paleo-Environmental Modeling.................................................................. 6.74 Cultural Chronology .................................................................................... 6.74 Settlement Behavior.................................................................................... 6.74 Native Subsistence Practices........................................................................6.75 Technologies.................................................................................................6.75 Artifact Styles ...............................................................................................6.75 Regional Interaction.................................................................................... 6.76 Historic Preservation Goals, Priorities, and Strategies .............................. 6.76 Equestrian/Fur Trade Period ......................................................................... 6.76 Paleo-Environmental Modeling.................................................................. 6.76 Cultural Chronology .....................................................................................6.77 Settlement Behavior.....................................................................................6.77 Native Subsistence Practices....................................................................... 6.78 Technologies................................................................................................ 6.78 Artifact Styles .............................................................................................. 6.78 Regional Interaction.................................................................................... 6.78 Historic Preservation Goals, Priorities, and Strategies .............................. 6.79 Figure 6.1: Map of the Garrison Study Unit......................................................... 6.2 Figure 6.1A: Shaded relief map of the Garrison Study Unit. ............................... 6.3 Figure 6.2: Ceramic vessel and body sherd photos, Mondrian Tree site (32MZ58); f: cord impressed vessel; g: cord roughened vessel (from C. Johnson 1983:9.11). ............................................................................................................................. 6.72 Table 6.1: Townships in the Garrison Study Unit. ............................................... 6.4 Table 6.2: Feature Type by Landform for Archeological Sites in the Garrison Study Unit, 13-Sept-2007. .................................................................................... 6.9 Table 6.3: A Brief Overview of the Large-scale Class III Inventories Conducted in the Garrison River Study Unit (5-Sept-2007)..................................................... 6.11 Table 6.4: Inventory Projects in the Garrison Study Unit, 5-Sept-2007............6.12 Table 6.5: Test Excavation Projects in the Garrison Study Unit, 5-Sept-2007. .6.51 Table 6.6: Major Excavation Projects in the Garrison Study Unit, 5-Sept-2007. ............................................................................................................................. 6.58 Table 6.7: Other Work in the Garrison Study Unit, 5-Sept-2007...................... 6.60 Table 6.8: Cultural/Temporal Affiliation of Archeological Resources in the Garrison Study Unit, 13-Sept-2007.................................................................... 6.62 The Garrison Study Unit Michael L. Gregg and Amy Bleier 2008 The Missouri valley in North Dakota upriver from Garrison dam to the Montana border has witnessed all of the state’s prehistory. Diagnostic artifacts are reported dating from Clovis times. The long east-west segment of the valley has vast areas of north-facing wooded slopes and draws which provide cover for an abundance of game animals and furbearers. This setting, including the river, tributary stream valleys, and upland grasslands, may have offered the most reliable resource base in the state for hunting and gathering peoples. Description of the Garrison Study Unit The Garrison Study Unit (GSU) is located in the northwestern part of North Dakota. Montana and Saskatchewan border it to the west and north. It covers of an area of 8,063 mi2, comprising all or parts of eight counties: Burke, Divide, Dunn, McKenzie, McLean, Mercer, Mountrail, Ward, and Williams. Figures 6.1 and 6.1A are maps illustrating the Study Unit. A complete listing of townships included in the Study Unit is presented in Table 6.1. Physiography The Study Unit lies within the glaciated Missouri Plateau Subsection of the Missouri Plateau Section of the Great Plains Physiographic Province (Fenneman 1931; Hunt 1974). Missouri River valley portions of the Study Unit are included in the Missouri River Trench District. But most of the Study Unit is made up of Missouri Coteau and Coteau Slope terrain. Land outside of the Trench beyond the right bank of the river is part of an unnamed district of the Glaciated Missouri Plateau Subsection (Fenneman 1931; Wyckoff and Kuehn 1983:Figure 4.11). Topographically, the Coteau Slope is characterized by gently rolling hills dissected by numerous
Recommended publications
  • Archeological and Bioarcheological Resources of the Northern Plains Edited by George C
    Tri-Services Cultural Resources Research Center USACERL Special Report 97/2 December 1996 U.S. Department of Defense Legacy Resource Management Program U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Construction Engineering Research Laboratory Archeological and Bioarcheological Resources of the Northern Plains edited by George C. Frison and Robert C. Mainfort, with contributions by George C. Frison, Dennis L. Toom, Michael L. Gregg, John Williams, Laura L. Scheiber, George W. Gill, James C. Miller, Julie E. Francis, Robert C. Mainfort, David Schwab, L. Adrien Hannus, Peter Winham, David Walter, David Meyer, Paul R. Picha, and David G. Stanley A Volume in the Central and Northern Plains Archeological Overview Arkansas Archeological Survey Research Series No. 47 1996 Arkansas Archeological Survey Fayetteville, Arkansas 1996 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Archeological and bioarcheological resources of the Northern Plains/ edited by George C. Frison and Robert C. Mainfort; with contributions by George C. Frison [et al.] p. cm. — (Arkansas Archeological Survey research series; no. 47 (USACERL special report; 97/2) “A volume in the Central and Northern Plains archeological overview.” Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 1-56349-078-1 (alk. paper) 1. Indians of North America—Great Plains—Antiquities. 2. Indians of North America—Anthropometry—Great Plains. 3. Great Plains—Antiquities. I. Frison, George C. II. Mainfort, Robert C. III. Arkansas Archeological Survey. IV. Series. V. Series: USA-CERL special report: N-97/2. E78.G73A74 1996 96-44361 978’.01—dc21 CIP Abstract The 12,000 years of human occupation in the Northwestern Great Plains states of Montana, Wyoming, North Dakota, and South Dakota is reviewed here.
    [Show full text]
  • An Ethnohistoric and Archaeological Investigation of Late Fort Ancient Bifacial Endscrapers
    The College of Wooster Open Works Senior Independent Study Theses 2020 Tools of the Trade: An Ethnohistoric and Archaeological Investigation of Late Fort Ancient Bifacial Endscrapers Kevin Andrew Rolph The College of Wooster, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://openworks.wooster.edu/independentstudy Recommended Citation Rolph, Kevin Andrew, "Tools of the Trade: An Ethnohistoric and Archaeological Investigation of Late Fort Ancient Bifacial Endscrapers" (2020). Senior Independent Study Theses. Paper 9005. This Senior Independent Study Thesis Exemplar is brought to you by Open Works, a service of The College of Wooster Libraries. It has been accepted for inclusion in Senior Independent Study Theses by an authorized administrator of Open Works. For more information, please contact [email protected]. © Copyright 2020 Kevin Andrew Rolph Tools of the Trade: An Ethnohistoric and Archaeological Investigation of Late Fort Ancient Bifacial Endscrapers By Kevin A. Rolph A Thesis Submitted in Fulfillment of the Requirements of Independent Study In Archaeology at The College of Wooster Archaeology 451 Dr. Olivia Navarro- Farr March 23, 2020 Abstract The arrival of Europeans to the New World forever changed the social and economic landscapes of Native Peoples who occupied the continents. Colonial institutions profited off the land and those who occupied it. One institution that exemplified this was the Fur Trade. Throughout the North and Northeast colonies, European nations acquired furs from a variety of mammals to meet the trans-Atlantic demand. To maximize profits in the New World many European colonizers turned to Native peoples to aid in their economic endeavors. Native Americans employed trade routes and knowledge of the land to their advantage in the new economic landscape.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Submissions
    CULTURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT Information for Parks, Federal Agencies, Indian Tribes, States, Local Governments, and the Private Sector VOLUME 19 NO. 9 1996 CRM SUPPLEMENT National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Submissions he National Register of Historic California, or Usonian Houses by Frank Lloyd Places has been accepting multiple Wright, 1945-1960, in Iowa, contain valuable infor­ property nominations since 1977. mation that can be used in other states. To date, over one third of the Many cover documents are worthy of publica­ 66,300 National Register listings tion. The National Park Service encourages nominat­ are parTt of multiple property submissions. The ing authorities and others to seek ways to have them National Register multiple property nomination is published for scholars and the public to use. The designed to be a flexible tool for recording written information contained in them can also be used in statements of historic context and associated prop­ developing travel itineraries, World Wide Web sites, erty types and to provide a framework for evaluating for walking tours, interpretative projects, and other the significance of a related group of historic proper­ public education initiatives. ties. The statement of historic context is a written National Register Bulletin 16B: How to narrative that describes the unifying thematic frame­ Complete the National Register Multiple Property work; it must be developed in sufficient depth to Documentation Form (issued in 1991) explains in support the history, the relationships, and the detail how to nominate groups of related significant importance of the properties to be considered. A properties to the National Register. A video, The property type is a grouping of individual properties Multiple Property Approach, has been produced by characterized by common physical and/or associa­ the National Register.
    [Show full text]
  • “Unveiling the Past: Current Contributions to Pennsylvania Archaeology”
    1 The 90th Annual Meeting The Society for Pennsylvania Archaeology April 5-7, 2019 “Unveiling the Past: Current Contributions to Pennsylvania Archaeology” Hosted by the Mon-Yough Chapter #3 Ramada Inn by Wyndham Uniontown, Pennsylvania 2 3 The Society for Pennsylvania Archaeology, Inc. Officers Jonathan Libbon …………………………………….………………..President Jonathan A. Burns………………………………….…..First Vice-President Thomas Glover ………………………………………Second Vice-President Roger Moeller…………………………………………………………………Editor Judy Duritsa……………………………………………………………..Secretary Ken Burkett………………………………………………………………Treasurer Roger Moeller……………………………………………………….…Webmaster Directors Susanne Haney Angela Jaillett-Wentling Paul Nevin Valerie Perazio Mon-Yough Chapter #3 Officers John P. Nass, Jr. ………………………………………………………..President Susan Toia………………………………………………………….Vice-President Carl Maurer………………………………………………………………..Treasurer Phil Shandorf……………..…………………………Corresponding Secretary Douglas Corwin………………………………………………….……..Webmaster 4 Location of meeting Rooms Hospitality Suite RAMADA INN FLOOR PLAN 5 Organizing Committee Program Chair: John P. Nass, Jr. Book Room: Donald Rados Hospitality Suite Arrangements: Bob Harris and Dwayne Santella Local Arrangements: Phil Shandorf Website: Douglas Corwin Registration: Carl Maurer All PAC and SPA sessions will be held at the Ramada Inn by Wyndham Uniontown, PA MEETING INFORMATION Please Note: Titles followed by an asterisk are student papers entered in the Fred Kinsey Competition. The PAC Board and Business Meeting on Friday morning will be held in the Appalachian Ridge and Laurel Ridge Room. SPA Board Meeting on Friday evening at 6:00 pm will be in the Appalachian Ridge and Laurel Ridge Rooms. Registration Table: The Oasis Area outside of the Book Room and Lounge near the pool. The General Business Meeting on Saturday morning at 8:00 am will be in the Appalachian Ridge and Laurel Ridge Rooms. The Hospitality Suite on Friday and Saturday evenings will be in the Managers Suite, Second Floor, Room 279.
    [Show full text]
  • Resources Pertaining to First Nations, Inuit, and Metis. Fifth Edition. INSTITUTION Manitoba Dept
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 400 143 RC 020 735 AUTHOR Bagworth, Ruth, Comp. TITLE Native Peoples: Resources Pertaining to First Nations, Inuit, and Metis. Fifth Edition. INSTITUTION Manitoba Dept. of Education and Training, Winnipeg. REPORT NO ISBN-0-7711-1305-6 PUB DATE 95 NOTE 261p.; Supersedes fourth edition, ED 350 116. PUB TYPE Reference Materials Bibliographies (131) EDRS PRICE MFO1 /PC11 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS American Indian Culture; American Indian Education; American Indian History; American Indian Languages; American Indian Literature; American Indian Studies; Annotated Bibliographies; Audiovisual Aids; *Canada Natives; Elementary Secondary Education; *Eskimos; Foreign Countries; Instructional Material Evaluation; *Instructional Materials; *Library Collections; *Metis (People); *Resource Materials; Tribes IDENTIFIERS *Canada; Native Americans ABSTRACT This bibliography lists materials on Native peoples available through the library at the Manitoba Department of Education and Training (Canada). All materials are loanable except the periodicals collection, which is available for in-house use only. Materials are categorized under the headings of First Nations, Inuit, and Metis and include both print and audiovisual resources. Print materials include books, research studies, essays, theses, bibliographies, and journals; audiovisual materials include kits, pictures, jackdaws, phonodiscs, phonotapes, compact discs, videorecordings, and films. The approximately 2,000 listings include author, title, publisher, a brief description, library
    [Show full text]
  • Ohio Archaeology Book Author: Tom Law Ohio Archaeology: an Illustrated Chronicle of Ohio’S Ancient American Indian Cultures
    June 27, 2014 Web artice: Ohio Archaeology book Author: Tom Law Ohio Archaeology: An Illustrated Chronicle of Ohio’s Ancient American Indian Cultures Producer: Voyageur Media Group, Inc. Project Director: Tom Law Editor: Rebecca A. Hawkins Author: Bradley T. Lepper Release: 2005 (1st edition); 2009 (2nd edition) Publisher: Orange Frazer Press, Wilmington, Ohio, (800) 852-9332; orangefrazer.com (see Nature). Summary Ohio Archaeology: An Illustrated Chronicle of Ohio’s Ancient American Indian Cultures is a fascinating journey of discovery into what scientists know about a series of American Indian cultures that flourished in the state for over 12,000 years. Author Bradley T. Lepper, Curator of Archaeology, Ohio Historical Society, explores the daily life, astounding achievements and mysterious legacies of the first "Ohioans," from the earliest Paleoindian hunters to the last Fort Ancient farmers before European contact. This beautiful 304-page, coffee table-style book contains over 340 color illustrations, including photographs of archaeological sites, excavations and research labs, museum artifacts, a series of original artworks, computer graphics of reconstructed sites, and maps and timelines for each of Ohio's six archaeological periods. Ohio Archaeology also presents 28 feature articles contributed by top regional scholars about specific archaeological sites and investigations (see Table of Contents). While the book focuses on recent archaeological discoveries, Ohio Archaeology also examines the past and future of the discipline. Historian Dr. Terry Barnhart contributes an intriguing essay about Ohio's important role in the development of American archaeology from the late 1700s to the early 1900s. The epilogue, "Legacies," closes with an introspective summary of the scientific and cultural issues being debated by archaeologists, American Indians and government officials in the 21st century.
    [Show full text]
  • BRIAN G. REDMOND, Ph.D
    BRIAN G. REDMOND, Ph.D. Dept. of Archaeology The Cleveland Museum of Natural History 1 Wade Oval Dr., University Circle Cleveland, Ohio 44106 PROFESSIONAL POSITIONS 1994-present: Curator and John Otis Hower Chair of Archaeology, The Cleveland Museum of Natural History (C.M.N.H). 2010-2011: Interim Director of Science, Collections and Research Division, C.M.N.H. 2001-2006: Director of Science, Collections and Research Division, C.M.N.H. 1992-94: Acting Assistant Director for Research, Glenn A. Black Laboratory of Archaeology, Indiana University, Bloomington. 1992: Visiting Research Associate, Glenn A. Black Laboratory of Archaeology, Indiana University, Bloomington. 1990-91: Associate Faculty, Dept. of Anthropology, Indiana University, Indianapolis. PROFESSIONAL APPOINTMENTS Current: Adjunct Associate Professor, Dept. Of Anthropology, Case Western Reserve University. Adjunct Faculty, Dept. of Anthropology, Cleveland State University. Research Associate, Glenn A. Black Laboratory of Archaeology, Indiana University, Bloomington. PROFESSIONAL SERVICE POSITIONS Current: Chair, Ohio Archaeological Council Publications Committee; Website Editor. 2002-2003 President of the Ohio Archaeological Council. 2000-2001 President-elect of the Ohio Archaeological Council. EDUCATION 1990: Ph.D. in Anthropology, Indiana University, Bloomington. 1984: Masters of Arts and Education in Anthropology, University of Toledo, Ohio. 1980: Bachelor of Arts (cum laude) in Anthropology, University of Toledo, Ohio. 1 PEER-REVIEWED PUBLICATIONS 2015 Redmond, B.G. and Robert A. Genheimer (editors) Building the Past, An Introduction. In Building the Past: Prehistoric Wooden Post Architecture in the Ohio Valley-Great Lakes Region. University Press of Florida. 2015 Redmond, B. G. and B. L. Scanlan Changes in Pre-Contact Domestic Architecture at the Heckelman Site in Northern Ohio.
    [Show full text]
  • Paleoindian Economic Organization in the Lower Great Lakes Region: Evaluating the Role of Caribou As a Critical Resource
    PALEOINDIAN ECONOMIC ORGANIZATION IN THE LOWER GREAT LAKES REGION: EVALUATING THE ROLE OF CARIBOU AS A CRITICAL RESOURCE By Dillon H. Carr A DISSERTATION Submitted to Michigan State University In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY ANTHROPOLOGY 2012 ABSTRACT PALEOINDIAN ECONOMIC ORGANIZATION IN THE LOWER GREAT LAKES REGION: EVALUATING THE ROLE OF CARIBOU AS A CRITICAL RESOURCE By Dillon H. Carr There is a widespread perception that Rangifer tarandus (caribou) constitutes a critical resource for Late Pleistocene and Early Holocene hunter-gatherers inhabiting the lower Great Lakes region. However, this perception has not been formally tested using the regional archaeological record. To this end, this dissertation constitutes a formal test of the caribou hunting hypothesis utilizing archeological data from lower Great Lakes Paleoindian (ca. 11,500- 10,000 BP) sites. To formally test the hypothesis that caribou were the organizational focus of lower Great Lakes Paleoindian subsistence economies a heuristic model for a residentially mobile caribou hunting society is constructed from ethnographic and comparative archaeological data. Archaeological data from lower Great Lakes Paleoindians are compared against expected patterning derived from the residentially mobile caribou hunting model to evaluate the extent to which patterned variability in the Paleoindian archaeological record reflects an intensive caribou hunting society. This formal evaluation of the caribou hunting hypothesis indicates that certain aspects of the Paleoindian archaeological record support the idea that caribou were an important resource. In particular, there is some evidence to suggest that more standardized extractive implements and larger, multi-locus, Lake Algonquian coastal sites support an interpretation of intercept caribou hunting.
    [Show full text]
  • Article Info Abstract
    Journal of Archaeological Science 53 (2015) 550e558 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Archaeological Science journal homepage: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jas Neutron activation analysis of 12,900-year-old stone artifacts confirms 450e510þ km Clovis tool-stone acquisition at Paleo Crossing (33ME274), northeast Ohio, U.S.A. * Matthew T. Boulanger a, b, , Briggs Buchanan c, Michael J. O'Brien b, Brian G. Redmond d, * Michael D. Glascock a, Metin I. Eren b, d, a Archaeometry Laboratory, University of Missouri Research Reactor, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA b Department of Anthropology, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA c Department of Anthropology, University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK, 74104, USA d Department of Archaeology, Cleveland Museum of Natural History, Cleveland, OH, 44106-1767, USA article info abstract Article history: The archaeologically sudden appearance of Clovis artifacts (13,500e12,500 calibrated years ago) across Received 30 August 2014 Pleistocene North America documents one of the broadest and most rapid expansions of any culture Received in revised form known from prehistory. One long-asserted hallmark of the Clovis culture and its rapid expansion is the 1 November 2014 long-distance acquisition of “exotic” stone used for tool manufacture, given that this behavior would be Accepted 5 November 2014 consistent with geographically widespread social contact and territorial permeability among mobile Available online 13 November 2014 hunteregatherer populations. Here we present geochemical evidence acquired from neutron activation analysis (NAA) of stone flaking debris from the Paleo Crossing site, a 12,900-year-old Clovis camp in Keywords: Clovis northeastern Ohio. These data indicate that the majority stone raw material at Paleo Crossing originates Colonization from the Wyandotte chert source area in Harrison County, Indiana, a straight-line distance of 450 Long-distance resource acquisition e510 km.
    [Show full text]
  • 1996 Midwest Archaeological Conference Abstracts
    ARCHIVES Office of the State Archaeologist The University of Iowa Iowa City, IA 52242 ~/f_DWEST .lI~HAEOLOGICAL CONFERENCE '· J, •. ABSTRACTS Department of Anthropology Logan Museum of Anthropology Beloit College Beloit, Wis. RHF Ce:utfere tfkC 19:Q b ~/)n.f:l . ) /?'le/~ --er,~ B <-!N '7/,vA-(}~ ~~ - ~ ~a:6.~ ;b~-6 ~/ifX-~oS>t /-r-so c? ..5J ,,cieo - /UL>✓ ·r~~ /}-'lo/7/?-C ~~ _/{,~~ . ~ :JG/:.. ~ - ~ ~~ Jc,d)a_ ~~~~~ ~ "'j> tJSS ,,' 04_ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ /J;rl - ~ ~a:l-eC.S~ ( ."" '~ co~ra- 9oz, -.. /t.Sil) ,(.(ln 0'1~ -h~~ll, -/-ot>t7-/5'>c) ~~J 7;.s:.sr'o~- -?,lf(..<.o~ :( ~o. i ~ ~ I ....50~ ; r!: bt.f /1-c; I - ,U) >u, t 0/U..4) t-q Forty-first Midwest Arc haeological Conference 10-12 October 1996 Abstracts M. Allen, C. Delaney-Ri vera, R. Hurtado, K. Rube, A. W inecke Center for American Archeology and U.C.L.A. Excavations at Audrey North: Evidence for a Stirling Phase American Bottom Colony in the Lower Illinois River Valley This paper describes a Stirling phase (A.D. 1100-1200) Mississippian colony from the American Bottom at the multi-component Audrey North site in the lower Illinois River Valley. Analysis of unpublished excavations conducted from 1975 to 1985 demonstrates that the palisaded Mississippian village or small town consisted of wal l-trench structures in par­ allel rows, a likely plaza, a possible sweat lodge and an unusually large building. The short duration of the colony and the low den­ sity of Stirling phase sett lement elsewhere in the region point to the failure of substantial Mississippian expansion along the lower illi­ nois River.
    [Show full text]
  • Before the Western Reserve: an Archaeological History of Northeast Ohio
    BEFORE THE WESTERN RESERVE: AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL HISTORY OF NORTHEAST OHIO Brian G. Redmond, Ph.D. Curator of Archaeology, The Cleveland Museum of Natural History March 2006 When Moses Cleaveland landed at the mouth of the Cuyahoga River in 1796, he had no idea that the human history of the land he was sent to survey was unbelievably ancient. He was also probably unaware that the few Native Americans that he met in the newly christened Western Reserve were relative newcomers. They were unrelated to the original inhabitants of the land whose final descendants had disappeared just a few generations earlier. This then, is a story of the first people of northeast Ohio. People whose true names are unknown, but whose deeds are reflected in the artifacts left behind. This is a history that only archaeologists can read, but one that all northeast Ohioans should know. The landscape of northeast Ohio is a relict of the great Late Pleistocene Ice Age. The rugged terrain, which begins just south and east of Cleveland, is known as the Glaciated Allegheny Plateau, an ice-scoured portion of the western foothills of the Appalachian Mountains. This land was once covered in thick Beech-Maple forest and small lakes and bogs left behind by the glaciers. The steepness of these "heights" is set off by the nearly flat Lake Erie Plain that hugs the south shore of Lake Erie from Buffalo to beyond Toledo. At the time of white settlement, the mixed oak forest of this plain was interrupted by coastal marshes, small prairies, and wide river estuaries.
    [Show full text]
  • 1998 Midwest Archaeological Conference Program
    8661 3VH ua.:raJuo3 .iIDI 8661 i aso .1-:>o Ji'2-12 YNY lc:JNI ';11:>Nnw ARCHIVES Office ot the State Archaeologist The University of Iowa Iowa City, IA 52242 ~'r ~~~ "~\ "'t"=l ll' 43rd Midwest Archaeological Conference Muncie, Indiana - 21-24 October 1998 ~SNS~ AL INFO~M.A'TfON Conference Headquarters All conference sessions will be held at the Radisson Hotel Roberts in downtown Muncie, across the street from the Muncie Convention Center. The hotel is a Muncie landmark that has been extensively renovated to restore it to its original elegance. In addition to the hotel parking lot, participants may use the Convention Center parking lot across the street. Registration Registration tables will be set up in the lobby of the Radisson Hotel Roberts and manned from 3 to 6 p.m. on Wednesday, 21 October, and from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m., Thursday and Friday. Please check in when you arrive to register or, if preregistered, to pick up your registration packet. Paper Sessions Conference papers will be presented in concurrent sessions on the mezzanine floor of the Radisson Hotel Roberts running from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on Thursday and Friday and from 8:00 a.m. to 12:00 noon on Saturday. Special Sessions A day-long preconference workshop on Midwest Protohistoric Ceramics (Penelope Drooker) will be held on Wednesday at Ball State's Kitselman Conference Center (3401 W. University Ave.). At the conference itself, five symposia have been arranged: Computer-Assisted Archaeology (John Staeck), Ohio and Pennsylvania in Later Prehistory (David M.
    [Show full text]