DOCSLIB.ORG

TO LEADING LAW FIRMS the AM LAW 100/200 the GLOBAL 100 the A-LIST Corporateuide SCORECARD

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
TO LEADING LAW FIRMS the AM LAW 100/200 the GLOBAL 100 the A-LIST Corporateuide SCORECARD UIDE TO LEADING LAW FIRMS THE AM LAW 100/200 THE GLOBAL 100 THE A-LIST CORPORATEuide SCORECARD UIDE ZEUGHAUSER GROUP’S 2009 POCKET GUIDE TO THE AMERICAN LAWYER RANKINGS The Zeughauser Group Dear Clients and Other Friends: We are pleased to provide you with our ZGuide to Leading Law Firms, including the 2009 Am Law 200 and 2008 Global 100 rankings—our seventh edition of the ZGuide. In 2008 the economy continued the softening that began in the second half of 2007. Activity at most law firms took a nosedive in the fourth quarter and, as a result, 2008 was the first year in 17 years in which the Am Law 100 declined in both revenue per lawyer and profits per equity partner. Some pundits have declared the end of the golden era for law firms and the death of the traditional law firm model. While we agree that there will be significant changes in the profession, we believe that the fundamentals on which the traditional law firm model are based—including the promise of a rewarding career, with training and partnership for those lawyers who demonstrate the traits of ownership and find career satisfaction in helping clients achieve their goals—will continue to be valid. Firms with the discipline to adapt to changes in our increasingly competitive and interdependent global marketplace, but that retain their focus on these fundamental values, will lead the industry out of the recession and enjoy still greater strength. Those that don’t will weaken. • ZGuide • Last year we predicted that the recession and liquidity crisis would make 2008 the most challenging year for many large law firms in over a decade, but we expressed confidence that all firms would enjoy opportunities to invest in growth strategies during the downturn. In this regard, we were privileged in 2008 to work with many of the world’s leading law firms on growth, marketing, and client-development strategies, and to enjoy the ongoing participation of over 50 of the Am Law 100 and 200 firms in our Chair and CMO Roundtables. We believe 2009 will be more challenging still, but also will present greater opportunities for growth. We again look forward to helping our clients marshal their resources in their drive for market leadership. We wish our clients and other friends in the industry renewed determination, clear vision, great success, and prosperity throughout 2009 and into 2010, times that will challenge us all to be our best. Sincerely, Ron Beard Jerome L. Coben Mozhgan Mizban Norm Rubenstein Jack Walker Mary K Young Peter Zeughauser Kent Zimmermann Lonnie Zwerin © Incisive Media US Properties, LLC and Zeughauser Group, LLC Chart information reprinted with permission from the April, May, June 2009 and October 2008 issues of The American Lawyer (The Am Law 100, The Am Law 200, Corporate Scorecard, The A-List, and The Global 100). © 2009 Incisive Media US Properties, LLC • ZGuide • Table of Contents Methodology The Am Law 200, A-List . 2 The Am Law 200 Ranked by Profits Per Equity Partner . 4 The Am Law 200 Ranked by Value Per Lawyer. 24 The 2009 Am Law 100 Forward Looking Strategies: Tough Medicine and Elixirs for Success . 34 Methodology The Global 100. 42 The Global 100 Ranked by Profits Per Equity Partner . 44 Assessing the Performance of Client Service Teams. 54 Methodology The Corporate Scorecard. 58 The Corporate Scorecard . 60 Mergers and Acquisitions. 60 Private Equity. 62 IPOs. 63 Equities by U.S. Corporations. 63 Investment-Grade Debt . 64 High-Yield Debt. 64 Asset-Backed Securities . 65 Mortgage-Backed Securities . 66 Municipal Bonds . 66 Project Finance . 68 REIT Equities . 69 REIT Debt . 70 Bankruptcies. 70 Emergences . 72 Law Firm Index . 75 ZGuide • 1 The Am Law 200 Methodology The Am Law 200 is reported by staff members at Incisive Media’s publications throughout the United States, including The American Lawyer, The Connecticut Law Tribune, Daily Business Review (Miami), Fulton County Daily Report (Atlanta), The Legal Intelligencer (Philadelphia), Legal Times (Washington, DC), The New Jersey Law Journal, New York Law Journal, The Recorder (San Francisco), and Texas Lawyer. Most law firms provide their financials voluntarily for this report, but all data, whether it comes officially from the firm or not, is investigated by reporters. Definitions Gross Revenue is fee income from legal work only. It does not include disbursements or income from nonlegal ancillary businesses. In all cases, the revenue and profit figures listed are for the firm’s most recently completed fiscal year. Most Am Law firms are on a calendar fiscal year. Net is compensation paid to equity partners. Equity Partners are those who file a Schedule K-1 tax form and receive no more than half their compensation on a fixed-income basis. Nonequity Partners are those who receive more than half their compensation on a fixed basis. To ensure that profits per partner and leverage data are consistent, partners without equity shares in the firm’s profits (or who do not have more than a partial equity share in the firm’s profits) are not counted as partners. Similarly, retired partners and of counsel are not counted as partners, nor are payments made to them counted in net operating income. Lawyer numbers are for full-time equivalent lawyers for firms whose fiscal year ends after August 31, 2008, and are provided as of that date. If the firm’s fiscal year ended between March 31 and August 31, 2008, the firm was asked to give the end of the firm’s fiscal year. 2 • ZGuide This is intended to exclude first-year associates, who typically start in the fall but take several months to produce revenue. Calculations • Gross Revenue is rounded to the nearest $500,000. Methodology • Profits Per Partner, Revenue Per Lawyer, and Average Com- pensation for All Partners are rounded to the nearest $5,000. • Revenue Per Lawyer (RPL) is calculated by dividing gross rev- enue by the number of lawyers. • Profits Per Partner (PPP) is calculated by dividing net operating income by the number of equity partners. • Compensation Average, All Partners is the net operat- ing income plus compensation to nonequity partners, divided by the number of equity and nonequity partners. • Value Per Lawyer (VPL) is calculated by dividing the Com- pensation Average, All Partners by the total number of lawyers. That number is then divided by $10 million to see how many lawyers it takes to generate that amount. Location of Firms Some firms are identified as “international” or “national,” rather than identifying them by city, according to the percentage of the firm’s attorneys who work in various regions of the country and the percentage that work outside the United States. Those breakouts are obtained from the most recent National Law Journal NLJ 250 survey. If 40 percent or more of the firm’s lawyers were located outside the U.S., the firm is identified as “international.” If no more than 45 percent of the firm’s attorneys were located in any one region of the country, the firm is identified as “national.” The A-List The A-List, comprised of just 20 firms, is determined by rankings in four surveys—The American Lawyer’s Revenue Per Lawyer (from The Am Law 200); Pro Bono; and Midlevel Associate Survey rankings; and The Minority Law Journal'’s Diversity Scorecard rankings. Rankings in each survey are converted into points, using an inversion calculation where a firm ranked Number One receives 200 points, and a firm ranked Number 200 receives just one point. To determine each firm’s score, points are doubled for both Revenue Per Lawyer and Pro Bono rankings and then added to the scores for the Midlevel Associate Survey and Diversity Scorecard rankings. Additional information about the A-List is available on americanlawyer.com and in the July issue of The American Lawyer.u ZGuide • The Am Law 200 The Largest Firms in the U.S., Ranked By Profits Per Partner Compensation Firm Profits Per Revenue Per Average, Lawyers, Partners, Location PPP Rank 2009 Rank PPP 2008 Rank PPP Equity Partner Gross Revenue Rank 200 Law Am Lawyer Rank RPL All Partners Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz 1 1 $,010,000 $50,000,000 55 $2,55,000 1 $,010,000 216 Lawyers, 81 Equity Partners, 0 Nonequity Partners, New York Quinn Emanuel Urquhart Oliver & Hedges 2 5 $,5,000 $2,000,000 66 $1,105,000 11 $2,690,000 00 Lawyers, 78 Equity Partners, 26 Nonequity Partners, Los Angeles Boies, Schiller & Flexner $,065,000 $295,000,000 92 $1,180,000 6 $1,60,000 250 Lawyers, 2 Equity Partners, 68 Nonequity Partners, National Sullivan & Cromwell I $2,90,000 $985,000,000 15 $1,80,000 2 $2,90,000 665 Lawyers, 170 Equity Partners, 0 Nonequity Partners, New York 5 8 Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison I $2,655,000 $692,000,000 7 $1,070,000 1 $2,655,000 67 Lawyers, 11 Equity Partners, 0 Nonequity Partners, New York Cravath, Swaine & Moore 6 2 $2,520,000 $52,500,000 52 $1,210,000 $2,520,000 0 Lawyers, 90 Equity Partners, 0 Nonequity Partners, New York Simpson Thacher & Bartlett 7 6 $2,75,000 $90,000,000 25 $1,10,000 10 $2,75,000 801 Lawyers, 17 Equity Partners, 0 Nonequity Partners, New York 8 11 Kirkland & Ellis I $2,70,000 $1,00,000,000 7 $1,050,000 15 $1,0,000 1, Lawyers, 25 Equity Partners, 10 Nonequity Partners, National 9 19 Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton I $2,00,000 $965,000,000 18 $970,000 2 $2,00,000 99 Lawyers, 191 Equity Partners, 0 Nonequity Partners, International Schulte Roth & Zabel 10 12 $2,290,000 $20,000,000 68 $970,000 2 $2,290,000 Lawyers, 82 Equity Partners, 0 Nonequity Partners, New York 11 20 Weil, Gotshal & Manges I $2,270,000 $1,21,000,000 9 $1,05,000 16 $1,770,000
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lessons Learned from Law Firm Failures
    ALA San Francisco Chapter Lessons Learned from Law Firm Failures Kristin Stark Principal, Fairfax Associates July 2016 Page 0 About Fairfax Fairfax Associates provides strategy and management consulting to law firms Strategy & Performance & Governance & Merger Direction Compensation Management Strategy Development and Partner Performance and Governance and Merger Strategy Implementation Compensation Management Firm Performance and Operational Structures & Practice Strategy Merger Search Profitability Improvement Reviews Market and Sector Merger Negotiation and Pricing Partnership Structure Research Structure Client Research and Key Process Improvement Alternative Business Models Client Development Merger Integration Page 1 1 Topics for Discussion • Disruptive Change • Dissolution Trends • Symptoms of Struggle: What Causes Law Firms to Fail? • What Keeps Firms From Changing? • Managing for Stability Page 2 How Rapidly is the Legal Industry Changing? Today 10 Years 2004 Ago Number of US firms at $1 billion or 2327 4 more in revenue: Average gross revenue for Am Law $482$510 million $271 million 200: Median gross revenue for Am Law $310$328 million $193 million 200: NLJ 250 firms with single office 4 11 operations: Number of Am Law 200 lawyers 25,000 10,000 based outside US: Page 4 2 How Rapidly is the Legal Industry Changing? Changes to the Law Firm Business Model Underway • Convergence • Dramatic reduction • Disaggregation in costs • Increasing • Process Client commoditization Overhead improvement • New pricing Model efforts models • Outsourcing
    [Show full text]
  • 03.031 Socc04 Final 2(R)
    STATEOF CENTER CITY 2008 Prepared by Center City District & Central Philadelphia Development Corporation May 2008 STATEOF CENTER CITY 2008 Center City District & Central Philadelphia Development Corporation 660 Chestnut Street Philadelphia PA, 19106 215.440.5500 www.CenterCityPhila.org TABLEOFCONTENTSCONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 OFFICE MARKET 2 HEALTHCARE & EDUCATION 6 HOSPITALITY & TOURISM 10 ARTS & CULTURE 14 RETAIL MARKET 18 EMPLOYMENT 22 TRANSPORTATION & ACCESS 28 RESIDENTIAL MARKET 32 PARKS & RECREATION 36 CENTER CITY DISTRICT PERFORMANCE 38 CENTER CITY DEVELOPMENTS 44 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 48 Center City District & Central Philadelphia Development Corporation www.CenterCityPhila.org INTRODUCTION CENTER CITY PHILADELPHIA 2007 was a year of positive change in Center City. Even with the new Comcast Tower topping out at 975 feet, overall office occupancy still climbed to 89%, as the expansion of existing firms and several new arrivals downtown pushed Class A rents up 14%. For the first time in 15 years, Center City increased its share of regional office space. Healthcare and educational institutions continued to attract students, patients and research dollars to downtown, while elementary schools experienced strong demand from the growing number of families in Center City with children. The Pennsylvania Convention Center expansion commenced and plans advanced for new hotels, as occupancy and room rates steadily climbed. On Independence Mall, the National Museum of American Jewish History started construction, while the Barnes Foundation retained designers for a new home on the Benjamin Franklin Parkway. Housing prices remained strong, rents steadily climbed and rental vacancy rates dropped to 4.6%, as new residents continued to flock to Center City. While the average condo sold for $428,596, 115 units sold in 2007 for more than $1 million, double the number in 2006.
    [Show full text]
  • Educating Artists
    DUKE LAW MAGAZINE MAGAZINE LAW DUKE Fall 2006 | Volume 24 Number 2 F all 2006 Educating Artists V olume 24 Number 2 Also: Duke Faculty on the Hill From the Dean Dear Alumni and Friends, University’s Algernon Sydney Sullivan Medal, awarded annually for outstanding commitment to service. This summer, four Duke law faculty members were Graduates Candace Carroll ’74 and Len Simon ’73 called to testify before Congressional committees. have used their talents and resources in support Professor Neil Vidmar appeared before the Senate of civil liberties, women’s rights, and public inter- Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions, est causes; their recent leadership gift to Duke’s to address legislation on medical malpractice suits. Financial Aid Initiative helps Duke continue to attract Professor Madeline Morris testified before the Senate the best students, regardless of their ability to pay, Foreign Relations Committee regarding ratification of and gives them greater flexibility to pursue public the U.S.–U.K. extradition treaty. Professor James Cox interest careers. Other alumni profiled in this issue offered his views on proposed reforms for the conduct who are using their Duke Law education to make a of securities class action litigation to the House difference include Judge Curtis Collier ’74, Chris Kay Committee on Financial Services Subcommittee ’78, Michael Dockterman ’78, Andrea Nelson Meigs on Capital Markets, Insurance, and Government ’94, and Judge Gerald Tjoflat ’57. Sponsored Enterprises. Professor Scott Silliman, I want to thank all alumni, friends, and faculty executive director of the Center on Law, Ethics and who contributed so generously to the Law School in National Security, was on Capitol Hill three times in the past year.
    [Show full text]
  • Staying Put the Great Recession Led to a Ten-Year Low in Lateral Partner Moves
    www.americanlawyer.com February 2011 THE LATERAL REPORT STAYING PUT The Great Recession led to a ten-year low in lateral partner moves. BY VICTOR LI FTER A RECORD YEAR for lateral moves What accounts for the drop? For one thing, the 2009 in 2009, law firm partners looked around numbers were artificially high because the market was in 2010 and decided that there was flooded with partners from firms that went under, such as no place like home. In the 12-month Heller Ehrman, Thacher Proffitt & Wood, Thelen, and period ending September 30, 2010, WolfBlock. (Those four firms accounted for 15 percent only 2,014 partners left or joined of the 2009 moves.) Additionally, continued economic un- Am Law 200 firms. That number certainty in 2010 meant that some firms were reluctant to was a hefty decrease—27 percent—from the same period hire. “In general, firms have been much more opportunistic a year earlier, when a whopping 2,775 partners moved. In [about partner recruiting], and that’s due to the relative sta- fact, 2010 marked the lowest number of partner moves bilization of the industry,” says Ari Katz, national director since 2000, when only 1,859 partners switched firms, and of legal recruiting at Bingham McCutchen. was well off the average of 2,458 partner moves each year Still, some firms defied this trend. DLA Piper could from 2005 to 2009. have installed turnstiles in its lobbies with all the turnover Illustration By JOHN UELAND it experienced as it brought in 67 partners, more than any other Am Rochester-based partners departed for LeClairRyan after our survey Law 200 firm, and was also among the leaders in departures—42.
    [Show full text]
  • Nameprotect Trademark Insider®
    NAMEPROTECT TRADEMARK INSIDER® Comprehensive Guide: Trademark Industry IN THIS ISSUE: Top 200 Trademark Firms Top 100 Company Trademark Filers 2003 Industry Summary Madrid Protocol Annual NameProtect Trademark Insider AwardsTM Annual Report 2003 NameProtect ® digital brand protection Methodology Pre-Publication Review The NameProtect Trademark Insider® is developed through analysis of public Upon request, NameProtect is happy to offer any attorney, law firm or company trademark filings data compiled by the United States Patent and Trademark the opportunity to review our rankings prior to publication. Interested parties Office (PTO) and maintained in NameProtect's global trademark data center. may submit a request for pre-publication review to the Trademark Insider edi- tors at [email protected]. Data Integrity In order to ensure the integrity and accuracy of the law firm and company rank- Disclaimer ings presented herein, NameProtect employs the following data integrity practices: NameProtect makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of the data provided within this report. However, for various reasons including the potential for 1) Collection. As a trademark services provider, NameProtect collects and incomplete or inaccurate data supplied by the United States Patent and aggregates PTO and other trademark filing data from around the world, which Trademark Office, we cannot warrant that this report or the information con- is maintained in electronic form in the Company's trademark data center. tained herein is error free. NameProtect will not be liable for any reliance upon the 2) Normalization. In order to create this report, data from numerous fields data, analysis, opinions or other information presented within this report. within the PTO data set is normalized and parsed for detailed aggregation and Contact Information analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Disaster Plans Falter After Blast Debris Hundreds Soon As Possible,Even If It Is of Feet Into the Air
    nb30p01.qxp 7/20/2007 7:45 PM Page 1 TOP STORIES BUSINESS Tech demand LIVES returns PR firms New Yorkers follow to the glory days Angelina Jolie far PAGE 2 afield to adopt ® How people meters PAGE 27 are bringing oldies back to NY radio VOL. XXIII, NO. 30 WWW.NEWYORKBUSINESS.COM JULY 23-29, 2007 PRICE: $3.00 PAGE 2 Mayor Bloomberg eyes a clear road on congestion Disaster pricing approval PAGE 3 plans falter News and Post buck national ad trends; Milford after blast Plaza gets redo NEW YORK, NEW YORK, P. 6 Firms scramble to keep operations going; Economic adages busy commercial district paralyzed for optimists who say market will rise der over and over; then the win- STILL FRESH: BY ELISABETH BUTLER CORDOVA dows shattered, and thick, dark GREG DAVID, PAGE 13 Contaminants AND AMANDA FUNG smoke flooded the of- haven’t been found in fice,”says David Bernard, imported first came the terrorist managing director of DB seafood in attacks on Sept. 11, Marketing Technolo- Chinatown. 2001, and then the 30- gies. The 10-employee hour blackout that hit on consulting firm is based Aug. 14, 2003. Each at 370 Lexington Ave., event sent an unmistak- one of the six buildings able message to New closest to the blast. York’s business commu- Mr. Bernard and his BUSINESS nity: Firms have to be colleagues hid under their OF SPORTS prepared to cope with the desks for several minutes. unexpected. Real estate When it became appar- G Suite deals at Now add the Man- at site* ent that the flow of mud stadiums bring teams hattan steam-pipe explo- pouring through the bro- sion of July 18, 2007— ken windows wasn’t abat- into 21st century buck ennis PAGE 17 which paralyzed one of ing, they fled down nine HIDDEN DANGER? the city’s busiest com- 1.6M flights of stairs.
    [Show full text]
  • 2007 Pro Bono Institute Law Firm Pro Bono Challengesm Results
    2007 Pro Bono Institute Law Firm Pro Bono ChallengeSM Results Executive Summary Introduction The Pro Bono Institute's Law Firm Pro Bono ChallengeSM is a unique global aspirational pro bono standard. Developed by law firm leaders and corporate general counsel, the Challenge articulates a single, unitary standard for one key segment of the legal profession - the world's largest law firms. Major law firms that become Signatories to the Challenge acknowledge their institutional, firm-wide commitment to provide pro bono legal services to low income and disadvantaged individuals and families and non-profit groups. The Challenge includes an accountability mechanism and an outcome measurement tool through its annual reporting requirement. The following is an executive summary of the 2007 Challenge statistics reported by Challenge Signatories and compiled by the Law Firm Pro Bono Project. ChallengeSM Performance “Striving to meet the goals of the Law Firm Pro Bono ChallengeSM, a national aspirational pro bono standard, 135 of the nation’s largest law firms provided almost 1,600,000 hours in donated legal services to the poor and disadvantaged and charitable organizations in 1995, the first year of the Challenge.” That was the opening paragraph of the Executive Summary issued by the Pro Bono Institute in 1995, when it announced the amount of pro bono legal services contributed by PBI Challenge Signatory law firms in the first year of implementation of the Challenge. Between 1995 and 2007 there have been substantial changes in the size, culture, management, economics, and staffing of major law firms but arguably one of the most notable changes is the amount and nature of pro bono services performed by these firms.
    [Show full text]
  • Economy-League-2007-2008-Annual
    annual report 2007 2008 230 S. Broad St., Suite 403 Philadelphia PA 19102 T. 215.875.1000 F. 215.875.1010 www.EconomyLeague.org [email protected] B oard of D irectors James R. Waddington, Jr. Stephen C. Baker, Esq. Gwynneth H. Stott Regional Entrepreneurs Chair Drinker Biddle & PricewaterhouseCoopers Glenn Blumenfeld Lockheed Martin Reath, LLP Rick Altman Tactix Real Estate Advsors, LLC John F. Smith, III, Esq. Elaine N. Moranz, Esq. Radian Group, Inc. Diana Bald We live in a complicated region. Three states, six legislative bodies, 11 or Vice Chair Fox Rothschild, LLP Kenneth R. Frappier Univision 65 & Telefutura 28 9 or 14 counties (depending on your affiliation), hundreds of municipali- Reed Smith, LLP Michael F. Corrigan RAIT Financial Trust ties and school districts. It’s no easy task to get all our oars in the water at James P. Dunigan GlaxoSmithKline Gary Bennett Senior Executive Fellows Immediate Past Chair the same time, but now more than ever, it’s critical that we do. Denise E. Collins Right Management Brian Clapp PNC Bank Holy Redeemer Thomas D. Macphee Judith Tschirgi As the Economy League prepares to enter into our second century, we recog- Steven T. Wray Health System Rohm & Haas Company Executive Director Staff nize that our region is at a turning point: we can continue to operate as we do Christopher Cashman Robert J. Jones, Esq. Economy League of Greater today and be a good region, or we can seize the opportunity to be a great one. Independence Blue Cross Saul Ewing, LLP Steven T. Wray Philadelphia We have many things working in our favor, yet a few tough, but not Jeffrey P.
    [Show full text]
  • What Trust Law Can Teach Us About Conflicts of Interest
    LESLIE - DRAFT 08HP 4/26/2010 9:32:31 AM HELPING NONPROFITS POLICE THEMSELVES: WHAT TRUST LAW CAN TEACH US ABOUT CONFLICTS OF INTEREST MELANIE B. LESLIE1 INTRODUCTION Over the past decade, scandals involving nonprofit boards and con- flicts of interest have been the subject of considerable public attention. The resulting bad publicity, Congressional hearings, and calls for reform have failed to mitigate the problem. In 2009 alone the country witnessed several spectacular examples of self-dealing by nonprofit directors. For example, The Boston Globe recently reported that Suffolk University has a $10,000 per month contract with Wolfblock Public Strategies, lobbyist Robert Crowe’s firm. Robert Crowe is also a Suffolk University trustee, and a member of the compensation committee that made University President David Sargent the highest-paid University President in 2006. When two Boston Globe reporters questioned Crowe about the apparent conflict-of- interest, he replied, “[t]o even insinuate there is a conflict is wrong. There is no conflict . [w]hether or not my public strategy group is paid $10,000 is not relevant. We don’t make money on that. We are providing a service to Suffolk.”2 Ezra Merkin, the chair of Yeshiva University’s investment committee, invested millions of dollars of Yeshiva University’s endowment with Ascot Partners, a hedge fund he controlled.3 His 1.5% management fee was ar- guably higher than Yeshiva could have obtained from an arms-length transaction. Worse, Yeshiva’s board allegedly did not require Merkin to disclose his investment strategy as a condition to taking the money.
    [Show full text]
  • Law Firms: Public Interest and Pro Bono Opportunities Public Service Opportunities for Second Year Law Students
    LAW FIRMS: PUBLIC INTEREST AND PRO BONO OPPORTUNITIES PUBLIC SERVICE OPPORTUNITIES FOR SECOND YEAR LAW STUDENTS PUBLIC INTEREST OPPORTUNITIES FOR SECOND YEAR STUDENTS Pro Bono Opportunities Working at a firm for a summer or as a graduate does not mean that you can't be involved in public interest and pro bono work. There are opportunities for service through the many established law firm pro bono and public service fellowship programs. Below is an outline of some of those programs. Many of the law firms that participate in Penn Law School's OCI program have strong pro bono programs in which their summer associates and attorneys can participate. Many of the firms that participate in Penn Law recruiting programs are signatories of the American Bar Association's Pro Bono Challenge and have agreed to donate a certain percentage of their billable hours to pro bono. Additionally, several firms have developed programs that allow their summer associates to work with a public interest organization for longer periods, usually from one to seven weeks. Public Interest Split Summers The firms listed below have programs that allow summer associates to spend some part of their summer at a public interest organization. Associates are often paid their firm salary for both parts of the summer, although other arrangements can be made. Firms may or may not recruit on campus. Additionally, you should check with the firms’ web sites for the most up-to-date and correct information. Arnold & Porter, NY www.arnoldporter.com Arnold & Port allows a 2L to split the summer between the firm and a New York City public interest organization.
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate Counsel Institute Justice Anthony Kennedy March 6-7, 2008 Georgetown University Law Center Washington, DC
    In cooperation with the 12th Annual Corporate Counsel Institute Justice Anthony Kennedy March 6-7, 2008 Georgetown University Law Center Washington, DC 11.5 CLE credit hours (60 minute hour), including 2.0 of legal ethics 14.0 CLE credit hours (50 minute hour), including 2.0 of legal ethics Agenda B. Employment Law Update: Institute Summary The Internet & The Workplace Georgetown Law CLE and the Association of Corporate Counsel (ACC) have developed Moderator: Christine Zebrowski a practical, relevant and comprehensive two-day program designed to help you address Panelists: Angeline G. Chen your challenges. Our national Advisory Board has created an agenda that combines critical William P.Flanagan substantive law updates with pragmatic tips on how to perform your job more effectively. Arnold H. Pedowitz Eric D. Reicin I Pre-employment - Use of Internet 11.5 CLE credit hours (60 minute hour), including 2.0 of legal ethics searches to make pre-employment 14.0 CLE credit hours (50 minute hour), including 2.0 of legal ethics decisions (including blogs, Google, MySpace, and Facebook) and rescission I Thursday, March 6 11:30 am-12:30 pm of job offers based on information found Antitrust Update: Enforcement on the Internet Priorities & Government Perspectives I 8:00-8:45 am I During employment - Is it concerted on Supreme Court Decisions Registration & Continental Breakfast activity under the National Labor Moderator: Prof. Robert Pitofsky Sponsored by Capital Legal Solutions Relations Act?, personal e-mail, blogging, Panelists: Hon.Thomas O. Barnett and IMing at work, official corporate Hon. Deborah Platt Majoras I 8:45-9:00 am blogging, and release of information (not I National enforcement priorities Welcome and Introduction necessarily confidential) on the Web, but I International antitrust developments Lawrence J.
    [Show full text]
  • Gifts to Duke Law" School Lowndes Professorship Created
    VOLUME 8 Contents From the Dean 5 Forum 6 Constitutional and Statutory Responses to Texas v. Johnson / Walter E. Dellinger; III 12 The Biggest Deal Ever / Deborah A. DeMott 24 About the School 25 Financial Aid: An Investment in the Future 30 The B. S. Womble Scholarship 33 The Docket 34 Faculty Profile: Robert P Mosteller; A Commitment to the l£lw DEAN EDITOR ASSOCIATE EDITOR Pamela B. Gann Evelyn M. Pursley Janse Conover Haywood NUMBER 1 38 Alumnus Profile: Arnold B. McKinnon '51, Running the Nation's Most Profitable Railroad 41 Alumnus Profile: Breckinridge L. Willcox '69, US. Attorney: The Best Job Government Can Give a Lawyer 44 Book Review: Robert Dole: American Political Phoenix by Stanley Goumas Hilton '75 46 Specially Noted 58 Alumni Activities 72 Upcoming Events Duke Law Magazine is published under the auspices of the Office of the Dean, Duke University School of Law, Durham, North Carolina 27706 © Duke University 1990 PHOTOGRAPHERS PRODUCTION Dan Crawford Graphic Arts Services Ron Ferrell Les Todd Jim Wallace DUKE LAW MAGAZINE / 2 From the Dean These pages give me an oppor­ tunity to share with alumni and friends information and issues about various facets of the Law School. In this issue, I want to discuss with you matters relating to our building renovations, admissions, placement, and the public service responsibility of lawyers. Law School Library Reno­ vations. Included on these pages are pictures of the recently com­ pleted renovations of the bottom floor of the library. The reaction of faculty, librarians, and students to the architect's design has been very positive.
    [Show full text]