DOCSLIB.ORG

Nameprotect Trademark Insider®

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Nameprotect Trademark Insider® NAMEPROTECT TRADEMARK INSIDER® Comprehensive Guide: Trademark Industry IN THIS ISSUE: Top 200 Trademark Firms Top 100 Company Trademark Filers 2003 Industry Summary Madrid Protocol Annual NameProtect Trademark Insider AwardsTM Annual Report 2003 NameProtect ® digital brand protection Methodology Pre-Publication Review The NameProtect Trademark Insider® is developed through analysis of public Upon request, NameProtect is happy to offer any attorney, law firm or company trademark filings data compiled by the United States Patent and Trademark the opportunity to review our rankings prior to publication. Interested parties Office (PTO) and maintained in NameProtect's global trademark data center. may submit a request for pre-publication review to the Trademark Insider edi- tors at [email protected]. Data Integrity In order to ensure the integrity and accuracy of the law firm and company rank- Disclaimer ings presented herein, NameProtect employs the following data integrity practices: NameProtect makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of the data provided within this report. However, for various reasons including the potential for 1) Collection. As a trademark services provider, NameProtect collects and incomplete or inaccurate data supplied by the United States Patent and aggregates PTO and other trademark filing data from around the world, which Trademark Office, we cannot warrant that this report or the information con- is maintained in electronic form in the Company's trademark data center. tained herein is error free. NameProtect will not be liable for any reliance upon the 2) Normalization. In order to create this report, data from numerous fields data, analysis, opinions or other information presented within this report. within the PTO data set is normalized and parsed for detailed aggregation and Contact Information analysis. NameProtect’s Trademark Insider is a quarterly publication of: 3) Scrubbing. Misspellings and other data errors are a common and significant NameProtect Inc. problem throughout much of the PTO's data. This is particularly true within 918 Deming Way the highly relevant "Applicant" and "Correspondent" fields, in which the legal Madison,WI 53717 representative for each trademark filing is recorded (for example, it is not 800-689-6223 uncommon to find top law firm and company names spelled in many different www.nameprotect.com variations). In order to ensure an accurate count of law firm and company fil- All rights reserved ings for our rankings, NameProtect employs significant technological and Subscription information is available at: human capital to "clean-up" misspellings, transpositions and other errors in www.trademarkinsider.com these data fields. Comments or questions should be directed to: Rankings Process [email protected] Law firms, attorneys and companies are ranked by the total number of new trademark applications submitted to the PTO during the applicable time Editors period. Each application is counted as one filing, regardless of the type of Mark McGuire application (i.e., single class versus multiple class). Law firms, companies and Data Compilation, Integrity & Analysis individual attorneys are given credit for the trademark filing if they are identi- Darla Marshman fied in the correspondent field of the initial application. Importantly, subse- quent amendments to the correspondent data are not analyzed as part of Technology NameProtect's standard analysis but may be considered on a case by case David Kurzynski basis as part of our pre-publication review process. We feel this bright-line Rob Benada approach, which gives credit to the entity actually filing the trademark applica- Art & Design tion, provides the most accurate measure of trademark application activity. Michael Stanton In the case of company rankings, the applicant field is also evaluated. Project/Print Coordinators Applications submitted by related entities (for example, a parent company and Lisa Wells subsidiary) are credited to the most identifiable corporate entity. Identification Jill Schultz of related corporate entities is completed by cross referencing address infor- mation and performing general industry research. NameProtect believes that combining related corporation entities produces the most realistic and accu- NameProtect ® rate company rankings possible. digital brand protection WWW.NAMEPROTECT.COM Copyright © 2002-2004 NameProtect Inc. All Rights Reserved NAMEPROTECT TRADEMARK INSIDER® NAMEPROTECT TRADEMARK INSIDER® Table of Contents — 2003 Annual Report Overview From the Editor . 2 Law Firm Rankings Top 100 — Q4 2003 . 3 Top 200 — Year End 2003 . 4 Company Rankings Top 100 — Q4 2003 . 6 Top 100 — Year End 2003 . 7 Market Movers . 8 2003 Industry Summary . 9 Madrid Protocol . 10 2003 Trademark Insider Awards . 11 NameProtect’s Trademark Insider® is a quarterly publication of NameProtect Inc. It may not be duplicated, reproduced, in whole or in part, or retransmitted without the express permission of NameProtect Inc., 918 Deming Way, Madison,WI 53717. NameProtect does not warrant the accuracy of any of the information presented herein. Copyright © 2002-2004 NameProtect Inc. All Rights Reserved WWW.NAMEPROTECT.COM 1 NAMEPROTECT TRADEMARK INSIDER® OVERVIEW From the Editor Welcome to the 2003 year-end edition of NameProtect’s Trademark Insider, a quarterly report on the market leaders and key trends at work in the trademark industry today. This year-end issue includes our standard industry coverage and rankings, as well as the announcement of NameProtect’s 2nd annual Trademark Insider Awards, given to the top U.S. trademark law firms and individual attorneys. 2003 TRADEMARK INSIDER AWARDS We are extremely pleased to announce the recipients of the 2003 Trademark Insider Awards, beginning on page 11. Although there are a number of repeat award winners in the 2003 list, there are also several first time award winners for 2003, including eight new law firms in our regional award list. We salute each award recipient for their significant accomplishments in 2003 and look forward to presenting them with their physical awards in the upcoming months. INDUSTRY RANKINGS “In stark contrast to many of the tragic In addition to the Trademark Insider Awards, this edition also includes events unfolding in Iraq and elsewhere NameProtect’s standard law firm and company rankings, beginning on around the globe, these are good times page 3. Mattel held onto the number one company spot in 2003 for the for the trademark industry.” second year running. The rest of the Top 10 company filers remained remarkably stable, with only one new entrant into the top 10 for 2003 (Deutsche Telekom AG at #9). The law firm marketplace leaders also stayed consistent from 2002 to 2003, with only two new entrants into the Top 10 (Greenberg Traurig and Alston & Bird). LET THE GOOD TIMES ROLL In stark contrast to many of the tragic events unfolding in Iraq and elsewhere around the globe, these are good times for the trademark industry. As we predicted early last year, the second half of 2003 saw continued year-over-year gains in trade- mark application volume. The surging U.S. economy is setting the stage for another growth year for trademarks in 2004, which is welcome news for everyone in the trademark industry. For a more detailed look at trademark filings for the last seven years, as well as some initial analysis of the Madrid Protocol’s effect on U.S. filings, please turn to our Industry Summary beginning on page 9. All of us at NameProtect wish you continued success in 2004 and beyond. As always, we welcome feedback and suggestions at: [email protected] Mark McGuire, Esq. Executive Editor, Trademark Insider Founder and President NameProtect Inc. [email protected] 2 WWW.NAMEPROTECT.COM Copyright © 2002-2004 NameProtect Inc. All Rights Reserved NAMEPROTECT TRADEMARK INSIDER® LAW FIRM RANKINGS Top 100 Trademark Law Firms—Q4 2003 The Top 100 Trademark Firm rankings are determined by the number of USPTO applications submitted during the fourth quarter of 2003 in which the firm is listed as the legal representative (correspondent). Each application is counted as one filing regardless of the application type. TOP 100 TRADEMARK LAW FIRMS—Q4 2003 Q4 #TMs 2002 Q4 #TMs 2002 Rank Law Firm Q4-03 Rank Rank Law Firm Q4-03 Rank 1 Greenberg Traurig 292 19 52 Allmark Trademark Service 96 96 2 Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu 202 1 54 Owen Wickersham & Erickson 95 65 3 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld 200 7 54 Duane Morris 95 39 4 Abelman Frayne & Schwab 195 2 56 Winthrop & Weinstine 93 N/A 5 Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman 190 6 57 Seyfarth Shaw 92 160 6 Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear 182 5 57 Hovey Williams 92 71 7 Finnegan Henderson Farabow Garrett & Dunner 180 16 57 Harness Dickey & Pierce 92 66 8 Sughrue Mion 174 4 57 Edell Shapiro & Finnan 92 N/A 9 Merchant & Gould 173 3 61 Wood Herron & Evans 90 48 10 Venable 171 14 61 Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice 90 83 11 Holland & Knight 166 10 61 Richard L. Morris, Jr., Esq. 90 25 12 Fulbright & Jaworski 160 18 61 Nixon Peabody 90 102 13 Quirk & Tratos 158 144 65 Paul Hastings Janofsky & Walker 89 56 14 Fish & Richardson 152 31 65 Jenkens & Gilchrist 89 38 15 Cowan Liebowitz & Latman 150 47 65 Heller Ehrman White & McAuliffe 89 99 15 Barnes & Thornburg 150 33 68 Burns Doane Swecker & Mathis 88 55 15 Arent Fox Kintner Plotkin & Kahn 150 13 69 McCarter & English 86 140 18 Mayer Brown Rowe & Maw 148 N/A 69 Gray Cary Ware & Freidenrich 86 36 19 Alston & Bird 144 23 69 Fitzpatrick Cella Harper & Scinto
Load more

Recommended publications
  • PACT Celebrates the Philadelphia Region's Top Firms and Executives
    PACT Celebrates the Philadelphia Region’s Top Firms and Executives at 21st Enterprise Awards Gala Annual Competition Recognizes Region’s Top Technology and Life Sciences Companies and Entrepreneurs Philadelphia, PA, May 8, 2014 – The Greater Philadelphia Alliance for Capital and Technologies (PACT), Philadelphia region’s premier technology and life sciences trade association, this evening recognized the winners of the 21st consecutive Enterprise Awards. As the marquee business awards ceremony in the region, the Enterprise Awards celebrates the vitality of the technology and life sciences communities. More than 900 business leaders and executives were on hand at the Valley Forge Casino Resort to honor the region’s top companies, executives and entrepreneurs. “It is an honor to recognize the best and brightest companies, leaders and future leaders of our region,” said Dianne Strunk, Vice President of PACT. “These companies and individuals represent the foundation and the future of our region’s economy. It is with great joy that we embrace their success and recognize them. These are the players in our region that solidify Philadelphia as a hub for technology and life science excellence and the cradle of entrepreneurship.” The following companies and entrepreneurs were honored at the 2014 Enterprise Awards: Life Sciences Startup Company: Spark Therapeutics, Philadelphia, PA Technology Startup Company: Clutch, Ambler, PA Emerging Life Sciences Company - Trevena, King of Prussia, PA Emerging Technology Company: CenTrak, Newtown, PA Investment
    [Show full text]
  • Summer ’20May 2019-June 2020 in THIS ISSUE 3 INVEST Sponsorship Program
    Summer ’20May 2019-June 2020 IN THIS ISSUE 3 INVEST Sponsorship Program Ballard Spahr Welcomes New 5Diverse Attorneys 7Rankings and Awards 8 Lawyer Spotlight: Alice Huang Conferences, Galas, and Welcome to the Summer 2020 11Awards issue of Spectrum. 12 Staff Spotlight: Hawa Salih “How Corporate Legal Departments In this issue, we share ways in which Ballard Spahr is working to increase diversity She also works closely with our growing list of Business Resource Can Advance and Retain Diverse 14Talent at Partner Law Firms” in the legal profession, enhance inclusion in the workplace, and strengthen external Groups to plan programming and she coordinates our high school and relationships. So much has happened since our last publication—some of which you college pipeline programs across the firm. Rudi processes sponsorship Welcome to Our New Diversity Manager, Maithili Pradhan will read in the next few pages. We recently began our journey toward Mansfield Rule and events requests, handles logistics, and keeps us organized and able 22 Certification, which I know we will achieve and exceed. We continued our partnership to meet the needs of internal and external clients. Events and Sponsorships with the Leadership Council for Legal Diversity (LCLD) with Judy Mok, Of Counsel 24 in the Consumer Financial Services Group, as our most recent Fellow. Kahlil Williams, Like our clients and colleagues in the profession, Ballard Spahr is In the Pipeline Associate in the White Collar Defense/Internal Investigations Group, also joined LCLD’s on a journey toward strengthening diversity and inclusion with an 26 Pathfinder Program. expanded focus on racial justice and equity within the walls of firm, “Sponsorship Programs as and in the communities where we live and work.
    [Show full text]
  • Lessons Learned from Law Firm Failures
    ALA San Francisco Chapter Lessons Learned from Law Firm Failures Kristin Stark Principal, Fairfax Associates July 2016 Page 0 About Fairfax Fairfax Associates provides strategy and management consulting to law firms Strategy & Performance & Governance & Merger Direction Compensation Management Strategy Development and Partner Performance and Governance and Merger Strategy Implementation Compensation Management Firm Performance and Operational Structures & Practice Strategy Merger Search Profitability Improvement Reviews Market and Sector Merger Negotiation and Pricing Partnership Structure Research Structure Client Research and Key Process Improvement Alternative Business Models Client Development Merger Integration Page 1 1 Topics for Discussion • Disruptive Change • Dissolution Trends • Symptoms of Struggle: What Causes Law Firms to Fail? • What Keeps Firms From Changing? • Managing for Stability Page 2 How Rapidly is the Legal Industry Changing? Today 10 Years 2004 Ago Number of US firms at $1 billion or 2327 4 more in revenue: Average gross revenue for Am Law $482$510 million $271 million 200: Median gross revenue for Am Law $310$328 million $193 million 200: NLJ 250 firms with single office 4 11 operations: Number of Am Law 200 lawyers 25,000 10,000 based outside US: Page 4 2 How Rapidly is the Legal Industry Changing? Changes to the Law Firm Business Model Underway • Convergence • Dramatic reduction • Disaggregation in costs • Increasing • Process Client commoditization Overhead improvement • New pricing Model efforts models • Outsourcing
    [Show full text]
  • Beazley Brief Update Risk Management Insights for Law Firms from Beazley
    Beazley Brief Update Risk management insights for law firms from Beazley Finishing Some “Unfinished Business”— California And In the February 2012 and July 2012 issues of the Beazley Brief, we reported on how the “unfinished business” doctrine New York Courts Reject - based on the California Court of Appeals decision in Jewel v. Boxer (156 Cal. App. 3d 171 (1984) - had spawned a rash of “Unfinished Business” Claims suits by dissolving law firms against departing partners and their new firms for taking the old firm’s “unfinished business,” Involving Dissolved Law Firms or pending client matters, with them to their new firms. By Kevin S. Rosen, Christopher Chorba, and Peter Bach-y-Rita Fortunately, the tide has begun to turn against this troubling - Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP trend. Recent decisions by courts in California and New York have determined that dissolved law firms do not have a One of the most troubling trends in recent years has been the property interest in pending hourly unfinished business rise in trustee litigation following the dissolution of several matters. This Beazley Brief Update addresses these major international law firms. Bankruptcy trustees have significant rulings. brought claims to recover profits on “unfinished business” on behalf of defunct firms, asserting an entitlement to fees We are again pleased that Gibson Dunn & Crutcher partners earned on matters handled by new firms that hired partners of Kevin S. Rosen and Christopher Chorba and associate Peter the dissolved firm. In these cases, trustees and debtors of the Bach-y-Rita have graciously agreed to prepare this update. dissolved firms have sued both the former partners and their Kevin is in the firm’s Los Angeles office and chair of the firm’s new firms, relying on the California Court of Appeal decision Law Firm Defense Practice Group.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategist ®
    The Bankruptcy LAW JOURNAL ® NEWSLETTERS Strategist Volume 31, Number 11 • September 2014 Law Firm Clients Defeat Bankruptcy Trustees in New York Court of Appeals By Michael L. Cook represent them, a major inconvenience for the ness.” 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81087, at *18. clients and a practical restriction on a client’s A law firm only owns unpaid compensa- The New York Court of Appeals, on July right to choose counsel.” Id. at *20. In addi- tion for legal services already provided with 1, 2014, in response to questions certified by tion, “clients might worry that their hourly fee respect to a client matter. In the words of the the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Cir- matters are not getting as much attention as New York court, “a client’s legal matter be- cuit, held that “pending hourly fee matters are they deserve if the [new] law firm is prevent- longs to the client, not the lawyer.” Id. at *15. not [a dissolved law firm’s] ‘property’ or ‘un- ed from profiting from its work on them.” Id. The Thelen and Coudert trustees’ litigation finished business’” under New York’s Partner- More important, New York has a “strong pub- will now return to the Second Circuit for dis- ship Law. In re Thelen LLP, _________ N.Y.3d lic policy encouraging client choice and, con- position. Because of this final ruling on appli- _________, 2014 N.Y. LEXIS 1577, *1 (July 1, comitantly, attorney mobility.” Id. at *21. Quot- cable New York Law, the court should direct 2014).
    [Show full text]
  • United States District Court, SD California. QUALCOMM
    Untitled Document 2/28/10 4:30 AM United States District Court, S.D. California. QUALCOMM INCORPORATED, Plaintiff. v. BROADCOM CORPORATION, Defendants. Broadcom Corporation, Counter-Claimant. v. Qualcomm Incorporated, Counter-Defendant. Civil No. 05CV1392-B(BLM) May 1, 2006. Adam Arthur Bier, Christian E. Mammen, James R. Batchelder, Day Casebeer Madrid and Batchelder, Kevin Kook Tai Leung, Law Office of Kevin Kook Tai Leung, Cupertino, CA, Barry Jerome Tucker, David E. Kleinfeld, Foley & Lardner LLP, James T. Hannink, Kathryn Bridget Riley, Randall Evan Kay, Brooke Beros, Dla Piper US, Brandon Hays Pace, Heller Ehrman LLP, Heidi Maley Gutierrez, Higgs Fletcher and Mack, San Diego, CA, E Joshua Rosenkranz, Heller Ehrman, Evan R. Chesler, Richard J. Stark, Cravath Swaine and Moore LLP, Richard S. Taffet, Bingham McCutchen, New York, NY, Nitin Subhedar, Heller Ehrman, Menlo Park, CA, Jaideep Venkatesan, Heller Ehrman, Menlo Park, CA, Jason A. Yurasek, Perkins Coie LLP, San Francisco, CA, Patrick Taylor Weston, McCutchen Doyle Brown and Enersen, Walnut Creek, CA, William F. Abrams, Bingham McCutchen, East Palo Alto, CA, for Plaintiff. Alejandro Menchaca, Andrew B. Karp, Brian C. Bianco, Christopher N. George, Consuelo Erwin, George P. McAndrews, Gregory C. Schodde, Joseph F. Harding, Lawrence M. Jarvis, Leonard D. Conapinski, Matthew A. Anderson, Ronald H. Spuhler, Scott P. McBride, Stephen F. Sherry, Thomas J. Wimbiscus, Jean Dudek Kuelper, McAndrews Held and Malloy, Chicago, IL, Allen C. Nunnally, Daniel M. Esrick, John J. Regan, John S. Rhee, Joseph F. Haag, Kate Saxton, Louis W. Tompros, Richard W. O'Neill, Stephen M. Muller, Vinita Ferrera, Wayne L. Stoner, William F.
    [Show full text]
  • When Law Firms Go Bankrupt — What Secured Lenders Can Learn from the Dewey Bankruptcy
    PLACE PDF @ 88% REPRINTED FROM THE NOV/DEC 2012 ISSUE, VOL. 10, NO. 8 BANKRUPTCY UPDATE When Law Firms Go Bankrupt — What Secured Lenders Can Learn From the Dewey Bankruptcy BY JEFFREY A. WURST, ESQ When law firm Dewey & LeBoeuf filed for Chapter 11 protection, it was obligated to its secured creditors, among many others, led by JP Morgan on a $75 million line of credit facility. Jeffrey Wurst explains what led to Dewey’s collapse and offers advice regarding key indicators of a potential creditor’s fiscal irresponsibility. ictims of bankruptcy come in many forms. Dewey filed for bankruptcy in the U.S. Bankruptcy They include the debtors themselves, as well Court for the Southern District of New York. Many theo- V as their secured and unsecured creditors. When ries abound as to the causes of Dewey’s collapse, but, law firms fall into bankruptcy, the secured lenders are essentially, the crux appears to be that Dewey guaran- often among the hardest hit. Typically, these secured teed an unsustainable amount of compensation to both lenders take security interests in all assets of the law newly acquired and longstanding partners. Hoping to firm when funding operations. The assets with the generate enormous fees off these highly compensated most value tend to be the cash and cash equivalents partners, Dewey subsequently took on debt to fund the and the accounts receivable. The problem with many failing business. However, the economic impact of the recent law firm bankruptcies is that cash on hand is recession forced Dewey to consolidate its debt. Further JEFFREY A.
    [Show full text]
  • IMPACT REPORT 2018 Dear Friends and Supporters of Living Beyond Breast Cancer
    IMPACT REPORT 2018 Dear Friends and Supporters of Living Beyond Breast Cancer, We opened 2018 with Living Beyond Breast Cancer (LBBC) listening to the stories of women diagnosed with breast cancer. This was part of a six-month strategic focus project that included in-depth phone interviews, a large online study, and small in-person focus groups. By listening, we gained many insights of those who Connecting shared their experiences from that dark moment of first hearing the words, “You have breast cancer,” and all the other times that followed, including: the frustrations of waiting for tests, the emotions of finally receiving results, and the challenges of understanding this disease while trying to make informed decisions and manage side effects. Many also told us they gained a new appreciation for friends, family people with and colleagues who offered love and support during difficult as well as celebratory times. This Impact Report provides a glance of LBBC by the numbers. Please remember that behind each of these numbers is an individual who faces a frightening and significant health challenge. We understand trusted that our work, while broad in reach, is also deeply personal. We aim to help alleviate fear, reduce stress, and provide trusted information and support when people are feeling most afraid and alone. This is what drives us to fulfill our mission. breast cancer You are part of a large community of individuals, corporations and foundations who strongly believe in our work. Collectively, your support made it possible for Living Beyond Breast Cancer to engage 600,000 people in our educational programs, online and print resources, and in peer support communities in information 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Educating Artists
    DUKE LAW MAGAZINE MAGAZINE LAW DUKE Fall 2006 | Volume 24 Number 2 F all 2006 Educating Artists V olume 24 Number 2 Also: Duke Faculty on the Hill From the Dean Dear Alumni and Friends, University’s Algernon Sydney Sullivan Medal, awarded annually for outstanding commitment to service. This summer, four Duke law faculty members were Graduates Candace Carroll ’74 and Len Simon ’73 called to testify before Congressional committees. have used their talents and resources in support Professor Neil Vidmar appeared before the Senate of civil liberties, women’s rights, and public inter- Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions, est causes; their recent leadership gift to Duke’s to address legislation on medical malpractice suits. Financial Aid Initiative helps Duke continue to attract Professor Madeline Morris testified before the Senate the best students, regardless of their ability to pay, Foreign Relations Committee regarding ratification of and gives them greater flexibility to pursue public the U.S.–U.K. extradition treaty. Professor James Cox interest careers. Other alumni profiled in this issue offered his views on proposed reforms for the conduct who are using their Duke Law education to make a of securities class action litigation to the House difference include Judge Curtis Collier ’74, Chris Kay Committee on Financial Services Subcommittee ’78, Michael Dockterman ’78, Andrea Nelson Meigs on Capital Markets, Insurance, and Government ’94, and Judge Gerald Tjoflat ’57. Sponsored Enterprises. Professor Scott Silliman, I want to thank all alumni, friends, and faculty executive director of the Center on Law, Ethics and who contributed so generously to the Law School in National Security, was on Capitol Hill three times in the past year.
    [Show full text]
  • Distressed Projects Special Situations Call for Resourceful Thinking and Decisive Action
    Distressed Projects Special situations call for resourceful thinking and decisive action. Some projects are too important to fail. When the best-laid plans don’t work out as intended, the borrowers, investors, and lenders behind large-scale projects must contend with changed circumstances and an imperative to move forward, even when the path ahead is unclear. Ballard Spahr attorneys have the legal background and tactical experience to realign large-scale projects that have gone sideways. We have ample work experience in distressed project finance, and have helped restructure project finance portfolios. We can help projects get back on budget, stay on schedule to meet their completion date and operational and financial obligations, and function at the level and scale that was anticipated at the outset. PROJECT FINANCE We take an integrated approach to project finance, counseling clients on the restructuring options, transactional considerations, regulatory issues, real estate and environmental issues, and litigation strategies necessary when embarking on a workout. Our Project Finance attorneys work with colleagues well-versed in key areas, such as tax, bankruptcy and capital recovery, construction and development, real estate, environmental regulation, labor and employment, governance and ownership, and government relations to devise a comprehensive strategy for bringing projects back into alignment. Our Project Finance lawyers represent developers, manufacturing companies, project companies, guarantors, investors, sponsors, lenders—including commercial banks, DFIs, MLAs, and private equity companies—municipal issuers, underwriters, and bond purchasers in bond-financed projects. We have extensive experience in project financings serving as counsel to independent power producers, federal and state governments, and government-sponsored enterprises.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Sponsorship Packages
    2 Days 500+ Attendees 200+ Companies Represented Unlimited Exposure for Your Company 2020 PHILLY SHRM SYMPOSIUM MARCH 30 & 31, 2020 Philadelphia 201 Hotel THE PHILLY SHRM SYMPOSIUM is a multi-day conference focused on advancing the HR profession and business community through both educational programs and personal connections. The 2020 Symposium will offer 9 jam-packed interactive sessions, pre-conference activities, as well as dynamic keynote and closing presentations. This event is marketed to 10,000+ HR and business professionals in the Greater Philadelphia and attracts 500+ attendees each year. AGENDA Monday, March 30, 2020 4:30pm – 7:00pm: Pre-Conference Presentation 7:00pm – 8:00pm: Pre-Conference Evening Social Tuesday, March 31, 2020 7:30am – 4:45pm: Main Conference Connect. Engage. Lead. 2 2019 CONFERENCE ATTENDEES & SPONSORS The following corporations, government agencies, and non-profit institutions participated in the 2019 Conference as attendees, sponsors or presenters. All 2019 sponsors are bolded below: A Second Chance, Inc CBH Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia A+A Communications Group CBM FIS Group, Inc AAA Club Alliance Children’s Crisis Treatment Center FMC Accolade Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia Gallagher ADP Christiana Care Health Systems, Inc. Gelest Advanced RPO Chubb Glenmede AFR Furniture Rental City of Philadelphia Graham Company AIDS Care Group City of Philadelphia - Office of Workforce Graphic Packaging International, LLC Airgas Development Greater Philadelphia ACMP Align Strategic Consulting Clemens Food Group Green and Spiegel, LLC Aljeel Capital, LLC Coalition of Cancer Cooperative Groups GSI Health, LLC Allan Myers Cohen Selias GuideSpark Aloysius Butler & Clark Colonial School District Habitat for Humanity Philadelphia Amacoil, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • The Confidence of Knowing
    The confidence of knowing. A little knowledge about the health of your kidneys goes a long way to your overall well-being. Learn the risk factors for kidney disease and steps you can take to prevent it. www.kidney.org Commemorative Issue to The Philadelphia Business Journal Supported by st ANNUAL Vie | Philadelphia 31Kidney Ball March 14, 2015 Special advertising supplement to Philadelphia Business Journal April 29, 2011 1 Best Wishes to The National Kidney Foundation For Continued Success in your Vital Mission The Nicoletti Family 2 VISION To enhance the lives of everyone with, at risk of, or affected by kidney disease. Ada and Harry DeBold History of the National Kidney Foundation The National Kidney Foundation was established in 1950 by Ada DeBold in an effort to save the life of her young son who had been diagnosed with pediatric nephrosis. In a heroic goal to find a cure, Ada brought together a group of clinicians and researchers from around the United States to share their findings and develop new approaches to understanding and treating the disease. The collaboration that resulted from Ada’s efforts to raise awareness, encourage research and provide support and treatment formed the basis of the National Kidney Foundation. Mission The National Kidney Foundation is dedicated to preventing kidney and urinary tract diseases, improving the health and well-being of individuals and families affected by kidney disease, and increasing the availability of all organs for transplantation. The National Kidney Foundation is proud to be the leading organization in the United States dedicated to the awareness, prevention and treatment of kidney disease, and we aim to share our knowledge with those at risk, those affected by kidney disease and all those who care for and about them.
    [Show full text]